lncRNA read-through regulates the BX-C insulator Fub-1

  1. Airat Ibragimov  Is a corresponding author
  2. Xin Yang Bing
  3. Yulii Shidlovskii
  4. Michael Levine
  5. Pavel Georgiev
  6. Paul Schedl  Is a corresponding author
  1. Princeton University, United States
  2. Institute of Gene Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation

Abstract

hough long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) represent a substantial fraction of the Pol II transcripts in multicellular animals, only a few have known functions. Here we report that the blocking activity of the Bithorax complex (BX-C) Fub-1 boundary is segmentally regulated by its own lncRNA. The Fub-1 boundary is located between the Ultrabithorax (Ubx) gene and the bxd/pbx regulatory domain, which is responsible for regulating Ubx expression in parasegment PS6/segment A1. Fub-1 consists of two hypersensitive sites, HS1 and HS2. HS1 is an insulator while HS2 functions primarily as a lncRNA promoter. To activate Ubx expression in PS6/A1 enhancers in the bxd/pbx domain must be able to bypass Fub-1 blocking activity. We show that expression of the Fub-1 lncRNAs in PS6/A1 from the HS2 promoter inactivates Fub-1 insulating activity. Inactivation is due to readthrough as the HS2 promoter must be directed towards HS1 to disrupt blocking.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE217005. The data can be accessed using the following secure token sxyxomkyjlgxvmj

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Airat Ibragimov

    Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    For correspondence
    airati@princeton.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5973-9147
  2. Xin Yang Bing

    Lewis Sigler Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    Xin Yang Bing, is affiliated with BlueRock Therapeutics. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  3. Yulii Shidlovskii

    Laboratory of Gene Expression Regulation in Development, Institute of Gene Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3643-9889
  4. Michael Levine

    Lewis Sigler Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Pavel Georgiev

    Department of the Control of Genetic Processes, Institute of Gene Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Paul Schedl

    Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    For correspondence
    pschedl@princeton.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5704-2349

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35 GM126975)

  • Paul Schedl

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM118147)

  • Michael Levine

Russian Science Foundation (20-14-00201)

  • Yulii Shidlovskii

Russian Science Foundation (19-14-00103)

  • Pavel Georgiev

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (075-15-2019-1661)

  • Pavel Georgiev

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Ibragimov et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 988
    views
  • 124
    downloads
  • 11
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Airat Ibragimov
  2. Xin Yang Bing
  3. Yulii Shidlovskii
  4. Michael Levine
  5. Pavel Georgiev
  6. Paul Schedl
(2023)
lncRNA read-through regulates the BX-C insulator Fub-1
eLife 12:e84711.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84711

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84711

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Jake VanBelzen, Bennet Sakelaris ... Jason H Brickner
    Research Article

    Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP-seq) is the most common approach to observe global binding of proteins to DNA in vivo. The occupancy of transcription factors (TFs) from ChIP-seq agrees well with an alternative method, chromatin endogenous cleavage (ChEC-seq2). However, ChIP-seq and ChEC-seq2 reveal strikingly different patterns of enrichment of yeast RNA polymerase II (RNAPII). We hypothesized that this reflects distinct populations of RNAPII, some of which are captured by ChIP-seq and some of which are captured by ChEC-seq2. RNAPII association with enhancers and promoters - predicted from biochemical studies - is detected well by ChEC-seq2 but not by ChIP-seq. Enhancer/promoter-bound RNAPII correlates with transcription levels and matches predicted occupancy based on published rates of enhancer recruitment, preinitiation assembly, initiation, elongation, and termination. The occupancy from ChEC-seq2 allowed us to develop a stochastic model for global kinetics of RNAPII transcription which captured both the ChEC-seq2 data and changes upon chemical-genetic perturbations to transcription. Finally, RNAPII ChEC-seq2 and kinetic modeling suggests that a mutation in the Gcn4 transcription factor that blocks interaction with the NPC destabilizes promoter-associated RNAPII without altering its recruitment to the enhancer.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Maruti Nandan Rai, Qing Lan ... Koon Ho Wong
    Research Article Updated

    Candida glabrata can thrive inside macrophages and tolerate high levels of azole antifungals. These innate abilities render infections by this human pathogen a clinical challenge. How C. glabrata reacts inside macrophages and what is the molecular basis of its drug tolerance are not well understood. Here, we mapped genome-wide RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) occupancy in C. glabrata to delineate its transcriptional responses during macrophage infection in high temporal resolution. RNAPII profiles revealed dynamic C. glabrata responses to macrophages with genes of specialized pathways activated chronologically at different times of infection. We identified an uncharacterized transcription factor (CgXbp1) important for the chronological macrophage response, survival in macrophages, and virulence. Genome-wide mapping of CgXbp1 direct targets further revealed its multi-faceted functions, regulating not only virulence-related genes but also genes associated with drug resistance. Finally, we showed that CgXbp1 indeed also affects fluconazole resistance. Overall, this work presents a powerful approach for examining host-pathogen interaction and uncovers a novel transcription factor important for C. glabrata’s survival in macrophages and drug tolerance.