1. Cancer Biology
  2. Cell Biology

Emerging role of oncogenic ß-catenin in exosome biogenesis as a driver of immune escape in hepatocellular carcinoma

  1. Camille Dantzer
  2. Justine Vaché
  3. Aude Brunel
  4. Isabelle Mahouche
  5. Anne-Aurélie Raymond
  6. Jean-William Dupuy
  7. Melina Petrel
  8. Paulette Bioulac-Sage
  9. David Perrais
  10. Nathalie Dugot-Senant
  11. Mireille Verdier
  12. Barbara Bessette
  13. Clotilde Billottet  Is a corresponding author
  14. Violaine Moreau  Is a corresponding author
  1. Université de Bordeaux, INSERM, U1312, BRIC, France
  2. Université de Limoges, INSERM, U1308, CAPTuR, France
  3. Plateforme OncoProt, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, TBM-Core, US5, UAR3457, France
  4. Plateforme Protéome, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux Proteome, France
  5. Bordeaux Imaging Center, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, BIC, France
  6. Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, IINS, Bordeaux, France
  7. Plateforme d'histologie, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, TBM-Core, US5, UAR3457, France
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.95191.3
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Camille Dantzer
  2. Justine Vaché
  3. Aude Brunel
  4. Isabelle Mahouche
  5. Anne-Aurélie Raymond
  6. Jean-William Dupuy
  7. Melina Petrel
  8. Paulette Bioulac-Sage
  9. David Perrais
  10. Nathalie Dugot-Senant
  11. Mireille Verdier
  12. Barbara Bessette
  13. Clotilde Billottet
  14. Violaine Moreau
(2024)
Emerging role of oncogenic ß-catenin in exosome biogenesis as a driver of immune escape in hepatocellular carcinoma
eLife 13:RP95191.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.95191.3
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

eLife assessment

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a particularly aggressive form of cancer, with an increasing number of treatment options approved for use in patients over the past decade. However, the biology of HCC and identifiable therapeutic targets have not been as clear, even in the era of molecular oncology. Likewise, the cellular biology of HCC, including the role of intercellular communication, has not been well elucidated. In this compelling study, Dantzer et al. provide fundamental insight into the role of beta-catenin on intercellular communication occurring via extracellular vesicles, with implications for immune evasion in a cancer increasingly being treated using immuno-oncologic agents.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.95191.3.sa0

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have produced encouraging results in cancer patients. However, the majority of ß-catenin-mutated tumors have been described as lacking immune infiltrates and resistant to immunotherapy. The mechanisms by which oncogenic ß-catenin affects immune surveillance remain unclear. Herein, we highlighted the involvement of ß-catenin in the regulation of the exosomal pathway and, by extension, in immune/cancer cell communication in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We showed that mutated ß-catenin represses expression of SDC4 and RAB27A, two main actors in exosome biogenesis, in both liver cancer cell lines and HCC patient samples. Using nanoparticle tracking analysis and live-cell imaging, we further demonstrated that activated ß-catenin represses exosome release. Then, we demonstrated in 3D spheroid models that activation of β-catenin promotes a decrease in immune cell infiltration through a defect in exosome secretion. Taken together, our results provide the first evidence that oncogenic ß-catenin plays a key role in exosome biogenesis. Our study gives new insight into the impact of ß-catenin mutations on tumor microenvironment remodeling, which could lead to the development of new strategies to enhance immunotherapeutic response.

Introduction

HCC is the most frequent form of primary liver adult cancer (80% of cases). HCC represents the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer-related death (Sung et al., 2021). This pathology has a poor prognosis and the diagnosis is often made at an advanced stage for which treatment options are limited, especially if surgery is no longer possible. In 2020, the combination of Atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) and Bevacizumab (anti-VEGF) became the first-line FDA-approved therapy for advanced HCC (Finn et al., 2020). Despite this therapeutic advance, several studies emphasized that ß-catenin-mutated HCC are devoid of immune infiltrates and are resistant to immunotherapy (Akasu et al., 2021; Pinyol et al., 2019; Ruiz de Galarreta et al., 2019; Sia et al., 2017). CTNNB1 gene mutations are found in 30–40% of HCC and trigger uncontrolled transcriptional activity (de La Coste et al., 1998; Rebouissou et al., 2016). These mutations prevent β-catenin degradation, fostering its role as a transcriptional co-factor and thus the expression of genes involved in cell proliferation and invasion. This altered pattern of gene expression could provide a key to understanding to the observed immune evasion. ß-catenin, encoded by the CTNNB1 gene, is a main oncogene, mutated in various cancers, such as melanoma and liver, endometrial, and colorectal cancers (Kim and Jeong, 2019). These ß-catenin-mutated tumors share specific features, prominent among them a microenvironment devoid of immune infiltrates. Thus, despite of a therapeutic revolution for cancer treatment, with the emergence of immunotherapy and more particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD1, anti-PD-L1), most of the ß-catenin-mutated tumors remain resistant to immunotherapy (Yaguchi et al., 2012; Spranger et al., 2015; Du et al., 2020; Cen et al., 2021; Rotman et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020). In these tumors, the oncogenic β-catenin is able to establish a microenvironment that favors tumor progression notably by promoting immune escape. Few studies have reported that the oncogenic β-catenin is implicated in the impairment of intercellular communication between cancer cells and immune cells, partly through soluble molecules such as cytokines. In melanoma and HCC, a decrease in CCL4 and CCL5, leads to a defective recruitment of dendritic cells and consequently impaired T-cell activity and immune escape (Ruiz de Galarreta et al., 2019; Spranger et al., 2015). As immunotherapies are now part of the growing arsenal for treating cancers, it is important to better understand the mechanisms underlying this immune escape phenotype. In this study, we focused on ß-catenin-mutated HCC and intercellular communication through extracellular vesicles.

Tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) are increasingly described as important actors in tumor microenvironment communication (van Niel et al., 2018); but no studies explored their role in the immune escape and immunotherapy resistance of ß-catenin-mutated tumors. EVs are nanometric phospholipid bilayer transport vesicles, which contain various cargoes such as RNAs or proteins and that impact the properties and functions of recipient cells. EVs can be classified into two main categories: microvesicles and exosomes. Microvesicles (50–1000 nm) correspond to EVs directly secreted from the plasma membrane (PM). By contrast, exosomes (50–150 nm) are released from an endosomal compartment, the multivesicular body (MVB), by its fusion with the cell surface (van Niel et al., 2018). Among the actors implicated in exosome biogenesis and secretion, syndecan-4, involved in the endosomal membrane budding (Baietti et al., 2012) and Rab27a, which promotes the docking of MVB to the PM, play key roles in exosome release (Ostrowski et al., 2010). As important mediators of cell-to-cell communication, EVs can regulate tumor growth, angiogenesis, invasion, and infiltration of immune cells into the tumor (Tkach and Théry, 2016). In the context of HCC, it was reported that EVs derived from tumor cells can modulate epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, intrahepatic metastasis, and tumor immunity (Lee et al., 2021).

Based on these considerations, the current study investigated the role of exosomes in mutated ß-catenin-mediated immune evasion in HCC. We demonstrated that mutated ß-catenin represses syndecan-4 and Rab27a expression, thus altering exosomal secretion from HCC cells, in turn leading to a defective recruitment of immune cells in tumors.

Results

Silencing of mutated ß-catenin increases exosome biogenesis-associated gene expression in HepG2 cells

CTNNB1 mutations in HCC are often monoallelic, leaving a wild-type allele in tumor cells. To study the oncogenic ß-catenin specifically, we made use of the dual ß-catenin knockdown (KD) HepG2 model we published recently (Gest et al., 2023). The transcriptional analysis of HepG2 KD cells revealed that the expression of 1973 genes (log2(Fold-change) >0.5 and<−0.5) is modulated upon mutated ß-catenin silencing (Gest et al., 2023; Figure 1a). Gene ontology analysis (FunRich) performed on upregulated genes showed that mutated ß-catenin silencing enhanced significantly the expression of genes linked to specific cellular components, including exosomes (Figure 1b). Moreover, silencing of the mutated ß-catenin led to the overexpression of 17 genes associated with exosome biogenesis, such as RAB27A and SDC4 (Figure 1c). Similarly, proteomic analysis of HepG2 KD cells revealed exosomes as the main cellular component displaying up-regulated proteins upon mutated ß-catenin silencing (Figure 1d–e). Consistent with the transcriptomic analysis, we found Rab27a and Syndecan-4 among up-regulated proteins (Figure 1f), even if the variability was found for Syndecan-4 protein levels. These results suggest the involvement of mutated ß-catenin in the regulation of the exosomal pathway.

Figure 1
Download asset Open asset
Mutated ß-catenin regulates exosome biogenesis gene expression in HepG2 cells.

(a–f) HepG2 cells were transfected with siRNAs targeting mutated ß-catenin or control siRNAs. (a) Volcano plot of deregulated genes identified by microarray based-transcriptomic analysis. Red and blue dots indicated respectively significantly up- and down-regulated genes. (b) Upregulation of cellular component genes using FunRich software. (c) Upregulated genes associated with exosome biogenesis pathway. The graph indicates the fold change (FC) when comparing the mutated ß-catenin silencing condition with the control condition. (d) Volcano plot of deregulated proteins identified by mass spectrometry. Red and blue dots indicated respectively significantly up- and down-regulated proteins. (e) Upregulation of cellular component proteins identified using FunRich software. (f) Upregulated proteins associated with exosome biogenesis pathway. The graph indicates the fold change when comparing the mutated ß-catenin silencing condition with the control condition. Results are expressed as Mean ± SEM, two-tailed Student’s t-test analysis. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001; ns, non-significant.

Stable depletion of mutated ß-catenin increases exosome secretion in the HepG2 cell model

In the model presented above, siRNAs were used to transiently silence mutated ß-catenin expression in HepG2 cells (Gest et al., 2023). To improve this method, the same sequences were used to develop an inducible shRNA strategy to stably inhibit the expression of the mutated ß-catenin. Through the use of doxycycline-inducible promoters, we were able to regulate the expression of shRNAs over time for more in-depth and specific investigations of ß-catenin function in various cellular processes. In HepG2 cells, this strategy reduced protein expression by 62% for mutated ß-catenin and by 42% for CyclinD1, a ß-catenin-positive transcriptional target (Figure 2a). The model was also validated regarding mRNA expression of several ß-catenin transcriptional targets. We noted a decrease in the expression of CCND1 and AXIN2 (positive targets) and an increase in the expression of ARG1 expression (negative target) (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Also, as previously described with the siRNA strategy (Gest et al., 2023), after mutated ß-catenin depletion in HepG2 cells, we observed an increase in the number and size of bile canaliculi (BC), feature of more differentiated cells (Figure 2—figure supplement 2). Nanoparticle-tracking analysis (NTA) revealed that depleting mutated ß-catenin using either siRNA or shRNA increased the number of secreted particles (Figure 2b, Figure 2—figure supplement 3). The particle mean size (100–150 nm), unaltered by either approach, was consistent with the size of typical small EVs, such as exosomes (Figure 2b, Figure 2—figure supplement 3). To analyze the exosomal release in living HepG2 cells, we used a pH-sensitive reporter (CD63-pHluorin) that allowed the visualization of MVB–PM fusion by total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy (Verweij et al., 2018). The tetraspanin CD63 is a well-known exosome surface marker (Jeppesen et al., 2019; Kowal et al., 2016). In cells expressing CD63-pHluorin, we could detect multiple discrete increases in the fluorescence signal at the PM over the time suggesting ongoing fusion of CD63-pHluorin–positive acidic vesicles with the PM (Figure 2—figure supplement 4). We found that mutated ß-catenin depletion in HepG2 cells significantly increased the number of fusion events associated with secreted exosomes (Figure 2c, Video 1 and Video 2). EVs released by HepG2 cells were next isolated by differential ultracentrifugation and characterized (Figure 2d). First, western-blot analysis of isolated EVs confirmed the expression of the CD63 exosomal marker. It is noteworthy that we observed an increase in CD63 expression after mutated ß-catenin depletion, suggesting an overall increase in the exosomal fraction (Figure 2e). This increased expression of CD63 was also confirmed with the proteomic analysis of HepG2 KD cells (Figure 1f). Moreover, the WT and the mutated forms of the ß-catenin protein were also found in HepG2-derived EVs, and the expression of mutated ß-catenin was decreased relative to the cells of origin (Figure 2e). Using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), we demonstrated that HepG2-derived EVs have the morphology (flat cup-shaped) and size (50–150 nm) of typical exosomes (Yang et al., 2019; Figure 2f and Figure 2—figure supplement 5). To better understand the regulation of exosome secretion by mutated ß-catenin, we next used TEM to visualize MVBs, the origin of exosomes. We observed a higher number of MVBs per cell and an increase in their diameter upon removal of mutated ß-catenin (Figure 2g). Taken together these results highlight that mutated ß-catenin represses exosome secretion.

Figure 2 with 5 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Mutated ß-catenin controls exosome secretion in HepG2 cells.

(a–g) HepG2-shßCat MUT and HepG2-shCtrl cells were treated with doxycycline (DOX) to silence or not mutated ß-catenin. (a) Analysis of ß-catenin and CyclinD1 expression by western-blot. Stain-free was used as a loading control. Graphs show the quantification of seven independent experiments. (b) Nanoparticle tracking analysis of supernatant. Graphs show the quantification of seven independent experiments. (c) Quantification of CD63-pHluorin MVB–PM fusion events visualized by live total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. Depicted data are representative of three independent experiments, each dot represents one cell. Images represent the cell mask (white) and red dots corresponding to fusion events. Scale bar: 10 µm. (d) Extracellular vesicles (EVs) isolation protocol. Created with BioRender.com, and published using a CC BY-NC-ND license with permission (e) Analysis of ß-catenin and CD63 expression in HepG2-derived EVs. Stain-free was used as a loading control. Graphs show the quantification of four independent experiments. (f) Transmission electron microscopy images of HepG2-derived EVs by close-up. Scale bar: 100 nm. The graph shows the diameter quantification of EVs (n=93). (g) Electron microscopy images of HepG2 shCtrl and shßcat MUT cells showing multivesicular bodies (MVBs) (yellow arrowheads). Scale bar: 2 µm (zoom: 500 nm). The graphs show the quantification of the number of multivesicular bodys (MVBs) per cell and the MVB diameter. (a–g) Results are expressed as Mean ± SEM, two-tailed Student’s t-test analysis. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ns, non-significant.

© 2024, BioRender Inc. Figure 2 was created using BioRender, and is published under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Further reproductions must adhere to the terms of this license

Figure 2—source data 1

Original file for the Western blot analysis in Figure 2a (anti-ß-catenin).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig2-data1-v1.zip
Figure 2—source data 2

Original file for the Western blot analysis in Figure 2a (anti-cyclin D1).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig2-data2-v1.zip
Figure 2—source data 3

Original file for the Western blot analysis in Figure 2a (stain-free).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig2-data3-v1.zip
Figure 2—source data 4

PDF containing Figure 2a and original scans of the relevant Western blot analysis (anti-ß-catenin, anti-cyclin D1, and stain-free) with highlighted bands and sample labels.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig2-data4-v1.pdf
Figure 2—source data 5

Original file for the Western blot analysis in Figure 2e (anti-ß-catenin).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig2-data5-v1.zip
Figure 2—source data 6

Original file for the Western blot analysis in Figure 2e (anti-CD63).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig2-data6-v1.zip
Figure 2—source data 7

Original file for the Western blot analysis in Figure 2e (stain-free).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig2-data7-v1.zip
Figure 2—source data 8

PDF containing Figure 2e and original scans of the relevant Western blot analysis (anti-ß-catenin, anti-CD63, and stain- free) with highlighted bands and sample labels.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig2-data8-v1.pdf
Video 1
Download asset
HepG2-shCtrl.

Cells were recorded under TIRF illumination on a microscope (IX83; Olympus) for 2 min. Videos show exocytic events (suddenly appearing fluorescent dots) corresponding to MVB-PM fusion.

Video 2
Download asset
HepG2-shßCat MUT.

Cells were recorded under TIRF illumination on a microscope (IX83; Olympus) for 2 min. Videos show exocytic events (suddenly appearing fluorescent dots) corresponding to MVB-PM fusion.

Mutated ß-catenin decreases Syndecan-4 and Rab27a expression in liver cancer cell lines

To explore the molecular aspect of the alteration of exosome secretion, we first attempted to confirm the data obtained in our transcriptomic and proteomic approaches. In HepG2 cells, we confirmed that transient (Figure 3—figure supplement 1) and stable (Figure 3a–b) mutated ß-catenin depletion increased gene and protein expression of both SDC4 and RAB27A. Due to the lack of efficient antibodies against SDC4, we were unable to analyze SDC4 protein expression by Western-Blot. However, we were able to confirm the increased expression of Syndecan-4 and Rab27a by immunofluorescence (Figure 3c–d). We then extended these results to other liver cancer cell lines. We analyzed SDC4, RAB27A, ARG1, and AXIN2 basal mRNA expression in five different liver cancer cell lines, each with a different CTNNB1 mutational status, and identified positive correlations between SDC4 and RAB27A with ARG1 (ß-catenin-negative target) and negative correlations between SDC4 and RAB27A with AXIN2 (ß-catenin-positive target) (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). Upon analyzing the basal expression of Rab27a protein in these five cell lines, we identified a negative correlation between ß-catenin and Rab27a expression (Figure 3—figure supplement 3). In the two liver cancer cell lines bearing a ß-catenin point mutation (Huh6 and SNU398 cells), inducible shRNA strategy with doxycycline reduced ß-catenin protein expression by 63% and 49%, respectively (Figure 3—figure supplement 4). Associated with that reduction in ß-catenin protein expression we observed a decrease in CCND1 and AXIN2 mRNA expression and an increase in ARG1 mRNA expression in both cell lines (Figure 3—figure supplement 5). As in HepG2 cells, ß-catenin depletion also increased SDC4 and RAB27A gene expression and Rab27a protein expression in Huh6 and SNU398 cells treated with doxycycline (Figure 3e–h). In order to mimic the ß-catenin activation in a non-mutated HCC cell line, we treated Huh7 cells with a GSK3 inhibitor (CHIR99021) limiting ß-catenin phosphorylation and degradation. This CHIR99021 treatment increased ß-catenin protein expression (2.37-fold) (Figure 3i) and induced its translocation into the nucleus in Huh7 cells (Figure 3j) where concomitant deregulation of ß-catenin transcriptional targets was observed (Figure 3—figure supplement 6). Consistent with our earlier data using HepG2 cells, CHIR99021 treatment decreased SDC4 and RAB27A gene expression, and Rab27a protein level in Huh7 cells (Figure 3k–l). Then, we used TIRF microscopy to analyze exosomal release in living Huh7 cells expressing CD63-pHluorin. We found that CHIR99021 treatment significantly decreased the number of fusion events in Huh7 cells (Figure 3m, Video 3 and Video 4). All together, these results revealed that ß-catenin mutation/activation represses the expression of syndecan-4 and Rab27A, two proteins involved in exosome biogenesis, in association with repression of exosomal secretion.

Video 3
Download asset
Huh7 treated with DMSO.

Cells were recorded under total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) illumination on a microscope (IX83; Olympus) for 2 min. Videos show exocytic events (suddenly appearing fluorescent dots) corresponding to MVB-PM fusion.

Video 4
Download asset
CHIR99021 cells were transfected with CD63-pHluorin corresponding to Figures 2c and 3m.

Cells were recorded under total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) illumination on a microscope (IX83; Olympus) for 2 min. Videos show exocytic events (suddenly appearing fluorescent dots) corresponding to MVB-PM fusion.

