Abstract

Background: HIV infection dysregulates the B cell compartment, affecting memory B cell formation and the antibody response to infection and vaccination. Understanding the B cell response to SARS-CoV-2 in people living with HIV (PLWH) may explain the increased morbidity, reduced vaccine efficacy, reduced clearance, and intra-host evolution of SARS-CoV-2 observed in some HIV-1 coinfections.

Methods: We compared B cell responses to COVID-19 in PLWH and HIV negative (HIV-ve) patients in a cohort recruited in Durban, South Africa, during the first pandemic wave in July 2020 using detailed flow cytometry phenotyping of longitudinal samples with markers of B cell maturation, homing and regulatory features.

Results: This revealed a coordinated B cell response to COVID-19 that differed significantly between HIV-ve and PLWH. Memory B cells in PLWH displayed evidence of reduced germinal center (GC) activity, homing capacity and class-switching responses, with increased PD-L1 expression, and decreased Tfh frequency. This was mirrored by increased extrafollicular (EF) activity, with dynamic changes in activated double negative (DN2) and activated naïve B cells, which correlated with anti-RBD-titres in these individuals. An elevated SARS-CoV-2 specific EF response in PLWH was confirmed using viral spike and RBD bait proteins.

Conclusions: Despite similar disease severity, these trends were highest in participants with uncontrolled HIV, implicating HIV in driving these changes. EF B cell responses are rapid but give rise to lower affinity antibodies, less durable long-term memory, and reduced capacity to adapt to new variants. Further work is needed to determine the long-term effects of HIV on SARS-CoV-2 immunity, particularly as new variants emerge.

Funding: This work was supported by a grant from the Wellcome Trust to the Africa Health Research Institute (Wellcome Trust Strategic Core Award [grant number 201433/Z/16/Z]). Additional funding was received from the South African Department of Science and Innovation through the National Research Foundation (South African Research Chairs Initiative, [grant number 64809]), and the Victor Daitz Foundation.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and Source data 1.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Robert Krause

    Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
    For correspondence
    robert.krause@ahri.org
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1558-0397
  2. Jumari Snyman

    Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Hwa Shi-Hsia

    Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Daniel Muema

    Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Farina Karim

    School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9698-016X
  6. Yashica Ganga

    Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Abigail Ngoepe

    Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Yenzekile Zungu

    Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Inbal Gazy

    KwaZulu-Natal Research Innovation and Sequencing Platform, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Mallory Bernstein

    Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Khadija Khan

    Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7565-7400
  12. Matilda Mazibuko

    Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Ntombifuthi Mthabela

    Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Dirhona Ramjit

    Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. COMMIT-KZN Team

  16. Oliver Limbo

    International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Joseph Jardine

    International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Devin Sok

    International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Ian A Wilson

    Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Willem Hanekom

    Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  21. Alex Sigal

    Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    Alex Sigal, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8571-2004
  22. Henrik Kløverpris

    Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  23. Thumbi Ndung'u

    Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2962-3992
  24. Alasdair Leslie

    Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

Wellcome Trust (201433/Z/16/Z)

  • Alex Sigal

National Research Foundation (64809)

  • Alex Sigal

Victor Daitz Foundation

  • Alex Sigal

Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology (open access funding)

  • Alex Sigal

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Bavesh D Kana, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa

Ethics

Human subjects: The study protocol was approved by the University of KwaZulu-Natal Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (approval BREC/00001275/2020). Written informed consent was obtained for all enrolled participants.

Version history

  1. Received: May 3, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: June 15, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: October 23, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: October 27, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: November 8, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Krause et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 837
    views
  • 183
    downloads
  • 10
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Robert Krause
  2. Jumari Snyman
  3. Hwa Shi-Hsia
  4. Daniel Muema
  5. Farina Karim
  6. Yashica Ganga
  7. Abigail Ngoepe
  8. Yenzekile Zungu
  9. Inbal Gazy
  10. Mallory Bernstein
  11. Khadija Khan
  12. Matilda Mazibuko
  13. Ntombifuthi Mthabela
  14. Dirhona Ramjit
  15. COMMIT-KZN Team
  16. Oliver Limbo
  17. Joseph Jardine
  18. Devin Sok
  19. Ian A Wilson
  20. Willem Hanekom
  21. Alex Sigal
  22. Henrik Kløverpris
  23. Thumbi Ndung'u
  24. Alasdair Leslie
(2022)
HIV skews the SARS-CoV-2 B cell response toward an extrafollicular maturation pathway
eLife 11:e79924.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79924

