1. Developmental Biology
  2. Evolutionary Biology

Antagonistic role of the BTB-zinc finger transcription factors Chinmo and Broad-Complex in the juvenile/pupal transition and in growth control

  1. Sílvia Chafino
  2. Panagiotis Giannios
  3. Jordi Casanova
  4. David Martín  Is a corresponding author
  5. Xavier Franch-Marro  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institut de Biologia Molecular de Barcelona (CSIC), Spain
  2. Institute of Evolutionary Biology (IBE, CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Spain
  3. Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Institute for Research in Biomedicine, IRB Barcelona, Spain
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84648
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Sílvia Chafino
  2. Panagiotis Giannios
  3. Jordi Casanova
  4. David Martín
  5. Xavier Franch-Marro
(2023)
Antagonistic role of the BTB-zinc finger transcription factors Chinmo and Broad-Complex in the juvenile/pupal transition and in growth control
eLife 12:e84648.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84648
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

During development, the growing organism transits through a series of temporally regulated morphological stages to generate the adult form. In humans, for example, development progresses from childhood through to puberty and then to adulthood, when sexual maturity is attained. Similarly, in holometabolous insects, immature juveniles transit to the adult form through an intermediate pupal stage when larval tissues are eliminated and the imaginal progenitor cells form the adult structures. The identity of the larval, pupal, and adult stages depends on the sequential expression of the transcription factors chinmo, Br-C, and E93. However, how these transcription factors determine temporal identity in developing tissues is poorly understood. Here, we report on the role of the larval specifier chinmo in larval and adult progenitor cells during fly development. Interestingly, chinmo promotes growth in larval and imaginal tissues in a Br-C-independent and -dependent manner, respectively. In addition, we found that the absence of chinmo during metamorphosis is critical for proper adult differentiation. Importantly, we also provide evidence that, in contrast to the well-known role of chinmo as a pro-oncogene, Br-C and E93 act as tumour suppressors. Finally, we reveal that the function of chinmo as a juvenile specifier is conserved in hemimetabolous insects as its homolog has a similar role in Blatella germanica. Taken together, our results suggest that the sequential expression of the transcription factors Chinmo, Br-C and E93 during larva, pupa an adult respectively, coordinate the formation of the different organs that constitute the adult organism.

Editor's evaluation

This important study demonstrates that the transcription factor Chinmo is a master regulator that maintains larval growth and development as part of the metamorphic gene network in Drosophila. Chinmo does so in part by regulating Broad expression in imaginal tissues (e.g. eye and wing discs) and in a Broad-independent manner in other larval tissues such as the salivary glands and larval trachea. Finally, the authors demonstrate that the role of Chinmo in promoting larval development is conserved between holometabolous insects and hemimetabolous insects, which lack a pupal stage. The data were collected and analyzed using solid and validated methodology and will be of interest to a broad audience including those interested in development and evolution.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84648.sa0

eLife digest

Egg, larva, pupa, adult: the life of many insects is structured around these four well-defined stages of development. After hatching, the larva grows until it reaches a certain size; when the right conditions are met, it then becomes a pupa and metamorphoses into an adult. Most larval cells die during metamorphosis; only a group known as imaginal cells survives, dividing and maturing to create pupal and adult tissues.

Each of these developmental steps are linked to a particular genetic program deployed in response to a single stage-specifying gene. For instance, the activation of the Br-C gene triggers the transition from larva to pupa, while E93 initiates the transformation of the pupa into an adult. However, which stage-specifying gene controls larval identity remains unclear. Recent studies suggest that in fruit flies, a gene known as chinmo could be playing this role.

In response, Chafino et al. explored how chinmo shapes the development of fruit fly larvae. The experiments showed that chinmo is activated in the juvenile stage, and that it is required for the larvae to grow properly and for larval and imaginal tissues to form. Conversely, it must be switched off for the insect to become a pupa and then an adult. Further work suggested that the role of chinmo as a larval specifier could have emerged early in insect evolution.

Moreover, Chafino et al. revealed that chinmo could repress Br-C, an important characteristic since stage-specifying genes usually switch on sequentially by regulating each other. A closer look suggested that, in imaginal cells, chinmo promotes development by inhibiting Br-C; in larval cells, however, chinmo not only has a Brc-repressing role but it is also necessary for larval cells to grow. Additional experiments exploring the role of the stage-specifying genes in tumor formation showed that chinmo promotes cells proliferation while Br-C and E93 had tumor-suppressing properties.

Overall, the work by Chafino et al. sheds new light on the genetic control of insect development, while also potentially providing a new perspective on how genes related to chinmo and Br-C contribute to the emergence of human cancers.

Introduction

Animal development passes through various stages characterised by distinct morphological and molecular changes. In humans, for instance, development continues from birth through to childhood and puberty to give rise to the adult form. As in many animals, in holometabolous insects such as Drosophila melanogaster, the developmental stages are sharply defined: embryogenesis gives rise to the larva, a juvenile stage, which, upon different rounds of growth and moulting, brings about a new stage structure, the pupa, when most of the larval cells die and the adult progenitor cells (imaginal cells) develop to generate the adult organism. The regulation of stage-specific differences is mediated by the action of two major developmental hormones, the steroid 20-hydroxyecdysone and the terpenoid juvenile hormone (Hiruma and Kaneko, 2013; Jindra et al., 2013; Truman, 2019; Truman and Riddiford, 2007; Truman and Riddiford, 2002; Yamanaka et al., 2013). Both hormones exert this precise developmental control by regulating the expression of three critical genes that encode for the stage-identity factors that compose the metamorphic gene network: the C2H2 zinc finger type factor Krüppel-homolog 1 (Kr-h1), the helix-turn-helix Ecdysone inducible protein 93F (E93), and Broad-complex (Br-C; also known as broad), a member of the bric-a-brac-tramtrack-broad family (Martín et al., 2021).

The deployment of the pupal-specific genetic program is controlled by the expression of Br-C at the larval-pupal transition (Truman, 2019; Zhou and Riddiford, 2002). Upon the formation of the pupa, hormone signalling triggers the expression of the helix-turn-helix factor E93, whose product represses Br-C expression and directs the formation of the final differentiated adult structures (Chafino et al., 2019; Martín et al., 2021; Ureña et al., 2014). While it is firmly established that Br-C and E93 are the stage-specifying genes for the pupal and adult states, the nature of the larval specifying gene has been elusive. To date, larval identity has been attributed to Kr-h1, which is present during the larval period and represses Br-C and E93 expression during this period (Huang et al., 2011; Ureña et al., 2016). However, although Kr-h1 is undoubtedly critical for maintaining the larval state, evidence has shown that this factor cannot be considered the larval specifier per se. For example, depletion of Kr-h1 in Drosophila does not prevent normal larval development nor a timely transition to the pupa (Beck et al., 2004; Pecasse et al., 2000). In this regard, the product of chronologically inappropriate morphogenesis (chinmo) gene, another member of the BTB family of transcription factors, has been recently proposed to be responsible for larval identity in Drosophila (Truman and Riddiford, 2022).

First isolated based on its requirement for the temporal identity of mushroom body neurons (Zhu et al., 2006), the identification of Chinmo as a more general larval specifier has provided invaluable insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the control of juvenile identity. Yet, little is known about how this factor exerts its function along with Br-C and E93. Moreover, given that holometabolous insects are comprised of both larval tissues and pools of adult progenitor cells (known as imaginal cells), a central issue in the understanding of how larval identity is controlled is how larval and imaginal cells respond differentially to the same set of temporal transcription factors. Furthermore, in the sequential activation of chinmo, Br-C, and E93, the extent of the activity directly attributable to each transcription factor or to their mutual repression is still unclear.

Here, we confirm the role of chinmo as larval specifier in larval and imaginal cells and establish its regulatory interactions with the other temporal specifiers. We also examine how the temporal sequence of Chinmo and Br-C differently affects with the genetic program that establishes larval vs. imaginal identity. Thus, we found that Chinmo controls larval development of larval and imaginal tissues in a Br-C-independent and -dependent manner, respectively. According to these data, and in the context of the metamorphic gene network, we also show that chinmo absence is critical for the transition from larva to pupa and then to adult, as it acts as a repressor of both Br-C and E93. In addition, we report that the chinmo homologue has a similar role in the cockroach Blattella germanica, thereby indicating that its function as a juvenile specifier precedes the hemimetabolous/holometabolous split. Finally, we show that in contrast to the well-characterised role of chinmo as a pro-oncogene, the Br-C pupal and E93 adult specifiers act mainly as tumour suppressor genes. These characteristics are maintained beyond insects and may account for the different role of some human BTB-zinc finger transcription factors in tumourigenesis.

Results and discussion

chinmo is expressed throughout larval stages and is required in larval and imaginal tissues

Examination of chinmo expression revealed that it is expressed during embryogenesis and early larval development and that it is strongly downregulated from L3 (Figure 1A). Immunostaining analysis in imaginal and larval tissues confirmed the presence of Chinmo in L1 and L2 stages and its disappearance in late L3 (Figure 1B and C), an expression profile that is in agreement with previous studies (Narbonne-Reveau and Maurange, 2019; Truman and Riddiford, 2022). We next addressed its functional requirement by knocking down this factor with an RNAi transgene controlled by the ubiquitous Act-Gal4 driver. chinmo-depleted animals showed developmental arrest at the end of the first instar larval stage presenting a tanned cuticle clearly reminiscent of the tanned larval cuticle of the puparium (Figure 1D). Consistent with the phenotype, we found that arrested chinmo-depleted larvae precociously expressed pupal cuticle genes while blocked larval-specific genes activation (Figure 1E). These results confirm that chinmo is required for normal progression of the organism during the larval period, as proposed by Truman and Riddiford, 2022.

Figure 1
Download asset Open asset
Chinmo is expressed during early larval stages and is essential for proper larval development.

(A) chinmo mRNA levels measured by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) from embryo to the wandering stage of L3 (L3W). Transcript abundance values were normalised against the Rpl32 transcript. Fold changes were relative to the expression of embryo, arbitrarily set to 1. Error bars indicate the SEM (n = 3). (B–C) Chinmo protein levels in the wing disc (B) and salivary glands (C) of larval L1, L2, and L3W (females) stages. (D) Compared with the control (Act-Gal4), overexpression of UAS chinmoRNAi in the whole body induced developmental arrest at the L1 stage. Scale bars represent 50 µm (B and C) and 0.5 mm (D). (E) Relative expression of larval-specific (Crp47Eg, Lcp65Ag3, and CG30457) and pupal-specific genes (Edg78E) in UAS-chinmoRNAi L1 larvae measured by qRT-PCR. Transcript abundance values were normalised against the Rpl32 transcript. Fold changes were relative to the expression in control larvae, arbitrarily set to 1 (dashed black line). Error bars indicate the SEM (n = 3). Statistical significance was calculated using t test (***p≤0.001; **p≤0.005).

Figure 1—source data 1

Numerical data for Figure 1A and E.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/84648/elife-84648-fig1-data1-v2.xlsx

Since Drosophila larva consists of a combination of larval and imaginal tissues, we then analysed the contribution of chinmo to the development of these two types of tissues. Regarding the former, chinmo was selectively depleted in the salivary glands using the forkhead (fkh) driver (fkh-Gal4), which is active in this tissue from embryogenesis onwards. The salivary glands are a secretory organ that develops from embryonic epithelial placodes (Abrams et al., 2003; Bradley et al., 2001; Edgar et al., 2014; Zielke et al., 2013). This tissue is responsible for producing glycosylated mucin for the lubrication of food during the larval period (Costantino et al., 2008; Farkaš et al., 2014; Riddiford, 1993; Syed et al., 2008) and for synthesising glue proteins for the attachment of the pupa to a solid surface at the onset of metamorphosis (Andres et al., 1993; Costantino et al., 2008; Kaieda et al., 2017). As it is shown in Figure 2A, although depletion of chinmo in the salivary glands did not affect the formation of this organ, it caused a dramatic decrease in normal larval development, as revealed by the strong reduction in size and DNA content of the gland cells (Figure 2B–D). Consistently, the expression levels of both early and late specific salivary gland protein encoding genes, such as new glue 1–3 (ng) and Salivary gland secretion (Sgs), were virtually undetectable in chinmo-depleted salivary glands compared to control (Figure 2E). Remarkably, to further study the requirement of chinmo for larval tissue growth, we analyzed the role of this factor in the larval tracheal system. Although depletion of chinmo specifically in the tracheal cells, using a trh-Gal4 driver, resulted in many arrested L2 larvae with a necrotic tracheal system, escapers that reached L3 presented reduction in nuclear size and DNA content of tracheal cells as well as reduced length of the organ (Figure 2—figure supplement 1), thus confirming that Chinmo is required for proper growth of larval tissues.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Chinmo is required for proper growth and function of the salivary glands during larval development.

(A) DAPI staining of salivary glands from control (fkh-Gal4) and UAS-chinmoRNAi larvae at L3W. Scale bar represents 50 µm. (B–D) Comparison of the relative size of salivary glands (n = 10 for each genotype) (B), DAPI intensity (n = 50 for each genotype) (C), and nucleic size of salivary glands (n = 50 for each genotype) (D) between UAS-chinmoRNAi and control larvae at L3W. Error bars indicate the SEM (n = 5–8). (E) Relative expression of ng1-3 and Salivary glands secretion genes (Sgs) in UAS-chinmoRNAi L3W animals measured by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Transcript abundance values were normalised against the Rpl32 transcript. Error bars indicate the SEM (n = 5–8). Statistical significance was calculated using t test (***p≤0.001).

Figure 2—source data 1

Numerical data for Figure 2B–E.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/84648/elife-84648-fig2-data1-v2.xlsx

Regarding the role of chinmo in imaginal tissues, we knocked down this factor in the pouch region of wing imaginal discs from the embryonic period onwards using the escargot (esg) driver (esg-Gal4). As before, depletion of chinmo in the esg domain did not alter the specification of the disc, but strongly impeded its larval development. Thus, in late L3 wing discs only the notum, which does not express the esg-Gal4 driver, was observed while the wing pouch, revealed by positive GFP signal, was strongly reduced and did not show the expression of patterning genes such as wingless (wg) and cut (ct) (Figure 3A). In line with these results, although most of the chinmo-depleted animals arrested development as pharate adults, escapers that were able to eclose (15%) had no wings (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). Similarly, depletion of chinmo in the eye disc using a specific driver (ey-Gal4) induced similar effects abolishing the developing tissue and the formation of the adult eye (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). Taken together, these data show that Chinmo is required during the larval period to control the development and function of larval and imaginal tissues.

Figure 3 with 2 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Chinmo is necessary for wing development during the larval period.

Expression of Ct and Wg in wing discs of control (esg-Gal4) and UAS-chinmoRNAi L3W larvae. Wing discs were labelled to visualise the esg domain (GFP in green) and nuclei (DAPI). Ct and Wg were not detected in UAS-chinmoRNAi. Scale bars represent 50µm.

Distinct roles of Chinmo in larval and progenitor cells

A critical feature of the metamorphic gene network factors is that their sequential expression is achieved through a series of regulatory interactions between them. Therefore, we next sought to characterise the regulatory interactions of Chinmo with the pupal specifier Br-C and the adult specifier E93. To this end, we measured the expression of Br-C and E93 in chinmo-depleted salivary glands and wing discs. Contrary to recently published data (Truman and Riddiford, 2022), both tissues showed a significant and premature increase of Br-C protein levels as early as in L1 larvae, while no increase in E93 protein levels was detected in any tissue (Figure 4).

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Chinmo represses Br-C in salivary glands and wing discs during early larval development.

(A–B) Expression of Chinmo, Br-C, and E93 in salivary glands of L1 control (fkh-Gal4) (A), and UAS-chinmoRNAi (B). (C–D) Expression of Chinmo, Br-C, and E93 in wing discs of early L2 control (esg-Gal4) (C) and UAS-chinmoRNAi (D). The esg domain is marked with GFP and all cell nucleus with DAPI. In the absence of chinmo only Br-C shows early upregulation in both tissues. Scale bars represent 25 µm.

In view of these results, we speculated whether the impairment of larval development observed in chinmo-depleted animals could be the result of precocious presence of the wrong stage-identity factor, in this case, Br-C. To address this notion, we precociously expressed Br-CZ1, the main Br-C isoform expressed during imaginal larval development (Narbonne-Reveau and Maurange, 2019), in salivary glands and wing discs. As previously described, ectopic expression of Br-CZ1 blocked Chinmo activation (Narbonne-Reveau and Maurange, 2019). As a consequence, precocious upregulation of Br-C blocked development in both tissues, phenocopying the loss of function of chinmo (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). This result suggests that a fundamental function of Chinmo is to suppress the expression of the pupal specifier Br-C during the juvenile stages. To confirm this hypothesis, we simultaneously depleted chinmo and Br-C in salivary glands and wing discs. Remarkably, whereas salivary glands showed the same growth impairment observed upon chinmo depletion (Figure 5A-F, Figure 5—figure supplement 1), depletion of Br-C largely rescued the abnormalities in the wing discs caused by depletion of chinmo: the double knock-out wing discs developed in a regular manner to reach normal size by the end of L3 and showed proper expression of patterning genes such as wg (Figure 5G, Figure 5—figure supplement 2). The difference between larval and imaginal tissues was also observed in the analysis of the tracheal system and the eye imaginal disc. Whereas depletion of Br-C in the eye disc rescued the phenotype induced by the absence of chinmo (Figure 3—figure supplement 1), the larval trachea failed to restore the growth defects observed in chinmo-depleted tracheal cells (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Taken together, our results suggest that a major regulatory function of chinmo during early larval development in imaginal cells is channelled through the repression of Br-C, while in larval tissues chinmo appears to exert specific growth-related functions that are independent to Br-C repression. Thus, in the imaginal cells chinmo appears to ensure the expression of juvenile genes by repressing Br-C, a well-known inhibitor of larval gene expression (Zhou and Riddiford, 2002). In this regard, it is tempting to speculate that Br-C might repress the early expression of critical components of signaling pathways such as Wg and EGFR, involved in wing fate specification in early larval development (Ng et al., 1996; Wang et al., 2000; Zecca and Struhl, 2002). In contrast, in larval tissues chinmo seems to exert an active role promoting growth and maturation. The fact that the Br-C-dependent Sgs genes fail to be activated in absence of chinmo, when Br-C is prematurely expressed, supports this idea (Figure 2E). This different response could be explained by the nature of the larval and imaginal tissues. While larval tissues are mainly devoted to growth during the larval period and then fated to die during the metamorphic transition, the developmental identity of the imaginal cells is modified along the larva-pupa-adult temporal axis to give rise to the adult structures. This difference could also account for the distinct roles of the other members of the metamorphic gene network in larval and imaginal tissues. Thus, while Br-C is necessary for the degeneration of the larval salivary glands during the onset of the pupal period (Jiang et al., 2000), it is critical for the correct eversion of the imaginal wing disc and for the temporary G2 arrest that synchronises the cell cycle in the wing epithelium during early pupa wing elongation (Guo et al., 2016). Likewise, E93 is necessary to activate autophagy for elimination of the larval mushroom body neuroblasts in late pupae (Pahl et al., 2019), whereas it controls the terminal adult differentiation of the imaginal wing during the same period (Ureña et al., 2016; Uyehara et al., 2017).

Figure 5 with 2 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Different requirement of chinmo for the larval growth of salivary glands and wing discs.

(A) DAPI-stained salivary glands from control (fkh-Gal4) and UAS-Br-CRNAi; UAS-chinmoRNAi L3W larvae. In the absence of chinmo and Br-C, salivary glands did not grow. (B–D) Comparison of the relative size of salivary glands (n = 10 for each genotype) (B), DAPI intensity (n = 50 for each genotype) (C), and nucleic size of salivary glands (n = 30 for each genotype) (D) of control and UAS-Br-CRNAi; UAS-chinmoRNAi L3W larvae. (E–F) Relative expression of (E) ng1-3 and (F) Salivary glands secretion genes in control and UAS-Br-CRNAi; UAS-chinmoRNAi L3W larvae measured by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Transcript abundance values were normalised against the Rpl32 transcript. Error bars in B and C indicate the SEM (n = 5–8). Statistical significance was calculated using t test ( ****p≤0.001). (G) Expression of Chinmo, Br-C, and Wg in wing discs of UAS-Br-CRNAi; UAS-chinmoRNAi L3W larvae. Wing discs labelled to visualise the esg domain (GFP in green). In the absence of chinmo and Br-C, wing discs grow normally and express Wg correctly. Scale bars represent 50 µm.

Figure 5—source data 1

Numerical data for Figure 5B–F.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/84648/elife-84648-fig5-data1-v2.xlsx

Downregulation of chinmo is required during metamorphosis

The functional and expression data reported above show that Chinmo acts as a larval specifier in Drosophila. From this, we could infer that its absence by the end of larval development is required first for the transition to the prepupa, and then to allow terminal adult differentiation during the pupal period. If this were the case, maintenance of high levels of chinmo during late L3 would interfere with the larva-pupal transition. To test this possibility, we maintained high levels of chinmo in late L3 wing discs using the Gal4/Gal80ts system. Consistent with this hypothesis, overexpression of chinmo from early L3 in the anterior compartment of the disc using the cubitus interruptus ci-Gal4 driver impaired its larva-pupal transition as abolished Br-C expression and induced apoptosis at late L3 as revealed by the high expression of the effector caspase Dcp-1 (Figure 6A). As a result, the size of the anterior compartment was dramatically reduced, and the expression of patterning genes such as ct was halted (Figure 6B). Impairment of ct expression was not just a consequence of cell death, as ct expression was neither detected in wing discs overexpressing both chinmo and the p35 inhibitor of effector caspases (Hay et al., 1994; Figure 6C and D), but instead to a distinct response to the sustained expression of chinmo or to the consequent depletion of Br-C.

Figure 6
Download asset Open asset
chinmo depletion during late L3 is required for proper larva to pupa transition.

(A–H) Images of wing imaginal discs from L3W larvae. The indicated constructs were expressed under the control of the ci-Gal4 driver. Overexpression or depletion of the transgenes was activated in early L3 larvae and analyzed at the L3W stage. An UAS-GFP construct was used to mark the anterior region of the disc where the transgenes were induced or repressed (green). (A) Overexpression of chinmo repressed Br-C, induced Dcp-1, and (B) abolished Ct. (C) Overexpression of chinmo together with p35 repressed Br-C and blocked Dcp-1, but fails to restore normal expression of Ct (D). (E) Depletion of Br-C induced Chinmo and Dcp-1 and (F) repressed Ct. (G) In double depletion of Br-C and chinmo (H), Dcp-1 was not detected. Scale bars represent 50 µm.

An alternative way to keep high levels of chinmo at late L3 is by depleting Br-C, a well-known repressor of chinmo from mid L3 (Narbonne-Reveau and Maurange, 2019). Therefore, we knocked down Br-C in the anterior compartment of the wing disc and confirmed that Chinmo levels remained high in this compartment by late L3. Also, in this case we observed a strong Dcp-1 staining and impairment of ct expression (Figure 6E and F). Importantly, simultaneous depletion of chinmo and Br-C from early L3 did not lead to an increase in apoptosis (Figure 6G) nor altered the expression of patterning genes (Figure 5F), which indicates that tissue death at the end of the larval period is due to sustained expression of chinmo rather than the absence of Br-C. Altogether, these results confirm that the transition from larva to pupa must take place in the absence of the larval specifier Chinmo.

Next, we analyzed whether lack of chinmo is also important during the pupal period to allow the E93-dependent development of the adult. To this end, we used the thermo-sensitive system to overexpress chinmo in the anterior part of the wing specifically during the pupal stage. To that aim, larvae were maintained at 18°C until 12 hr after pupa formation (APF) and then shifted to 29°C to allow the Gal4 to function. The resulting ectopic expression of chinmo led to a marked decrease in E93 protein levels (Figure 7A). As a result, the anterior compartment of the wing was strongly undifferentiated, a phenotype reminiscent of that observed in E93-depleted wings (Ureña et al., 2016; Ureña et al., 2014; Figure 7B). Taken together, our results show that chinmo must be downregulated during the initiation and throughout the metamorphic transition to allow the sequential expression of the pupal specifier Br-C and the adult specifier E93.

Figure 7
Download asset Open asset
Presence of Chinmo during pupal development blocks adult differentiation.

(A) Overexpression of chinmo in the anterior part of the pupal wing at 72 hr after pupa formation (APF) using ci-Gal4 driver represses E93 expression and produced alterations in phalloidin (Pha) pattern. (B) Cuticle preparation of a pupal wing at 96 hr APF expressing chinmo under the control of the ci-Gal4 driver. Bottom panels are magnifications from upper images. The scale bars represent 50 μm (top panels) and 100 μm (bottom panels).

Antagonistic effects of chinmo and Br-C/E93 in tumour growth

Chinmo and Br-C belong to the extended family of BTB-zinc finger transcription factors, which are not restricted to insects. In humans, many such factors have been implicated in cancer, where they have opposing effects, from oncogenic to tumour suppressor functions (Siggs and Beutler, 2012). However, while overexpression of Drosophila chinmo has been found to cooperate with Ras or Notch to trigger massive tumour overgrowth (Doggett et al., 2015), changes in Drosophila Br-C expression have not been associated with any effect on tumourigenesis. Since the results described here, and those from other labs (Narbonne-Reveau and Maurange, 2019), indicate that chinmo and Br-C have antagonistic effects in terms of proliferation vs. differentiation, we addressed whether these opposite features might also be associated with pro-oncogenic or tumour suppressor properties, respectively. To test this notion, we resorted to the well-defined tumourigenesis model in Drosophila generated by the depletion of cell polarity genes such as lgl (Froldi et al., 2008; Gong et al., 2021). To downregulate lgl and generate an oncogenic sensitised background (Figure 8A, B and G), we triggered the expression of UAS-lglRNAi constructs in the imaginal wing disc pouch by means of nubbin-Gal4 (nub-Gal4) (see Materials and methods for details).

Figure 8
Download asset Open asset
Tumour suppression action of Br-C and E93.

(A–F) Confocal images of L3 wing imaginal discs. The indicated constructs were expressed under the control of the nub-Gal4 driver. An UAS-RFP construct was used to mark the pouch region of the disc where the transgenes were induced (magenta). Nuclei were labelled with DAPI (grey). Scale bars at 100 μm. (G) Volumetric quantification of the RFP-positive area of the wing discs for the indicated groups. The pouch volumes were normalised to the mean of the control. Error bars in G indicate the SEM (n = 10). Welch’s ANOVA (p<0.0001) followed by Dunnett’s T3 post hoc tests (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001).

Figure 8—source data 1

Numerical data for Figure 8G.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/84648/elife-84648-fig8-data1-v2.xlsx

Interestingly, RNAi-mediated depletion of Br-C in the wing discs in the downregulated lgl background resulted in an increase in the mean wing pouch volume compared to the downregulation of lgl alone (Figure 8B, C and G). Consistently, overexpression of Br-C in the same lgl background had the opposite effect, reducing the size of the lgl-induced overgrowth, thereby confirming that Br-C expression elicits tumour suppressor activity (Figure 8D and G). Given that E93 has a similar pro-differentiation role to that of Br-C, we examined whether E93 also exerts tumour suppressor activity. We found that overexpression of E93 also reduced the size of lgl overgrowth (Figure 8E and G). However, as E93 overexpression in the wing disc triggers extensive cell death (data not shown), we assessed whether in this case the reduction of the pouch region was caused by apoptosis induction. However, combined overexpression of E93 with the p35 inhibitor of apoptosis still lead to a reduction in the size of the wing pouch in the lgl-sensitised background (Figure 8F and G). Thus, also in this regard, chinmo and Br-C/E93 play opposite functions, chinmo with pro-oncogenic features and Br-C and E93 act as tumour suppressor genes.

Role of chinmo in hemimetabolous development

As full metamorphosis is an evolutionary acquisition of holometabolous insects from hemimetabolous ancestors with no pupal stage (Truman, 2019), we sought to determine whether the role of chinmo as a larval specifier was also present in hemimetabolous insects. To this end, we used the German cockroach B. germanica as a model for hemimetabolous development. Blattella goes through six juvenile nymphal instars (N1–N6) before developing into an adult. Metamorphosis takes place during N6 and is restricted to the transformation of the wing primordia into functional wings, the attainment of functional genitalia, and changes in cuticle pigmentation (Ureña et al., 2014).

A detailed Tblastn search in the Blattella genome database revealed the presence of a chinmo orthologue (Bg-chinmo). To study Bg-chinmo, we first examined its expression during the life cycle of Blattella. We found that it is highly expressed in embryos and decreases dramatically thereafter during nymphal development (Figure 9A). In order to analyze the function of the relative low levels of Bg-chinmo during postembryonic stages, we analysed the function of Bg-Chinmo by systemic injection of dsRNAs into newly emerged N4 instar. Specimens injected with dsMock were used as negative controls (Control animals). Importantly, whereas Control larvae underwent two nymphal molts before initiating metamorphosis at the end of the N6 stage, 43% of Bg-chinmoRNAi animals underwent only one nymphal molt before molting to an early adult after the N5 stage (Figure 9B–E). Precocious Bg-chinmo-depleted adults were smaller than control counterparts as they skipped a nymphal stage. However, they presented all the external characteristics of an adult, namely functional hind- and fore-wings, adult legs (Figure 9F), adult cerci, mature genitalia, and adult-specific cuticle pigmentation. Altogether, these results suggest that the role of Chinmo as juvenile specifier seems to be conserved in hemimetabolous insects, thereby indicating that its developmental function precedes the hemimetabolous-holometabolous split.

Figure 9
Download asset Open asset
Depletion of chinmo in B. germanica promotes premature adulthood.

(A–B) Bg-chinmo mRNA levels measured by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) from embryo to the last nymphal stage (N6) in whole body (A), and prothoracic gland (PG), and wings and elytra (B). Transcript abundance values were normalised against the Rpl32 transcript. Fold changes were relative to the expression of embryo (for whole body) or N5d0 (for PG and wings and elytra), arbitrarily set to 1. Error bars indicate the SEM (n = 3–5). (C–D) Newly moulted N4 nymphs of B. germanica were injected with dsMock (Control) or dschinmo (Bg-chinmoRNAi) and left until adulthood. (C) Dorsal view of adult Control, and (B) premature adult Bg-chinmoRNAi. (E) Quantification of wing and elytra areas (cm2) of adult Control and Bg-chinmoRNAi premature adults. Error bars indicate the SEM (n = 4–6). Statistical significance was calculated using t-test (***p≤0.001). (F) Control and Bg-chinmoRNAi wing, elytra and foreleg of newly emerged adult of B. germanica. The scale bar represents 2 mm.

