Understanding how animals age may help us to prevent age-related or chronic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes and cancer. The tiny nematode worm known as C. elegans is widely used as a model to study aging and has enabled researchers to identify factors that can slow down the aging process. Like other animals, these worms contain female and male sex cells that originate from cells called germline stem cells. The normal lifespan of C. elegans is less than three weeks, but when the germline stem cells are removed, the worms can live for much longer.

Reproduction requires a lot of energy, which is typically ‘stored’ in molecules of fat. Animals utilize their fat reserves and release this energy by breaking the fat molecules down into smaller molecules as part of their ‘metabolism’. Worms that have had their germline stem cells removed have altered fat metabolism, and it is thought that this may contribute to their increased lifespan. These worms have increased levels of a protein called SKN-1, which alters fat metabolism and helps to protect cells from toxic molecules and other stresses.

SKN-1 works by regulating the activity (or ‘expression’) of many genes in cells, but it is not clear how this increases the lifespan of the worms. Steinbaugh et al. studied mutant worms that were lacking SKN-1. Unlike normal worms, when the germline stem cells were removed from the mutants, their lifespan did not increase. Further experiments analyzed the genes that are switched on by SKN-1, and identified many that are involved in fat metabolism, in degrading other proteins, and in detoxifying harmful molecules. The experiments also found that SKN-1 reduces the overall amount of fat stored in the body.

Next, Steinbaugh et al. investigated how SKN-1 stops fat from being stored. During reproduction, cells in the gut produce yolk—which is rich in fats—that will be provided to germ cells to nourish the developing embryo. Worms lacking germline stem cells are not able to reproduce, but they continue to make yolk. Steinbaugh et al. found that the build up of the yolk activates SKN-1, which in turn inhibits the further accumulation of fats.

Steinbaugh et al.'s findings show that SKN-1 can be activated by fat molecules and plays a direct role in controlling the amount of fat stored in the body of the worms. A future challenge will be to identify the specific fat molecules that activate SKN-1, which could provide a model for understanding how specific fats in human diets could have wide-ranging health benefits.

The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans has been invaluable for identifying mechanisms that slow aging and may prevent chronic disease (Kenyon, 2010). An intriguing finding that was first made in this organism is that when germline stem cells (GSCs) are ablated, mechanisms are activated in somatic tissues that protect against stress and increase lifespan (Hsin and Kenyon, 1999; Kenyon, 2010; Antebi, 2013; Hansen et al., 2013). GSC loss also increases lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster (Flatt et al., 2008), and castration has been associated with longevity in men (Min et al., 2012), suggesting that this relationship might be conserved. These beneficial effects of GSC removal may have evolved to maximize reproductive fitness under adversity (Partridge et al., 2005; Kenyon, 2010). This relationship provides paradigms for how tissue non-autonomous signals influence aging (Kenyon, 2010), and how a stem cell population communicates with the ‘niche’ that sustains it (Jones and Wagers, 2008).

In C. elegans, the effects of GSC absence have been studied by laser ablation of GSC precursors, which results in a complete loss of GSCs, or by analysis of genetic mutants in which GSC proliferation is inhibited so that the GSC number is very low, and mature germ cells are not formed (Hsin and Kenyon, 1999; Arantes-Oliveira et al., 2002; Kenyon, 2010). For simplicity, we will refer to each of these types of animals as GSC(−) animals. The lifespan extension seen in GSC(−) animals (GSC(−) longevity) requires the action of several conserved transcription factors in the intestine, the counterpart of the mammalian liver, digestive system, and adipose tissue (Kenyon, 2010; Antebi, 2013; Hansen et al., 2013). DAF-16/FOXO is needed for longevity from GSC ablation or reduced insulin/IGF-1 signaling (IIS) but is regulated differently by each pathway (Lin et al., 2001; Libina et al., 2003; Kenyon, 2010). GSC(−) longevity also requires HLH-30/TFEB, PHA-4/FOXA, and the nuclear receptors DAF-12/FXR, NHR-80/HNF4, and NHR-49/PPARα (Hsin and Kenyon, 1999; Goudeau et al., 2011; Lapierre et al., 2011; O'Rourke and Ruvkun, 2013; Ratnappan et al., 2014). Under most conditions, GSC(−) longevity also depends upon a hormonal signal from the somatic gonad that activates DAF-12 (Kenyon, 2010; Antebi, 2013). Aside from the identification of mechanisms required for DAF-16 function, we understand little about how GSCs influence these transcription factors (Kenyon, 2010; Antebi, 2013).

One hallmark of GSC(−) animals is enhancement of both proteostasis and stress resistance. During aging, GSC(−) animals maintain more robust responses to thermal and proteotoxic stress (Ben-Zvi et al., 2009). They also exhibit a striking daf-16-dependent increase in activity of the proteasome (Vilchez et al., 2012), a multisubunit complex which degrades proteins that the ubiquitylation system has tagged for decay (Glickman and Ciechanover, 2002; Goldberg, 2003). In addition, GSC removal enhances immunity (Alper et al., 2010) and boosts oxidative stress resistance through an undetermined DAF-16-independent mechanism (Libina et al., 2003).

Another notable characteristic of GSC(−) animals is that many aspects of lipid metabolism are altered. Expression of particular fatty acid (FA) oxidation, FA desaturation, and triglyceride lipase genes is increased, as is total lipase activity (Wang et al., 2008; Goudeau et al., 2011; Lapierre et al., 2011; McCormick et al., 2012; Ratnappan et al., 2014). Given that lipid catabolism is elevated, it seems paradoxical that GSC(−) animals also exhibit dramatically increased fat accumulation (O'Rourke et al., 2009). Interestingly, GSC(−) longevity seems to depend upon particular lipid metabolism processes. Production of the unsaturated free FA (FFA) oleic acid (OA) is required (Goudeau et al., 2011), as are the triglyceride lipases LIPL-4/LIPA and FARD-1/FAR2 (Wang et al., 2008; McCormick et al., 2012). It is of intense interest to determine whether the fat accumulation seen with GSC ablation might derive from production and storage of particular beneficial fats, or a salutary overall balance of lipid metabolism that is consistent with longevity (Ackerman and Gems, 2012; Hansen et al., 2013).

The C. elegans transcription factor SKN-1 controls a broad detoxification response to oxidative and xenobiotic stress and is orthologous to the mammalian Nrf1/2/3 (NF-E2-related factor) proteins (An and Blackwell, 2003; Oliveira et al., 2009; Park et al., 2009). SKN-1/Nrf proteins have been implicated in longevity from C. elegans to rodents (An and Blackwell, 2003; Bishop and Guarente, 2007; Leiser and Miller, 2010; Sykiotis and Bohmann, 2010; Steinbaugh et al., 2012; Ewald et al., 2015). Recent findings raise the question of whether these transcription regulators might also have important functions in lipid homeostasis. SKN-1/Nrf proteins influence expression of lipid metabolism genes (Oliveira et al., 2009; Paek et al., 2012; Hayes and Dinkova-Kostova, 2014; Tsujita et al., 2014), and SKN-1 has been linked to fat mobilization under particular starvation or dietary conditions (Paek et al., 2012; Pang et al., 2014). Mice that lack Nrf1 in the liver develop non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) that progresses to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and Nrf2^−/− mice develop NASH on a high-fat diet (Xu et al., 2005; Okada et al., 2013; Tsujita et al., 2014). However, reduced Nrf protein function is thought to predispose to NASH by impairing hepatic stress resistance (Xu et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2013). An understanding of NAFLD is a high priority, because its incidence is increasing as a sequella of metabolic syndrome (Cohen et al., 2011).

Here, we examined the role of SKN-1 in the effects of GSC absence on lifespan, stress resistance, and lipid metabolism. Genetic inhibition of GSCs activates SKN-1, thereby increasing lifespan and stress resistance. Expression profiling revealed that GSC(−) animals upregulate stress defense, extracellular matrix, and lipid metabolism genes, in many cases dependent upon skn-1. SKN-1 is also required for GSC inhibition to increase proteasome activity. SKN-1 is needed for GSC(−) longevity but reduces lipid storage, arguing against the idea that GSC(−) animals simply accumulate beneficial fat. Instead, these high-fat levels appear to derive from unconsumed yolk that was produced for reproduction. Unexpectedly, in GSC(−) animals, SKN-1 appears to be activated by specific FA signals, defining a new mechanism of SKN-1/Nrf protein regulation and GSC-to-soma communication. This homeostatic function of SKN-1 in lipid metabolism suggests that Nrf proteins have a similar role in preventing NASH.

The question of how events in one tissue can influence aging in others is of fundamental importance. The effects of GSC loss in C. elegans provide a paradigm for investigating this problem, as well as interactions between a stem cell population and its environment. Here, we determined that GSC inhibition leads to a broad transcriptional reprogramming in somatic tissues that involves activation of SKN-1, and that SKN-1 is required for many beneficial effects of GSC absence, including lifespan extension. Previous work showed that SKN-1 is required for lifespan to be extended by reduced insulin/IGF-1, mTORC1, or mTORC2 signaling, by dietary restriction and by low-level mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production (Bishop and Guarente, 2007; Tullet et al., 2008; Robida-Stubbs et al., 2012; Zarse et al., 2012; Schmeisser et al., 2013; Mizunuma et al., 2014; Moroz et al., 2014; Ewald et al., 2015). Our new data further support the idea that SKN-1/Nrf proteins are broadly important for longevity assurance.

One major role of SKN-1 in GSC(−) animals is to increase proteasome activity (Figure 4C,D, and Figure 4—figure supplement 1). In WT animals, SKN-1 activates most proteasome subunit genes when the proteasome is inhibited (Li et al., 2011). This compensatory function is conserved in its mammalian ortholog Nrf1, which is cleaved and activated when proteasome activity is low (Radhakrishnan et al., 2010; Steffen et al., 2010; Radhakrishnan et al., 2014; Sha and Goldberg, 2014). By contrast, in GSC(−) animals, proteasome activity is elevated (Figure 4C,D) (Vilchez et al., 2012), suggesting that additional mechanisms influence SKN-1/Nrf regulation of proteasome genes. In GSC(−) animals, most if not all proteasome subunit genes are dependent upon SKN-1 for their expression (Figure 4A), and SKN-1 and DAF-16 together activate the proteasome subunit gene rpn-6.1 (Figure 4E,F), the levels of which are rate limiting for proteasome activity (Vilchez et al., 2012). Overexpression of either rpn-6.1 or the 20S proteasome subunit pbs-5 increases C. elegans lifespan, and in the latter case, lifespan extension was shown to be skn-1-dependent (Vilchez et al., 2012; Chondrogianni et al., 2015), suggesting that enhancement of proteasome activity may be an important mechanism through which SKN-1/Nrf promotes longevity.

The evidence that GSC(−) longevity is associated with fat accumulation, and altered lipid metabolism has raised the intriguing possibility that GSC absence induces production of lipids that promote health and longevity (see ‘Introduction’). Our results are consistent with aspects of this model but suggest an important modification. GSC(−) animals accumulate dramatically high levels of yolk lipoproteins by the first day of adulthood (Figure 6A,B), providing a likely reason that they accumulate so much lipid. Moreover, SKN-1 acts to reduce fat accumulation but is critical for the benefits of GSC loss (Figure 5B,C, and Figure 5—figure supplement 1A,B), suggesting that GSC(−) animals do not simply overproduce healthful lipids. Finally, excess yolk accumulation induced by another method (rme-2 RNAi) leads to increased SKN-1 nuclear accumulation and target gene activation, and skn-1-dependent stress resistance (Figure 6D–G). Taken together, our data suggest that GSC(−) animals accumulate excess fat because they cannot stop production of fat that would otherwise support reproduction (Figure 7). Importantly, however, in responding to and metabolizing this fat they produce specific lipids that activate SKN-1 and other regulators, which in turn increase lifespan and may promote a more healthy balance of lipids (Figure 7).

Several lines of evidence support this model. GSC inhibition induces SKN-1 and NHR-49 to upregulate largely distinct sets of FA oxidation genes (Figure 5A) (Ratnappan et al., 2014). This effect of SKN-1 could account for its inhibitory role in fat accumulation (Figure 5B,C). A need to metabolize excess fat could also explain the importance of lipophagy in GSC(−) longevity (Lapierre et al., 2011; Hansen et al., 2013). With respect to signaling lipids, GSC(−) longevity requires the triglyceride lipase LIPL-4 (Wang et al., 2008), which generates unsaturated FFAs that promote longevity (O'Rourke et al., 2013; Folick et al., 2015). While LIPL-4-dependent FAs act through NHR-49 and NHR-80 (Lapierre et al., 2011; Folick et al., 2015), and possibly not SKN-1 (Figure 6J), in GSC(−) animals, SKN-1 activation involves the LIPL-1/3 lipases (Figure 6J), which also promote longevity (O'Rourke and Ruvkun, 2013). This elevated SKN-1 activity also depends upon lipid transfer proteins, as well as OA (Figure 6H–J and Figure 6—figure supplement 1C). OA is required for GSC(−) longevity (Goudeau et al., 2011) and is a precursor to unsaturated FAs that have signaling functions (O'Rourke et al., 2013; Folick et al., 2015). Finally, SKN-1 upregulates lipl-3 and lbp-8 in WT and GSC(−) animals (Figure 5A and Figure 5—figure supplement 3; Supplementary file 1a,c), suggesting that it may function both downstream and upstream of lipid signals. The idea that SKN-1 can be activated by lipids that arise from prevention of reproduction and yolk consumption should be considered in evaluation of genetic or pharmacological interventions that increase SKN-1 activity.

SKN-1 is activated by lipids and regulates lipid metabolism gene expression not only in the high-fat GSC(−) model but also in WT animals under normal feeding conditions (Figures 5, 6; Supplementary file 1b–d). Moreover, SKN-1 profoundly reduced fat storage by the beginning of adult life in healthy, reproductively active animals that have not begun to age. Taken together, our findings suggest that SKN-1 plays an integral and direct role in maintaining lipid homeostasis. Our results predict that insufficient mammalian Nrf function does not lead to NAFLD/NASH simply by increasing chronic hepatic stress (Xu et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2013), and that a protective function of Nrf proteins in fat metabolism is likely to be involved. Nrf proteins therefore may provide an important line of defense against metabolic disease. Development of NAFLD is a growing obesity-related public health issue (Cohen et al., 2011). Our data suggest that analysis of Nrf proteins could be a promising underexplored direction for investigating causes and prevention of NAFLD, and that SKN-1 and C. elegans provide a genetically tractable model that will be valuable in this effort.

Our evidence that GSCs activate SKN-1 through lipid-based signaling suggests a new mechanism through which GSCs influence the soma. The response to GSC loss therefore involves metabolic signals that reflect the altered nutritional balance within the organism. Similar interactions could be important in other stem cell contexts. For example, in the mammalian bone marrow microenvironment, adipose tissue profoundly influences the function of hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells (Adler et al., 2014; Muruganandan and Sinal, 2014). In addition to the mechanisms we have described here, GSC(−) longevity involves endocrine signals from the somatic gonad and depends upon absence of GSCs per se, not simply reproductive cessation (Kenyon, 2010; Antebi, 2013). It will now be of interest to determine how these mechanisms, as well as other transcription factors that are required for GSC(−) longevity (see ‘Introduction’), interface with SKN-1 and its regulation.

Signaling lipids from endogenous, dietary, or microbiota sources constitute an area of considerable excitement, because these signals can induce beneficial effects such as anti-inflammatory protection, enhanced insulin sensitivity, protection against metabolic disease, and increased lifespan in C. elegans (Wang et al., 2008; Kniazeva and Han, 2013; Lim et al., 2013; O'Rourke and Ruvkun, 2013; Folick et al., 2015; Han and Brunet, 2015). Signals derived from OA are of particular interest in this regard, because of its dietary availability in olive oil. Mechanisms through which lipid signals are known to act on transcription networks include binding to nuclear receptors, and OA-induced protein kinase A activation that ultimately leads to FA oxidation (Fu et al., 2003; Lim et al., 2013; Folick et al., 2015). By revealing SKN-1 as a new regulator of metabolism and stress defenses that is activated in response to lipids, our data suggest the exciting possibility that this might also be the case for mammalian Nrf proteins. They also suggest that a ‘lipohormesis’ pathway in which signaling lipids confer health benefits by activating SKN-1/Nrf may not only be a characteristic of GSC-ablated animals but also might be more broadly applicable for enhancing health- and possibly lifespan.

1. 1. Steinbaugh MJ
   2. Dreyfuss JM
   3. Blackwell TK

   (2015) RNA-seq analysis of germline stem cell removal and loss of SKN-1 in C. elegans

   Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (Accession no: GSE63075).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE63075

1. 1. Zhong M
   2. Snyder M
   3. Slightam C
   4. Kim S
   5. Murray J
   6. Waterston R
   7. Gerstein M
   8. Niu W
   9. Janette J
   10. Raha D
   11. Agarwal A
   12. Reinke V
   13. Sarov M
   14. Hyman A

   (2011) Identification of Transcription Factor SKN-1::GFP Binding Regions in L1

   Publicly available at modMine (Accession no: modENCODE_2622).

   http://intermine.modencode.org/release-33/report.do?id=77000137
2. 1. Zhong M
   2. Snyder M
   3. Slightam C
   4. Kim S
   5. Murray J
   6. Waterston R
   7. Gerstein M
   8. Niu W
   9. Janette J
   10. Raha D
   11. Agarwal A
   12. Reinke V
   13. Sarov M
   14. Hyman A

   (2013) Identification of Transcription Factor SKN-1::GFP Binding Regions in L2

   Publicly available at modMine (Accession no: modENCODE_3369).

   http://intermine.modencode.org/release-33/report.do?id=77000379
3. 1. Zhong M
   2. Snyder M
   3. Slightam C
   4. Kim S
   5. Murray J
   6. Waterston R
   7. Gerstein M
   8. Niu W
   9. Janette J
   10. Raha D
   11. Agarwal A
   12. Reinke V
   13. Sarov M
   14. Hyman A

   (2013) Identification of Transcription Factor SKN-1::GFP Binding Regions in L3

   Publicly available at modMine (Accession no: modENCODE_3838).

   http://intermine.modencode.org/release-33/report.do?id=77000500
4. 1. Zhong M
   2. Snyder M
   3. Slightam C
   4. Kim S
   5. Murray J
   6. Waterston R
   7. Gerstein M
   8. Niu W
   9. Janette J
   10. Raha D
   11. Agarwal A
   12. Reinke V
   13. Sarov M
   14. Hyman A

   (2013) Identification of Transcription Factor SKN-1::GFP Binding Regions in L4

   Publicly available at modMine (Accession no: modENCODE_4631).

   http://intermine.modencode.org/release-33/report.do?id=77000600
5. 1. Staab TA
   2. Griffen TC
   3. Corcoran C
   4. Evgrafov O
   5. Knowles JA
   6. Sieburth D

   (2013) SKN-1 from the JASPAR CORE database

   Publicly available at the JASPAR (Accession no: MA0547.1).

   http://jaspar.genereg.net/cgi-bin/jaspar_db.pl?rm=browse%26db=core%26tax_group=nematodes
6. 1. Zhong M
   2. Snyder M
   3. Slightam C
   4. Kim S
   5. Murray J
   6. Waterston R
   7. Gerstein M
   8. Niu W
   9. Janette J
   10. Raha D
   11. Agarwal A
   12. Reinke V
   13. Sarov M
   14. Hyman A

   (2011) Identification of Transcription Factor SKN-1::GFP Binding Regions in L1

   Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (Accession no: GSE25810).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE25810
7. 1. Zhong M
   2. Snyder M
   3. Slightam C
   4. Kim S
   5. Murray J
   6. Waterston R
   7. Gerstein M
   8. Niu W
   9. Janette J
   10. Raha D
   11. Agarwal A
   12. Reinke V
   13. Sarov M
   14. Hyman A

   (2013) Identification of Transcription Factor SKN-1::GFP Binding Regions in L3

   Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (Accession no: GSE48710).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE48710
8. 1. Zhong M
   2. Snyder M
   3. Slightam C
   4. Kim S
   5. Murray J
   6. Waterston R
   7. Gerstein M
   8. Niu W
   9. Janette J
   10. Raha D
   11. Agarwal A
   12. Reinke V
   13. Sarov M
   14. Hyman A

   (2013) Snyder_SKN-1_GFP_L4

   Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (Accession no: GSE46772).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE46772

1. 1. Ackerman D
   2. Gems D

   (2012) The mystery of C. elegans aging: an emerging role for fat. Distant parallels between C. elegans aging and metabolic syndrome?

   Bioessays 34:466–471.

   https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201100189

   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Adler BJ
   2. Kaushansky K
   3. Rubin CT

   (2014) Obesity-driven disruption of haematopoiesis and the bone marrow niche

   Nature Reviews. Endocrinology 10:737–748.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2014.169

   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Alper S
   2. McElwee MK
   3. Apfeld J
   4. Lackford B
   5. Freedman JH
   6. Schwartz DA

   (2010) The Caenorhabditis elegans germ line regulates distinct signaling pathways to control lifespan and innate immunity

   The Journal of Biological Chemistry 285:1822–1828.

   https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.057323

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. An JH
   2. Blackwell TK

   (2003) SKN-1 links C. elegans mesendodermal specification to a conserved oxidative stress response

   Genes & Development 17:1882–1893.

   https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1107803

   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Anders S
   2. McCarthy DJ
   3. Chen Y
   4. Okoniewski M
   5. Smyth GK
   6. Huber W
   7. Robinson MD

   (2013) Count-based differential expression analysis of RNA sequencing data using R and Bioconductor

   Nature Protocols 8:1765–1786.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.099

   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Antebi A

   (2013) Regulation of longevity by the reproductive system

   Experimental Gerontology 48:596–602.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2012.09.009

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Arantes-Oliveira N
   2. Apfeld J
   3. Dillin A
   4. Kenyon C

   (2002) Regulation of life-span by germ-line stem cells in Caenorhabditis elegans

   Science 295:502–505.

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1065768

   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Ben-Zvi A
   2. Miller EA
   3. Morimoto RI

   (2009) Collapse of proteostasis represents an early molecular event in Caenorhabditis elegans aging

   Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 106:14914–14919.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902882106

   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Benjamini Y
   2. Hochberg Y

   (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing

   Journal of the Royal statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 57:289–300.

   https://doi.org/10.2307/2346101

   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Berman JR
    2. Kenyon C

    (2006) Germ-cell loss extends C. elegans life span through regulation of DAF-16 by kri-1 and lipophilic-hormone signaling

    Cell 124:1055–1068.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.039

    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Bishop NA
    2. Guarente L

    (2007) Two neurons mediate diet-restriction-induced longevity in C. elegans

    Nature 447:545–549.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05904

    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Bowerman B
    2. Eaton BA
    3. Priess JR

    (1992) skn-1, a maternally expressed gene required to specify the fate of ventral blastomeres in the early C. elegans embryo

    Cell 68:1061–1075.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(92)90078-Q

    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Brenner S

    (1974)

    The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans

    Genetics 77:71–94.

