Iron is an essential nutrient required by nearly all organisms for biological processes including DNA replication, mitochondrial respiration, and oxygen transport (Anderson et al., 2012). As a redox active element, iron also has a role in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can be deleterious to cellular proteins, DNA and membranes. In humans, tight regulation of cellular iron content is essential, as iron deficiency impairs neurological development in infants and causes anemia in adults, while iron overload leads to cardiomyopathy, diabetes mellitus, and neurodegenerative diseases (Fleming and Ponka, 2012). Excess iron also predisposes humans to infectious diseases, and limiting iron availability to microbes is a critical host innate immune response (Lopez and Skaar, 2018; Weiss and Carver, 2018). Given the dual nature of iron in healthy and diseased states, it is critical for organisms to maintain cellular iron concentration in a narrow physiological range.

C. elegans has emerged as a useful model for studying iron metabolism. In addition to its genetic tractability, ease of maintenance and susceptibility to human pathogens, key proteins involved in mammalian iron uptake, storage and efflux are conserved in C. elegans (Anderson and Leibold, 2014). C. elegans express the divalent metal transporter SMF-3 (Au et al., 2009; Bandyopadhyay et al., 2009; Romney et al., 2011), the iron-storage protein ferritin (FTN-1, FTN-2) (Gourley et al., 2003; Kim et al., 2004; Romney et al., 2008; Valentini et al., 2012) and the iron export protein ferroportin (FPN-1.1–3), which are orthologous to human DMT1 (SLC11A2, NRAMP2), ferritin-H and -L subunits (FTH1, FTL) and ferroportin (SLC40A1), respectively. Iron is transported across the apical enterocyte membrane by SMF-3/DMT1 and is used within the enterocyte for the metalation of iron-containing proteins and by mitochondria for Fe-S cluster biosynthesis (Braymer and Lill, 2017; Rouault, 2015). Iron not utilized is stored in ferritin within the enterocyte or exported across the basolateral enterocyte membrane by ferroportin/FPN-1.1. Ferroportin is the sole iron exporter in mammals (Ward and Kaplan, 2012), unlike C. elegans that express three ferroportin orthologs (FPN-1.1–3) that are not well characterized. Like mammals, intestinal iron absorption in C. elegans is upregulated during iron deficiency by HIF-transcriptional activation of smf-3/DMT1 (C. elegans, HIF-1; human, HIF-2α, EPAS1) (Mastrogiannaki et al., 2009; Romney et al., 2008; Shah et al., 2009). One difference between iron sequestration in C. elegans and vertebrates is that during iron limitation C. elegans ferritin is transcriptionally repressed by HIF-1 (Ackerman and Gems, 2012; Romney et al., 2011), while vertebrate ferritin is translationally repressed by the iron-regulatory proteins (IRPs) (Anderson et al., 2012). In addition to iron, ftn-1 is regulated by the insulin/IGF-like (IIS) pathway (Ackerman and Gems, 2012), the REF-1 transcription factor HLH-29 (Quach et al., 2013), and by the serum/glucocorticoid-regulated kinase (SGK-1) to regulate lipid and iron homeostasis (Wang et al., 2016). The regulation of iron uptake by SMF-3 and iron sequestration by ferritin ensures that cells acquire adequate iron to satisfy their needs while limiting iron toxicity. Precise maintenance of cellular iron homeostasis is underscored by the shortened life span of C. elegans exposed to high iron (Gourley et al., 2003; Valentini et al., 2012).

Iron is required in the establishment of most pathogen infections. Pathogens use a variety of mechanisms to acquire iron from the host, one of which is the synthesis and release of siderophores that bind iron, allowing its uptake by bacteria (Palmer and Skaar, 2016). In response to pathogens, hosts have evolved strategies to limit iron availability that include the production of metal sequestering proteins, the sequestration of iron in ferritin and the regulation of metal transporter function (Lopez and Skaar, 2018; Wessling-Resnick, 2015). C. elegans has provided a valuable genetic model to study host-pathogen interactions because many human pathogens, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enterica and Staphylococcus aureus, cause lethal intestinal infections in C. elegans (Cohen and Troemel, 2015). Although C. elegans lack an adaptive immune system, these organisms rely on evolutionarily conserved innate immune systems, such as the p38-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), insulin and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling pathways, for sensing and resolving bacterial infections (Irazoqui et al., 2010; Kim and Ewbank, 2015). Similar to vertebrates, C. elegans use diverse mechanisms to withhold iron and other metals during pathogen infections. FTN-2 provide resistance to S. aureus and E. coli LF82 infections (Simonsen et al., 2011) and SMF-3 provides resistance to S. aureus infections (Bandyopadhyay et al., 2009). In addition, C. elegans respond to pyoverdine, an iron siderophore produced by P. aeruginosa, by upregulation of a mitochondrial surveillance pathway that is triggered by pyoverdine-induced mitochondrial damage (Kang et al., 2018; Kirienko et al., 2015; Tjahjono and Kirienko, 2017). These studies highlight iron limitation as an important component of innate immune response in controlling pathogen infections.

In this report, we identify NHR-14, a nuclear receptor (NR) as a transcriptional repressor of SMF-3-dependent iron uptake and the innate immune response. Loss of nhr-14 promotes the nuclear localization of PQM-1, which binds to GATA-like DAF-16-associated elements (DAEs) in the smf-3 promoter to activate smf-3 transcription. nhr-14 mutants exhibit enhanced resistance to P. aeruginosa infection that in part requires smf-3 as well as other innate immune response genes. Our data implicate NHR-14 as a repressor of iron uptake and the transcriptional innate immune response mediated by PQM-1, showing iron sequestration as an important component of innate immunity in C. elegans.

Using a genetic suppressor screen to rescue the low iron developmental delay phenotype of hif-1(ia4) mutants, we identified NHR-14 as a transcriptional repressor of SMF-3-dependent iron uptake and innate immunity in C. elegans. Loss of nhr-14 increases SMF-3-mediated iron uptake and induces innate immune response genes that contribute to the resistance of nhr-14(tm1473) mutants to P. aeruginosa. These transcriptional responses are regulated in part by the transcription factor PQM-1. Our data support a model whereby C. elegans respond to pathogen infection by reducing NHR-14 abundance, thus allowing PQM-1 to translocate to the nucleus of intestinal cells to activate genes critical for innate immunity and iron uptake. Several C. elegans nuclear receptors, such as DAF-12 (Liu et al., 2013), NHR-49 (Sim and Hibberd, 2016), NHR-25 (Ward et al., 2014), and NHR-114 and NHR-144 (Yuen and Ausubel, 2018), regulate innate immune response genes; however, there is no evidence to date indicating a role for these nuclear receptors in iron metabolism. NHR-14 may thus be unique among nuclear receptors in coupling innate immunity with iron sequestration as a strategy to limit iron to invading intestinal pathogens.

Originally discovered to be induced in response to paraquat-mediated stress (Tawe et al., 1998), PQM-1 has been shown to be responsible for the activation of the DAF-16/FoxO-Class II subset of IIS genes (Tepper et al., 2013). Under normal conditions, the IIS pathway is upregulated by insulin-like peptides via activation of the DAF-2 tyrosine kinase receptor that culminates in the transcription factor DAF-16/FoxO phosphorylation and its cytoplasmic retention. Under stress, IIS signaling is reduced, DAF-16/FoxO is dephosphorylated and driven into the nucleus to activate Class I genes (stress response) and repress Class II genes (metabolism/growth) (Murphy et al., 2003; Tepper et al., 2013). PQM-1 antagonizes DAF-16/FoxO nuclear localization upon increased insulin signaling, resulting in the activation of Class II genes through binding to the DAE (Tepper et al., 2013). In larval stage worms, PQM-1 localizes to the nucleus of intestinal cells, but in adults, PQM-1 becomes mostly cytoplasmic (Dowen et al., 2016; O'Brien et al., 2018; Tepper et al., 2013). Consistent with these studies, we found PQM-1::GFP localized to the nucleus in L4 stage worms fed either control RNAi or nhr-14 RNAi; however, PQM-1::GFP remained nuclear in adults fed nhr-14 RNAi. These data suggest that PQM-1 nuclear localization caused by loss of nhr-14 in adults may be a mechanism to maintain growth via Class II gene activation as well as defend against stress in aged worms. Other signaling pathways are known to regulate PQM-1 subcellular localization, including mTORC/SGK-1, which promotes PQM-1 cytoplasmic localization in intestinal cells (Dowen et al., 2016), and HSP-90, which promotes PQM-1 nuclear localization in neuronal and intestinal cells (O'Brien et al., 2018). PQM-1 has also been shown to have a role in reproductive aging (Templeman et al., 2018).

The enrichment of Class II and innate immune response genes in nhr-14(tm1473) mutants suggest that these mutants may have a survival advantage when challenged with pathogens. As predicted, nhr-14(tm1473) mutants displayed enhanced resistance to P. aeruginosa that require PQM-1. P. aeruginosa infection reduced NHR-14 abundance in wild-type N2 adults, which led to PQM-1 nuclear localization, activation of smf-3 and specific DAF-16/FoxO-Class II genes and increased iron content. The observation that not all DAF-16/FoxO-Class II genes are regulated by PQM-1 in nhr-14(tm1473) mutants suggests other pathways are involved in their regulation. Our data are consistent with a model whereby increased iron uptake by SMF-3 may be a strategy to limit iron to pathogens in the intestinal lumen. It is also possible that iron helps to maintain iron homeostasis during a pathogen infection as it is required by enzymes involved in critical cellular processes.

