The diaphragm is a dome-shaped muscle that forms the floor of the rib cage, separating the lungs from the abdomen. As we breathe in, the diaphragm contracts. This causes the chest cavity to expand, drawing air into the lungs. A pair of nerves called the phrenic nerves carry signals from the spinal cord to the diaphragm to tell it when to contract. These nerves project from the left and right sides of the spinal cord to the left and right sides of the diaphragm respectively.

The left and right sides of the diaphragm are not entirely level, but it was not known why. To investigate, Charoy et al. studied how the diaphragm develops in mouse embryos. This revealed that the left and right phrenic nerves are not symmetrical. Neither are the muscles on each side of the diaphragm. Further investigation revealed that a genetic program that establishes other differences between the left and right sides of the embryo also gives rise to the differences between the left and right sides of the diaphragm. This program switches on different genes in the left and right phrenic nerves, which activate different molecular pathways in the left and right sides of the diaphragm muscle.

The differences between the nerves and muscles on the left and right sides of the diaphragm could explain why some muscle disorders affect only one side of the diaphragm. Similarly, they could explain why congenital hernias caused by abdominal organs pushing through the diaphragm into the chest cavity mostly affect the left side of the diaphragm. Further studies are now needed to investigate these possibilities. The techniques used by Charoy et al. to map the molecular diversity of spinal cord neurons could also lead to new strategies for repairing damage to the spinal cord following injury or disease.

The diaphragm is the main respiratory muscle of mammalian organisms, separating the thoracic and abdominal cavities. Many diseases, including congenital hernia, degenerative pathologies and spinal cord injury, affect diaphragm function and thereby cause morbidity and mortality (Greer, 2013; McCool and Tzelepis, 2012). Despite the large interest given to diaphragm function in various physiological and pathological contexts (Lin et al., 2000; Misgeld et al., 2002; Strochlic et al., 2012), little attention has been paid to the embryological origin of left–right (L/R) asymmetries in diaphragm morphology and contraction, in part because they were inferred to be simply an adaptation to the structure of other, surrounding asymmetric organs such as the lungs (Laskowski et al., 1991; Whitelaw, 1987). In the present study, we investigated the origin and the mechanisms responsible for the establishment of the diaphragm asymmetries, including motor innervation by the left and right phrenic motoneurons that arise in the spinal cord at cervical levels C3 to C5 (Greer et al., 1999; Laskowski and Owens, 1994). Our findings show that both the diaphragm muscle and phrenic nerves have asymmetries, which are established independently of each other during early embryogenesis.

As many L/R asymmetries are determined prenatally (Sun et al., 2005), we analyzed the diaphragm innervation of mouse embryos on embryonic day (E) 15.5, when synaptic contacts begin to be established in this organ (Lin et al., 2001). We observed that the phrenic nerves split into primary dorsal and ventral branches when reaching the lateral muscles, whereby the distance from the end-plate to the nerve entry point differs between the left and right side and results in a characteristic ‘T’ -like pattern on the left and ‘V’ -like pattern on the right (Figure 1A; Figure 1—figure supplement 1A,B). Similar differences in the L/R branching patterns are present in the human diaphragm (Hidayet et al., 1974) (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C). Additionally, we observed an asymmetric number of branches defasciculating from the left and right primary nerves to innervate the motor end-plates (Figure 1A; Figure 1—figure supplement 1A,B). We further found that the L/R distribution of acetylcholine receptor (AchR) clusters at the nascent neuromuscular junctions also differed, with a 2.1 ± 0.2-fold increase in the medio-lateral scattering of AchR clusters on the right side of the diaphragm compared to the left side (N = 11, p<0.001 Wilcoxon) (Figure 1B; Figure 1—figure supplement 2A,B). The time course analysis revealed that these asymmetric nerve patterns arose at E12.5, concomitantly with branch formation (Figure 1C–E; Figure 1—figure supplement 3A–C). Thus, phrenic branch patterns exhibit clear asymmetries before synapse formation and fetal respiratory movements (Lin et al., 2001, 2008), and are therefore unlikely to be induced by nerve activity or muscle contraction.

Figure 1 with 3 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 1—source data 1

Left and right measures of the defasciculation distance and branch number in E13.5, E14.5 and E15.5 mouse embryos.

This file provides the mean, SEM, statistical report and individual measures used to create the histograms shown in Figure 1D, E. Defasciculation distances measured on left and right hemi-diaphragms are shown in the first sheet and numbers of secondary branches between the two primary branches on the second sheet.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18481.004

Download elife-18481-fig1-data1-v1.xlsx

We therefore asked whether diaphragm nerve asymmetry was genetically hard-wired downstream of Nodal signaling, which initiates a left-restricted transcriptional cascade to establish visceral asymmetry (Komatsu and Mishina, 2013; Nakamura and Hamada, 2012). To answer this question, we examined two complementary types of mouse mutants that have defective Nodal signaling and ensuing lung isomerism. First, we examined Pitx2^∆C/∆C embryos lacking PITX2C, a transcription factor downstream of Nodal (Essner et al., 2000; Liu et al., 2001; Schweickert et al., 2000). In the absence of PITX2C, Nodal signaling is interrupted, which causes a right pulmonary isomerism (i.e. the left lung has three main lobes like the right lung, instead of only one) (Liu et al., 2001, 2002). Second, we examined Rfx3^–/– embryos lacking RFX3, which is essential for cilia function that helps to distribute Nodal to the left side of the body. As a result, some Rfx3^–/– embryos exhibit bilateral Nodal expression and left pulmonary isomerism (i.e. the right lung has one lobe like the left lung) (Bonnafe et al., 2004). We found that diaphragm L/R nerve asymmetries were lost in both Pitx2^∆C/∆C and Rfx3^–/– embryos with impaired visceral asymmetries at E14.5 (Figure 2A–E) (number of secondary branches, Wt versus mutant with lung isomerism: PITX2C, p=4.493E-5; RFX3, p=0.002884; defasciculation distance, Wt versus mutant with lung isomerism: PITX2C, p=0.001268; RFX3, p=2.719E-6, Mann-Whitney). Thus, the Nodal pathway is essential for the establishment of diaphragm nerve asymmetry.

Figure 2

Download asset Open asset

Figure 2—source data 1

Ratios of the defasciculation distance and branch number in E14.5 mouse embryos of Pitx2C and Rfx3 lines.

