Selection on plastic adherence leads to hyper-multicellular strains and incidental virulence in the budding yeast

Abstract

Many disease-causing microbes are not obligate pathogens; rather, they are environmental microbes taking advantage of an ecological opportunity. The existence of microbes whose life cycle does not require a host and are not normally pathogenic, yet are well-suited to host exploitation, is an evolutionary puzzle. One hypothesis posits that selection in the environment may favor traits that incidentally lead to pathogenicity and virulence, or serve as pre-adaptations for survival in a host. An example of such a trait is surface adherence. To experimentally test the idea of 'accidental virulence', replicate populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae were evolved to attach to a plastic bead for hundreds of generations. Along with plastic adherence, two multicellular phenotypes- biofilm formation and flor formation- increased; another phenotype, pseudohyphal growth, responded to the nutrient limitation. Thus, experimental selection led to the evolution of highly-adherent, hyper-multicellular strains. Wax moth larvae injected with evolved hyper-multicellular strains were significantly more likely to die than those injected with evolved non-multicellular strains. Hence, selection on plastic adherence incidentally led to the evolution of enhanced multicellularity and increased virulence. Our results support the idea that selection for a trait beneficial in the open environment can inadvertently generate opportunistic, 'accidental' pathogens.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided for Figures 1, 2, and 5.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Luke I Ekdahl

    Department of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Juliana A Salcedo

    Department of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Matthew M Dungan

    Department of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Despina V Mason

    Department of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Dulguun Myagmarsuren

    Department of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Helen A Murphy

    Department of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, United States
    For correspondence
    hamurphy@wm.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4363-4543

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R15-GM122032)

  • Helen A Murphy

National Science Foundation (DEB-1839555)

  • Helen A Murphy

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Ekdahl et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,047
    views
  • 150
    downloads
  • 2
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Luke I Ekdahl
  2. Juliana A Salcedo
  3. Matthew M Dungan
  4. Despina V Mason
  5. Dulguun Myagmarsuren
  6. Helen A Murphy
(2023)
Selection on plastic adherence leads to hyper-multicellular strains and incidental virulence in the budding yeast
eLife 12:e81056.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81056

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81056

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    Silas Tittes, Anne Lorant ... Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
    Research Article

    What is the genetic architecture of local adaptation and what is the geographic scale over which it operates? We investigated patterns of local and convergent adaptation in five sympatric population pairs of traditionally cultivated maize and its wild relative teosinte (Zea mays subsp. parviglumis). We found that signatures of local adaptation based on the inference of adaptive fixations and selective sweeps are frequently exclusive to individual populations, more so in teosinte compared to maize. However, for both maize and teosinte, selective sweeps are also frequently shared by several populations, and often between subspecies. We were further able to infer that selective sweeps were shared among populations most often via migration, though sharing via standing variation was also common. Our analyses suggest that teosinte has been a continued source of beneficial alleles for maize, even after domestication, and that maize populations have facilitated adaptation in teosinte by moving beneficial alleles across the landscape. Taken together, our results suggest local adaptation in maize and teosinte has an intermediate geographic scale, one that is larger than individual populations but smaller than the species range.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Gregor Belušič
    Insight

    The first complete 3D reconstruction of the compound eye of a minute wasp species sheds light on the nuts and bolts of size reduction.