We found that pqm-1(ok485) mutants displayed similar sensitivity to P. aeruginosa PA14 as wild-type N2 worms consistent with a recent report (O'Brien et al., 2018), but conflicts with two other studies showing pqm-1 is required for resistance to PA14 (Joshi et al., 2016; Shapira et al., 2006). The reason for the conflicting data is unclear, but may be caused by different background strains or different conditions used for pathogen survival assays.

In vertebrates, natural resistance-associated macrophage protein 1 (NRAMP1), a paralog of DMT1, is found in the phagosome membrane of macrophages, where it transports Fe(II) and Mn(II) out of phagosomes, thus restricting growth of pathogens residing within these compartments by limiting iron availability (Lopez and Skaar, 2018; Wessling-Resnick, 2015). DMT1 is highly expressed in duodenal enterocytes where it is a key regulator of intestinal iron absorption (Fleming et al., 1998; Gunshin et al., 1997). The intestinal mucosa also serves as the first line of defense against pathogens. Upon a pathogen infection in intestine, the innate immune response is triggered by the detection of microorganism-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) via pattern-recognition receptors (PRR) (e.g. Tol/Toll-like and NOD-like receptors) that activate pathways regulating the production of anti-microbial proteins and cytokines, as well as the recruitment of acute inflammatory cells (Lopez and Skaar, 2018; Santaolalla et al., 2011). Several studies have shown that DMT1 is induced in response to TNFα (tumor necrosis factor α) and IFNγ (interferon γ) in duodenal enterocytes and bronchial epithelial cells (Laftah et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2005). It was speculated in these studies that the increase in DMT1 is a means to sequester iron to prevent microbial access to host iron and limit pathogenesis. Further investigation is needed to determine a role for DMT1-mediated iron uptake in intestinal innate immunity in vertebrates.

How NHR-14 senses pathogens remain to be determined. Unlike vertebrates, C. elegans lack clear pattern-recognition receptors orthologs, and its single Toll-like receptor is not necessary for immune defense (Cohen and Troemel, 2015; Stuart et al., 2013). A surveillance pathway has been identified in C. elegans that detects microbial-derived toxin damage to core cellular processes, such as translation and mitochondrial respiration, and induces signaling pathways controlling innate immune genes (Pukkila-Worley, 2016). The ligand-binding domain of NHR-14 may sense and bind pathogen-derived molecules or endogenous-produced ligands that facilitate NHR-14 stability or coregulator binding to regulate target genes. NHR-14 is also highly expressed in head neurons, suggesting that neuronal NHR-14 may detect small molecules that could modulate the innate immune response in intestine. NHR-14 was reported to function as an estrogen receptor (Mimoto et al., 2007), but conflicts with other studies showing that estrogen and bisphenol A did not affect NHR-14 function (Allard and Colaiácovo, 2010; Fischer et al., 2012).

Of the 284 NRs in C. elegans, 269 are derived from a HNF4-related ancestor (Robinson-Rechavi et al., 2005). This is unlike mammals that express two HNF4 receptors (HNF4α and HNF4γ) and Drosophila melanogaster that express a single HNF4 (Taubert et al., 2011). Mammalian HNF4α is expressed in liver, kidney, intestine, and the colon where it activates genes involved in glucose, fatty acid, and xenobiotic metabolism (Gonzalez, 2008). HNF4α has been shown to control iron homeostasis in liver and hepatoma cells through the regulation of transferrin, transferrin receptor-1 and hepcidin genes (Matsuo et al., 2015; Truksa et al., 2009). The expansion of the HNF4-related NRs in C. elegans suggests that they may have evolved dedicated functions that are performed by HNF4 in higher organisms (Taubert et al., 2011). Studies have shown that in the plant parasitic nematode Meloidogyne incognita (Abad et al., 2008) and in the human parasitic nematode Brugia malayi (Ghedin et al., 2007) the number of NRs are reduced to 92 and 27, respectively. Of note, NHR-14 is one of four HNF4-related nuclear receptors that is conserved in both parasites, suggesting that NHR-14 may be important for parasite infectivity.

In summary, the identification of NHR-14 adds a new layer of regulation that links iron metabolism with the innate immune response and provides new insights by which C. elegans responds to pathogen infections.

RNA-seq data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE89783. In addition, raw RNA-seq data are reported in the source data files.

1. 1. Rajan M
   2. Anderson CP
   3. Rindler PM
   4. Romney SJ
   5. Ferreira dos Santos MC
   6. Gertz JL
   7. Leibold EA

   (2019) NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus

   ID GSE89783. NHR-14 loss of function couples intestinal iron uptake with innate immunity in C. elegans through PQM-1 signaling.

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE89783

1. 1. Abad P
   2. Gouzy J
   3. Aury JM
   4. Castagnone-Sereno P
   5. Danchin EG
   6. Deleury E
   7. Perfus-Barbeoch L
   8. Anthouard V
   9. Artiguenave F
   10. Blok VC
   11. Caillaud MC
   12. Coutinho PM
   13. Dasilva C
   14. De Luca F
   15. Deau F
   16. Esquibet M
   17. Flutre T
   18. Goldstone JV
   19. Hamamouch N
   20. Hewezi T
   21. Jaillon O
   22. Jubin C
   23. Leonetti P
   24. Magliano M
   25. Maier TR
   26. Markov GV
   27. McVeigh P
   28. Pesole G
   29. Poulain J
   30. Robinson-Rechavi M
   31. Sallet E
   32. Ségurens B
   33. Steinbach D
   34. Tytgat T
   35. Ugarte E
   36. van Ghelder C
   37. Veronico P
   38. Baum TJ
   39. Blaxter M
   40. Bleve-Zacheo T
   41. Davis EL
   42. Ewbank JJ
   43. Favery B
   44. Grenier E
   45. Henrissat B
   46. Jones JT
   47. Laudet V
   48. Maule AG
   49. Quesneville H
   50. Rosso MN
   51. Schiex T
   52. Smant G
   53. Weissenbach J
   54. Wincker P

   (2008) Genome sequence of the metazoan plant-parasitic nematode Meloidogyne incognita

   Nature Biotechnology 26:909–915.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1482

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Ackerman D
   2. Gems D

   (2012) Insulin/IGF-1 and hypoxia signaling act in concert to regulate iron homeostasis in Caenorhabditis elegans

   PLOS Genetics 8:e1002498.

   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002498

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Allard P
   2. Colaiácovo MP

   (2010) Bisphenol A impairs the double-strand break repair machinery in the germline and causes chromosome abnormalities

   PNAS 107:20405–20410.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010386107

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Anderson CP
   2. Shen M
   3. Eisenstein RS
   4. Leibold EA

   (2012) Mammalian iron metabolism and its control by iron regulatory proteins

   Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research 1823:1468–1483.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.05.010

   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Anderson CP
   2. Leibold EA

   (2014) Mechanisms of iron metabolism in Caenorhabditis elegans

   Frontiers in Pharmacology 5:113.

   https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2014.00113

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Antebi A

   (2006) Nuclear hormone receptors in C. elegans

   WormBook.

   https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.64.1

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Au C
   2. Benedetto A
   3. Anderson J
   4. Labrousse A
   5. Erikson K
   6. Ewbank JJ
   7. Aschner M

   (2009) SMF-1, SMF-2 and SMF-3 DMT1 orthologues regulate and are regulated differentially by manganese levels in C. elegans

   PLOS ONE 4:e7792.

   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007792

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Bandyopadhyay J
   2. Song HO
   3. Park BJ
   4. Singaravelu G
   5. Sun JL
   6. Ahnn J
   7. Cho JH

   (2009) Functional assessment of Nramp-like metal transporters and manganese in Caenorhabditis elegans

   Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 390:136–141.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.09.082

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Block DH
   2. Twumasi-Boateng K
   3. Kang HS
   4. Carlisle JA
   5. Hanganu A
   6. Lai TY
   7. Shapira M

   (2015) The developmental intestinal regulator ELT-2 controls p38-Dependent immune responses in adult C. elegans

   PLOS Genetics 11:e1005265.