The file provides the mean, SEM, statistical report and individual values used to create the histograms shown in Figure 2B, C, D and E. Branch numbers ratios found in Pitx2C^∆C/+ and Pitx2C^∆C/∆C embryos as well as those found in Rfx3^+/+ and Rfx3^–/– embryos are shown on the first and second sheet, respectively. Defasciculation distance ratios measured in Pitx2C^∆C/+ and Pitx2C^∆C/∆C embryos or in Rfx3 ^+/+ and Rfx3^–/– embryos are shown on the third and fourth sheet, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18481.011

Download elife-18481-fig2-data1-v1.xlsx

We next asked whether phrenic nerve asymmetry has an environmental origin, because it is conceivable that the lung buds confer L/R asymmetry-inducing signals to nerves that are navigating close by (Figure 3A,B). However, the analysis of Pitx2^∆C/∆C and Rfx3^–/– mutants showed that the pattern of nerve asymmetry did not always correlate with the pattern of lung asymmetry; for example, in 2/10 Pitx2^∆C/∆C embryos, nerve patterns were normal even though the lungs were isomerized (20%; Figure 3C; Figure 3—figure supplement 1A,B). Moreover, 1/13 Rfx3^–/– embryos exhibited nerve isomerism together with pulmonary situs inversus, and nerve patterns were reversed in 1/13 embryo with lung isomerism (7.7% and 7.7%; Figure 3C; Figure 3—figure supplement 1A,B). Alternatively, it is conceivable that muscle asymmetry controls nerve asymmetry. In agreement with this possibility, L/R asymmetry of the lateral diaphragm muscles was lost in both Pitx2^∆C/∆C and Rfx3^–/– mutants (Figure 3B). However, muscle width did not correlate with changes in nerve patterns in 2/10 Pitx2^∆C/∆C embryos or in 6/13 Rfx3^–/– embryos (20% and 46.2%, respectively). For example, muscle isomerism could be observed in 1/13 Rfx3^–/– embryos that have normal nerve patterns (7.7%) or in 1/13 Rfx3^–/– embryos with reversed nerve patterns (7.7%). Finally, nerves were isomerized in 2/13 Rfx3^–/– embryos that exhibit normal L/R muscle asymmetry (15.4%) (Figure 3C; Figure 3—figure supplement 1C). Together, these findings raise the possibility that phrenic motoneurons possess intrinsic L/R differences that are established independently of visceral and muscle asymmetries.

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 3—source data 1

Pool size and in vitro axon growth from left and right motoneurons.

This file provides the mean, SEM, statistical report and individual values used to create the histograms shown in Figure 3D, G and H. Left and right Oct6-labeled surfaces are shown on the first sheet. The surface and the defasciculation index of motoneurons axons (GFP+) growing from left and right explants are shown on the second and third sheet, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18481.013

Download elife-18481-fig3-data1-v1.xlsx

3D reconstructions of cervical spinal cord tissue immunolabeled with Pou3f1/Oct6, whose expression has been reported in motoneurons (Philippidou et al., 2012), did not reveal any obvious differences in the L/R organization of the cervical motoneuron pools in the spinal cord (Figure 3D–E). We therefore explanted phrenic motoneuron-enriched Hb9::GFP spinal cord tissue (Wichterle et al., 2002) to follow the behavior of motor axons as they extended from the explants independently of the surrounding organs (Figure 3—figure supplement 1D). We observed that axons explanted from right tissue extended over longer distances and were organized differently than axons explanted from left tissue (Figure 3F–H; Figure 3—figure supplement 1E–F). This observation suggests that intrinsic factors present within the ventral spinal cord confer different behaviors to left and right motoneuron axons.

To identify molecular determinants of L/R differences in phrenic axon growth, we laser-captured left versus right GFP-positive cervical motoneurons from Hb9::GFP transgenic E11 embryos for microarray analysis (Figure 4A). The presence of several markers for phrenic motoneurons (e.g. Pou3f1/Oct6, Islet1 and ALCAM) in the microarray data demonstrated the accuracy of the dissection procedure (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A–B). Consistent with the lack of obvious anatomical differences distinguishing left and right Pou3f1/Oct6⁺ cervical motoneuron populations, none of these markers had asymmetric expression levels. We further observed that amongst 22,600 transcripts expressed above background, 146 were enriched on the left and 194 on the right, with a predominance of transcripts encoding nuclear proteins (differentially enriched transcripts: right 35.56% versus left 26.02%; Figure 4B; Figure 4—source data 1 and 2). Immunoblotting confirmed that Morf4l1, a protein involved in histone acetylation/deacetylation and chromatin remodeling and reported to be essential for neural precursor proliferation and differentiation (Chen et al., 2009; Boije et al., 2013), was enriched in the left cervical motoneuron domain (L/R fold-change 1.81 ± 0.163, p=0.0022, Mann-Whitney; Figure 4C–E). Xrn2, a protein regulating RNA processing and miR stability that regulates miR expression in neurons (Kinjo et al., 2013), was also enriched in the left cervical motoneuron domain (L/R fold-change 1.37 ± 0.13, p=0.028; Mann-Whitney; Figure 4—figure supplement 1C). Thus, cervical motoneurons are intrinsically L/R-specified.

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 4—source data 1

List of enriched genes in the left cervical motor neurons of HB9::GFP embryos at E11.5.

Genes are included on this list if the average change in expression was > 1.5 (or −0.58< in log2) between the left and right sides. The listed genes had the same enrichment trend in all embryos with a fold-change > 1.5 in at least in two embryos.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18481.017

Download elife-18481-fig4-data1-v1.xlsx

Figure 4—source data 2

List of enriched genes in the right cervical motor neurons of HB9::GFP embryos at E11.5.

Genes are included in the list if the average change in expression was > 1.5 (or > 0.58 in log2) between the right and left sides. The listed genes had the same enrichment trend in all embryos with a fold-change superior to 1.5 in at least in two embryos.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18481.018

Download elife-18481-fig4-data2-v1.xlsx

Figure 4—source data 3

Lateralization expression of Morf4l1 in cervical motoneurons.

This file provides the statistical reports and individual values used to create the ladder graphs shown in Figure 4C and E. RNA expression is shown on the first sheet. Normalized protein levels are shown on the second sheet.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18481.019

Download elife-18481-fig4-data3-v1.xlsx

To determine whether molecular differences in L/R specification manifest themselves in differential axon guidance responses, we studied mice lacking Slit/Robo signaling, which is known to regulate the fasciculation of phrenic axons (Jaworski and Tessier-Lavigne, 2012). In agreement with prior reports, we observed defective nerve defasciculation in Robo1^–/–;Robo2^–/– double mutants (Figure 5A). Notably, defasciculation of the left nerve was as high as that of the right nerve and assumed a similar pattern in the left and right diaphragm, rather than adopting the normal asymmetric pattern seen in wild-type littermates (Figure 5A). Partial symmetrization was observed in double heterozygous mutants, indicating concentration-dependent sensitivity of phrenic nerve axons to Slit signals (Figure 5A).

Figure 5 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 5—source data 1

Slit/Robo signalling controls asymmetry of L/R phrenic nerves and Robo1 exhibits different processing levels in left and right cervical motoneurons.

This file provides the statistical report and individual values used to create the histograms and ladder graphs shown in Figure 5A, B, C, D and E. The ratios of branch numbers and defasciculation distances in Robo1^+/+ and Robo2^+/+, Robo1^+/– and Robo2^+/– and Robo1^–/– and Robo2^–/– embryos are shown on the first and second sheets. The third sheet contains left and right normalized values of short Robo1 forms presented in the graph of Figure 5B. RNA levels of Mmp2 are shown on fourth sheet. The percentage of left and right motoneurons (Islet+) exhibiting gelatinase activity from wild-type embryos are shown on fifth sheet and the ratio found in Rfx3^–/– embryos with lung isomerism and Rfx3^+/+ and Rfx3^+/– on the sixth sheet. Branch number and defasciculation distance ratio measured in Mmp2^+/+ and Mmp2^–/– embryos are shown on the seventh and eighth sheets.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18481.023

Download elife-18481-fig5-data1-v1.xlsx

To determine whether differential levels of Slit/Robo signaling dictate the L/R pattern of phrenic nerve fasciculation, we examined their transcript levels, but found no evidence for lateralized expression of the transcripts for Robo1, the major regulator of diaphragm innervation (Jaworski and Tessier-Lavigne, 2012), or the ligands of Robo1: Slit1, Slit2 and Slit3 (Figure 5—figure supplement 1A–B). By contrast, we identified L/R differences in Robo1 protein by immunoblotting of phrenic motor neuron-enriched cervical spinal cord tissue. Robo1 was detected in one long and two short forms (Figure 5—figure supplement 1C), whereby the long Robo1 form migrating as a 250 kDa protein was enriched in the left samples and the short forms migrating as 120 kDa and 130 kDa proteins were enriched in the right samples (R/L ratio— 1.22 ± 0.1, p=0.01587; Mann-Whitney, Figure 5B, Figure 5—figure supplement 1D). Even though 12 alternatively spliced isoforms have been predicted for mouse Robo1, the predicted changes in protein sequence are unlikely to account for the short forms we observed in our immunoblots, because they are predicted to change the molecular weight by just 7.1 kDa. However, both human and drosophila Robo1 have been shown to be processed by metalloproteases (Seki et al., 2010; Coleman et al., 2010), and potential cleavage fragments have been reported in mouse brain tissues (Clark et al., 2002). These findings raise the possibility that differential post-translation processing of Robo proteins may be involved in creating L/R asymmetries in diaphragm innervations.

Next, we investigated whether axon guidance effectors that were revealed by our transcriptomic analysis to exhibit asymmetric expression levels could also contribute to the L/R phrenic nerve patterns. Given that metalloproteases have emerged as important regulators of axonal behaviors during development and regeneration (Bai and Pfaff, 2011; Łukaszewicz-Zając et al., 2014; Small and Crawford, 2016; Verslegers et al., 2013b), we concentrated on these effectors. Consistent with previous expression data (GSE41013) (Philippidou et al., 2012), our transcriptome analysis indicated that cervical motoneurons express several metalloproteases. Interestingly, among the 7 Mmps and 13 ADAMs expressed by cervical motoneurons, Mmp2 and ADAM17 were expressed at higher levels in the right motoneurons. We focused on MMP2 because it was shown to control axon development in mouse and motor axon fasciculation in drosophila (Miller et al., 2011; Gaublomme et al., 2014; Zuo et al., 1998; Miller et al., 2008).

The microarray analysis showed that Mmp2 transcripts were enriched in the Hb9-positive right motoneurons, which was confirmed using qRT-PCR and quantitative in situ hybridization (log2(R/L) Embryo 1 — 0.22 ± 0.08; Embryo 2 — 0.63 ± 0.11, RNAscope) (Figure 5C; Figure 5—figure supplement 2A–D). Moreover, in situ zymography with DQ-Gelatin (Hill et al., 2012), which is effectively cleaved by MMP2 (Snoek-van Beurden and Von den Hoff, 2005), showed that gelatinase activity on the axon shaft and growth cones was 1.6 times higher in right than in left motoneuron cultures (Figure 5D; Figure 5—figure supplement 2E). Remarkably, this difference was absent in motoneuron cultures prepared from Rfx3^–/– embryos with phenotypic left isomerism (Figure 5D). These results provide evidence that the differential L/R MMP activity is controlled by the Nodal pathway and further suggest that MMP2 contributes to the establishment of phrenic nerve asymmetry.

We therefore analyzed the diaphragm nerve patterns in Mmp2^–/– mice (Itoh et al., 1997). At E14.5, Mmp2^–/– embryos exhibited normal lung asymmetry and well-developed phrenic branches on both sides (Figure 5E). Interestingly, we observed a partial symmetrization of the phrenic branches, with a right pattern that resembled the one observed on the left in control littermates in E14.5 Mmp2^–/– embryos (Figure 5E). Thus, higher right MMP2 activity could contribute to promote the right pattern of phrenic nerve defasciculation.

Taken together, our work shows that the first asymmetry instruction in diaphragm patterning is provided by early Nodal signaling, which sets the L/R axis and visceral asymmetry of the embryo. Beyond this early mechanism, phrenic motoneurons have an intrinsic, genetically encoded L/R asymmetry that manifests itself in the differential activation of molecules that have key roles in axon guidance, including Robo1 and MMP2.

