Sleep is essential for our physical and mental health. A lack of sleep can affect our energy and concentration levels and is often linked to chronic illnesses and mood disorders.

Sleep is controlled by an internal clock in our brain that operates on a 24-hour cycle, telling our bodies when we are tired and ready for bed, or fresh and alert to start a new day. In addition, the brain tracks the need for sleep and drives the recovery of sleep after periods of prolonged wakefulness – a process known as sleep-wake homeostasis.

Chemical messengers in the brain such as dopamine and serotonin also play an important part in regulating our sleep drive. While dopamine keeps us awake, serotonin can both prevent us from and help us falling asleep, depending on the part of the brain in which it is released.

Most research has focused on the role of different brain circuits on sleep, but it has been shown that a certain type of brain cell, known as astrocyte, may also be important for sleep regulation. So far, it has been unclear if astrocytes could be involved in regulating the need for recovery sleep after a sleep-deprived night – also known as rebound sleep.

Now, Davla, Artiushin et al. used sleep-deprived fruit flies to investigate this further. The flies were kept awake over 12 hours (from 6pm to 6am), using intermittent physical agitation. The researchers found that astrocytes in the brains of fruit flies express a molecule called AANAT1, which peaked at the beginning of the night, declined as the night went on and recovered by morning. In sleep deprived flies, it inactivated the chemical messengers and so lowered the amount of dopamine and serotonin in the brain.

However, in mutant flies that lacked AANAT1, both dopamine and serotonin levels increased in the brain after sleep deprivation. When AANAT1 was selectively removed from astrocytes only, sleep-deprived flies needed more rebound sleep during the day to make up for lost sleep at night. This shows that both astrocytes and AANAT1 play a crucial role in sleep homeostasis.

Molecules belonging to the AANAT family exist in both flies and humans, and these results could have important implications for the science of sleep. The study of Davla, Artiushin et al. paves the way for understanding the mechanisms of sleep homeostasis that are similar in both organisms, and may in the future, help to identify sleep drugs that target astrocytes and the molecules they express.

Characteristic features of sleep are conserved among species (Pimentel et al., 2016), and from humans to insects sleep is influenced by neural circuits involving monoamines such as serotonin and dopamine (Nall and Sehgal, 2014). Glial cells are known to take up and metabolize monoamines (Inazu et al., 2003; Pelton et al., 1981; Suh and Jackson, 2007; Takeda et al., 2002) and they have been increasingly implicated in mechanisms of baseline and homeostatic sleep regulation in mammals and flies (Artiushin et al., 2018; Briggs et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2015; Clasadonte et al., 2017; Farca Luna et al., 2017; Frank, 2013; Gerstner et al., 2017; Halassa et al., 2007; Haydon, 2017; Pelluru et al., 2016; Seugnet et al., 2011; Stahl et al., 2018; Vanderheyden et al., 2018; Walkowicz et al., 2017), but it remains unknown whether and how glia might influence monoaminergic control of sleep. Sleep is regulated by circadian clocks and a homeostatic drive to compensate for prolonged wakefulness, and growing evidence suggests that neural mechanisms controlling homeostatic sleep can be discriminated from those controlling baseline sleep (Artiushin and Sehgal, 2017; Donlea et al., 2017; Dubowy and Sehgal, 2017; Liu et al., 2016). In Drosophila, mutants of arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase 1 (AANAT1^lo) were reported to have normal baseline amounts of sleep and motor activity, but increased recovery sleep (‘rebound’) following deprivation (Shaw et al., 2000). AANAT1 corresponds to speck, a long-known mutation characterized by a darkly pigmented region at the wing hinge (Spana et al., 2020). AANAT1 can acetylate and inactivate monoamines in vitro (Hintermann et al., 1995), but the role of AANAT1 in vivo remains poorly understood.

We report here that AANAT1 is expressed in astrocytes and subsets of neurons in the adult Drosophila brain, with levels in astrocytes first rising then declining markedly overnight. In sleep deprived AANAT1 mutant flies, heightened recovery sleep is accompanied by increased serotonin and dopamine levels in the brain. With cell type selective AANAT1 knockdown, we find that AANAT1 functions in astrocytes, but not neurons, to limit the amount of recovery sleep that flies take in response to sleep deprivation (SD). These findings identify a critical role for astrocytes in the regulation of monoamine bioavailability and calibration of the response to sleep need.