   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005265

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Braymer JJ
    2. Lill R

    (2017) Iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis and trafficking in mitochondria

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 292:12754–12763.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R117.787101

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Brenner S

    (1974)

    The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans

    Genetics 77:71–94.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Cao J
    2. Packer JS
    3. Ramani V
    4. Cusanovich DA
    5. Huynh C
    6. Daza R
    7. Qiu X
    8. Lee C
    9. Furlan SN
    10. Steemers FJ
    11. Adey A
    12. Waterston RH
    13. Trapnell C
    14. Shendure J

    (2017) Comprehensive single-cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism

    Science 357:661–667.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam8940

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Cohen LB
    2. Troemel ER

    (2015) Microbial pathogenesis and host defense in the nematode C. elegans

    Current Opinion in Microbiology 23:94–101.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2014.11.009

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Cornelis P
    2. Dingemans J

    (2013) Pseudomonas aeruginosa adapts its iron uptake strategies in function of the type of infections

    Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 3:75.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2013.00075

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Doitsidou M
    2. Poole RJ
    3. Sarin S
    4. Bigelow H
    5. Hobert O

    (2010) C. Elegans mutant identification with a one-step whole-genome-sequencing and SNP mapping strategy

    PLOS ONE 5:e15435.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015435

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Dowen RH
    2. Breen PC
    3. Tullius T
    4. Conery AL
    5. Ruvkun G

    (2016) A microRNA program in the C. elegans hypodermis couples to intestinal mTORC2/PQM-1 signaling to modulate fat transport

    Genes & Development 30:1515–1528.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.283895.116

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Eden E
    2. Navon R
    3. Steinfeld I
    4. Lipson D
    5. Yakhini Z

    (2009) GOrilla: a tool for discovery and visualization of enriched GO terms in ranked gene lists

    BMC Bioinformatics 10:48.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-48

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Engelmann I
    2. Griffon A
    3. Tichit L
    4. Montañana-Sanchis F
    5. Wang G
    6. Reinke V
    7. Waterston RH
    8. Hillier LW
    9. Ewbank JJ

    (2011) A comprehensive analysis of gene expression changes provoked by bacterial and fungal infection in C. elegans

    PLOS ONE 6:e19055.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019055

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Fang B
    2. Mane-Padros D
    3. Bolotin E
    4. Jiang T
    5. Sladek FM

    (2012) Identification of a binding motif specific to HNF4 by comparative analysis of multiple nuclear receptors

    Nucleic Acids Research 40:5343–5356.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks190

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Fischer M
    2. Regitz C
    3. Kahl M
    4. Werthebach M
    5. Boll M
    6. Wenzel U

    (2012) Phytoestrogens genistein and daidzein affect immunity in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans via alterations of vitellogenin expression

    Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 56:957–965.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201200006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Fleming MD
    2. Romano MA
    3. Su MA
    4. Garrick LM
    5. Garrick MD
    6. Andrews NC

    (1998) Nramp2 is mutated in the anemic Belgrade (b) rat: evidence of a role for Nramp2 in endosomal iron transport

    PNAS 95:1148–1153.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.3.1148

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Fleming RE
    2. Ponka P

    (2012) Iron overload in human disease

    New England Journal of Medicine 366:348–359.

    https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1004967

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Ghedin E
    2. Wang S
    3. Spiro D
    4. Caler E
    5. Zhao Q
    6. Crabtree J
    7. Allen JE
    8. Delcher AL
    9. Guiliano DB
    10. Miranda-Saavedra D
    11. Angiuoli SV
    12. Creasy T
    13. Amedeo P
    14. Haas B
    15. El-Sayed NM
    16. Wortman JR
    17. Feldblyum T
    18. Tallon L
    19. Schatz M
    20. Shumway M
    21. Koo H
    22. Salzberg SL
    23. Schobel S
    24. Pertea M
    25. Pop M
    26. White O
    27. Barton GJ
    28. Carlow CK
    29. Crawford MJ
    30. Daub J
    31. Dimmic MW
    32. Estes CF
    33. Foster JM
    34. Ganatra M
    35. Gregory WF
    36. Johnson NM
    37. Jin J
    38. Komuniecki R
    39. Korf I
    40. Kumar S
    41. Laney S
    42. Li BW
    43. Li W
    44. Lindblom TH
    45. Lustigman S
    46. Ma D
    47. Maina CV
    48. Martin DM
    49. McCarter JP
    50. McReynolds L
    51. Mitreva M
    52. Nutman TB
    53. Parkinson J
    54. Peregrín-Alvarez JM
    55. Poole C
    56. Ren Q
    57. Saunders L
    58. Sluder AE
    59. Smith K
    60. Stanke M
    61. Unnasch TR
    62. Ware J
    63. Wei AD
    64. Weil G
    65. Williams DJ
    66. Zhang Y
    67. Williams SA
    68. Fraser-Liggett C
    69. Slatko B
    70. Blaxter ML
    71. Scott AL

    (2007) Draft genome of the filarial nematode parasite Brugia malayi

    Science 317:1756–1760.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1145406

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Gonzalez FJ

    (2008) Regulation of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha-mediated transcription

    Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics 23:2–7.

    https://doi.org/10.2133/dmpk.23.2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Gourley BL
    2. Parker SB
    3. Jones BJ
    4. Zumbrennen KB
    5. Leibold EA

    (2003) Cytosolic aconitase and ferritin are regulated by iron in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 278:3227–3234.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M210333200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Gunshin H
    2. Mackenzie B
    3. Berger UV
    4. Gunshin Y
    5. Romero MF
    6. Boron WF
    7. Nussberger S
    8. Gollan JL
    9. Hediger MA

    (1997) Cloning and characterization of a mammalian proton-coupled metal-ion transporter

    Nature 388:482–488.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/41343

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Hood MI
    2. Skaar EP

    (2012) Nutritional immunity: transition metals at the pathogen-host interface

    Nature Reviews Microbiology 10:525–537.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2836

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Huang daW
    2. Sherman BT
    3. Lempicki RA

    (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources

    Nature Protocols 4:44–57.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.211

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Irazoqui JE
    2. Urbach JM
    3. Ausubel FM

    (2010) Evolution of host innate defence: insights from Caenorhabditis elegans and primitive invertebrates

    Nature Reviews Immunology 10:47–58.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2689

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Jiang H
    2. Guo R
    3. Powell-Coffman JA

    (2001) The Caenorhabditis elegans hif-1 gene encodes a bHLH-PAS protein that is required for adaptation to hypoxia

    PNAS 98:7916–7921.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.141234698

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Joshi KK
    2. Matlack TL
    3. Rongo C

    (2016) Dopamine signaling promotes the xenobiotic stress response and protein homeostasis

    The EMBO Journal 35:1885–1901.

    https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201592524

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Kamath RS
    2. Fraser AG
    3. Dong Y
    4. Poulin G
    5. Durbin R
    6. Gotta M
    7. Kanapin A
    8. Le Bot N
    9. Moreno S
    10. Sohrmann M
    11. Welchman DP
    12. Zipperlen P
    13. Ahringer J

    (2003) Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi

    Nature 421:231–237.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01278

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Kang D
    2. Kirienko DR
    3. Webster P
    4. Fisher AL
    5. Kirienko NV

    (2018) Pyoverdine, a siderophore from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, translocates into C. elegans, removes iron, and activates a distinct host response

    Virulence 9:804–817.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2018.1449508

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Kim YI
    2. Cho JH
    3. Yoo OJ
    4. Ahnn J

    (2004) Transcriptional regulation and life-span modulation of cytosolic aconitase and ferritin genes in c.elegans

    Journal of Molecular Biology 342:421–433.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.07.036

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Kim DH
    2. Ewbank JJ

    (2015) Signaling in the innate immune response

    WormBook : The Online Review of C. Elegans Biology pp. 1–35.

    https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.83.2

    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Kirienko NV
    2. Cezairliyan BO
    3. Ausubel FM
    4. Powell JR

    (2014) Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 pathogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Methods in Molecular Biology 1149:653–669.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0473-0_50

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Kirienko NV
    2. Ausubel FM
    3. Ruvkun G

    (2015) Mitophagy confers resistance to siderophore-mediated killing by Pseudomonas aeruginosa

    PNAS 112:1821–1826.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1424954112

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Kniazeva M
    2. Zhu H
    3. Sewell AK
    4. Han M

    (2015) A Lipid-TORC1 pathway promotes neuronal development and foraging behavior under both fed and fasted conditions in C. elegans

    Developmental Cell 33:260–271.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.02.015

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Ladage ML
    2. King SD
    3. Burks DJ
    4. Quan DL
    5. Garcia AM
    6. Azad RK
    7. Padilla PA

    (2016) Glucose or altered ceramide biosynthesis mediate oxygen deprivation sensitivity through novel pathways revealed by transcriptome analysis in Caenorhabditis elegans

    G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 6:3149–3160.

    https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.031583

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Laftah AH
    2. Sharma N
    3. Brookes MJ
    4. McKie AT
    5. Simpson RJ
    6. Iqbal TH
    7. Tselepis C

    (2006) Tumour necrosis factor alpha causes hypoferraemia and reduced intestinal iron absorption in mice

    Biochemical Journal 397:61–67.

    https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20060215

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Liu X
    2. Brutlag DL
    3. Liu JS

    (2001)

    BioProspector: discovering conserved DNA motifs in upstream regulatory regions of co-expressed genes

    Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing pp. 127–138.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Liu F
    2. He CX
    3. Luo LJ
    4. Zou QL
    5. Zhao YX
    6. Saini R
    7. Han SF
    8. Knölker HJ
    9. Wang LS
    10. Ge BX

    (2013) Nuclear hormone receptor regulation of microRNAs controls innate immune responses in C. elegans

    PLOS Pathogens 9:e1003545.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003545

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Lopez CA
    2. Skaar EP

    (2018) The Impact of Dietary Transition Metals on Host-Bacterial Interactions

    Cell Host & Microbe 23:737–748.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2018.05.008

    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Magner DB
    2. Wollam J
    3. Shen Y
    4. Hoppe C
    5. Li D
    6. Latza C
    7. Rottiers V
    8. Hutter H
    9. Antebi A

    (2013) The NHR-8 nuclear receptor regulates cholesterol and bile acid homeostasis in C. elegans

    Cell Metabolism 18:212–224.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2013.07.007

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Mastrogiannaki M
    2. Matak P
    3. Keith B
    4. Simon MC
    5. Vaulont S
    6. Peyssonnaux C

    (2009) HIF-2alpha, but not HIF-1alpha, promotes iron absorption in mice

    Journal of Clinical Investigation 119:1159–1166.

    https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI38499

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Matsuo S
    2. Ogawa M
    3. Muckenthaler MU
    4. Mizui Y
    5. Sasaki S
    6. Fujimura T
    7. Takizawa M
    8. Ariga N
    9. Ozaki H
    10. Sakaguchi M
    11. Gonzalez FJ
    12. Inoue Y

    (2015) Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α controls iron metabolism and regulates transferrin receptor 2 in mouse liver

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 290:30855–30865.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M115.694414

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. McGhee JD

    (2007) The C. elegans intestine

    WormBook.

    https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.133.1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Mimoto A
    2. Fujii M
    3. Usami M
    4. Shimamura M
    5. Hirabayashi N
    6. Kaneko T
    7. Sasagawa N
    8. Ishiura S

    (2007) Identification of an estrogenic hormone receptor in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 364:883–888.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.10.089

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Minevich G
    2. Park DS
    3. Blankenberg D
    4. Poole RJ
    5. Hobert O

    (2012) CloudMap: a cloud-based pipeline for analysis of mutant genome sequences

    Genetics 192:1249–1269.

    https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.112.144204

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Murphy CT
    2. McCarroll SA
    3. Bargmann CI
    4. Fraser A
    5. Kamath RS
    6. Ahringer J
    7. Li H
    8. Kenyon C

    (2003) Genes that act downstream of DAF-16 to influence the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans

    Nature 424:277–283.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01789

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Niu W
    2. Lu ZJ
    3. Zhong M
    4. Sarov M
    5. Murray JI
    6. Brdlik CM
    7. Janette J
    8. Chen C
    9. Alves P
    10. Preston E
    11. Slightham C
    12. Jiang L
    13. Hyman AA
    14. Kim SK
    15. Waterston RH
    16. Gerstein M
    17. Snyder M
    18. Reinke V

    (2011) Diverse transcription factor binding features revealed by genome-wide ChIP-seq in C. elegans

    Genome Research 21:245–254.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.114587.110

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Nix DA
    2. Courdy SJ
    3. Boucher KM

    (2008) Empirical methods for controlling false positives and estimating confidence in ChIP-Seq peaks

    BMC Bioinformatics 9:523.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-523

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. O'Brien D
    2. Jones LM
    3. Good S
    4. Miles J
    5. Vijayabaskar MS
    6. Aston R
    7. Smith CE
    8. Westhead DR
    9. van Oosten-Hawle P

    (2018) A PQM-1-Mediated response triggers transcellular chaperone signaling and regulates organismal proteostasis

    Cell Reports 23:3905–3919.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.093

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Palmer LD
    2. Skaar EP

    (2016) Transition metals and virulence in Bacteria

    Annual Review of Genetics 50:67–91.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-120215-035146

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Pukkila-Worley R

    (2016) Surveillance immunity: an emerging paradigm of innate defense activation in Caenorhabditis elegans

    PLOS Pathogens 12:e1005795.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005795

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Quach TK
    2. Chou HT
    3. Wang K
    4. Milledge GZ
    5. Johnson CM

    (2013) Genome-wide microarrray analysis reveals roles for the REF-1 family member HLH-29 in ferritin synthesis and peroxide stress response

    PLOS ONE 8:e59719.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059719

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Roberts AF
    2. Gumienny TL
    3. Gleason RJ
    4. Wang H
    5. Padgett RW

    (2010) Regulation of genes affecting body size and innate immunity by the DBL-1/BMP-like pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans

    BMC Developmental Biology 10:61.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-10-61

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Robinson-Rechavi M
    2. Maina CV
    3. Gissendanner CR
    4. Laudet V
    5. Sluder A

    (2005) Explosive lineage-specific expansion of the orphan nuclear receptor HNF4 in Nematodes

    Journal of Molecular Evolution 60:577–586.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-004-0175-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Romney SJ
    2. Thacker C
    3. Leibold EA

    (2008) An iron enhancer element in the FTN-1 gene directs iron-dependent expression in Caenorhabditis elegans intestine

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 283:716–725.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M707043200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Romney SJ
    2. Newman BS
    3. Thacker C
    4. Leibold EA

    (2011) HIF-1 regulates iron homeostasis in Caenorhabditis elegans by activation and inhibition of genes involved in iron uptake and storage

    PLOS Genetics 7:e1002394.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002394

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Rouault TA

    (2015) Iron-sulfur proteins hiding in plain sight

    Nature Chemical Biology 11:442–445.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1843

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Santaolalla R
    2. Fukata M
    3. Abreu MT

    (2011) Innate immunity in the small intestine

    Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 27:125–131.

    https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0b013e3283438dea

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Sarov M
    2. Schneider S
    3. Pozniakovski A
    4. Roguev A
    5. Ernst S
    6. Zhang Y
    7. Hyman AA
    8. Stewart AF

    (2006) A recombineering pipeline for functional genomics applied to Caenorhabditis elegans

    Nature Methods 3:839–844.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth933

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Shah YM
    2. Matsubara T
    3. Ito S
    4. Yim SH
    5. Gonzalez FJ

    (2009) Intestinal hypoxia-inducible transcription factors are essential for iron absorption following iron deficiency

    Cell Metabolism 9:152–164.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2008.12.012

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Shapira M
    2. Hamlin BJ
    3. Rong J
    4. Chen K
    5. Ronen M
    6. Tan MW

    (2006) A conserved role for a GATA transcription factor in regulating epithelial innate immune responses

    PNAS 103:14086–14091.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603424103

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Sim S
    2. Hibberd ML

    (2016) Caenorhabditis elegans susceptibility to gut Enterococcus faecalis infection is associated with fat metabolism and epithelial junction integrity

    BMC Microbiology 16:8.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0624-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Simonsen KT
    2. Møller-Jensen J
    3. Kristensen AR
    4. Andersen JS
    5. Riddle DL
    6. Kallipolitis BH

    (2011) Quantitative proteomics identifies ferritin in the innate immune response of C. elegans

    Virulence 2:120–130.

    https://doi.org/10.4161/viru.2.2.15270

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Simonsen KT
    2. Gallego SF
    3. Færgeman NJ
    4. Kallipolitis BH

    (2012) Strength in numbers: "Omics" studies of C. elegans innate immunity

    Virulence 3:477–484.

    https://doi.org/10.4161/viru.21906

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Stuart LM
    2. Paquette N
    3. Boyer L

    (2013) Effector-triggered versus pattern-triggered immunity: how animals sense pathogens

    Nature Reviews Immunology 13:199–206.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3398

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Tan MW
    2. Mahajan-Miklos S
    3. Ausubel FM

    (1999) Killing of Caenorhabditis elegans by Pseudomonas aeruginosa used to model mammalian bacterial pathogenesis

    PNAS 96:715–720.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.2.715

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Taubert S
    2. Ward JD
    3. Yamamoto KR

    (2011) Nuclear hormone receptors in Nematodes: evolution and function

    Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 334:49–55.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2010.04.021

    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Tawe WN
    2. Eschbach ML
    3. Walter RD
    4. Henkle-Dührsen K

    (1998) Identification of stress-responsive genes in Caenorhabditis elegans using RT-PCR differential display

    Nucleic Acids Research 26:1621–1627.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/26.7.1621

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Templeman NM
    2. Luo S
    3. Kaletsky R
    4. Shi C
    5. Ashraf J
    6. Keyes W
    7. Murphy CT

    (2018) Insulin signaling regulates oocyte quality maintenance with age via cathepsin B activity

    Current Biology 28:753–760.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.052

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Tepper RG
    2. Ashraf J
    3. Kaletsky R
    4. Kleemann G
    5. Murphy CT
    6. Bussemaker HJ

    (2013) PQM-1 complements DAF-16 as a key transcriptional regulator of DAF-2-mediated development and longevity

    Cell 154:676–690.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Tjahjono E
    2. Kirienko NV

    (2017) A conserved mitochondrial surveillance pathway is required for defense against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

    PLOS Genetics 13:e1006876.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006876

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Troemel ER
    2. Chu SW
    3. Reinke V
    4. Lee SS
    5. Ausubel FM
    6. Kim DH

    (2006) p38 MAPK regulates expression of immune response genes and contributes to longevity in C. elegans

    PLOS Genetics 2:e183.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0020183

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Truksa J
    2. Lee P
    3. Beutler E

    (2009) Two BMP responsive elements, STAT, and bZIP/HNF4/COUP motifs of the hepcidin promoter are critical for BMP, SMAD1, and HJV responsiveness

    Blood 113:688–695.

    https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-05-160184

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Valentini S
    2. Cabreiro F
    3. Ackerman D
    4. Alam MM
    5. Kunze MB
    6. Kay CW
    7. Gems D

    (2012) Manipulation of in vivo iron levels can alter resistance to oxidative stress without affecting ageing in the nematode C. elegans

    Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 133:282–290.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2012.03.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Visvikis O
    2. Ihuegbu N
    3. Labed SA
    4. Luhachack LG
    5. Alves AF
    6. Wollenberg AC
    7. Stuart LM
    8. Stormo GD
    9. Irazoqui JE

    (2014) Innate host defense requires TFEB-mediated transcription of cytoprotective and antimicrobial genes

    Immunity 40:896–909.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2014.05.002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Wang X
    2. Garrick MD
    3. Yang F
    4. Dailey LA
    5. Piantadosi CA
    6. Ghio AJ

    (2005) TNF, IFN-gamma, and endotoxin increase expression of DMT1 in bronchial epithelial cells

