Brain: Connecting the lines after a stroke

In mice, stimulating cortical areas in the undamaged hemisphere of a brain affected by stroke impairs recovery.
  1. S Thomas Carmichael  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, United States

The brain is divided into hemispheres which are connected through a bundle of nerve fibers known as the corpus callosum. Each hemisphere controls the opposite side of the body: for example, a precise cortical area in the right hemisphere will be responsible for sending and receiving information to and from the left hand. This cortical area is connected to neighboring brain territories as well as to corresponding regions in the opposite (or ‘contralateral’) hemisphere via callosal connections (Figure 1A).

Stimulating cortex areas contralateral to the site of a stroke impairs recovery and reconnection.

(A) Dorsal view of the human brain. Cortical areas in the human brain are functionally connected with regions in both the same (ipsilateral) and opposite (contralateral) hemisphere. These connections (represented by arrows) are present when brain areas are co-active in time and are associated with a behavioral output, such as moving or sensing the hand. (B) Dorsal view of the mouse brain. Stimulation of the mouse forepaw activates a specific region of the primary somatosensory cortex that the paw is mapped on to, which is the area studied by Bice et al. (C) Inducing a stroke in the forepaw area (red circle) stops the activation of this region and the surrounding cortex following forepaw stimulation for at least seven days. At later time points (one month), stimulation of the forepaw is once again able to activate the brain, this time in a forepaw representation that is shifted to a new site due to cortical plasticity. At later time points, the forepaw cortical area is re-integrated into a network in which it is connected to ipsilateral sensory, motor and cortical associated areas, and contralateral sensory and motor areas. (D) Chronic, daily stimulation of the somatosensory cortex that is contralateral to the stroke site (lightning bolt) impairs the local remapping of the forepaw area and interferes with the integration of the recovered cortex into functional brain networks. Under these conditions, callosal connections, when activated, actually inhibit large areas of the cortex in the opposite hemisphere.

Image credit: Created with

Electrically stimulating certain regions of the brain is relatively simple, and it has long been pursued to enhance recovery after injury or stroke (when the blood supply to a brain region stops). In healthy individuals, for example, directly stimulating motor areas improves motor skill performance (Lefaucheur, 2019). At present, 301 clinical trials are registered to explore the impact of brain stimulation on stroke patients, examining outcomes ranging from upper or lower limb function to the ability to reflect on one’s thinking. In particular, inhibiting a motor region in one hemisphere may enhance the activity and motor performance of the corresponding area in the contralateral hemisphere, potentially leading to improved motor function after a stroke. However, this contralateral inhibition approach has not been consistently effective at improving brain recovery (Henrich-Noack et al., 2017).

To develop enhanced approaches, scientists need to first have a better understanding of how stimulation impacts the circuitry which connects the brain hemispheres. Now, in eLife, Adam Bauer and colleagues at Washington University in St. Louis and Lund University – including Annie Bice as first author – report new findings that suggest stimulating cortical areas contralateral to the regions affected by a stroke inhibits recovery (Bice et al., 2022).

The team induced small strokes in an area in the cortex of mice which had been genetically engineered so that some of their excitatory neurons could be activated by light; the cortical area targeted is activated by sensory and motor information from one of the animal’s forepaws (Figure 1B). Next, specific excitatory neurons in the contralateral (non-damaged) cortex were optically stimulated for five consecutive days for four weeks. This procedure has been shown to enhance neuronal activity in connected brain areas (Cheng et al., 2014).

Following a stroke, the brain being able to exhibit plasticity – and therefore nearby cortical areas taking on the role of the damaged regions – is associated with recovery. Examining this re-mapping of cortical connections can give an independent indicator of how damaged or plastic the circuitry may be after a stroke. To explore how contralateral stimulation affected this process, Bice et al. recorded behavioral recovery and assessed the functional connectivity of cortical areas. In addition, they mapped how the forepaw was represented in the mice’s cortex using optical intrinsic signal imaging, a method based on blood flow which helps to capture the functional architecture of the cortex. This showed that one week after the stroke, the damaged brain area or its immediate surroundings exhibited no or blunted responses when the corresponding paw was stimulated. Yet, as noted by other reports, areas near the wounded region started to respond to stimulation over time, highlighting that cortical activation had spontaneously recovered (Figure 1C; Brown et al., 2009). However, Bice et al. found that chronic, daily stimulation of the contralateral cortex impaired this plasticity and the natural recovery of the cortical map after a stroke.

A stroke disconnects brain regions that normally have concerted or joint activity in mediating a particular task. These networks of co-active brain areas have already been identified in humans (Bowren et al., 2022). Here, Bice et al. harnessed optical intrinsic signal imaging to examine the state of these networks in mice. They found that following spontaneous recovery, regions in or near the stroke part of the cortex had regained highly correlated patterns of activity with their healthy counterparts on the other hemisphere. However, chronic stimulation of the cortex contralateral to the site of the stroke inhibited this re-establishment of functional connections across the hemispheres.

