1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
  2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

Concurrent remodelling of nucleolar 60S subunit precursors by the Rea1 ATPase and Spb4 RNA helicase

  1. Valentin Mitterer  Is a corresponding author
  2. Matthias Thoms
  3. Robert Buschauer
  4. Otto Berninghausen
  5. Ed Hurt  Is a corresponding author
  6. Roland Beckmann  Is a corresponding author
  1. Biochemistry Center, University of Heidelberg, Germany
  2. Gene Center, University of Munich, Germany
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84877
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Valentin Mitterer
  2. Matthias Thoms
  3. Robert Buschauer
  4. Otto Berninghausen
  5. Ed Hurt
  6. Roland Beckmann
(2023)
Concurrent remodelling of nucleolar 60S subunit precursors by the Rea1 ATPase and Spb4 RNA helicase
eLife 12:e84877.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84877
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Biogenesis intermediates of nucleolar ribosomal 60S precursor particles undergo a number of structural maturation steps before they transit to the nucleoplasm and are finally exported into the cytoplasm. The AAA+-ATPase Rea1 participates in the nucleolar exit by releasing the Ytm1–Erb1 heterodimer from the evolving pre-60S particle. Here, we show that the DEAD-box RNA helicase Spb4 with its interacting partner Rrp17 is further integrated into this maturation event. Spb4 binds to a specific class of late nucleolar pre-60S intermediates, whose cryo-EM structure revealed how its helicase activity facilitates melting and restructuring of 25S rRNA helices H62 and H63/H63a prior to Ytm1–Erb1 release. In vitro maturation of such Spb4-enriched pre-60S particles, incubated with purified Rea1 and its associated pentameric Rix1-complex in the presence of ATP, combined with cryo-EM analysis depicted the details of the Rea1-dependent large-scale pre-ribosomal remodeling. Our structural insights unveil how the Rea1 ATPase and Spb4 helicase remodel late nucleolar pre-60S particles by rRNA restructuring and dismantling of a network of several ribosomal assembly factors.

Editor's evaluation

This fundamental study substantially advances our understanding of the process of ribosome maturation. The authors have purified and determined the structures of several nucleolar ribosome assembly intermediates in yeast using cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). The study combines genetic, biochemical, and structural analysis to provide compelling support for the conclusions the authors wish to draw. The work will be of broad interest to cell biologists, biochemists, and structural biologists.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84877.sa0

Introduction

Eukaryotic ribosomes consist of a small (40S) and a large (60S) subunit that are comprised of four ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) and 79–80 ribosomal proteins. While the yeast 40S subunit contains the 18S rRNA and 33 ribosomal proteins, the 60S subunit contains the 5S, 5.8S, and 25S rRNA species and 46 ribosomal proteins. The two ribosomal subunits are assembled in a complex highly regulated and hierarchical biogenesis process that starts in the nucleolus by transcription of a common precursor RNA (the 35S pre-rRNA) and the co-transcriptional association of the first ribosomal proteins and assembly factors. Upon endonucleolytic cleavage within the internal RNA spacer element 1 (ITS1), the pre-40S and pre-60S subunits follow separate biogenesis routes in the nucleolus, nucleoplasm, and finally cytoplasm. For reviews on ribosome biogenesis see Baßler and Hurt, 2019; de la Cruz et al., 2015; Klinge and Woolford, 2019; Kressler et al., 2017.

The precursors of the large ribosomal subunit undergo a cascade of consecutive rRNA folding steps in which the initially flexible six intertwined 25S rRNA domains (named in the 5’ to 3’ direction as domains I to VI) get integrated into the developing 60S core. While in the earliest precursors the 27SA2 pre-rRNA is highly flexible, the proportion of stably folded rRNA domains is strongly increased in succeeding 27SB pre-rRNA containing precursor particles (Burlacu et al., 2017). In line with chemical probing data, cryo-EM structures revealed that shaping of the immature rRNA occurs in a hierarchical order, in which first the 25S rRNA domains I, II, and parts of domain VI, together with the 5.8S rRNA and internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2), adopt a folded conformation and form the solvent-exposed back side of the pre-60S particle (structural states 1/A and 2/B) (Kater et al., 2017; Sanghai et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2019b). Subsequent compaction of large parts of domains III, IV, and V results in formation of the polypeptide exit tunnel (PET) in state C to E particles. Transition of the 60S precursors to the nucleoplasm goes along with a re-positioning of the L1 stalk (helices H75-H78 of 25S rRNA domain V) allowing restructuring and incorporation of large parts of domain V and formation of the central-protuberance (CP) (state F/Nog2 particles) (Kater et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2016). As part of the CP, the 5S rRNA, which is transcribed independently from the other rRNA species and flexibly assembled at an earlier maturation stage, becomes stably integrated and structurally visible at this stage (Leidig et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2016). Upon subsequent removal of ITS2 and rotational movement of the 5S rRNA into its nearly mature orientation, the pre-60S intermediates are exported to the cytoplasm (Gasse et al., 2015; Kater et al., 2020; Matsuo et al., 2014; Schuller et al., 2018; Thoms et al., 2015; Wu et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2019a). Here, final structuring of the inter-subunit side (ISS) and the peptidyl-transferase centre (PTC) completes 60S maturation and permits entrance of the assembled subunit to the pool of actively translating ribosomes (Kargas et al., 2019; Ma et al., 2017; Malyutin et al., 2017; Zhou et al., 2019a).

The accurate and efficient rRNA maturation and ribosome assembly requires ca. 80 small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) and at least 200 non-ribosomal assembly factors. Among these assembly factors are a variety of energy consuming enzymes such as AAA+-ATPases and RNA helicases that facilitate key RNA and protein remodelling events on nascent ribosomal intermediates (Kressler et al., 2010). The activity of the dynein-related AAA+-ATPase Rea1 is required for two separate ATP-hydrolysis-dependent pre-60S maturation steps. In the earlier step, Rea1 releases assembly factor Ytm1 and its binding partner Erb1 from late nucleolar pre-60S particles (Bassler et al., 2010; Thoms et al., 2016; Wegrecki et al., 2015). In a second maturation step, which goes along with CP formation in the nucleoplasm, Rea1 dislodges assembly factor Rsa4 and thereby primes the 60S precursors for their export to the cytoplasm (Barrio-Garcia et al., 2016; Kater et al., 2020; Matsuo et al., 2014; Ulbrich et al., 2009). The interaction of Rea1 with Ytm1 and Rsa4 is established between a metal-ion-dependent adhesion site (MIDAS) at the C-terminal tip of the Rea1 tail and the ubiquitin-like (UBL) domains of its assembly factor ligands (Ahmed et al., 2019; Bassler et al., 2010; Mickolajczyk et al., 2022; Ulbrich et al., 2009). We previously revealed the architecture of Rea1 and its associated pentameric Rix1-complex, which serves as docking platform for the ATPase on nucleoplasmic pre-60S particles (Barrio-Garcia et al., 2016; Kater et al., 2020). Upon pre-60S association, a highly conserved loop motif within the Rea1 MIDAS facilitates the attachment of the C-terminal MIDAS onto the N-terminal AAA+ ring domain (Ahmed et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2018; Kater et al., 2020; Sosnowski et al., 2018). This intramolecular MIDAS docking may enable a direct force-transmission upon ATP hydrolysis from the AAA+ domain onto the MIDAS to dislodge the MIDAS-bound Rsa4 ligand. While there is no direct evidence that the Rix1-complex recruits Rea1 also to nucleolar 60S precursors, inhibition of Ytm1 release resulted in a shift of otherwise nucleoplasmic Rix1 particles to a nucleolar stage (Bassler et al., 2010). This suggests a function of the Rix1-complex for mediating Rea1 remodeling of its nucleolar substrate particles as well.

Around 20 RNA helicases involved in ribosome biogenesis have been identified so far (Granneman et al., 2006; Mitterer and Pertschy, 2022; Rodríguez-Galán et al., 2013). While it is suggested that these ATP-dependent enzymes promote crucial ribosomal restructuring steps including rRNA folding/re-arrangement or disassembly of snoRNAs, a precise molecular function was described only for very few RNA helicases. The DEAD-box helicase Spb4 is essential for cell viability and 60S assembly (de la Cruz et al., 1998; García-Gómez et al., 2011). Spb4 exhibits RNA-stimulated ATPase activity in vitro, which is abolished by a point mutation within the catalytic DEAD (Walker B) helicase motif (Brüning et al., 2018). Upon its depletion and in spb4 catalytic mutant backgrounds, processing of the 27SB pre-rRNA on pre-60S particles was blocked (Brüning et al., 2018; de la Cruz et al., 1998; García-Gómez et al., 2011). In line with this, depletion of Spb4 impaired the recruitment of the late B-factor Nog2, which is necessary for subsequent 27SB processing (Talkish et al., 2012). A low-resolution cryo-EM density and CRAC (UV-crosslinking and cDNA analysis) experiments suggested that Spb4 binds to pre-60S intermediates at a hinge region at the base of eukaryote-specific expansion segment 27 (ES27) within 25S rRNA domain IV (Brüning et al., 2018; Kater et al., 2017; Sanghai et al., 2018). However, despite the proposed pre-60S location, the function of Spb4 on these intermediates and its rRNA restructuring substrate remain unknown.

Here, we report an essential function of the RNA helicase Spb4 and its interaction partner Rrp17 for the maturation of late nucleolar pre-60S particles. Spb4 and Rrp17 bind to such intermediates directly prior to their transition to the nucleoplasm, which is mediated by the Rea1 AAA+-ATPase. Consistent with a most recently published study (Cruz et al., 2022), our cryo-EM structure of Spb4 bound to pre-60S particles suggests how the helicase facilitates restructuring of its substrate rRNA before it can later fold into its mature-like conformation. Furthermore, the association of Spb4 with 60S precursors is required to allow the Rea1-dependent release of the Ytm1–Erb1 subcomplex. By coupling an in vitro maturation assay with isolated pre-60S particles to cryo-EM analyses, we could recapitulate this major structural transition during removal and destabilization of a large set of assembly factors, which promotes the nucleolar exit of 60S precursors.