    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Chikina MD
    2. Huttenhower C
    3. Murphy CT
    4. Troyanskaya OG

    (2009) Global prediction of tissue-specific gene expression and context-dependent gene networks in Caenorhabditis elegans

    PLOS Computational Biology 5:e1000417.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000417

    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Choe KP
    2. Przybysz AJ
    3. Strange K

    (2009) The WD40 repeat protein WDR-23 functions with the CUL4/DDB1 ubiquitin ligase to regulate nuclear abundance and activity of SKN-1 in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 29:2704–2715.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01811-08

    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Chondrogianni N
    2. Georgila K
    3. Kourtis N
    4. Tavernarakis N
    5. Gonos ES

    (2015) 20S proteasome activation promotes life span extension and resistance to proteotoxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans

    FASEB Journal: Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 29:611–622.

    https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.14-252189

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Cohen JC
    2. Horton JD
    3. Hobbs HH

    (2011) Human fatty liver disease: old questions and new insights

    Science 332:1519–1523.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204265

    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Curran SP
    2. Ruvkun G

    (2007) Lifespan regulation by evolutionarily conserved genes essential for viability

    PLOS Genetics 3:e56.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0030056

    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Dennis G Jr
    2. Sherman BT
    3. Hosack DA
    4. Yang J
    5. Gao W
    6. Lane HC
    7. Lempicki RA

    (2003) DAVID: database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery

    Genome Biology 4:P3.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2003-4-5-p3

    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Dobin A
    2. Davis CA
    3. Schlesinger F
    4. Drenkow J
    5. Zaleski C
    6. Jha S
    7. Batut P
    8. Chaisson M
    9. Gingeras TR

    (2013) STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner

    Bioinformatics 29:15–21.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635

    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Dorsett M
    2. Westlund B
    3. Schedl T

    (2009) METT-10, a putative methyltransferase, inhibits germ cell proliferative fate in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Genetics 183:233–247.

    https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.109.105270

    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Durinck S
    2. Moreau Y
    3. Kasprzyk A
    4. Davis S
    5. De Moor B
    6. Brazma A
    7. Huber W

    (2005) BioMart and Bioconductor: a powerful link between biological databases and microarray data analysis

    Bioinformatics 21:3439–3440.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti525

    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Durinck S
    2. Spellman PT
    3. Birney E
    4. Huber W

    (2009) Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/Bioconductor package biomaRt

    Nature Protocols 4:1184–1191.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.97

    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Ewald CY
    2. Landis JN
    3. Abate JP
    4. Murphy CT
    5. Blackwell TK

    (2015) Dauer-independent insulin/IGF-1-signalling implicates collagen remodelling in longevity

    Nature 519:97–101.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14021

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Flatt T
    2. Min KJ
    3. D'Alterio C
    4. Villa-Cuesta E
    5. Cumbers J
    6. Lehmann R
    7. Jones DL
    8. Tatar M

    (2008) Drosophila germ-line modulation of insulin signaling and lifespan

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 105:6368–6373.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709128105

    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Folick A
    2. Oakley HD
    3. Yu Y
    4. Armstrong EH
    5. Kumari M
    6. Sanor L
    7. Moore DD
    8. Ortlund EA
    9. Zechner R
    10. Wang MC

    (2015) Aging. Lysosomal signaling molecules regulate longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Science 347:83–86.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857

    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Fu J
    2. Gaetani S
    3. Oveisi F
    4. Lo Verme J
    5. Serrano A
    6. Rodriguez De Fonseca F
    7. Rosengarth A
    8. Luecke H
    9. Di Giacomo B
    10. Tarzia G
    11. Piomelli D

    (2003) Oleylethanolamide regulates feeding and body weight through activation of the nuclear receptor PPAR-alpha

    Nature 425:90–93.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01921

    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Furuyama T
    2. Nakazawa T
    3. Nakano I
    4. Mori N

    (2000) Identification of the differential distribution patterns of mRNAs and consensus binding sequences for mouse DAF-16 homologues

    The Biochemical Journal 349:629–634.

    https://doi.org/10.1042/0264-6021:3490629

    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Gentleman RC
    2. Carey VJ
    3. Bates DM
    4. Bolstad B
    5. Dettling M
    6. Dudoit S
    7. Ellis B
    8. Gautier L
    9. Ge Y
    10. Gentry J
    11. Hornik K
    12. Hothorn T
    13. Huber W
    14. Iacus S
    15. Irizarry R
    16. Leisch F
    17. Li C
    18. Maechler M
    19. Rossini AJ
    20. Sawitzki G
    21. Smith C
    22. Smyth G
    23. Tierney L
    24. Yang JY
    25. Zhang J

    (2004) Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics

    Genome Biology 5:R80.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80

    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Gerstein MB
    2. Lu ZJ
    3. Van Nostrand EL
    4. Cheng C
    5. Arshinoff BI
    6. Liu T
    7. Yip KY
    8. Robilotto R
    9. Rechtsteiner A
    10. Ikegami K
    11. Alves P
    12. Chateigner A
    13. Perry M
    14. Morris M
    15. Auerbach RK
    16. Feng X
    17. Leng J
    18. Vielle A
    19. Niu W
    20. Rhrissorrakrai K
    21. Agarwal A
    22. Alexander RP
    23. Barber G
    24. Brdlik CM
    25. Brennan J
    26. Brouillet JJ
    27. Carr A
    28. Cheung MS
    29. Clawson H
    30. Contrino S
    31. Dannenberg LO
    32. Dernburg AF
    33. Desai A
    34. Dick L
    35. Dosé AC
    36. Du J
    37. Egelhofer T
    38. Ercan S
    39. Euskirchen G
    40. Ewing B
    41. Feingold EA
    42. Gassmann R
    43. Good PJ
    44. Green P
    45. Gullier F
    46. Gutwein M
    47. Guyer MS
    48. Habegger L
    49. Han T
    50. Henikoff JG
    51. Henz SR
    52. Hinrichs A
    53. Holster H
    54. Hyman T
    55. Iniguez AL
    56. Janette J
    57. Jensen M
    58. Kato M
    59. Kent WJ
    60. Kephart E
    61. Khivansara V
    62. Khurana E
    63. Kim JK
    64. Kolasinska-Zwierz P
    65. Lai EC
    66. Latorre I
    67. Leahey A
    68. Lewis S
    69. Lloyd P
    70. Lochovsky L
    71. Lowdon RF
    72. Lubling Y
    73. Lyne R
    74. MacCoss M
    75. Mackowiak SD
    76. Mangone M
    77. McKay S
    78. Mecenas D
    79. Merrihew G
    80. Miller DM III
    81. Muroyama A
    82. Murray JI
    83. Ooi SL
    84. Pham H
    85. Phippen T
    86. Preston EA
    87. Rajewsky N
    88. Rätsch G
    89. Rosenbaum H
    90. Rozowsky J
    91. Rutherford K
    92. Ruzanov P
    93. Sarov M
    94. Sasidharan R
    95. Sboner A
    96. Scheid P
    97. Segal E
    98. Shin H
    99. Shou C
    100. Slack FJ
    101. Slightam C
    102. Smith R
    103. Spencer WC
    104. Stinson EO
    105. Taing S
    106. Takasaki T
    107. Vafeados D
    108. Voronina K
    109. Wang G
    110. Washington NL
    111. Whittle CM
    112. Wu B
    113. Yan KK
    114. Zeller G
    115. Zha Z
    116. Zhong M
    117. Zhou X
    118. modENCODE Consortium
    119. Ahringer J
    120. Strome S
    121. Gunsalus KC
    122. Micklem G
    123. Liu XS
    124. Reinke AV
    125. Kim SK
    126. Hillier LW
    127. Henikoff S
    128. Piano F
    129. Snyder M
    130. Stein L
    131. Lieb JD
    132. Waterston RH

    (2010) Integrative analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome by the modENCODE project

    Science 330:1775–1787.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196914

    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Ghazi A
    2. Henis-Korenblit S
    3. Kenyon C

    (2009) A transcription elongation factor that links signals from the reproductive system to lifespan extension in Caenorhabditis elegans

    PLOS Genetics 5:e1000639.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000639

    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Glickman MH
    2. Ciechanover A

    (2002) The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction

    Physiological Reviews 82:373–428.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00027.2001

    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Goldberg AL

    (2003) Protein degradation and protection against misfolded or damaged proteins

    Nature 426:895–899.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02263

    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Goudeau J
    2. Bellemin S
    3. Toselli-Mollereau E
    4. Shamalnasab M
    5. Chen Y
    6. Aguilaniu H

    (2011) Fatty acid desaturation links germ cell loss to longevity through NHR-80/HNF4 in C. elegans

    PLOS Biology 9:e1000599.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000599

    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Grant B
    2. Hirsh D

    (1999) Receptor-mediated endocytosis in the Caenorhabditis elegans oocyte

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 10:4311–4326.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.10.12.4311

    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Han S
    2. Brunet A

    (2015) Cell biology. Lysosomal lipid lengthens life span

    Science 347:32–33.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa4565

    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Hansen M
    2. Flatt T
    3. Aguilaniu H

    (2013) Reproduction, fat metabolism, and life span: what is the connection?

    Cell Metabolism 17:10–19.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.12.003

    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Hayes JD
    2. Dinkova-Kostova AT

    (2014) The Nrf2 regulatory network provides an interface between redox and intermediary metabolism

    Trends in Biochemical Sciences 39:199–218.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2014.02.002

    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Henderson ST
    2. Johnson TE

    (2001) daf-16 integrates developmental and environmental inputs to mediate aging in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

    Current Biology 11:1975–1980.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00594-2

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Hoogewijs D
    2. Houthoofd K
    3. Matthijssens F
    4. Vandesompele J
    5. Vanfleteren JR

    (2008) Selection and validation of a set of reliable reference genes for quantitative sod gene expression analysis in C. elegans

    BMC Molecular Biology 9:9.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-9-9

    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Hsin H
    2. Kenyon C

    (1999) Signals from the reproductive system regulate the lifespan of C. elegans

    Nature 399:362–366.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/20694

    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Inoue H
    2. Hisamoto N
    3. An JH
    4. Oliveira RP
    5. Nishida E
    6. Blackwell TK
    7. Matsumoto K

    (2005) The C. elegans p38 MAPK pathway regulates nuclear localization of the transcription factor SKN-1 in oxidative stress response

    Genes & Development 19:2278–2283.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1324805

    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Jones DL
    2. Wagers AJ

    (2008) No place like home: anatomy and function of the stem cell niche

    Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 9:11–21.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2319

    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Kamath RS
    2. Martinez-Campos M
    3. Zipperlen P
    4. Fraser AG
    5. Ahringer J

    (2001) Effectiveness of specific RNA-mediated interference through ingested double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Genome Biology 2:RESEARCH0002.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2000-2-1-research0002

    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Kel AE
    2. Gossling E
    3. Reuter I
    4. Cheremushkin E
    5. Kel-Margoulis OV
    6. Wingender E

    (2003) MATCH: a tool for searching transcription factor binding sites in DNA sequences

    Nucleic Acids Research 31:3576–3579.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg585

    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Kenyon CJ

    (2010) The genetics of ageing

    Nature 464:504–512.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08980

    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Kimble J
    2. Crittenden SL

    (2005) Germline proliferation and its control

    Wormbook pp. 1–14.

    https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.13.1

    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Kisselev AF
    2. Goldberg AL

    (2005) Monitoring activity and inhibition of 26S proteasomes with fluorogenic peptide substrates

    Methods Enzymol 398:364–378.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(05)98030-0

    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Kniazeva M
    2. Han M

    (2013) Fat chance for longevity

    Genes & Development 27:351–354.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.214189.113

    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Kokatnur MG
    2. Oalmann MC
    3. Johnson WD
    4. Malcom GT
    5. Strong JP

    (1979)

    Fatty acid composition of human adipose tissue from two anatomical sites in a biracial community

    The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 32:2198–2205.

    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Lapierre LR
    2. Gelino S
    3. Melendez A
    4. Hansen M

    (2011) Autophagy and lipid metabolism coordinately modulate life span in germline-less C. elegans

    Current Biology 21:1507–1514.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.07.042

    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Law CW
    2. Chen Y
    3. Shi W
    4. Smyth GK

    (2014) voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts

    Genome Biology 15:R29.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r29

    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Lawrence M
    2. Huber W
    3. Pages H
    4. Aboyoun P
    5. Carlson M
    6. Gentleman R
    7. Morgan MT
    8. Carey VJ

    (2013) Software for computing and annotating genomic ranges

    PLOS Computational Biology 9:e1003118.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003118

    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Lee CS
    2. Ho DV
    3. Chan JY

    (2013) Nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 1 regulates expression of proteasome genes in hepatocytes and protects against endoplasmic reticulum stress and steatosis in mice

    The FEBS Journal 280:3609–3620.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.12350

    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Leiser SF
    2. Miller RA

    (2010) Nrf2 signaling, a mechanism for cellular stress resistance in long-lived mice

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 30:871–884.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01145-09

    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Li X
    2. Matilainen O
    3. Jin C
    4. Glover-Cutter KM
    5. Holmberg CI
    6. Blackwell TK

    (2011) Specific SKN-1/Nrf stress responses to perturbations in translation elongation and proteasome activity

    PLOS Genetics 7:e1002119.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002119

    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Liao Y
    2. Smyth GK
    3. Shi W

    (2013) The Subread aligner: fast, accurate and scalable read mapping by seed-and-vote

    Nucleic Acids Research 41:e108.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt214

    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Liao Y
    2. Smyth GK
    3. Shi W

    (2014) featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features

    Bioinformatics 30:923–930.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656

    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Libina N
    2. Berman JR
    3. Kenyon C

    (2003) Tissue-specific activities of C. elegans DAF-16 in the regulation of lifespan

    Cell 115:489–502.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00889-4

    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Lim JH
    2. Gerhart-Hines Z
    3. Dominy JE
    4. Lee Y
    5. Kim S
    6. Tabata M
    7. Xiang YK
    8. Puigserver P

    (2013) Oleic acid stimulates complete oxidation of fatty acids through protein kinase A-dependent activation of SIRT1-PGC1alpha complex

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 288:7117–7126.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.415729

    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Lin K
    2. Hsin H
    3. Libina N
    4. Kenyon C

    (2001) Regulation of the Caenorhabditis elegans longevity protein DAF-16 by insulin/IGF-1 and germline signaling

    Nature Genetics 28:139–145.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/88850

    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Link CD
    2. Johnson CJ

    (2002) Reporter transgenes for study of oxidant stress in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Methods Enzymol 353:497–505.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(02)53072-X

    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Matys V
    2. Kel-Margoulis OV
    3. Fricke E
    4. Liebich I
    5. Land S
    6. Barre-Dirrie A
    7. Reuter I
    8. Chekmenev D
    9. Krull M
    10. Hornischer K
    11. Voss N
    12. Stegmaier P
    13. Lewicki-Potapov B
    14. Saxel H
    15. Kel AE
    16. Wingender E

    (2006) TRANSFAC and its module TRANSCompel: transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes

    Nucleic Acids Research 34:D108–D110.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkj143

    • Google Scholar
64. 1. McCormick M
    2. Chen K
    3. Ramaswamy P
    4. Kenyon C

    (2012) New genes that extend Caenorhabditis elegans' lifespan in response to reproductive signals

    Aging Cell 11:192–202.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2011.00768.x

    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Mercier E
    2. Gottardo R

    (2014) MotIV: Motif Identification and Validation

    MotIV: Motif Identification and Validation, http://bioconductor.org/packages/MotIV/.

    http://bioconductor.org/packages/MotIV/

    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Min KJ
    2. Lee CK
    3. Park HN

    (2012) The lifespan of Korean eunuchs

    Current Biology 22:R792–R793.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.036

    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Mitchell DH
    2. Stiles JW
    3. Santelli J
    4. Sanadi DR

    (1979) Synchronous growth and aging of Caenorhabditis elegans in the presence of fluorodeoxyuridine

    Journal of Gerontology 34:28–36.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/34.1.28

    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Mizunuma M
    2. Neumann-Haefelin E
    3. Moroz N
    4. Li Y
    5. Blackwell TK

    (2014) mTORC2-SGK-1 acts in two environmentally responsive pathways with opposing effects on longevity

    Aging Cell 13:869–878.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12248

    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Moerman DG
    2. Williams BD

    (2006) Sarcomere assembly in C. elegans muscle

    Wormbook pp. 1–16.

    https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.81.1

    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Moroz N
    2. Carmona JJ
    3. Anderson E
    4. Hart AC
    5. Sinclair DA
    6. Blackwell TK

    (2014) Dietary restriction involves NAD(+) -dependent mechanisms and a shift toward oxidative metabolism

    Aging Cell 13:1075–1085.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12273

    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Murphy CT
    2. McCarroll SA
    3. Bargmann CI
    4. Fraser A
    5. Kamath RS
    6. Ahringer J
    7. Li H
    8. Kenyon C

    (2003) Genes that act downstream of DAF-16 to influence the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans

    Nature 424:277–283.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01789

    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Muruganandan S
    2. Sinal CJ

    (2014) The impact of bone marrow adipocytes on osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation

    IUBMB Life 66:147–155.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.1254

    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Na H
    2. Zhang P
    3. Chen Y
    4. Zhu X
    5. Liu Y
    6. Author
    7. Xie K
    8. Xu N
    9. Yang F
    10. Yu Y

    et al. (2015) Identification of lipid droplet structure-like/Resident proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta pp. S0167–S4889.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.05.020

    • Google Scholar
74. Book

    1. National Research Council

    (1976)

    Fat content and composition of animal products

    Washington, DC: Printing and Publishing Office, National Academy of Sciences.

    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Na H
    2. Zhang P
    3. Chen Y
    4. Zhu X
    5. Liu Y
    6. Liu Y
    7. Xie K
    8. Xu N
    9. Yang F
    10. Yu Y
    11. Cichello S
    12. Mak HY
    13. Wang MC
    14. Zhang H
    15. Liu P

    (2011) Diverse transcription factor binding features revealed by genome-wide ChIP-seq in C. elegans

    Genome Research 21:245–254.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.114587.110

    • Google Scholar
76. 1. O'Rourke EJ
    2. Kuballa P
    3. Xavier R
    4. Ruvkun G

    (2013) omega-6 Polyunsaturated fatty acids extend life span through the activation of autophagy

    Genes & Development 27:429–440.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.205294.112

    • Google Scholar
77. 1. O'Rourke EJ
    2. Ruvkun G

    (2013) MXL-3 and HLH-30 transcriptionally link lipolysis and autophagy to nutrient availability

    Nature Cell Biology 15:668–676.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2741

    • Google Scholar
78. 1. O'Rourke EJ
    2. Soukas AA
    3. Carr CE
    4. Ruvkun G

    (2009) C. elegans major fats are stored in vesicles distinct from lysosome-related organelles

    Cell Metabolism 10:430–435.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2009.10.002

    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Okada K
    2. Warabi E
    3. Sugimoto H
    4. Horie M
    5. Gotoh N
    6. Tokushige K
    7. Hashimoto E
    8. Utsunomiya H
    9. Takahashi H
    10. Ishii T
    11. Yamamoto M
    12. Shoda J

    (2013) Deletion of Nrf2 leads to rapid progression of steatohepatitis in mice fed atherogenic plus high-fat diet

    Journal of Gastroenterology 48:620–632.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-012-0659-z

    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Oliveira RP
    2. Porter Abate J
    3. Dilks K
    4. Landis J
    5. Ashraf J
    6. Murphy CT
    7. Blackwell TK

    (2009) Condition-adapted stress and longevity gene regulation by Caenorhabditis elegans SKN-1/Nrf

    Aging Cell 8:524–541.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00501.x

    • Google Scholar
81. 1. Ou J
    2. Brodsky M
    3. Wolfe S
    4. Zhu LJ

    (2013) motifStack: Plot stacked logos for single or multiple DNA, RNA and amino acid sequence

    motifStack: Plot stacked logos for single or multiple DNA, RNA and amino acid sequence, http://bioconductor.org/packages/motifStack/.

    http://bioconductor.org/packages/motifStack/

    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Paek J
    2. Lo JY
    3. Narasimhan SD
    4. Nguyen TN
    5. Glover-Cutter K
    6. Robida-Stubbs S
    7. Suzuki T
    8. Yamamoto M
    9. Blackwell TK
    10. Curran SP

    (2012) Mitochondrial SKN-1/Nrf mediates a conserved starvation response

    Cell Metabolism 16:526–537.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.09.007

    • Google Scholar
83. 1. Pang S
    2. Lynn DA
    3. Lo JY
    4. Paek J
    5. Curran SP

    (2014) SKN-1 and Nrf2 couples proline catabolism with lipid metabolism during nutrient deprivation

    Nature Communications 5:5048.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6048

    • Google Scholar
84. 1. Park SK
    2. Tedesco PM
    3. Johnson TE

    (2009) Oxidative stress and longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans as mediated by SKN-1

    Aging Cell 8:258–269.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00473.x

    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Partridge L
    2. Gems D
    3. Withers DJ

    (2005) Sex and death: what is the connection?

    Cell 120:461–472.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.026

    • Google Scholar
86. 1. Porta-de-la-Riva M
    2. Fontrodona L
    3. Villanueva A
    4. Ceron J

    (2012) Basic Caenorhabditis elegans methods: synchronization and observation

    Journal of Visualized Experiments e4019.

    https://doi.org/10.3791/4019

    • Google Scholar
87. 1. Pulak R

    (2006) Techniques for analysis, sorting, and dispensing of C. elegans on the COPAS flow-sorting system

    Methods in Molecular Biology 351:275–286.

    https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59745-151-7:275

    • Google Scholar
88. 1. R Core Team

    (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing

    R: a language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org/.

    http://www.R-project.org/

    • Google Scholar
89. 1. Radhakrishnan SK
    2. den Besten W
    3. Deshaies RJ

    (2014) p97-dependent retrotranslocation and proteolytic processing govern formation of active Nrf1 upon proteasome inhibition

    eLife 3:e01856.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01856

    • Google Scholar
90. 1. Radhakrishnan SK
    2. Lee CS
    3. Young P
    4. Beskow A
    5. Chan JY
    6. Deshaies RJ

    (2010) Transcription factor Nrf1 mediates the proteasome recovery pathway after proteasome inhibition in mammalian cells

    Molecular Cell 38:17–28.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.029

    • Google Scholar
91. 1. Ratnappan R
    2. Amrit FR
    3. Chen SW
    4. Gill H
    5. Holden K
    6. Ward J
    7. Yamamoto KR
    8. Olsen CP
    9. Ghazi A

    (2014) Germline signals deploy NHR-49 to modulate fatty-acid beta-oxidation and desaturation in somatic tissues of C. elegans

    PLOS Genetics 10:e1004829.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004829

    • Google Scholar
92. 1. Richmond J

    (2005) Synaptic function

    Wormbook pp. 1–14.

    https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.69.1

    • Google Scholar
93. 1. Robida-Stubbs S
    2. Glover-Cutter K
    3. Lamming DW
    4. Mizunuma M
    5. Narasimhan SD
    6. Neumann-Haefelin E
    7. Sabatini DM
    8. Blackwell TK

    (2012) TOR signaling and rapamycin influence longevity by regulating SKN-1/Nrf and DAF-16/FoxO

    Cell Metabolism 15:713–724.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.04.007

    • Google Scholar
94. 1. Sandelin A
    2. Alkema W
    3. Engstrom P
    4. Wasserman WW
    5. Lenhard B

    (2004) JASPAR: an open-access database for eukaryotic transcription factor binding profiles

    Nucleic Acids Research 32:D91–D94.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh012

    • Google Scholar
95. 1. Schmeisser S
    2. Schmeisser K
    3. Weimer S
    4. Groth M
    5. Priebe S
    6. Fazius E
    7. Kuhlow D
    8. Pick D
    9. Einax JW
    10. Guthke R
    11. Platzer M
    12. Zarse K
    13. Ristow M

    (2013) Mitochondrial hormesis links low-dose arsenite exposure to lifespan extension

    Aging Cell 12:508–517.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12076

    • Google Scholar
96. 1. Sha Z
    2. Goldberg AL

    (2014) Proteasome-mediated processing of Nrf1 is essential for coordinate induction of all proteasome subunits and p97

    Current Biology 24:1573–1583.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.004

    • Google Scholar
97. 1. Shannon P

    (2014) MotifDb: An annotated collection of protein-DNA binding sequence motifs

    MotifDb: An annotated collection of protein-DNA binding sequence motifs, http://bioconductor.org/packages/MotifDb/.

    http://bioconductor.org/packages/MotifDb/

    • Google Scholar
98. 1. Shaye DD
    2. Greenwald I

    (2011) OrthoList: a compendium of C. elegans genes with human orthologs

    PLOS ONE 6:e20085.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020085

    • Google Scholar
99. 1. Shen Y
    2. Wollam J
    3. Magner D
    4. Karalay O
    5. Antebi A

    (2012) A steroid receptor-microRNA switch regulates life span in response to signals from the gonad

    Science 338:1472–1476.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1228967

    • Google Scholar
100. 1. Smyth GK

     (2005)

     limma: linear models for microarray data. Computational Biology Solutions Using R and Bioconductor, Statistics for Biology and Health

     397–420, limma: linear models for microarray data. Computational Biology Solutions Using R and Bioconductor, Statistics for Biology and Health, 10.1007/0-387-29362-0_23.

     • Google Scholar
101. 1. Staab TA
     2. Griffen TC
     3. Corcoran C
     4. Evgrafov O
     5. Knowles JA
     6. Sieburth D

     (2013a) The conserved SKN-1/Nrf2 stress response pathway regulates synaptic function in Caenorhabditis elegans

     PLOS Genetics 9:e1003354.

     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003354

     • Google Scholar
102. 1. Staab TA
     2. Griffen TC
     3. Corcoran C
     4. Evgrafov O
     5. Knowles JA
     6. Sieburth D

     (2013) SKN-1 from the JASPAR CORE database

     SKN-1 from the JASPAR CORE database, JASPAR, MA0547.1, http://jaspar.genereg.net/cgi-bin/jaspar_db.pl?rm=browse&db=core&tax_group=nematodes.

     http://jaspar.genereg.net/cgi-bin/jaspar_db.pl?rm=browse%26db=core%26tax_group=nematodes

     • Google Scholar
103. 1. Steffen J
     2. Seeger M
     3. Koch A
     4. Kruger E

     (2010) Proteasomal degradation is transcriptionally controlled by TCF11 via an ERAD-dependent feedback loop

     Molecular Cell 40:147–158.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.012

     • Google Scholar
104. 1. Steinbaugh MJ
     2. Sun LY
     3. Bartke A
     4. Miller RA

     (2012) Activation of genes involved in xenobiotic metabolism is a shared signature of mouse models with extended lifespan

     American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism 303:E488–E495.

     https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00110.2012

     • Google Scholar
105. 1. Steinbaugh MJ
     2. Dreyfuss JM
     3. Blackwell TK

     (2015) RNA-seq analysis of germline stem cell removal and loss of SKN-1 in C. elegans

     RNA-seq analysis of germline stem cell removal and loss of SKN-1 in C. elegans, NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE63075, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE63075.

     http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE63075

     • Google Scholar
106. 1. Sykiotis GP
     2. Bohmann D

     (2010) Stress-activated cap'n'collar transcription factors in aging and human disease

     Science Signaling 3:re3.

     https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.3112re3

     • Google Scholar
107. 1. Tsujita T
     2. Peirce V
     3. Baird L
     4. Matsuyama Y
     5. Takaku M
     6. Walsh SV
     7. Griffin JL
     8. Uruno A
     9. Yamamoto M
     10. Hayes JD

     (2014) Transcription factor Nrf1 negatively regulates the cystine/glutamate transporter and lipid-metabolizing enzymes

     Molecular and Cellular Biology 34:3800–3816.

     https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00110-14

     • Google Scholar
108. 1. Tullet JM
     2. Hertweck M
     3. An JH
     4. Baker J
     5. Hwang JY
     6. Liu S
     7. Oliveira RP
     8. Baumeister R
     9. Blackwell TK

     (2008) Direct inhibition of the longevity-promoting factor SKN-1 by insulin-like signaling in C. elegans

     Cell 132:1025–1038.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.030

     • Google Scholar
109. 1. Vilchez D
     2. Morantte I
     3. Liu Z
     4. Douglas PM
     5. Merkwirth C
     6. Rodrigues AP
     7. Manning G
     8. Dillin A

     (2012) RPN-6 determines C. elegans longevity under proteotoxic stress conditions

     Nature 489:263–268.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11315

     • Google Scholar
110. 1. Wang MC
     2. O'Rourke EJ
     3. Ruvkun G

     (2008) Fat metabolism links germline stem cells and longevity in C. elegans

     Science 322:957–960.

     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162011

     • Google Scholar
111. 1. Warnes GR
     2. Bolker B
     3. Bonebakker L
     4. Gentleman R
     5. Liaw WHA
     6. Lumley T
     7. Maechler M
     8. Magnusson A
     9. Moeller S
     10. Schwartz M
     11. Venables B

     (2014) gplots: various R programming tools for plotting data

     gplots: various R programming tools for plotting data, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gplots.

     http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gplots

     • Google Scholar
112. 1. Xu Z
     2. Chen L
     3. Leung L
     4. Yen TS
     5. Lee C
     6. Chan JY

     (2005) Liver-specific inactivation of the Nrf1 gene in adult mouse leads to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatic neoplasia

     Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 102:4120–4125.

