The tumor microenvironment plays important roles in cancer, providing a niche for the preferential survival and proliferation of tumor cells. A major component of this structure is the glycosaminoglycan hyaluronan (HA). HA is composed of repeating disaccharides units of UDP-Glucuronic Acid and UDP-N-Acetyl Glucosamine. HA is synthesized by hyaluronic acid synthases (HAS), which are single transmembrane proteins localized to the inner-face of the plasma membrane (Kultti et al., 2006; Lenart et al., 2017). HA chain length can be associated with differential functions including regulation of various cellular processes such as embryonic development, tissue homeostasis, wound healing and inflammation and when dysregulated can promote EMT, tumor growth, and invasion (Goncharova et al., 2012; Toole, 2004). Shorter chains are primarily synthesized by HAS3 (Itano et al., 1999; Spicer and McDonald, 1998). These shorter forms of HA are often associated with malignant phenotypes (Slevin et al., 2007; Slevin et al., 2002; West et al., 1985). Artificial overexpression of HAS enzymes causes increased tumor growth in mouse xenograft models of prostate, breast and colon carcinomas while its knockdown reverses this phenotype (Kultti et al., 2006; Koistinen et al., 2015). Further, HA is cleaved by hyaluronidases which have been suggested to act as tumor suppressors; whereby increased expression inhibits tumor growth in colon and breast xenografts (Bertrand et al., 2005; Junker et al., 2003; Sá et al., 2015). Increased HA levels are correlated with formation of less dense matrices to facilitate invasion and promote angiogenesis. Elevated levels of HA in the stroma around tumors is associated with poor outcome (Anttila et al., 2000; Auvinen et al., 2000). In addition to surrounding tumors in some cases, HA can coat the surface of tumor cells with HA-based protrusions radiating from the cell surface (Ropponen et al., 1998; Setälä et al., 1999). Indeed, overexpression of HAS3 alone is sufficient to induce the formation of an HA coat with microvillus-like protrusions on the cell surface. The major HA receptor CD44 is found to co-localize with these surface HA coats but is not required for HA coat formation. The number of cancer cell types with cell-surface HA is not yet known, and the extent to which cell-associated HA also plays physiological roles in cancer is an important open question in the field.

Despite the wealth of knowledge relating HA to malignancy, there is virtually no information regarding how HA levels become elevated in cancer and further, there is no understanding of what physiological conditions drive production of cell-surface-associated HA. Indeed, the levels of mRNAs encoding the enzymes in the biosynthetic pathways are often poor predictors of HA production (Nykopp et al., 2010). For instance in endometrial and ovarian carcinomas, mRNA levels of HAS enzymes do not predict elevated HA levels in these specimens (Nykopp et al., 2010; Nykopp et al., 2009). These data suggest that this pathway is not always under direct transcriptional control and begs the question how else is HA production regulated. In this study, we demonstrate that the production of HA and its related downstream effectors are coordinately controlled post-transcriptionally by the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E. eIF4E is highly expressed in many cancers and this correlates with increased invasion, metastases and poor prognosis (Assouline et al., 2015; Culjkovic-Kraljacic and Borden, 2013; Gao et al., 2016; Pettersson et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2016). In early-stage clinical trials, eIF4E targeting with ribavirin led to objective responses including remissions in some acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients (Assouline et al., 2009; Assouline et al., 2015). In mouse models, eIF4E overexpression is sufficient to drive tumor formation (Kentsis et al., 2004; Lazaris-Karatzas et al., 1990; Lazaris-Karatzas and Sonenberg, 1992). At the biochemical level, eIF4E modulates expression of selected transcripts through its roles in nuclear mRNA export and translation. Both these functions contribute to its oncogenic potential (Culjkovic-Kraljacic and Borden, 2013; Carroll and Borden, 2013; Osborne and Borden, 2015). eIF4E-target transcripts are the downstream effectors of its physiological effects. Here, we identified the enzymes encoding the HA biosynthetic pathway, HAS3, CD44 and associated factors as eIF4E target transcripts. We demonstrated that this pathway was required for eIF4E to mediate its oncogenic activities.

We set out to identify mRNA target transcripts which could encode proteins that were downstream effectors of the oncogenic activities of eIF4E. To identify these mRNAs, we took advantage of a fundamental difference in the RNA-binding properties of eIF4E between cellular compartments. In the cytoplasm, eIF4E binds all capped-RNAs regardless of whether it increases their translation efficiency (Rousseau et al., 1996; Culjkovic-Kraljacic et al., 2016; Graff and Zimmer, 2003). However, in the nucleus, eIF4E binds transcripts that are functional export targets (Culjkovic et al., 2005; Culjkovic et al., 2006). These export target mRNAs typically contain a structurally-defined 50-nucleotide element known as an eIF4E sensitivity element (4ESE) in their 3’ UTR and are m⁷G capped (Culjkovic et al., 2006, 2007). This element is directly bound by the leucine-rich pentatricopeptide repeat (LRPPRC) protein which also directly binds the dorsal surface of eIF4E. The eIF4E-4ESE RNA-LRPPRC complex in turn binds the CRM1 nuclear pore receptor which transits it to the cytoplasm (Topisirovic et al., 2009; Volpon et al., 2016). To date, about 3500 RNAs have been shown to immunoprecipitate with eIF4E from the nuclear fraction of lymphoma cells suggesting that this is a broadly used mRNA export pathway (Culjkovic-Kraljacic et al., 2016). Given these considerations, we reasoned that identification of eIF4E-bound transcripts in the nucleus would provide a straightforward strategy for the discovery of downstream factors that execute its biological effects. These included enzymes involved in HA biosynthesis (see below).

We identified eIF4E-bound RNAs using an RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) strategy. Nuclear lysates from osteosarcoma U2Os cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-eIF4E antibodies, and results were compared to IgG controls (Figure 1b and Figure 1—figure supplement 1a,b). To ensure these interactions were functional, we also monitored the mRNA export of candidate transcripts as a function of eIF4E overexpression by monitoring RNA content in nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments. In both experiments, RNAs were detected by quantitative reverse transcription PCR methods (RT-qPCR). Fractionation quality was assessed using U6snRNA and tRNA^lys for nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions, respectively. Preliminary studies using genome-wide screens of our nuclear eIF4E RIPs provided evidence that factors involved in HA biosynthesis were targets (Figure 1a). Using RT-qPCR, we determined that the transcripts encoding most of these enzymes bound eIF4E in nuclear RIPs with enrichments ranging from 2.5 to 15 fold (Figure 1b). These target mRNAs include hyaluronan synthase 3 (HAS3; 2.6 fold), as well as many of the enzymes involved in generating the UDP-Glucuronic acid and UDP-N-Acetyl Glucosamine precursors including hexokinase 1 (HK, ~15 fold), and phosphoglucomutase (PGM5, ~11 fold), amongst others (Figure 1b). Comparison of eIF4E RIPs to input gave a similar pattern of results as to those compared to IgG controls (Figure 1—figure supplement 2a). We note that comparisons to input for abundant RNAs can lead to false negatives because even if fully bound to eIF4E, levels of nuclear eIF4E may not be sufficient to deplete the input pool. Further comparison to IgG allows an assessment of background binding to beads.

Figure 1 with 3 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Nuclear mRNA export assays indicated that these mRNA-eIF4E interactions were functional since we observed increased mRNA export two- to eight-fold upon eIF4E overexpression relative to vector controls depending on the transcript monitored (Figure 1c). The only transcript which was bound to eIF4E in the nucleus but was not an export target in these cells encoded glucose phosphoisomerase (GPI). However, many isoforms of GPI exist and thus future studies exploring specific isoforms may identify this as being actively exported. In addition to the HA biosynthetic machinery, other eIF4E targets identified in our RIP and fractionation studies included downstream effectors of HA for example CD44 as well as its signaling partners for example Ezrin and MMP9 (Figure 1b and c) (Montgomery et al., 2012). Total levels for target mRNAs were not affected by eIF4E overexpression confirming that these effects were post-transcriptional (Figure 1—figure supplement 1c). Negative control RNAs such as GADPH, Hsp90 and β-Tubulin were not in the immunoprecipitations and were not modulated at the export level (Figure 1b,c). For comparison, we used the S53A eIF4E mutant which is deficient in mRNA export and transformation but active in translation (Osborne and Borden, 2015; Culjkovic-Kraljacic et al., 2012). As expected, the S53A eIF4E mutant did not promote export of any of these mRNAs (Figure 1c). We also assessed whether the HA pathways transcripts were targets of eIF4E at the translation level using polysomal analysis in eIF4E-overepxressing or vector control U2Os cells and monitored mRNAs by RT-qPCR in each fraction. We did not observe substantial shifts for most of these mRNAs on the polysomes with modest shifts to heavier polysomes including CD44, UAP, UGDH and UGP2 (Figure 1—figure supplement 3a,b). c-Myc mRNA, an established translational target of eIF4E, showed a substantial polysomal shift (Figure 1—figure supplement 3a,b) (Culjkovic-Kraljacic et al., 2016). Our previous studies demonstrated that whether mRNAs were translation targets of eIF4E could be cell-type dependent (Culjkovic-Kraljacic et al., 2016), and thus, while most HA pathways transcripts do not appear to be substantially shifted on polysomes in U2Os cells, it is possible that the HA-pathway may be more translationally regulated by eIF4E in other cell types. In U2Os cells, the effects of eIF4E on the HA pathway appear to be more dependent on its mRNA export functions.

Consistent with our above findings, eIF4E overexpression led to increased protein levels of the relevant enzymes, including HAS3, HK, GFPT1, GNPNAT1, UAP1, UGDH, as well as downstream effectors of HA function such as CD44 and Ezrin, relative to vector controls (Figure 1d). Available antibodies for PGM5, UGP2 and GPI were not of sufficient quality to assess their respective protein levels. The positive controls Mcl1 and c-Myc were elevated in eIF4E overexpressing cells relative to vector controls, as expected (Figure 1d). Although the S53A eIF4E mutant did not export the corresponding transcripts, a modest increase relative to vector controls was observed at the protein levels for UAP1, c-Myc and Mcl-1 consistent with modest shifts in the polysomal profiles for these transcripts (Figure 1d and Figure 1—figure supplement 3) (Culjkovic-Kraljacic et al., 2016; Rousseau et al., 1996). Notably, the changes induced by S53A eIF4E were substantially less than those observed for wild-type eIF4E for all cases, consistent with the role of RNA export in their expression. Thus, eIF4E increases levels of the enzymes in the HA biosynthetic pathway and downstream effectors of HA signalling (e.g. CD44 and Ezrin) through increased mRNA export.

Next, we determined whether eIF4E overexpression drove production of HA. To address this, we monitored HA levels in eIF4E, eIF4E S53A and vector control U2OS cells using biotinylated HA-binding protein (HABP) with streptavidin-FITC and confocal microscopy. HA levels were substantially elevated in eIF4E overexpressing cells relative to vector controls or S53A eIF4E cells Figure 2a). Strikingly, HA was not extruded into the media, but rather coated the cell surface and formed short, filamentous protrusions radiating from the surface coat in the eIF4E overexpressing cells (Figure 2a,b). Enzymatic depletion of HA with Streptomyces hyaluronidase (HAse) virtually eliminated the HA signal indicating that the staining was specific and suggesting that the structures were HA-dependent (Figure 2a). Our findings are consistent with studies which used HAS3 overexpression to artificially induce HA production (1) where the protrusions were too narrow (120–130 nm) to be seen by light microscopy but were readily detectable using fluorescent HABP conjugates. We used fluorescence-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis (FACE) to independently validate elevated HA production (Figure 2c and Figure 1—figure supplement 1e). We observe a ~ threefold increase in HA levels in eIF4E-overexpressing cells relative to vector controls. HA levels in S53A-eIF4E cells were much lower than eIF4E overexpressing cells, and only modestly elevated relative to vector controls consistent with the mutant’s modest effects on the HA biosynthetic enzymes. Further, removal of extracellular glucose led to reduction of HA signalling consistent with the use of glucose as the major metabolic precursor in this pathway (Figure 1—figure supplement 1g–h). Thus, eIF4E overexpression induced HA production and was found associated with cells, coating the surface and forming protrusions. eIF4E required its mRNA export activity for HA production and this was likely augmented by its translation activity.

Figure 2

Download asset Open asset

We hypothesized that HA levels would be repressed by inhibition of eIF4E. eIF4E-overexpressing cells were treated with either RNAi to eIF4E or with a pharmacological inhibitor, ribavirin (Figure 2c,d). Ribavirin directly binds eIF4E and inhibits its mRNA export and translation functions (Pettersson et al., 2015; Kentsis et al., 2004; Volpon et al., 2013). We observed a reduction in HA to background levels via confocal microscopy using either ribavirin treatment or RNAi knockdown of eIF4E. Using FACE, we similarly observed a ~ ninefold reduction in HA levels for both eIF4E knockdown relative to control RNAi and ~2.5-fold for ribavirin treated versus untreated cells (Figure 2c and Figure 1—figure supplement 1f). Thus, eIF4E is necessary for HA production in these cells.

We extended our studies to assess whether eIF4E drives HA production in cellular contexts characterized by naturally occurring elevation of eIF4E for example acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and breast cancer (Assouline et al., 2015; Pettersson et al., 2015; Assouline et al., 2009; Pettersson et al., 2011). First, we examined the MM6 AML cell line which is characterized by elevated nuclear eIF4E levels, and thus with increased mRNA export activity for eIF4E targets (Figure 3a–e and Figure 3—figure supplement 1a–d). Using nuclear RIPs and mRNA export assays, we found that all mRNAs for the HA biosynthesis machinery including HAS3 and CD44 are eIF4E export targets in this cell type (Figure 3a–c). These targets included transcripts encoding GPI, which was not an export target in U2Os cells. This suggests that the ability to promote HA production in these cells might be even more potent and also that the cell context plays a role particularly in terms of isoform content of RNAs and protein compliment. We also note diversity in terms of the enzyme family members associated with eIF4E in MM6 cells versus eIF4E-overexpressing U2Os cells. For instance, transcripts encoding PGM5 which were eIF4E targets in U2Os cells, were not well expressed in MM6 cells. Instead, eIF4E bound to and exported PGM1 mRNAs. Importantly, these conservative substitutions in enzyme content still led to increased HA biosynthesis as observed by FACE and HABP staining (Figure 3d). Similar to U2Os cells, the surface of MM6 cells was characterized by HA coats. We also found in MM6 cells that eIF4E targeting with ribavirin reduced the mRNA export of the corresponding HA enzymes and CD44 from two- to ninefold depending on the mRNA monitored (Figure 3b). Ribavirin did not alter total mRNA levels consistent with this being a post-transcriptional effect (Figure 3—figure supplement 1c). Consistently, ribavirin treatment dramatically lowered protein levels for the representative members of the HA biosynthetic machinery examined: HAS3, HK, UGDH as well as CD44 (Figure 3c). HA staining was reduced to background levels by ribavirin or HAse treatment as observed by HABP staining and confocal microscopy (Figure 3d). We paralleled these studies in primary high-eIF4E AML specimens and also in CD34+ bone marrow specimens isolated from healthy volunteers (Figure 3e–f). Consistent with the MM6 cells, 9/9 high-eIF4E AML specimens had HA coats and protrusions with HA staining 4–10 fold higher than the five normal human CD34+ specimens which all showed low-level, presumbably background, HA staining similar to intensities observed in vector controls U2Os cells (Figure 2a). These findings suggest that the HA coat is specific to the malignant state and not a general feature of blood cells (Figure 3e–f). These findings point to new functionalities for HA in leukemia cells, where it was previously thought HA only played a role in the bone marrow stroma and not on the leukemia cells themselves.

Figure 3 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Next, we examined another high-eIF4E context, the breast cancer cell line 66cl4. These cells had highly elevated nuclear eIF4E, and also had readily visible HA-surface coats and protrusions as observed by confocal microscopy (Figure 3g). Ribavirin treatment reduced HAS3 and CD44 levels relative to untreated controls as well as dramatically reduced HA levels (Figure 3g). Furthermore, we observed by in situ translation studies using fluorescence non-canonical amino-acid tagging (FUNCAT), that there could be active translation down the length of the protrusions in eIF4E-overexpressing and 66cl4 cells (Figure 3—figure supplement 2a–b). These translation foci are cyclohexamide dependent validating them as sites of ongoing translation (Figure 3—figure supplement 2a–b). We postulate that eIF4E could be involved in localized protein synthesis to spatially couple translation of relevant HA enzymes with HA biosynthesis. In this way, increased rates of translation may not be required, but localization of translation could facilitate HA synthesis as well as mRNA export. In all, our studies demonstrate that eIF4E controls HA biosynthesis at both the mRNA export and translation level thereby coordinately driving HA production.

eIF4E plays well-established roles in invasion, migration and metastasis. We hypothesized that eIF4E co-opted HA synthesis to execute these activities. Starting with invasion, we observed that eIF4E-overexpressing cells invaded matrigel fourfold better than vector controls (Figure 4a,b and Figure 4—figure supplement 1a–b and e–f). By contrast, the S53A eIF4E mutant increased invasion by only 50% relative to vector controls consistent with its more modest effects on HA production by FACE (Figure 2c; Figure 4—figure supplement 1e–f and Figure 1—figure supplement 1e). In both eIF4E overexpressing and vector control cells, RNAi to eIF4E or ribavirin treatment reduced invasion by ~2.5-fold consistent with the significant reduction in HA levels (Figure 2c, Figure 4e–f and Figure 4—figure supplement 1e–f). To determine the relevance of HA production specifically to eIF4E mediated invasion, we used RNAi to knockdown HAS3 in eIF4E overexpressing and vector cells (Figure 4a and Figure 4—figure supplement 1a–b). We focused on HAS3 since this is the last step in the biosynthetic pathway of HA and its inhibition specifically impairs HA synthesis, whereas other enzymes in this pathway also participate in unrelated processes. We observed that RNAi to HAS3 reduced the invasion activity of eIF4E by ~ fivefold in eIF4E overexpressing cells (to levels of RNAi controls) and 2.5-fold in vector controls where the effects of endogenous eIF4E are likely being targeted. HAS3 knockdown did not affect eIF4E levels as observed by western blot (Figure 4d). Furthermore, confocal microscopy experiments revealed that RNAi to HAS3 decreased HA levels to background consistent with its baseline invasion activity (Figure 4c). FACE studies also revealed that HAS3 knockdown lowered HA levels by ~ ninefold relative to RNAi controls (Figure 2c and Figure 1—figure supplement 1f). Strikingly, eIF4E knockdown and HAS3 knockdown similarly reduced HA to background levels.

Figure 4 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

We explored the efficacy of HAse treatment for the invasion activity of eIF4E (Figure 4e and f). Given the length of time between HAse treatment and re-emergence of HA in eIF4E-overexpressing cells was 12 hr (Figure 4—figure supplement 1h), we treated cells with HAse every 8 hr to ensure HA was depleted during the course of the experiments. We observed that HAse treatment reduced invasion by 40% relative to untreated controls. For comparison, ribavirin decreased invasion by 60% consistent with its reduction of HA to background levels. Strikingly, the combination of ribavirin and HAse reduced invasion by 80% (Figure 4e–f and Figure 4—figure supplement 1c–d). Importantly, ribavirin affects multiple eIF4E target pathways, not only HA biosynthesis, and thus its effects are expected to be greater than HAse alone. We extended these studies to monitor the role HA production played in the migration activity of eIF4E in wound healing assays. As expected, we observed increased migration in eIF4E-overexpressing cells relative to vector controls (Figure 4g,h). Knockdown of HAS3 reduced eIF4E-dependent migration by ~ fourfold while treatment with HAse reduced it by almost twofold indicating this was also an HA dependent phenomenon.

