1. Neuroscience
Download icon

Integrative and distinctive coding of visual and conceptual object features in the ventral visual stream

  1. Chris B Martin Is a corresponding author
  2. Danielle Douglas
  3. Rachel N Newsome
  4. Louisa LY Man
  5. Morgan Barense Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Toronto, Canada
  2. Mount Allison University, Canada
  3. Rotman Research Institute, Canada
  4. Queen's University, Canada
Research Article
  • Cited 0
  • Views 800
  • Annotations
Cite as: eLife 2018;7:e31873 doi: 10.7554/eLife.31873

Abstract

A significant body of research in cognitive neuroscience is aimed at understanding how object concepts are represented in the human brain. However, it remains unknown whether and where the visual and abstract conceptual features that define an object concept are integrated. We addressed this issue by comparing the neural pattern similarities among object-evoked fMRI responses with behavior-based models that independently captured the visual and conceptual similarities among these stimuli. Our results revealed evidence for distinctive coding of visual features in lateral occipital cortex, and conceptual features in the temporal pole and parahippocampal cortex. By contrast, we found evidence for integrative coding of visual and conceptual object features in perirhinal cortex. The neuroanatomical specificity of this effect was highlighted by results from a searchlight analysis. Taken together, our findings suggest that perirhinal cortex uniquely supports the representation of fully-specified object concepts through the integration of their visual and conceptual features.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Chris B Martin

    Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    For correspondence
    cmarti97@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon 0000-0002-7014-4371
  2. Danielle Douglas

    Department of Psychology, Mount Allison University, Sackville, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Rachel N Newsome

    Rotman Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Louisa LY Man

    Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Morgan Barense

    Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    For correspondence
    barense@psych.utoronto.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

  • Morgan Barense

James S. McDonnell Foundation

  • Morgan Barense

Canada Research Chairs

  • Morgan Barense

Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation

  • Morgan Barense

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (PDF - 502437 - 2017)

  • Chris B Martin

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University ofToronto (REB # 23778) and the Research Ethics Board at Baycrest Hospital (REB # 15-06). Informed consent was obtained from each participant before the experiment, including consent to publish anonymized results.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Nicole Rust, Reviewing Editor, University of Pennsylvania, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: September 10, 2017
  2. Accepted: February 1, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 2, 2018 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2018, Martin et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 800
    Page views
  • 170
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading