Flowering: Keeping it cool

A well-established model for how plants start the process of flowering in periods of cold weather may need revisiting.
  1. Vy Nguyen
  2. Iain Searle  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Australia

The timing of flowering is one of the most important transitions during the life of a plant. Synchronising the flowering period with warmer temperatures enhances the reproductive success of a plant (and its impact on pollinators). To do so, plants must be able to sense cold temperatures, distinguish between short- and long-term periods of cold, and remember when these changes take place. This requires a complex interplay between internal regulators and environmental cues (Simpson and Dean, 2002; Wellmer and Riechmann, 2010).

In some plants, such as the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, prolonged periods of cold lasting several weeks are required to initiate flowering via a process known as vernalisation. During this time, a gene called Flowering Locus C (FLC), which acts as a brake to flowering, gets switched off by epigenetic processes that stably hold the gene in the off position long after the vernalisation period (Michaels and Amasino, 1999; Sheldon et al., 1999; Michaels and Amasino, 2000; Whittaker and Dean, 2017).

Several decades of intensive research using a wide range of techniques has led to a well-established model for how the flowering block imposed by FLC is regulated. A long, non-coding RNA, called COOLAIR, is thought to play an important role in this model. Since COOLAIR is an antisense RNA with a complementary sequence of nucleotides to FLC, it is assumed to be an ideal candidate for suppressing the expression of this gene. Now, in eLife, Ilha Lee and colleagues – including Myeongjune Jeon and Goowon Jeong as joint first authors – report new results that challenge this theory (Jeon et al., 2023).

To better understand the role of COOLAIR in vernalisation, the researchers – who are based at the Seoul National University, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the Peking University Institute of Advanced Agricultural Sciences – did a combination of molecular, genetic and physiology experiments before, during and after vernalisation in A. thaliana plants and cells to explore the role of COOLAIR and some DNA transcription factors, known as CBFs, in vernalisation.

In a search for factors involved in the early stages of the vernalisation process, Jeon et al. focussed on the cold signal transduction that regulates the transcription of COOLAIR. The results revealed that the CBFs are required for COOLAIR transcription (Figure 1). CBF proteins have been known to play a central role for plants to increase their tolerance to freezing but they had not been linked to the vernalisation response before. Moreover, the CBF-binding DNA sequence in the COOLAIR promoter (a critical sequence for transcription) is conserved amongst different plant species, suggesting the CBF-COOLAIR regulator mechanism evolved some significant time ago.

Vernalisation in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Some plants need a prolonged period of cold lasting several weeks to permit flowering in a process known as vernalisation. In A. thaliana, a gene called FLC stops plants from flowering during winter. During this time, FLC is highly expressed (black bars), but this activity is reduced after vernalisation. Jeong et al. show that early in the vernalisation process, CBF proteins (dark blue) bind to conserved DNA sequences (DREs) at the end of FLC to transcribe a long non-coding RNA, called COOLAIR (light blue). During vernalisation, the amount of CBFs increases, while COOLAIR levels decrease. The upstream regulator of CBF transcription remains unknown (shown as question mark).

In genetically modified plants that only had inactive forms of the genes coding for CBFs, cold-induced expression of COOLAIR was severely impaired. In modified plants with overactive CBF-coding genes, COOLAIR levels were high even when temperatures were warm. Unexpectedly, Jeon et al. found that these genetically modified plants were still able to go through vernalisation, even though they were unable to produce COOLAIR during the cold period. In addition, well described epigenetic histone modifications responsible for switching off the FLC gene remained unchanged before and after vernalisation in the genetically modified plants. This suggest that neither COOLAIR, nor the CBF transcription factors that transcribe COOLAIR, are required to induce vernalisation.

Jeon et al. used an elegant combination of genetic and molecular experiments to paint a compelling picture that suggests that the previously well-established vernalisation model requires updating. This is also in accordance with recent research, suggesting a similar theory (Helliwell et al., 2011; Luo et al., 2019). There are only a few genes where an in-depth analysis of how they are controlled has improved our overall knowledge of gene regulation. These include the trp operon genes in Escherichia coli, which regulate synthesis of the essential amino acid tryptophan and the beta-globin locus in mammals, famous for their involvement in the transport of oxygen (Yanofsky, 1981; Myers et al., 1986). It is clear the FLC locus also deserves a spot on this list.


Article and author information

Author details

  1. Vy Nguyen

    Vy Nguyen is in the Department of Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7369-7457
  2. Iain Searle

    Iain Searle is in the Department of Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

    For correspondence
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4306-9756

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: March 23, 2023 (version 1)


© 2023, Nguyen and Searle

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.


  • 484
    Page views
  • 56
  • 0

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Vy Nguyen
  2. Iain Searle
Flowering: Keeping it cool
eLife 12:e86885.

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Neuroscience
    Alan E Murphy, Nurun Fancy, Nathan Skene
    Research Article

    Mathys et al. conducted the first single-nucleus RNA-seq (snRNA-seq) study of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (Mathys et al., 2019). With bulk RNA-seq, changes in gene expression across cell types can be lost, potentially masking the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) across different cell types. Through the use of single-cell techniques, the authors benefitted from increased resolution with the potential to uncover cell type-specific DEGs in AD for the first time. However, there were limitations in both their data processing and quality control and their differential expression analysis. Here, we correct these issues and use best-practice approaches to snRNA-seq differential expression, resulting in 549 times fewer DEGs at a false discovery rate of 0.05. Thus, this study highlights the impact of quality control and differential analysis methods on the discovery of disease-associated genes and aims to refocus the AD research field away from spuriously identified genes.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    James T Anderson, Steven Henikoff, Kami Ahmad
    Research Article

    Spermatogenesis in the Drosophila male germline proceeds through a unique transcriptional program controlled both by germline-specific transcription factors and by testis-specific versions of core transcriptional machinery. This program includes the activation of genes on the heterochromatic Y chromosome, and reduced transcription from the X chromosome, but how expression from these sex chromosomes is regulated has not been defined. To resolve this, we profiled active chromatin features in the testes from wildtype and meiotic arrest mutants and integrate this with single-cell gene expression data from the Fly Cell Atlas. These data assign the timing of promoter activation for genes with germline-enriched expression throughout spermatogenesis, and general alterations of promoter regulation in germline cells. By profiling both active RNA polymerase II and histone modifications in isolated spermatocytes, we detail widespread patterns associated with regulation of the sex chromosomes. Our results demonstrate that the X chromosome is not enriched for silencing histone modifications, implying that sex chromosome inactivation does not occur in the Drosophila male germline. Instead, a lack of dosage compensation in spermatocytes accounts for the reduced expression from this chromosome. Finally, profiling uncovers dramatic ubiquitinylation of histone H2A and lysine-16 acetylation of histone H4 across the Y chromosome in spermatocytes that may contribute to the activation of this heterochromatic chromosome.