Potassium-mediated bacterial chemotactic response

Version of Record

The authors declare this version of their article to be the Version of Record.

Download
Cite
Share
CommentOpen annotations (there are currently 0 annotations on this page).

Version of Record published: June 4, 2024 (This version)
Reviewed preprint version 3: May 21, 2024 (Go to version)
Reviewed preprint version 2: March 19, 2024 (Go to version)
Reviewed preprint version 1: October 11, 2023 (Go to version)
Preprint posted: August 31, 2023 (Go to version)
Sent for peer review: August 11, 2023

1. Of interest
Neutralizing gut-derived lipopolysaccharide as a novel therapeutic strategy for severe leptospirosis

Xufeng Xie, Xi Chen ... Yongguo Cao

Research Article May 31, 2024
Further reading

Abstract
eLife assessment
Introduction
Results
Discussion
Materials and methods
Appendix 1
Data availability
References
Article and author information
Metrics

Abstract

Bacteria in biofilms secrete potassium ions to attract free swimming cells. However, the basis of chemotaxis to potassium remains poorly understood. Here, using a microfluidic device, we found that Escherichia coli can rapidly accumulate in regions of high potassium concentration on the order of millimoles. Using a bead assay, we measured the dynamic response of individual flagellar motors to stepwise changes in potassium concentration, finding that the response resulted from the chemotaxis signaling pathway. To characterize the chemotactic response to potassium, we measured the dose–response curve and adaptation kinetics via an Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) assay, finding that the chemotaxis pathway exhibited a sensitive response and fast adaptation to potassium. We further found that the two major chemoreceptors Tar and Tsr respond differently to potassium. Tar receptors exhibit a biphasic response, whereas Tsr receptors respond to potassium as an attractant. These different responses were consistent with the responses of the two receptors to intracellular pH changes. The sensitive response and fast adaptation allow bacteria to sense and localize small changes in potassium concentration. The differential responses of Tar and Tsr receptors to potassium suggest that cells at different growth stages respond differently to potassium and may have different requirements for potassium.

eLife assessment

In this important study, the authors report a novel measurement of the Escherichia coli chemotactic response and demonstrate that these bacteria display an attractant response to potassium, which is connected to intracellular pH level. The experimental evidence provided is convincing and the work will be of interest to microbiologists studying chemotaxis.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91452.4.sa0

Introduction

Potassium is an important ion in the normal physiological process of organisms (Gründling, 2013). Potassium ions are a major component in establishing the resting membrane potential and thus ensure proper function of the muscles and nerves. Potassium deficiency can affect many biological functions, such as human heartbeat (Zacchia et al., 2016) and photosynthesis and respiration of plants (Li et al., 2020). In prokaryotes, such as bacteria, potassium ions play a critical role in maintaining the osmotic pressure, pH value and membrane potential of cells (Ballal et al., 2007; Epstein, 2003). In addition, both the expression of genes and the activities of enzymes are also regulated by potassium ions (Ali et al., 2017; Ballal et al., 2007; Epstein, 2003; Nanatani et al., 2015).

Because of its central role in maintaining the normal physiological state of cells, organisms have evolved a series of regulatory systems to control the intracellular concentration of potassium ions, such as Na⁺/K⁺ ATP pumps in higher organisms and potassium transport systems in prokaryotes. Most of the studies on potassium have focused on its effects on cell physiology or the dynamics of potassium transport systems. In contrast, studies on the behavioral response to environmental potassium concentration changes and the signaling pathways involved are very limited for bacteria.

Bacteria sense and respond to chemicals via the chemotaxis signaling pathway. In Escherichia coli, chemo stimuli are detected by transmembrane receptors (Bray et al., 1998; Endres et al., 2008; Homma et al., 2004). The sensed signal is then transmitted to the associated cytoplasmic histidine kinase CheA, affecting its autophosphorylation (Li and Hazelbauer, 2011; Li et al., 2013). CheA transfers its phosphoryl group to the response regulator CheY and the methylesterase CheB, yielding CheY-P and CheB-P, respectively (Bren and Eisenbach, 2000). CheY-P binds to the base of the flagellar motor, increasing the probability of motor rotating clockwise (CW), namely motor CW bias, and thus increasing the cell tumble frequency (Dyer and Dahlquist, 2006; Lam et al., 2013; van Albada and Ten Wolde, 2009). The phosphatase CheZ binds to CheY-P and accelerates its dephosphorylation. CheB-P and CheR demethylate and methylate the receptors, respectively, to accomplish robust adaptation in chemotaxis (Djordjevic and Stock, 1997; Djordjevic and Stock, 1998; Levin et al., 2002; Lupas and Stock, 1989; Lybarger and Maddock, 1999).

Conventional stimuli are sensed by E. coli directly or indirectly. The former suggests that the ligand can bind to the periplasmic domain of the corresponding receptor directly and modify kinase activity, such as MeAsp and serine (Neumann et al., 2010; Tajima et al., 2011). The latter requires the help of binding proteins, such as maltose sensed by the Tar receptor with the help of periplasmic maltose-binding protein (Brass and Manson, 1984), and peptides sensed by the Tap receptor with the help of peptide-binding proteins (Manson et al., 1986). However, the detailed mechanism of bacterial sensing and response to ionic stimuli, such as the chemotactic repellent, nickel ions, is not clear (de Pina et al., 1995; Englert et al., 2010). The chemotactic response of other ions also remains to be studied.

It was discovered recently that bacteria in biofilms secrete potassium into their surroundings through ion channels on the cell membrane, thereby affecting the behavior of distant free bacteria and attracting them (Humphries et al., 2017; Prindle et al., 2015). However, how limited changes in potassium concentration regulate the movement of bacteria, especially after long-distance diffusion, is still unclear.

Here, we constructed a linear concentration gradient of potassium ions with a microfluidic device, and found obvious taxis to the region of high concentration for wild-type E. coli. To determine the origin of this taxis, we measured the response of motor speed and CW bias to a stepwise increase in potassium concentration. The motor CW bias exhibits an attractant-like response, while the motor speed remains constant, which suggests a constant proton motive force (PMF). The chemotaxis-defective strain did not respond to this stimulus. This confirmed that the CW bias response of motors resulted from the upstream chemotaxis signaling pathway. To further characterize the response of the chemotactic signal to potassium, we directly measured the response of kinase activity to different concentrations of potassium chloride by monitoring the Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) between CheY-eYFP (yellow fluorescent protein) and CheZ-eCFP (cyan fluorescent protein). We ruled out the possibility of osmotaxis by comparing the responses to 30 mM potassium chloride and 60 mM sucrose. The dose–response curve and step response of kinase activity to potassium suggested a sensitive sensing process and fast adaptation. Further experiments with mutants expressing Tar, Tsr, or no receptor suggested that this chemotactic response may result from the increase in intracellular pH. Our findings suggest a new mechanism of chemotactic response to ionic stimuli. Employing a coarse-grained chemotaxis model with parameters extracted from our measurements, we performed stochastic simulation of E. coli cells in a potassium gradient generated by a biofilm producing an oscillating potassium signal, and demonstrated the delayed periodic attraction of the cells to the biofilm.

Results

Chemotaxis in a linear concentration gradient of potassium

It has been reported that potassium ions work as a communication agent in swarms and biofilms for both Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. A high concentration of potassium chloride (300 mM) could attract swimming cells (Humphries et al., 2017; Prindle et al., 2015). To study the chemotactic response of E. coli to potassium, we set up a linear concentration profile of potassium chloride with a microfluidic device designed as described previously (Liu et al., 2022; Tian et al., 2021).

As shown in Figure 1A a five-channel diffusion device was constructed. 2% (wt/vol) agarose was injected into the two resistance channels through port (b) to block the passage of cells without influencing the diffusion of potassium. A 100-mM potassium chloride solution, prepared in the potassium-depleted motility buffer, flows through the source channel from port (a) to (a′), while potassium-depleted motility buffer flows through the sink channel from port (c) to (c′). Potassium diffuses from the source channel to the sink channel and forms a linear concentration gradient in the observation channel (Tian et al., 2021). The wild-type strain HCB1 was sealed in the observation channel through port (p) with a drop of hot agarose (2% wt/vol). The movements of the cells were recorded by a high-speed CMOS camera. Four movies were recorded. An example video is shown in Video 1. We calculated the displacement of the mean cell position for each movie. The average results are plotted in Figure 1B. The shaded area denotes standard error of the mean (SEM). We also computed the cell density profile along the y-axis in the observation channel at the initial time of t = 1 s and steady state (t = 300 s). As shown in Figure 1C, the green squares and blue dots are experimental data. The error bars denote SEM. We found that the distribution of cells is exponential at steady state, similar to the results of logarithmic chemotactic sensing in a linear MeAsp gradient (Kalinin et al., 2009). The red solid line denotes the exponential fit, with a fitted decay constant of 0.0085 ± 0.0004 μm⁻¹. As reported previously (Kalinin et al., 2009), the fitted exponential decay constant equals v_d/v_s, where v_d and v_s denote the drift velocity and cell motility constant, respectively. For wild-type E. coli with v_s = 53.2 μm²/s (Wu et al., 2006), we obtained a drift velocity v_d = 0.45 ± 0.02 μm/s.