    American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology 289:L24–L33.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00428.2003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
81. 1. Wang H
    2. Jiang X
    3. Wu J
    4. Zhang L
    5. Huang J
    6. Zhang Y
    7. Zou X
    8. Liang B

    (2016) Iron overload coordinately promotes ferritin expression and fat accumulation in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Genetics 203:241–253.

    https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.116.186742

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Ward JD
    2. Mullaney B
    3. Schiller BJ
    4. He LD
    5. Petnic SE
    6. Couillault C
    7. Pujol N
    8. Bernal TU
    9. Van Gilst MR
    10. Ashrafi K
    11. Ewbank JJ
    12. Yamamoto KR

    (2014) Defects in the C. elegans acyl-CoA synthase, acs-3, and nuclear hormone receptor, nhr-25, cause sensitivity to distinct, but overlapping stresses

    PLOS ONE 9:e92552.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092552

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
83. 1. Ward DM
    2. Kaplan J

    (2012) Ferroportin-mediated iron transport: expression and regulation

    Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research 1823:1426–1433.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.03.004

    • Google Scholar
84. 1. Weiss G
    2. Carver PL

    (2018) Role of divalent metals in infectious disease susceptibility and outcome

    Clinical Microbiology and Infection 24:16–23.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2017.01.018

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Wessling-Resnick M

    (2015) Nramp1 and other transporters involved in metal withholding during infection

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 290:18984–18990.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R115.643973

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
86. 1. Wong D
    2. Bazopoulou D
    3. Pujol N
    4. Tavernarakis N
    5. Ewbank JJ

    (2007) Genome-wide investigation reveals pathogen-specific and shared signatures in the response of Caenorhabditis elegans to infection

    Genome Biology 8:R194.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2007-8-9-r194

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
87. 1. Yuen GJ
    2. Ausubel FM

    (2018) Both live and dead enterococci activate Caenorhabditis elegans host defense via immune and stress pathways

    Virulence 9:683–699.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2018.1438025

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

[Editors’ note: a previous version of this study was rejected after peer review, but the authors submitted for reconsideration. The first decision letter after peer review is shown below.]

Thank you for submitting your work entitled "NHR-14 integrates iron uptake and innate immunity in Caenorhabditis elegans through PQM-1 signaling" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by three peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and a Senior Editor.

Our decision has been reached after consultation between the reviewers. Based on these discussions and the individual reviews below, we regret to inform you that your work will not be considered further for publication in eLife.

All the reviewers found the manuscript to be very interesting, but the lack of rigor or in-depth analysis in many areas makes it unsuitable for publication in its current form. The manuscript could be improved by going more in depth on the metal biology or by strengthening the innate immunity aspects. The diversity of the reviewer's suggestions indicate that the revision will likely take more than two months, the time limit in eLife for revision. This is why the paper was rejected. Nevertheless, the authors could consider re-submitting their article to eLife as a new submission once the reviewer's comments have been addressed in full.

Reviewer #1:

The authors had previously discovered a role for the C. elegans HIF1a homolog in regulating intestinal iron homeostasis during iron deficiency by activating and inhibiting genes involved in iron uptake and storage. Taking advantage of a developmental delay phenotype of hif-1(ia4) mutants on low iron media, the authors performed a suppressor screen and uncovered two mutations in a nuclear hormone receptor gene, nhr-14, that rescued the delay. NHR-14 transcript and protein levels were unaffected by iron levels. RNA-seq anaylsis comparing gene expression profiles between wildtype animals and nhr-14 mutants revealed that nhr-14 regulates the iron transport gene smf-3, and innate immunity genes. Analysis of the smf-3 promoter and mining modENCODE ChIP-seq data suggested that PQM-1 acts downstream of NHR-14 to regulate smf-3. The authors explored the role of NHR-14 in innate immunity, demonstrating that in addition to regulating immune genes, nhr-14 mutants were resistant to P. aeruginosa and S. enterica infection, and that bacterial infection downregulated NHR-14 protein levels. Finally, the authors showed that knockdown of the nhr-14 ortholog, HNF4a, in human cells resulted in a similar upregulation of the smf-3 homolog (DMT1). This is an interesting study looking at how nuclear hormone receptors coordinate iron availability and innate immunity, but the manuscript suffers from a lack of details in the genetic analyses, and a lack of exploration of the roles of NHR-14 in innate immunity required to show that the gene expression signature is not simply a consequence of disrupting a core cellular process.

Substantive concerns

1) Elements of the manuscript were difficult to evaluate, as many details about the screen and the genetics were lacking. For the screen, how many genomes were screened? How many mutants were recovered? Was the screen saturating? As this was the first report of a screen, these details should be provided. Additionally, were the suppressors, and the nhr-14(tm1473) pqm-1(ok485) mutants backcrossed? If so, how many times?

2) There is a complete lack of characterization of the nhr-14 mutant strains that hampers evaluation of many elements of the manuscript. Do these strains have normal broodsizes? Do they develop at a normal rate? Do they have a normal lifespan? These questions are particularly important for interpreting the pathogen data. What is the nhr-14(tm1473) allele? Is it a null? Are the three nhr-14 mutants phenotypically equal? If so, that would be particularly interesting as the insertion in the DNA binding domain would be predicted to disrupt DNA binding, but not the activation domains or ligand binding domain, and would support that direct gene regulation by NHR-14 contributes to the suppression of the hif-1a arrest on low iron media.

3) The innate immunity sections are problematic. Melo and Ruvkun (2012) demonstrated that RNAi disruption of core cellular processes induces expression of detoxification and innate immune effectors, even in the absence of toxins or pathogens. Similar to point 1, much more information about the nhr-14 strains needs to be provided to convince the reader that this is specifically an immune phenotype and not due to affecting a core process. The authors claim that NHR-14 is the first C. elegans NHR to be involved in innate immunity (and iron metabolism), but Ward et al., 2014, demonstrated that inactivation of nhr-25 causes sensitivity to a range of stresses and pathogens. Several experiments would help strengthen the immunity sections: i) lifespan on OP50 as a baseline for comparing the pathogen sensitivity data; ii) NHR-14 overexpression, which would be predicted to cause increased sensitivity to pathogens. Kirienko et al., 2013, reported a liquid killing assay for PA14 that involves different pathogenesis mechanisms than plate-based assays and is particularly dependent on iron. This assay would be very useful to evaluate the importance of NHR-14-mediated iron regulation in the context of immunity.

4) A major weakness of the paper is lack of any mechanism of how NHR-14 is regulating PQM-1 and in turn SMF-3, or how pathogenic stress regulates NHR-14 levels. An INS-7 overexpression experiment would be very straightforward.

Reviewer #2:

Elucidating mechanisms that organisms use to mediate iron homeostasis through the regulation of transcription factors and transport proteins is an important objective in the field of metal biology. This manuscript details the interaction of two transcription factors that link iron homeostasis with the response of C. elegans to infection by pathogenic bacteria. The authors performed an innovative forward genetic screen leading to the identification of two mutations in the nhr-14 gene. They used rigorous methods to demonstrate that mutations in nhr-14 cause the phenotype. They characterized the phenotype of nhr-14 mutant animals, including the rescue of the hypersensitivity to low iron phenotype of the hif-1 mutant, an increase in metal content for iron and manganese, an increase in the expression of many genes including smf-3 and multiple genes linked to innate immunity, and an alteration in the localization of the transcription factor PQM-1, and resistance to bacterial infections. They also demonstrate that the loss of the human homolog of NHR-14 causes an increase in the expression of another iron transport protein in vertebrate cells, suggesting a conservation of function of the identified nuclear receptor. The impact and quality of the work found within this manuscript would make it a strong candidate for eLife if the authors address the following concerns:

Major Issues:

1) The authors identified mutations in nhr-14 as suppressors of the low iron hypersensitivity of hif-1, which is an innovative discovery technique. They used powerful positional cloning approaches to clearly demonstrate that the mutations in nhr-14 are the cause of the enhanced growth in low iron. The major question that arises is how does mutation of nhr-14 rescue the hif-1 growth defect, and a key approach is to analyze the phenotype of nhr-14 mutations in an otherwise wild type background. This manuscript would benefit from experiments that compare the growth of nhr-14 mutants to wild type animals in two or three concentrations of BP and two or three concentrations of FAC. If the nhr-14 mutations do indeed act by enhancing iron uptake, then it is predicted that they will enhance growth in BP compared to wild-type animals, and they may be hypersensitive to FAC compared to wild type animals. If these effects are not observed, it would call into question the model that the nhr-14 mutation acts by enhancing iron uptake.

2) The authors argue that the cellular site of action of nhr-14 is intestinal cells, as shown in Figure 9. This conclusion appears to be based on the localization of a NHR-14:GFP fusion protein, as shown in Figure 2D. However, the fusion protein is also expressed in other cell types – at a minimum, the red arrows highlight expression in head neurons. It is not possible to judge from the single image how many other cell types may also express NHR-14. Thus, if the conclusion about cellular site of action is based solely on expression data, then an alternative possibility is that the key site of action is the head neurons, or other cell types that may not be visible in this single image. If the authors want to draw a conclusion about the cellular site of action, then they should do experiments to express NHR-14 in a specific cell type using a heterologous promoter, such as an intestinal specific promoter. I do not think determining the cellular site of action is essential for the main conclusions of the paper, so another approach is for the authors to deemphasize the conclusion that the site of action is intestinal cells.

