1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
Download icon

Diabetes: Partners for life

  1. Lena Eliasson  Is a corresponding author
  2. Anna Wendt
  1. Lund University, Sweden
Insight
  • Cited 1
  • Views 779
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2016;5:e16798 doi: 10.7554/eLife.16798

Abstract

The hormones insulin and glucagon both play important roles in the development of diabetes.

Main text

Diabetes is a disease that causes the level of glucose in the blood to become too high. In healthy individuals, two hormones – called insulin and glucagon – work together to keep blood glucose levels within strict limits. Insulin is released when the level of glucose becomes too high, and it stimulates the removal of glucose from the blood so that it can be stored in tissues. On the other hand, glucagon is released when the level of glucose becomes too low, and it triggers the release of glucose from the tissues into the bloodstream.

Many diabetic patients are not able to produce insulin and rely on regular insulin injections to prevent their blood glucose from reaching dangerous levels (insulin-dependent diabetes). Although these injections save lives, they are not sufficient to achieve and maintain the levels of blood glucose that are found in healthy individuals. Even patients considered to have well-controlled diabetes suffer from complications that can damage many tissues in the body. The fact that diabetic patients have too little insulin, as well as uncontrolled levels of glucagon, has led to the hypothesis that diabetes is triggered by inappropriate levels of both hormones, not just insulin alone (Unger and Orci, 1975).

Both insulin and glucagon are produced in the pancreas, within structures called the Islets of Langerhans. Destroying the cells that produce insulin – known as β-cells – causes normal mice to develop diabetes. However, several researchers have recently reported that mice lacking the receptor for glucagon do not develop diabetes when their β-cells are destroyed (Conarello et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2011). These data have attracted a lot of attention since they hold the promise of a new way to treat diabetes, but the conclusions are disputed (Steenberg et al., 2016). Now, in eLife, Pedro Herrera from the University of Geneva and co-workers – including Nicolas Damond as first author – report that inhibiting the action of glucagon to treat diabetes only works if a certain number of β-cells are still present (Damond et al., 2016).

Damond et al. – who are based at the University of Geneva, Eli Lilly, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Columbia University and Vanderbilt University – made use of mice lacking the glucagon receptor and, in separate experiments, antibodies that can block glucagon signaling. Using these two strategies they were able to elegantly show that if virtually all the β-cells were destroyed, blocking the glucagon signal could not prevent diabetes. However, when the majority, but not all, of the β-cells are destroyed, blocking the glucagon signal could prevent the mice from developing diabetes.

These findings naturally raise the question of whether it is possible to treat diabetes by replacing some of the lost β-cells and administering glucagon inhibitors, instead of giving insulin injections. When faced with severe β-cell loss, the α-cells that normally only produce glucagon can convert to producing both insulin and glucagon (Thorel et al., 2010). Earlier studies show that blocking the glucagon signal increases the number of α-cells (Gelling et al., 2003). Here, Damond et al. show that α-cells are still able to convert to produce both hormones when the glucagon signal is blocked, which results in the Islet of Langerhans having a higher absolute number of α-cells that produce both insulin and glucagon.

How do these findings apply to humans? The experiments make it clear that diabetic patients who cannot produce any insulin would not benefit from a blockade of glucagon signaling. Damond et al. also alert us to the fact that a combination of insulin treatment and blockage of glucagon action might be risky. According to experiments in their laboratories, glucagon signaling is vital to reduce the risk of blood glucose levels becoming too low after insulin injections (unpublished data).

On the other hand, if a patient has enough β-cells to be able to properly respond to changes in blood glucose levels, blocking the glucagon signal might be a useful treatment strategy. Many diabetic patients are not dependent on insulin injections because their β-cells are able to produce some insulin, but not enough to meet the demand. Changes in lifestyle and diet are often effective ways to reduce symptoms in these patients, but it is possible that they could also benefit from receiving drugs that block the glucagon signal.

We know that some patients with insulin-dependent diabetes still have some functional β-cells (Ludvigsson and Heding, 1976). It is not yet clear how many β-cells would be needed for glucagon signal blockers to be an effective alternative to insulin treatment. However, recent advances in understanding how to maintain and/or increase insulin production (Carlsson et al., 2015) provide us with confidence that this milestone will eventually be reached. Although it is not clear what the ideal balance of α-cells and β-cells in the Islets of Langerhans is, the work of Damond et al. tells us that optimal control of blood glucose levels requires these cells to be partners for life.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lena Eliasson

    Unit of Islet Cell Exocytosis, Lund University Diabetes Centre, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
    For correspondence
    lena.eliasson@med.lu.se
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Anna Wendt

    Unit of Islet Cell Exocytosis, Lund University Diabetes Centre, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8807-5979

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: May 18, 2016 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2016, Eliasson et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 779
    Page views
  • 109
    Downloads
  • 1
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Hui Huang et al.
    Research Article Updated

    To assure complete tumor removal, frozen section analysis is the most common procedure for intraoperative pathological assessment of resected tumor margins. However, during one operation, multiple biopsies may be sent for examination, but only few of them are made into cryosections because of the complex preparation protocols and time-consuming pathological analysis, which potentially increases the risk of overlooking tumor involvement. Here, we propose a fluorescence-based pre-screening strategy that allows high-throughput, convenient, and fast gross assessment of resected tumor margins. A dual-activatable cationic fluorescent molecular rotor was developed to specifically illuminate live tumor cells’ cytoplasm by emitting two different fluorescence signals in response to elevations in hypoxia-induced nitroreductase (a biochemical marker) and cytoplasmic viscosity (a biophysical marker), two characteristics of cancer cells. The ability of the fluorescent molecular rotor in detecting tumor cells was evaluated in mouse and human specimens of multiple tissues by comparing with hematoxylin and eosin staining. Importantly, the fluorescent molecular rotor achieved 100 % specificity in discriminating lung and liver cancers from normal tissue, allowing pre-screening of the tumor-free surgical margins and promoting clinical decision. Altogether, this type of fluorescent molecular rotor and the proposed strategy may serve as a new option to facilitate intraoperative assessment of resected tumor margins.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cancer Biology
    E Josue Ruiz et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is a considerable global health burden, with an incidence of over 600,000 cases per year. Treatment options are limited, and patient’s 5-year survival rate is less than 5%. The ubiquitin-specific protease 28 (USP28) has been implicated in tumourigenesis through its stabilization of the oncoproteins c-MYC, c-JUN, and Δp63. Here, we show that genetic inactivation of Usp28-induced regression of established murine LSCC lung tumours. We developed a small molecule that inhibits USP28 activity in the low nanomole range. While displaying cross-reactivity against the closest homologue USP25, this inhibitor showed a high degree of selectivity over other deubiquitinases. USP28 inhibitor treatment resulted in a dramatic decrease in c-MYC, c-JUN, and Δp63 proteins levels and consequently induced substantial regression of autochthonous murine LSCC tumours and human LSCC xenografts, thereby phenocopying the effect observed by genetic deletion. Thus, USP28 may represent a promising therapeutic target for the treatment of squamous cell lung carcinoma.