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

The chemotaxis performance of E.coli in a linear concentration gradient of potassium.

(A) Design diagram of the microfluidic device. The source channel and sink were flowed with 100 mM KCl and motility buffer, respectively. The inlets of KCl, agarose, motility buffer, and cells are denoted by (a), (b), (c), and (p), respectively. The outlets are labeled by the corresponding letters with the prime symbol. (B) The average chemotaxis migration coefficient (CMC) of four datasets as a function of time for the wild-type strain (HCB1) under a linear concentration gradient of KCl. The shaded area denotes standard error of the mean (SEM). (C) The cell density profile in the observing channel along the y-axis at the beginning (t = 1 s, green squares) and a steady state (t = 300 s, blue dots). The red solid line is an exponential fit to the data. Error bars denote SEM.

Video 1

Download asset

posterframe for video — An example video of wild-type *E. coli* HCB1 cells swimming up the potassium gradient in a microfludic device.

The left side is the source channel. Scale bar = 20 µm.

According to our results, the wild-type strain exhibited significant movement toward the area of high concentration in a linear concentration gradient of potassium chloride, which was similar to its chemotaxis in a typical attractant concentration gradient (Jiang et al., 2010; Kalinin et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2022; Son et al., 2016). Thus, E. coli could be attracted by potassium and perform a trend movement in a linear gradient field on the order of millimoles. We sought to further investigate the characteristics and mechanisms of this attractant-like response.

The response of the motor rotational signal to potassium

Potassium is important for maintaining cell membrane potential, which is one of the two components of PMF. PMF is the energy source for the flagellar motor. The absolute value of the transmembrane electrical potential will decrease when the concentration of extracellular potassium increases. This may lead to a change in PMF and affect bacterial chemotaxis by directly changing the motor behavior. However, earlier studies found that a sudden change in membrane potential in E. coli would result in a reverse change in the transmembrane proton concentration difference, thus keeping PMF virtually constant (Bakker and Mangerich, 1981).

To test whether the chemotactic response of E. coli to potassium resulted from possible PMF changes, we monitored the motor response of the wild-type strain (JY26-pKAF131) to a stepwise addition of 30 mM potassium chloride using a bead assay. As shown in Figure 2A, the cell body was attached to a 0.01% poly-L-lysine-coated cover slide. A 1-μm-diameter bead was marked on the truncated filament. We used a high-speed CMOS camera to record the rotation of the bead. As shown in Figure 2B, the typical traces of motor rotational speed (blue line) and CW bias (purple line) were calculated. The positive and negative values of speed denote CCW (counter-clockwise) and CW rotation, respectively. The CW bias is positively correlated with the intracellular concentration of CheY-P (Cluzel et al., 2000), and the rotational speed is proportional to the PMF (Gabel and Berg, 2003). The stimulus (30 mM KCl) was added at t = 120 s and removed at t = 480 s. The average trace of 83 motors is shown in Figure 2C. The moments of addition and removal of stimulus were shifted to t = 0, which are marked by the purple dashed line and green dashed line, respectively. The CW bias decreased upon addition of potassium chloride, and then it adapted to a higher level than the pre-stimulus value. Such over adaptation was similar to the response of CW bias to sucrose in osomotaxis (Rosko et al., 2017). However, the motor speed remained constant during this process, confirming that the PMF remained constant, which was different from the osmotaxis response of motors. The results suggested that the response of motor CW bias to potassium was not due to PMF change. We performed further experiments with the chemotaxis-defective strain (HCB901-pBES38). The average result of 22 motors exhibited no response to 30 mM potassium chloride for either CW bias or speed (Figure 2D), especially on the time scale of the chemotactic response as seen in the wild-type cells. These results confirmed that the CW bias response of the motor to potassium resulted from the upstream chemotaxis signaling pathway.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

The response of motor rotational signal to potassium.

(A) Schematic diagram of the bead assay for the flagellar motor. (B) Typical trace of rotational speed (blue line) and clockwise (CW) bias (purple line) of individual motors for the wild-type strain (JY26-pKAF131). The positive and negative values of speed denote counter-clockwise (CCW) and CW rotation, respectively. 30 mM KCl was added at t = 120 s and removed at t = 480 s. (C) The average response of 83 motors from 5 samples for the wild-type strain to 30 mM KCl. The vertical purple (green) dashed lines indicate the moment of adding (removing) stimulus. The shaded areas denote standard error of the mean (SEM). (D) The average response of 22 motors from 4 samples for the chemotaxis-defective strain (HCB901-pBES38) to 30 mM KCl. The vertical purple (green) dashed lines indicate the moment of adding (removing) stimulus. The shaded areas denote SEM.

The response of the chemotactic signal to potassium

To directly measure the response of the chemotactic signal to potassium ions, we monitored the receptor-kinase activity in vivo by monitoring the FRET between CheY-eYFP and CheZ-eCFP.

Using the FRET setup described previously (Zhang et al., 2018), we measured the chemotactic response of a cell population with the wild-type strain (HCB1288-pVS88). We measured the response of the same sample to potassium chloride at different concentrations and to 100 μM MeAsp (a typical saturated attractant for the Tar receptor in E. coli). As shown in Figure 3A, potassium (blue solid line) induces a significant chemotactic response as an attractant. Compared with 100 μM MeAsp, 30 mM KCl resulted in a larger response and faster adaptation. Moreover, the chemotactic signal exhibits an imprecise adaptation. This is different from the over adaptation exhibited by motor CW bias. To exclude the effect of chloride ion, we quantitatively compared the response of the chemotactic signal to 10 mM KCl and 5 mM K₂SO₄, both of which contain 10 mM potassium ion with or without chloride ion. As shown in Figure 3—figure supplement 1, they induce similar responses. We also measured the response of the motor rotational signal to 15 mM K₂SO₄ using the bead assay and compared it with the response to 30 mM KCl (Figure 2C). The results are shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 1. The response of CW bias to 15 mM K₂SO₄ exhibited an attractant response, characterized by a decreased CW bias upon the addition of K₂SO₄, followed by an over-adaptation that is qualitatively similar to the response to 30 mM KCl. Thus, the chemotactic response mainly resulted from potassium ions rather than chloride ions.

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

The chemotactic response of the wild-type strain (HCB1288-pVS88) to potassium.

(A) Chemotactic response of the wild-type strain (HCB1288-pVS88) to stepwise addition and removal of KCl. The blue solid line denotes the orignal signal, and the red dots represent the pH-corrected signal, which was recalculated from the pH-corrected cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) and yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) channels using the response of the no-receptor strain. (B) Comparison of the chemotactic response to 30 mM KCl and 60 mM sucrose. The vertical purple (green) dashed lines indicate the moment of adding (removing) stimulus. (C) Quantitative comparison among the responses to 100 μM MeAsp, 30 mM KCl, and 60 mM sucrose. The hollow and solid red bars represent the value calculated from the original signal and the pH-coPlrrected signal, respectively. The errors denote standard error of the mean (SEM).

Earlier studies have shown that changes in osmotic pressure caused by a change in ion concentration on the millimole scale can also lead to chemotactic responses in E. coli by altering the interaction between receptors (Vaknin and Berg, 2006). Here, we obtained a similar over adaptation in the CW bias response of motors as that of osmotaxis. To determine whether the chemotactic response to potassium was due to changes in osmotic pressure, we compared the response to both 30 mM KCl and 60 mM sucrose, both of which induced the same osmotic pressure. The results are shown in Figure 3B. In our measurements, 60 mM sucrose induced a repellent-like response, which is consistent with previous work (Vaknin and Berg, 2006), whereas 30 mM KCl induced an attractant response. Thus, the chemotactic response of E. coli to KCl did not result from osmotaxis. The quantitative comparison of the three types of chemicals is shown in Figure 3C. The response to 30 mM KCl was 1.79 ± 0.10 times as large as that to 100 μM MeAsp, while the response to 60 mM sucrose was −0.30 ± 0.05 times as large as that to 100 μM MeAsp.

Quantitative characterization of the chemotactic response to potassium

To quantitively describe the response of receptor-kinase activity to potassium ions, we measured the dose–response curve of HCB1288-pVS88 to potassium chloride. As shown in Figure 4A, different concentrations of KCl were added and then removed. The FRET value of the immediate response after adding each concentration of stimulus was recorded. The FRET values were normalized by the pre-stimulus FRET value. The relative kinase activity was obtained by rescaling the FRET values of 1 (the pre-stimulus value) to 0.94 (the value after adding a saturated concentration of stimulus) to the range between 1 and 0, then the relation between relative kinase activity and concentrations of KCl was obtained (Figure 4B).

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Quantitative results of the chemotactic response of the wild-type strain (HCB1288-pVS88) to potassium.