Future work should aim to address how and at which stage phrenic motoneurons are imprinted. For example, an early Nodal signal might be propagated from the lateral plate mesoderm (LPM) to the cervical spinal cord. In agreement with this idea, it has been suggested that Lefty expression in the prospective floor plate of the neural tube prevents Nodal diffusion to the left LPM (Shiratori and Hamada, 2006). Moreover, Lefty expression is confined to the left prospective floor plate and is reversed or expanded bilaterally in ‘iv’ or ‘inv’ mutants, which exhibit reverse visceral asymmetry (Meno et al., 1997). Given the key role of the floor plate in the patterning and specification of spinal cord neuronal lineages (Goulding et al., 1993; Placzek et al., 1991), left and right floor plate cells might also differently imprint left and right spinal cord. Alternatively, or additionally, endothelial cells invading the ventral spinal cord could convey early Nodal signaling from the LPM to the spinal cord. Indeed, these cells exhibit L/R asymmetries that can be preserved during their migration (Chi et al., 2003; Klessinger and Christ, 1996). The resulting L/R imprints could occur early on during neurogenesis or later on during motoneuron differentiation. The two hypothesizes might not be exclusive. Indeed, recent work in zebrafish habenula suggests that differences in both the timing of neurogenesis and exposure to lateralized signal during neuron differentiation act in parallel to set L/R asymmetries (Hüsken et al., 2014). Interestingly, early imprinting of progenitors in Caenorhabditis elegans induces an epigenetic mark for L/R identity that drives differential genetic programs during neuron differentiation (Cochella and Hobert, 2012; O'Meara et al., 2010).

Our work provides evidence to show that a L/R imprint confers specific axon behaviors to the left and right phrenic motoneurons. For example, we found that Slit/Robo signaling is required for the establishment of asymmetric nerve patterns, which suggests that left and right phrenic motoneurons have different Slit/Robo signaling levels. Interestingly, Slit/Robo signaling has previously been shown to control phrenic axon fasciculation (Jaworski and Tessier-Lavigne, 2012). Consistent with an intrinsic control of Slit/Robo signaling as the cause of this axonal asymmetry, we discovered L/R differences in Robo1 protein in motoneurons, which may arise through differential proteolysis and may help to modulate responsiveness to Slit signaling, even though Slit and Robo genes are expressed similarly in the left and right motoneuron pools. In support of the idea that differential proteolysis contributes to the emergence of different Robo1 forms in the left and right phrenic motoneuron pools, Robo processing has previously been reported in other contexts (Seki et al., 2010; Coleman et al., 2010). This Robo1 processing could have different outcomes on Slit/Robo signaling. In drosophila, cleavage of Robo by ADAM10 is required for recruitment of downstream signaling molecules and the axon guidance response (Coleman et al., 2010). Metalloproteases can also decrease the amount of available receptors and/or terminate adhesion and signaling (Bai and Pfaff, 2011; Hinkle et al., 2006; Romi et al., 2014; Hattori et al., 2000; Gatto et al., 2014).

Slit/Robo signaling can control many different aspects of axon development, such as axon growth, branching, guidance or fasciculation. As primary and secondary branches are formed by selective defasciculation and because Slit/Robo signaling controls phrenic axon fasciculation, our interpretation is that the different Slit/Robo signaling abilities of left and right phrenic axons result in different axon–axon fasciculation states, with right axons having greater defasciculation behavior than the left ones. Alternatively, the Slit/Robo pathway may differentially regulate axon and branch growth, or branch trajectories, as it does for other systems of neuronal projections (Wang et al., 1999; Brose et al., 1999; Blockus and Chédotal, 2016). These ideas have to be taken cautiously. Differential Robo forms were assessed from spinal cord tissue essentially containing neuronal soma, and not peripheral phrenic axons. Furthermore, the tissue samples, although enriched in phrenic motoneurons by the procedure, contained additional neuronal sub-types. Further investigations are thus needed to assess with more specific tools Robo protein dynamics and distribution along phrenic axons and in the growth cones. This work will provide a better characterization of the functional outcome determined by the balance of short and long Robo forms in the establishment of phrenic nerve patterns.

Asymmetries in several genes implicated in axon guidance were observed in our transcriptome analysis. In particular, we found differences in the expression of regulators of guidance receptors activities, such as metalloproteases. Mmp2 expression level and gelatinase activity were found to be higher in right cervical motoneurons. Moreover, differential gelatinase activity between left and right motoneurons was lost in cultures from Rfx3^–/-– mutants with symmetrical Nodal signaling, suggesting that early Nodal signaling impacts on gelatinase activity in motoneurons. Mmp2 genetic loss reduced the asymmetry of the diaphragm branch pattern, suggesting that asymmetric expression of Mmp2 in motoneurons contributes to set phrenic nerve patterns.

However, in contrast to embryos lacking Pitx2 and Rfx3, embryos lacking Mmp2 only exhibited a partial symmetrization of the phrenic nerve branches. Rfx3 and Pitx2C transcription factors act at the onset of the left–right imprinting, and their genetic loss is therefore expected to abolish the entire program of L/R nerve asymmetry. By contrast, the subsequent construction of individual neuronal circuits relies on the concerted action of many different signaling pathways, whereby loss of a single pathway is not expected to disrupt the entire asymmetry program. The partial defect may be due to the presence of other effectors of the Nodal pathway that contribute to L/R nerve asymmetries independently of MMP processing, to the co-expression of several MMPs acting with partial redundancies with each other (Prudova et al., 2010; Kukreja et al., 2015) and to the fact that MMPs have many different substrates with potentially opposite effects on the same biological process. For example, proteomic studies have identified more than 40 secreted and transmembrane substrates for MMP2 (Dean and Overall, 2007), of which we found 32 to be expressed in cervical motoneurons including Adam17, which is enriched in right motoneurons (Figure 5—figure supplement 2F, Figure 4—source data 2).