We extended the above studies to examine the role of HA in eIF4E-mediated metastasis in vivo. Previously, we demonstrated that ribavirin treatment reduced metastasis by 3-fold in an eIF4E-dependent pulmonary metastatic mouse model using 66cl4 cells (Pettersson et al., 2015). In this previous study, 66cl4 cells were injected into the mammary fat pad of syngeneic Balb/c mice. On day 11 post injection, mice with palpable tumors were randomized into two groups and treated orally with water or 3 mg ribavirin/mouse/day (5d/week, to reach, clinically achievable, plasma concentration of 23 µM). On day 27, all mice were sacrificed and tumors and lungs were preserved. Metastatic lung burden was calculated as the percentage of tumor/total lung areas for each mouse on 5 × 50 μm serial step sections by manually circling the metastasis (Visiomorph Software). Above, we demonstrated that eIF4E drives HA production in these cells and that ribavirin repressed HAS3 and HA production (Figure 3). Here, we investigated these tissue sections to ascertain whether inhibition of eIF4E activity correlated not only with reduced lung metastases (Pettersson et al., 2015) but also with lower HA levels (Figure 5). Serial formalin-fixed sections of tumor bearing lungs, from control and ribavirin-treated animals, were stained for HA, and hematoxylin (Figure 5a). Staining intensity and area were quantified using Visiomorph. Tumors from 10 animals for treated and nine in the untreated groups were analyzed. Strikingly, we observed a 50% decrease in HA levels in the lungs of ribavirin-treated mice relative to controls (Figure 5a–b). HA surrounded tumor cells indicating that HA was adjacent to and/or on the surface of these cells. As expected, HA was also found in normal tissues, consistent with its major structural role in the microenvironment. HAse treatment of serial sections indicated that the HA staining observed is specific (Figure 5a). Thus, we demonstrate that eIF4E targeting leads to reduced HA levels and decreased metastasis in vivo.

Figure 5

Download asset Open asset

Next, we examined whether CD44, as a representative downstream effector of the HA-network, was also required for eIF4E-mediated invasion (Figure 1b–d). eIF4E overexpression led to highly elevated CD44 protein levels (Figure 1d) and CD44 coated the surface (Figure 4—figure supplement 2a). Indeed, CD44 and HA co-localized on the cell surface (Figure 4—figure supplement 2a and e). These studies are similar to those showing that CD44 bound HA on the surface of HAS3 overexpressing cells (Kultti et al., 2006). Inhibition of CD44 with RNAi or independently with CD44-blocking antibodies (mAb A3D8) reduced eIF4E-mediated invasion by ~ fourfold for RNAi and ~ threefold for mAb A3D8 treatment (Figure 4—figure supplement 2b–c and f–g). The similarity for the reduction induced by CD44 inhibition, knockdown of HAS3 or ribavirin treatment suggests that CD44 plays an important role in this process. Significantly, modulation of CD44 did not alter HA status, as seen by HABP-staining via confocal microscopy (Figure 4—figure supplement 2e). Thus, although HA is essential for eIF4E-mediated invasion, its co-factors CD44 and perhaps others, are likely also required for this activity. This suggests that the HA coat and/or protrusions need to be armed with CD44 to support the invasion potential of eIF4E overexpressing cells. Further in high-eIF4E cells, HA is likely directly binding CD44 to activate this signaling pathways in neighboring cells and/or in its own cells leading to autocrine stimulation. In either case, these would stimulate cellular signaling cascades that drive the oncogenic phenotype.

1. 1. Anttila MA
   2. Tammi RH
   3. Tammi MI
   4. Syrjänen KJ
   5. Saarikoski SV
   6. Kosma VM

   (2000)

   High levels of stromal hyaluronan predict poor disease outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer

   Cancer Research 60:150–155.

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Assouline S
   2. Culjkovic B
   3. Cocolakis E
   4. Rousseau C
   5. Beslu N
   6. Amri A
   7. Caplan S
   8. Leber B
   9. Roy DC
   10. Miller WH
   11. Borden KL

   (2009) Molecular targeting of the oncogene eIF4E in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a proof-of-principle clinical trial with ribavirin

   Blood 114:257–260.

   https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-02-205153

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Assouline S
   2. Culjkovic-Kraljacic B
   3. Bergeron J
   4. Caplan S
   5. Cocolakis E
   6. Lambert C
   7. Lau CJ
   8. Zahreddine HA
   9. Miller WH
   10. Borden KL

   (2015) A phase I trial of ribavirin and low-dose cytarabine for the treatment of relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia with elevated eIF4E

   Haematologica 100:e7–e9.

   https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2014.111245

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Auvinen P
   2. Tammi R
   3. Parkkinen J
   4. Tammi M
   5. Agren U
   6. Johansson R
   7. Hirvikoski P
   8. Eskelinen M
   9. Kosma VM

   (2000) Hyaluronan in peritumoral stroma and malignant cells associates with breast cancer spreading and predicts survival

   The American Journal of Pathology 156:529–536.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64757-8

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Bertrand P
   2. Courel MN
   3. Maingonnat C
   4. Jardin F
   5. Tilly H
   6. Bastard C

   (2005) Expression of HYAL2 mRNA, hyaluronan and hyaluronidase in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: relationship with tumor aggressiveness

   International Journal of Cancer 113:207–212.

   https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.20562

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Carroll M
   2. Borden KL

   (2013) The oncogene eIF4E: using biochemical insights to target cancer

   Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research 33:227–238.

   https://doi.org/10.1089/jir.2012.0142

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Culjkovic B
   2. Tan K
   3. Orolicki S
   4. Amri A
   5. Meloche S
   6. Borden KL

   (2008) The eIF4E RNA regulon promotes the Akt signaling pathway

   The Journal of Cell Biology 181:51–63.

   https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200707018

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Culjkovic B
   2. Topisirovic I
   3. Borden KL

