Re-examining how complexin inhibits neurotransmitter release: SNARE complex insertion or electrostatic hindrance?

  1. Thorsten Trimbuch
  2. Junjie Xu
  3. David Flaherty
  4. Diana R Tomchick
  5. Josep Rizo  Is a corresponding author
  6. Christian Rosenmund
  1. Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
  2. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States

Abstract

Complexins play activating and inhibitory functions in neurotransmitter release. The complexin accessory helix inhibits release and was proposed to insert into SNARE complexes to prevent their full assembly. This model was supported by 'superclamp' and 'poor-clamp' mutations that enhanced or decreased the complexin-I inhibitory activity in cell-cell fusion assays, and by the crystal structure of a superclamp mutant bound to a synaptobrevin-truncated SNARE complex. NMR studies now show that the complexin-I accessory helix does not insert into synaptobrevin-truncated SNARE complexes in solution, and electrophysiological data reveal that superclamp mutants have slightly stimulatory or no effects on neurotransmitter release, whereas a poor-clamp mutant inhibits release. Importantly, increasing or decreasing the negative charge of the complexin-I accessory helix inhibits or stimulates release, respectively. These results suggest a new model whereby the complexin accessory helix inhibits release through electrostatic (and perhaps steric) repulsion enabled by its location between the vesicle and plasma membranes.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Thorsten Trimbuch

    Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Junjie Xu

    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. David Flaherty

    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Diana R Tomchick

    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Josep Rizo

    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    For correspondence
    jose@arnie.swmed.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Christian Rosenmund

    Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    Christian Rosenmund, Reviewing editor, eLife.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Axel T Brunger, Stanford University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animals were handled according to the animal welfare committee of the Charit� Berlin, Germany. Time pregnant females were anesthetized and euthanized at E18 according to the german animal law ({section sign}4 section 1) and permit by the Berlin authorities (Landesamt f�r Gesundheit und Soziales, LaGeSo) under the permit number T0220/09.

Version history

  1. Received: January 24, 2014
  2. Accepted: May 6, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 8, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 3, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Trimbuch et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,359
    views
  • 302
    downloads
  • 69
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Thorsten Trimbuch
  2. Junjie Xu
  3. David Flaherty
  4. Diana R Tomchick
  5. Josep Rizo
  6. Christian Rosenmund
(2014)
Re-examining how complexin inhibits neurotransmitter release: SNARE complex insertion or electrostatic hindrance?
eLife 3:e02391.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02391

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02391

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Shyam S Krishnakumar, Feng Li ... Karin M Reinisch
    Short Report

    We have previously proposed that complexin cross-links multiple pre-fusion SNARE complexes via a trans interaction to function as a clamp on SNARE-mediated neurotransmitter release. A recent NMR study was unable to detect the trans clamping interaction of complexin and therefore questioned the previous interpretation of the fluorescence resonance energy transfer and isothermal titration calorimetry data on which the trans clamping model was originally based. Here we present new biochemical data that underscore the validity of our previous interpretation and the continued relevancy of the trans insertion model for complexin clamping.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Christian Galicia, Giambattista Guaitoli ... Wim Versées
    Research Article

    Roco proteins entered the limelight after mutations in human LRRK2 were identified as a major cause of familial Parkinson’s disease. LRRK2 is a large and complex protein combining a GTPase and protein kinase activity, and disease mutations increase the kinase activity, while presumably decreasing the GTPase activity. Although a cross-communication between both catalytic activities has been suggested, the underlying mechanisms and the regulatory role of the GTPase domain remain unknown. Several structures of LRRK2 have been reported, but structures of Roco proteins in their activated GTP-bound state are lacking. Here, we use single-particle cryo-electron microscopy to solve the structure of a bacterial Roco protein (CtRoco) in its GTP-bound state, aided by two conformation-specific nanobodies: NbRoco1 and NbRoco2. This structure presents CtRoco in an active monomeric state, featuring a very large GTP-induced conformational change using the LRR-Roc linker as a hinge. Furthermore, this structure shows how NbRoco1 and NbRoco2 collaborate to activate CtRoco in an allosteric way. Altogether, our data provide important new insights into the activation mechanism of Roco proteins, with relevance to LRRK2 regulation, and suggest new routes for the allosteric modulation of their GTPase activity.