3) The authors investigated the exciting hypothesis that nhr-14 is regulated by dietary iron. However, the results shown in Figure 2 are negative and support the conclusion that both the transcriptional and translational levels of NHR-14 are unaffected by dietary iron. However, a possible unexplored explanation for the function of NHR-14 in iron homeostasis is that the localization of NHR-14 is altered in response to changes in supplemental iron, since some nuclear receptors are regulated by nuclear localization. The functional characterization of NHR-14 would be more complete with an examination of the localization change when animals expressing the tagged version of NHR-14 are exposed to excess and limited iron conditions.

4) The conclusion that nhr-14 acts through regulation of smf-3 to increase the growth of hif-1 mutants should be considered more rigorously. The authors clearly demonstrate that nhr-14 mutants have higher levels of smf-3 transcript, and SMF-3 is a known iron import protein, leading to the hypothesis that this is the critical target gene for the hif-1 rescue. I acknowledge this is a reasonable and even plausible hypothesis. However, the transcriptional analysis of nhr-14 mutant animals demonstrates that hundreds of transcripts are altered, so in principle any one of these changes, or many of these changes in combination might mediate the hif-1 rescue. The critical issue is what additional evidence can test the smf-3 hypothesis. The authors create a smf-3; nhr-14; hif-1 triple mutant and the rescue is lost, in that these triple mutants do not grow in low iron. My concern is that the smf-3 single mutants may not be able to grow in low iron, in which case this experiment is not really informative. For example, if the authors create a triple mutant with nhr-14, hif-1 and any mutation that causes L1 arrest, they will get this result. To interpret this experiment, the authors should analyze the smf-3 single mutant in BP. If the smf-3 single mutant displays arrested growth, then I think there is no clear interpretation of the double mutant of smf-3 with hif-1 and the triple mutant of smf-1, hif-1 and nhr-14. These data would therefore not support the conclusion that NHR-14 functions in iron homeostasis through smf-3.

5) In Figure 3B, there is a significant increase in the amount of manganese in animals with a mutation in nhr-14. This raises the possibility that the change in manganese levels causes any or all of the nhr-14 mutant phenotypes. It would be helpful if the authors addressed this possibility, certainly in the text and possibly experimentally. Have the authors examined the phenotypes of nhr-14 mutants with respect to excess and limited manganese?

6) The model that NHR-14 works in combination with PQM-1 to reduce the iron in the intestinal lumen through SMF-3 is speculative. For example, there are no measurements of the level of iron in the intestinal lumen. Alternative models are that it is changes in iron in the body of the worm that influence pathogen resistance, or that there is a non-iron based mechanism of pathogen resistance. One possible test of the model could be examining the effect of adding supplemental iron to the pathogenicity of the tested bacteria. This would help to test the prediction that decreasing the iron in the lumen is protective to these animals. In a similar vein, the model suggests that nhr-14 mutant animals are resistant because there is an increase in the expression of smf-3 in these animals. What are the levels of smf-3 expression in mutant animals exposed to pathogenic bacteria? This could be included as part of Figure 7D and 7F. These data would also provide support for the current model.

7) Looking at the pathogen resistance data, it was surprising that the authors decided to pursue further phenotype analysis of the nhr-14 mutant using PA14 rather than S. enterica as the pathogenic bacteria tested. The lifespan phenotype associated with S. enterica was much stronger. The data would be more compelling if Figure 7I was performed with S. enterica. Also in Figure 7I, the intermediate phenotype of the double mutant is hard to interpret and does not support the idea that NHR-14 acts upstream of smf-3. If the loss of NHR-14 makes animals resistant through SMF-3, then the double mutant of nhr-14 and smf-3 would be expected to be as hypersensitive as the single mutant of smf-3.

Reviewer #3:

The paper is well written, the methods are very diverse and appropriately used, and the approach is sound and thorough. The topic is trendy, the interpretations and conclusions are fair and the scientific contribution is significant.

The authors describe a new role for the transcription factor NHR-14, attracting attention to the somewhat understudied extended family of 269 C. elegans HNF4-derived transcription factors. They find a key role for NHR-14 in gut infection handling through iron status modulation (intake by the DMT1/NRAMP2 orthologue SMF-3 and sequestration by FTN-1) and transcriptional regulation of a set of innate immunity-associated genes. Notably, they also identify PQM-1 has a downstream effector that shuttles between the cytosol and the nucleus of enterocytes to directly regulates smf-3 expression.

This study hence connects PQM-1, which is gaining recognition as a major transcription factor in the modulation of C. elegans fat handling, iron metabolism and ageing, to innate immunity. Although expected and supported by two other recent studies, it is an important step toward an understanding of C. elegans innate immunity regulation. Moreover, the upstream role of NHR-14 could not have been inferred from the current literature and it contributes significantly to piecing together the complex network that regulates trade-offs between energy handling and immune responses.

There is a great potential for further studies trying to delineate the exact role of NHR-14 in resistance to infection (it seems specific to certain infections), its upstream regulators (there are hints from mammalian studies, notably specific fatty acids) and how it modulates PQM-1 shuttling, and indirectly DAF-16 shuttling. Connections between immunity, fat metabolism, lipid signalling and aging are being noticed more and more and this study contributes to solving the puzzle.

On a more technical note, I liked the fact that the authors made the effort to accumulate corroborative evidence without relying abusively on a single technical approach. The genetic work is also appreciated (double and triple mutants will make excellent tools for the community). I also liked a couple of points of detail that helped convince me of the interpretations. For instance, the qRT-PCR results give fold increases that match very well the fold increases seen by RNAseq. Also, in Figure 7I, nhr-14 seems to be able to increase smf-3 resistance to P. aeruginosa infection, which is consistent with the idea that NHR-14 increases infection resistance through other genes than smf-3 and iron sequestration alone.

General concerns.

A couple of side issues may have been neglected to ensure that the picture presented is not blown out of proportions (see specific concerns).

The raw and analysed data from the RNAseq and lists of overlapping genes between different datasets should be available. If not, the claims of the authors cannot be verified. It is also common practice to make these datasets available upon publication. It would help the peer-review process if at least the analysed data used in the manuscript were made available to the reviewers.

Although the methods are generally sound, some should be expanded upon to allow for replication of the results. Numbers of animals and/or replicates are low for some experiments and would require additional repeats to meet desirable standards. When it comes to biological replicates, their definition is unclear. One would expect that each biological replicate would be a different population on a different day as interday variability is far greater for C. elegans populations compared to intraday variability, but the low numbers might indicate that biological replicates came from the same day. Clarification is required on this issue.

Specific concerns.

First, the title is slightly misleading. Although the authors provided evidence that a NHR-14 – PQM-1 axis does integrate elements of iron metabolism through SMF-3, the case is less strong when it comes to innate immunity. Indeed, no clear immunity pathway has been defined as it is mostly based on observed enrichment in innate immunity-associated genes in RNAseq analysis without hierarchy. Moreover, direct regulation of innate immunity genes by PQM-1 has not been verified (using biochemical assays, qRT-PCR under infection conditions, or transcriptional reporters in pqm-1 mutant, and/or WT animals under infection conditions). "Integrate" is a too strong word as it suggests pivotal role that is not demonstrated.

Second, SMF-1 and SMF-2 are two other DMT1 homologues in C. elegans and SMF-1 is expressed in the gut just as SMF-3 is. Yet there is no comment on SMF-1 potential role here and its possible regulation by nhr-14, which should have been checked and reported.

The specificity of NHR-14 action on PQM-1 is not clearly established especially in the absence of pathway between the two. Several other high-ranking intestinal transcription factors (ELT-2, DAF-16, SKN-1, ATF-7, NHR-49) have been involved in gut immunity in worms and could have been looked at more carefully, especially when transgenic reporters are available to look at nuclear shuttling (SKN-1::GFP and DAF-16::GFP for instance).

The role of pqm-1 in infection resistance is not clearly established, while nhr-14 and smf-3 are.

HIF-1 is mentioned initially because nhr-14 was found in a suppressor screen for the hif-1 growth defect under iron deprivation, but it is not discussed later, nor is it connected to the findings.

Suggested additional experiments.

– Infections assays with P. aeruginosa and S. enterica on pqm-1 mutants are necessary to demonstrate a functional role of PQM-1 in innate immunity (high priority).

– To corroborate this the PQM-1::GFP strain should be exposed to P. aeruginosa and nuclear shuttling should be observed (high priority).

– Make sure there are at least 3 independent experiments (different days) with a minimum of 30 worms per strain for the infection assays. A good idea would be to simply do the additional experiments required with nhr-14, WT and pqm-1 mutants in parallel (high priority).

– C. elegans gut bacterial infections are performed at adult stage because larvae usually do not take up bacteria. It is essential that the PQM-1::GFP nuclear localisation shift seen in L3 larvae on nhr-14 RNAi is replicated in adult worms to convince that PQM-1 can act upon gut bacterial infection to regulate innate immunity genes (high priority).