Figure 9—source data 1

Numerical data for Figure 9A and D.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/84648/elife-84648-fig9-data1-v2.xlsx

In summary, we identified Chinmo as a new member of the metamorphic gene network acting as a general larval specifier, as recently proposed by Truman and Riddiford, 2022. Together with a number of previous reports (reviewed in Martín et al., 2021), our results show that the temporal expression of Chinmo, Br-C, and E93 determines the tissue acquisition of gradual differentiation features from the juvenile to the adult to generate the distinct organs. Whereas Chinmo maintains cells in an undifferentiated state, Br-C and E93 induce progressively the differentiation program. This effect has already been shown in the central nervous system where early-born neurons are characterised by the expression of Chinmo, whereas smaller late-born neurons are marked by expression of Br-C (Maurange et al., 2008). Similarly, the chinmo-to-Br-C transition in Drosophila has been associated with the loss of the regenerative potential of imaginal cells (Narbonne-Reveau and Maurange, 2019). The fact that Br-C and E93 act as a tumour suppressor in an overproliferative background supports this idea.

Finally, we found that the role of chinmo as larval specifier is conserved in hemimetabolous insects. Since hemimetabolous insects do not undergo the intermediate pupal stage, the transition from juvenile to adult, therefore, relies mainly on the shift from Chinmo to E93 during the last nymphal stage, with Kr-h1 also involved in preventing metamorphosis through the repression of E93 (Ureña et al., 2016). However, although in hemimetabolans insects depletion of Br-C does not impair metamorphosis, Br-C does regulate the progressive growth of the metamorphic tissues, such as the wing pads and the dorsal thorax (Erezyilmaz et al., 2006; Fernandez-Nicolas et al., 2022; Huang et al., 2013; Konopova et al., 2011). This observation suggests that a premetamorphic role of Br-C was already present in hemimetabolous insects, acquiring an additional metamorphic role as pupal specifier during the evolution of holometabolous insects.

Materials and methods

Fly strains

Request a detailed protocol

All fly stocks were reared at 25°C on standard flour/agar Drosophila media. The Gal4/UAS system was used to drive the expression of transgenes at 29°C. Gal4/Gal80ts system was used for conditional activation. In these experiments, crosses were kept at 18 until L2 or L3-late molt and then shifted to 29°C for conditional induction. The following strains used in this study were provided by the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (BDSC): fkh-Gal4 (#78060); Act-Gal4 (#3954); Tub-Gal80ts (#7016), UAS-chinmoRNAi (#26777); UAS-chinmo (#50740); UAS-Br-CRNAi (#51378); UAS-p35 (#5072); UAS-myr-mRFP (#7118); and UAS-mCD8::GFP (#32186) were used to follow the GAL4 driver activity. trh-Gal4 (Kondo and Hayashi, 2013) and ey-Gal4 (#8227) were used to drive the expression of distinct constructs in the trachea and eye disc, respectively. A recombinant stock containing UAS-lgl-RNAi51247 and UAS-lgl-RNAi51249 (third chromosome) was used to generate the tumours (Daniel et al., 2018). nub-Gal4 (Calleja et al., 1996), esg-Gal4, UAS-GFP (Jiang et al., 2009), and ci-Gal4 (Croker et al., 2006) were used to drive the expression of different constructs in the wing disc. Crosses to CantonS line were used as control.

B. germanica

Request a detailed protocol

Specimens of B. germanica were obtained from a colony reared in the dark at 30 ± 1°C and 60–70% relative humidity. Cockroaches undergo hemimetabolous development, where growth and maturation take place gradually and simultaneously during a series of nymphal instars. In our rearing conditions, B. germanica undergoes six nymphal instars (N1–N6) before molting into the adult. All dissections and tissue sampling were carried out on carbon dioxide anesthetised specimens.

Immunohistochemistry

Request a detailed protocol

For fluorescent imaging, salivary glands, wing discs from different juvenile stages and pupal wings were dissected in 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 20 min at RT. The tissues were rinsed in 0.1% Triton X-100 (PBST) or 0.3% PBST in pupal wings for 1 hr and incubated at 4°C with primary antibodies diluted in PBST overnight. After incubation with primary antibodies, the tissues were washed with PBST (3×10 min washes) and incubated with adequate combinations of secondary antibodies (Alexa Conjugated dyes 488, 555, 647, Life Technologies, 1:500) for 2 hr at RT, followed by 3×10 min washes with PBST, and then rinsed with PBS before mounting in Vectashield with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, H1200) for image acquisition. The following primary antibodies were used at indicated dilution: rat anti-Chinmo (1:500, N, Sokol), mouse anti-Cut (1:200, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB) #2B10), mouse anti-Wg (1:200, DSHB #4D4), mouse anti Br-C core (1:250 DSHB #25E9.D7), rabbit anti-cleaved Dcp-1 (1:100, Cell Signaling #9578), and rabbit anti-E93 (1:50, this work).

Antibody generation

Request a detailed protocol

A peptide corresponding to the 23 residues (GRRAYSEEDLSRALQDVVANKL) of E93 was coupled to KLH and was injected into rabbits. Polyclonal antisera were affinity-purified and were found to be specific for E93, by western blotting and by immunofluorescence.

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction

Request a detailed protocol

Total RNA was isolated with the GenElute Mammalian Total RNA kit (Sigma), DNAse treated (Promega) and reverse transcribed with Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and random hexamers (Promega). In the case of Drosophila, cDNA was obtained from whole larvae (CantonS) or L3 wandering salivary glands. B. germanica cDNAs were obtained from whole nymphs or wings and prothoracic gland (PG) of different juvenile instars. All the samples were collected from females except in the case of L1 and L2 tissues. Relative transcripts levels were determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (quantitative PCR [qPCR]), using iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad). To standardise the qPCR inputs, a master mix that contained iTaq Universal SYBR Green PCR Supermix and forward and reverse primers was prepared (final concentration: 100 nM/qPCR). The qPCR experiments were conducted with the same quantity of tissue equivalent input for all treatments and each sample was run in duplicate using 2 μl of cDNA per reaction. All the samples were analyzed on the iCycler iQ Real Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). RNA expression was calculated in relation to the expression of DmRpl32 or BgActin5C. Primers sequences for qPCR analyses were (Duan et al., 2020):

  • Dm-chinmo-F: 5’ AGTTCTGCCTCAAATGGAACAG’3

  • Dm-chinmo-R: 5’ CGCAGGATAATATGACATCGGC’3

  • Dm-Sgs1- F: 5’CCCAATCCCGTGTGGCCCTG’3

  • Dm-Sgs1- R: 5’ GTGATGGCAACGGCGGTGGT’3

  • Dm-Sgs3- F: 5’ TGCTACCGCCCTAGCGAGCA’3

  • Dm-Sgs3- R: 5’ GTGCACGGAGGTTGCGTGGT’3

  • Dm-Sgs4- F: 5’ ACGCATCAAGCGACACCGCA’3

  • Dm-Sgs4- R: 5’TCCTCCACCGCCCGATTCGT’3

  • Dm-Sgs7- F: 5’ CGCAGTCACCATCATCGCTTGC’3

  • Dm-Sgs7- R: 5’ACAGCCCGTGCAGGCCTTTC’3

  • Dm-Sgs8-F: 5’ AGCTGCTCGTTGTCGCCGTC’3

  • Dm-Sgs8-R: 5’ GCGGAACACCCAGGACACGG’3

  • Dm-ng1 and Dmng2-F: 5’- CACTATAAGCGAAAGGTCAAGAG-3’

  • Dm-ng1-R: 5’- TGGATCTTTCATTCATCGGATCT-3’

  • Dm-ng2-R: 5’- TCTTCCGATCTGCGGTTTCTAC-3’

  • Dm-ng3-F: 5’- GATACGACATATCTATAGGCACAA-3’