Results

Spb4 and Rrp17 are enriched on late nucleolar pre-60S particles

During the transition from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm, precursors of the 60S subunit undergo substantial changes regarding the rRNA folding status and concomitant association and dissociation of several assembly factors. Our previous cryo-EM analysis of a late nucleolar pre-60S particle (state E) purified via the dominant-lethal Ytm1 E80A mutant (this mutation impairs the Rea1-dependent release of the Ytm1–Erb1 subcomplex) revealed a low-resolution density for the DEAD-box RNA helicase Spb4 at the inter-subunit side, which was not present on earlier (states A–C) or later pre-60S maturation stages (states NE1, NE2, F) (Kater et al., 2020; Kater et al., 2017). Consistent with this observation, Spb4 was enriched on pre-60S particles isolated via Ytm1 E80A but not via wild-type Ytm1, whereas earlier nucleolar assembly factors (e.g. Noc1, Rrp5, Drs1) already dissociated at this stage (Figure 1A; Kater et al., 2017). Besides Spb4, another assembly factor, Rrp17, was accumulated on these Ytm1 E80A particles (Figure 1A), indicating that both, Spb4 and Rrp17, have a function during late steps of nucleolar pre-60S maturation.

Figure 1 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Spb4 and Rrp17 bind to late nucleolar 60S precursors.

(A) Spb4 and Rrp17 are enriched on Ytm1 E80A particles. Plasmid-borne TAP-Flag tagged wild-type YTM1 or the ytm1 E80A mutant were affinity purified and final eluates analysed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining. (B) SPB4-HA-AID and RRP17-HA-AID strains were spotted in tenfold serial dilutions on YPD plates without (YPD) or containing auxin (YPD + Auxin) and incubated for 2 d at 30°C. (C) Upper panel: Spb4 protein domain organization. Amino acids within the conserved helicase core signature motifs I (K57: ATP-binding), II (E173: ATP hydrolysis), and VI (R360: ATP-hydrolysis) that were mutated in this study are indicated. Lower panel: A SPB4 (spb4Δ) shuffle strain was transformed with plasmids harbouring wild-type SPB4 or indicated spb4 mutant alleles. Transformants were spotted in tenfold serial dilutions on SDC-Leu or 5-FOA containing plates (SDC + FOA) and growth was monitored after incubation at 30°C for the indicated days. (D) Spb4-FTpA (left panel) and Rrp17-FTpA (right panel) affinity purifications enrich late nucleolar pre-60S particles. Pre-60S particles were isolated via chromosomally encoded Spb4- or Rrp17-FTpA. Final eluates were analysed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining and indicated protein bands identified by mass spectrometry. Bands that show an increased or decreased relative intensity in the Rrp17 eluate compared to the Spb4 sample are depicted in red and blue, respectively. Note that the nucleoplasmic factors Nog2 and Rsa4 were detectable only in the Rrp17 sample. Bait proteins are marked with an asterisk.

Figure 1—source data 1

Unedited and uncropped Coomassie-stained gels shown in Figure 1.

Dashed boxes in the PDF indicate the respective areas shown in the figure.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/84877/elife-84877-fig1-data1-v3.zip

As previous studies suggested a role of the SPB4 and RRP17 genes in ribosome biogenesis (Brüning et al., 2018; de la Cruz et al., 1998; García-Gómez et al., 2011; Oeffinger et al., 2009), we tested their essential functions by depletion of the Spb4-HA-AID and Rrp17-HA-AID proteins via an auxin-inducible degron (AID) approach, which as anticipated yielded non-viable yeast cells (Figure 1B, Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). Moreover, we analysed spb4 point mutations of the catalytic helicase core domains (K57R: ATP-binding motif, E173A: ATP-hydrolysis motif, R360A: ATP-hydrolysis motif), and Spb4 C-terminal truncation mutants, which turned out to be lethal or exhibited a slow-growth phenotype (Figure 1C, Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). Subsequent affinity purifications of the helicase mutants and the C-terminal Spb4 truncations, all tagged with Flag-TEV-protein A (FTpA), showed that they still co-purify pre-ribosomal particles, however, somewhat less efficiently (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C and D). This indicates an essential pre-60S targeting function of the C-terminal domain (CTD), which was recently described also for DDX55, the human homologue of Spb4 (Choudhury et al., 2021), whereas another recent study on yeast Spb4 suggested that not the entire CTD is strictly required for pre-60S assembly (Cruz et al., 2022). Taken together, our results suggest that the Spb4 function on nascent 60S pre-ribosomes depends on both the catalytic and C-terminal domain.

In contrast to the tested spb4 mutants, affinity purifications via wild-type Spb4 co-enriched a pattern of assembly factors highly similar to Ytm1 E80A particles (state E) and contained large amounts of Rrp17 (Figure 1D, left panel). Vice versa, Rrp17-FTpA affinity purifications co-enriched pre-60S particles with a comparable assembly factor composition and Spb4 but in contrast to Spb4 purifications also a few downstream nucleoplasmic assembly factors like Nog2, Rsa4, and the ITS2 foot-factor Nop53 (Figure 1D, right panel). Based on these affinity purifications, we conclude that both, Spb4 and Rrp17, join the maturation pathway around nucleolar state E. While Spb4 subsequently dissociates during or shortly after release of Ytm1–Erb1 by Rea1, Rrp17 may remain associated on downstream intermediates upon Nop53 association (Nop53 binds pre-60S particles at state NE1 upon Ytm1–Erb1 removal).

Depletion of Spb4 and Rrp17 arrests pre-60S maturation at a stage directly before nucleolar exit

To elucidate which particular pre-60S maturation step(s) require Spb4 and Rrp17, we assessed the impact of their cellular depletion on the assembly factor composition of purified pre-60S intermediates. Therefore, we generated chromosomal AID fusions of SPB4 or RRP17 in strains expressing FTpA-tagged Nop7, Nug1, or Arx1 and isolated these assembly factors from cells in presence of Spb4-HA-AID and Rrp17-HA-AID (-auxin) or after their auxin-induced degradation (+auxin) (Figure 2). In the absence of Spb4 or Rrp17, pre-60S maturation was effectively arrested at a late nucleolar stage, as apparent by the accumulation of assembly factors Ytm1–Erb1, Spb1, and Has1 on Nug1- and Nop7-derived particles, whereas the recruitment of Nop53 and downstream nucleoplasmic assembly factors such as Nog2 and Bud20 to these stalled maturation intermediates was impaired (Figure 2B and C). This suggests an important function of both Spb4 and Rrp17 for pre-60S maturation before Ytm1–Erb1 dissociation and transition of pre-60S particles to the nucleoplasm. Consistently, the export factor Arx1 that joins at a nucleoplasmic stage failed to efficiently co-purify pre-ribosomes upon Spb4 or Rrp17 depletion and was instead present mainly in a free form or associated with mature ribosomes or non-ribosomal factors (e.g. importins) (Figure 2D). Notably, while the association of Spb4 with Nug1- and Nop7-derived particles was a prerequisite for recruitment of Rrp17, the presence of Rrp17 was apparently not strictly required for Spb4-recruitment to these 60S precursors (Figure 2B, right panel; note that in Figure 2C Spb4 is co-migrating with the Nug1-Flag bait protein as revealed by mass spectrometry analyses).

Figure 2
Download asset Open asset
Spb4 and Rrp17 depletion arrests pre-60S maturation at a late nucleolar stage.

(A) Colour-coded bait proteins selected for affinity purifications are associated with distinct maturation intermediates along the 60S biogenesis pathway in the nucleolus, nucleoplasm, and cytoplasm: Nop7 (violet), Nug1 (green), and Arx1 (orange). The proposed assembly/disassembly stage of Spb4 and Rrp17 is indicated. (B–D) Nop7-FTpA, Nug1-FTpA, and Arx1-FTpA were affinity purified from cells in the presence of Spb4-HA-AID or Rrp17-HA-AID (-Auxin) or upon their auxin-induced proteasomal degradation (+Auxin). Final eluates were analysed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining (left panels) or western blotting using indicated antibodies (right panels). Depicted Coomassie-stained protein bands were identified by mass spectrometry. Bait proteins are marked with an asterisk. Protein bands with increased or decreased intensity in the depleted samples are indicated in red and blue, respectively. For a better visualization, the area of the Coomassie-stained gels of the Nop7 and Nug1 eluates to which Rrp17 migrates is enlarged (B and C, left panels; note that the additional protein band appearing in the Spb4-HA-AID-depleted samples was identified as ribosomal protein P0).

Figure 2—source data 1

Unedited and uncropped Coomassie-stained gels and western blots shown in Figure 2B.

Dashed boxes in the PDF indicate the respective areas shown in the figure.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/84877/elife-84877-fig2-data1-v3.zip
Figure 2—source data 2

Unedited and uncropped Coomassie-stained gels and western blots shown in Figure 2C.

Dashed boxes in the PDF indicate the respective areas shown in the figure.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/84877/elife-84877-fig2-data2-v3.zip
Figure 2—source data 3

Unedited and uncropped Coomassie-stained gels and western blots shown in Figure 2D.

Dashed boxes in the PDF indicate the respective areas shown in the figure.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/84877/elife-84877-fig2-data3-v3.zip

Taken together, our data revealed an essential function of Spb4 and Rrp17 during final steps of nucleolar pre-60S maturation directly prior to release of the Erb1–Ytm1 subcomplex and subsequent assembly of Nop53. Thereby, Spb4 may associate with 60S precursors shortly before Rrp17 and help to mediate its incorporation.