   (2007) Controlling gene expression through RNA regulons: the role of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E

   Cell Cycle 6:65–69.

   https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.6.1.3688

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Culjkovic B
   2. Topisirovic I
   3. Skrabanek L
   4. Ruiz-Gutierrez M
   5. Borden KL

   (2005) eIF4E promotes nuclear export of cyclin D1 mRNAs via an element in the 3'UTR

   The Journal of Cell Biology 169:245–256.

   https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200501019

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Culjkovic B
    2. Topisirovic I
    3. Skrabanek L
    4. Ruiz-Gutierrez M
    5. Borden KL

    (2006) eIF4E is a central node of an RNA regulon that governs cellular proliferation

    The Journal of Cell Biology 175:415–426.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200607020

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Culjkovic-Kraljacic B
    2. Baguet A
    3. Volpon L
    4. Amri A
    5. Borden KL

    (2012) The oncogene eIF4E reprograms the nuclear pore complex to promote mRNA export and oncogenic transformation

    Cell Reports 2:207–215.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2012.07.007

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Culjkovic-Kraljacic B
    2. Borden KL

    (2013) Aiding and abetting cancer: mRNA export and the nuclear pore

    Trends in Cell Biology 23:328–335.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2013.03.004

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Culjkovic-Kraljacic B
    2. Fernando TM
    3. Marullo R
    4. Calvo-Vidal N
    5. Verma A
    6. Yang S
    7. Tabbò F
    8. Gaudiano M
    9. Zahreddine H
    10. Goldstein RL
    11. Patel J
    12. Taldone T
    13. Chiosis G
    14. Ladetto M
    15. Ghione P
    16. Machiorlatti R
    17. Elemento O
    18. Inghirami G
    19. Melnick A
    20. Borden KL
    21. Cerchietti L

    (2016) Combinatorial targeting of nuclear export and translation of RNA inhibits aggressive B-cell lymphomas

    Blood 127:858–868.

    https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-05-645069

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Gao M
    2. Zhang X
    3. Li D
    4. He P
    5. Tian W
    6. Zeng B

    (2016) Expression analysis and clinical significance of eIF4E, VEGF-C, E-cadherin and MMP-2 in colorectal adenocarcinoma

    Oncotarget 7:85502–85514.

    https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13453

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Goncharova V
    2. Serobyan N
    3. Iizuka S
    4. Schraufstatter I
    5. de Ridder A
    6. Povaliy T
    7. Wacker V
    8. Itano N
    9. Kimata K
    10. Orlovskaja IA
    11. Yamaguchi Y
    12. Khaldoyanidi S

    (2012) Hyaluronan expressed by the hematopoietic microenvironment is required for bone marrow hematopoiesis

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 287:25419–25433.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.376699

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Graff JR
    2. Zimmer SG

    (2003) Translational control and metastatic progression: enhanced activity of the mRNA cap-binding protein eIF-4E selectively enhances translation of metastasis-related mRNAs

    Clinical and Experimental Metastasis 20:265–273.

    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022943419011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Itano N
    2. Sawai T
    3. Yoshida M
    4. Lenas P
    5. Yamada Y
    6. Imagawa M
    7. Shinomura T
    8. Hamaguchi M
    9. Yoshida Y
    10. Ohnuki Y
    11. Miyauchi S
    12. Spicer AP
    13. McDonald JA
    14. Kimata K

    (1999) Three isoforms of mammalian hyaluronan synthases have distinct enzymatic properties

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 274:25085–25092.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.35.25085

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Junker N
    2. Latini S
    3. Petersen LN
    4. Kristjansen PE

    (2003)

    Expression and regulation patterns of hyaluronidases in small cell lung cancer and glioma lines

    Oncology Reports 10:609–616.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Kentsis A
    2. Topisirovic I
    3. Culjkovic B
    4. Shao L
    5. Borden KL

    (2004) Ribavirin suppresses eIF4E-mediated oncogenic transformation by physical mimicry of the 7-methyl guanosine mRNA cap

    PNAS 101:18105–18110.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406927102

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Koistinen V
    2. Kärnä R
    3. Koistinen A
    4. Arjonen A
    5. Tammi M
    6. Rilla K

    (2015) Cell protrusions induced by hyaluronan synthase 3 (HAS3) resemble mesothelial microvilli and share cytoskeletal features of filopodia

    Experimental Cell Research 337:179–191.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.06.016

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Kultti A
    2. Rilla K
    3. Tiihonen R
    4. Spicer AP
    5. Tammi RH
    6. Tammi MI

    (2006) Hyaluronan synthesis induces microvillus-like cell surface protrusions

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 281:15821–15828.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M512840200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Lazaris-Karatzas A
    2. Montine KS
    3. Sonenberg N

    (1990) Malignant transformation by a eukaryotic initiation factor subunit that binds to mRNA 5' cap

    Nature 345:544–547.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/345544a0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Lazaris-Karatzas A
    2. Sonenberg N

    (1992) The mRNA 5' cap-binding protein, eIF-4E, cooperates with v-myc or E1A in the transformation of primary rodent fibroblasts

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 12:1234–1238.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.12.3.1234

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Lenart M
    2. Rutkowska-Zapala M
    3. Baj-Krzyworzeka M
    4. Szatanek R
    5. Węglarczyk K
    6. Smallie T
    7. Ziegler-Heitbrock L
    8. Zembala M
    9. Siedlar M

    (2017) Hyaluronan carried by tumor-derived microvesicles induces IL-10 production in classical (CD14(++)CD16(-)) monocytes via PI3K/Akt/mTOR-dependent signalling pathway

    Immunobiology 222:1–10.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imbio.2015.06.019

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Montgomery N
    2. Hill A
    3. McFarlane S
    4. Neisen J
    5. O'Grady A
    6. Conlon S
    7. Jirstrom K
    8. Kay EW
    9. Waugh DJ

    (2012) CD44 enhances invasion of basal-like breast cancer cells by upregulating serine protease and collagen-degrading enzymatic expression and activity

    Breast Cancer Research 14:R84.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3199

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Nykopp TK
    2. Rilla K
    3. Sironen R
    4. Tammi MI
    5. Tammi RH
    6. Hämäläinen K
    7. Heikkinen AM
    8. Komulainen M
    9. Kosma VM
    10. Anttila M

    (2009) Expression of hyaluronan synthases (HAS1-3) and hyaluronidases (HYAL1-2) in serous ovarian carcinomas: inverse correlation between HYAL1 and hyaluronan content

    BMC Cancer 9:143.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-143

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Nykopp TK
    2. Rilla K
    3. Tammi MI
    4. Tammi RH
    5. Sironen R
    6. Hämäläinen K
    7. Kosma VM
    8. Heinonen S
    9. Anttila M

    (2010) Hyaluronan synthases (HAS1-3) and hyaluronidases (HYAL1-2) in the accumulation of hyaluronan in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma

    BMC Cancer 10:512.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-512

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Osborne MJ
    2. Borden KL

    (2015) The eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E in the nucleus: taking the road less traveled

    Immunological Reviews 263:210–223.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12240

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Partridge J
    2. Flaherty P

    (2009) An in vitro FluoroBlok tumor invasion assay

    Journal of Visualized Experiments : JoVE 20:1475.

    https://doi.org/10.3791/1475

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Pettersson F
    2. Del Rincon SV
    3. Emond A
    4. Huor B
    5. Ngan E
    6. Ng J
    7. Dobocan MC
    8. Siegel PM
    9. Miller WH

    (2015) Genetic and pharmacologic inhibition of eIF4E reduces breast cancer cell migration, invasion, and metastasis

    Cancer Research 75:1102–1112.

    https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1996

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Pettersson F
    2. Yau C
    3. Dobocan MC
    4. Culjkovic-Kraljacic B
    5. Retrouvey H
    6. Retrouvay H
    7. Puckett R
    8. Flores LM
    9. Krop IE
    10. Rousseau C
    11. Cocolakis E
    12. Borden KL
    13. Benz CC
    14. Miller WH

    (2011) Ribavirin treatment effects on breast cancers overexpressing eIF4E, a biomarker with prognostic specificity for luminal B-type breast cancer

    Clinical Cancer Research 17:2874–2884.

    https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2334

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Ropponen K
    2. Tammi M
    3. Parkkinen J
    4. Eskelinen M
    5. Tammi R
    6. Lipponen P
    7. Agren U
    8. Alhava E
    9. Kosma VM

    (1998)

    Tumor cell-associated hyaluronan as an unfavorable prognostic factor in colorectal cancer

    Cancer Research 58:342–347.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Rousseau D
    2. Kaspar R
    3. Rosenwald I
    4. Gehrke L
    5. Sonenberg N

    (1996) Translation initiation of ornithine decarboxylase and nucleocytoplasmic transport of cyclin D1 mRNA are increased in cells overexpressing eukaryotic initiation factor 4E

    PNAS 93:1065–1070.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.3.1065

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Sá VK
    2. Rocha TP
    3. Moreira A
    4. Soares FA
    5. Takagaki T
    6. Carvalho L
    7. Nicholson AG
    8. Capelozzi VL

    (2015) Hyaluronidases and hyaluronan synthases expression is inversely correlated with malignancy in lung/bronchial pre-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions, affecting prognosis

    Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research = Revista Brasileira De Pesquisas Medicas E Biologicas 48:1039–1047.

    https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20154693

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Setälä LP
    2. Tammi MI
    3. Tammi RH
    4. Eskelinen MJ
    5. Lipponen PK
    6. Agren UM
    7. Parkkinen J
    8. Alhava EM
    9. Kosma VM

    (1999) Hyaluronan expression in gastric cancer cells is associated with local and nodal spread and reduced survival rate

    British Journal of Cancer 79:1133–1138.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690180

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Slevin M
    2. Krupinski J
    3. Gaffney J
    4. Matou S
    5. West D
    6. Delisser H
    7. Savani RC
    8. Kumar S

    (2007) Hyaluronan-mediated angiogenesis in vascular disease: uncovering RHAMM and CD44 receptor signaling pathways

    Matrix Biology 26:58–68.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2006.08.261

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Slevin M
    2. Kumar S
    3. Gaffney J

    (2002) Angiogenic oligosaccharides of hyaluronan induce multiple signaling pathways affecting vascular endothelial cell mitogenic and wound healing responses

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 277:41046–41059.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109443200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Spicer AP
    2. McDonald JA

    (1998) Characterization and molecular evolution of a vertebrate hyaluronan synthase gene family

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 273:1923–1932.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.4.1923

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Tcherkezian J
    2. Cargnello M
    3. Romeo Y
    4. Huttlin EL
    5. Lavoie G
    6. Gygi SP
    7. Roux PP

    (2014) Proteomic analysis of cap-dependent translation identifies LARP1 as a key regulator of 5'TOP mRNA translation

    Genes & Development 28:357–371.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.231407.113

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Toole BP

    (2004) Hyaluronan: from extracellular glue to pericellular cue

    Nature Reviews Cancer 4:528–539.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1391

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Topisirovic I
    2. Culjkovic B
    3. Cohen N
    4. Perez JM
    5. Skrabanek L
    6. Borden KL

    (2003b) The proline-rich homeodomain protein, PRH, is a tissue-specific inhibitor of eIF4E-dependent cyclin D1 mRNA transport and growth

    The EMBO Journal 22:689–703.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg069

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Topisirovic I
    2. Guzman ML
    3. McConnell MJ
    4. Licht JD
    5. Culjkovic B
    6. Neering SJ
    7. Jordan CT
    8. Borden KL

    (2003a) Aberrant eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-dependent mRNA transport impedes hematopoietic differentiation and contributes to leukemogenesis

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 23:8992–9002.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.23.24.8992-9002.2003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Topisirovic I
    2. Siddiqui N
    3. Lapointe VL
    4. Trost M
    5. Thibault P
    6. Bangeranye C
    7. Piñol-Roma S
    8. Borden KL

    (2009) Molecular dissection of the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) export-competent RNP

    The EMBO Journal 28:1087–1098.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.53

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Volpon L
    2. Culjkovic-Kraljacic B
    3. Osborne MJ
    4. Ramteke A
    5. Sun Q
    6. Niesman A
    7. Chook YM
    8. Borden KL

    (2016) Importin 8 mediates m7G cap-sensitive nuclear import of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E

    PNAS 113:5263–5268.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1524291113

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Volpon L
    2. Culjkovic-Kraljacic B
    3. Sohn HS
    4. Blanchet-Cohen A
    5. Osborne MJ
    6. Borden KLB

    (2017) A biochemical framework for eIF4E-dependent mRNA export and nuclear recycling of the export machinery

    RNA 23:927–937.

    https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.060137.116

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Volpon L
    2. Osborne MJ
    3. Zahreddine H
    4. Romeo AA
    5. Borden KL

    (2013) Conformational changes induced in the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E by a clinically relevant inhibitor, ribavirin triphosphate

    Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 434:614–619.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.03.125

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. West DC
    2. Hampson IN
    3. Arnold F
    4. Kumar S

    (1985) Angiogenesis induced by degradation products of hyaluronic acid

    Science 228:1324–1326.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2408340

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Xu T
    2. Zong Y
    3. Peng L
    4. Kong S
    5. Zhou M
    6. Zou J
    7. Liu J
    8. Miao R
    9. Sun X
    10. Li L

    (2016) Overexpression of eIF4E in colorectal cancer patients is associated with liver metastasis

    OncoTargets and Therapy 9:815–822.

    https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S98330

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Hiba Ahmad Zahreddine

   Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing, Designed and performed experiments, Analysed data

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8905-1661

2. Biljana Culjkovic-Kraljacic

   Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Resources, Formal analysis, Supervision, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Project administration, Writing—review and editing, Designed and performed experiments, Analysed data

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Audrey Emond

   Segal Cancer Centre, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Québec, Canada

   Contribution

   Resources, Methodology, Performed experiments, Revised manuscript

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Filippa Pettersson

   Segal Cancer Centre, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Québec, Canada

   Contribution

   Resources, Methodology, Performed experiments

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Ronald Midura

   1. Orthopaedic Research Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United States
   2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United States

   Contribution

   Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing—review and editing, Designed experiments, Analysed data

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

6. Mark Lauer

   1. Orthopaedic Research Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United States
   2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United States

   Contribution

   Resources, Validation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing—review and editing, Performed experiments

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

7. Sonia Del Rincon

   Segal Cancer Centre, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Québec, Canada

   Contribution

   Resources, Methodology, Writing—review and editing, Performed experiments

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

8. Valbona Cali

   1. Orthopaedic Research Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United States
   2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United States

   Contribution

   Resources, Supervision, Methodology, Performed experiments

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

9. Sarit Assouline

   Segal Cancer Centre, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Québec, Canada

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Resources, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Edited manuscript

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

10. Wilson H Miller

    Segal Cancer Centre, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Québec, Canada

    Contribution

    Resources, Methodology, Writing—review and editing, Analyzed data

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared

11. Vincent Hascall

    1. Orthopaedic Research Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United States
    2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United States

    Contribution

    Resources, Supervision, Writing—review and editing, Designed experiments, Analysed data

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared

12. Katherine LB Borden

    Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada

    Contribution

    Conceptualization, Resources, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Project administration, Writing—review and editing, Designed experiments, Analysed data

    For correspondence

    katherine.borden@umontreal.ca

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared

    "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2188-5074

• 2,208

  views

• 293

  downloads

• 16

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.