Figure 3 with 6 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Activated ß-catenin represses SDC4 and RAB27A expression in liver cancer cells.

(a–d) HepG2 cells were treated with doxycycline (DOX) to express either a control shRNA (shCtrl) or a shRNA targeting mutated ß-catenin (shßcat MUT). (a) Analysis of SDC4 and RAB27A mRNA expression by qRT-PCR. Graphs show the quantification. (b) Analysis of Rab27a protein expression by western-blot. Stain-free was used as a loading control. The graph shows the quantification. (c–d) Epifluorescence images of HepG2 shCtrl and shßcat MUT cells stained with Syndecan-4 and Rab27a antibodies (red), Phalloidin (green), Hoechst (blue). Scale bar: 20 µm. Graphs show the quantification of the fluorescence intensity per image and divided per nuclei. Depicted data are representative of three independent experiments, each dot represents one image. (e) Analysis of SDC4 and RAB27A mRNA expression in Huh6 cells expressing either a control shRNA (shCtrl) or a shRNA targeting ß-catenin (shßcat) treated with DOX. The graph shows the quantification. (f) Analysis of SDC4 and RAB27A mRNA expression in SNU398 cells expressing either a control shRNA (shCtrl) or a shRNA targeting ß-catenin (shßcat) treated with DOX. The graph shows the quantification. (g–h) Analysis of Rab27a protein expression in Huh6 (g) or SNU398 (h) cells expressing either a control shRNA (shCtrl) or a shRNA targeting ß-catenin (shßcat). Stain-free was used as a loading control. The graphs show the quantification. (i–m) Huh7 cells treated with DMSO or CHIR99021 (3 µM) for 48 hr. (i) Analysis of ß-catenin expression by western blot. The graph shows the quantification. (j) Epifluorescence images of cells stained with ß-catenin antibody (red), Phalloidin (green), Hoechst (blue). Scale bar: 20 µm. (k) Analysis of SDC4 and RAB27A mRNA expression by qRT-PCR. The graphs show the quantification. (l) Analysis of Rab27a protein expression by western-blot. The graph shows the quantification. (m) Quantification of CD63-pHluorin MVB–PM fusion events visualized by live total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. Depicted data are representative of three independent experiments; each dot represents one cell. Images represent the cell mask (white) and red dots corresponding to fusion events. (a–m) All graphs show the quantification of at least three independent experiments. Results are expressed as Mean ± SEM, two-tailed Student’s t-test analysis. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.

Figure 3—source data 1

Original file for the Western blot analysis in Figure 3b (anti-Rab27a).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig3-data1-v1.zip
Figure 3—source data 2

Original file for the Western blot analysis in Figure 3b (stain-free).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig3-data2-v1.zip
Figure 3—source data 3

PDF containing Figure 3b and original scans of the relevant Western blot analysis (anti-Rab27a and stain-free) with highlighted bands and sample labels.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig3-data3-v1.pdf
Figure 3—source data 4

Original file for the Western blot analysis in Figure 3g (anti-Rab27a).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig3-data4-v1.zip
Figure 3—source data 5

Original file for the Western blot analysis in Figure 3g (stain-free).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig3-data5-v1.zip
Figure 3—source data 6

PDF containing Figure 3g and original scans of the relevant Western blot analysis (anti-Rab27a and stain-free) with highlighted bands and sample labels.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig3-data6-v1.pdf
Figure 3—source data 7

Original file for the Western blot analysis in Figure 3h (anti-Rab27a).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig3-data7-v1.zip
Figure 3—source data 8

Original file for the Western blot analysis in Figure 3h (stain- free).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig3-data8-v1.zip
Figure 3—source data 9

PDF containing Figure 3h and original scans of the relevant Western blot analysis (anti-Rab27a and stain-free) with highlighted bands and sample labels.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig3-data9-v1.pdf
Figure 3—source data 10

Original file for the Western blot analysis in Figure 3i (anti-ß-catenin).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig3-data10-v1.zip
Figure 3—source data 11

Original file for the Western blot analysis in Figure 3i (stain- free).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig3-data11-v1.zip
Figure 3—source data 12

PDF containing Figure 3i and original scans of the relevant Western blot analysis (anti-ß-catenin and stain-free) with highlighted bands and sample labels.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig3-data12-v1.pdf
Figure 3—source data 13

Original file for the Western blot analysis in Figure 3l (anti-Rab27a).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig3-data13-v1.zip
Figure 3—source data 14

Original file for the Western blot analysis in Figure 3l (stain-free).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig3-data14-v1.zip
Figure 3—source data 15

PDF containing Figure 3l and original scans of the relevant Western blot analysis (anti-Rab27a and stain-free) with highlighted bands and sample labels.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/95191/elife-95191-fig3-data15-v1.pdf

Mutated ß-catenin promotes immune evasion in HCC cells through exosomes

Our next goal was to investigate the possible role of mutated ß-catenin in HCC immune escape. We used 3D spheroid models from two liver cancer cell lines (HepG2 and Huh7) and after 24 hr co-culture of spheroids with Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC), immune cell infiltration was evaluated by flow cytometry (Figure 4a–b). First of all, we assessed the capability of PBMC to invade spheroids formed from Huh7 cells treated with CHIR9901. We observed a decrease in PBMC infiltration and an increase in tumor cell survival in Huh7 cells were treated with CHIR9901 compared to the results seen in the control condition (Figure 4c). Of note, we confirmed that CHIR99021 increased ß-catenin and decreased Rab27a protein expression in Huh7 spheroids with no impact on the cell viability (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). Next, we showed that the depletion of mutated ß-catenin protein enhanced PBMC infiltration in HepG2 cells associated with a decrease in tumor cell survival (Figure 4d). We verified that mutated ß-catenin protein was correctly depleted in HepG2 spheroids, with an increase in Rab27a protein expression and no impact on cell viability (Figure 4—figure supplement 2). Altogether, these results confirm the involvement of mutated ß-catenin in immune evasion. We next sought to investigate the role of exosomes in this process. In order to blunt exosome secretion, we used siRNA directed against Rab27a in spheroids formed with HepG2 cells depleted of mutated ß-catenin. Rab27a depletion decreased the number of secreted particles without any effect on cell viability in HepG2 shßcat MUT spheroids (Figure 4—figure supplement 3). Furthermore, depletion of Rab27a decreased PBMC infiltration associated with an increase of tumor cell survival (Figure 4e). Taken together, these results strongly suggest a determinant role for exosomes in immune cell infiltration.

Figure 4 with 3 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Activated ß-catenin represses immune infiltration in liver cancer spheroids through exosomes.

(a) Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) infiltration analysis protocol. Created with BioRender.com, and published using a CC BY-NC-ND license with permission. (b) Images of HepG2 spheroids expressing a control shRNA incubated or not with PBMC for 24 hr. (c) Analysis of PBMC infiltration and tumor cell survival in Huh7 spheroids treated with DMSO or CHIR99021. (d) Analysis of PBMC infiltration and tumor cell survival in HepG2 spheroids expressing control shRNA (shCtrl) or shRNA targeting mutated ß-catenin (shßcat MUT). (e) Analysis of PBMC infiltration and tumor cell survival in HepG2 spheroids co-expressing shRNA targeting mutated ß-catenin (shßcat MUT) and control siRNA (siCtrl) or siRNA targeting Rab27A (siRab27A). (c–e) Graphs show the quantification of six independent experiments. Results are expressed as Mean ± SEM, one or two-tailed Student’s t-test analysis. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.

© 2024, BioRender Inc. Figure 4 was created using BioRender, and is published under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Further reproductions must adhere to the terms of this license

CTNNB1 mutations are associated with low expression of exosomal biogenesis-associated genes in HCC patient samples

To determine whether markers of exosomal biogenesis are deregulated in HCC human samples, we assessed the expression of SDC4 and RAB27A using public transcriptomic data from two different cohorts (Figure 5a: TGCA data sets from Cbioportal, Figure 5b; Boyault et al., 2007). In both sets of data, we showed that SDC4 and RAB27A gene expressions were significantly reduced in CTNNB1-mutated HCCs compared to non-mutated tumors (Figure 5a–b). Furthermore, Pearson’s correlation analysis of these two cohorts revealed that RAB27A and SDC4 gene expression were positively correlated with the expression of ARG1 and PCK1 (ß-catenin-negative targets) (Benhamouche et al., 2006) and negatively correlated with the expression of GLUL, CCND1, AXIN2, LGR5, FAT1, and BMP4 (ß-catenin-positive targets) (Figure 5—figure supplement 1). We then performed immunohistochemical analysis on 56 human HCC samples with or without CTNNB1 mutations (Figure 5—figure supplement 2). We found that tumors strongly positive for glutamine synthetase (a well-known ß-catenin-positive target in the liver Cadoret et al., 2002), were correlated with low levels of Rab27a protein expression (Figure 5c), supporting the link between ß-catenin activation and regulation of exosomal secretion through a decrease in Rab27a expression.

Figure 5 with 2 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Downregulation of SDC4 and RAB27A in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) samples with CTNNB1 mutations.

(a) Analysis of SDC4 and RAB27A mRNA expression in ß-catenin mutated (red) and non-mutated (blue) HCC (Cbioportal cohort, n=366). (b) Analysis of SDC4 and RAB27A mRNA expression in ß-catenin mutated (red) and non-mutated (blue) HCC (Boyault et al. cohort, n=56). (c) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis of glutamine synthetase (GS) and Rab27a in HCC samples presenting or not ß-catenin mutations. Scale bar: 1 mm. (T: tumoral, NT: non tumoral). The upper graphs show the quantification of the percentage of cells positive for GS or Rab27A. The analysis was split into two cohorts (circle and triangle). The lower graph shows the Pearson correlation between Rab27a and GS protein expression (n=56). Results are expressed as Mean ± SEM, two-tailed Student’s t-test analysis, or Pearson correlation test. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001.

Discussion

ß-catenin is a main oncogene in tumors (Kim and Jeong, 2019) and several studies have reported a key role for mutated ß-catenin in immune escape in several types of cancer such as HCC, colorectal cancer, melanoma, and glioblastoma (Sia et al., 2017; Spranger et al., 2015; Du et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020), but its mechanisms of action in this process remain to be elucidated. During the past decades, ß-catenin-mutated HCC have been classified at the molecular, histo-pathological, and clinical levels as liver cancers with specific features (Hoshida et al., 2009; Shimada et al., 2019; Calderaro et al., 2017). More recently, these tumors have been described as cold with low immune infiltrates and resistant to immunotherapy (Akasu et al., 2021; Pinyol et al., 2019; Ruiz de Galarreta et al., 2019; Sia et al., 2017).

In this study, we deciphered the role of mutated ß-catenin in cell communication between cancer cells and immune cells. Based on omic results, we hypothesized a role for EVs in the control of immune infiltrates in ß-catenin-mutated HCC. Following ISEV guidelines (Théry et al., 2018), we applied various techniques to address the impact of ß-catenin activation on EV secretion. Using NTA, we demonstrated that HepG2 cells silenced for mutated ß-catenin secrete more nanoparticles than control cells. Our different analyses and results (TIRF with the CD63 exosomal marker, TEM for the EVs shape and size, regulation of Rab27a expression) led us to take a strong interest in small EVs (i.e. exosomes), a subpopulation of EVs. Using real-time visualization of the release of CD63-enriched EVs we demonstrated that mutated ß-catenin silencing in HepG2 cells favors small EV secretion. The link between activation of ß-catenin and secretion of small EVs was further confirmed in ß-catenin non-mutated cells, Huh7 cells, treated with GSK3 inhibitor, suggesting that activation of the Wnt/ß-catenin pathway may result in a repression of the EV machinery in tumor cells. This link between ß-catenin and EVs was poorly explored in the literature and essentially restricted to the identification of ß-catenin as a common EV cargo (Kalra et al., 2019). For example, it was shown that tetraspanin expression reduces the cellular pool of β-catenin by enhancing the exosome-associated export of β-catenin from the cell and that this exosomal discharge of β-catenin downregulates the Wnt signaling pathway (Chairoungdua et al., 2010). More recently, using a genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9-mediated screening to identify genes involved in EV release, Lu et al. identified the Wnt signaling pathway in the top hits (Lu et al., 2018). Indeed, by this approach, a number of Wnt-signaling modulators appeared among the candidates as EV biogenesis regulators, which were further validated in chronic myelogenous leukemia K562 cells. Lu et al. also demonstrated that Wnt-mediated GSK3 inactivation, in K562 cells, regulated EV release in a Rab27a-dependent manner (Lu et al., 2018). Herein, we added new findings reporting that this regulation also occurs in solid tumors. Moreover, we demonstrated for the first time the specific involvement of the oncogenic ß-catenin in the regulation of exosome biogenesis.

At the molecular level, thanks to global approaches we found that oncogenic ß-catenin represses the expression of genes involved in the EV machinery. We indeed found that genes from the Rab (RAB8B, RAB11A, RAB11B, RAB17, RAB27A), Vamp (VAMP2, VAMP5, VAMP8) and Vps (VPS4A, VPS4B, VPS16, VPS28) families were upregulated upon removal of the oncogenic ß-catenin in HepG2 cells. Therefore, several trafficking steps could be impaired along the EV secretion pathway, the MVB biogenesis with the Vps, the transport and docking with the Rab, and the final step of membrane fusion with the Vamp (van Niel et al., 2018). Herein, we focused on RAB27A and SDC4 genes, which were the most dysregulated in our transcriptomic analysis. We showed that mutated ß-catenin represses their gene expression in liver cancer cell lines. In non-mutated ß-catenin HCC cells, activation of ß-catenin showed that both gene and protein expression of Rab27a were decreased. We further found a correlation between the presence of CTNNB1 mutations and the low expression of RAB27A and SDC4 in human HCC patient samples. The way RAB27A and SDC4 gene expression is repressed by ß-catenin remains to be explored. We described positive correlation between expression of SDC4 and RAB27A and expression of negative transcriptional targets of ß-catenin, as well as a negative correlation with expression of positive targets in tumors. Even if the mechanism by which ß-catenin and LEF/TCF transcription factors led to target gene expression activation is well known (Gest et al., 2023; Lustig et al., 2002; Nejak-Bowen and Monga, 2008), it is not the case for the repression process. In melanoma, the transcription repressor ATF3 induced by the Wnt/ß-catenin pathway has been associated with CCL4 repression (Spranger et al., 2015). Analysis of SDC4 and RAB27A promoter sequences revealed the presence of consensus sequences of Lef1, Tcf4, and Atf3 binding (data not shown), suggesting that these newly identified target genes could be regulated at the transcriptional level by transcription factors known to associate with ß-catenin. In this line, SDC4 was found to be a negative Tcf4 target gene in HCC mouse models (Gougelet et al., 2014).

Following the EV machinery alteration, we further addressed the impact of the ß-catenin-mediated repression of EV secretion on immune cell infiltration in tumors. Herein, the functional role of these tumor-derived exosomes in tumor immunity was studied using liver cancer 3D models and PBMC. Using siRNA depletion of Rab27a, we showed that mutated ß-catenin promotes a decrease of immune cell infiltration in micro-tumors through a decrease in exosome secretion. The small GTPase Rab27a has been implicated in several cancer progression mechanisms such as metastasis, cell invasion, or migration (Li et al., 2018). The oncogenic function of Rab27a is mainly due to its function as regulator of exosome secretion, which modulates cancer cell function and tumor microenvironment. In mammary carcinoma cells, the decrease of exosome secretion by Rab27a inhibition resulted in a diminution of primary tumor growth and lung metastatic dissemination (Bobrie et al., 2012). However, shRNA knockdown of Rab27a in a prostate cancer model revealed a dominant immunosuppressive role for EVs during antigen cross-presentation (Salimu et al., 2017). These data are inconsistent with our own, meaning so it seems that Rab27a-induced exosomal secretion could be a ‘double-edged sword’ in tumor progression. This could be due to the content of EVs. In fact, EVs are known to contain heterogeneous cargos that can play a critical role in immunomodulation (Marar et al., 2021). For example, the main immunosuppressive cytokine TGF-ß expressed by tumoral-derived EVs has been identified in Natural Killer cell function suppression (Berchem et al., 2016; Viel et al., 2016). EVs released by tumoral cells can also carry several miRNAs mainly known to be involved in immune suppression (Marar et al., 2021). MiR-103a and Let-7a in tumor EVs promote M2-like polarization in lung and melanoma cancers (Hsu et al., 2018; Park et al., 2019). Interestingly, immunomodulatory proteins such as CSF-1, CCL2, FTH, FTL, and TGF-β chemokines have been identified in tumor exosomes (Park et al., 2019). The content of ß-catenin-regulated EVs remains to be explored to fully understand their function in the immunomodulation of the tumor microenvironment.

In conclusion, this study is the first description of the oncogenic ß-catenin as a key regulator of the exosome machinery. Moreover, it gave new insights regarding the regulation of tumor-derived exosome production by the ß-catenin pathway and their involvement in the immune escape observed in ß-catenin mutated HCC. Given that ß-catenin is also mutated in melanoma, endometrial, and colorectal cancers, these new findings may have a broader significance. Our data indicate that exosomes could be a promising biomarker and that restoring the tumor exosomal secretion of ß-catenin-mutated tumors may increase the communication between tumor and immune cells, and as a result, turn cold tumors hot.

Materials and methods

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Cell line (Homo sapiens)Hepatocellular carcinomaATCCHepG2
Cell line (Homo sapiens)Hepatocellular carcinomaATCCHuh7
Cell line (Homo sapiens)Hepatocellular carcinomaATCCSNU398
Cell line (Homo sapiens)HepatoblastomaPerret (Paris, France)Huh6
Transfected construct (human)AllStars negative-control siRNAQiagenSI03650318
Transfected construct (human)siRNA to
ß-catenin		Eurofins Genomics Gest et al., 2023
Transfected construct (human)siRNA to Rab27ASigmaMISSION EHU091501
Transfected construct (human)pCMV-Sport6-CD36-pHluorinAddgenePlasmid#
130901		TIRF experiment
Transfected construct (human)Tet-pLKO-puro lentivirus vectorAddgeneplasmid#
21915		Lentiviral construct to transfect and express the shRNA.
Peptide, recombinant proteinpLKO-Tet-On-shRNA-ControlAddgeneplasmid#
398398
Chemical compound, drugGSK3 inhibitor CHIR99021SigmaSML10463 µM
Biological sample (Homo sapiens)PBMCEFSFreshly isolated from human blood
OtherCellTrace VioletLife Technologies5 µM, FACS experiment to detect immune cells
OtherPropidium IodideSigmaP41701/500 dilution, FACS experiment to detect dead cells
Sequence-based reagentCCND1_FGest et al., 2023PCR primersCATCAAGTGTGACCCGGACTG
Sequence-based reagentCCND1_RGest et al., 2023PCR primersCCTCCTCCTCAGTGGCCTTG
Sequence-based reagentAXIN2_FGest et al., 2023PCR primersTGCTCTGTTTTGTCTTAAAGGTCTTGA
Sequence-based reagentAXIN2_RGest et al., 2023PCR primersACAGATCATCCCATCCAACACA
Sequence-based reagentARG1_FGest et al., 2023PCR primersGTGGACAGACTAGGAATTGGC
Sequence-based reagentARG1_RGest et al., 2023PCR primersTCCAGTCCGTCAACATCAAAAC
Sequence-based reagentRAB27A_FThis paperPCR primersGAAGCCATAGCACTCGCAGAG
Sequence-based reagentRAB27A_RThis paperPCR primersATGACCATTTGATCGCACCA
Sequence-based reagentSDC4_FThis paperPCR primersCGATGAGGATGTAGTGGGGC
Sequence-based reagentSDC4_RThis paperPCR primersGACAACTTCAGGGCCGATCA
Sequence-based reagent18 S_FGest et al., 2023PCR primersGTAACCCGTTGAACCCCATT
Sequence-based reagent18 S _RGest et al., 2023PCR primersCCATCCAATCGGTAGTAGCG
AntibodyAnti-ß-catenin (mouse monoclonal)BD Biosciences610154WB: 1/2000,
IF: 1/400
AntibodyAnti-Cyclin D1 (mouse monoclonal)Santa Cruzsc-20044WB: 1/1000
AntibodyAnti-Rab27a (rabbit monoclonal)Cell signaling69295WB: 1/1000,
IF: 1/800,
IHC: 1/100 pH6
AntibodyAnti-CD63 (rabbit polyclonal)SigmaSAB4301607WB: 1/500
AntibodyAnti-SDC4 (rabbit polyclonal)Cell signaling12236IF: 1/200
OtherHoechstSigma34580IF: 1/1000, to detect nucleus
Other488 phalloidinInterchimYE5180IF: 1/200, to detect F-actin
AntibodyAnti-Glutamine synthetase (mouse monoclonal)BD Biosciences610517IHC: 1/400 pH6

Cell culture

Human HepG2 and Huh7 cell lines were grown in 4.5 g/L glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS (Fetal Bovine Serum, Sigma). Human Huh6 cells were grown in 1 g/L glucose DMEM, (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS. Human SNU398 cells were grown in Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI 1640, Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS. Heat-inactivated FBS was used (30 min, 56 °C). All cell lines were cultured in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 and 37 °C and mycoplasma contamination was checked regularly by PCR. All cell lines, except Huh6, were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). The Huh6 cell line was generously provided by C. Perret (Paris, France).

Transfection

Request a detailed protocol

DNA transfections were performed using the Lipofectamine 3000 transfection Reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). The following plasmid was used: pCMV-Sport6-CD36-pHluorin (Plasmid#130901, Addgene). siRNA oligos were transfected into cells using Lipofectamine RNAiMax Reagent according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen). A reverse transfection was performed on day 1, a second forward transfection on day 2 and experiments were conducted on day 5. siRNA ß-catenin MUT (Eurofins Genomics) was previously reported (Gest et al., 2023), siRNA RAB27A (MISSION EHU091501, Sigma) targets human RAB27A. The AllStars negative-control siRNA from Qiagen was used as control siRNA.

Lentiviral infection

Request a detailed protocol

HEK293T cells were seeded (2.5×106) on a 10 cm plate coated with poly-L-lysine (Sigma) to obtain a confluence of 50–70% at the time of the infection. The next day, 600 µL of Opti-MEM (Gibco), 22 µL of Mirus LT1 transfection reagent (Mirus), and 4 µg of lentiviral plasmids of packaging vector (pPAX, pSD11) and lentiviral plasmid of interest were added on cells and incubated for 48 hr to allow the production of viruses. Then supernatant was harvested, centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 3 min to remove dead cells and debris, filtered, and used directly to infect cells or stored at –80 °C. After infection with lentiviral particles, cells were selected with puromycin treatment (2 µg/mL) for 1 week.

shRNAs

Request a detailed protocol

The Tet-pLKO-puro lentivirus vector (plasmid#21915) and the control shRNA lentivirus vector (pLKO-Tet-On-shRNA-Control, plasmid#398398) were purchased from Addgene (Watertown, USA). The construction of the two shRNA lentivirus vectors targeting the human ß-catenin was performed following the Tet-pLKO Manual given by Addgene (plasmid#21915). The shRNA sequences used were the same as previously described (Gest et al., 2023): the 5’-ACCAGTTGTGGTTAAGCTCTT-3 sequence to target the human ß-catenin in Huh-6 and SNU398 cells, and the 5’-TGTTAGTCACAACTATCAAGA-3’ sequence to target specifically the mutated form of ß-catenin in HepG2 cells. shRNAs were induced with doxycycline (1 µg/mL) in Huh6 cells for 5 days (2 treatments) and in HepG2 and SNU398 cells for 7 days (3 treatments).

Drug treatment

Request a detailed protocol

Huh7 cells were treated with the GSK3 inhibitor CHIR99021 (3 µM, Sigma) for 48 hr before cell analysis. DMSO was used as control.

Spheroid formation

Request a detailed protocol

Human Huh7 cells treated with either DMSO or CHIR99021 (3 µM; Sigma) for 48 hr were seeded (20,000 cells per well in 100 µL) in non-adherent conditions (ultra-low attachment 96 wells plate, Costar) in filtered 4.5 g/L glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Gibco) supplemented with 10% exosome free FBS. Human HepG2 cell line was transfected with either control shRNA or shRNA directed against mutated β-catenin (shBcat MUT) and induced with doxycycline (1 µg/mL, three rounds in one week). HepG2 shßcat MUT were also transfected with siRNA targeting Rab27a the day before the seeding for the reverse transfection (day 0) and the day of the seeding for the second forward transfection (day 1). 10,000 HepG2 cells were seeded per well in non-adherent conditions (ultra-low attachment 96 wells plate, Costar) in 100 µL filtrated 4.5 g/L glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Gibco) supplemented with 10% exosome free FBS for 96 hr. The induction of shRNA was maintained by adding doxycycline in each well (1 µg/mL in 50 µL) on the day of the seeding and 48 hr after.

Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) infiltration

Request a detailed protocol

After 96 hr of formation, Huh7 and HepG2 spheroids were co-cultured with CellTrace Violet (Life Technologies) labeled PBMC. Briefly, PBMC were isolated from donor blood (EFS Bordeaux) using a Ficoll (Eurobio Scientific) density gradient centrifugation. The obtained cells were then centrifuged (10 min, 1500 rpm) and washed several times in PBS 1 X. The remaining red blood cells were lysed by incubation in an ACK lysing buffer (Gibco), and the platelets were eliminated by centrifugation (10 min, 900 rpm). PBMC were then stained with Cell Trace Violet (5 μM, 20 min, 37 °C, 106 cells/mL) and added to the wells (ratio tumor cells per spheroid:PBMC = 1:5, in 50 µL) for a 24 hr co-culture. After 24 hr, spheroids were collected, washed twice with PSB 1 X, and dissociated with trypsin 0.25%-EDTA (10 min, 37 °C, Gibco). Cells were then pelleted by centrifugation, resuspended in 200 µL of MACS buffer (PBS 1 X Dutscher, 0.5% FBS Eurobio Scientific, 0.4% EDTA 0.5 mM Euromedex), and labeled with Propidium Iodide (1/500 dilution, Sigma-Aldrich). The proportion of immune cells infiltrated in spheroids and tumor cells survival was then analyzed by flow cytometry (CantoII cytometer, BD Biosciences, Le Pont de Claix, France) and data analysis was performed with the FlowJo software (version 10.8.1).

qRT-PCR analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Total RNA was extracted from cells using the kit NucleoSpin RNA (Macherey-Nagel). RNA was then reverse transcribed using material from Thermo Fisher Scientific. qPCR was performed using the SYBR Green SuperMix (Quanta) using a C1000 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad). Data were normalized using the r18S gene as endogenous control and fold change was calculated using the comparative Ct method (-ddCt). All primers used are listed in Table 1.

Table 1
qPCR primers.
PrimerForwardReverse
CCND1CATCAAGTGTGACCCGGACTGCCTCCTCCTCAGTGGCCTTG
AXIN2TGCTCTGTTTTGTCTTAAAGGTCTTGAACAGATCATCCCATCCAACACA
ARG1GTGGACAGACTAGGAATTGGCTCCAGTCCGTCAACATCAAAAC
RAB27AGAAGCCATAGCACTCGCAGAGATGACCATTTGATCGCACCA
SDC4CGATGAGGATGTAGTGGGGCGACAACTTCAGGGCCGATCA
18 SGTAACCCGTTGAACCCCATTCCATCCAATCGGTAGTAGCG

Western blot

Request a detailed protocol

Total proteins were extracted from cells or EVs using RIPA lysis buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% NP40, 0.15 M NaCl, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 25 mM Tris HCl pH 7.4) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche). Proteins were then denaturated in Laemmli buffer (Bio-Rad) at 95 °C for 5 min. 40 µg of protein extract was loaded on 10% polyacrylamide gels (TGX Stain-Free FastCast, Bio-Rad). Membranes were blocked with 5% BSA-TBST (5% BSA Sigma, TBS 1 x Euromedex, 0,1% Tween20 Sigma) for 30 min and incubated with primary antibodies (diluted in 5% BSA-TBST) overnight at 4 °C. The following primary antibodies were used: ß-catenin (1:2000, mouse, 610154, BD Biosciences), Cyclin D1 (1:1000, mouse, sc-20044, Santa Cruz), Rab27a (1:1000, rabbit, 69295, Cell signaling), CD63 (1:500, rabbit, SAB430160, Sigma). Membranes were then incubated with secondary antibodies (1:5000 diluted in 5% BSA-TBST) for 30 min. The following secondary antibodies were used: IRDye 680CW conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H&L) (LI-COR), IRDye 800CW conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (H&L) (LI-COR). Acquisitions were performed using the ChemiDoc Imaging System (Bio-Rad). Intensities were measured using the ImageLab software (Bio-Rad).

EVs isolation and characterization

Cells (2 million) were cultured in medium (7 mL) supplemented with EV-depleted FBS (obtained by ultracentrifugation for 16 hr at 120,000 g, using an Optima XPN-80 centrifuge with a 45.Ti rotor). EVs were isolated 72 hr after by differential centrifugation at 4 °C: 5 min at 300 g, 5 min at 2000 g, 40 min at 18,000 g and 120 min at 120,000 g. EV pellets were washed in PBS, centrifuged again at 120,000 g for 120 min, resuspended in PBS (or RIPA lysis buffer), and stored at –80 °C.

Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA)

Request a detailed protocol

Number and size of particles were detected using the NS300 instrument (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK) equipped with a 488 nm laser and a high-sensitivity scientific CMOS camera. Particles are tracked and sized based on Brownian motion and diffusion coefficient. Particles were diluted in PBS to obtain a concentration within the recommended range (30–120 particles/frame). Five 60 s videos were acquired for each sample with the following conditions: cell temperature 25 °C, syringe speed—22 µL/s, camera level 14. Videos were subsequently analyzed with NanoSight Software NTA3.3.301 (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK), which identified and tracked the center of each particle under Brownian motion to measure the average distance the particles moved on a frame-by-frame basis.

Electron microscopy

Cells

Cells were fixed in EM fixative solution (1.6% Ga in PB 0.1 M pH 7.4) for 1 hr at room temperature and then centrifuged. Cell pellets were embedded in 1% agarose. Samples were washed three times with PB 0.1 M and postfixed in 1.5% potassium ferrocyanide, 2% aqueous osmium tetroxide solution in PB 0.1 M for 1 hr at room temperature. Before and between each of the following incubations, samples were washed three times with distilled water. Samples were first incubated in fresh thiocarboxyhydrazide (TCH) solution for 20 min at room temperature. In a second postfixation step, a 2% osmium tetroxide solution was added to samples for 30 min at room temperature. Samples were then serially dehydrated in ethanol (35%, 35%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 100%, 100%; 2 min each), incubated in a solution of 50% ethanol and 50% Epon resin for 2 hr and incubated in 100% Epon resin overnight at room temperature. Epon resin was then renewed for another 4 hr of incubation. At the end, samples were embedded in a pure resin and cured by incubation at 60 °C for 48 hr. Ultramicrotomy was done with a Diatome 35° Diamond knife and a Leica EM-UC7 ultracut. Sections (70 nm thick) were collected on 200 mesh copper grid. Images were acquired using a transmission electron microscope (Hitachi H7650) at 80Kv equipped with an Orius Camera (Gatan) managed by Digital Micrograph software. The quantification of the number of MVBs was performed by counting visible MVBs and then dividing per the cell surface using ImageJ software. The quantification of the MVB diameter was performed using ImageJ software.

EVs

Request a detailed protocol

Cell supernatant fluid was concentrated using an Amicon Ultra-15 centrifugal filter from 6 mL to 500 µL at 4000 g during 30 min (100 k, Merk Millipore). EVs were isolated using the IZON qEV original 35 nm size exclusion column (Izon science) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. EVs were then concentrated as mentioned previously and resuspended in an equal volume of 4% PFA in PBS (2% PFA final). 20 µL drops of the resuspended exosomes were then absorbed for 20 min at RT on hydrophilic carbon-coated grids. After PBS rinses, grids were placed on drops of 1% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 5 min. Several washes were done with distilled water, and grids were then transferred on a filtered drop of pH7 uranyl-oxalate solution, for 5 min in the dark. Grids were then transferred in drops of filtered 4% aqueous uranyl acetate/2,3 M methylcellulose (1 V for 9 V) on a petri dish covered with parafilm on ice for 10 min in the dark. Grids were then removed, one at time, with a stainless-steel loop, and excess fluid were blotted by gently touching the edge of the loop with a Whatman No. 1 filter paper. Grids were air-dried while still on the loop, torn off, and stored in a grid storage box. Observations were done with a TEM Hitachi H7650 at 80kV equipped with a Gatan Orius camera.

Label-free quantitative proteomics

Request a detailed protocol

Three independent biological replicates were performed on total protein extracts from human HepG2 cells transfected with control siRNA or ß-catenin mutated siRNA. 10 μg of proteins were loaded on a 10% acrylamide SDS-PAGE gel and proteins were visualized by Colloidal Blue staining. Migration was stopped when samples had just entered the resolving gel and the unresolved region of the gel was cut into only one segment. The steps of sample preparation and protein digestion by the trypsin were performed as previously described (Campion et al., 2021). NanoLC-MS/MS analysis were performed using an Ultimate 3000 RSLC Nano-UPHLC system (Thermo Scientific, USA) coupled to a nanospray Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, California, USA). Each peptide extract was loaded on a 300 μm ID × 5 mm PepMap C18 precolumn (Thermo Scientific, USA) at a flow rate of 10 μL/min. After a 3 min desalting step, peptides were separated on a 50 cm EasySpray column (75 μm ID, 2 μm C18 beads, 100 Å pore size, ES903, Thermo Fisher Scientific) with a 4–40% linear gradient of solvent B (0.1% formic acid in 80% ACN) in 57 min. The separation flow rate was set at 300 nL/min. The mass spectrometer operated in positive ion mode at a 2.0 kV needle voltage. Data were acquired using Xcalibur 4.4 software in a data-dependent mode. MS scans (m/z 375–1500) were recorded at a resolution of R=120,000 (@ m/z 200), a standard AGC target, and an injection time in automatic mode, followed by a top speed duty cycle of up to 3 s for MS/MS acquisition. Precursor ions (2–7 charge states) were isolated in the quadrupole with a mass window of 1.6 Th and fragmented with HCD@28% normalized collision energy. MS/MS data was acquired in the ion trap with rapid scan mode, a 20% normalized AGC target, and a maximum injection time in dynamic mode. Selected precursors were excluded for 60 s. Protein identification was done in Proteome Discoverer 2.5. Mascot 2.5 algorithm was used for protein identification in batch mode by searching against a Uniprot Homo sapiens database (75,793 entries, released September 3, 2020). Two missed enzyme cleavages were allowed for the trypsin. Mass tolerances in MS and MS/MS were set to 10 ppm and 0.6 Da. Oxidation (M) and acetylation (K) were searched as dynamic modifications and carbamidomethylation (C) as static modifications. Raw LC-MS/MS data were imported in Proline Studio for feature detection, alignment, and quantification (Bouyssié et al., 2020). Protein identification was accepted only with at least two specific peptides with a pretty rank = 1 and with a protein FDR value less than 1.0% calculated using the ‘decoy’ option in Mascot. Label-free quantification of MS1 level by extracted ion chromatograms (XIC) was carried out with parameters indicated previously. The normalization was carried out on median of ratios. The inference of missing values was applied with 5% of the background noise. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (Deutsch et al., 2023) partner repository with the dataset identifier: PXD043841.

Immunofluorescence

Request a detailed protocol

Cultured cells were fixed with 4% PFA for 10 min, permeabilized with Triton-X100 0.1% (Sigma) for 10 min, and incubated in 4% BSA-PBS for 15 min to prevent non-specific binding. Cells were then incubated at room temperature with primary antibodies (diluted in 4% BSA-PBS) for 45 min and with secondary antibodies (1:200 diluted in 4% BSA-PBS) for 30 min. The following primary antibodies were used: ß-catenin (1:400, mouse, 610154, BD Biosciences), Rab27a (1:800, rabbit, 69295, Cell signaling), SDC4 (1:200, rabbit, 12236, Cell signaling). The following secondary antibodies were used: 547 H donkey anti-mouse IgG (H&L) (FP-SB4110-T, Interchim) and 547 H donkey anti-rabbit IgG (H&L) (FP-SB5110, Interchim). Nuclei were stained with Hoechst (1:1000, 34580, Sigma) and actin was stained with 488 phalloidin (1:200, FP-YE5180, Interchim). Coverslips were mounted on microscope slides using Fluoromount-G mounting media (SouthernBiotech) and were imaged under epifluorescence microscope (Zeiss) using the 63 X oil immersion objective and SP5 confocal microscope (Leica). Images were analyzed using ImageJ software.

Immunohistochemistry

Human samples

Request a detailed protocol

The total number of human HCC samples is 56 and has been provided by 2 cohorts obtained at different times (Figure 5—figure supplement 2). Experiments for each cohort have been performed by two different experimenters (cohort 1: NDS, cohort 2: IM) and using two different batches of Rab27a antibody.

Experiment

Request a detailed protocol

Paraffin-embedded human HCC samples were cut into 3.5 µm thick tissue sections and processed for immunohistochemistry with the EnVision FLEX kit material (K800021-2, Agilent Dako) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, tissue sections were put on slides (TOM-1190, Matsunami) and placed on automatic staining racks at room temperature to be deparaffinized. Slides were immersed in a 75 °C pre-warmed Target Retrieval Solution Low pH (50 x) (K8005) in the Dako PTlink tank. The tank was then heated up to 95 °C, slides were incubated for 20 min and allowed to cool to 75 °C. Afterwards, tumor sections were soaked for 5–10 min in Dako Wash Buffer. Slides were placed on the automatic staining racks of the Dako Autostainer and peroxidase blocking reagent was added for 10 min. Sections were rinsed with Dako Wash Buffer and antibodies were applied for 45 min according to the following dilutions (Dako Antibody Diluent): Glutamine synthetase (1:400, pH6, mouse, 610517, BD Biosciences), Rab27a (1:100, pH6, rabbit, 69295, Cell Signalling), SDC4 (1:200, pH6, P11820-1-A, Proteintech). Two solutions were then applied to the slides with washing with Dako Wash Buffer before and between each application: HorseRadish Peroxidase for 20 min and substrate working solution. Finally, slides were rinsed with water and hematoxyline counterstaining was performed before mounting on coverslips (Eukitt classic mounting medium).

Total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) imaging and analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Coverslips were placed in an imaging chamber, perfused at 37 °C with Hepes Buffer Saline (HBS) solution (135 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 0.4 mM MgCl2, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 1 mM D-glucose, and 20 mM HEPES) and were adjusted to pH 7.4 and to 305 mOsm. Imaging was performed with an Olympus IX83 inverted microscope equipped for (TIRF) microscopy with a 100x, 1.49 NA objective (UAPON100XOTIRF), a laser source (Cobolt Laser 06-DPL 473 nm, 100 mW), and an ILas2 illuminator (Gataca Systems) with a penetration depth set to 100 nm. Emitted fluorescence was filtered with a dichroic mirror (R405/488/561/635) and an emission filter (ET525/50 m, Chroma Technology) and recorded by an electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) camera (QuantEM 512 C, Teledyne Photometrics). Movies were acquired for 2 min at 10 Hz for exocytosis. To achieve good signal/noise ratio required for event detection and further analysis, fluorescence was bleached by high laser power illumination prior to acquisition of the full movie. MetaMorph 7.8 software was used for all acquisitions. Semi-automatic detection of exocytic events and their quantification were conducted using custom-made MATLAB scripts previously described (Jullie et al., 2014; Sposini et al., 2017; Bakr et al., 2021).

Bioinformatic analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Public transcriptomic data of 366 HCC patient samples were provided from the Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, downloaded from the cBioPortal site, and divided into two groups according to the presence or not of CTNNB1 hotspot mutations (respectively, 94 and 272 samples per group) by Genome data. Public transcriptomic data of 56 HCC patient samples were provided from the (Boyault et al., 2007) article and divided into two groups according to the presence or not of CTNNB1 mutations (respectively, 17 and 39 samples per group).

Statistical analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM and are representative of at least three experiments. Statistical tests were carried out using GraphPad Prism software version 8.0.2 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical significance (p<0.05 or less) was determined using Student’s t-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA). Values of p are indicated as follows: *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001; ns, non-significant.

Data availability

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier: PXD043841.

The following data sets were generated
    1. Dupuy JW
    2. Billottet C
    (2024) PRIDE
    ID PXD043841. Proteomic analysis of HepG2 cells after mutated ß-catenin depletion.
    https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/archive/projects/PXD043841
The following previously published data sets were used
    1. Gest C
    2. Sena S
    3. Dembele D
    4. Moreau V
    (2023) NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus
    ID GSE144107. Dual-function of beta-catenin in human tumor hepatocytes.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE144107

References

    1. Théry C
    2. Witwer KW
    3. Aikawa E
    4. Alcaraz MJ
    5. Anderson JD
    6. Andriantsitohaina R
    7. Antoniou A
    8. Arab T
    9. Archer F
    10. Atkin-Smith GK
    11. Ayre DC
    12. Bach JM
    13. Bachurski D
    14. Baharvand H
    15. Balaj L
    16. Baldacchino S
    17. Bauer NN
    18. Baxter AA
    19. Bebawy M
    20. Beckham C
    21. Bedina Zavec A
    22. Benmoussa A
    23. Berardi AC
    24. Bergese P
    25. Bielska E
    26. Blenkiron C
    27. Bobis-Wozowicz S
    28. Boilard E
    29. Boireau W
    30. Bongiovanni A
    31. Borràs FE
    32. Bosch S
    33. Boulanger CM
    34. Breakefield X
    35. Breglio AM
    36. Brennan MÁ
    37. Brigstock DR
    38. Brisson A
    39. Broekman ML
    40. Bromberg JF
    41. Bryl-Górecka P
    42. Buch S
    43. Buck AH
    44. Burger D
    45. Busatto S
    46. Buschmann D
    47. Bussolati B
    48. Buzás EI
    49. Byrd JB
    50. Camussi G
    51. Carter DR
    52. Caruso S
    53. Chamley LW
    54. Chang YT
    55. Chen C
    56. Chen S
    57. Cheng L
    58. Chin AR
    59. Clayton A
    60. Clerici SP
    61. Cocks A
    62. Cocucci E
    63. Coffey RJ
    64. Cordeiro-da-Silva A
    65. Couch Y
    66. Coumans FA
    67. Coyle B
    68. Crescitelli R
    69. Criado MF
    70. D’Souza-Schorey C
    71. Das S
    72. Datta Chaudhuri A
    73. de Candia P
    74. De Santana EF
    75. De Wever O
    76. Del Portillo HA
    77. Demaret T
    78. Deville S
    79. Devitt A
    80. Dhondt B
    81. Di Vizio D
    82. Dieterich LC
    83. Dolo V
    84. Dominguez Rubio AP
    85. Dominici M
    86. Dourado MR
    87. Driedonks TA
    88. Duarte FV
    89. Duncan HM
    90. Eichenberger RM
    91. Ekström K
    92. El Andaloussi S
    93. Elie-Caille C
    94. Erdbrügger U
    95. Falcón-Pérez JM
    96. Fatima F
    97. Fish JE
    98. Flores-Bellver M
    99. Försönits A
    100. Frelet-Barrand A
    101. Fricke F
    102. Fuhrmann G
    103. Gabrielsson S
    104. Gámez-Valero A
    105. Gardiner C
    106. Gärtner K
    107. Gaudin R
    108. Gho YS
    109. Giebel B
    110. Gilbert C
    111. Gimona M
    112. Giusti I
    113. Goberdhan DC
    114. Görgens A
    115. Gorski SM
    116. Greening DW
    117. Gross JC
    118. Gualerzi A
    119. Gupta GN
    120. Gustafson D
    121. Handberg A
    122. Haraszti RA
    123. Harrison P
    124. Hegyesi H
    125. Hendrix A
    126. Hill AF
    127. Hochberg FH
    128. Hoffmann KF
    129. Holder B
    130. Holthofer H
    131. Hosseinkhani B
    132. Hu G
    133. Huang Y
    134. Huber V
    135. Hunt S
    136. Ibrahim AGE
    137. Ikezu T
    138. Inal JM
    139. Isin M
    140. Ivanova A
    141. Jackson HK
    142. Jacobsen S
    143. Jay SM
    144. Jayachandran M
    145. Jenster G
    146. Jiang L
    147. Johnson SM
    148. Jones JC
    149. Jong A
    150. Jovanovic-Talisman T
    151. Jung S
    152. Kalluri R
    153. Kano SI
    154. Kaur S
    155. Kawamura Y
    156. Keller ET
    157. Khamari D
    158. Khomyakova E
    159. Khvorova A
    160. Kierulf P
    161. Kim KP
    162. Kislinger T
    163. Klingeborn M
    164. Klinke DJ
    165. Kornek M
    166. Kosanović MM
    167. Kovács ÁF
    168. Krämer-Albers EM
    169. Krasemann S
    170. Krause M
    171. Kurochkin IV
    172. Kusuma GD
    173. Kuypers S
    174. Laitinen S
    175. Langevin SM
    176. Languino LR
    177. Lannigan J
    178. Lässer C
    179. Laurent LC
    180. Lavieu G
    181. Lázaro-Ibáñez E
    182. Le Lay S
    183. Lee MS
    184. Lee YXF
    185. Lemos DS
    186. Lenassi M
    187. Leszczynska A
    188. Li IT
    189. Liao K
    190. Libregts SF
    191. Ligeti E
    192. Lim R
    193. Lim SK
    194. Linē A
    195. Linnemannstöns K
    196. Llorente A
    197. Lombard CA
    198. Lorenowicz MJ
    199. Lörincz ÁM
    200. Lötvall J
    201. Lovett J
    202. Lowry MC
    203. Loyer X
    204. Lu Q
    205. Lukomska B
    206. Lunavat TR
    207. Maas SL
    208. Malhi H
    209. Marcilla A
    210. Mariani J
    211. Mariscal J
    212. Martens-Uzunova ES
    213. Martin-Jaular L
    214. Martinez MC
    215. Martins VR
    216. Mathieu M
    217. Mathivanan S
    218. Maugeri M
    219. McGinnis LK
    220. McVey MJ
    221. Meckes DG
    222. Meehan KL
    223. Mertens I
    224. Minciacchi VR
    225. Möller A
    226. Møller Jørgensen M
    227. Morales-Kastresana A
    228. Morhayim J
    229. Mullier F
    230. Muraca M
    231. Musante L
    232. Mussack V
    233. Muth DC
    234. Myburgh KH
    235. Najrana T
    236. Nawaz M
    237. Nazarenko I
    238. Nejsum P
    239. Neri C
    240. Neri T
    241. Nieuwland R
    242. Nimrichter L
    243. Nolan JP
    244. Nolte-’t Hoen EN
    245. Noren Hooten N
    246. O’Driscoll L
    247. O’Grady T
    248. O’Loghlen A
    249. Ochiya T
    250. Olivier M
    251. Ortiz A
    252. Ortiz LA
    253. Osteikoetxea X
    254. Østergaard O
    255. Ostrowski M
    256. Park J
    257. Pegtel DM
    258. Peinado H
    259. Perut F
    260. Pfaffl MW
    261. Phinney DG
    262. Pieters BC
    263. Pink RC
    264. Pisetsky DS
    265. Pogge von Strandmann E
    266. Polakovicova I
    267. Poon IK
    268. Powell BH
    269. Prada I
    270. Pulliam L
    271. Quesenberry P
    272. Radeghieri A
    273. Raffai RL
    274. Raimondo S
    275. Rak J
    276. Ramirez MI
    277. Raposo G
    278. Rayyan MS
    279. Regev-Rudzki N
    280. Ricklefs FL
    281. Robbins PD
    282. Roberts DD
    283. Rodrigues SC
    284. Rohde E
    285. Rome S
    286. Rouschop KM
    287. Rughetti A
    288. Russell AE
    289. Saá P
    290. Sahoo S
    291. Salas-Huenuleo E
    292. Sánchez C
    293. Saugstad JA
    294. Saul MJ
    295. Schiffelers RM
    296. Schneider R
    297. Schøyen TH
    298. Scott A
    299. Shahaj E
    300. Sharma S
    301. Shatnyeva O
    302. Shekari F
    303. Shelke GV
    304. Shetty AK
    305. Shiba K
    306. Siljander PRM
    307. Silva AM
    308. Skowronek A
    309. Snyder OL
    310. Soares RP
    311. Sódar BW
    312. Soekmadji C
    313. Sotillo J
    314. Stahl PD
    315. Stoorvogel W
    316. Stott SL
    317. Strasser EF
    318. Swift S
    319. Tahara H
    320. Tewari M
    321. Timms K
    322. Tiwari S
    323. Tixeira R
    324. Tkach M
    325. Toh WS
    326. Tomasini R
    327. Torrecilhas AC
    328. Tosar JP
    329. Toxavidis V
    330. Urbanelli L
    331. Vader P
    332. van Balkom BW
    333. van der Grein SG
    334. Van Deun J
    335. van Herwijnen MJ
    336. Van Keuren-Jensen K
    337. van Niel G
    338. van Royen ME
    339. van Wijnen AJ
    340. Vasconcelos MH
    341. Vechetti IJ
    342. Veit TD
    343. Vella LJ
    344. Velot É
    345. Verweij FJ
    346. Vestad B
    347. Viñas JL
    348. Visnovitz T
    349. Vukman KV
    350. Wahlgren J
    351. Watson DC
    352. Wauben MH
    353. Weaver A
    354. Webber JP
    355. Weber V
    356. Wehman AM
    357. Weiss DJ
    358. Welsh JA
    359. Wendt S
    360. Wheelock AM
    361. Wiener Z
    362. Witte L
    363. Wolfram J
    364. Xagorari A
    365. Xander P
    366. Xu J
    367. Yan X
    368. Yáñez-Mó M
    369. Yin H
    370. Yuana Y
    371. Zappulli V
    372. Zarubova J
    373. Žėkas V
    374. Zhang JY
    375. Zhao Z
    376. Zheng L
    377. Zheutlin AR
    378. Zickler AM
    379. Zimmermann P
    380. Zivkovic AM
    381. Zocco D
    382. Zuba-Surma EK
    (2018) Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines
    Journal of Extracellular Vesicles 7:1535750.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Camille Dantzer