  • Dm-ng3-R: 5’- CACTGCTGCTACTGCTGCTACT-3’

  • Dm-RpL32-F: 5’CAAGAAGTTCCTGGTGCACAA’3

  • Dm-RpL32-R: 5’AAACGCGGTTCTGCATGAG’3

  • Bg-Chinmo-F: 5’ CAGCACCACTATGTCCAAGTG’3

  • Bg-Chinmo-R: 5’ CAGGAAACTGGAGAGGCTTTC’3

  • Bg-Actin5C-F: 5’-AGCTTCCTGATGGTCAGGTGA-3’

  • Bg-Actin5C-R: 5’-TGTCGGCAATTCCAGGGTACATGGT-3’

RNA interference

Request a detailed protocol

RNA interference (RNAi) in vivo in nymphs was performed as previously described (Cruz et al., 2007; Martín et al., 2006). A dose of 1 µl (4–8 µg/µl) of the dsRNA solution was injected into the abdomen of newly antepenultimate (N4d0) instar nymphs, and left until analysed. To promote the RNAi effect, the same dose of dsRNAs was reapplied to all treated animals after 3 days (N4d3) from the first injection. Control dsRNA consisted of a non-coding sequence from the pSTBlue-1 vector (dsControl). The primers used to generate templates via PCR for transcription of the dsRNA were:

  • Bg-chinmo-F: 5’CAGCACCACTATGTCCAAGTG’3

  • Bg-chinmo-R: 5’GAGTCCTGCATGGCTTCGGA’3

Imaging acquisition and analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Images were obtained with the Leica TCS SP5 and the Zeiss LSM880 and LSM780 confocal microscopes. The same imaging acquisition parameters were used for all the comparative analyses. Images were processed with the Imaris Software (Oxford Instruments), Fiji, or Photoshop CS4 (Adobe). For DNA quantification and nuclear size of salivary glands, DNA staining intensity in the salivary glands and tracheal cells was obtained from z stacked images every 0.25 μm of DAPI-stained L3 larvae. Image analysis was performed using Fiji. For the volumetric calculation of the wing pouch region in Imaris software (Oxford Instruments), the regions of interest were selected based on the RFP fluorescence (induced by nub-Gal4) in confocal stacks that included the whole disc. The surface function of Imaris was used to segment the wing pouch and the surface volume was calculated by the software. Adult flies, nymphal parts, and adult cockroach images were acquired using AxioImager.Z1 (ApoTome 213 System, Zeiss) microscope, and images were subsequently processed using Photoshop CS4 (Adobe).

Statistical analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Statistical analysis and graphical representations were performed in GraphPad Prism 9 software. All experiments were performed with at least three biological replicates. Two-tailed Student’s test and Welch’s ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s T3 post hoc tests were used to determine significant differences.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file. Source Data files have been provided for Figures 1 A and E (Figure1- SourceData1), Figure 2B, C, D and E (Figure2-SourceData1), Figure 5 B, C , D, E and F (Figure5-SourceData1), Figure 8G (Figure8-SourceData1), Figure 9 A and D (Figure9-SourceData1) and Figure2-figure suplement 1 D, E and F (Figure2-figure suplement 1-SourceData1).

References

  37. Book
    1. Riddiford LM
    (1993)
    The Development of Drosophila Melanogaster
    Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Decision letter

  1. Vilaiwan M Fernandes
    Reviewing Editor; University College London, United Kingdom
  2. Claude Desplan
    Senior Editor; New York University, United States
  3. James W Truman
    Reviewer; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, United States

Our editorial process produces two outputs: (i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; (ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Antagonistic role of the BTB-zinc finger transcription factors Chinmo and Broad in the juvenile/pupal transition and in growth control" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 2 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Claude Desplan as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in the review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: James W Truman (Reviewer #2).

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions and clarifications of reviewer feedback

1. Please test the relationship between Chinmo and Broad in imaginal/larval tissues (in addition to the wing disc and salivary glands, which are provided in the manuscript). The reviewers felt this would strengthen the authors' claim that Chinmo promotes larval development in a Br-C-dependent manner in imaginal tissues and a Br-C-independent manner in other larval tissues.

2. Related to point 2 raised by Reviewer #2, following the consultation session, the reviewers agreed that the role of ecdysone and EcR in the transition from Chinmo to Broad is of obvious interest, but that the manuscript stands well without this additional information. While it would be interesting to know if larval cells show a similar transition time and dependence on EcR (perhaps by using an EcR-DN under conditional GAL-80 control) this information does not impact the main message of the manuscript and is therefore not essential.

3. Regarding sex-specific regulation of Chinmo (point 3 raised by reviewer#2), following the consultation session, the reviewers have asked that the figure legend and methods relating to Figure 1 be revised to clarify which sex was used throughout the study.

4. There are some discrepancies with the model that Chinmo promotes larval development and represses the larval-to-pupal transition in larval tissues independently of Broad (see specific reviewer comments) since salivary glands lacking chinmo would be expected to express higher rather than lower levels of sgs genes. This discrepancy may relate to the reduced size of the tissue. It is therefore possible that Chinmo may feed into two parallel pathways, one to regulate growth independently of Broad and the other involving Broad to regulate premetamorphic changes.

- Please examine early larval salivary gland proteins such as ng-1 to -3 that are expressed in salivary glands before the critical weight. Also, it would be interesting if the appearance of the SGS proteins after chinmo knock-down (Figure 5E) is abolished by simultaneous knock-down of broad.

5. Please amend the text to include further consideration of the role of Broad in hemimetabolous insects in light of other publications (see comments from reviewer #3 for more details).

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

Please accept these manuscript comments, which include experimental suggestions as well as minor spelling errors:

1. In the legend for Figure 1E, the larval stage isolated at the time of qPCR should be reported.

2. In Figure 1F, the staining of Br-C and Chinmo in L3W wing discs should be repeated with proper controls included: control wing discs, UAS-chinmoRNAi with an additional "control" UAS-line such as UAS-laczRNAi. The latter should be included since the stated conclusion of this experiment is that wing disc growth requires the absence of Br-C until the L3W stage. The restoration of normal growth in the experiment shown could be a result of attenuated Chinmo depletion due to the presence of a 3rd UAS construct (there is already a UAS-GFP in the background).

3. For similar reasons stated above, the following experiments/figures should be shown with proper controls:

– Figure 5A (single knockdowns of Br-C or chinmo, each with UAS control);

– Figure 5F (control wing disc staining, as well as UAS-chinmoRNAi with a UAS control).

4. Control stainings should be included for:

– Br-C and Ct staining in control wing discs are not shown in any figures and should be included in experimental controls for each figure where this staining appears (e.g., Fig6);

– Same comment for E93 in Fig7.

5. Stage of animals used to assess SG gene expression in Figure 2E should be reported.

6. In Figure 4, unique subfigure letters for each genotype would aid analysis/reading.

7. Unique figure letters for each graph in 9A would aid reader analysis. Also, the "PG" and "wing and elytra" graphs should each include a y-axis label.

8. In the text description of the esgGal4 driver (lines 150-151), I suggest revising it to the following: "…we knocked down this factor in the pouch region of wing imaginal discs…"

9. In line 181, there is a minor typo. Would revise it to "As a consequence, precocious upregulation of Br-C blocked development in both tissues, phenocopying the loss of chinmo.

10. In lines 205-213, literature evidence is presented to bolster the notion that MGN factors can exert different functions depending on the tissue, as they demonstrate Chinmo acting in both Br-C-dependent and independent manners to promote larval development. I'm not sure that I logically follow this argument and I don't think it strengthens the previous statement. If it is possible to clarify the argument then I support that, but otherwise, I would suggest removing this portion of the text.

11. In line 282, remove the word "also"

12. In lines 315-317, the authors describe phenotypes that are preserved in the absence of Bg-chinmo (Figure 9). I recommend including representative images that show that the mentioned adult structures are preserved in Bg-chinmoRNAi.