(A) A typical example of the dose–response measurement. The blue solid line denotes the original signal, and the red dots represent the pH-corrected signal, recalculated from the pH-corrected cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) and yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) signals using the response of the no-receptor strain. The vertical purple (green) dashed lines indicate the moment of adding (removing) stimulus. (B) The dose–response curve of relative kinase activity to KCl. The blue dots and gray circles represent the pH-corrected and original experimental data, respectively. The red solid and gray dashed lines are the fit curves for the blue dots and gray circles, respectively, using a Hill function. The fitted Hill coefficient for original and pH-corrected response were 0.53 ± 0.04 and 0.88 ± 0.14, respectively, and the concentration for half-maximal response (K_0.5) were 0.64 ± 0.12 and 0.33 ± 0.06 mM, accordingly. (C) Definition of adaptation time in the step response. The gray and blue lines represent the original and pH-corrected signals, respectively. (D) The adaptation level $P = (R^{*} - R_{L}) / (1 - R_{L})$ and adaptation time (T) as a function of the concentration of KCl, calculated with pH-corrected data. The errors denote standard error of the mean (SEM).

As shown in Figure 4B, the gray circles represent experimental data for potassium. We fitted them with a Hill function (gray dashed line). The fitted Hill coefficient was 0.53 ± 0.04. However, this value was revised to 0.88 ± 0.14 when we corrected the FRET responses for the pH effects on the brightness of eCFP and eYFP (the blue dots and red solid line). The concentration for half-maximal response (K_0.5) was 0.64 ± 0.12 mM before correction and 0.33 ± 0.06 mM after correction. To study the adaptation kinetics, we measured the step response for different concentrations of potassium. As shown in Figure 4C, we calculated the adaptation percentage $P = (R^{*} - R_{L}) / (1 - R_{L})$ and adaptation time T, where R* and R_L are the adapted value and the lowest value of the FRET signal after stepwise addition of potassium, respectively. The adaptation percentage (P) and the adaptation time (T) for different concentrations of potassium are shown in Figure 4D.

According to our measurements, E. coli responds sensitively (with a small K_0.5) and adapts quickly to potassium chloride in a range of 0.01–100 mM. The recovery of the chemotactic response was imprecise for all concentrations of potassium ions.

The chemotactic response to potassium may result from the intracellular pH increase

We showed that the attractant-like response of the chemotactic signal to potassium does not result from osmotaxis. Moreover, the PMF or motor speed did not change during that process. Considering that the absolute value of the transmembrane potential deceases as the concentration of extracellular potassium ions increases, the intracellular pH will increase to maintain a constant PMF. To confirm this, we monitored the intracellular pH using the pH-sensitive fluorescent protein pHlourin2, by computing the ratio of emitted fluorescence intensities with 405 and 488 nm excitations (the ratio increases with pH value) (Mahon, 2011). The results are shown in Figure 5A. The intracellular pH of the wild-type strain (HCB33-pTrc99a_pHlourin2) increases immediately upon addition of 30 mM KCl. The purple arrows denote the moment of adding stimulus, while green arrows denote the moment of removing stimulus. As a control, 20 mM sodium benzoate with pH = 4.55 was added at t = 720 s to decrease the intracellular pH to 4.55 (Nakamura et al., 2009).

Figure 5 with 3 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

The response of intracellular pH for the wild-type strain and the chemotactic response of different mutant strains to potassium.

(A) The response of intracellular pH to 30 mM KCl for the wild-type strain (HCB33-pTrc99a_pHluorin2). The response to 20 mM sodium benzoate solution with pH = 4.55 was used as a control. (B) The chemotactic response of the Tsr-only strain (HCB1414-pPA114-pVS88) to four typical concentrations of potassium. The blue line denotes the orignal signal, and the red dots represent the pH-correcting signal. (C) The chemotactic response of the Tar-only strain (HCB1414-pLC113-pVS88) to four typical concentrations of potassium. The blue line denotes the orignal signal, and the red dots represent the pH-correcting signal. (D) The chemotactic response of the no-receptor strain (HCB1414-pVS88) to 30 mM KCl. The vertical purple (green) arrows denote the moment of adding (removing) stimulus.

It was reported that Tar and Tsr mediate opposite responses to the changes in intracellular pH (Krikos et al., 1985; Umemura et al., 2002). Therefore, we measured the chemotactic response of strains expressing only the Tar or Tsr receptor via the FRET assay. As shown in Figure 5B, four different concentrations of KCl were added and removed successively, and the kinases activity of the Tsr-only strain exhibited an attractant response. Its imprecise adaptation is apparent as the potassium concentration increases. In contrast, the Tar-only strain exhibited a biphasic response, with kinase activity increasing sharply and then decreasing rapidly below the pre-stimulus level upon addition of potassium (Figure 5C). Such a biphasic response was also observed in the response of the Tar-only strain to 40 mM sodium benzoate at pH of 7.0 (Figure 5—figure supplement 1). Note that the cytoplasmic pH deceases upon addition of sodium benzoate at pH of 7.0, so that the response to addition of sodium benzoate is opposite to the response to addition of potassium for the Tar-only strain. Therefore, the different responses of the Tar- and Tsr-only strains to potassium were consistent with the responses to the increase in intracellular pH.

We noted that both major receptors exhibited imprecise adaptation to stepwise addition of potassium. To investigate whether this was due to chemotactic sensing, we monitored the response of the strain with no chemoreceptors to stepwise addition of potassium. Upon addition of potassium, the FRET value decreased and remained at a constant value similar to the adapted level for the strains with chemoreceptors (Figure 5D). This indicated that the imprecise adaptation seen for the wild-type, Tar-only, and Tsr-only strains was not due to chemosensing. As the solution pH affects the brightness of fluorescent proteins, we hypothesize that this apparent imprecise adaptation was due to the differential change in eCFP and eYFP brightness when the cytoplasmic pH changed. To test this hypothesis, we bleached the eYFPs of the no-receptor strain (HCB1414-pVS88), eliminating possible FRET between CheY-eYFP and CheZ-eCFP, and compared the response of CFP fluorescence intensity to 30 mM KCl before and after bleaching. As shown in Figure 5—figure supplement 2A, the CFP intensity showed similar amount of increase upon addition of KCl (i.e., increase of cytoplasmic pH) before and after YFP bleaching. Thus, such a response did not result from FRET, but from changes in fluorescence intensity due to an increase in intracellular pH. We calculated the ratio of CFP fluorescence intensity P = F_r/F_b = 1.056 without FRET, where F_r and F_b were the CFP intensity for cells in 30 mM KCl and motility medium, respectively. From this ratio, we could calculate the theoretical enhancement in CFP intensity due to pH increase for the wild-type strain (HCB1288-pVS88) after adding 30 mM KCl (red dashed line in Figure 5—figure supplement 2B), which we found was similar to the adapted level of the CFP signal. This further proved that the apparent imprecise adaptation in the FRET signal was due to changes in eCFP and eYFP brightness when the cytoplasmic pH changed.

Revised FRET responses by correcting the pH effects on the brightness of eCFP and eYFP

To minimize the impact of pH changes altering the fluorescent protein brightness on FRET measurements of chemotactic response and adaptation to potassium, we measured the full potassium response curve for the no-receptor mutant (HCB1414-pVS88), as shown in Figure 5—figure supplement 3. We characterized the pH effects on CFP and YFP channels at different concentrations of KCl, and the relationship between the ratio of the signal post- to pre-KCl addition and the KCl concentration was established for both channels, as shown in Figure 5—figure supplement 3C. The pH-corrected signal after KCl addition for strains with receptors was obtained by dividing the original signal after KCl addition by this ratio at the specific KCl concentration. This procedure was applied to both CFP and YFP channels. The pH-corrected responses for the Tar- and Tsr-only strains are represented by red dots in Figure 5BC.

We recalculated the FRET responses to stepwise addition of KCl, with an example depicted by the red dots in Figure 3A. The corrected response magnitude to 30 mM KCl is similar to that of 100 μM MeAsp, being 1.06 ± 0.10 times as large, as shown by the red bar in Figure 3C. We also calculated the dose–response curve and the adaptation curve from the pH-corrected signals, as shown in Figure 4. The FRET signal also exhibits over-adaptation, similar to the bead assay, when we recalculated the response by correcting the CFP and YFP channels. The fitted Hill coefficient for the dose–response curve is 0.88 ± 0.14 (mean ± standard deviation [SD]), which is close to the response to MeAsp (~1.2) (Sourjik and Berg, 2002b), and the concentration for half-maximal response (K_0.5) was 0.33 ± 0.06 mM (mean ± SD).

Our results indicated that the increase in the extracellular concentration of potassium leads to an increase in the intracellular pH. The Tar and Tsr receptors respond to the increase in intracellular pH differently. The wild-type strain exhibits a similar response to the Tsr-only strain due to the larger amount of Tsr than Tar receptors. These responses could be adapted via methylation and demethylation of receptors.

