Exosomes: How tumors escape the immune system
All cells in the body release small nano-sized vesicles known as exosomes into the space around them. These vesicles contain a diverse array of biological materials, such as nucleic acids, proteins, lipids and other metabolites that represent the ‘parent cell’ they came from (Figure 1A).
When exosomes were first discovered in 1981, they were thought to just be another mechanism cells use to relieve themselves of unwanted materials (Trams et al., 1981; Johnstone et al., 1987; Harding et al., 1983; Kucharzewska et al., 2013). However, more recently exosomes have emerged as important players in how cells communicate with each other, even when they are far apart. Exosomes released from the parent cell are taken up by or fused into the membrane of a recipient cell. This delivery of active biological material can influence the behavior of the recipient cell, such as the genes it expresses and how it responds to stimuli (Valadi et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2014).
In cancer, for example, exosomes released from tumor cells have been shown to promote drug resistance and the local formation of blood vessels (Hu et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2014; Qu et al., 2016). They can also mediate how cancer cells interact with the immune system, such as impairing how immune cells detect and target cancerous cells (Liu et al., 2020; Kalluri and LeBleu, 2020; Ning et al., 2018; Mathieu et al., 2019). Despite these advances, however, much remains unknown about the role exosomes play in cancer and, importantly, what regulates exosome secretion in the parent cell. Now, in eLife, Clotilde Billottet, Violaine Moreau and co-workers – including Camille Dantzer as first author – report how mutations in the gene for β-catenin affect how liver cancer cells secrete exosomes and, in turn, the recruitment of immune cells to the tumor (Dantzer et al., 2024).
Many tumors carry mutations in the gene for β-catenin, including around 30–40% of tumors associated with a type of liver cancer called hepatocellular carcinoma (de L Coste et al., 1998; Rebouissou et al., 2016). This group of tumors has an important unifying feature: they cannot be infiltrated by cells of the immune system, and are therefore resistant to immunotherapy. But it was unclear what was causing this effect.
To investigate, Dantzer et al. (who are based at the University of Bordeaux and University of Limoges) studied a cell-based model of hepatocellular carcinoma in which the mutant β-catenin (also known as oncogenic β-catenin) had been silenced. They found that this increased the expression of genes involved in generating and secreting exosomes (Figure 1B). It also restored the number of exosomes secreted from the cancer cells, suggesting that oncogenic β-catenin represses the secretion of these vesicles.
To better understand the molecular mechanism at play, Dantzer et al. focused their study on two genes that are downregulated when oncogenic β-catenin is present: one of these genes codes for the small GTPase Rab27a, and the other codes for the receptor protein syndecan-4. Further experiments showed that these two genes are repressed in multiple cell models of liver cancer carrying oncogenic β-catenin. This correlation was also observed in tissue samples from patients with liver cancer, where the presence of oncogenic β-catenin corresponded with fewer transcripts of both Rab27a and syndecan-4.
Dantzer et al. also conducted experiments in a cell model of liver cancer in which β-catenin is not mutated. They found that activating the β-catenin pathway decreased the expression of the genes for Rab27a and syndecan-4, thus resulting in reduced exosome secretion. This suggests that β-catenin may be a master regulator of exosome machinery.
Finally, Dantzer et al. investigated the functional consequence of secreting fewer exosomes. To do this, they studied three dimensional models of hepatocellular carcinoma in which the gene for Rab27a had been depleted. The concomitant loss of exosomes resulted in a marked decrease in immune cells infiltrating the tumor models.
While it is still unclear how exosomes derived from liver cancer cells affect the immune system, this elegant study provides important mechanistic information about why immune cells struggle to infiltrate these tumors. However, there are many questions that remain to be answered. For instance, it is unclear if the exosomes secreted from cancer cells carrying oncogenic β-catenin contain the same materials as those secreted from cancer cells containing the non-mutated version of the gene. It is possible that the exosomes released from the cancer cells are transporting tumor-associated antigens that are required to stimulate an immune response. Perhaps most importantly it remains to be seen how general this mechanism of exosome regulation is, and whether β-catenin regulates exosome secretion in other contexts as well. Answering these questions may provide new treatment avenues for diseases in which exosome secretion has been blocked, or is harming tissues and cells.
References
-
Receptor-mediated endocytosis of transferrin and recycling of the transferrin receptor in rat reticulocytesThe Journal of Cell Biology 97:329–339.https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.97.2.329
-
Vesicle formation during reticulocyte maturation. Association of plasma membrane activities with released vesicles (exosomes)The Journal of Biological Chemistry 262:9412–9420.
-
Exosomes: From garbage bins to translational medicineInternational Journal of Pharmaceutics 583:119333.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119333
-
Exfoliation of membrane ecto-enzymes in the form of micro-vesiclesBiochimica et Biophysica Acta 645:63–70.https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2736(81)90512-5
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2024, Schmieder
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,124
- views
-
- 122
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Cancer Biology
- Cell Biology
Understanding the cell cycle at the single-cell level is crucial for cellular biology and cancer research. While current methods using fluorescent markers have improved the study of adherent cells, non-adherent cells remain challenging. In this study, we addressed this gap by combining a specialized surface to enhance cell attachment, the FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image analysis pipeline, and a custom machine learning algorithm. This approach enabled precise measurement of cell cycle phase durations in non-adherent cells. This method was validated in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics, and we tested the impact of cell cycle-modulating drugs on NB4 cells. Our cell cycle analysis system, which is also compatible with adherent cells, is fully automated and freely available, providing detailed insights from hundreds of cells under various conditions. This report presents a valuable tool for advancing cancer research and drug development by enabling comprehensive, automated cell cycle analysis in both adherent and non-adherent cells.
-
- Cancer Biology
- Computational and Systems Biology
Effects from aging in single cells are heterogenous, whereas at the organ- and tissue-levels aging phenotypes tend to appear as stereotypical changes. The mammary epithelium is a bilayer of two major phenotypically and functionally distinct cell lineages: luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells. Mammary luminal epithelia exhibit substantial stereotypical changes with age that merit attention because these cells are the putative cells-of-origin for breast cancers. We hypothesize that effects from aging that impinge upon maintenance of lineage fidelity increase susceptibility to cancer initiation. We generated and analyzed transcriptomes from primary luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells from younger <30 (y)ears old and older >55y women. In addition to age-dependent directional changes in gene expression, we observed increased transcriptional variance with age that contributed to genome-wide loss of lineage fidelity. Age-dependent variant responses were common to both lineages, whereas directional changes were almost exclusively detected in luminal epithelia and involved altered regulation of chromatin and genome organizers such as SATB1. Epithelial expression of gap junction protein GJB6 increased with age, and modulation of GJB6 expression in heterochronous co-cultures revealed that it provided a communication conduit from myoepithelial cells that drove directional change in luminal cells. Age-dependent luminal transcriptomes comprised a prominent signal that could be detected in bulk tissue during aging and transition into cancers. A machine learning classifier based on luminal-specific aging distinguished normal from cancer tissue and was highly predictive of breast cancer subtype. We speculate that luminal epithelia are the ultimate site of integration of the variant responses to aging in their surrounding tissue, and that their emergent phenotype both endows cells with the ability to become cancer-cells-of-origin and represents a biosensor that presages cancer susceptibility.