lncRNA read-through regulates the BX-C insulator Fub-1

  1. Airat Ibragimov  Is a corresponding author
  2. Xin Yang Bing
  3. Yulii Shidlovskii
  4. Michael Levine
  5. Pavel Georgiev
  6. Paul Schedl  Is a corresponding author
  1. Princeton University, United States
  2. Institute of Gene Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation

Abstract

hough long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) represent a substantial fraction of the Pol II transcripts in multicellular animals, only a few have known functions. Here we report that the blocking activity of the Bithorax complex (BX-C) Fub-1 boundary is segmentally regulated by its own lncRNA. The Fub-1 boundary is located between the Ultrabithorax (Ubx) gene and the bxd/pbx regulatory domain, which is responsible for regulating Ubx expression in parasegment PS6/segment A1. Fub-1 consists of two hypersensitive sites, HS1 and HS2. HS1 is an insulator while HS2 functions primarily as a lncRNA promoter. To activate Ubx expression in PS6/A1 enhancers in the bxd/pbx domain must be able to bypass Fub-1 blocking activity. We show that expression of the Fub-1 lncRNAs in PS6/A1 from the HS2 promoter inactivates Fub-1 insulating activity. Inactivation is due to readthrough as the HS2 promoter must be directed towards HS1 to disrupt blocking.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE217005. The data can be accessed using the following secure token sxyxomkyjlgxvmj

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Airat Ibragimov

    Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    For correspondence
    airati@princeton.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5973-9147
  2. Xin Yang Bing

    Lewis Sigler Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    Xin Yang Bing, is affiliated with BlueRock Therapeutics. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  3. Yulii Shidlovskii

    Laboratory of Gene Expression Regulation in Development, Institute of Gene Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3643-9889
  4. Michael Levine

    Lewis Sigler Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Pavel Georgiev

    Department of the Control of Genetic Processes, Institute of Gene Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Paul Schedl

    Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    For correspondence
    pschedl@princeton.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5704-2349

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35 GM126975)

  • Paul Schedl

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM118147)

  • Michael Levine

Russian Science Foundation (20-14-00201)

  • Yulii Shidlovskii

Russian Science Foundation (19-14-00103)

  • Pavel Georgiev

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (075-15-2019-1661)

  • Pavel Georgiev

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Howard Y Chang, Stanford University, United States

Version history

  1. Received: November 5, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: November 15, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: August 9, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: August 10, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: September 12, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Ibragimov et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 844
    views
  • 95
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Airat Ibragimov
  2. Xin Yang Bing
  3. Yulii Shidlovskii
  4. Michael Levine
  5. Pavel Georgiev
  6. Paul Schedl
(2023)
lncRNA read-through regulates the BX-C insulator Fub-1
eLife 12:e84711.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84711

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84711

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Lisa Baumgartner, Jonathan J Ipsaro ... Julius Brennecke
    Research Advance

    Members of the diverse heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) family play crucial roles in heterochromatin formation and maintenance. Despite the similar affinities of their chromodomains for di- and tri-methylated histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9me2/3), different HP1 proteins exhibit distinct chromatin-binding patterns, likely due to interactions with various specificity factors. Previously, we showed that the chromatin-binding pattern of the HP1 protein Rhino, a crucial factor of the Drosophila PIWI-interacting RNA (piRNA) pathway, is largely defined by a DNA sequence-specific C2H2 zinc finger protein named Kipferl (Baumgartner et al., 2022). Here, we elucidate the molecular basis of the interaction between Rhino and its guidance factor Kipferl. Through phylogenetic analyses, structure prediction, and in vivo genetics, we identify a single amino acid change within Rhino’s chromodomain, G31D, that does not affect H3K9me2/3 binding but disrupts the interaction between Rhino and Kipferl. Flies carrying the rhinoG31D mutation phenocopy kipferl mutant flies, with Rhino redistributing from piRNA clusters to satellite repeats, causing pronounced changes in the ovarian piRNA profile of rhinoG31D flies. Thus, Rhino’s chromodomain functions as a dual-specificity module, facilitating interactions with both a histone mark and a DNA-binding protein.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Ramona Weber, Chung-Te Chang
    Research Article

    Recent findings indicate that the translation elongation rate influences mRNA stability. One of the factors that has been implicated in this link between mRNA decay and translation speed is the yeast DEAD-box helicase Dhh1p. Here, we demonstrated that the human ortholog of Dhh1p, DDX6, triggers the deadenylation-dependent decay of inefficiently translated mRNAs in human cells. DDX6 interacts with the ribosome through the Phe-Asp-Phe (FDF) motif in its RecA2 domain. Furthermore, RecA2-mediated interactions and ATPase activity are both required for DDX6 to destabilize inefficiently translated mRNAs. Using ribosome profiling and RNA sequencing, we identified two classes of endogenous mRNAs that are regulated in a DDX6-dependent manner. The identified targets are either translationally regulated or regulated at the steady-state-level and either exhibit signatures of poor overall translation or of locally reduced ribosome translocation rates. Transferring the identified sequence stretches into a reporter mRNA caused translation- and DDX6-dependent degradation of the reporter mRNA. In summary, these results identify DDX6 as a crucial regulator of mRNA translation and decay triggered by slow ribosome movement and provide insights into the mechanism by which DDX6 destabilizes inefficiently translated mRNAs.