The chemotaxis-based simulation of E. coli attraction by the potassium signal produced by a biofilm

Based on the mechanism of potassium sensing we established here, we sought to simulate the chemotactic swimming of E. coli cells in response to a periodic potassium signal secreted from a typical biofilm (Humphries et al., 2017).

To simulate the periodically fluctuating field of potassium concentration produced by the biofilm, an oscillating source was introduced using a cosine function $L_{s} = L_{0} (1 - \cos (2 π t / T))$ at position x = 0, where $L_{0}$ is the half maximum concentration of potassium, and $T$ denotes the period of oscillation. In a semi-infinite liquid environment, this source results in an oscillating spatiotemporal profile of potassium

L (x, t) = L_{0} [1 - \cos (\frac{2 π t}{T} - \sqrt{\frac{π}{D T}} x) \exp (- \sqrt{\frac{π}{D T}} x)],

where $D = 1333.3 {μ m}^{2} / s$ is the diffusion constant of potassium in water (Fell and Hutchison, 1971). The profile is shown in Figure 6A (see Appendix 1 for the detailed derivation).

Figure 6 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Simulation of *E. coli* chemotactic swimming in response to a periodic potassium signal produced by a typical biofilm.

(A) The oscillating spatial gradient of potassium. (B) The dose–response curve of receptor-kinase activity to potassium. Blue dots are pH-corrected experimental data (blue dots in Figure 4B). Red solid line is the fitting curve with Equation 2. (C) Typical traces of simulated mean positions with $L_{0}$ = 1.0 mM and T = 2 hr. The blue and green lines denote the mean x-position ( $1500 - 〈x〉$ ) and mean y-position ( $〈y〉$ ), respectively. The purple dashed line indicates the oscillating potassium source at x = 0. The phase delay $∆ ϕ$ is defined as the phase shift between the trough of the mean x-position and the trough of potassium source except for t/T = 0. (D) The comparison of the mean x-position under different periods of the driving source: T = 1, 2, 3, and 4 hr. The purple dashed line indicates the oscillating potassium source at x = 0. (E) The relation between the phase delay $∆ ϕ$ and the driving period T. Each data was calculated by the average of 10 simulations. The error denotes standard deviation. (F) The relation between lag time ( $∆ ϕ ∙ T$ ) and the driving period T. The error denotes standard deviation.

Similar to the two-state model of pH taxis of E. coli (Hu and Tu, 2013; Hu and Tu, 2014), we employed a coarse-grained model of the chemotaxis signaling pathway to simulate the chemotactic motion of E. coli in the potassium profile (see Materials and methods for details) (Liu et al., 2022; Tian et al., 2021). We utilized the Monod–Wyman–Changeux allosteric model (Monod et al., 1965) to describe the potassium sensing by chemoreceptors (Tu et al., 2008):

a = \frac{1}{1 + \exp [N (f_{m} (m) + f_{L} (L))]},

where a is the kinase activity of the cluster of chemoreceptors, m is the methylation level of receptors, L denotes the concentration of extracellular potassium, N is the number of receptor homodimers in an allosteric cluster, and f_m and f_L represent the methylation- and ligand-dependent free energy, respectively.

f_{L} (L) = \ln \frac{1 + L / K_{o f f}}{1 + L / K_{o n}},

f_{m} (m) = α (m - m_{0}),

where K_off and K_on are the ligand dissociation constants for inactive and active receptors, respectively, α is the free energy change per added methyl group, and m₀ is the methylation level where f_m crosses zero. As shown in Figure 6B, the dose–response of kinase activity to potassium could be well fitted by Equation 2 to extract the parameters.

In our simulation, cells swim in a square space with dimensions of $0 \leq x \leq 1500 μ m$ and $0 \leq y \leq 1500 μ m$ with a constant speed of 25 μm/s. Ten thousand cells were uniformly distributed in the space at $t = 0$ . Each simulation was performed for at least four periods. An example of the traces of the mean positions in the x-direction (blue solid line) and y-direction (green solid line) is shown in Figure 6C. The cells effectively tracked the potassium gradient and their positions exhibited fluctuations in the direction of the gradient, similar to that observed experimentally by Humphries et al., 2017. Furthermore, a phase delay between the mean x-position and the potassium source was observed, indicating a temporal shift in response.

We simulated the taxis of cells under the oscillating source with $L_{0} = 1 m M$ and T = 1, 2, 3, and 4 hr. Four typical traces are shown in Figure 6D, and the relation between the phase shift ( $Δ ϕ$ , as denoted in Figure 6C) and the driving period (T) is shown in Figure 6E. We found that the phase delay decreases significantly with the increase of driving period, a trend that is consistent with previous experimental observations in the biofilm (Humphries et al., 2017). Similar behavior was observed in frequency-dependent E. coli chemotaxis to spatially and temporally varying MeAsp source (Zhu et al., 2012). Furthermore, we also computed the lag time ( $Δ ϕ ∙ T$ ) of the average x-position relative to the electric signal (potassium concentration). The relation between lag time and the driving period is shown in Figure 6F. For driving periods of 1, 2, 3, and 4 hr, the oscillation in the E. coli cell displacement lagged the potassium source by 11.7 ± 0.5, 14.7 ± 0.7, 14.8 ± 0.9, and 14.2 ± 1.0 min (mean ± SD), respectively. These values closely resemble the 9–35 min lag observed in biofilm experiments for B. subtilis and P. aeruginosa (Humphries et al., 2017). Notably, this result was not affected by the specific value of L₀ (Figure 6—figure supplement 1).

Discussion

Potassium ions play a critical role in many physiological processes of bacteria. Bacteria in biofilms release potassium ions to their surroundings through ion channels on the cell membrane, thus influencing the behavior of surrounding bacteria and attracting distant free bacteria to swim toward them. However, the mechanism of bacterial sensing and response to potassium ions was unclear. Here, we found that E. coli senses the concentration change of extracellular potassium ions sensitively via the chemotaxis signaling pathway, and this chemotactic sensing is achieved through changes in intracellular pH.

We found that E. coli could quickly converge to the area with a higher concentration of potassium under a linear concentration profile. The measurements of the response of individual motors to stepwise addition and removal of 30 mM KCl via the bead assay demonstrated that the attractant response resulted from the chemotaxis signaling pathway instead of the possible PMF effect on the motor itself. We also demonstrated that the PMF remained unchanged when KCl was added or removed.

To directly measure the chemotactic response of E. coli to potassium ions, we measured the response to different concentrations of potassium via FRET between CheY-eYFP and CheZ-eCFP. After correcting the pH effects on the brightness of CFP and YFP proteins, we found that the chemotactic response of wild-type E. coli to 30 mM KCl was 1.06±0.10 times that to 100 μM MeAsp. The response to 60 mM sucrose was −0.30 ± 0.05 times that to 100 μM MeAsp. This suggested that the attractant response to potassium was independent of the osmolality response. To quantitatively describe the chemotactic response to potassium, we systematically measured the dose–response curve and the step responses. We obtained a Hill coefficient of 0.88 ± 0.14 and a concentration of 0.33 ± 0.06 mM for the half-maximal response. This showed that E. coli had a very sensitive response to potassium ions and could sense weak changes in potassium concentration. We also found that E. coli adapts quickly to potassium concentration changes in the range of 0.01–100 mM, which promotes cell localization to the peak of a potassium concentration profile.

For other strong attractant stimuli such as high concentrations of MeAsp, the step response typically shows a low plateau before it adapts. However, in the case of potassium, the FRET signal does not typically display an obvious plateau following the stimuli. To observe the low plateau before adaptation, a saturating amount of attractant should be added in a stepwise manner. According to the dose–response curve we measured for potassium, a saturating amount of potassium would be close to 100 mM. In fact, there is a small segment of the low plateau in the step response to 30 mM KCl (Figure 4C). To observe more of this low plateau, we could have used a higher concentration of KCl. However, a stimulation higher than 30 mM KCl will induce substantial physiological changes in the cell, resulting in a significant decrease in fluorescence for both channels (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). Therefore, the range of KCl concentration that can be reliably applied in FRET measurements is limited.

While keeping the PMF unchanged, addition of potassium decreases the membrane potential and thus increases the intracellular pH. This was demonstrated by intracellular pH measurements. We also measured the chemotactic response of mutant strains expressing only Tsr or Tar to different concentrations of potassium. The Tsr-only strain responded to potassium as an attractant, whereas the Tar-only strain exhibited a biphasic response (a repellent-like followed by an attractant-like response). The different responses of Tar and Tsr to potassium were consist with their responses to changes in intracellular pH. We further demonstrated the biphasic response of the Tar-only strain to 40 mM sodium benzoate with pH of 7.0 that induced a decrease in intracellular pH. The differential responses of the Tsr and Tar receptors to potassium may be a strategy by which bacteria adjust their response to potassium at different growth stages during which bacteria express different ratios of Tsr to Tar receptors (Kalinin et al., 2010; Yang and Sourjik, 2012). For the growth stage used in our measurements here, the amount of Tsr was more than that of Tar in the wild-type strain (Li and Hazelbauer, 2004), so the response to potassium was dominated by Tsr.

The response of the Tar-only strain to potassium warrants further discussion (Figure 5C). This strain shows a repellent response to stepwise addition of low concentrations of potassium, specifically less than 10 mM. This is consistent with previous observations of the response of Tar to changes in intracellular pH (Krikos et al., 1985; Umemura et al., 2002). Interestingly, it exhibits a biphasic response to high potassium concentrations of 10 mM and above. This biphasic response might result from additional pH effects on the activity of intracellular enzymes such as CheRB and CheA (Conley et al., 1994), which may have a different timescale and response from the Tar receptor.

Based on the potassium sensing mechanism we established here, we performed stochastic simulation of bacterial taxis in a biofilm-produced potassium gradient, demonstrating that E. coli cells can be periodically attracted by the biofilm. Moreover, we observed a time delay between the positions of the cells and the electric signal of the biofilm. Specifically, we found that the oscillation of E. coli cell displacement lags the potassium source by 11.7 ± 0.5, 14.7 ± 0.7, 14.8 ± 0.9, and 14.2 ± 1.0 min (mean ± SD) for driving periods of 1, 2, 3, and 4 hr, respectively. Remarkably, these values closely resemble the 9–35 min lag observed in biofilm experiments for B. subtilis and P. aeruginosa (Humphries et al., 2017), despite the potential variations in the potassium sensing mechanisms among these bacterial species. The potassium sensing mechanism we established here contributed to our understanding of the complex dynamics of electrical signaling in biofilm environments.

Materials and methods

Key resources table

Reagent type (species) or resource	Designation	Source or reference	Identifiers	Additional information
Strain, strain background (Escherichia coli)	Wild-type AW405	Howard Berg Lab Armstrong et al., 1967	HCB1	Also known as AW405
Strain, strain background (Escherichia coli)	Wild-type RP437	Howard Berg Lab Parkinson, 1978	HCB33	Also known as RP437
Strain, strain background (Escherichia coli)	CheY** strain	Howard Berg Lab	HCB901	ΔcheZ fliC, Ptrc420 cheY^13DK106YW
Strain, strain background (Escherichia coli)	RP437 with ΔcheY cheZ	Howard Berg Lab Sourjik and Berg, 2002b	HCB1288	Also known as VS104; ΔcheY cheZ
Strain, strain background (Escherichia coli)	RP437 with Δtar tsr tap trg aer cheY cheZ	Howard Berg Lab Sourjik and Berg, 2002a	HCB1414	Also known as VS181; Δtar tsr tap trg aer cheY cheZ
Strain, strain background (Escherichia coli)	RP437 with ΔfliC	This paper	JY26	The fliC gene of strain RP437 was deleted; ΔfliC
Recombinant DNA reagent	pVS18 (plasmid)	Howard Berg Lab Sourjik and Berg, 2002a	pVS18	CheY-eYFP
Recombinant DNA reagent	pVS88 (plasmid)	Howard Berg Lab Sourjik and Berg, 2004	pVS88	CheY-eYFP and CheZ-eCFP
Recombinant DNA reagent	pBES38 (plasmid)	Howard Berg Lab	pBES38	LacI^q and FliC^sticky
Recombinant DNA reagent	pKAF131 (plasmid)	Howard Berg Lab Yuan et al., 2010	pKAF131	FliC^sticky
Recombinant DNA reagent	pLC113 (plasmid)	Howard Berg Lab Ames et al., 2002	pLC113	Tar
Recombinant DNA reagent	pPA114 (plasmid)	Howard Berg Lab Ames et al., 2002	pPA114	Tsr
Recombinant DNA reagent	pTrc99a_pHluorin2 (plasmid)	This paper	pTrc99a_pHluorin2	The gene pHluorin2 was cloned into pTrc99a under an IPTG-inducible promoter.
Chemical compound, drug	Tryptone	Oxoid	CAT# LP0042B
Chemical compound, drug	IPTG	Sigma-Aldrich	CAT# I6758
Chemical compound, drug	Lactic acid	Sigma-Aldrich	CAT# 252476
Software, algorithm	Custom script	Zhang, 2024	https://github.com/CZhang2023/2024_eLife_potassium

Strains and plasmids

Request a detailed protocol

Strain HCB1 was derived from E. coli K12 strain AW405 (Armstrong et al., 1967). Strains JY26 (ΔfliC), HCB33, HCB901 (ΔcheZ fliC, Ptrc420 cheY^13DK106YW) (Scharf et al., 1998), HCB1288 (ΔcheY cheZ) (Sourjik and Berg, 2002b), and HCB1414 (Δtar tsr tap trg aer cheY cheZ) (Sourjik and Berg, 2002a) were derived from E. coli K12 strain RP437 (Parkinson, 1978). The plasmid pKAF131 constitutively expresses FliC^sticky (Yuan et al., 2010). The plasmid pBES38 constitutively expresses both LacI^q and the sticky filament FliC^sticky (Scharf et al., 1998). The promoters used for the constitutive expression of LacI^q and FliC^sticky were the I^q promotor and the native promoter of fliC, respectively (Scharf et al., 1998). The FRET pair CheY-eYFP and CheZ-eCFP was expressed from plasmid pVS88 under an isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactoside (IPTG)-inducible promoter (Sourjik and Berg, 2004). The plasmid pVS18 was used to express CheY-eYFP under an IPTG-inducible promoter (Sourjik and Berg, 2002a). The plasmids pLC113 and pPA114 were used to express Tar and Tsr receptors under a salicylate-inducible promoter, respectively (Ames et al., 2002). The gene pHluorin2 was cloned into pTrc99a under an IPTG-inducible promoter, yielding pTrc99a_pHluorin2. The strains and plasmids used in this study are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Strains and plasmids used in this study.

Strain	Plasmids	Assay
HCB1	-	Microfluidic assay
JY26	pKAF131	Bead assay
HCB901	pBES38	Bead assay
HCB1288	pVS88	FRET assay
HCB1288	pVS18	FRET assay
HCB1414	pVS88	FRET assay
	pLC113, pVS88	FRET assay
	pPA114, pVS88	FRET assay
HCB33	pTrc99a_pHluorin2	Intracellular pH measurement

Cell culture

Request a detailed protocol

All cells were grown at 33°C in 10 ml T-broth (1% tryptone and 0.5% NaCl) to an OD₆₀₀ between 0.45 and 0.50 with appropriate antibiotics and inducers, collected by centrifugation and washed twice with potassium-depleted motility buffer (10 mM NaPO₄, 0.1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 1 mM methionine, 10 mM lactic acid, pH 7.0). Cells of HCB1 were centrifuged for 6 min at 1200 × g. Cells of JY26-pKAF131 were grown with 25 μg/ml chloramphenicol. HCB901-pBES38 cells were grown with 100 μg/ml ampicillin and 23 μM IPTG. Both were centrifuged for 2 min at 4000 × g. Cells of HCB1288-pVS88 and HCB1414-pVS88 were grown with 100 μg/ml ampicillin and 100 μM IPTG in the dark. Cells of HCB1414-pLC113-pVS88 and HCB1414-pPA114-pVS88 were grown with 100 μg/ml ampicillin, 25 μg/ml chloramphenicol, 100 μM IPTG, and 1 μM salicylate in the dark. Cells of HCB33-pTrc99a_pHlourin2 were grown with 100 μg/ml ampicillin and 100 μM IPTG. Cells were stored at 4°C before use. All experiments were carried out at 23°C. The KCl solution used in this work was prepared in the potassium-depleted motility buffer.

Microfluidics

Request a detailed protocol

We constructed a 100-μm-depth microfluidic device similar to that described previously (Liu et al., 2022; Tian et al., 2021). The design is shown in Figure 1A. There are two auxiliary channels and three primary channels. The width of the auxiliary channels is 100 μm, while the width of the primary channels is 400 μm. The source and sink channels were used to flow 100 mM KCl and potassium-depleted motility buffer, respectively, and the observing channel was used to observe the motion of cells. The auxiliary channels were filled with 2% agarose gel at a temperature of 68°C and cooled down. In our measurement, we kept the flow at a rate of 5 ml/min in both source and sink channels with a syringe pump (Pump-22; Harvard Apparatus). The potassium ions could diffuse from the source channel to the sink channel and form a linear gradient in the observing channel. Cells of HCB1 were sealed in the observing channel, and their movement was recorded by a fast CMOS camera (Flare 2M360-CL, IO Industries) equipped on a Nikon Ti-E microscope at a magnification of ×20. The chemotaxis migration coefficient, as an indicator of the mean cell position (Kalinin et al., 2010), was calculated as the average of (x_i − x_c)/194, where x_i is the x-position of the ith cell, x_c is the x-position of the center of the observing channel, and 194 μm is the half-width of the observed region.

