Immune dynamics in SARS-CoV-2 experienced immunosuppressed rheumatoid arthritis or multiple sclerosis patients vaccinated with mRNA-1273

Abstract

Background: Patients affected by different types of autoimmune diseases, including common conditions such as Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), are often treated with immunosuppressants to suppress disease activity. It is not fully understood how the SARS-CoV-2 specific humoral and cellular immunity induced by infection and/or upon vaccination is affected by immunosuppressants.

Methods: The dynamics of cellular immune reactivation upon vaccination of SARS-CoV-2 experienced MS patients treated with the humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody ocrelizumab (OCR) and RA patients treated with methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy were analyzed at great depth via high-dimensional flow cytometry of whole blood samples upon vaccination with the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine. Longitudinal B and T cell immune responses were compared to SARS-CoV-2 experienced healthy controls (HC) before and 7-days after the first and second vaccination.

Results: OCR-treated MS patients exhibit a preserved recall response of CD8+ T central memory cells following first vaccination compared to healthy controls and a similar CD4+ circulating T follicular helper 1 and T helper 1 dynamics, whereas humoral and B cell responses were strongly impaired resulting in absence of SARS-CoV-2 specific humoral immunity. MTX treatment significantly delayed antibody levels and B reactivation following the first vaccination, including sustained inhibition of overall reactivation marker dynamics of the responding CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

Conclusion: Together, these findings indicate that SARS-CoV-2 experienced MS-OCR patients still benefit from vaccination by inducing a broad CD8+ T cell response which can contribute to milder disease outcome. A delayed dynamics of vaccine-induced immunological recall in RA-MTX patients support repeated vaccine strategies to protect against future variants of concern, especially for these patients.

Funding: This research project was supported by ZonMw (The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, #10430072010007), the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement (#792532 and #860003), the European Commission (SUPPORT-E, #101015756) and by PPOC (#20_21 L2506), the NHMRC Leadership Investigator Grant (#1173871).

Data availability

All raw and processed data presented in this study are available at https://flowrepository.org/id/FR-FCM-Z52K

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Niels JM Verstegen

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5732-4979
  2. Ruth R Hagen

    Department of Hematopoiesis, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Jet van den Dijssel

    Department of Hematopoiesis, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4849-0374
  4. Lisan H Kuijper

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3009-0943
  5. Christine Kreher

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Thomas Ashhurst

    Sydney Cytometry Core Research Facility, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7269-7773
  7. Laura YL Kummer

    Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Maurice Steenhuis

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Mariel Duurland

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Rivka de Jongh

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Nina de Jong

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Ellen van der Schoot

    Department of Experimental Immunohematology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Amélie V Bos

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Erik Mul

    Department of Research Facilities, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Katherine Kedzierska

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology,, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6141-335X
  16. Peter J van Dam

    Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Eileen W Stalman

    Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Laura Boekel

    Amsterdam Rheumatology and immunology Center, Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Gertjan L Wolbink

    Amsterdam Rheumatology and immunology Center, Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Sander W Tas

    Amsterdam Rheumatology and immunology Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  21. Joep Killestein

    Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    Joep Killestein, has speaking relationships with Merck, Biogen, TEVA, Sanofi, Genzyme, Roche and Novartis. AmsterdamUMC, location VUmc, MS Center Amsterdam has received financial support for research activities from Merck, Celgene, Biogen, GlaxoSmithKline, Immunic, Roche, Teva, Sanofi, Genzyme, and Novartis..
  22. Zoé LE van Kempen

    Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  23. Luuk Wieske

    Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2522-4081
  24. Taco W Kuijpers

    Department of Pediatric Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  25. Filip Eftimov

    Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  26. Theo Rispens

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  27. Marieke SM van Ham

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  28. Anja ten Brinke

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    a.tenbrinke@sanquin.nl
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  29. Carolien E van de Sandt

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology,, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    For correspondence
    cvandesandt@unimelb.edu.au
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4155-7433

Funding

ZonMw (#10430072010007)

  • Taco W Kuijpers
  • Filip Eftimov
  • Theo Rispens

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (#860003)

  • Taco W Kuijpers
  • Filip Eftimov
  • Theo Rispens
  • Carolien E van de Sandt

European Commission (#101015756)

  • Niels JM Verstegen

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (#792532)

  • Carolien E van de Sandt

NHMRC (1173871)

  • Joep Killestein

PPOC (#20_21 L2506)

  • Taco W Kuijpers
  • Filip Eftimov
  • Theo Rispens

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Sarah Sasson, The Kirby Institute UNSW, Australia

Ethics

Human subjects: This study was approved by the medical ethical committee (NL74974.018.20 and EudraCT 2021-001102-30, local METC nummer: 2020_194) and registered at Dutch Trial Register (Trial ID NL8900). Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants when enrolled. Participants were recruited between April 16th 2021 and May 20th 2021 at the MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC and the Amsterdam READE Rheumatology and Immunology Center and vaccinated between April 19th 2021 and July 1st 2021 with the mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine at an interval of six weeks, according to the Dutch national vaccination guidelines.