– qRT-PCR of smf-1, -2 and -3 in nhr-14 and in pqm-1 at least (double mutants nhr-14;pqm-1 welcome) to demonstrate the specificity of SMF-3 regulation (if time and money are an issue, it is not the highest priority experiment)

– qRT-PCR of pqm-1 in nhr-14 mutant vs WT to confirm the RNAseq data (low priority, up to the good will of the authors)

– Look at DAF-16::GFP vs PQM-1 shuttling in control, nhr-14, and pqm-1 RNAi to confirm the antagonistic shuttling between DAF-16 and PQM-1 and the specificity of the effect of nhr-14 on PQM-1 vs DAF-16 or ELT-2 (medium priority, depending on which other experiments are done)

– P. luminescens, E. faecalis, S. marscens, S. aureus infections would have made sense in Figure 7 given that the authors compare their RNAseq data to datasets on worms infected by these pathogens. This seems particularly valid as Table 2 seems to point toward a more specific role of nhr-14 downregulation in resistance against certain pathogens and not others (low priority, up to the good will of the authors).

– Inclusion of the elt-2 microarray dataset published by Block DH et al., 2015 would make sense in Figure 6 and Table 2, considering that the present article did briefly investigate elt-2. (medium priority).

[Editors’ note: what now follows is the decision letter after the authors submitted for further consideration.]

Thank you for submitting your article "NHR-14 loss of function couples intestinal iron uptake with innate immunity in C. elegans through PQM-1 signaling" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by three peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Tadatsugu Taniguchi as the Senior Editor. The reviewers have opted to remain anonymous.

The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.

Summary:

Elucidating mechanisms that organisms use to mediate iron homeostasis through the regulation of transcription factors and transport proteins is an important objective in the field of metal biology. This manuscript details the interaction of two transcription factors that link iron homeostasis with the response of C. elegans to infection by pathogenic bacteria. The authors performed an innovative forward genetic screen leading to the identification of two mutations in the nhr-14 gene. They used rigorous methods to demonstrate that mutations in nhr-14 cause the phenotype. They showed NHR-14 is expressed in intestinal cells and other cells in the head and does not appear to be regulated by iron. They characterized the phenotype of nhr-14 mutant animals, including the rescue of the hypersensitivity to low iron phenotype of the hif-1 mutant, an increase in metal content for iron, an increase in the expression of many genes including smf-3 and multiple genes linked to innate immunity, nuclear localization of PQM-1, and resistance to bacterial infections. PQM-1 appears to interact directly with the smf-3 promoter. The findings lead to the proposal that pathogenic infections down regulate nhr-14, leading to increased expression of SMF-3, which imports iron into intestinal cells, thereby depriving the pathogen of iron in the lumen of the intestine and limiting its capacity for proliferation. While largely conclusions are supported by the results, some additional experiments are needed to reinforce the major findings.

Essential revisions:

1) Transcriptome analysis. A main concern is with the analysis presented in Figure 5. Apart from the fact that DAVID has not been updated (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/helps/update.html), it contains far less information than C. elegans-specific tools such as WormExp. Running their list through WormExp reveals several very significant overlaps with other datasets, including nhr-8 mutants that merit at least discussion if not investigation.

Further, the authors write, "Among the 261 downregulated genes, there was enrichment in genes involving cellular organization and body morphogenesis, including sqt-1, noah-1 and sym-1 (Figure 5D and Figure 3—source data 1)".

But what is really striking is the number of genes that normally undergo a sharp drop of expression at the L4 to adult transition, many of them expressed in the epidermis. As can be visualized at https://elegans.mdc-berlin.de/cel_ex.html, this applies, for example, to sqt-1, col-17, rol-8 (the top 3 in Figure 5D), as well as to the heterochronic gene lin-42. There is no comment on this very remarkable pattern, nor the simple experiments that might address the question of how it might be related to the continued nuclear localization of PQM-1 into adulthood.

On the same line, the authors write, "Interestingly, we observed less overlap between nhr-14 upregulated genes with Serratia marscens [marcescens] (Wong et al., 2007). The basis for this difference is unknown, but is likely a result of a highly specialized response to S. marscens [marcescens]". If they had used WormExp, they would have seen a very significant overlap with Serratia-induced genes in independent study (Engelmann et al., 2011). And reading that study, there is even the following, "In the current analysis, the results of our previous study of the response to S. marcescens using oligo-arrays [22] stood out. As this was not the case for the results for the response to 2 other bacterial pathogens, and given the underrepresentation in the S. marcescens data set of 'common response genes' [22], this presumably reflects an experimental difference in the strength of the infection for the samples prepared for analysis using oligo-arrays". In other words, the authors' conclusion is unlikely to be correct. And that makes more sense since the screens that used C. elegans to identify S. marcescens virulence factors highlighted a role for iron (see for example the Abstract of PMID: 12660152, and 25070509).

2) The authors clearly demonstrate that nhr-14 mutants have higher levels of smf-3 transcript, and SMF-3 is a known iron import protein, leading to the hypothesis that this is the critical target gene for the hif-1 rescue. I acknowledge this is a reasonable and even plausible hypothesis. However, the transcriptional analysis of nhr-14 mutant animals demonstrates that hundreds of transcripts are altered, so in principle any one of these changes, or many of these changes in combination might mediate the hif-1 rescue. The critical issue is what additional evidence can test the smf-3 hypothesis. The authors create a smf-3; nhr-14; hif-1 triple mutant and the rescue is lost, in that these triple mutants do not grow in low iron. My concern is that the smf-3 single mutants also do not grow in low iron. So, yes nhr-14 requires smf-3 to rescue hif-1, but this is somewhat different from proving that nhr-14 rescues by increasing smf-3 activity. The authors should acknowledge that because the smf-3 single mutant cannot grow in low iron, there are multiple interpretations for the triple mutant.

3) Additional controls:

3A) Figure 3. Results shown in panels B, C, and D lack essential genotype that has to be tested, namely nhr-14,smf-3 double mutant. This genotype is essential to prove that the phenotypes of nhr-14 mutants are mostly mediated by the elevated level of smf-3.

3B) Figure 5E and D. It is nice to see enrichment in PQM-1 binding motif in the promoters of the upregulated genes, but experimentally do these genes really require PQM-1 for their expression? What will be their level of induction in nhr-14, pqm-1 double mutant? I think this experiment is important to prove that pqm-1 regulates these genes downstream of nhr-14.

3C) Figure 6A. This experiment lacks nhr-14, pqm-1 double mutant. Again, this is essential to prove epistatic relations between the two genes.

[Editors’ note: the author responses to the first round of peer review follow.]

All the reviewers found the manuscript to be very interesting, but the lack of rigor or in-depth analysis in many areas makes it unsuitable for publication in its current form. The manuscript could be improved by going more in depth on the metal biology or by strengthening the innate immunity aspects. The diversity of the reviewer's suggestions indicate that the revision will likely take more than two months, the time limit in eLife for revision. This is why the paper was rejected. Nevertheless, the authors could consider re-submitting their article to eLife as a new submission once the reviewer's comments have been addressed in full.

Based on the reviewers’ suggestions and comments, we made substantial changes to the manuscript, including addition of new iron pathogen experiments, reanalysis of RNA-seq data and addition of genetic details, which has resulted in a stronger manuscript.

In this manuscript, we report on the identification of a relatively uncharacterized nuclear receptor-1 (NHR-14) that couples innate immunity with iron sequestration. NHR-14 shares homology with vertebrate HNF4. We identified nhr-14 in a genetic suppressor screen conducted to identify genes that rescues the developmental delay of hif-1 mutants grown under iron limitation. We found that nhr-14 loss of function rescues the hif-1 developmental phenotype through increased expression of the intestinal iron importer SMF-3. Transcriptome studies using nhr-14 mutants revealed enrichment of innate immune response genes, many of which are Class 2 genes reported by Murphy et al. (Nature 2003) to be repressed by DAF-16/FOXO during reduced insulin signaling. More recently, Tepper et al. (Cell 2011) discovered that Class 2 genes were activated by the PQM-1 transcription factor during reduced insulin signaling. Using genetic and biochemical approaches, we showed that smf-3 is a PQM-1 target gene. Given the innate immune response and iron signatures in nhr-14 mutants, we showed that nhr-14 loss of function is required for pathogen resistance and that iron sequestration is a component of the pathogen innate immune response. Several nuclear receptors are known regulators of innate immunity in C. elegans; however, NHR-14 is unique among these receptors in coupling innate immunity with iron sequestration. Our data provide new knowledge into how C. elegans use nuclear receptors to regulate innate immunity and iron availability, and show iron sequestration as an important component of the innate immune response.

We believe that our work is of current interest as several of the genes in nhr-14 mutants have been identified in other stress response pathways in C. elegans. For example, O’Brien et al., 2018, identified PQM-1 as a regulator of transcellular chaperone signaling in neurons and in intestine. Several of the key components of neuronal and intestinal signaling pathways and are upregulated in nhr-14 mutants. Of interest, nhr-14 expression is also enriched in neuronal and intestinal cells, providing further evidence suggesting a role for NHR-14 in these pathways. In another paper, Jiang, et al. (eLife2018) identified a genetic pathway that regulates hypothermia stress, and several of the key genes in this pathway, including a transcription factor and proteases, are upregulated in nhr-14 mutants. It is thus likely that NHR-14 has a function in these pathways.

As NHR-14-PQM-1 represents a new innate immunity pathway, future studies are needed to identify other key components in this pathway and endogenous or exogenous ligands that regulate NHR-14 transcriptional function, and to determine the role of NHR-14 in the stress response pathways described above.

[Editors' note: the author responses to the re-review follow.]

Essential revisions:

1) Transcriptome analysis. A main concern is with the analysis presented in Figure 5. Apart from the fact that DAVID has not been updated (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/helps/update.html), it contains far less information than C. elegans-specific tools such as WormExp. Running their list through WormExp reveals several very significant overlaps with other datasets, including nhr-8 mutants that merit at least discussion if not investigation.

