Viruses: Packing up the genome
In order to survive, viruses must be able to copy themselves to make more viral particles. They do this by passing their genetic material to a host cell that can replicate their DNA and produce the components required to assemble more viruses. While all viruses have evolved remarkable mechanisms to ensure the successful completion of their life cycle, viruses containing double-stranded DNA display some of the most ingenious molecular tricks nature has to offer.
Imagine double-stranded DNA as a stiff, pencil-thick piece of yarn the length of a football pitch that needs to be quickly threaded into a protein capsule the size of a football, known as the capsid. During an infection, the packaged DNA strands must then be rapidly ejected from the viral capsid so they can be transmitted to another host cell. How a linear chain, that also displays random conformations, passes through the narrow opening of the capsid during viral genome packaging or subsequent ejection puzzled scientists for decades (Kasianowicz et al., 2002). But little more than twenty years ago, the fascinating mechanical features of viral DNA packaging were discovered (Smith et al., 2001).
Packaging is accomplished by a motor enzyme composed of five circularly arranged oligomers made up of large subunits (known as TerL) and small subunits (TerS) that work together in a coordinated manner (Chemla et al., 2005; Rao and Feiss, 2015). The motor converts energy (generated by breaking down the nucleotide ATP into ADP and inorganic phosphate) into movements that can rapidly thread the entire viral genome into the capsid without ever needing to dissociate and rebind to the DNA (Schliwa and Woehlke, 2003).
Previous work on a virus that infects bacteria called T4 bacteriophage showed that DNA can partially slip out of the capsid during packaging (Ordyan et al., 2018). To prevent this from occurring, the motor has a grip mechanism that controls this process, and an end clamp that stops the viral DNA from completely exiting the capsid once packaging has started. Yet, how the different subunits of the motor contribute to these processes, and how these processes differ in structurally distinct viruses, remained unknown. Now, in eLife, Douglas Smith (University of California San Diego), Carlos Catalano (University of Colorado) and colleagues – including Brandon Rawson as first author – report experiments investigating the mechanical properties of the motor complex in another virus, known as lambda bacteriophage (Rawson et al., 2023).
During packaging, the lambda motor complex frequently transitions between gripping the viral DNA in place and loosening its grip, resulting in the DNA slipping out of the capsid. To better understand the molecular interactions behind this, Rawson et al. employed optical tweezers – a tool that uses focused laser beams to create gentle forces – to pull on the free end of a partially packaged DNA molecule and to measure the direction and magnitude of DNA displacement. These experiments were conducted in a microfluidic chamber so that the virus-DNA assembly could be exposed to different biochemical environments.
To assess the role of ATP in this transition between slipping and gripping, the motor complex was studied in a nucleotide-free state, in the presence of either ADP, or a version of ATP that is not hydrolyzed into ADP. Rawson et al. found that in the nucleotide-free state, rapid DNA slippage occurred, but friction between the DNA and the motor and an end-clamp mechanism prevented complete escape of the DNA molecule. At times, slippage was randomly halted by gripping stages (Figure 1A). In the ADP condition, the frequency and duration of the DNA-gripped state increased, leading to significantly reduced DNA slippage. DNA slippage was essentially halted in non-hydrolyzable ATP conditions, with the DNA being gripped almost continuously (Figure 1B).
Applying force to the free end of the viral DNA using optical tweezers tilted the balance between slipping and gripping states towards slippage. This suggests that the motor of the lambda bacteriophage is regulated by both nucleotides and mechanical forces.
Previous studies have shown the motor complex of the T4 bacteriophage – which lacks the TerS subunits – does not grip when in a nucleotide-free state, in contrast to the lambda motor (Ordyan et al., 2018). This difference between lambda and T4 bacteriophages is likely related to the function of the TerS subunits, which may act as a sliding clamp that controls the level of friction between the motor proteins and DNA. The lambda bacteriophage does, however, display the end-clamp feature observed in T4 phages (Figure 1C), suggesting this is a general mechanism that ensures viral DNA packaging is efficient by avoiding complete genome release and the need to re-initiate the packaging process.
The tour-de-force experiments conducted by Rawson et al. are fundamental for understanding the ever-intricate mechanisms underlying the viral life cycle. A myriad of questions await exploration, however. For instance, how does the motor complex recognize the end of DNA to enable end-clamping? Are the gripping and slipping processes controlled by the same set of protein-DNA interactions? And does DNA ejection rely on similar mechanisms? It also remains to be seen whether these viral tricks could be manipulated to externally control and inhibit viral infections or employed in biotechnology. As questions continue to arise, the elegant viral phenomena will carry on fascinating scientists.
References
-
BookStructure and Dynamics of Confined PolymersKluwer Academic Publishers.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0401-5
-
Mechanisms of DNA packaging by large double-stranded DNA virusesAnnual Review of Virology 2:351–378.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-virology-100114-055212
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2023, Kiss and Kellermayer
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 441
- views
-
- 34
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Physics of Living Systems
Many proteins have been recently shown to undergo a process of phase separation that leads to the formation of biomolecular condensates. Intriguingly, it has been observed that some of these proteins form dense droplets of sizeable dimensions already below the critical concentration, which is the concentration at which phase separation occurs. To understand this phenomenon, which is not readily compatible with classical nucleation theory, we investigated the properties of the droplet size distributions as a function of protein concentration. We found that these distributions can be described by a scale-invariant log-normal function with an average that increases progressively as the concentration approaches the critical concentration from below. The results of this scaling analysis suggest the existence of a universal behaviour independent of the sequences and structures of the proteins undergoing phase separation. While we refrain from proposing a theoretical model here, we suggest that any model of protein phase separation should predict the scaling exponents that we reported here from the fitting of experimental measurements of droplet size distributions. Furthermore, based on these observations, we show that it is possible to use the scale invariance to estimate the critical concentration for protein phase separation.
-
- Computational and Systems Biology
- Physics of Living Systems
Explaining biodiversity is a fundamental issue in ecology. A long-standing puzzle lies in the paradox of the plankton: many species of plankton feeding on a limited variety of resources coexist, apparently flouting the competitive exclusion principle (CEP), which holds that the number of predator (consumer) species cannot exceed that of the resources at a steady state. Here, we present a mechanistic model and demonstrate that intraspecific interference among the consumers enables a plethora of consumer species to coexist at constant population densities with only one or a handful of resource species. This facilitated biodiversity is resistant to stochasticity, either with the stochastic simulation algorithm or individual-based modeling. Our model naturally explains the classical experiments that invalidate the CEP, quantitatively illustrates the universal S-shaped pattern of the rank-abundance curves across a wide range of ecological communities, and can be broadly used to resolve the mystery of biodiversity in many natural ecosystems.