The long non-coding RNA Cerox1 is a post transcriptional regulator of mitochondrial complex I catalytic activity
Abstract
To generate energy efficiently, the cell is uniquely challenged to co-ordinate the abundance of electron transport chain protein subunits expressed from both nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. How an effective stoichiometry of this many constituent subunits is co-ordinated post-transcriptionally remains poorly understood. Here we show that Cerox1, an unusually abundant cytoplasmic long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), modulates the levels of mitochondrial complex I subunit transcripts in a manner that requires binding to microRNA-488-3p. Increased abundance of Cerox1 cooperatively elevates complex I subunit protein abundance and enzymatic activity, decreases reactive oxygen species production, and protects against the complex I inhibitor rotenone. Cerox1 function is conserved across placental mammals: human and mouse orthologues effectively modulate complex I enzymatic activity in mouse and human cells, respectively. Cerox1 is the first lncRNA demonstrated, to our knowledge, to regulate mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and, with miR-488-3p, represent novel targets for the modulation of complex I activity.
Data availability
Microarray data are available through ArrayExpress, accession code E-MATB-6792
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Wellcome (WT106956/Z/15/Z)
- Tamara M Sirey
- Oscar Bedoya-Reina
- Sebastian Rogatti-Granados
- Chris P Ponting
European Research Council (249869)
- Tamara M Sirey
- Kenny Roberts
- Ana Claudia Marques
- Chris P Ponting
Wellcome (WT100981/z/13/z)
- Roderick N Carter
- Nicholas M Morton
Medical Research Council
- Wilfried Haerty
- Chris P Ponting
Diabetes UK
- Lisa C Heather
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Detlef Weigel, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Germany
Version history
- Received: January 10, 2019
- Accepted: May 2, 2019
- Accepted Manuscript published: May 2, 2019 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: May 30, 2019 (version 2)
- Version of Record updated: August 12, 2019 (version 3)
Copyright
© 2019, Sirey et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 4,637
- Page views
-
- 646
- Downloads
-
- 39
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, PubMed Central, Crossref.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
- Cell Biology
Antibodies are critical reagents to detect and characterize proteins. It is commonly understood that many commercial antibodies do not recognize their intended targets, but information on the scope of the problem remains largely anecdotal, and as such, feasibility of the goal of at least one potent and specific antibody targeting each protein in a proteome cannot be assessed. Focusing on antibodies for human proteins, we have scaled a standardized characterization approach using parental and knockout cell lines (Laflamme et al., 2019) to assess the performance of 614 commercial antibodies for 65 neuroscience-related proteins. Side-by-side comparisons of all antibodies against each target, obtained from multiple commercial partners, have demonstrated that: (i) more than 50% of all antibodies failed in one or more applications, (ii) yet, ~50–75% of the protein set was covered by at least one high-performing antibody, depending on application, suggesting that coverage of human proteins by commercial antibodies is significant; and (iii) recombinant antibodies performed better than monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies. The hundreds of underperforming antibodies identified in this study were found to have been used in a large number of published articles, which should raise alarm. Encouragingly, more than half of the underperforming commercial antibodies were reassessed by the manufacturers, and many had alterations to their recommended usage or were removed from the market. This first study helps demonstrate the scale of the antibody specificity problem but also suggests an efficient strategy toward achieving coverage of the human proteome; mine the existing commercial antibody repertoire, and use the data to focus new renewable antibody generation efforts.