     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500660102

     • Google Scholar
113. 1. Yang F
     2. Vought BW
     3. Satterlee JS
     4. Walker AK
     5. Jim Sun ZY
     6. Watts JL
     7. DeBeaumont R
     8. Saito RM
     9. Hyberts SG
     10. Yang S
     11. Macol C
     12. Iyer L
     13. Tjian R
     14. van den Heuvel S
     15. Hart AC
     16. Wagner G
     17. Näär AM

     (2006) An ARC/Mediator subunit required for SREBP control of cholesterol and lipid homeostasis

     Nature 442:700–704.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04942

     • Google Scholar
114. 1. Yen K
     2. Le TT
     3. Bansal A
     4. Narasimhan SD
     5. Cheng JX
     6. Tissenbaum HA

     (2010) A comparative study of fat storage quantitation in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans using label and label-free methods

     PLOS ONE 5:e12810.

     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012810

     • Google Scholar
115. 1. Zarse K
     2. Schmeisser S
     3. Groth M
     4. Priebe S
     5. Beuster G
     6. Kuhlow D
     7. Guthke R
     8. Platzer M
     9. Kahn CR
     10. Ristow M

     (2012) Impaired insulin/IGF1 signaling extends life span by promoting mitochondrial L-proline catabolism to induce a transient ROS signal

     Cell Metabolism 15:451–465.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.02.013

     • Google Scholar
116. 1. Zhang P
     2. Na H
     3. Liu Z
     4. Zhang S
     5. Xue P
     6. Chen Y
     7. Pu J
     8. Peng G
     9. Huang X
     10. Yang F
     11. Xie Z
     12. Xu T
     13. Xu P
     14. Ou G
     15. Zhang SO
     16. Liu P

     (2012) Proteomic study and marker protein identification of Caenorhabditis elegans lipid droplets

     Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 11:317–328.

     https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M111.016345

     • Google Scholar
117. 1. Zhong M
     2. Snyder M
     3. Slightam C
     4. Kim S
     5. Murray J
     6. Waterston R
     7. Gerstein M
     8. Niu W
     9. Janette J
     10. Raha D
     11. Agarwal A
     12. Reinke V
     13. Sarov M
     14. Hyman A

     (2011) Identification of Transcription Factor SKN-1::GFP Binding Regions in L1

     Identification of Transcription Factor SKN-1::GFP Binding Regions in L1, modMine, modENCODE_2622, http://intermine.modencode.org/release-33/report.do?id=77000137.

     http://intermine.modencode.org/release-33/report.do?id=77000137

     • Google Scholar
118. 1. Zhong M
     2. Snyder M
     3. Slightam C
     4. Kim S
     5. Murray J
     6. Waterston R
     7. Gerstein M
     8. Niu W
     9. Janette J
     10. Raha D
     11. Agarwal A
     12. Reinke V
     13. Sarov M
     14. Hyman A

     (2011) Identification of Transcription Factor SKN-1::GFP Binding Regions in L1

     Identification of Transcription Factor SKN-1::GFP Binding Regions in L1, NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE25810, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE25810.

     http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE25810

     • Google Scholar
119. 1. Zhong M
     2. Snyder M
     3. Slightam C
     4. Kim S
     5. Murray J
     6. Waterston R
     7. Gerstein M
     8. Niu W
     9. Janette J
     10. Raha D
     11. Agarwal A
     12. Reinke V
     13. Sarov M
     14. Hyman A

     (2013) Identification of Transcription Factor SKN-1::GFP Binding Regions in L2

     Identification of Transcription Factor SKN-1::GFP Binding Regions in L2, modMine, mod ENCODE_3369, http://intermine.modencode.org/release-33/report.do?id=77000379.

     http://intermine.modencode.org/release-33/report.do?id=77000379

     • Google Scholar
120. 1. Zhong M
     2. Snyder M
     3. Slightam C
     4. Kim S
     5. Murray J
     6. Waterston R
     7. Gerstein M
     8. Niu W
     9. Janette J
     10. Raha D
     11. Agarwal A
     12. Reinke V
     13. Sarov M
     14. Hyman A

     (2013) Identification of Transcription Factor SKN-1::GFP Binding Regions in L3

     Identification of Transcription Factor SKN-1::GFP Binding Regions in L3, modMine, modENCODE_3838, http://intermine.modencode.org/release-33/report.do?id=77000500.

     http://intermine.modencode.org/release-33/report.do?id=77000500

     • Google Scholar
121. 1. Zhong M
     2. Snyder M
     3. Slightam C
     4. Kim S
     5. Murray J
     6. Waterston R
     7. Gerstein M
     8. Niu W
     9. Janette J
     10. Raha D
     11. Agarwal A
     12. Reinke V
     13. Sarov M
     14. Hyman A

     (2013) Identification of Transcription Factor SKN-1::GFP Binding Regions in L4

     Identification of Transcription Factor SKN-1::GFP Binding Regions in L4, modMine, modENCODE_4631, http://intermine.modencode.org/release-33/report.do?id=77000600.

     http://intermine.modencode.org/release-33/report.do?id=77000600

     • Google Scholar
122. 1. Zhong M
     2. Snyder M
     3. Slightam C
     4. Kim S
     5. Murray J
     6. Waterston R
     7. Gerstein M
     8. Niu W
     9. Janette J
     10. Raha D
     11. Agarwal A
     12. Reinke V
     13. Sarov M
     14. Hyman A

     (2013) Identification of Transcription Factor SKN-1::GFP Binding Regions in L3

     Identification of Transcription Factor SKN-1::GFP Binding Regions in L3, NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE48710, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE48710.

     http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE48710

     • Google Scholar
123. 1. Zhong M
     2. Snyder M
     3. Slightam C
     4. Kim S
     5. Murray J
     6. Waterston R
     7. Gerstein M
     8. Niu W
     9. Janette J
     10. Raha D
     11. Agarwal A
     12. Reinke V
     13. Sarov M
     14. Hyman A

     (2013) Snyder_SKN-1_GFP_L4

     Snyder_SKN-1_GFP_L4, NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE46772, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE46772.

     http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE46772

     • Google Scholar
124. 1. Zhu LJ
     2. Gazin C
     3. Lawson ND
     4. Pages H
     5. Lin SM
     6. Lapointe DS
     7. Green MR

     (2010) ChIPpeakAnno: a Bioconductor package to annotate ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip data

     BMC Bioinformatics 11:237.

     https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-237

     • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Michael J Steinbaugh

   1. Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, United States
   2. Department of Genetics and Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

   Contribution

   MJS, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2403-2221

2. Sri Devi Narasimhan

   1. Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, United States
   2. Department of Genetics and Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

   Contribution

   SDN, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

3. Stacey Robida-Stubbs

   1. Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, United States
   2. Department of Genetics and Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

   Contribution

   SR-S, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

4. Lorenza E Moronetti Mazzeo

   1. Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, United States
   2. Department of Genetics and Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

   Contribution

   LEMM, Acquisition of data

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

5. Jonathan M Dreyfuss

   1. Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, United States
   2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, United States

   Contribution

   JMD, Analysis and interpretation of data

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

6. John M Hourihan

   Department of Genetics and Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

   Present address

   Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, United States

   Contribution

   JMH, Acquisition of data

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

7. Prashant Raghavan

   1. Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, United States
   2. Department of Genetics and Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

   Contribution

   PR, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

8. Theresa N Operaña

   1. Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, United States
   2. Department of Genetics and Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

   Contribution

   TNO, Acquisition of data

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

9. Reza Esmaillie

   1. Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, United States
   2. Department of Genetics and Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

   Contribution

   RE, Acquisition of data

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

10. T Keith Blackwell

    1. Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, United States
    2. Department of Genetics and Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

    Contribution

    TKB, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

    For correspondence

    keith.blackwell@joslin.harvard.edu

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

• 6,190

  views

• 1,475

  downloads

• 174

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.