    Université de Bordeaux, INSERM, U1312, BRIC, Bordeaux, France
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  2. Justine Vaché

    Université de Bordeaux, INSERM, U1312, BRIC, Bordeaux, France
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  3. Aude Brunel

    Université de Limoges, INSERM, U1308, CAPTuR, Limoges, France
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  4. Isabelle Mahouche

    Université de Bordeaux, INSERM, U1312, BRIC, Bordeaux, France
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  5. Anne-Aurélie Raymond

    1. Université de Bordeaux, INSERM, U1312, BRIC, Bordeaux, France
    2. Plateforme OncoProt, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, TBM-Core, US5, UAR3457, Bordeaux, France
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  6. Jean-William Dupuy

    1. Plateforme OncoProt, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, TBM-Core, US5, UAR3457, Bordeaux, France
    2. Plateforme Protéome, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux Proteome, Bordeaux, France
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2448-4797

  7. Melina Petrel

    Bordeaux Imaging Center, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, BIC, Bordeaux, France
    Contribution
    Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  8. Paulette Bioulac-Sage

    Université de Bordeaux, INSERM, U1312, BRIC, Bordeaux, France
    Contribution
    Resources
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  9. David Perrais

    Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, IINS, Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Contribution
    Software, Formal analysis, Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5878-5408

  10. Nathalie Dugot-Senant

    Plateforme d'histologie, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, TBM-Core, US5, UAR3457, Bordeaux, France
    Contribution
    Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  11. Mireille Verdier

    Université de Limoges, INSERM, U1308, CAPTuR, Limoges, France
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  12. Barbara Bessette

    Université de Limoges, INSERM, U1308, CAPTuR, Limoges, France
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  13. Clotilde Billottet

    Université de Bordeaux, INSERM, U1312, BRIC, Bordeaux, France
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Contributed equally with
    Violaine Moreau
    For correspondence
    clotilde.billottet@u-bordeaux.fr
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1819-984X

  14. Violaine Moreau

    Université de Bordeaux, INSERM, U1312, BRIC, Bordeaux, France
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Contributed equally with
    Clotilde Billottet
    For correspondence
    violaine.moreau@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4513-7022

Funding

Ligue Contre le Cancer (Comités Charentes et Gironde)

  • Clotilde Billottet

Ministère de l'Education Nationale, de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche (PhD Student Fellowship)

  • Justine Vaché

Association Française pour l'Etude du Foie (AAP research project 2022)

  • Clotilde Billottet

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (DEQ20180839586)

  • Violaine Moreau

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank the FACSility, OneCell, Histopathologie, and Oncoprot facility platforms (TBMCore, US5, Bordeaux) for the help with flow cytometry, qPCR, immunohistochemistry, and mass spectrometry experiments. We acknowledge Cyril Dourthe for his help in the bioinformatic analysis. We thank Silvia Sposini (IINS, Bordeaux) for her help in the TIRF microscopy experiments. We thank Drs. Sara Basbous and Benjamin Bonnard (BRIC, Bordeaux) for helpful discussions on the project. We are grateful to Drs. Jean-Christophe Delpech, Liam Barry-Carroll (NutriNeuro Laboratory, Bordeaux), and Alexandre Favereaux (IINS, Bordeaux) for insightful discussions about EVs. We acknowledge the Bordeaux Imaging Center (Bordeaux, France) and the France BioImaging infrastructure supported by the French National Research Agency (ANR-10-INSB-04, 'Investments for the future'). We thank Professor William A Thomas (Colby-Sawyer College, New Hampshire) for proof-reading the manuscript. CD is supported by a PhD fellowship from both SIRIC BRIO and Région Nouvelle-Aquitaine. JV is supported by PhD scholarships from the French Ministry of Research (MENESR). This research was funded by La Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale to VM (équipe FRM 2018, grant number DEQ20180839586), La Ligue contre le Cancer (comité des Charentes et comité de la Gironde) to CB and l’AFEF (Association Française de l’Etude du Foie) to CB. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Ethics

Human sample data collection, analysis and archiving are in accordance with French data protection laws. The data processing is also in accordance with the MR-004 Reference Methodology for which the Bordeaux university hospital and INSERM have signed a compliance agreement under number PV2022_353.

Version history

  1. Sent for peer review:
  2. Preprint posted:
  3. Reviewed Preprint version 1:
  4. Reviewed Preprint version 2:
  5. Version of Record published:

Cite all versions

You can cite all versions using the DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.95191. This DOI represents all versions, and will always resolve to the latest one.

Copyright

© 2024, Dantzer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,198
    views
  • 121
    downloads
  • 2
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Camille Dantzer
  2. Justine Vaché
  3. Aude Brunel
  4. Isabelle Mahouche
  5. Anne-Aurélie Raymond
  6. Jean-William Dupuy
  7. Melina Petrel
  8. Paulette Bioulac-Sage
  9. David Perrais
  10. Nathalie Dugot-Senant
  11. Mireille Verdier
  12. Barbara Bessette
  13. Clotilde Billottet
  14. Violaine Moreau
(2024)
Emerging role of oncogenic ß-catenin in exosome biogenesis as a driver of immune escape in hepatocellular carcinoma
eLife 13:RP95191.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.95191.3

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.95191

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology

    Exosomes: How tumors escape the immune system

    Stefanie Schmieder
    Insight

    Mutations in the gene for β-catenin cause liver cancer cells to release fewer exosomes, which reduces the number of immune cells infiltrating the tumor.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology

    Automated workflow for the cell cycle analysis of (non-)adherent cells using a machine learning approach

    Kourosh Hayatigolkhatmi, Chiara Soriani ... Simona Rodighiero
    Tools and Resources

    Understanding the cell cycle at the single-cell level is crucial for cellular biology and cancer research. While current methods using fluorescent markers have improved the study of adherent cells, non-adherent cells remain challenging. In this study, we addressed this gap by combining a specialized surface to enhance cell attachment, the FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image analysis pipeline, and a custom machine learning algorithm. This approach enabled precise measurement of cell cycle phase durations in non-adherent cells. This method was validated in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics, and we tested the impact of cell cycle-modulating drugs on NB4 cells. Our cell cycle analysis system, which is also compatible with adherent cells, is fully automated and freely available, providing detailed insights from hundreds of cells under various conditions. This report presents a valuable tool for advancing cancer research and drug development by enabling comprehensive, automated cell cycle analysis in both adherent and non-adherent cells.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology

    Luminal epithelial cells integrate variable responses to aging into stereotypical changes that underlie breast cancer susceptibility

    Rosalyn W Sayaman, Masaru Miyano ... Mark LaBarge
    Research Article

    Effects from aging in single cells are heterogenous, whereas at the organ- and tissue-levels aging phenotypes tend to appear as stereotypical changes. The mammary epithelium is a bilayer of two major phenotypically and functionally distinct cell lineages: luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells. Mammary luminal epithelia exhibit substantial stereotypical changes with age that merit attention because these cells are the putative cells-of-origin for breast cancers. We hypothesize that effects from aging that impinge upon maintenance of lineage fidelity increase susceptibility to cancer initiation. We generated and analyzed transcriptomes from primary luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells from younger <30 (y)ears old and older >55y women. In addition to age-dependent directional changes in gene expression, we observed increased transcriptional variance with age that contributed to genome-wide loss of lineage fidelity. Age-dependent variant responses were common to both lineages, whereas directional changes were almost exclusively detected in luminal epithelia and involved altered regulation of chromatin and genome organizers such as SATB1. Epithelial expression of gap junction protein GJB6 increased with age, and modulation of GJB6 expression in heterochronous co-cultures revealed that it provided a communication conduit from myoepithelial cells that drove directional change in luminal cells. Age-dependent luminal transcriptomes comprised a prominent signal that could be detected in bulk tissue during aging and transition into cancers. A machine learning classifier based on luminal-specific aging distinguished normal from cancer tissue and was highly predictive of breast cancer subtype. We speculate that luminal epithelia are the ultimate site of integration of the variant responses to aging in their surrounding tissue, and that their emergent phenotype both endows cells with the ability to become cancer-cells-of-origin and represents a biosensor that presages cancer susceptibility.