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79924

Further reading

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Patrick E Brown, Sze Hang Fu ... Ab-C Study Collaborators
    Research Article Updated

    Background:

    Few national-level studies have evaluated the impact of ‘hybrid’ immunity (vaccination coupled with recovery from infection) from the Omicron variants of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

    Methods:

    From May 2020 to December 2022, we conducted serial assessments (each of ~4000–9000 adults) examining SARS-CoV-2 antibodies within a mostly representative Canadian cohort drawn from a national online polling platform. Adults, most of whom were vaccinated, reported viral test-confirmed infections and mailed self-collected dried blood spots (DBSs) to a central lab. Samples underwent highly sensitive and specific antibody assays to spike and nucleocapsid protein antigens, the latter triggered only by infection. We estimated cumulative SARS-CoV-2 incidence prior to the Omicron period and during the BA.1/1.1 and BA.2/5 waves. We assessed changes in antibody levels and in age-specific active immunity levels.

    Results:

    Spike levels were higher in infected than in uninfected adults, regardless of vaccination doses. Among adults vaccinated at least thrice and infected more than 6 months earlier, spike levels fell notably and continuously for the 9-month post-vaccination. In contrast, among adults infected within 6 months, spike levels declined gradually. Declines were similar by sex, age group, and ethnicity. Recent vaccination attenuated declines in spike levels from older infections. In a convenience sample, spike antibody and cellular responses were correlated. Near the end of 2022, about 35% of adults above age 60 had their last vaccine dose more than 6 months ago, and about 25% remained uninfected. The cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection rose from 13% (95% confidence interval 11–14%) before omicron to 78% (76–80%) by December 2022, equating to 25 million infected adults cumulatively. However, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) weekly death rate during the BA.2/5 waves was less than half of that during the BA.1/1.1 wave, implying a protective role for hybrid immunity.

    Conclusions:

    Strategies to maintain population-level hybrid immunity require up-to-date vaccination coverage, including among those recovering from infection. Population-based, self-collected DBSs are a practicable biological surveillance platform.

    Funding:

    Funding was provided by the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Pfizer Global Medical Grants, and St. Michael’s Hospital Foundation. PJ and ACG are funded by the Canada Research Chairs Program.

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    Sean V Connelly, Nicholas F Brazeau ... Jeffrey A Bailey
    Research Article

    Background:

    The Zanzibar archipelago of Tanzania has become a low-transmission area for Plasmodium falciparum. Despite being considered an area of pre-elimination for years, achieving elimination has been difficult, likely due to a combination of imported infections from mainland Tanzania and continued local transmission.

    Methods:

    To shed light on these sources of transmission, we applied highly multiplexed genotyping utilizing molecular inversion probes to characterize the genetic relatedness of 282 P. falciparum isolates collected across Zanzibar and in Bagamoyo district on the coastal mainland from 2016 to 2018.

    Results:

    Overall, parasite populations on the coastal mainland and Zanzibar archipelago remain highly related. However, parasite isolates from Zanzibar exhibit population microstructure due to the rapid decay of parasite relatedness over very short distances. This, along with highly related pairs within shehias, suggests ongoing low-level local transmission. We also identified highly related parasites across shehias that reflect human mobility on the main island of Unguja and identified a cluster of highly related parasites, suggestive of an outbreak, in the Micheweni district on Pemba island. Parasites in asymptomatic infections demonstrated higher complexity of infection than those in symptomatic infections, but have similar core genomes.

    Conclusions:

    Our data support importation as a main source of genetic diversity and contribution to the parasite population in Zanzibar, but they also show local outbreak clusters where targeted interventions are essential to block local transmission. These results highlight the need for preventive measures against imported malaria and enhanced control measures in areas that remain receptive to malaria reemergence due to susceptible hosts and competent vectors.

    Funding:

    This research was funded by the National Institutes of Health, grants R01AI121558, R01AI137395, R01AI155730, F30AI143172, and K24AI134990. Funding was also contributed from the Swedish Research Council, Erling-Persson Family Foundation, and the Yang Fund. RV acknowledges funding from the MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis (reference MR/R015600/1), jointly funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), under the MRC/FCDO Concordat agreement and is also part of the EDCTP2 program supported by the European Union. RV also acknowledges funding by Community Jameel.