The MMP substrates that are responsible for asymmetric phrenic nerve patterning remain to be determined, but Slit/Robo signaling appears to be an obvious candidate. First, cleavage of human Robo1 has been suggested to be MMP-dependent, although in drosophila, Robo1 is cleaved by Adam10/Kuzbanian (Coleman et al., 2010; Seki et al., 2010). Second, short forms of Robo1, lprobably generated by proteolysis, are enriched in right motoneurons, in which MMP activity is the highest. In support, incubation of cervical spinal cord tissue with active MMP2 significantly increased the short Robo1 forms (fold change: 1.60 ± 0.23, p=0.00285, Mann-Whitney, four independent western blots, Supplementary file 1). Nevertheless, the L/R ratio of Robo protein forms in cervical motoneuron tissue collected from Mmp2 null embryos, although showing a tendency towards reduction, was not statistically different from the wild-type ratio (WT: 1.22 ± 0.10, N = 5; Mmp2^–/–: 1.14 ± 0.01, N = 3; p=0.78, Mann-Whitney; Supplementary file 2). This might be due to an insufficient number of tested embryos. Alternatively, because short Robo1 forms were still detected, this L/R ratio might rather reflect the activity of other proteases, either compensating for MMP2 loss or also contributing to Robo processing.

An additional MMP candidate is NCAM, which is highly expressed by developing phrenic axons, controls axon-axon fasciculation, and is cleaved by MMPs (Dean and Overall, 2007; Hinkle et al., 2006). In the light of MMP redundancy and the possible involvement of other proteases in the processing of axon guidance receptors and their ligands, the in vivo assessment of these hypotheses will be challenging.

Finally, the genetic program for L/R identity in spinal cord motoneurons that we have described here may provide important insights into motoneuron development and diseases. For example, the L/R imprinting of spinal motoneuron might also explain why right-sided fetal forelimb movements are far more frequent than left-sided movements at developmental stages when motoneurons have not yet received any input from higher brain centers (Hepper et al., 1998). In addition, our description of early events controlling diaphragm formation may have broad implications for our understanding of several human conditions. Examples include congenital hernias, which generally affect the left hemi-diaphragm and can cause perinatal lethality (Pober, 2008), and some types of congenital myopathies that impair diaphragm function only on one side (Grogan et al., 2005). Our data thus provide a novel basis for investigations of molecular diversity in spinal cord neurons and for functional studies of diaphragm physiology and pathology.

1. 1. Julien Falk
   2. Muriel Bozon
   3. Valerie Castellani
   4. Catherine Rey
   5. Séverine Croze
   6. Joel Lachuer

   (2017) Comparaison of left and right cervical motoneurons transcriptome

   Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE84778).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE84778

1. 1. Bai G
   2. Pfaff SL

   (2011) Protease regulation: the yin and yang of neural development and disease

   Neuron 72:9–21.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.012

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Blockus H
   2. Chédotal A

   (2016) Slit-robo signaling

   Development 143:3037–3044.

   https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.132829

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Boije H
   2. Ring H
   3. Shirazi Fard S
   4. Grundberg I
   5. Nilsson M
   6. Hallböök F

   (2013) Alternative splicing of the chromodomain protein Morf4l1 pre-mRNA has implications on cell differentiation in the developing chicken retina

   Journal of Molecular Neuroscience 51:615–628.

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-013-0034-4

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Bonnafe E
   2. Touka M
   3. AitLounis A
   4. Baas D
   5. Barras E
   6. Ucla C
   7. Moreau A
   8. Flamant F
   9. Dubruille R
   10. Couble P
   11. Collignon J
   12. Durand B
   13. Reith W

   (2004) The transcription factor RFX3 directs nodal cilium development and left-right asymmetry specification

   Molecular and Cellular Biology 24:4417–4427.

   https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.10.4417-4427.2004

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Brose K
   2. Bland KS
   3. Wang KH
   4. Arnott D
   5. Henzel W
   6. Goodman CS
   7. Tessier-Lavigne M
   8. Kidd T

   (1999) Slit proteins bind robo receptors and have an evolutionarily conserved role in repulsive axon guidance

   Cell 96:795–806.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80590-5

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Charoy C
   2. Nawabi H
   3. Reynaud F
   4. Derrington E
   5. Bozon M
   6. Wright K
   7. Falk J
   8. Helmbacher F
   9. Kindbeiter K
   10. Castellani V

   (2012) Gdnf activates midline repulsion by Semaphorin3B via NCAM during commissural axon guidance

   Neuron 75:1051–1066.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.021

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Chen M
   2. Takano-Maruyama M
   3. Pereira-Smith OM
   4. Gaufo GO
   5. Tominaga K

   (2009) MRG15, a component of HAT and HDAC complexes, is essential for proliferation and differentiation of neural precursor cells

   Journal of Neuroscience Research 87:1522–1531.

   https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.21976

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Chi JT
   2. Chang HY
   3. Haraldsen G
   4. Jahnsen FL
   5. Troyanskaya OG
   6. Chang DS
   7. Wang Z
   8. Rockson SG
   9. van de Rijn M
   10. Botstein D
   11. Brown PO

   (2003) Endothelial cell diversity revealed by global expression profiling

   PNAS 100:10623–10628.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1434429100

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Clark K
   2. Hammond E
   3. Rabbitts P

   (2002) Temporal and spatial expression of two isoforms of the Dutt1/Robo1 gene in mouse development

   FEBS Letters 523:12–16.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02904-6

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Cochella L
    2. Hobert O

    (2012) Embryonic priming of a miRNA locus predetermines postmitotic neuronal left/right asymmetry in C. elegans

    Cell 151:1229–1242.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.049

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Cohen S
    2. Funkelstein L
    3. Livet J
    4. Rougon G
    5. Henderson CE
    6. Castellani V
    7. Mann F

    (2005) A semaphorin code defines subpopulations of spinal motor neurons during mouse development

    European Journal of Neuroscience 21:1767–1776.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04021.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Coleman HA
    2. Labrador JP
    3. Chance RK
    4. Bashaw GJ

    (2010) The Adam family metalloprotease kuzbanian regulates the cleavage of the roundabout receptor to control axon repulsion at the midline

    Development 137:2417–2426.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.047993

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Dean RA
    2. Overall CM

    (2007) Proteomics discovery of metalloproteinase substrates in the cellular context by iTRAQ labeling reveals a diverse MMP-2 substrate degradome

    Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 6:611–623.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M600341-MCP200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Delloye-Bourgeois C
    2. Jacquier A
    3. Charoy C
    4. Reynaud F
    5. Nawabi H
    6. Thoinet K
    7. Kindbeiter K
    8. Yoshida Y
    9. Zagar Y
    10. Kong Y
    11. Jones YE
    12. Falk J
    13. Chédotal A
    14. Castellani V

    (2015) PlexinA1 is a new slit receptor and mediates axon guidance function of Slit C-terminal fragments

    Nature Neuroscience 18:36–45.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3893

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Essner JJ
    2. Branford WW
    3. Zhang J
    4. Yost HJ

    (2000)

    Mesendoderm and left-right brain, heart and gut development are differentially regulated by pitx2 isoforms

    Development 127:1081–1093.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Gatto G
    2. Morales D
    3. Kania A
    4. Klein R

    (2014) EphA4 receptor shedding regulates spinal motor axon guidance

    Current Biology 24:2355–2365.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.08.028

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Gaublomme D
    2. Buyens T
    3. De Groef L
    4. Stakenborg M
    5. Janssens E
    6. Ingvarsen S
    7. Porse A
    8. Behrendt N
    9. Moons L

    (2014) Matrix metalloproteinase 2 and membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase co-regulate axonal outgrowth of mouse retinal ganglion cells

    Journal of Neurochemistry 129:966–979.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.12703

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Goulding MD
    2. Lumsden A
    3. Gruss P

    (1993) Signals from the notochord and floor plate regulate the region-specific expression of two pax genes in the developing spinal cord

    Trends in Genetics 117:233–1016.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9525(93)90082-S

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Greer JJ
    2. Allan DW
    3. Martin-Caraballo M
    4. Lemke RP

    (1999)

    An overview of phrenic nerve and diaphragm muscle development in the perinatal rat

    Journal of Applied Physiology 86:779–786.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Greer JJ

    (2013) Current concepts on the pathogenesis and etiology of congenital diaphragmatic hernia

    Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology 189:232–240.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2013.04.015

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Grogan PM
    2. Tanner SM
    3. Ørstavik KH
    4. Knudsen GP
    5. Saperstein DS
    6. Vogel H
    7. Barohn RJ
    8. Herbelin LL
    9. McVey AL
    10. Katz JS

    (2005) Myopathy with skeletal asymmetry and hemidiaphragm elevation is caused by myotubularin mutations

    Neurology 64:1638–1640.

    https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000160393.99621.D0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Hattori M
    2. Osterfield M
    3. Flanagan JG

    (2000) Regulated cleavage of a contact-mediated axon repellent

    Science 289:1360–1365.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5483.1360

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Hepper PG
    2. McCartney GR
    3. Shannon EA

    (1998) Lateralised behaviour in first trimester human foetuses

    Neuropsychologia 36:531–534.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00156-5

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Hidayet MA
    2. Wahid HA
    3. Wilson AS

    (1974) Investigations on the innervation of the human diaphragm

    The Anatomical Record 179:507–516.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091790411

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Hill JW
    2. Poddar R
    3. Thompson JF
    4. Rosenberg GA
    5. Yang Y

    (2012) Intranuclear matrix metalloproteinases promote DNA damage and apoptosis induced by oxygen-glucose deprivation in neurons

    Neuroscience 220:277–290.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.06.019

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Hinkle CL
    2. Diestel S
    3. Lieberman J
    4. Maness PF

    (2006) Metalloprotease-induced ectodomain shedding of neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM)

    Journal of Neurobiology 66:1378–1395.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.20257

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Huber AB
    2. Kania A
    3. Tran TS
    4. Gu C
    5. De Marco Garcia N
    6. Lieberam I
    7. Johnson D
    8. Jessell TM
    9. Ginty DD
    10. Kolodkin AL

    (2005) Distinct roles for secreted semaphorin signaling in spinal motor axon guidance

    Neuron 48:949–964.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.12.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Hüsken U
    2. Stickney HL
    3. Gestri G
    4. Bianco IH
    5. Faro A
    6. Young RM
    7. Roussigne M
    8. Hawkins TA
    9. Beretta CA
    10. Brinkmann I
    11. Paolini A
    12. Jacinto R
    13. Albadri S
    14. Dreosti E
    15. Tsalavouta M
    16. Schwarz Q
    17. Cavodeassi F
    18. Barth AK
    19. Wen L
    20. Zhang B
    21. Blader P
    22. Yaksi E
    23. Poggi L
    24. Zigman M
    25. Lin S
    26. Wilson SW
    27. Carl M

    (2014) Tcf7l2 is required for left-right asymmetric differentiation of habenular neurons

    Current Biology 24:2217–2227.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.08.006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Itoh T
    2. Ikeda T
    3. Gomi H
    4. Nakao S
    5. Suzuki T
    6. Itohara S

    (1997) Unaltered secretion of beta-amyloid precursor protein in gelatinase A (matrix metalloproteinase 2)-deficient mice

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 272:22389–22392.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.36.22389

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Jaworski A
    2. Tessier-Lavigne M

    (2012) Autocrine/juxtaparacrine regulation of axon fasciculation by slit-robo signaling

    Nature Neuroscience 15:367–369.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3037

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Kinjo ER
    2. Higa GS
    3. de Sousa E
    4. Casado OA
    5. Damico MV
    6. Britto LR
    7. Kihara AH

    (2013) A possible new mechanism for the control of miRNA expression in neurons

    Experimental Neurology 248:546–558.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.07.022

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Klessinger S
    2. Christ B

    (1996) Axial structures control laterality in the distribution pattern of endothelial cells

    Anatomy and Embryology 193:319–330.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186689

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Komatsu Y
    2. Mishina Y

    (2013) Establishment of left-right asymmetry in vertebrate development: the node in mouse embryos

    Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 70:4659–4666.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-013-1399-9

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Kukreja M
    2. Shiryaev SA
    3. Cieplak P
    4. Muranaka N
    5. Routenberg DA
    6. Chernov AV
    7. Kumar S
    8. Remacle AG
    9. Smith JW
    10. Kozlov IA
    11. Strongin AY

    (2015) High-throughput multiplexed peptide-centric profiling illustrates both substrate cleavage redundancy and specificity in the MMP family

    Chemistry and Biology 22:1122–1133.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.07.008

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Laskowski MB
    2. Norton AS
    3. Berger PK

    (1991) Branching patterns of the rat phrenic nerve during development and reinnervation

    Experimental Neurology 113:212–220.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4886(91)90177-E

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Laskowski MB
    2. Owens JL

    (1994) Embryonic expression of motoneuron topography in the rat diaphragm muscle

    Developmental Biology 166:502–508.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1994.1333

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Lin S
    2. Landmann L
    3. Ruegg MA
    4. Brenner HR

    (2008) The role of nerve- versus muscle-derived factors in mammalian neuromuscular junction formation

    Journal of Neuroscience 28:3333–3340.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5590-07.2008

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Lin W
    2. Burgess RW
    3. Dominguez B
    4. Pfaff SL
    5. Sanes JR
    6. Lee KF

    (2001) Distinct roles of nerve and muscle in postsynaptic differentiation of the neuromuscular synapse

    Nature 410:1057–1064.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/35074025

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Lin W
    2. Sanchez HB
    3. Deerinck T
    4. Morris JK
    5. Ellisman M
    6. Lee KF

    (2000) Aberrant development of motor axons and neuromuscular synapses in erbB2-deficient mice

    PNAS 97:1299–1304.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.3.1299

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Liu C
    2. Liu W
    3. Lu MF
    4. Brown NA
    5. Martin JF

    (2001)

    Regulation of left-right asymmetry by thresholds of Pitx2c activity

    Development 128:2039–2048.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Liu C
    2. Liu W
    3. Palie J
    4. Lu MF
    5. Brown NA
    6. Martin JF

    (2002)

    Pitx2c patterns anterior myocardium and aortic arch vessels and is required for local cell movement into atrioventricular cushions

    Development 129:5081–5091.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Łukaszewicz-Zając M
    2. Mroczko B
    3. Słowik A

    (2014) Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their tissue inhibitors (TIMPs) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)

    Journal of Neural Transmission 121:1387–1397.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-014-1205-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. McCool FD
    2. Tzelepis GE

    (2012) Dysfunction of the diaphragm

    New England Journal of Medicine 366:932–942.

    https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1007236

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Meno C
    2. Ito Y
    3. Saijoh Y
    4. Matsuda Y
    5. Tashiro K
    6. Kuhara S
    7. Hamada H

    (1997) Two closely-related left-right asymmetrically expressed genes, lefty-1 and lefty-2: their distinct expression domains, chromosomal linkage and direct neuralizing activity in xenopus embryos

    Genes to Cells 2:513–524.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2443.1997.1400338.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Miller CM
    2. Liu N
    3. Page-McCaw A
    4. Broihier HT

    (2011) Drosophila MMP2 regulates the matrix molecule faulty attraction (Frac) to promote motor axon targeting in Drosophila

    Journal of Neuroscience 31:5335–5347.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4811-10.2011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Miller CM
    2. Page-McCaw A
    3. Broihier HT

    (2008) Matrix metalloproteinases promote motor axon fasciculation in the Drosophila embryo

    Development 135:95–109.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.011072

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Misgeld T
    2. Burgess RW
    3. Lewis RM
    4. Cunningham JM
    5. Lichtman JW
    6. Sanes JR

    (2002) Roles of neurotransmitter in synapse formation: development of neuromuscular junctions lacking choline acetyltransferase

    Neuron 36:635–648.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01020-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Moret F
    2. Renaudot C
    3. Bozon M
    4. Castellani V

    (2007) Semaphorin and neuropilin co-expression in motoneurons sets axon sensitivity to environmental semaphorin sources during motor axon pathfinding

    Development 134:4491–4501.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.011452

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Nakamura T
    2. Hamada H

    (2012) Left-right patterning: conserved and divergent mechanisms

    Development 139:3257–3262.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.061606

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. O'Meara MM
    2. Zhang F
    3. Hobert O

    (2010) Maintenance of neuronal laterality in caenorhabditis elegans through MYST histone acetyltransferase complex components LSY-12, LSY-13 and LIN-49

    Genetics 186:1497–1502.

    https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.110.123661

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Philippidou P
    2. Walsh CM
    3. Aubin J
    4. Jeannotte L
    5. Dasen JS

    (2012) Sustained Hox5 gene activity is required for respiratory motor neuron development

    Nature Neuroscience 15:1636–1644.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3242

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Placzek M
    2. Yamada T
    3. Tessier-Lavigne M
    4. Jessell T
    5. Dodd J

    (1991)

    Control of dorsoventral pattern in vertebrate neural development: induction and polarizing properties of the floor plate

    Development (Cambridge, England). Supplement Suppl 2:105–122.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Pober BR

    (2008) Genetic aspects of human congenital diaphragmatic hernia

    Clinical Genetics 74:1–15.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01031.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Prudova A
    2. auf dem Keller U
    3. Butler GS
    4. Overall CM

    (2010) Multiplex N-terminome analysis of MMP-2 and MMP-9 substrate degradomes by iTRAQ-TAILS quantitative proteomics

    Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 9:894–911.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M000050-MCP201

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Romi E
    2. Gokhman I
    3. Wong E
    4. Antonovsky N
    5. Ludwig A
    6. Sagi I
    7. Saftig P
    8. Tessier-Lavigne M
    9. Yaron A

    (2014) ADAM Metalloproteases promote a developmental switch in responsiveness to the axonal repellant Sema3A

    Nature Communications 5:4058.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5058

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Schweickert A
    2. Campione1 M
    3. Steinbeisser H
    4. Blum M

    (2000) Pitx2 isoforms: involvement of Pitx2c but not Pitx2a or Pitx2b in vertebrate left-right asymmetry

    Mechanisms of Development 90:41–51.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4773(99)00227-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Sclafani AM
    2. Skidmore JM
    3. Ramaprakash H
    4. Trumpp A
    5. Gage PJ
    6. Martin DM

    (2006) Nestin-cre mediated deletion of Pitx2 in the mouse

    Genesis 44:336–344.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20220

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Seki M
    2. Watanabe A
    3. Enomoto S
    4. Kawamura T
    5. Ito H
    6. Kodama T
    7. Hamakubo T
    8. Aburatani H

    (2010) Human ROBO1 is cleaved by metalloproteinases and gamma-secretase and migrates to the nucleus in Cancer cells

    FEBS Letters 584:2909–2915.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2010.05.009

