1. Biophysics and Structural Biology
  2. Genes and Chromosomes
Download icon

Decoding the centromeric nucleosome through CENP-N

  1. Satyakrishna Pentakota
  2. Keda Zhou
  3. Charlotte Smith
  4. Stefano Maffini
  5. Arsen Petrovic
  6. Garry P Morgan
  7. John R Weir
  8. Ingrid R Vetter
  9. Andrea Musacchio Is a corresponding author
  10. Karolin Luger Is a corresponding author
  1. Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Germany
  2. University of Colorado, Boulder, United States
Research Article
Cited
0
Views
895
Comments
0
Cite as: eLife 2017;6:e33442 doi: 10.7554/eLife.33442

Abstract

Centromere protein (CENP) A, a histone H3 variant, is a key epigenetic determinant of chromosome domains known as centromeres. Centromeres nucleate kinetochores, multi-subunit complexes that capture spindle microtubules to promote chromosome segregation during mitosis. Two kinetochore proteins, CENP-C and CENP-N, recognize CENP-A in the context of a rare CENP-A nucleosome. Here, we reveal the structural basis for the exquisite selectivity of CENP-N for centromeres. CENP-N uses charge and space complementarity to decode the L1 loop that is unique to CENP-A. It also engages in extensive interactions with a 15-base pair segment of the distorted nucleosomal DNA double helix, in a position predicted to exclude chromatin remodelling enzymes. Besides CENP-A, stable centromere recruitment of CENP-N requires a coincident interaction with a newly identified binding motif on nucleosome-bound CENP-C. Collectively, our studies clarify how CENP-N and CENP-C decode and stabilize the non-canonical CENP-A nucleosome to enforce epigenetic centromere specification and kinetochore assembly.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Satyakrishna Pentakota

    Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Keda Zhou

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Charlotte Smith

    Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Stefano Maffini

    Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Arsen Petrovic

    Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Garry P Morgan

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. John R Weir

    Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Ingrid R Vetter

    Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Andrea Musacchio

    Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany
    For correspondence
    andrea.musacchio@mpi-dortmund.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    Andrea Musacchio, Senior Editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon 0000-0003-2362-8784
  10. Karolin Luger

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, United States
    For correspondence
    karolin.luger@colorado.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon 0000-0001-5136-5331

Funding

H2020 European Research Council (AdG 669686)

  • Andrea Musacchio

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC1093)

  • Andrea Musacchio

National Institutes of Health (GM067777)

  • Karolin Luger

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Karolin Luger

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (Open-access funding)

  • Andrea Musacchio

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Geeta J Narlikar, Reviewing Editor, University of California, San Francisco, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: November 8, 2017
  2. Accepted: December 23, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 27, 2017 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2017, Pentakota et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 895
    Page views
  • 302
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: PubMed Central, Scopus, Crossref.

Comments

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading