Axons: The cost of communication in the brain
Imaging ATP in axons reveals that they rely on glucose from the blood and lactate produced by glial cells as sources of energy.
- University of British Columbia, Canada
Although metabolism is considered to be a dull subject by some, it is vital to life. The metabolic processes that convert food into energy are particularly important for the brain: although it accounts for just 2% of total body weight, the brain is responsible for 20% of the body’s total energy expenditure. Most of this energy comes from adenosine triphosphate (or ATP for short), which the body produces by metabolizing glucose and oxygen.
The neurons in the brain are made up of four distinct parts: the dendrites, which receive information from other neurons at special structures called synapses; the cell body, where the nucleus and genetic material are located; the axon, which carries information away from the cell; and the synapses at the end of the axon, where information is passed on to the dendrites of other neurons. The cell bodies, dendrites and synapses are located in the gray matter of the brain, while axons make up the white matter.
To use an analogy that may soon be redundant in the era of cell phones, axons are to neurons what telephone cables are to land-line phones. Like telephone cables, axons transmit information over long distances as electrical signals called action potentials (which are based on differences in the concentrations of certain ions inside and outside the neuron). There is usually a small voltage across the membrane of a neuron called a resting membrane potential. However, when a neuron is stimulated, various ions suddenly travel into or out of the neuron, changing this voltage and creating an action potential that travels along the axon. The efficiency with which information is communicated over long distances by complex networks is an impressive feature of our brains.
In humans, the white matter accounts for 50% of the brain volume (Laughlin and Sejnowski, 2003). The first signs of neurodegenerative diseases in the brain can often be seen in axons; a specific loss of axons in the white matter affects brain functions such as memory or vision, even though the cell bodies of neurons may still be intact. To better understand neurological diseases associated with degenerating axons and white matter lesions (Iadecola, 2013; Hirrlinger and Nave, 2014), it is important to quantify the amount of energy needed to fuel action potentials and axonal activity. Previous estimates based on glucose uptake measurements indicate that white matter consumes only one third of what gray matter requires.
Mathematical models suggest that the gray matter requires a lot of energy for synaptic transmission, which involves molecules called neurotransmitters traveling from a pre-synaptic neuron to a post-synaptic neuron (Attwell and Laughlin, 2001). Most of the energy in the white matter, however, is used for generating an action potential and subsequently reestablishing the resting membrane potential (Harris and Attwell, 2012). Yet, the energy use of the white matter is still poorly understood, as it has been difficult to measure the exact amount of ATP consumption during the generation of action potentials in the axons.
Now, in eLife, Johannes Hirrlinger, Klaus-Armin Nave and colleagues – including Andrea Trevisiol of the Max Planck Institute for Experimental Medicine as first author – report that they have used optical sensors to directly measure the ATP consumption required to power action potentials (Trevisiol et al., 2017) This new approach allowed them to do two things for the first time: to visualize the energy use of action potentials in real time, and to determine the metabolic source of the ATP. The experiments were performed on an adapted version of the mouse optic nerve, a well-established nerve model for white matter electrophysiology (Stys et al., 1991; Brown et al., 2003).
Trevisiol et al. first uncovered a remarkable correlation between ATP levels and the generation of action potentials. When action potentials were evoked more frequently, the ATP levels decreased, indicating that action potentials rapidly consume energy. On the other hand, when the ATP production was interrupted, action potentials in the axons declined and progressively failed, because they did not spread as effectively. However, the technique cannot determine the exact levels of energy consumption because their optical sensor cannot measure the absolute concentration of ATP.
Trevisiol et al. subsequently showed that axons rely on several sources of energy for ATP production. Although glucose from the blood is the principal source, the researchers were able to show that the axons also use lactate as an energy source. It is thought that glial cells called astrocytes, which are found in both white and gray matter, metabolize a form of glucose called glycogen to produce lactate (Brown et al., 2003; Suzuki et al., 2011). Other glial cells called oligodendrocytes can also supply lactate (which they produce by metabolizing glucose) (Fünfschilling et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2012). This suggests that a complex energy supply network in which multiple cell types and metabolic energy sources are used to maintain the ATP levels is crucial for axons to work properly.
This development of an imaging approach that can monitor changes in ATP levels is an important step in quantifying the metabolic costs of communication via white matter axons. It also gives us a clever insight into defining the important supporting roles of glia cells in maintaining the health of the white matter itself via the production of lactate.
References
-
An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brainJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 21:1133–1145.https://doi.org/10.1097/00004647-200110000-00001
-
Glycogen regulation and functional role in mouse white matterThe Journal of Physiology 549:501–512.https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2003.042416
-
The energetics of CNS white matterJournal of Neuroscience 32:356–371.https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3430-11.2012
Article and author information
Author details
Leigh Wicki-Stordeur
Louis-Philippe Bernier
Publication history
Copyright
© 2017, MacVicar et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 4,276
- views
-
- 356
- downloads
-
- 4
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Axons: The cost of communication in the brain
eLife 6:e27894.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27894
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Purkinje cell (PC) dendrites are optimized to integrate the vast cerebellar input array and drive the sole cortical output. PCs are classically seen as stereotypical computational units, yet mouse PCs are morphologically diverse and those with multi-branched structure can receive non-canonical climbing fiber (CF) multi-innervation that confers independent compartment-specific signaling. While otherwise uncharacterized, human PCs are universally multi-branched. Do they exceed allometry to achieve enhanced integrative capacities relative to mouse PCs? To answer this, we used several comparative histology techniques in adult human and mouse to analyze cellular morphology, parallel fiber (PF) and CF input arrangement, and regional PC demographics. Human PCs are substantially larger than previously described; they exceed allometric constraint by cortical thickness and are the largest neuron in the brain with 6–7 cm total dendritic length. Unlike mouse, human PC dendrites ramify horizontally to form a multi-compartment motif that we show can receive multiple CFs. Human spines are denser (6.9 vs 4.9 spines/μm), larger (~0.36 vs 0.29 μm), and include an unreported ‘spine cluster’ structure—features that may be congruent with enhanced PF association and amplification as human-specific adaptations. By extrapolation, human PCs may receive 500,000 to 1 million synaptic inputs compared with 30–40,000 in mouse. Collectively, human PC morphology and input arrangement is quantitatively and qualitatively distinct from rodent. Multi-branched PCs are more prevalent in posterior and lateral cerebellum, co-varying with functional boundaries, supporting the hypothesis that this morphological motif permits expanded input multiplexing and may subserve task-dependent needs for input association.
-
- Neuroscience
Adaptive behavior in complex environments critically relies on the ability to appropriately link specific choices or actions to their outcomes. However, the neural mechanisms that support the ability to credit only those past choices believed to have caused the observed outcomes remain unclear. Here, we leverage multivariate pattern analyses of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data and an adaptive learning task to shed light on the underlying neural mechanisms of such specific credit assignment. We find that the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC) and hippocampus (HC) code for the causal choice identity when credit needs to be assigned for choices that are separated from outcomes by a long delay, even when this delayed transition is punctuated by interim decisions. Further, we show when interim decisions must be made, learning is additionally supported by lateral frontopolar cortex (lFPC). Our results indicate that lFPC holds previous causal choices in a ‘pending’ state until a relevant outcome is observed, and the fidelity of these representations predicts the fidelity of subsequent causal choice representations in lOFC and HC during credit assignment. Together, these results highlight the importance of the timely reinstatement of specific causes in lOFC and HC in learning choice-outcome relationships when delays and choices intervene, a critical component of real-world learning and decision making.