We thank the reviewer for this suggestion.

We compared upregulated and downregulated nhr-14 genes with WormExpv1.0 “mutant” category. We found that 148 upregulated nhr-14 genes out of 568 genes overlapped with genes upregulated in nhr-8 mutants. Also, of interest, 156 upregulated nhr-14 genes overlapped with hyl-2 (encoding ceramide synthase) mutants. Together, these observations suggest a role for nhr-14 in fat metabolism. Iron and lipid metabolism are related and many enzymes involved in lipid metabolism require iron for activity. We added the above gene comparisons to a supplemental table (Figure 6—source data 4).

Using WormExp “tissue” category and Cao et al., 2017 single-cell PCR dataset, we found that downregulated nhr-14 genes are enriched in hypodermis and neurons and nhr-14 upregulated genes are enriched in intestine and neurons. These data are consistent with enriched expression of the NHR-14::GFP::FLAG transgene in intestine and head cells (Figure 3B-D). WormExp “tissue” dataset overlap with upregulated and downregulated nhr-14 genes in reported in Figure 5—source data 1.

Further, the authors write, "Among the 261 downregulated genes, there was enrichment in genes involving cellular organization and body morphogenesis, including sqt-1, noah-1 and sym-1 (Figure 5D and Figure 3—source data 1)".

But what is really striking is the number of genes that normally undergo a sharp drop of expression at the L4 to adult transition, many of them expressed in the epidermis. As can be visualized at https://elegans.mdc-berlin.de/cel_ex.html, this applies, for example, to sqt-1, col-17, rol-8 (the top 3 in Figure 5D), as well as to the heterochronic gene lin-42. There is no comment on this very remarkable pattern, nor the simple experiments that might address the question of how it might be related to the continued nuclear localization of PQM-1 into adulthood.

We examined the developmental expression of the top 50 downregulated nhr-14 genes using MDC-BIMSB. In agreement with this reviewer observations, we found that expression of 42 out of the top 50 downregulated nhr-14 genes were sharply downregulated at the late L4 stage, while only 3 were upregulated. The 3 upregulated genes were enriched in intestine, while downregulated nhr-14 genes were enriched in seam and non-seam hypodermal cells (determined from Cao, et al., 2017 single-cell RNA-seq).

We also examined the developmental expression of the top 50 upregulated nhr-14 genes and found most genes are also downregulated at late L4 (20 genes were unchanged or not in the dataset and 6 were upregulated), but not as sharply as the downregulated nhr-14 genes. Of interest, the 6 genes upregulated at late L4 were DAF-16/FoxO Class II genes (dod-19, dod-21, dod-23, dod-24, oac-14, C32H11.9). qPCR analysis revealed that expression of dod-19, dod-24, oac-14 and clec-41 (dod -21 and C32H11.9 were not assessed) were reduced in nhr-14; pqm-1 (RNAi) mutants, indicating that PQM-1 regulate these genes downstream of nhr-14. These new data are reported in Figure 7. See comment 3B below.

We appreciate the reviewer’s effort in uncovering these interesting observations regarding the developmental expression of nhr-14 genes. We are pursuing how loss of nhr-14 causes the nuclear accumulation of PQM-1 in adults, and how it affects gene expression and aging. However, we prefer not to discuss the developmental expression of upregulated and downregulated nhr-14 genes in this manuscript as it would require inclusion of more datasets as well as experiments. These experiments would require a considerable amount of work to do rigorously. We feel that these experiments are beyond the scope of our manuscript, which is to understand the link between nhr-14 regulation of innate immunity and iron metabolism.

On the same line, the authors write, "Interestingly, we observed less overlap between nhr-14 upregulated genes with Serratia marscens [marcescens] (Wong et al., 2007). The basis for this difference is unknown, but is likely a result of a highly specialized response to S. marscens [marcescens]". If they had used WormExp, they would have seen a very significant overlap with Serratia-induced genes in independent study (Engelmann et al., 2011). And reading that study, there is even the following, "In the current analysis, the results of our previous study of the response to S. marcescens using oligo-arrays [22] stood out. As this was not the case for the results for the response to 2 other bacterial pathogens, and given the underrepresentation in the S. marcescens data set of 'common response genes' [22], this presumably reflects an experimental difference in the strength of the infection for the samples prepared for analysis using oligo-arrays". In other words, the authors' conclusion is unlikely to be correct. And that makes more sense since the screens that used C. elegans to identify S. marcescens virulence factors highlighted a role for iron (see for example the Abstract of PMID: 12660152, and 25070509).

We agree and revised this section. We compared the Engelmann et al., 2011 Serratia dataset with upregulated nhr-14 genes and found that out of 2124 genes in the Engelmann dataset, 237 overlapped with upregulated nhr-14 genes. These data are shown in Figure 6A and listed in Figure 6—source data 1. The Wong et al., 2007 Serratia dataset was deleted.

2) The authors clearly demonstrate that nhr-14 mutants have higher levels of smf-3 transcript, and SMF-3 is a known iron import protein, leading to the hypothesis that this is the critical target gene for the hif-1 rescue. I acknowledge this is a reasonable and even plausible hypothesis. However, the transcriptional analysis of nhr-14 mutant animals demonstrates that hundreds of transcripts are altered, so in principle any one of these changes, or many of these changes in combination might mediate the hif-1 rescue. The critical issue is what additional evidence can test the smf-3 hypothesis. The authors create a smf-3; nhr-14; hif-1 triple mutant and the rescue is lost, in that these triple mutants do not grow in low iron. My concern is that the smf-3 single mutants also do not grow in low iron. So, yes nhr-14 requires smf-3 to rescue hif-1, but this is somewhat different from proving that nhr-14 rescues by increasing smf-3 activity. The authors should acknowledge that because the smf-3 single mutant cannot grow in low iron, there are multiple interpretations for the triple mutant.

We agree and added the sentence:”Given that the smf-3(ok1035) single mutant alone displays a developmental delay under iron limitation, this suggests that other genes in nhr-14(tm1473) mutants might also contribute to the rescue of hif-1(ia4) mutants”.

3) Additional controls:

3A) Figure 3. Results shown in panels B, C, and D lack essential genotype that has to be tested, namely nhr-14,smf-3 double mutant. This genotype is essential to prove that the phenotypes of nhr-14 mutants are mostly mediated by the elevated level of smf-3.

We agree and included iron content of the smf-3(ok1035); nhr-14(tm1473) double mutants (Figure 3B) as well as an image and growth analysis of this mutant on NGM and NGM-BP (low iron) (Figure 3C). We did not include the smf-3; nhr-14 double mutant to the life span analysis in panel D because of its poor growth under iron limitation.

3B) Figure 5E and D. It is nice to see enrichment in PQM-1 binding motif in the promoters of the upregulated genes, but experimentally do these genes really require PQM-1 for their expression? What will be their level of induction in nhr-14, pqm-1 double mutant? I think this experiment is important to prove that pqm-1 regulates these genes downstream of nhr-14.

We agree and used qPCR to measure expression of several upregulated nhr-14 genes in nhr-14(tm1473); pqm-1 (RNAi) and nhr-14(tm1473); Control RNAi worms. qPCR analysis showed reduced expression of Class II genes dod-19, dod-24, clec-41, gst-38 and oac-14 in nhr-14; pqm-1 (RNAi) mutants vs nhr-14; Con (RNAi) worms. The expression of Class II genes ins-7 and lys-2 and Class I genes lys-7 and ftn-1 were not changed in nhr-14; pqm-1 (RNAi) mutants. These data are shown in Figure 7. See response to comment #1.

3C) Figure 6A. This experiment lacks nhr-14, pqm-1 double mutant. Again, this is essential to prove epistatic relations between the two genes.

We agree and measured the survival nhr-14(tm1473); pqm-1 (RNAi) worms after infection with PA14. We found that the nhr-14(tm1473); pqm-1 (RNAi) mutants are more sensitive to PA14 that the nhr-14 single mutant, suggesting that PQM-1 is required for nhr-14(tm1473) resistance. These data are shown in Figure 8A (graph) and Figure 8—source data 1 (survival analysis).

Author details

1. Malini Rajan

   1. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
   2. Molecular Medicine Program, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing—review and editing

   Contributed equally with

   Cole P Anderson, Paul M Rindler and Steven Joshua Romney

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7653-4223

2. Cole P Anderson

   1. Molecular Medicine Program, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
   2. Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft

   Contributed equally with

   Malini Rajan, Paul M Rindler and Steven Joshua Romney

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Paul M Rindler

   1. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
   2. Molecular Medicine Program, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing—review and editing

   Contributed equally with

   Malini Rajan, Cole P Anderson and Steven Joshua Romney

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Steven Joshua Romney

   1. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
   2. Molecular Medicine Program, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—review and editing

   Contributed equally with

   Malini Rajan, Cole P Anderson and Paul M Rindler

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Maria C Ferreira dos Santos

   1. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
   2. Molecular Medicine Program, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

6. Jason Gertz

   1. Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
   2. Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States

   Contribution

   Software, Formal analysis, Methodology

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

7. Elizabeth A Leibold

   1. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
   2. Molecular Medicine Program, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
   3. Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Project administration, Writing—review and editing

   For correspondence

   betty.leibold@genetics.utah.edu

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1000-9503

• 2,242

  Page views

• 363

  Downloads

• 10

  Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.