Cryo-EM structure of the Spb4 particle

To obtain insight into the molecular function of Spb4, we sought to analyse the structure of the helicase bound to its pre-ribosomal 60S substrate particle and performed single-particle cryo-EM analysis with affinity-purified Spb4-FTpA intermediates. The major class of particles (40.85% of particles after 2D classification), which closely resembles the structural state E (Kater et al., 2017), was resolved at an overall resolution of 2.7 Å (Figure 3A and B, Figure 3—figure supplement 1A–C, and Figure 3—figure supplement 2A–E), whereas a minor class corresponded to state D at an overall resolution of 3.0 Å (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A–C and Figure 3—figure supplement 2F–I). The latter class contains in addition the Nsa1 module (consisting of assembly factors Nsa1, Rpf1, Mak16, and Rrp1) at the solvent-exposed pre-60S side but is otherwise identical to the better resolved state E (Figure 3—figure supplement 3A). The higher resolution of the state E compared to our previous study (Kater et al., 2017) allowed us to identify and build molecular models of assembly factors Spb4, Rrp17, Noc2, and Loc1, as well to resolve additional parts of Noc3, Spb1, Nsa3, and of the ITS2 RNA (Figure 3A and B, Figure 3—figure supplement 2A–E). At the inter-subunit side Spb4 is in contact with Rrp17 and located on top of the immature rRNA helices H62 and H63 in direct vicinity to the Ytm1–Erb1 complex (Figure 3A, B, H and I). The intertwined Loc1 is located at the solvent-exposed pre-60S side where it engages in multiple protein interactions with assembly factors Noc3, Spb1, Nip7, Erb1, Ebp2, Brx1, and ribosomal protein Rpl15 (eL15) (Figure 3A and B, Figure 3—figure supplement 3B). Next to Loc1, Noc3 interacts with the C-terminal part of its heat-repeat domain with its binding partner Noc2 (Figure 3B, Figure 3—figure supplement 3C). While the middle part of Noc2 (aa 86–176) is not resolved, the C-terminal Noc2 heat-repeat domain and the N-terminal part of the protein are visible, and both contribute to establish the interaction with Noc3. Besides its interaction with Noc3, Noc2 is anchored to the particle by its elongated N-terminus that protrudes deeply into the 60S core. There, the Noc2 N-terminus contacts the immature H35 rRNA, which likely requires Noc2 dissociation to adopt its mature conformation (Figure 3—figure supplement 3C). We were also able to resolve additional parts of the ITS2 spacer RNA (nucleotides 60–65 and 213–226) and the C-terminus of Nsa3 (aa 324–353) at the prominent pre-60S ‘foot’ structure (Figure 3—figure supplement 3D). This unveiled internal base-pairing of ITS2 bases 62–65 with 213–216, which is in line with a proposed ‘ring-pin’ model for the ITS2 structure based on chemical probing data (Burlacu et al., 2017). Furthermore, it revealed how the ITS2 RNA and Nsa3 are twined around and enclose assembly factor Nop15 (Figure 3—figure supplement 3D), which therefore can presumably dissociate only upon ITS2 processing and subsequent release of the foot factors (Gasse et al., 2015; Schuller et al., 2018).

Figure 3 with 6 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Cryo-EM structure of the nucleolar state E pre-60S subunit.

(A, B) Cryo-EM density and model in two orientations, ribosome biogenesis factors relevant to the study are coloured and labelled. Ribosomal proteins and rRNA are shown in grey and additional biogenesis factors in beige. (C) Cryo-EM model-based secondary structure of H62, H63, and H63a of the rRNA in the nucleolar state E, the nucleoplasmic Nog2 particle (PDB-3jct) and mature ribosomes (PDB-6tb3) as comparison. Nucleotides interacting with Spb4 and the intercalating Trp536 of Spb4 are indicated. (D–M) Magnified regions focussing on Spb1, Spb4, and Rrp17. (D) The Spb1-MTD interacting with the N-terminus of Rrp17. (E, F) Spb1-MTD interacting with the A loop H92. The positioned Gm2922 and S-adenosyl homocysteine (SAH) are labelled and the segmented densities for H92 and SAH are shown. (F) The N-terminus (highlighted in red) of the Spb1-MTD clamps around H92 and helps positioning G2922. (G) Interaction of the Rrp17 C-terminus with H64 and the Spb1-MTD. (H) Ytm1 and Erb1 in contact with H63 and ES27. Insertions of Ytm1 (between ß16-ß17) and Erb1 (between ß8-ß9) are coloured in light blue and light green, respectively. The segmented density for ES27 and H63 is shown. (I) Overview of Spb4 bound to the state E pre-60S subunit. The RecA domains (RecA1, RecA2) and the C-terminal domain (CTD) are coloured and labelled. (J–L) Interaction of Spb4 with Rrp17 (J) and the immature H62/H63/H63a rRNA (K, L). (M) The Spb4 helicase core in complex with ADP. Residues mutated in this study are labelled and the segmented density for ADP is shown.

The α-helical Rrp17 connects Spb4 and the methyltransferase Spb1

While the methyltransferase Spb1 was already visualized in previous cryo-EM structures (Kater et al., 2020; Kater et al., 2017), we were able to model additional parts (between aa 347–570) of the so far unresolved widely meandering central region of the protein revealing interactions with Noc3, Rpl25 (uL23), Rpl30 (eL30), and Rpl34 (eL34) (Figure 3A and B, Figure 3—figure supplement 4A). Notably, we identified a ligand within the binding pocket of Spb1’s methyltransferase domain (MTD), which is most probably S-adenosyl homocysteine (SAH) (Figure 3E, Figure 3—figure supplement 4B), suggesting that methylation of its 2'-O-ribose target in nucleotide G2922 of the A-site loop (Lapeyre and Purushothaman, 2004) has occurred at this stage. The G2922 methylation was most recently shown to be monitored by the GTPase Nog2 establishing a crucial checkpoint for pre-60S maturation (Yelland et al., 2023). To facilitate this modification, the very N-terminal part of Spb1 (aa 4–27) may play an important role for target recognition as it clamps 25S rRNA H92 that harbours nucleotide G2922 and thereby suitably positions it for methylation (Figure 3E and F). In agreement with 2'-O-ribose methylation of G2922 at the analysed stage, we observed Gm2922 in the corresponding RNA density as well as adjacent Um2921 (Figure 3E, Figure 3—figure supplement 4B), which is in a redundant function methylated by Spb1 or the snR52 C/D box snoRNP at an earlier pre-60S biogenesis step (Bonnerot et al., 2003; Lapeyre and Purushothaman, 2004).

The α-helical Rrp17 is present at the inter-subunit side clamped between the MTD of Spb1 and the helicase core of Spb4 (Figure 3A and B, Figure 3—figure supplement 5A). While the essential unstructured Rrp17 N-terminus is meandering across the MTD of Spb1 (Figure 3D), a more central part of the protein (aa 145–159) is reaching towards Spb4 forming an anti-parallel β-sheet with the N-terminal RecA-like domain of the helicase (Figure 3I and J, Figure 3—figure supplement 5A). Prompted by this β-sheet augmentation, we analysed the growth of yeast cells upon mutation of the corresponding Rrp17 amino acids (154–160). As observed for N-terminal (Spb1 interaction) but not C-terminal Rrp17 truncation mutants, disruption of the β-sheet augmentation in rrp17 154–160>A and 154–160>R mutant cells yielded slow-growth phenotypes, revealing the importance of this Rrp17–Spb4 contact (Figure 3—figure supplement 5B). Moreover, a yeast two-hybrid interaction between Spb4 and Rrp17 was observed, mediated by the central part of Rrp17 (aa 106–177) that includes amino acids 154–160 (Figure 3—figure supplement 5C). The C-terminal part of Rrp17 (aa 209–235) is reaching back and contacts again the Spb1 MTD in proximity of its N-terminus, as well as 25S rRNA H64 (Figure 3G).

Spb4-containing pre-60S intermediates up- and downstream of state E

In the major class of the obtained state E-like Spb4 particles, Rrp17 and Spb1 including its N-terminal MTD were already incorporated as described above. In addition, the Spb4 purifications contained a mixture of distinct NE1-like states downstream of Ytm1–Erb1 removal (Kater et al., 2020) as well as state E-like particles with only weak densities for the L1 stalk, Rrp17, and the Spb1 MTD, potentially representing intermediates upstream of state E (Figure 3—figure supplement 1C). Moreover, analysis of another independent dataset of purified Spb4 particles, which underwent an only partially efficient maturation reaction, revealed an additional E-like state (resolved at 3.1 Å) lacking the corresponding Rrp17 and Spb1 MTD densities but show stable incorporation of the L1 stalk (Figure 3—figure supplement 1D–F, Figure 3—figure supplement 2J–M, Figure 3—figure supplement 6). We conclude that this state may indeed represent a novel maturation intermediate directly preceding state E. Taken together, our cryo-EM analyses suggest that Spb4 is assembled around state D/E shortly prior to final Spb1 MTD and Rrp17 incorporation, which agrees with the biochemical protein data of purified pre-60S particles upon Spb4 and Rrp17 depletion (Figure 2).

Spb4 accommodates ADP and promotes H62/H63/H63a restructuring

Our cryo-EM structure gave several insights into the molecular interactions of the Spb4 catalytic and C-terminal domains on the pre-60S particle (Figure 3A–C , and H–L). Most importantly, we observe a single-stranded rRNA (nucleotides U1942 to A1945 of 25S rRNA H63) within the helicase core active site (Figure 3K, Figure 3—figure supplement 4C). The accommodation of the rRNA substrate between the two RecA-like domains induces bending and strand separation of the rRNA around the base of ES27, resulting in an alternate base-pairing of helices H62/H63/H63a compared to nucleoplasmic maturation intermediates and mature 60S subunits (Figure 3C and K). This may explain why the rRNA area at the base of 25S domain IV initially appears to form stable duplexes, while it becomes more flexible and accessible for chemical modification in presence of Spb4, suggesting that the helicase disrupts this region upon its association (Brüning et al., 2018; Burlacu et al., 2017). In addition to the catalytic domain, Spb4’s essential CTD appears significantly involved in inducing substrate RNA strand disruption and establishing this alternate conformation. In the obtained substrate-bound state, the first half of the CTD (aa 406–499) is tightly docked onto the C-terminal RecA-like domain (RecA2) and binds H62/H63 nucleotides A1936 to C1941, thereby maintaining separation of the rRNA strands (Figure 3C, K and L, Figure 3—figure supplement 4C). Furthermore, a conserved tryptophan (W536) within the flexible C-terminal tail of the CTD (aa 500–606) intercalates between nucleotides of the immature H62/H63/H63a rRNA, which later adopts its mature-like fold in nucleoplasmic pre-60S particles (Figure 3C and L).

Two main conformations for the catalytic RNA helicase core domains have been described, which depend on the nucleotide and substrate binding state. Cooperative ATP and RNA substrate binding bring the two RecA domains in a closed conformation, while subsequent ATP hydrolysis usually leads to substrate release and re-opening of the RecA domains (Andersen et al., 2006; Bono et al., 2006; Mallam et al., 2012; Sengoku et al., 2006; Theissen et al., 2008). Examination of the catalytic Spb4 core in our structure revealed that, while the two RecA domains are in a clear closed conformation and tightly bound to the substrate RNA, the helicase surprisingly accommodates in its binding pocket a nucleotide which we could unambiguously identify as ADP (Figure 3M, Figure 3—figure supplement 4D and E). Thus, Spb4 has already hydrolysed ATP at a previous step but remains associated with pre-ribosomes in a post-catalytic and still ADP-bound closed state and preserves its re-arranged rRNA substrate in the observed immature alternate conformation as also observed in a recent structure (Cruz et al., 2022). This unusual behaviour can be explained by the requirement of ATP binding and hydrolysis to provide the energy for binding and local strand melting of the rRNA which is then followed by a subsequent stabilization of this state through the observed interactions of Sbp4 with several assembly factors such as Rrp17. As suggested by Cruz et al., 2022, it would also allow for a concerted release of Spb4 together with Ytm1 and other factors upon Rea1 activity, thereby facilitating the timely re-annealing of the H62-H63 rRNA module in the mature conformation as observed in the subsequent NE states. Thus, the interaction and activity of Sbp4 appears to set the stage for the correct formation of the H61-H62-H63-H64 rRNA region as an important prerequisite for the further maturation of rRNA domain IV.

Rea1-dependent nucleolar pre-60S maturation can be induced on isolated Spb4 particles in vitro

Next, we wanted to analyse in further detail how the Rea1 ATPase extracts Ytm1–Erb1 from nucleolar pre-60S particles. Therefore, we aimed to induce Rea1-dependent maturation of isolated TAP-Ytm1 pre-60S intermediates in vitro. We incubated Ytm1-derived particles with affinity purified Rea1, the pentameric Rix-complex (i.e. Rix12–Ipi32–Ipi1; this complex is suggested to guide Rea1 to its pre-ribosomal substrates), and ATP. However, upon subsequent re-isolation of pre-60S particles via Rpl3-Flag, the Ytm1–Erb1 complex remained fully associated with the pre-ribosomes (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A). Strikingly, performing this maturation assay with Spb4-purified pre-60S particles exhibited an efficient release of the Ytm1–Erb1 complex and, remarkably, the DEAD-box helicase Has1 (Figure 4A, lane 8). The release of these assembly factors was more efficient in presence of the Rix1-complex, however, the addition of Rea1 and ATP was in principle sufficient to perform the restructuring step, at least in this in vitro setup with excess of purified Rea1 (Figure 4A, lane 7). The in vitro maturation also occurred when the slow growing catalytic spb4 R360A mutant was used (Figure 1C, Figure 4—figure supplement 1B and D), which indicates that ATP-hydrolysis by Spb4 is not required for this maturation step. However, since in vitro maturation was inducible on Spb4- but not on Ytm1-derived pre-60S particles that co-purify only small amounts of the helicase Spb4 (Figure 1A), we conclude that pre-60S recruitment of Spb4 and potentially also Rrp17 is a prerequisite for this remodelling step. Indeed, also incubation of Rrp17 particles with Rea1, Rix1-complex, and ATP resulted in limited but clearly detectable release of the sub-stoichiometrically associated Ytm1–Erb1 complex (Figure 4—figure supplement 1C).

Figure 4 with 6 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Rea1-dependent remodelling induced on isolated Spb4 particles in vitro.

(A) Rea1 releases the Ytm1–Erb1 subcomplex together with RNA helicase Has1 from pre-60S particles. TEV-eluates of pre-60S particles isolated via Spb4-FTpA were as indicated incubated with purified Rea1, Rix1-complex (Rix12–Ipi32–Ipi1) and/or 3 mM ATP for 45 min at room temperature. Still bound material was re-isolated via Spb4-Flag by incubation with anti-Flag agarose beads and eluted with Flag peptide. Final eluates were analysed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining (upper panel) or western blotting using the indicated antibodies (lower panel). The Spb4-Flag bait protein is marked with an asterisk and the released assembly factors Ytm1, Erb1, and Has1 are indicated in blue (B) Single-particle cryo-EM analyses of Spb4 control and in vitro matured pre-60S samples. Micrographs of the untreated Spb4 control and the in vitro release samples (corresponding to lanes 1 and 8 in (A), respectively) were combined for data processing. After reference free particle picking and 2D classification, the combined dataset was processed and six final classes are shown (maps are 3 x binned and coloured according to the colour scheme in Figure 3). The diagrams indicate the percentage of particles from the Spb4 and in vitro release dataset corresponding to the individual cryo-EM reconstruction. Combined particle numbers of each class as well as the particle numbers of the individual datasets (Spb4 control and in vitro release) are shown underneath. (C) Cryo-EM map (upper panels) and model (lower panel) of the main release state. Spb1, Rrp17 and the foot factors are coloured and labelled and additional biogenesis factors are highlighted in beige. (D) Overview and magnified regions of the release state cryo-EM volume with ribosomal proteins and rRNA coloured in grey and biogenesis factors and ITS2 RNA coloured in beige. Superposition of transparent molecular models from the preceding state E indicating factors and rRNA which are destabilised/released in the release state class. (E) Model summarising the results of this study. Spb4 is assembled at a late nucleolar stage and remains attached in a helicase-core closed conformation upon ATP hydrolysis. Rrp17 is incorporated at state E, at which also the Spb1-MTD gets positioned for methylation of G2922. Rea1-dependent release of Ytm1–Erb1 facilitates large-scale remodelling of the particle and transition to the NE1-like release state.

Figure 4—source data 1

Unedited and uncropped Coomassie-stained gels and western blots shown in Figure 4A.

Dashed boxes in the PDF indicate the respective areas shown in the figure.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/84877/elife-84877-fig4-data1-v3.zip

Ytm1–Erb1 release promotes the dissociation of the RNA helicase Has1

While Rea1’s direct substrate Ytm1 is recruited to the pre-60S subunit via tight interactions with the C-terminal β-propeller domain of Erb1 near the bottom of the foot-structure (Kater et al., 2017; Thoms et al., 2016; Wegrecki et al., 2015), the RNA helicase Has1 is bound at a distant site over H16 at the top of the foot and is contacted by the meandering unstructured Erb1 N-terminal tail (Figure 4—figure supplement 2A; Kater et al., 2017; Zhou et al., 2019b). The nucleotide binding pocket of Has1 was found empty in our and a previously published pre-60S cryo-EM structure (Zhou et al., 2019b). To address whether upon addition of ATP the catalytic activity of Has1 might be activated during the observed pre-60S release, we performed the in vitro maturation assay with Spb4 particles derived from HAS1-HA-AID-depleted cells in presence of a catalytically inactive, non-viable has1 K92A mutant impaired in nucleotide-binding (Figure 4—figure supplements 1D and 2B, left panel; Rocak et al., 2005). Upon incubation with Rea1, the Rix1-complex, and ATP, wild-type and mutant Has1 proteins were released with similar efficiency together with the Ytm1–Erb1 complex, demonstrating that the removal of all three factors occurs independently from Has1’s catalytic activity (Figure 4—figure supplement 2B, left panel; compare lanes 4 and 8). Furthermore, the Ytm1–Erb1 release could be induced also from particles in absence of any Has1 protein (Figure 4—figure supplement 2B, right panel; lane 12). Thus, the Rea1-dependent pre-60S release of the Ytm1–Erb1 complex occurs before and independently of Has1, and in turn results in displacement of the helicase, which is potentially pulled off by its interaction with the intertwined Erb1 tail.

Cryo-EM analysis of in vitro matured Spb4-derived pre-60S ribosomal particles

To follow the conformational re-arrangements induced by Rea1/Rix1-complex on Spb4-derived pre-60S particles, we analysed the in vitro matured particles by single-particle cryo-EM. Initial classification of the untreated Spb4 sample, the in vitro control sample (Spb4 particles, Rea1/Rix1-complex, no ATP), and the in vitro release sample (Spb4 particles, Rea1/Rix1-complex, plus ATP) indicated a significant formation of in vitro matured pre-60S particles (44.1% of all particles), resembling structural state NE1 particles (Kater et al., 2020; Figure 4—figure supplement 3). In contrast, only 7.4 and 7.0% of such NE1-like particles, respectively, were seen in the untreated Spb4 and Spb4 in vitro control samples. To better compare the ratios and classes within the untreated Spb4 control and the in vitro release samples, and to avoid any sorting bias of the individual datasets, we decided to join the micrographs of both samples and perform uniform data processing (Figure 4—figure supplements 4 and 5). After extensive sorting, we identified six major classes, three state E-like states containing Ytm1–Erb1 and three released states similar to the described NE1 state (Figure 4B, Figure 4—figure supplements 4–6). The Ytm1–Erb1-containing state E-like states were mainly present in the untreated Spb4-FTpA sample (53.36%; only 10.31% in the in vitro release sample), whereas the release states strongly increased in the case of the in vitro release sample (32.06%; only 3.77% in the Spb4 control sample). We conclude that Rea1/Rix1-complex/ATP-induced remodelling of Spb4 particles in vitro resulted in maturation from E-like to distinct NE1-like states. All three release states have strong resemblance to the previously described NE1 state (obtained from Nop53 affinity purifications) but lack the foot-factor Nop53. However, we also find a minor particle class containing Nop53, which indicates that the attachment of Spb4 and Nop53 to pre-60S intermediates might not be strictly mutually exclusive (Figure 4—figure supplement 4).

Notably, all obtained release state particles still contain Rrp17 bound to the Spb1 MTD (Figure 4B and C), which is in line with Rrp17-FTpA purifications suggesting that the protein is still present on intermediates downstream of Spb4 (Figure 1D). In contrast, the Ytm1–Erb1 complex, the helicase Has1 and also Spb4 were no longer visible in the in vitro released states. Since Spb4 was our bait for specimen purification, it appears that Spb4 remained attached to the in vitro matured pre-60S particles in a flexible way and hence was not detectible by cryo-EM. Indeed, one of the released states showed a fuzzy density in the area where the Spb4 helicase core is located in the preceding state E, and rigid body fitting of the Spb4 helicase core clearly suggests that the poorly resolved density corresponds to Spb4 (Figure 4—figure supplement 6B). Moreover, the densities for several other assembly factors such as Loc1, Brx1, Ebp2, Noc2–Noc3, Nip7, Nop2 at the inter-subunit side, and Nop16 at the solvent-exposed side were not visible in the released NE1-like particles, revealing large-scale remodelling around the area that in state E is accessed and connected by the long N-terminal Erb1 tail (Figure 4C and D). Thus, Erb1 removal could result in destabilization of these factors, which may become invisible either by complete removal or flexible attachment to the in vitro matured pre-60S particles.

Discussion

In this study, we provided functional insights into key restructuring events occurring on late nucleolar 60S subunit precursors preceding their transition to the nucleoplasmic compartment (Figure 4E). By combining biochemical and structural cryo-EM analyses, we unveiled how induction of the ATP-dependent release of the Ytm1–Erb1 heterodimer by the AAA+-ATPase Rea1 results in large-scale remodelling of pre-60S particles isolated via the RNA helicase Spb4. Such in vitro matured particles, from which a network of assembly factors appeared dismantled, with subtle variations, resembled structural state NE1, while largely lacking assembly factor Nop53. NE1 is the earliest state obtained upon purification of native pre-60S particles isolated via Nop53, which can only join upon release of Erb1 due to overlapping binding sites at the pre-60S foot structure (Kater et al., 2020). While our biochemical data show that the removal of RNA helicase Has1 occurs together with Ytm1–Erb1, they do not suggest the complete release of further assembly factors coupled to this step. In contrast, our single-particle cryo-EM analyses clearly revealed a strong enrichment of NE1-like particle classes in the in vitro release sample, which implicates the synchronized disassembly or at least destabilization of numerous additional assembly factors. The initial release of Ytm1–Erb1 and Has1 may therefore result in pre-rRNA re-arrangement and assembly factor destabilization, which would in consequence be too flexible to be resolved by cryo-EM or become unstably attached and potentially dissociate during cryo-EM sample preparation. Indeed, this is plausible considering the intertwined nature of the Erb1 N-terminus, which, by forming various rRNA and protein contacts, may until its release stabilize nucleolar pre-60S particles. However, it remains open whether in vivo further factors and intermediary maturation steps are required to facilitate assembly factor disassembly and formation of NE1 particles upon Ytm1–Erb1 and Has1 release.

The ATP-binding pocket of Has1 was found empty in our and also a previous pre-60S cryo-EM structure (Zhou et al., 2019b). As furthermore a Has1 Walker A mutant protein was efficiently released from the particle in our maturation assay, we conclude that Has1 dissociates in an ATP-independent manner from 60S precursors. This is in agreement with previous studies suggesting that the Has1 function on 90S pre-ribosomes requires its catalytic activity (Gnanasundram et al., 2019; Liang and Fournier, 2006), while the role of Has1 in pre-60S maturation could be ATP-independent and may depend only on its physical presence (Gnanasundram et al., 2019). Alternatively, since Has1 binds already to very early nucleolar pre-60S maturation intermediates, its catalytic activity may be required during its initial pre-60S recruitment. On such early nucleolar precursors, Has1 was implicated to play a role for contact formation between the 25S 5’ end and the 5.8S rRNA (Dembowski et al., 2013).

Our previous cryo-EM structures of nucleoplasmic pre-60S particles revealed how the pentameric Rix1-complex recruits the AAA+-ATPase Rea1 to these intermediates before nuclear export (Barrio-Garcia et al., 2016; Kater et al., 2020). The Rix1-complex is thereby essential to accurately position Rea1 for interaction and the subsequent release of its direct substrate Rsa4. Previous results (Bassler et al., 2010) and the increased efficiency in Ytm1–Erb1 release contributed by the Rix1-complex in our in vitro maturation assays suggest that the Rix1-complex recruits Rea1 to its earlier pre-60S substrate as well. Nevertheless, since structural insights into the more transient interaction of Rea1 with these nucleolar 60S precursors are missing, it remains unclear how the ATPase extracts Ytm1–Erb1 and how the Rix1-complex mediates this remodelling step.

The DEAD-box helicase Spb4 is one of around 20 RNA helicases involved in ribosome biogenesis that have been identified so far (Mitterer and Pertschy, 2022). While the approximate ribosomal maturation stages at which these RNA helicases are required have been determined, their molecular functions and precise substrates in most cases remain elusive. In addition, most RNA helicases could not be resolved on the so far existing cryo-EM structures of ribosomal precursors, likely due to high flexibility, unstable association or fast dissociation. Two exceptions in which ribosome-bound helicase structures could be determined are the DEAH helicase Dhr1 and the Ski2-like helicase Mtr4, which unwind the U3 snoRNA and RNA spacer substrates, respectively (Cheng et al., 2020; Du et al., 2020; Lau et al., 2021; Schuller et al., 2018; Singh et al., 2021). In contrast to such processive helicases, DEAD-box helicases are proposed to mediate RNA folding by non-processive local strand melting and annealing. In agreement with a most recently published work (Cruz et al., 2022), our cryo-EM structure of substrate-bound Spb4 suggests how such RNA strand displacement and re-arrangement by a DEAD-box helicase attached to its pre-ribosomal substrate is orchestrated. The existing general model on the function of DEAD-box helicases suggests that substrate RNA and ATP-binding together induce the closed active conformation of the catalytic RecA domains, whereas ATP-hydrolysis in the active site instantly triggers a re-opening of the catalytic domains going along with the release of the restructured RNA substrate.(Andersen et al., 2006; Bono et al., 2006; Mallam et al., 2012; Sengoku et al., 2006). Intriguingly, in contrast to this proposed mechanism, we found ADP instead of ATP in the nucleotide binding pocket of substrate RNA-bound Spb4 with its catalytic RecA domains in a closed conformation. Thus, while Spb4 likely has hydrolysed ATP at a previous stage, ATP-hydrolysis did not facilitate re-opening of the RecA-like domains and the helicase remained bound to ADP and its H62/H63 restructuring target. A reason for the unexpected Spb4 conformation might be the interactions of the first RecA domain with Rrp17, as well as the tight interaction of the CTD with the rRNA, which could potentially lock the rigid Spb4 core in its closed state. We therefore assume that current models on the function of DEAD-box helicases need to be extended since on complex substrates such as pre-ribosomes several additional factors might influence the state of the catalytic domains. In line with this, the DEAD-box helicase Dbp7 was also suggested to rely on an extensive interaction network for its function in rRNA folding (Aquino et al., 2021; Jaafar et al., 2021) and specific DEAD-box cofactors were shown to modulate the kinetics of the helicase core conformational cycle (Harms et al., 2014). Upon Spb4 dissociation, the H62/H63/H63a rRNA is then adopting a new stably folded and mature-like state as seen in cryo-EM structures of downstream pre-60S intermediates (Kater et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2016). What eventually triggers substrate release and pre-60S dissociation of Spb4 remains, however, unclear and open for future studies. As we could not recapitulate the H62/H63/H63a folding to a more mature state in our in vitro assays, the release or association of further assembly factors and ribosomal proteins may be required to facilitate this transition. While our manuscript was in revision, another study providing a highly similar cryo-EM structure of pre-60S bound Spb4 was published (Cruz et al., 2022). The authors report similar results on the function of Spb4 and its rRNA restructuring target and observe Spb4 in a post-catalytic state. However, they observed that the ATP-binding pocket of Spb4 is empty, whereas we clearly identified ADP in the active site. This difference may be a result of slightly different preparation conditions and indicates that after ATP hydrolysis the remaining ADP binds with low affinity.

Two recent studies reported that the human Spb4 homolog DDX55 is strongly upregulated in various lung cancers and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tissues promoting HCC cell proliferation and migration (Cui et al., 2021; Yu et al., 2022). Thus, the obtained insights into the Spb4 function for ribosome biogenesis could be of relevance for medical studies and treatment of such cancer types. Furthermore, our study demonstrated the great potential of structural cryo-EM analyses of in vitro matured pre-ribosomal intermediates, which will be a promising approach to unveil further restructuring and maturation events on evolving ribosomal precursors.

Materials and methods

Yeast strains and plasmids

Request a detailed protocol

Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains used in this study are listed in Supplementary file 1 and are derived from the W303 background (Thomas and Rothstein, 1989). Strains were constructed using established gene disruption and genomic tagging methods (Janke et al., 2004; Longtine et al., 1998). For yeast two-hybrid analyses, the reporter strain PJ69-4A was used (James et al., 1996). Plasmids used in this study are listed in Supplementary file 2 and were constructed using standard DNA cloning techniques and verified by sequencing.

Growth analyses of yeast mutant strains

Request a detailed protocol

To investigate growth phenotypes of plasmid-derived spb4 mutant alleles, LEU2 plasmids carrying the respective constructs were transformed into a SPB4 shuffle (spb4Δ YCplac33-PSPB4-SPB4) strain. Growth phenotypes of the mutant alleles were analysed on plates containing 1 g/l 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA) (Apollo Scientific, Cat# PC4054) to select for cells that have lost the wild-type SPB4-containing URA3 plasmid. To analyse growth phenotypes of plasmid-derived rrp17 mutant alleles, a RRP17-HA-AID strain was transformed with plasmids carrying respective constructs and growth assessed upon Rrp17-HA-AID depletion on plates containing 2 mM auxin (3-indoleacetic acid) (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat# I2886). Genetic experiments were performed at least in two biological replicates.

Yeast two-hybrid analyses

Request a detailed protocol

Plasmids expressing the Spb4 bait protein, fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain (GAL4-BD), and the Rrp17 prey protein constructs, fused to the GAL4 activation domain (GAL4-AD), were co-transformed into the reporter strain PJ69-4A (James et al., 1996). Yeast two-hybrid interactions were documented by spotting representative transformants in tenfold serial dilution steps on SDC-Leu-Trp and SDC-Leu-Trp-His (HIS3 reporter gene) plates.

Over-expression and affinity purification of yeast proteins

Request a detailed protocol

An N-terminal protein A-TEV-Cbp-HA (TAP-HA)-REA1 fusion was over-expressed from a centromeric plasmid under the control of the galactose-inducible GAL1-10 promoter. Cells were grown in synthetic galactose complete medium lacking leucine (SGC-Leu) to an OD600 value of around 1.5. The medium was supplemented with 1.2% galactose, 1.2% bacto peptone, and 0.6% yeast extract (final concentrations) and cells further grown to an OD600 value of ~6. Cells were harvested and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –20°C. Cells were lysed in lysis buffer containing 25  mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 250  mM NaCl, 10  mM MgCl2, 10  mM KCl, 5% glycerol, 0.01% NP-40, 1  mM DTT, 0.5  mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and 1× SIGMAFAST protease inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat# S8830), by shaking in a bead beater (Fritsch) in the presence of glass beads. The lysate was cleared by consecutive centrifugation at 5000 and 18,000  rpm and incubated with IgG Sepharose 6 Fast Flow beads (GE Healthcare; Cat# 17096902) on a rotating wheel for 120  min at 4°C. Beads were extensively washed with lysis buffer (without protease inhibitors) and subsequently eluted through TEV cleavage at 16°C for 150  min. A final concentration of 2 mM CaCl2 was added to the protein eluate prior to incubation with Calmodulin agarose beads (G-Biosciences; Cat# 786–282) for 90 min at 4°C. After extensive washing with lysis buffer containing 2 mM CaCl2, the protein was eluted by three consecutive incubations with elution buffer containing 50 mM TRIS (pH 8.0), 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 8 mM EGTA, 0,01% NP-40 for 20 min at 4°C. EGTA-eluates were pooled and concentrated to a final concentration of ~2  mg/ml using an Amicon Ultra-4 cellulose centrifugal filter unit (Merck Millipore, Cat# UFC810024).

The pentameric Rix1(2)–Ipi3(2)–Ip1 complex, was over-expressed from 2 micron plasmids harbouring RIX1-TEV-proteinA, IPI1-Cbp, and untagged IPI3 under control of the inducible GAL1-10 promoter. Cells were grown in synthetic raffinose complete medium lacking leucine and tryptophane (SRC-Leu-Trp) to an OD600 value of around 1.5. Protein co-expression was induced by addition of an equal volume of double concentrated YPG medium for 6–7 hr. Cell harvesting and protein purification until elution with EGTA (in buffer without NP-40) was performed as described above. EGTA-eluates were concentrated and further purified by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) on a Superose 6 increase 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with lysis buffer. The respective fractions were pooled and concentrated to a final concentration of ~2  mg/ml using Amicon Ultra-4 cellulose filter units.

Affinity purification of pre-ribosomal 60S particles

Request a detailed protocol

For two-step affinity purifications from yeast, respective Flag-TEV-proteinA (FTpA) tagged bait proteins were expressed under control of their native promoter. Yeast strains were grown in YPD (for endogenous bait proteins) or in synthetic dextrose complete (SDC) medium lacking leucine (for plasmid-derived bait proteins or maintenance of plasmid-derived mutants) at 30°C. Cells were harvested in the logarithmic growth phase, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –20°C. For depletion of auxin-inducible degron (AID) tagged proteins (as indicated in the figures), cultures were incubated in the presence of 0.5  mM auxin (3-indoleacetic acid, Sigma-Aldrich, Cat# I2886) for 120  min prior to harvesting the cells. Cell pellets were resuspended in lysis buffer containing 50  mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 100  mM NaCl, 5  mM MgCl2, 0.05% NP-40, 1  mM DTT, supplemented with 1  mM PMSF, 1 × SIGMAFAST protease inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich), and cells were ruptured by shaking in a bead beater (Fritsch) in the presence of glass beads. Lysates were cleared by two subsequent centrifugation steps at 4°C for 10 and 30  min at 5000 and 15,000  rpm, respectively. Supernatants were incubated with immunoglobulin G (IgG) Sepharose 6 Fast Flow beads (GE Healthcare) on a rotating wheel at 4°C for 90  min. Beads were transferred into Mobicol columns (MoBiTec) and, after washing with 15  ml of lysis buffer (per 2 l culture volume), cleavage with tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease was performed at 16°C for 120  min. In a second purification step, TEV eluates were incubated with Flag agarose beads (ANTI-FlagM2 Affinity Gel, Sigma-Aldrich, Cat# A2220) for 75  min at 4°C. After washing with 5  ml of lysis buffer, bound proteins were eluted with lysis buffer containing 300  µg/ml Flag peptide (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat# F3290) at 4°C for 45  min. Buffer lacking NP-40 was used for the last purification step in samples used for cryo-EM. Flag eluates were analysed by SDS-PAGE on 4–12% polyacrylamide gels (NuPAGE, Invitrogen, Cat# NP0322BOX) with colloidal Coomassie staining (Roti-blue, Carl Roth, Cat# A152.1) or by western blotting with antibodies, as indicated in the respective figures. Pre-60S affinity purifications were performed at least in two technical replicates.

In vitro maturation assays with purified pre-ribosomal 60S particles

Request a detailed protocol

Yeast strains expressing chromosomal SPB4-FTpA (or plasmid derived YCplac111-SPB4-FTpA and YCplac111-spb4_R360A-FTpA for experiments in Figure 4—figure supplement 1B), RRP17-FTpA, or TAP-HA-YTM1 RPL3-Flag fusions under control of the respective endogenous promoters were grown in YPD or SDC-Leu medium and as indicated in the figures incubated in the presence of 0.5  mM auxin (3-indoleacetic acid, Sigma-Aldrich) for 120  min prior to harvesting the cells. Pre-ribosomal particles were purified via immunoglobulin G (IgG) Sepharose 6 Fast Flow beads (GE Healthcare) as described above. TEV-eluates were adjusted to a final volume of 0.5 ml and, as indicated in the figures, incubated with ATP (3 mM final concentration) (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat# A2383), purified Rea1 protein, and/or purified Rix1-complex on a rotating wheel for 45 min at room temperature. Subsequently, samples were chilled on ice and still bound material was re-isolated by incubation with anti-Flag agarose beads (ANTI-FlagM2 Affinity Gel, Sigma-Aldrich) for 60  min at 4°C and eluted and analysed as described above. The release assays with Spb4 particles were performed at least in three technical replicates.

Western blotting

Request a detailed protocol

Western blot analysis was performed using the following antibodies: anti-Nog1 antibody (1:5000), anti-Nog2 antibody (1:20,000), anti-Arx1 antibody (1:2,000), anti-Nsa2 antibody (1:10,000), anti-Rlp24 antibody (1:2,000), provided by Micheline Fromont-Racine, anti-Nug1 antibody (1:10,000), anti-Bud20 antibody (1:5000), provided by Vikram Panse, anti-Ytm1 antibody (1:100), provided by John Woolford, anti-Has1 antibody (1:10,000) provided by Patrick Linder, anti-Ebp2 antibody (1:10,000), provided by Keiko Mizuta, anti-Noc3 antibody (1:1000), provided by Herbert Tschochner, anti-Rpl3 antibody (1:5,000), provided by Jonathan Warner, anti-Rsa4 antibody (1:10,000), provided by Miguel Remacha, anti-Arc1 antibody (1:5000, raised in the Hurt lab), horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated anti-Flag antibody (1:10,000; Sigma-Aldrich, Cat# A8592, RRID:AB_439702), horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated anti-HA antibody (1:5000; Roche, Cat# 12013819001; RRID:AB_390917), secondary horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (1:2,000; Bio-Rad, Cat# 166-2408EDU, RRID:AB_11125345), and secondary horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (1:2,000; Bio-Rad, Cat# STAR105P, RRID:AB_323002).

Cryo-EM sample preparation, analysis, and image processing

Request a detailed protocol

All purified samples were supplemented with 0.05% octaethylene glycol monododecyl ether. The samples (3.5 µl) were applied onto Quantifoil R3/3 Holey grids with 2 nm continuous carbon support, which were glow discharged with a Harrick PDC-32G plasma cleaner at 2.1 × 10–1 torr for 20 s. After a 45 s incubation time, the grids were blotted for 3 s and plunge frozen in liquid ethane using a Vitrobot Mark IV (FEI Company) operated at 4°C and 90% humidity.

Cryo-EM data were collected on a Titan Krios operated at 300 kV, equipped with a Gatan K2 direct electron detector. Images were acquired with a nominal pixel size of 1.059 Å under low-dose conditions, with a total dose of 42.4–46.8 e-/Å2 over 40 frames using EPU (Thermo Fisher). Gain corrected frames were dose-weighted, aligned, summed, and motion corrected with MotionCor2 (Zheng et al., 2017) and the contrast-transfer-function (CTF) parameters were estimated with CTFFIND4 and Gctf (Rohou and Grigorieff, 2015; Zhang, 2016).

The micrographs were manually inspected and low-quality micrographs were discarded. Particles were auto-picked without reference in Relion 3.1 (Zivanov et al., 2020; Zivanov et al., 2018) using the Laplacian-of-Gaussian blob detection. The particles were extracted and imported into CryoSPARC (Punjani et al., 2017) for iterative 2D classification and good 2D classes were selected and used for homogeneous refinement with the EMD-3891 map (lowpass filtered to 60 Å) as an initial reference (Kater et al., 2017). Particles were reimported into Relion 3.1 using the pyem (csparc2star.py) tool and 3× binned particles were extracted with 3.177 Å/pixel. All subsequent 3D refinements and 3D classifications steps were performed with Relion 3.1. For details see sorting schemes in Figure 3—figure supplement 1, Figure 4—figure supplement 3, and Figure 4—figure supplement 3. The particles of the final classes were extracted with a pixel size of 1.059 Å/pixel, and homogeneous refinements, local refinements, and local filtering were performed with CryoSPARC. Composite maps were generated with ChimeraX using the vop max command (Goddard et al., 2018; Pettersen et al., 2021).

For the uniform data processing and comparison of the untreated Spb4 control sample and the in vitro release sample, the micrographs of both dataset were joined in Relion 3.1 and processed as described above. Particle numbers of the Spb4 control dataset and the in vitro release dataset of each class were obtained through the unique optic groups identifiers of the datasets.

Model building and refinement

Request a detailed protocol

The model PDB-6ELZ (Kater et al., 2017) was fitted into the density map of the State E particle and was used as an initial model. The overall better resolution of our cryo-EM map compared to the original reconstruction allowed us to improve the state E model (PDB-6ELZ). In particular, molecular models of Rrp17, Loc1, Noc2, and parts of Spb1 were built de novo in Coot (Emsley et al., 2010; Emsley and Cowtan, 2004). For the Spb4 model, swiss-model (Waterhouse et al., 2018) and alphaFold models (Jumper et al., 2021) were used as initial references. The RecA domains were rigid body fitted separately into the density and the C-terminus was built de novo. For the state D, we used our molecular model of the state E, the PDB entries 6C0F (Sanghai et al., 2018) and 6EM5 (Kater et al., 2017) as initial references. The model of state E without Rrp17 was generated with our model of state E as initial reference. The model was rigid body fitted into the cryo-EM map and badly resolved and/or missing parts including Rrp17 and the Spb1-MTD were deleted. For the release state particle, the state E model and the NE1 state model PDB-6YLX (Kater et al., 2020) were used as reference. All models were manually adjusted in Coot (Emsley et al., 2010; Emsley and Cowtan, 2004) and the final models were real-space refined using Phenix (Adams et al., 2010; Liebschner et al., 2019). Data collection and refinement statistics are summarized in Supplementary file 3.

ChimeraX was used to visualize molecular models and cryo-EM densities (Goddard et al., 2018; Pettersen et al., 2021). The model-based secondary structure predictions of rRNA H62/H63/H63a and the ITS2 were generated with Forna (Kerpedjiev et al., 2015).

Data availability

Atomic models reported in this study have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and can be retrieved using the following accession codes: 8BVN, 8BVU, 8BVV, 8BVY. Cryo-EM density maps have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) and can be retrieved using the following accession codes: 16267, 16272, 16273, 16275, 16276, 16277, 16278. Yeast strains and plasmids are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

The following data sets were generated

References

    1. Emsley P
    2. Cowtan K
    (2004) Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics
    Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography 60:2126–2132.
    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444904019158
    1. Emsley P
    2. Lohkamp B
    3. Scott WG
    4. Cowtan K
    (2010) Features and development of coot
    Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography 66:486–501.
    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444910007493

Decision letter

  1. Ruben L Gonzalez
    Reviewing Editor; Columbia University, United States
  2. James L Manley
    Senior Editor; Columbia University, United States
  3. Arlen W Johnson
    Reviewer; University of Texas, Austin, United States

Our editorial process produces two outputs: (i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; (ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Concurrent remodelling of nucleolar 60S subunit precursors by the Rea1 ATPase and Spb4 RNA helicase" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, one of whom is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors, and the evaluation has been overseen by Ruben Gonzalez as the Reviewing Editor and James Manley as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in the review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Arlen W Johnson (Reviewer #3).

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions:

1) As requested by all three reviewers, the authors must revise the text to acknowledge, cite, and discuss the recent publication by Cruz et al., (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-022-00874-9) in all the appropriate places in the manuscript.

2) The authors should address the remaining points listed in Reviewer 2's Comments for the Authors and the Major Points raised in Reviewer 3's Public Review and Comments for the Authors.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

The observation that the RecA domains of Spb4 are in their closed state while Spb4 is bound to ADP in the cryo-EM structure of the Spb4 particle as well as the interpretation and mechanistic implications of this observation is a major finding of this work. Nonetheless, I wonder whether the resolution of the structure truly allows the authors to distinguish between ADP and ATP. The segmented density for ADP shown in the model of the nucleotide-binding site of Spb4 in Figure 3M doesn't really allow an assessment of this issue. Given the importance of this observation to the work, the authors should provide a deeper assessment of the data in this regard and present a more complete argument excluding the possibility that ATP (or ADP-Pi, see below) might occupy the nucleotide-binding site. More importantly, the authors' conclusion in this regard is supported by the recent publication of Cruz et al., (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-022-00874-9), and this publication should be discussed and cited in this context.

Related to the previous point, given that the RecA domains are closed, even if ATP has been hydrolyzed, I wonder whether and how the inorganic phosphate (Pi) has dissociated from the nucleotide-binding site. In my view, the question of whether and how the closing/opening dynamics of the RecA domains of DEAD-box helicases are coupled to ATP binding, ATP hydrolysis, and/or π release field remains open in the field. My understanding is that the majority of the field expects closing to be coupled to ATP binding and opening to be coupled to ATP hydrolysis or π release. Interestingly, previous work from the Klostermeier group on a different DEAD-box helicase, eIF4A, suggests that the closing/opening dynamics are faster than ATP binding, ATP hydrolysis, or π release (Harms, et al. (2014) NAR 42, 7911), but the mechanism ultimately proposed in that work is that closing is coupled to ATP binding and opening is coupled to π release, in line with what I think is the predominant view. In this context, I think the findings reported here will be of great interest and importance to the DEAD-box helicase field. Assuming they can strengthen their conclusion that Spb4 is bound to ADP (see previous point), the authors should expand their discussion of these issues and contextualize their findings that the RecA domains of Spb4 are closed while Spb4 is bound to ADP relative to previous work and mechanistic models in the field. Related to this, I agree with the authors that the contacts the C-terminal domain of Spb4 makes with the substrate might be relevant and might uniquely stabilize Spb4 in a conformation in which the RecA domains are in the closed conformation while Spb4 is bound to ADP.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

1. "Our cryo-EM structure of substrate-bound Spb4 for the first time suggests how such RNA strand displacement and re-arrangement by a DEAD-box helicase attached to its pre-ribosomal substrate is orchestrated". Please modify the text and incorporate some discussion of the recently published work on Spb4 (Cruz et al., https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-022-00874-9) into the manuscript.

2. P7 line 221: The authors discuss the identification of the likely SAH ligand and the 2'-O-ribose methylation of G2922. More context should be provided on the functional role of this modification in light of the recent study from the Taylor/Johnson labs which should be cited in the current manuscript (Yelland, J.N., Bravo, J.P.K., Black, J.J. et al. A single 2′-O-methylation of ribosomal RNA gates assembly of a functional ribosome. Nat Struct Mol Biol (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-022-00891-8).

3. On p9 line 266, the authors suggest that Spb4 "induces" bending and strand separation of the rRNA at the base of ES27. They also suggest that the CTD of Spb4 "induces" substrate RNA strand disruption. However, no experimental evidence is provided to support these claims. The authors should consider citing the global SHAPE analysis showing that the H62-H63-ES27 region forms stable duplexes (Burlacu et al. 2017) and footprinting experiments showing that Spb4 disrupts this base pairing (Bruning et al. 2018) (also further analysed by Cruz et al. 2022) as this seems to provide further support their proposed model.

4. Can the authors comment more broadly on what insights their maps provide on the formation of the H61-H64 junction and the H61-H62-H64 three-way junction?

5. "Furthermore, a conserved tryptophan (W536) within the flexible C-terminal tail of the CTD (aa 500-606) intercalates between nucleotides of helices H62/H63/H63a and thereby might prevent this rRNA region to adopt its mature-like fold as seen in the nucleoplasmic pre-60S particles (Figures 3C and 3L)". This seems like a reasonable hypothesis, but are there any experimental data to support it? Please comment.

6. The authors should reference the recent publications from the Bohnsack and Henras groups showing how the related RNA DEAD-box helicase Dbp7 functions in pre-rRNA folding.

7. P4, line 109: the authors write "our high-resolution cryo-EM structure". What does this term mean? It would be preferable to remove this term and simply state a range of resolutions.

8. Figure 1- Please clarify in the legend what II, II, and VI signify?

9. Figure 4A-The presentation of the input +/- at the top of the panel is missing some labels. Please correct.

10. Some of the details in the figures are difficult to see in the pdf file eg Figure 3L, the Trp residue is unclear. Please try to improve the presentation/labelling.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84877.sa1

Author response

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

The observation that the RecA domains of Spb4 are in their closed state while Spb4 is bound to ADP in the cryo-EM structure of the Spb4 particle as well as the interpretation and mechanistic implications of this observation is a major finding of this work. Nonetheless, I wonder whether the resolution of the structure truly allows the authors to distinguish between ADP and ATP. The segmented density for ADP shown in the model of the nucleotide-binding site of Spb4 in Figure 3M doesn't really allow an assessment of this issue. Given the importance of this observation to the work, the authors should provide a deeper assessment of the data in this regard and present a more complete argument excluding the possibility that ATP (or ADP-Pi, see below) might occupy the nucleotide-binding site. More importantly, the authors' conclusion in this regard is supported by the recent publication of Cruz et al., (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-022-00874-9), and this publication should be discussed and cited in this context.

We agree that the Figure 3M doesn’t allow for a sufficient assessment of the mentioned nucleotide issue. We therefore changed main Figure 3M and added another figure to the supplement (Figure3—figure supplement 4E) displaying this region of the map in a clearer way and together with rigid body fitted RNA helicase models containing ADP, the ATP analogue ADPNP, ADP BeF3 or ADP PI. It can be better appreciated now that the map corresponds to an ADP molecule without any additional density to accommodate the γ-phosphate of an ATP molecule. The local resolution of this region of about 3.0 to 3.5 Å is sufficient to draw this conclusion unambiguously. This notion is further supported by the finding that we can observe density for a nearby magnesium ion in its expected position.

As suggested by the reviewer, we discuss this issue in the context of the supporting findings or Cruz et al. in the revised text.

Related to the previous point, given that the RecA domains are closed, even if ATP has been hydrolyzed, I wonder whether and how the inorganic phosphate (Pi) has dissociated from the nucleotide-binding site. In my view, the question of whether and how the closing/opening dynamics of the RecA domains of DEAD-box helicases are coupled to ATP binding, ATP hydrolysis, and/or π release field remains open in the field. My understanding is that the majority of the field expects closing to be coupled to ATP binding and opening to be coupled to ATP hydrolysis or π release. Interestingly, previous work from the Klostermeier group on a different DEAD-box helicase, eIF4A, suggests that the closing/opening dynamics are faster than ATP binding, ATP hydrolysis, or π release (Harms, et al. (2014) NAR 42, 7911), but the mechanism ultimately proposed in that work is that closing is coupled to ATP binding and opening is coupled to π release, in line with what I think is the predominant view. In this context, I think the findings reported here will be of great interest and importance to the DEAD-box helicase field. Assuming they can strengthen their conclusion that Spb4 is bound to ADP (see previous point), the authors should expand their discussion of these issues and contextualize their findings that the RecA domains of Spb4 are closed while Spb4 is bound to ADP relative to previous work and mechanistic models in the field. Related to this, I agree with the authors that the contacts the C-terminal domain of Spb4 makes with the substrate might be relevant and might uniquely stabilize Spb4 in a conformation in which the RecA domains are in the closed conformation while Spb4 is bound to ADP.

We have added some discussion in which we better explain the general model on closure/opening of the catalytic RecA domains. Furthermore, we proposed in the discussion that on complex substrates such as pre-ribosomes the states of the domains may be regulated in a more complicated manner than so far expected and referred also to the work of the Klostermeier group (Harms et al. 2014) revealing that additional factors/cofactors can modulate the conformation of the catalytic domain.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

1. "Our cryo-EM structure of substrate-bound Spb4 for the first time suggests how such RNA strand displacement and re-arrangement by a DEAD-box helicase attached to its pre-ribosomal substrate is orchestrated". Please modify the text and incorporate some discussion of the recently published work on Spb4 (Cruz et al., https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-022-00874-9) into the manuscript.

We have modified the sentence accordingly and added a citation of the study recently published by Cruz et al. Furthermore, we are citing the study in the introduction and discussion, and we are pointing out the major difference between the two structures regarding the nucleotide binding state of Spb4.

2. P7 line 221: The authors discuss the identification of the likely SAH ligand and the 2'-O-ribose methylation of G2922. More context should be provided on the functional role of this modification in light of the recent study from the Taylor/Johnson labs which should be cited in the current manuscript (Yelland, J.N., Bravo, J.P.K., Black, J.J. et al. A single 2′-O-methylation of ribosomal RNA gates assembly of a functional ribosome. Nat Struct Mol Biol (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-022-00891-8).

We added a sentence on the importance of the G2922 methylation that is recognized by Nog2 during pre-60S maturation, which was recently revealed by the mentioned work of the Johnson/Taylor labs. As suggested by Reviewer #3, we furthermore cited the publication by Lapeyre and Purushothaman in this context.

3. On p9 line 266, the authors suggest that Spb4 "induces" bending and strand separation of the rRNA at the base of ES27. They also suggest that the CTD of Spb4 "induces" substrate RNA strand disruption. However, no experimental evidence is provided to support these claims. The authors should consider citing the global SHAPE analysis showing that the H62-H63-ES27 region forms stable duplexes (Burlacu et al. 2017) and footprinting experiments showing that Spb4 disrupts this base pairing (Bruning et al. 2018) (also further analysed by Cruz et al. 2022) as this seems to provide further support their proposed model.

We added a sentence pointing out that the proposed induced bending and disruption of the H62/H63/H63a rRNA by Spb4 is in agreement with existing structural probing data.

4. Can the authors comment more broadly on what insights their maps provide on the formation of the H61-H64 junction and the H61-H62-H64 three-way junction?

With respect to junction formation, the overall positioning of rRNA H61-H64 does not change substantially between our Spb4-bound state E and the known subsequent states after Spb4 release, and also the junction directly connecting H61-H64 is already established and doesn’t change. The H61-H62-H64 three-way junction, however, is not well resolved in our Spb4-bound and also not in the Spb4 post-release maps. Therefore, our maps do not provide precise insights on the exact conditions (binding of additional AFs or ribosomal proteins might be required) and time point for the maturation of this junction, apart from the observation that in the Spb4-bound state it is partially disordered and adopts in the known later states (NE1) its defined mature conformation.

5. "Furthermore, a conserved tryptophan (W536) within the flexible C-terminal tail of the CTD (aa 500-606) intercalates between nucleotides of helices H62/H63/H63a and thereby might prevent this rRNA region to adopt its mature-like fold as seen in the nucleoplasmic pre-60S particles (Figures 3C and 3L)". This seems like a reasonable hypothesis, but are there any experimental data to support it? Please comment.

As we have no experimental data to support this hypothesis, we adjusted this sentence accordingly.

6. The authors should reference the recent publications from the Bohnsack and Henras groups showing how the related RNA DEAD-box helicase Dbp7 functions in pre-rRNA folding.

We are now citing these two publications in the discussion.

7. P4, line 109: the authors write "our high-resolution cryo-EM structure". What does this term mean? It would be preferable to remove this term and simply state a range of resolutions.

We have removed the unspecific term “high-resolution”.

8. Figure 1- Please clarify in the legend what II, II, and VI signify?

The numbers signify the catalytic helicase core signature motifs I, II, and VI. We have now clarified this in the figure legend.

9. Figure 4A-The presentation of the input +/- at the top of the panel is missing some labels. Please correct.

Thank you for pointing this out, we have added the missing labels in Figure 4A.

10. Some of the details in the figures are difficult to see in the pdf file eg Figure 3L, the Trp residue is unclear. Please try to improve the presentation/labelling.

As suggested, we improved the presentation and labelling in Figure 3L.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84877.sa2

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Valentin Mitterer

    Biochemistry Center, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing
    Contributed equally with
    Matthias Thoms
    For correspondence
    mitterer.valentin@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1587-1194

  2. Matthias Thoms

    Gene Center, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review and editing
    Contributed equally with
    Valentin Mitterer
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8084-6097

  3. Robert Buschauer

    Gene Center, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    Contribution
    Software, Formal analysis
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  4. Otto Berninghausen

    Gene Center, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  5. Ed Hurt

    Biochemistry Center, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
    Contribution
    Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    ed.hurt@bzh.uni-heidelberg.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  6. Roland Beckmann

    Gene Center, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    Contribution
    Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    beckmann@genzentrum.lmu.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4291-3898

Funding

European Research Council (885711-Human-Ribogenesis)

  • Roland Beckmann

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (HU363/15-2)

  • Ed Hurt

European Research Council (ADG 741781 GLOWSOME)

  • Ed Hurt

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank C Ungewickell and S Rieder for cryo-EM data collection. We thank Dieter Kressler for providing the SPB4 shuffle strain and Petra Ihrig and Jürgen Reichert from the BZH Heidelberg MS facility for performing mass spectrometry analyses.

This work was supported by grants from the German Research Council (HU363/15-2 to EH), and from the European Research Council (885711-Human-Ribogenesis to RB and ADG 741781 GLOWSOME to EH).

Senior Editor

  1. James L Manley, Columbia University, United States

Reviewing Editor

  1. Ruben L Gonzalez, Columbia University, United States

Reviewer

  1. Arlen W Johnson, University of Texas, Austin, United States

Version history

  1. Received: November 12, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: November 15, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: March 16, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: March 17, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: March 21, 2023 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record published: May 2, 2023 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2023, Mitterer, Thoms et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 647
    Page views
  • 116
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Valentin Mitterer
  2. Matthias Thoms
  3. Robert Buschauer
  4. Otto Berninghausen
  5. Ed Hurt
  6. Roland Beckmann
(2023)
Concurrent remodelling of nucleolar 60S subunit precursors by the Rea1 ATPase and Spb4 RNA helicase
eLife 12:e84877.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84877

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cancer Biology

    FOXP2 confers oncogenic effects in prostate cancer

    Xiaoquan Zhu, Chao Chen ... Yanyang Zhao
    Research Article Updated

    Identification oncogenes is fundamental to revealing the molecular basis of cancer. Here, we found that FOXP2 is overexpressed in human prostate cancer cells and prostate tumors, but its expression is absent in normal prostate epithelial cells and low in benign prostatic hyperplasia. FOXP2 is a FOX transcription factor family member and tightly associated with vocal development. To date, little is known regarding the link of FOXP2 to prostate cancer. We observed that high FOXP2 expression and frequent amplification are significantly associated with high Gleason score. Ectopic expression of FOXP2 induces malignant transformation of mouse NIH3T3 fibroblasts and human prostate epithelial cell RWPE-1. Conversely, FOXP2 knockdown suppresses the proliferation of prostate cancer cells. Transgenic overexpression of FOXP2 in the mouse prostate causes prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Overexpression of FOXP2 aberrantly activates oncogenic MET signaling and inhibition of MET signaling effectively reverts the FOXP2-induced oncogenic phenotype. CUT&Tag assay identified FOXP2-binding sites located in MET and its associated gene HGF. Additionally, the novel recurrent FOXP2-CPED1 fusion identified in prostate tumors results in high expression of truncated FOXP2, which exhibit a similar capacity for malignant transformation. Together, our data indicate that FOXP2 is involved in tumorigenicity of prostate.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology

    Fluorescein-based sensors to purify human a-cells for functional and transcriptomic analyses

    Sevim Kahraman, Kimitaka Shibue ... Rohit N Kulkarni
    Tools and Resources

    Pancreatic a-cells secrete glucagon, an insulin counter-regulatory peptide hormone critical for the maintenance of glucose homeostasis. Investigation of the function of human a-cells remains a challenge due to the lack of cost-effective purification methods to isolate high-quality a-cells from islets. Here, we use the reaction-based probe diacetylated Zinpyr1 (DA-ZP1) to introduce a novel and simple method for enriching live a-cells from dissociated human islet cells with ~ 95% purity. The a-cells, confirmed by sorting and immunostaining for glucagon, were cultured up to 10 days to form a-pseudoislets. The a-pseudoislets could be maintained in culture without significant loss of viability, and responded to glucose challenge by secreting appropriate levels of glucagon. RNA-sequencing analyses (RNA-seq) revealed that expression levels of key a-cell identity genes were sustained in culture while some of the genes such as DLK1, GSN, SMIM24 were altered in a-pseudoislets in a time-dependent manner. In conclusion, we report a method to sort human primary a-cells with high purity that can be used for downstream analyses such as functional and transcriptional studies.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology

    Inositol pyrophosphate dynamics reveals control of the yeast phosphate starvation program through 1,5-IP8 and the SPX domain of Pho81

    Valentin Chabert, Geun-Don Kim ... Andreas Mayer
    Research Article

    Eukaryotic cells control inorganic phosphate to balance its role as essential macronutrient with its negative bioenergetic impact on reactions liberating phosphate. Phosphate homeostasis depends on the conserved INPHORS signaling pathway that utilizes inositol pyrophosphates and SPX receptor domains. Since cells synthesize various inositol pyrophosphates and SPX domains bind them promiscuously, it is unclear whether a specific inositol pyrophosphate regulates SPX domains in vivo, or whether multiple inositol pyrophosphates act as a pool. In contrast to previous models, which postulated that phosphate starvation is signaled by increased production of the inositol pyrophosphate 1-IP7, we now show that the levels of all detectable inositol pyrophosphates of yeast, 1-IP7, 5-IP7, and 1,5-IP8, strongly decline upon phosphate starvation. Among these, specifically the decline of 1,5-IP8 triggers the transcriptional phosphate starvation response, the PHO pathway. 1,5-IP8 inactivates the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor Pho81 through its SPX domain. This stimulates the cyclin-dependent kinase Pho85-Pho80 to phosphorylate the transcription factor Pho4 and repress the PHO pathway. Combining our results with observations from other systems, we propose a unified model where 1,5-IP8 signals cytosolic phosphate abundance to SPX proteins in fungi, plants, and mammals. Its absence triggers starvation responses.