Finally, Brice et al. explored callosal function in healthy and stroke brains. Optically stimulating cortical regions in the healthy hemisphere and tracking their connections in awake mice showed that, as expected, callosal connections activate the regions they are tied to in the opposite hemisphere. However, they also slightly inhibit the functional connections between these regions and the areas around them. Chronically stimulating the contralateral cortex after a stroke significantly increases and extends this callosal inhibition, therefore impairing the remapping process that takes place naturally after a stroke (Figure 1D).

Certain limitations prevent the conclusions of this study from being applied more widely. For example, all excitatory neurons were stimulated and not just callosal neurons; this means that the effects observed in the damaged hemisphere may not be due to a direct relay across callosal connections, but instead because of circuit processing in the stimulated cortex or in other brain areas. In addition, it is unclear how the results could apply to human brains, for which stroke affects larger areas and involves cortical and subcortical damage (Otsuka and Kawaguchi, 2011; Petrus et al., 2020). Finally, the work establishes important data for only one type of cortical circuit, and other kinds (such as the motor cortex) may vary in their response to injury or stimulation. Nevertheless, the experiments conducted by Bice et al. pave the way for a more nuanced approach to brain stimulation for stroke recovery.


    1. Lefaucheur JP
    Handbook of Clinical Neurology
    559–580, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Vol, 160, 10.1016/B978-0-444-64032-1.00037-0, 31277876.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. S Thomas Carmichael

    S Thomas Carmichael is in the Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, United States

    For correspondence
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1169-9203

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: July 28, 2022 (version 1)


© 2022, Carmichael

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.


  • 991
    Page views
  • 155
  • 0

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. S Thomas Carmichael
Brain: Connecting the lines after a stroke
eLife 11:e81306.

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Katja Heuer, Nicolas Traut ... Roberto Toro
    Research Article

    The process of brain folding is thought to play an important role in the development and organisation of the cerebrum and the cerebellum. The study of cerebellar folding is challenging due to the small size and abundance of its folia. In consequence, little is known about its anatomical diversity and evolution. We constituted an open collection of histological data from 56 mammalian species and manually segmented the cerebrum and the cerebellum. We developed methods to measure the geometry of cerebellar folia and to estimate the thickness of the molecular layer. We used phylogenetic comparative methods to study the diversity and evolution of cerebellar folding and its relationship with the anatomy of the cerebrum. Our results show that the evolution of cerebellar and cerebral anatomy follows a stabilising selection process. We observed 2 groups of phenotypes changing concertedly through evolution: a group of 'diverse' phenotypes - varying over several orders of magnitude together with body size, and a group of 'stable' phenotypes varying over less than 1 order of magnitude across species. Our analyses confirmed the strong correlation between cerebral and cerebellar volumes across species, and showed in addition that large cerebella are disproportionately more folded than smaller ones. Compared with the extreme variations in cerebellar surface area, folial anatomy and molecular layer thickness varied only slightly, showing a much smaller increase in the larger cerebella. We discuss how these findings could provide new insights into the diversity and evolution of cerebellar folding, the mechanisms of cerebellar and cerebral folding, and their potential influence on the organisation of the brain across species.

    1. Neuroscience
    Amanda J González Segarra, Gina Pontes ... Kristin Scott
    Research Article

    Consumption of food and water is tightly regulated by the nervous system to maintain internal nutrient homeostasis. Although generally considered independently, interactions between hunger and thirst drives are important to coordinate competing needs. In Drosophila, four neurons called the interoceptive subesophageal zone neurons (ISNs) respond to intrinsic hunger and thirst signals to oppositely regulate sucrose and water ingestion. Here, we investigate the neural circuit downstream of the ISNs to examine how ingestion is regulated based on internal needs. Utilizing the recently available fly brain connectome, we find that the ISNs synapse with a novel cell-type bilateral T-shaped neuron (BiT) that projects to neuroendocrine centers. In vivo neural manipulations revealed that BiT oppositely regulates sugar and water ingestion. Neuroendocrine cells downstream of ISNs include several peptide-releasing and peptide-sensing neurons, including insulin producing cells (IPCs), crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP) neurons, and CCHamide-2 receptor isoform RA (CCHa2R-RA) neurons. These neurons contribute differentially to ingestion of sugar and water, with IPCs and CCAP neurons oppositely regulating sugar and water ingestion, and CCHa2R-RA neurons modulating only water ingestion. Thus, the decision to consume sugar or water occurs via regulation of a broad peptidergic network that integrates internal signals of nutritional state to generate nutrient-specific ingestion.