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Shiratori H
    2. Hamada H

    (2006) The left-right Axis in the mouse: from origin to morphology

    Development 133:2095–2104.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.02384

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Small CD
    2. Crawford BD

    (2016) Matrix metalloproteinases in neural development: a phylogenetically diverse perspective

    Neural Regeneration Research 11:357–362.

    https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.179030

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Snoek-van Beurden PA
    2. Von den Hoff JW

    (2005) Zymographic techniques for the analysis of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors

    BioTechniques 38:73–83.

    https://doi.org/10.2144/05381RV01

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Strochlic L
    2. Falk J
    3. Goillot E
    4. Sigoillot S
    5. Bourgeois F
    6. Delers P
    7. Rouvière J
    8. Swain A
    9. Castellani V
    10. Schaeffer L
    11. Legay C

    (2012) Wnt4 participates in the formation of vertebrate neuromuscular junction

    PLoS One 7:e29976.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029976

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Sun T
    2. Patoine C
    3. Abu-Khalil A
    4. Visvader J
    5. Sum E
    6. Cherry TJ
    7. Orkin SH
    8. Geschwind DH
    9. Walsh CA

    (2005) Early asymmetry of gene transcription in embryonic human left and right cerebral cortex

    Science 308:1794–1798.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1110324

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Torres-Espín A
    2. Santos D
    3. González-Pérez F
    4. del Valle J
    5. Navarro X

    (2014) Neurite-J: an image-J plug-in for axonal growth analysis in organotypic cultures

    Journal of Neuroscience Methods 236:26–39.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.08.005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Verslegers M
    2. Lemmens K
    3. Van Hove I
    4. Moons L

    (2013b) Matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 as promising benefactors in development, plasticity and repair of the nervous system

    Progress in Neurobiology 105:60–78.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.03.004

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Verslegers M
    2. Van Hove I
    3. Buyens T
    4. Dekeyster E
    5. Knevels E
    6. Moons L

    (2013a) Identification of MMP-2 as a novel enhancer of cerebellar granule cell proliferation

    Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience 57:63–72.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcn.2013.10.001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Wang KH
    2. Brose K
    3. Arnott D
    4. Kidd T
    5. Goodman CS
    6. Henzel W
    7. Tessier-Lavigne M

    (1999) Biochemical purification of a mammalian slit protein as a positive regulator of sensory axon elongation and branching

    Cell 96:771–784.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80588-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Whitelaw WA

    (1987)

    Shape and size of the human diaphragm in vivo

    Journal of Applied Physiology 62:180–186.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Wichterle H
    2. Lieberam I
    3. Porter JA
    4. Jessell TM

    (2002) Directed differentiation of embryonic stem cells into motor neurons

    Cell 110:385–397.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00835-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Zuo J
    2. Ferguson TA
    3. Hernandez YJ
    4. Stetler-Stevenson WG
    5. Muir D

    (1998)

    Neuronal matrix metalloproteinase-2 degrades and inactivates a neurite-inhibiting chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan

    Journal of Neuroscience 18:5203–5211.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Camille Charoy

   University of Lyon, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, INMG UMR CNRS 5310, INSERM U1217, Lyon, France

   Contribution

   CC, performed the experiments, analyzed the results and contributed to writing the manuscript

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

2. Sarah Dinvaut

   University of Lyon, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, INMG UMR CNRS 5310, INSERM U1217, Lyon, France

   Contribution

   SD, performed the experiments and analyzed the results

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

3. Yohan Chaix

   University of Lyon, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, INMG UMR CNRS 5310, INSERM U1217, Lyon, France

   Contribution

   YC, performed the experiments and analyzed the results

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

4. Laurette Morlé

   University of Lyon, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, INMG UMR CNRS 5310, INSERM U1217, Lyon, France

   Contribution

   LMor, provided embryos and provided information for protocols

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

5. Isabelle Sanyas

   University of Lyon, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, INMG UMR CNRS 5310, INSERM U1217, Lyon, France

   Contribution

   IS, performed the experiments and analyzed the results

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

6. Muriel Bozon

   University of Lyon, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, INMG UMR CNRS 5310, INSERM U1217, Lyon, France

   Contribution

   MB, performed the experiments and analyzed the results

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

7. Karine Kindbeiter

   University of Lyon, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, INMG UMR CNRS 5310, INSERM U1217, Lyon, France

   Contribution

   KK, performed the experiments and analyzed the results

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

8. Bénédicte Durand

   University of Lyon, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, INMG UMR CNRS 5310, INSERM U1217, Lyon, France

   Contribution

   BD, provided embryos and provided information for protocols

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

9. Jennifer M Skidmore

   1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, United States
   2. Department of Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, United States

   Contribution

   JMS, provided embryos and provided information for protocols

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

10. Lies De Groef

    Animal Physiology and Neurobiology Section, Department of Biology, Laboratory of Neural Circuit Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium

    Contribution

    LDG, provided embryos and information for protocols

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

11. Motoaki Seki

    Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Contribution

    MS, provided antibodies and information for protocols

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

12. Lieve Moons

    Animal Physiology and Neurobiology Section, Department of Biology, Laboratory of Neural Circuit Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium

    Contribution

    LMoo, provided embryos and information for protocols

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

13. Christiana Ruhrberg

    UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom

    Contribution

    CR, provided embryos and information for protocols and wrote the manuscript

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

14. James F Martin

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States

    Contribution

    JFM, provided embryos

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

15. Donna M Martin

    1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, United States
    2. Department of Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, United States
    3. Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, United States

    Contribution

    DMM, provided embryos, provided information for protocols and contributed to writing of the manuscript

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

16. Julien Falk

    University of Lyon, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, INMG UMR CNRS 5310, INSERM U1217, Lyon, France

    Contribution

    JF, performed the experiments, analyzed the results, designed the experimental plan and supervised the study and wrote the manuscript

    Contributed equally with

    Valerie Castellani

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

    "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8590-5615

17. Valerie Castellani

    University of Lyon, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, INMG UMR CNRS 5310, INSERM U1217, Lyon, France

    Contribution

    VC, designed the experimental plan, supervised the study and wrote the manuscript

    Contributed equally with

    Julien Falk

    For correspondence

    valerie.castellani@univ-lyon1.fr

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

    "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9623-9312

• 1,764

  views

• 289

  downloads

• 8

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.