Fuzzy supertertiary interactions within PSD-95 enable ligand binding

  1. George L Hamilton
  2. Nabanita Saikia
  3. Sujit Basak
  4. Franceine S Welcome
  5. Fang Wu
  6. Jakub Kubiak
  7. Changcheng Zhang
  8. Yan Hao
  9. Claus AM Seidel
  10. Feng Ding  Is a corresponding author
  11. Hugo Sanabria  Is a corresponding author
  12. Mark E Bowen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Clemson University, United States
  2. Stony Brook University, United States
  3. Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany
  4. Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany

Abstract

The scaffold protein PSD-95 links postsynaptic receptors to sites of presynaptic neurotransmitter release. Flexible linkers between folded domains in PSD-95 enable a dynamic supertertiary structure. Interdomain interactions within the PSG supramodule, formed by PDZ3, SH3 and Guanylate Kinase domains, regulate PSD-95 activity. Here we combined Discrete Molecular Dynamics and single molecule FRET to characterize the PSG supramodule, with time resolution spanning picoseconds to seconds. We used a FRET network to measure distances in full-length PSD-95 and model the conformational ensemble. We found that PDZ3 samples two conformational basins, which we confirmed with disulfide mapping. To understand effects on activity, we measured binding of the synaptic adhesion protein neuroligin. We found that PSD-95 bound neuroligin well at physiological pH while truncated PDZ3 bound poorly. Our hybrid structural models reveal how the supertertiary context of PDZ3 enables recognition of this critical synaptic ligand.

Data availability

Datasets of FRET values from smTIRF have been uploaded as Figure 4-Source Data 1. The MATLAB scripts used to analyze smTIRF data have been uploaded as Source Code 1. Datasets from Confocal Microscopy with Multiparameter Fluorescence Detection (Raw, MFD Bursts, TCSPC, PDA, and FCS), along with structures used in generating simulated distances and DMD screening, are available at Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6983428). Datasets from Discrete Molecular Dynamics are available at https://dlab.clemson.edu/research/PSD95-PSG/.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. George L Hamilton

    Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Nabanita Saikia

    Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sujit Basak

    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Franceine S Welcome

    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Fang Wu

    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jakub Kubiak

    Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Changcheng Zhang

    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Yan Hao

    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Claus AM Seidel

    Institute for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5171-149X
  10. Feng Ding

    Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, United States
    For correspondence
    fding@clemson.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1850-6336
  11. Hugo Sanabria

    Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, United States
    For correspondence
    hsanabr@clemson.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7068-6827
  12. Mark E Bowen

    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, United States
    For correspondence
    mark.bowen@stonybrook.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9525-6986

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (MH081923)

  • Mark E Bowen

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM130451)

  • Hugo Sanabria

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM119691)

  • Feng Ding

National Science Foundation (MCB1749778)

  • Hugo Sanabria

National Science Foundation (CBET1553945)

  • Feng Ding

European Research Council (671208)

  • George L Hamilton
  • Claus AM Seidel
  • Hugo Sanabria

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Hamilton et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,345
    views
  • 350
    downloads
  • 17
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. George L Hamilton
  2. Nabanita Saikia
  3. Sujit Basak
  4. Franceine S Welcome
  5. Fang Wu
  6. Jakub Kubiak
  7. Changcheng Zhang
  8. Yan Hao
  9. Claus AM Seidel
  10. Feng Ding
  11. Hugo Sanabria
  12. Mark E Bowen
(2022)
Fuzzy supertertiary interactions within PSD-95 enable ligand binding
eLife 11:e77242.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77242

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77242

Further reading

    1. Medicine
    2. Neuroscience
    Alberto Granzotto, Bryce Vissel, Stefano L Sensi
    Review Article

    The recent, controversial approval of antibody-based treatments for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is fueling a heated debate on the molecular determinants of this condition. The discussion should also incorporate a critical revision of the limitations of preclinical mouse models in advancing our understanding of AD. We critically discuss the limitations of animal models, stressing the need for careful consideration of how experiments are designed and results interpreted. We identify the shortcomings of AD models to recapitulate the complexity of the human disease. We dissect these issues at the quantitative, qualitative, temporal, and context-dependent levels. We argue that these models are based on the oversimplistic assumptions proposed by the amyloid cascade hypothesis (ACH) of AD and fail to account for the multifactorial nature of the condition. By shedding light on the constraints of current experimental tools, this review aims to foster the development and implementation of more clinically relevant tools. While we do not rule out a role for preclinical models, we call for alternative approaches to be explored and, most importantly, for a re-evaluation of the ACH.

    1. Neuroscience
    Hari Teja Kalidindi, Frederic Crevecoeur
    Research Article

    Combining individual actions into sequences is a hallmark of everyday activities. Classical theories propose that the motor system forms a single specification of the sequence as a whole, leading to the coarticulation of the different elements. In contrast, recent neural recordings challenge this idea and suggest independent execution of each element specified separately. Here, we show that separate or coarticulated sequences can result from the same task-dependent controller, without implying different representations in the brain. Simulations show that planning for multiple reaches simultaneously allows separate or coarticulated sequences depending on instructions about intermediate goals. Human experiments in a two-reach sequence task validated this model. Furthermore, in co-articulated sequences, the second goal influenced long-latency stretch responses to external loads applied during the first reach, demonstrating the involvement of the sensorimotor network supporting fast feedback control. Overall, our study establishes a computational framework for sequence production that highlights the importance of feedback control in this essential motor skill.