Near-infrared photoactivatable control of Ca2+ signaling and optogenetic immunomodulation

  1. Lian He
  2. Yuanwei Zhang
  3. Guolin Ma
  4. Peng Tan
  5. Zhanjun Li
  6. Shengbing Zhang
  7. Xiang Wu
  8. Ji Jing
  9. Shaohai Fang
  10. Lijuan Zhou
  11. Youjun Wang
  12. Yun Huang
  13. Patrick Hogan
  14. Gang Han
  15. Yubin Zhou  Is a corresponding author
  1. Texas A&M University Health Science Center, United States
  2. University of Massachusetts Medical school, United States
  3. University of Massachusetts Medical School, United States
  4. Beijing Normal University, China
  5. La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, United States

Abstract

The application of current channelrhodopsin-based optogenetic tools is limited by the lack of strict ion selectivity and the inability to extend the spectra sensitivity into the near-infrared (NIR) tissue transmissible range. Here we present an NIR-stimulable optogenetic platform (termed "Opto-CRAC") that selectively and remotely controls Ca2+ oscillations and Ca2+-responsive gene expression to regulate the function of non-excitable cells, including T lymphocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells. When coupled to upconversion nanoparticles, the optogenetic operation window is shifted from the visible range to NIR wavelengths to enable wireless photoactivation of Ca2+-dependent signaling and optogenetic modulation of immunoinflammatory responses. In a mouse model of melanoma by using ovalbumin as surrogate tumor antigen, Opto-CRAC has been shown to act as a genetically-encoded "photoactivatable adjuvant" to improve antigen-specific immune responses to specifically destruct tumor cells. Our study represents a solid step forward towards the goal of achieving remote control of Ca2+-modulated activities with tailored function.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lian He

    Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Yuanwei Zhang

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical school, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Guolin Ma

    Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Peng Tan

    Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Zhanjun Li

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Shengbing Zhang

    Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Xiang Wu

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ji Jing

    Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Shaohai Fang

    Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Lijuan Zhou

    Beijing Key Laboratory of Gene Resource and Molecular Development, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Youjun Wang

    Beijing Key Laboratory of Gene Resource and Molecular Development, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yun Huang

    Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Patrick Hogan

    Division of Signaling and Gene Expression, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Gang Han

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Yubin Zhou

    Center for Translational Cancer Research, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, United States
    For correspondence
    yzhou@ibt.tamhsc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Richard Aldrich, The University of Texas at Austin, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Mice-related experiments were approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center (#12044 and #2014-0228-IBT; Houston, TX, USA; Animal Welfare Assurance Number A3893-01) and University of Massachusetts Medical School (#A-2512-15, Worcester, MA, USA; Animal Welfare Assurance Number A3306-01).

Version history

  1. Received: July 11, 2015
  2. Accepted: November 6, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 8, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 29, 2015 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: June 13, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2015, He et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 12,339
    views
  • 2,442
    downloads
  • 179
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lian He
  2. Yuanwei Zhang
  3. Guolin Ma
  4. Peng Tan
  5. Zhanjun Li
  6. Shengbing Zhang
  7. Xiang Wu
  8. Ji Jing
  9. Shaohai Fang
  10. Lijuan Zhou
  11. Youjun Wang
  12. Yun Huang
  13. Patrick Hogan
  14. Gang Han
  15. Yubin Zhou
(2015)
Near-infrared photoactivatable control of Ca2+ signaling and optogenetic immunomodulation
eLife 4:e10024.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10024

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10024

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Natalia E Ketaren, Fred D Mast ... John D Aitchison
    Research Advance

    To date, all major modes of monoclonal antibody therapy targeting SARS-CoV-2 have lost significant efficacy against the latest circulating variants. As SARS-CoV-2 omicron sublineages account for over 90% of COVID-19 infections, evasion of immune responses generated by vaccination or exposure to previous variants poses a significant challenge. A compelling new therapeutic strategy against SARS-CoV-2 is that of single-domain antibodies, termed nanobodies, which address certain limitations of monoclonal antibodies. Here, we demonstrate that our high-affinity nanobody repertoire, generated against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Mast et al., 2021), remains effective against variants of concern, including omicron BA.4/BA.5; a subset is predicted to counter resistance in emerging XBB and BQ.1.1 sublineages. Furthermore, we reveal the synergistic potential of nanobody cocktails in neutralizing emerging variants. Our study highlights the power of nanobody technology as a versatile therapeutic and diagnostic tool to combat rapidly evolving infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Benjamin R Duewell, Naomi E Wilson ... Scott D Hansen
    Research Article

    Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) beta (PI3Kβ) is functionally unique in the ability to integrate signals derived from receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), G-protein coupled receptors, and Rho-family GTPases. The mechanism by which PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with various membrane-tethered signaling inputs, however, remains unclear. Previous experiments did not determine whether interactions with membrane-tethered proteins primarily control PI3Kβ localization versus directly modulate lipid kinase activity. To address this gap in our knowledge, we established an assay to directly visualize how three distinct protein interactions regulate PI3Kβ when presented to the kinase in a biologically relevant configuration on supported lipid bilayers. Using single molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy, we determined the mechanism controlling PI3Kβ membrane localization, prioritization of signaling inputs, and lipid kinase activation. We find that auto-inhibited PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with RTK-derived tyrosine phosphorylated (pY) peptides before engaging either GβGγ or Rac1(GTP). Although pY peptides strongly localize PI3Kβ to membranes, stimulation of lipid kinase activity is modest. In the presence of either pY/GβGγ or pY/Rac1(GTP), PI3Kβ activity is dramatically enhanced beyond what can be explained by simply increasing membrane localization. Instead, PI3Kβ is synergistically activated by pY/GβGγ and pY/Rac1 (GTP) through a mechanism consistent with allosteric regulation.