Bead assay

Request a detailed protocol

We sheared the sticky filaments of the washed cell suspensions by passing them 200 times between two syringes equipped with 23-gauge needles and connected by a 7-cm-long polyethylene tube (0.58 mm inside diameter, no. 0427411; Becton Dickinson), and condensed them into 300 μl in potassium-depleted motility buffer. To measure motor rotation, sheared cells were immobilized on a coverslip coated with poly-L-lysine (0.01%, P4707; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) assembled on a flow chamber (Berg and Block, 1984), and allowed to stand for 5 min. Then, 1-μm-diameter polystyrene beads (0.27%, no. 0731; Polysciences) were flowed to replace the suspension and attached to the sheared filament stubs by allowing it to stand for 4 min. The rotation of beads was recorded by a fast CMOS camera (Flare 2M360-CL, IO Industries) equipped on a Nikon Ti-E inverted phase-contrast microscope at a magnification of ×40. The CW bias and rotational speed were calculated with a 20-s time window and 1-s time slide.

FRET assay

Request a detailed protocol

The experimental setup used in FRET measurements was the same as that described previously (Zhang et al., 2018). The FRET setup was based on a Nikon Ti-E microscope equipped with a 40× 0.60 NA objective. The illumination light was provided by a 130-W mercury lamp, attenuated by a factor of 1024 with neutral density filters, and passed through an excitation bandpass filter (FF02-438/24-25, Semrock) and a dichroic mirror (FF458-Di02−25x36, Semrock). The epifluorescent emission was split into cyan and yellow channels by a second dichroic mirror (FF509-FDi01−25x36, Semrock). The signals in the two channels were then filtered by two emission bandpass filters (FF01-483/32-25 and FF01-542/32-25, Semrock) and collected by two photon-counting photomultipliers (H7421-40, Hamamatsu, Hamamatsu City, Japan), respectively. Signals from the two photomultipliers were recorded at a sampling rate of 1 Hz using a data-acquisition card installed in a computer (USB-1901(G)–1020, ADlink, New Taipei, Taiwan).

The washed cell suspension was concentrated 45 times and flowed into a flow chamber equipped with a poly-L-lysine-coated coverslip, allowing it to stand for 20 min. Then, the chamber was maintained under a constant flow (500 $μ l / m i n$ ) of potassium-depleted motility buffer by a syringe pump (Pump-22; Harvard Apparatus). The same flow was used to add and remove stimulus. All data analysis was performed using custom scripts in MATLAB 2018b (MathWorks). The FRET value was calculated as the ratio of YFP to CFP intensities, normalized by the pre-stimulus value. The impact of pH on the original signals for both CFP and YFP channels was corrected by

S_{p H - c o r r e c t e d} (L; t_{a d d i t i o n} < t < t_{r e m o v a l}) = \frac{S_{o r i g n a l} (L; t_{a d d i t i o n} < t < t_{r e m o v a l})}{C_{p H} (L)}

where $S_{p H - c o r r e c t e d} (L; t_{a d d i t i o n} < t < t_{r e m o v a l})$ and $S_{o r i g n a l} (L; t_{a d d i t i o n} < t < t_{r e m o v a l})$ represent the pH-corrected and original PMT signal (CFP or YFP channel) from the moment of addition of L mM KCl to the moment of its removal, respectively, and $C_{p H} (L)$ is the correction factor, which is the ratio of PMT signal post- to pre-KCl addition for the no-receptor mutant at L mM KCl, for CFP or YFP channel as shown Figure 5—figure supplement 3. The pH-corrected FRET response is then calculated as the ratio of the pH-corrected YFP to the pH-corrected CFP, normalized by the pre-stimulus ratio.

For the YFP photobleaching assay, we measured the background of the CFP channel by recording the intensity of the CFP channel for the strain expressing only CheY-eYFP (HCB1288-pVS18). We monitored the response of the CFP signal to 30 mM KCl before and after bleaching YFP. The bleaching was carried out with a YFP filter set (C-FL YFP BP HYQ535, #41028, Chroma) under mercury lamp illumination without attenuation and sustained for 50 min. All these measurements were performed under the same conditions.

Intracellular pH measurements

Request a detailed protocol

The washed cells of HCB33-pTrc99a_pHluorin2 were immobilized on a coverslip assembled on a flow chamber and coated with poly-L-lysine. Then, a constant flow (500 $μ l / m i n$ ) was applied to the cells. The samples were illuminated periodically with two lasers. In each period, the laser with a wavelength of 405 nm was illuminated for 200 ms and stopped for 400 ms, and the laser with a wavelength of 488 nm was illuminated for another 200 ms and stopped for another 400 ms. The emission light passed through the T495lp dichroic mirror and AT495lp longpass filter and was collected by an EMCCD (Andor DU897) equipped on a Nikon Ti-E inverted phase-contrast microscope at a magnification of ×100. The changes in intracellular pH could be characterized by the ratio of emitted fluorescence between the two excitation lasers.

Simulation of bacterial taxis in an oscillating spatial gradient of potassium

Request a detailed protocol

In our simulation, cells were treated as self-propelled particles. They could swim smoothly (a run state) with a constant speed of 25 μm/s and with rotational diffusion (the rotational diffusion constant was 0.062 rad²/s) (Vladimirov et al., 2010), or stop to reorient (a tumble state). The tumble angle $θ$ was selected from the probability distribution $P (θ) = 0.5 * (1 + c o s θ) * \sin θ (0 \leq θ \leq π)$ (Berg and Brown, 1972; Neumann et al., 2010). A coarse-grained model of the chemotaxis signaling pathway (Jiang et al., 2010; Tu et al., 2008) was utilized to describe the sensing and adaptation of chemoreceptors to changes in extracellular potassium concentration:

a = \frac{1}{1 + \exp [N (α (m - m_{0}) + \ln \frac{1 + L / K_{o f f}}{1 + L / K_{o n}})]},

\frac{d m}{d t} = k_{R} (1 - a) - k_{B} a,

where $a$ is the kinase activity of the cluster of chemoreceptors, $m$ is the methylation level of receptors, and $L$ denotes the concentration of extracellular potassium. In the denominator on the right-hand side of Equation 3, the two terms within the parentheses of the exponential expression represent the methylation-dependent (f_m) and ligand-dependent (f_L) free energy, respectively. The parameters $N = 0.85, f_{m} = 0.84, K_{o f f} = 0.17 m M, K_{o n} = 55.17 m M$ were determined by fitting the dose–response curve in Figure 6B. The values of the parameters $α = - 1.7, m_{0} = 1.0, k_{R} = 0.005 s^{- 1}, k_{B} = 0.010 s^{- 1}$ were chosen to be the same as before (Liu et al., 2022).

The CheY-P concentration (Yp) is proportional to the kinase activity: $Y p = 7.86 a$ (Jiang et al., 2010; van Albada and Ten Wolde, 2009), and is related to the motor CW bias (B) by (Cluzel et al., 2000):

B = \frac{Y p^{10.3}}{Y p^{10.3} + {3.1}^{10.3}}

Then the switching rate from run to tumble and from tumble to run were determined by $B / 0.11$ and $5 s^{- 1}$ , respectively (Berg and Brown, 1972; He et al., 2016).

In the simulation, cells swim in a square space with dimensions of $0 \leq x \leq 1500 μ m$ and $0 \leq y \leq 1500 μ m$ . We implemented periodic boundary condition for the y-direction, and reflective boundaries for the x-direction. Ten thousand cells were uniformly distributed throughout the square space at $t = 0$ . The time step is 0.01 s. They swam in a steady oscillating spatial gradient of potassium created by an oscillating source at x = 0. The simulation was performed for a minimum of four periods to observe and analyze the long-term behavior of the cells in response to the oscillating gradient. The simulated lag time decreases with the methylation rate k_R, but levels off at high values of k_R (Figure 6—figure supplement 2).

Appendix 1

The diffusion of potassium in semi-infinite liquid with a periodic source at x = 0

It has been found that the biofilm could lead to a periodically oscillated source of potassium. Here, we simplified this source as a concentration signal of a cosine function at x = 0. Then the potassium will diffuse in the region of x > 0 which could be described by

\frac{\partial C}{\partial t} = D \frac{\partial^{2} C}{\partial x^{2}}, f o r x > 0

with

C (x, t = 0) = 0, C (x = 0, t) = ϕ (t),

where $C$ is the concentration of potassium, $D$ is the diffusion constant of potassium in water, $L_{0}$ is the half maximum concentration of potassium, $T$ denotes the period of oscillation, and $ϕ (t) = L_{0} (1 - \cos (2 π t / T))$ .