13. In line 335, there is a typo in the word "background".

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

Overall, the paper is a very nice piece of work. Besides my comments in the Public Review, there are a couple of general issues in the presentation. One is that through the text and figures the authors might use FlyBase terminology for the different genetic constructs: "UAS-chinmo" rather than "UASChinmo", nub-GAL4 rather than nubGal4, and esg-GAL4, UAS-GFP" rather than "esgGal4UASGFP" (ln 359).

A second general issue is that the font for the labels on some of the confocal images is so small that it is unreadable (Figure 4, 5F, 6, 7, and 8A)

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84648.sa1

Author response

Essential revisions and clarifications of reviewer feedback

1. Please test the relationship between Chinmo and Broad in imaginal/larval tissues (in addition to the wing disc and salivary glands, which are provided in the manuscript). The reviewers felt this would strengthen the authors' claim that Chinmo promotes larval development in a Br-C-dependent manner in imaginal tissues and a Br-C-independent manner in other larval tissues.

We have analysed the role of chinmo in two additional tissues as suggested by the referees and the editorial board. The larval tracheal system as an additional larval tissue and the eye disc as another imaginal tissue. Confirming the results obtained in the salivary glands and wing discs, we found that chinmo promotes development in the eye imaginal disc by repressing precocious expression of Br-C, whereas in the larval trachea, in addition to the Br-C repression, induces tracheal growth. We generated two Figures supplement with the new results and added the data in the main text. (Please see the complete explanation below).

2. Related to point 2 raised by Reviewer #2, following the consultation session, the reviewers agreed that the role of ecdysone and EcR in the transition from Chinmo to Broad is of obvious interest, but that the manuscript stands well without this additional information. While it would be interesting to know if larval cells show a similar transition time and dependence on EcR (perhaps by using an EcR-DN under conditional GAL-80 control) this information does not impact the main message of the manuscript and is therefore not essential.

We agree with the editor that the analysis of ecdysone signalling, although of interest, would not substantially modify the message of the manuscript and, therefore, we did not address it (Please see the complete explanation below).

3. Regarding sex-specific regulation of Chinmo (point 3 raised by reviewer#2), following the consultation session, the reviewers have asked that the figure legend and methods relating to Figure 1 be revised to clarify which sex was used throughout the study.

We have performed the measurements of chinmo expression always in females when sex identification was possible, namely in L3. In L1 and L2 larvae, sex identification was not possible in our conditions. Nevertheless, we think that there are evidences that suggest that chinmo does not have a significant role in sex difference growth rate during larval development, when precisely male and female growth differences have been reported (Please see the complete explanation below).

4. There are some discrepancies with the model that Chinmo promotes larval development and represses the larval-to-pupal transition in larval tissues independently of Broad (see specific reviewer comments) since salivary glands lacking chinmo would be expected to express higher rather than lower levels of sgs genes. This discrepancy may relate to the reduced size of the tissue. It is therefore possible that Chinmo may feed into two parallel pathways, one to regulate growth independently of Broad and the other involving Broad to regulate premetamorphic changes.

- Please examine early larval salivary gland proteins such as ng-1 to -3 that are expressed in salivary glands before the critical weight. Also, it would be interesting if the appearance of the SGS proteins after chinmo knock-down (Figure 5E) is abolished by simultaneous knock-down of broad.

We measured the expression levels of early larval salivary gland protein ng-1, -2 and -3 genes in chinmo and in chinmo and Br-C depleted animals. As happens to be the case also for Sgs genes, the expression levels of those genes were virtually undetectable in both conditions, suggesting that chinmo is required for SG growth and maturation. (Please see the complete explanation below).

5. Please amend the text to include further consideration of the role of Broad in hemimetabolous insects in light of other publications (see comments from reviewer #3 for more details).

We clarified the role of Br-C in hemimetabolous insects in the main text as suggested.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

Please accept these manuscript comments, which include experimental suggestions as well as minor spelling errors:

1. In the legend for Figure 1E, the larval stage isolated at the time of qPCR should be reported.

This information was already reported in the figure legends of Figure 1: “qPCR was performed from SG dissected at L1 larva”.

2. In Figure 1F, the staining of Br-C and Chinmo in L3W wing discs should be repeated with proper controls included: control wing discs, UAS-chinmoRNAi with an additional "control" UAS-line such as UAS-laczRNAi. The latter should be included since the stated conclusion of this experiment is that wing disc growth requires the absence of Br-C until the L3W stage. The restoration of normal growth in the experiment shown could be a result of attenuated Chinmo depletion due to the presence of a 3rd UAS construct (there is already a UAS-GFP in the background).

We think that the referee refers to Figure 5F and not Figure1F as there is no such panel 1F in the Figure 1. In any case, we understand the concern of the referee regarding the strength of the Gal4 with multiple UAS transgenes. For this reason, we provide a staining of Br-C and Chinmo in the double knockdown in Figure 5F to prove that the downregulation of each gene is indeed effective. The same control of RNAi effectiveness was performed for the SG. We added the staining of Br-C and Chinmo in depleted SGs in a new Figure 5—figure supplement 1. In summary, we believe that measuring the decay of protein levels in each experimental condition is a strong enough evidence of the RNAi efficiency.

3. For similar reasons stated above, the following experiments/figures should be shown with proper controls:

– Figure 5A (single knockdowns of Br-C or chinmo, each with UAS control);

– Figure 5F (control wing disc staining, as well as UAS-chinmoRNAi with a UAS control).

As in the previous point, we think that staining for Br-C and Chinmo in the SG is a good enough control to show the efficiency of the RNAi. Importantly, the double knockdown of Br-C and chinmo is not able to rescue the chinmo RNAi alone. This observation supports the idea that the double UAS is not reducing the effectiveness of the RNAi, as, otherwise, we should observe a different phenotype. Nevertheless, as we did for the imaginal disc, we measured the expression of Br-C and Chinmo in a double knockdown SGs. Under these conditions we were not able to detect neither Chinmo nor Br-C demonstrating that both RNAis work properly. We added this data in a new Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

For the experiment presented in panel F of Figure 5, we generated a new Figure 5—figure supplement 2 with the staining of Chinmo, Br-C and Wg in Control wing discs.

4. Control stainings should be included for:

– Br-C and Ct staining in control wing discs are not shown in any figures and should be included in experimental controls for each figure where this staining appears (e.g., Fig6);

– Same comment for E93 in Fig7.

Control Ct staining is shown in Figure 3. In Figures 6 and 7 all the experiments were performed with internal controls. We used the cubitus interruptus driver (ci-Gal4), which is only expressed in the anterior compartment of the larval disc or pupal wing. Therefore, wild type expression of the different markers is provided in these two figures in the posterior compartment. For this reason, we think that it is redundant and confusing to add the expression of the different markers analysed in a wild type disc in those special conditions.

5. Stage of animals used to assess SG gene expression in Figure 2E should be reported.

SGs were dissected from L3W larva. We have added this information in the new Figure 2 legend.

6. In Figure 4, unique subfigure letters for each genotype would aid analysis/reading.

We labelled each genotype with a letter as suggested.

7. Unique figure letters for each graph in 9A would aid reader analysis. Also, the "PG" and "wing and elytra" graphs should each include a y-axis label.

We modified the figure as suggested.

8. In the text description of the esgGal4 driver (lines 150-151), I suggest revising it to the following: "…we knocked down this factor in the pouch region of wing imaginal discs…"

We modified the sentence as suggested.

9. In line 181, there is a minor typo. Would revise it to "As a consequence, precocious upregulation of Br-C blocked development in both tissues, phenocopying the loss of chinmo.

We modified the sentence as suggested.

10. In lines 205-213, literature evidence is presented to bolster the notion that MGN factors can exert different functions depending on the tissue, as they demonstrate Chinmo acting in both Br-C-dependent and independent manners to promote larval development. I'm not sure that I logically follow this argument and I don't think it strengthens the previous statement. If it is possible to clarify the argument then I support that, but otherwise, I would suggest removing this portion of the text.

We clarified this point in the main text.

11. In line 282, remove the word "also"

We modified the sentence as suggested.

12. In lines 315-317, the authors describe phenotypes that are preserved in the absence of Bg-chinmo (Figure 9). I recommend including representative images that show that the mentioned adult structures are preserved in Bg-chinmoRNAi.

We included the adult structure of a wing, elytrum and leg of Control and Bg-chinmoRNAi animals in a remodelled Figure 9 to better show the premature metamorphosis observed upon Bg-Chinmo depletion.

13. In line 335, there is a typo in the word "background".

We fixed the typo mistake.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

Overall, the paper is a very nice piece of work. Besides my comments in the Public Review, there are a couple of general issues in the presentation. One is that through the text and figures the authors might use FlyBase terminology for the different genetic constructs: "UAS-chinmo" rather than "UASChinmo", nub-GAL4 rather than nubGal4, and esg-GAL4, UAS-GFP" rather than "esgGal4UASGFP" (ln 359).

A second general issue is that the font for the labels on some of the confocal images is so small that it is unreadable (Figure 4, 5F, 6, 7, and 8A)

We increased the font labels of the Figures to make them more visible.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84648.sa2

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sílvia Chafino

    1. Institut de Biologia Molecular de Barcelona (CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
    2. Institute of Evolutionary Biology (IBE, CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Barcelona, Spain
    3. Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Institute for Research in Biomedicine, IRB Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9679-0622

  2. Panagiotis Giannios

    1. Institut de Biologia Molecular de Barcelona (CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
    2. Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Institute for Research in Biomedicine, IRB Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7881-1431

  3. Jordi Casanova

    1. Institut de Biologia Molecular de Barcelona (CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
    2. Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Institute for Research in Biomedicine, IRB Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Project administration, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6121-8589

  4. David Martín

    Institute of Evolutionary Biology (IBE, CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Barcelona, Spain
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Visualization, Project administration, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    david.martin@ibe.upf-csic.es
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9784-647X

  5. Xavier Franch-Marro

    Institute of Evolutionary Biology (IBE, CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Barcelona, Spain
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    xavier.franch@ibe.upf-csic.es
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7465-6729

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PGC2018-098427-B-I00)

  • David Martín
  • Xavier Franch-Marro

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2021-125661NB-100)

  • David Martín
  • Xavier Franch-Marro

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PGC2018-094254-B-100)

  • Jordi Casanova

Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (2017-SGR 1030)

  • David Martín
  • Xavier Franch-Marro

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2021-123392NB-I00)

  • Jordi Casanova

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

The ICTS 'NANOBIOSIS', and particularly the Custom Antibody Service (CAbS, IQAC-CSIC, CIBER-BBN), is acknowledged for the assistance and support related to the E93 antibody used in this work. We thank Josefa Cruz for technical support. This project is supported by grants PGC2018-098427-B-I00 and PID2021-125661NB-I00 to DM and XF-M and grant PGC2018-094254-B-I00 and PID2021-123392NB-I00 to JC funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by grant 2017-SGR 1030 to DM and XF-M funded by the Secretaria d’Universitats i Recerca del Departament d’Economia i Coneixement de la Generalitat de Catalunya and through BIST to JC. The research has also benefited from ERDF 'A way of making Europe to JC, DM and XF-M. SC is a recipient of a Juan de la Cierva FJC2019-041549-I contract from the MCIN.

Senior Editor

  1. Claude Desplan, New York University, United States

Reviewing Editor

  1. Vilaiwan M Fernandes, University College London, United Kingdom

Reviewer

  1. James W Truman, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, United States

Version history

  1. Received: November 2, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: November 18, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: April 27, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: April 28, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: June 1, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Chafino et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,246
    Page views
  • 261
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sílvia Chafino
  2. Panagiotis Giannios
  3. Jordi Casanova
  4. David Martín
  5. Xavier Franch-Marro
(2023)
Antagonistic role of the BTB-zinc finger transcription factors Chinmo and Broad-Complex in the juvenile/pupal transition and in growth control
eLife 12:e84648.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84648

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology

    Dynamic compartmentalization of the pro-invasive transcription factor NHR-67 reveals a role for Groucho in regulating a proliferative-invasive cellular switch in C. elegans

    Taylor N Medwig-Kinney, Brian A Kinney ... David Q Matus
    Research Article

    A growing body of evidence suggests that cell division and basement membrane invasion are mutually exclusive cellular behaviors. How cells switch between proliferative and invasive states is not well understood. Here, we investigated this dichotomy in vivo by examining two cell types in the developing Caenorhabditis elegans somatic gonad that derive from equipotent progenitors, but exhibit distinct cell behaviors: the post-mitotic, invasive anchor cell and the neighboring proliferative, non-invasive ventral uterine (VU) cells. We show that the fates of these cells post-specification are more plastic than previously appreciated and that levels of NHR-67 are important for discriminating between invasive and proliferative behavior. Transcription of NHR-67 is downregulated following post-translational degradation of its direct upstream regulator, HLH-2 (E/Daughterless) in VU cells. In the nuclei of VU cells, residual NHR-67 protein is compartmentalized into discrete punctae that are dynamic over the cell cycle and exhibit liquid-like properties. By screening for proteins that colocalize with NHR-67 punctae, we identified new regulators of uterine cell fate maintenance: homologs of the transcriptional co-repressor Groucho (UNC-37 and LSY-22), as well as the TCF/LEF homolog POP-1. We propose a model in which the association of NHR-67 with the Groucho/TCF complex suppresses the default invasive state in non-invasive cells, which complements transcriptional regulation to add robustness to the proliferative-invasive cellular switch in vivo.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Developmental Biology

    Transcription: A hub of activity

    Virginia L Pimmett, Mounia Lagha
    Insight

    Imaging experiments reveal the complex and dynamic nature of the transcriptional hubs associated with Notch signaling.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology

    Cylicins are a structural component of the sperm calyx being indispensable for male fertility in mice and human

    Simon Schneider, Andjela Kovacevic ... Hubert Schorle
    Research Article

    Cylicins are testis-specific proteins, which are exclusively expressed during spermiogenesis. In mice and humans, two Cylicins, the gonosomal X-linked Cylicin 1 (Cylc1/CYLC1) and the autosomal Cylicin 2 (Cylc2/CYLC2) genes, have been identified. Cylicins are cytoskeletal proteins with an overall positive charge due to lysine-rich repeats. While Cylicins have been localized in the acrosomal region of round spermatids, they resemble a major component of the calyx within the perinuclear theca at the posterior part of mature sperm nuclei. However, the role of Cylicins during spermiogenesis has not yet been investigated. Here, we applied CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in zygotes to establish Cylc1- and Cylc2-deficient mouse lines as a model to study the function of these proteins. Cylc1 deficiency resulted in male subfertility, whereas Cylc2-/-, Cylc1-/yCylc2+/-, and Cylc1-/yCylc2-/- males were infertile. Phenotypical characterization revealed that loss of Cylicins prevents proper calyx assembly during spermiogenesis. This results in decreased epididymal sperm counts, impaired shedding of excess cytoplasm, and severe structural malformations, ultimately resulting in impaired sperm motility. Furthermore, exome sequencing identified an infertile man with a hemizygous variant in CYLC1 and a heterozygous variant in CYLC2, displaying morphological abnormalities of the sperm including the absence of the acrosome. Thus, our study highlights the relevance and importance of Cylicins for spermiogenic remodeling and male fertility in human and mouse, and provides the basis for further studies on unraveling the complex molecular interactions between perinuclear theca proteins required during spermiogenesis.