Version history

  1. Received: February 17, 2022
  2. Accepted: July 14, 2022
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 15, 2022 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 29, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Verstegen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,172
    views
  • 317
    downloads
  • 11
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Niels JM Verstegen
  2. Ruth R Hagen
  3. Jet van den Dijssel
  4. Lisan H Kuijper
  5. Christine Kreher
  6. Thomas Ashhurst
  7. Laura YL Kummer
  8. Maurice Steenhuis
  9. Mariel Duurland
  10. Rivka de Jongh
  11. Nina de Jong
  12. Ellen van der Schoot
  13. Amélie V Bos
  14. Erik Mul
  15. Katherine Kedzierska
  16. Peter J van Dam
  17. Eileen W Stalman
  18. Laura Boekel
  19. Gertjan L Wolbink
  20. Sander W Tas
  21. Joep Killestein
  22. Zoé LE van Kempen
  23. Luuk Wieske
  24. Taco W Kuijpers
  25. Filip Eftimov
  26. Theo Rispens
  27. Marieke SM van Ham
  28. Anja ten Brinke
  29. Carolien E van de Sandt
  30. on behalf of the T2B! immunity against SARS-CoV-2 study group
(2022)
Immune dynamics in SARS-CoV-2 experienced immunosuppressed rheumatoid arthritis or multiple sclerosis patients vaccinated with mRNA-1273
eLife 11:e77969.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77969

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77969

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Mark S Lee, Peter J Tuohy ... Michael S Kuhns
    Research Advance

    CD4+ T cell activation is driven by five-module receptor complexes. The T cell receptor (TCR) is the receptor module that binds composite surfaces of peptide antigens embedded within MHCII molecules (pMHCII). It associates with three signaling modules (CD3γε, CD3δε, and CD3ζζ) to form TCR-CD3 complexes. CD4 is the coreceptor module. It reciprocally associates with TCR-CD3-pMHCII assemblies on the outside of a CD4+ T cells and with the Src kinase, LCK, on the inside. Previously, we reported that the CD4 transmembrane GGXXG and cytoplasmic juxtamembrane (C/F)CV+C motifs found in eutherian (placental mammal) CD4 have constituent residues that evolved under purifying selection (Lee et al., 2022). Expressing mutants of these motifs together in T cell hybridomas increased CD4-LCK association but reduced CD3ζ, ZAP70, and PLCγ1 phosphorylation levels, as well as IL-2 production, in response to agonist pMHCII. Because these mutants preferentially localized CD4-LCK pairs to non-raft membrane fractions, one explanation for our results was that they impaired proximal signaling by sequestering LCK away from TCR-CD3. An alternative hypothesis is that the mutations directly impacted signaling because the motifs normally play an LCK-independent role in signaling. The goal of this study was to discriminate between these possibilities. Using T cell hybridomas, our results indicate that: intracellular CD4-LCK interactions are not necessary for pMHCII-specific signal initiation; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs are key determinants of CD4-mediated pMHCII-specific signal amplification; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs exert their functions independently of direct CD4-LCK association. These data provide a mechanistic explanation for why residues within these motifs are under purifying selection in jawed vertebrates. The results are also important to consider for biomimetic engineering of synthetic receptors.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Jean-David Larouche, Céline M Laumont ... Claude Perreault
    Research Article

    Transposable elements (TEs) are repetitive sequences representing ~45% of the human and mouse genomes and are highly expressed by medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs). In this study, we investigated the role of TEs on T-cell development in the thymus. We performed multiomic analyses of TEs in human and mouse thymic cells to elucidate their role in T-cell development. We report that TE expression in the human thymus is high and shows extensive age- and cell lineage-related variations. TE expression correlates with multiple transcription factors in all cell types of the human thymus. Two cell types express particularly broad TE repertoires: mTECs and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). In mTECs, transcriptomic data suggest that TEs interact with transcription factors essential for mTEC development and function (e.g., PAX1 and REL), and immunopeptidomic data showed that TEs generate MHC-I-associated peptides implicated in thymocyte education. Notably, AIRE, FEZF2, and CHD4 regulate small yet non-redundant sets of TEs in murine mTECs. Human thymic pDCs homogenously express large numbers of TEs that likely form dsRNA, which can activate innate immune receptors, potentially explaining why thymic pDCs constitutively secrete IFN ɑ/β. This study highlights the diversity of interactions between TEs and the adaptive immune system. TEs are genetic parasites, and the two thymic cell types most affected by TEs (mTEcs and pDCs) are essential to establishing central T-cell tolerance. Therefore, we propose that orchestrating TE expression in thymic cells is critical to prevent autoimmunity in vertebrates.