The solution can be given by (Carslaw and Jaeger, 1947):

C (x, t) = \int_{0}^{t} ϕ (λ) \frac{\partial F (x, t - λ)}{\partial t} d λ,

where

F (x, t - λ) = \frac{2}{\sqrt{π}} \int_{\frac{x}{2 \sqrt{D (t - λ)}}}^{\infty} e^{- ξ^{2}} d ξ

Thus

C (x, t) = \frac{2}{\sqrt{π}} \int_{\frac{x}{2 \sqrt{D t}}}^{\infty} ϕ (t - \frac{x^{2}}{4 D μ^{2}}) e^{- μ^{2}} d μ

where

μ = \frac{x}{2 \sqrt{D (t - λ)}}

In this case

\begin{array}{ll} C (x, t) = & \frac{2}{\sqrt{π}} \int_{\frac{x}{2 \sqrt{D t}}}^{\infty} L_{0} (1 - \cos (\frac{2 π}{T} (t - \frac{x^{2}}{4 D μ^{2}}))) e^{- μ^{2}} d μ \\ = L_{0} [1 - e r f (\frac{x}{2 \sqrt{D t}}) - \frac{2}{\sqrt{π}} \int_{\frac{x}{2 \sqrt{D t}}}^{\infty} \cos (\frac{2 π}{T} (t - \frac{x^{2}}{4 D μ^{2}})) e^{- μ^{2}} d μ] \end{array}

Since by a known definite integral

\frac{2}{\sqrt{π}} \int_{0}^{\infty} \cos (\frac{2 π}{T} (t - \frac{x^{2}}{4 D μ^{2}})) e^{- μ^{2}} d μ = \cos (\frac{2 π}{T} t - \sqrt{\frac{π}{D T}} x) e^{- \sqrt{\frac{π}{D T}} x}

Then

\begin{array}{ll} C (x, t) = & L_{0} [1 - \cos (\frac{2 π t}{T} - \sqrt{\frac{π}{D T}} x) \exp (- \sqrt{\frac{π}{D T}} x)] \\ - L_{0} [e r f (\frac{x}{2 \sqrt{D t}}) + \frac{2}{\sqrt{π}} \int_{0}^{\frac{x}{2 \sqrt{D t}}} \cos (\frac{2 π}{T} (t - \frac{x^{2}}{4 D μ^{2}})) e^{- μ^{2}} d μ] \end{array}

The second term is a transient disturbance caused by starting the oscillations of source at t = 0, and it dies away as t increases. In the steady state, for a finite value of x,

C (x, t) = L_{0} [1 - \cos (\frac{2 π t}{T} - \sqrt{\frac{π}{D T}} x) \exp (- \sqrt{\frac{π}{D T}} x)] .

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Data analysis scripts were uploaded online (GitHub, copy archived at Zhang, 2024).

References

1. Ali MK
2. Li X
3. Tang Q
4. Liu X
5. Chen F
6. Xiao J
7. Ali M
8. Chou SH
9. He J
(2017) Regulation of inducible potassium transporter kdpfabc by the kdpd/kdpe two-component system in Mycobacterium smegmatis
Frontiers in Microbiology 8:570.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00570
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2002) Collaborative signaling by mixed chemoreceptor teams in Escherichia coli
PNAS 99:7060–7065.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.092071899
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1967) Nonchemotactic mutants of Escherichia coli
Journal of Bacteriology 93:390–398.
https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.93.1.390-398.1967
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Bakker EP
2. Mangerich WE
(1981) Interconversion of components of the bacterial proton motive force by electrogenic potassium transport
Journal of Bacteriology 147:820–826.
https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.147.3.820-826.1981
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Ballal A
2. Basu B
3. Apte SK
(2007) The Kdp-ATPase system and its regulation
Journal of Biosciences 32:559–568.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-007-0055-7
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Berg HC
2. Brown DA
(1972) Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking
Nature 239:500–504.
https://doi.org/10.1038/239500a0
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Berg HC
2. Block SM
(1984) A miniature flow cell designed for rapid exchange of media under high-power microscope objectives
Journal of General Microbiology 130:2915–2920.
https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-130-11-2915
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Brass JM
2. Manson MD
(1984) Reconstitution of maltose chemotaxis in Escherichia coli by addition of maltose-binding protein to calcium-treated cells of maltose regulon mutants
Journal of Bacteriology 157:881–890.
https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.157.3.881-890.1984
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1998) Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity
Nature 393:85–88.
https://doi.org/10.1038/30018
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Bren A
2. Eisenbach M
(2000) How signals are heard during bacterial chemotaxis: protein-protein interactions in sensory signal propagation
Journal of Bacteriology 182:6865–6873.
https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.182.24.6865-6873.2000
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Book
1. Carslaw H
2. Jaeger J
(1947)
Conduction of Heat in Solids

Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Google Scholar
(2000) An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells
Science 287:1652–1655.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5458.1652
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Conley MP
2. Berg HC
3. Tawa P
4. Stewart RC
5. Ellefson DD
6. Wolfe AJ
(1994) pH dependence of CheA autophosphorylation in Escherichia coli
Journal of Bacteriology 176:3870–3877.
https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.176.13.3870-3877.1994
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. de Pina K
2. Navarro C
3. McWalter L
4. Boxer DH
5. Price NC
6. Kelly SM
7. Mandrand-Berthelot MA
8. Wu LF
(1995) Purification and characterization of the periplasmic nickel-binding protein NikA of Escherichia coli K12
European Journal of Biochemistry 227:857–865.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.tb20211.x
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Djordjevic S
2. Stock AM
(1997) Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine
Structure 5:545–558.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-2126(97)00210-4
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Djordjevic S
2. Stock AM
(1998) Chemotaxis receptor recognition by protein methyltransferase CheR
Nature Structural Biology 5:446–450.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nsb0698-446
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Dyer CM
2. Dahlquist FW
(2006) Switched or not?: the structure of unphosphorylated CheY bound to the N terminus of FliM
Journal of Bacteriology 188:7354–7363.
https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00637-06
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Endres RG
2. Oleksiuk O
3. Hansen CH
4. Meir Y
5. Sourjik V
6. Wingreen NS
(2008) Variable sizes of Escherichia coli chemoreceptor signaling teams
Molecular Systems Biology 4:211.
https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2008.49
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2010) Repellent taxis in response to nickel ion requires neither Ni2+ transport nor the periplasmic NikA binding protein
Journal of Bacteriology 192:2633–2637.
https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00854-09
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Epstein W
(2003) The roles and regulation of potassium in bacteria
Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology 75:293–320.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6603(03)75008-9
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Fell CJD
2. Hutchison HP
(1971) Diffusion coefficients for sodium and potassium chlorides in water at elevated temperatures
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data 16:427–429.
https://doi.org/10.1021/je60051a005
- Google Scholar
1. Gabel CV
2. Berg HC
(2003) The speed of the flagellar rotary motor of Escherichia coli varies linearly with protonmotive force
PNAS 100:8748–8751.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1533395100
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Gründling A
(2013) Potassium uptake systems in Staphylococcus aureus: new stories about ancient systems
mBio 4:e00784.
https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00784-13
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. He R
2. Zhang R
3. Yuan J
(2016) Noise-induced increase of sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis
Biophysical Journal 111:430–437.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2016.06.013
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Homma M
2. Shiomi D
3. Homma M
4. Kawagishi I
(2004) Attractant binding alters arrangement of chemoreceptor dimers within its cluster at a cell pole
PNAS 101:3462–3467.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0306660101
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Hu B
2. Tu Y
(2013) Precision sensing by two opposing gradient sensors: how does Escherichia coli find its preferred pH level?
Biophysical Journal 105:276–285.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2013.04.054
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Hu B
2. Tu Y
(2014) Behaviors and strategies of bacterial navigation in chemical and nonchemical gradients
PLOS Computational Biology 10:e1003672.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003672
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Humphries J
2. Xiong L
3. Liu J
4. Prindle A
5. Yuan F
6. Arjes HA
7. Tsimring L
8. Süel GM
(2017) Species-independent attraction to biofilms through electrical signaling
Cell 168:200–209.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.014
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Jiang L
2. Ouyang Q
3. Tu Y
(2010) Quantitative modeling of Escherichia coli chemotactic motion in environments varying in space and time
PLOS Computational Biology 6:e1000735.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000735
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Kalinin YV
2. Jiang L
3. Tu Y
4. Wu M
(2009) Logarithmic sensing in Escherichia coli bacterial chemotaxis
Biophysical Journal 96:2439–2448.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.027
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Kalinin Y
2. Neumann S
3. Sourjik V
4. Wu M
(2010) Responses of Escherichia coli Bacteria to two opposing chemoattractant gradients depend on the chemoreceptor ratio
Journal of Bacteriology 192:1796–1800.
https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01507-09
- Google Scholar
1. Krikos A
2. Conley MP
3. Boyd A
4. Berg HC
5. Simon MI
(1985) Chimeric chemosensory transducers of Escherichia coli
PNAS 82:1326–1330.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.82.5.1326
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Lam KH
2. Lam WWL
3. Wong JYK
4. Chan LC
5. Kotaka M
6. Ling TKW
7. Jin DY
8. Ottemann KM
9. Au SWN
(2013) Structural basis of FliG-FliM interaction in Helicobacter pylori
Molecular Microbiology 88:798–812.
https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12222
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2002) Binding and diffusion of CheR molecules within a cluster of membrane receptors
Biophysical Journal 82:1809–1817.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75531-8
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Li M
2. Hazelbauer GL
(2004) Cellular stoichiometry of the components of the chemotaxis signaling complex
Journal of Bacteriology 186:3687–3694.
https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.186.12.3687-3694.2004
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Li M
2. Hazelbauer GL
(2011) Core unit of chemotaxis signaling complexes
PNAS 108:9390–9395.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104824108
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Li X
2. Fleetwood AD
3. Bayas C
4. Bilwes AM
5. Ortega DR
6. Falke JJ
7. Zhulin IB
8. Crane BR
(2013) The 3.2 Å resolution structure of a receptor: CheA:CheW signaling complex defines overlapping binding sites and key residue interactions within bacterial chemosensory arrays
Biochemistry 52:3852–3865.
https://doi.org/10.1021/bi400383e
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Li S
2. Yang F
3. Sun D
4. Zhang Y
5. Zhang M
6. Liu S
7. Zhou P
8. Shi C
9. Zhang L
10. Tian C
(2020) Cryo-EM structure of the hyperpolarization-activated inwardly rectifying potassium channel KAT1 from Arabidopsis
Cell Research 30:1049–1052.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-020-00407-3
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Liu X
2. Zhang C
3. Zhang R
4. Yuan J
(2022) The effect of the second messenger c-di-gmp on bacterial chemotaxis in Escherichia coli
Applied and Environmental Microbiology 88:e0037322.
https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00373-22
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Lupas A
2. Stock J
(1989)
Phosphorylation of an N-terminal regulatory domain activates the CheB methylesterase in bacterial chemotaxis

The Journal of Biological Chemistry 264:17337–17342.
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Lybarger SR
2. Maddock JR
(1999) Clustering of the chemoreceptor complex in Escherichia coli is independent of the methyltransferase CheR and the methylesterase CheB
Journal of Bacteriology 181:5527–5529.
https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.181.17.5527-5529.1999
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Mahon MJ
(2011) pHluorin2: an enhanced, ratiometric, pH-sensitive green florescent protein
Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology 2:132–137.
https://doi.org/10.4236/abb.2011.23021
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Manson MD
2. Blank V
3. Brade G
4. Higgins CF
(1986) Peptide chemotaxis in E. coli involves the Tap signal transducer and the dipeptide permease
Nature 321:253–256.
https://doi.org/10.1038/321253a0
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1965) On the nature of allosteric transitions: a plausible model
Journal of Molecular Biology 12:88–118.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-2836(65)80285-6
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Nakamura S
2. Kami-ike N
3. Yokota JP
4. Kudo S
5. Minamino T
6. Namba K
(2009) Effect of intracellular pH on the torque-speed relationship of bacterial proton-driven flagellar motor
Journal of Molecular Biology 386:332–338.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2008.12.034
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Nanatani K
2. Shijuku T
3. Takano Y
4. Zulkifli L
5. Yamazaki T
6. Tominaga A
7. Souma S
8. Onai K
9. Morishita M
10. Ishiura M
(2015) Comparative Analysis of
Journal of Bacteriology 197:676–687.
https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.02276-14
- Google Scholar
(2010) Differences in signalling by directly and indirectly binding ligands in bacterial chemotaxis
The EMBO Journal 29:3484–3495.
https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.224
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Parkinson JS
(1978) Complementation analysis and deletion mapping of Escherichia coli mutants defective in chemotaxis
Journal of Bacteriology 135:45–53.
https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.135.1.45-53.1978
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Prindle A
2. Liu J
3. Asally M
4. Ly S
5. Garcia-Ojalvo J
6. Süel GM
(2015) Ion channels enable electrical communication in bacterial communities
Nature 527:59–63.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15709
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2017) Osmotaxis in Escherichia coli through changes in motor speed
PNAS 114:E7969–E7976.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620945114
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Scharf BE
2. Fahrner KA
3. Turner L
4. Berg HC
(1998) Control of direction of flagellar rotation in bacterial chemotaxis
PNAS 95:201–206.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.1.201
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2016) Speed-dependent chemotactic precision in marine bacteria
PNAS 113:8624–8629.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602307113
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Sourjik V
2. Berg HC
(2002a) Binding of the Escherichia coli response regulator CheY to its target measured in vivo by fluorescence resonance energy transfer
PNAS 99:12669–12674.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.192463199
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Sourjik V
2. Berg HC
(2002b) Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis
PNAS 99:123–127.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.011589998
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Sourjik V
2. Berg HC
(2004) Functional interactions between receptors in bacterial chemotaxis
Nature 428:437–441.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02406
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Tajima H
2. Imada K
3. Sakuma M
4. Hattori F
5. Nara T
6. Kamo N
7. Homma M
8. Kawagishi I
(2011) Ligand specificity determined by differentially arranged common ligand-binding residues in bacterial amino acid chemoreceptors Tsr and Tar
The Journal of Biological Chemistry 286:42200–42210.
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.221887
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Tian M
2. Zhang C
3. Zhang R
4. Yuan J
(2021) Collective motion enhances chemotaxis in a two-dimensional bacterial swarm
Biophysical Journal 120:1615–1624.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2021.02.021
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Tu Y
2. Shimizu TS
3. Berg HC
(2008) Modeling the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli to time-varying stimuli
PNAS 105:14855–14860.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807569105
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2002) Sensing of cytoplasmic pH by bacterial chemoreceptors involves the linker region that connects the membrane-spanning and the signal-modulating helices
The Journal of Biological Chemistry 277:1593–1598.
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109930200
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Vaknin A
2. Berg HC
(2006) Osmotic stress mechanically perturbs chemoreceptors in Escherichia coli
PNAS 103:592–596.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510047103
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. van Albada SB
2. Ten Wolde PR
(2009) Differential affinity and catalytic activity of CheZ in E. coli chemotaxis
PLOS Computational Biology 5:e1000378.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000378
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2010) Predicted auxiliary navigation mechanism of peritrichously flagellated chemotactic bacteria
PLOS Computational Biology 6:e1000717.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000717
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Wu M
2. Roberts JW
3. Kim S
4. Koch DL
5. DeLisa MP
(2006) Collective bacterial dynamics revealed using a three-dimensional population-scale defocused particle tracking technique
Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72:4987–4994.
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00158-06
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Yang Y
2. Sourjik V
(2012) Opposite responses by different chemoreceptors set a tunable preference point in Escherichia coli pH taxis
Molecular Microbiology 86:1482–1489.
https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12070
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Yuan J
2. Fahrner KA
3. Turner L
4. Berg HC
(2010) Asymmetry in the clockwise and counterclockwise rotation of the bacterial flagellar motor
PNAS 107:12846–12849.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007333107
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2016) Potassium: from physiology to clinical implications
KIDNEY Diseases 2:72–79.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000446268
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Zhang C
2. He R
3. Zhang R
4. Yuan J
(2018) Motor adaptive remodeling speeds up bacterial chemotactic adaptation
Biophysical Journal 114:1225–1231.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2018.01.018
- Google Scholar
Software
1. Zhang C
(2024) 2024_eLife_potassium, version swh:1:rev:08621b03d9b097c58e07a4c134f48af17ac2c038
Software Heritage.

https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:910a59e5fddacfcae6fed75162d69f302369fdea;origin=https://github.com/CZhang2023/2024_eLife_potassium;visit=swh:1:snp:07238aabcdb93222b64923eeedf2969bb5dc1e50;anchor=swh:1:rev:08621b03d9b097c58e07a4c134f48af17ac2c038
1. Zhu X
2. Si G
3. Deng N
4. Ouyang Q
5. Wu T
6. He Z
7. Jiang L
8. Luo C
9. Tu Y
(2012) Frequency-dependent Escherichia coli chemotaxis behavior
Physical Review Letters 108:128101.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.128101
- PubMed
- Google Scholar

Article and author information

Author details

Chi Zhang

Hefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and Department of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China

Contribution
Conceptualization, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

For correspondence
zhchi@ustc.edu.cn

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3154-2657
Rongjing Zhang

Hefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and Department of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China

Contribution
Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing

For correspondence
rjzhang@ustc.edu.cn

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0009-0008-5519-6385
Junhua Yuan

Hefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and Department of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China

Contribution
Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing

For correspondence
jhyuan@ustc.edu.cn

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6437-0655

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (11925406)

Junhua Yuan

National Natural Science Foundation of China (12090053)

Junhua Yuan

National Natural Science Foundation of China (12104436)

Chi Zhang

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2019YFA0709303)

Rongjing Zhang

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK2030000026)

Chi Zhang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China grants (11925406, 12090053, and 12104436), a grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2019YFA0709303), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK2030000026).

Version history

Sent for peer review: August 11, 2023
Preprint posted: August 31, 2023 (view preprint)
Preprint posted: October 11, 2023 (view preprint)
Preprint posted: March 19, 2024 (view preprint)
Preprint posted: May 21, 2024 (view preprint)
Version of Record published: June 4, 2024 (version 1)

Cite all versions

You can cite all versions using the DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91452. This DOI represents all versions, and will always resolve to the latest one.

Copyright

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.