Results and discussion

We generated antiserum to AANAT1 (known previously as Dopamine acetyltransferase (Dat)) and confirmed its specificity with immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the embryonic central nervous system (CNS). AANAT1 immunoreactivity was observed in the cytoplasm of many cells (Figure 1A) but was absent in age-matched ventral nerve cords of embryos that were homozygous for a deletion of the entire AANAT1 gene (Figure 1B). In adult brains co-immunostained with anti-Bruchpilot (nc82, Figure 1C), a presynaptic marker that labels neuropil regions, AANAT1 was present in distinct populations of cells throughout the brain. We found that AANAT1 was expressed in sub-populations of neurons (anti-Elav positive (⁺), Figure 1D,D') and glia (anti-Repo⁺, Figure 1E,E') throughout the brain. In glial cells AANAT1 was primarily cytoplasmic, but in neurons AANAT1 often appeared to localize to the nucleus. With the astrocyte-specific Alrm-Gal4 driving expression of a Red Fluorescent Protein (RFP) reporter (Alrm >nuRFP), we confirmed that all AANAT1-positive glial cells in the central brain are astrocytes (Figure 1F–F''). Only a subset of astrocytes in the optic lobes that reside between the medulla and lobula did not express AANAT1 (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). With RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated knockdown of AANAT1 from all neurons using the driver nSyb-Gal4, the AANAT1-positive glial cells in the central brain could be identified more clearly as astrocytes by their ramified morphology, where AANAT1 could be observed in their thin, neuropil-infiltrating processes (Figure 1—figure supplement 1D,G,H).Their identity as astrocytes was further confirmed by the morphologies of single cells labeled with the Multi-Color Flp-OUT (MCFO) system (Figure 1G). In contrast to astrocytes, AANAT1 expression was absent from ensheathing glia marked by R56F03-Gal4 (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B).

Figure 1 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Labeling of astrocytes was confirmed to be specific for AANAT1 because it was lost upon knockdown of AANAT1 from astrocytes with Alrm-Gal4 or Repo-Gal4 (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C,E,I,J). This also revealed more clearly the several clusters of AANAT1-positive neurons and their axon tracts in the central complex of the brain, which we examined in brain regions associated with sleep regulation (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C,E). AANAT1 expression was largely absent from the neuropils of the mushroom body (MB) and fan-shaped body (FSB), though there were scattered AANAT1-positive astrocytes nearby. AANAT1 expression in the neuropil of the ellipsoid body (EB) came almost exclusively from neurons, as revealed by neuron-selective RNAi knockdown (Figure 1—figure supplement 1K–Q). Elsewhere, it appeared that astrocytes contributed far more to AANAT1 labeling of brain neuropil regions than did neurons; for example, in the antennal lobe (Figure 1E,F) and subesophageal ganglion (Figure 1—figure supplement 1D), AANAT1 expression within neuropil regions came primarily from the infiltrative processes of astrocytes.

The monoamines serotonin, dopamine, and octopamine (the insect equivalent of norepinephrine) are known to act in the fly brain to regulate the quantity and timing of sleep (Nall and Sehgal, 2014). Pharmacological, genetic, and thermogenetic approaches have converged to demonstrate that serotonin signaling in the fly brain increases sleep, whereas dopamine or octopamine signaling promote waking (Andretic et al., 2005; Artiushin and Sehgal, 2017; Kume et al., 2005; Nall and Sehgal, 2014; Qian et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2008; Yuan et al., 2005). Previous studies have suggested AANAT1 to be expressed in dopaminergic neurons (Ganguly-Fitzgerald et al., 2006; Shao et al., 2011), but this has not been tested directly. With IHC, we examined AANAT1 co-labeling of serotonergic, dopaminergic and octopaminergic neurons using a mCD8-GFP reporter driven by either Trh-Gal4 (Alekseyenko et al., 2010), TH-Gal4 (Friggi-Grelin et al., 2003), or Tdc2-Gal4 (Monastirioti et al., 1995), respectively. AANAT1 was expressed in an average of 14.5 ± 4.8 of 60 ± 3.4 (25%) of serotonergic cells labeled with Trh >mCD8 GFP (Figure 1H,I–I'',N), which were found largely in a cluster within the medial subeosophageal ganglion (Figure 1H). However, AANAT1 did not co-label cells expressing TH >mCD8 GFP or Tdc2 >mCD8 GFP (Figure 1J,K–K'', L,M–M'', N), indicating AANAT1 is not expressed in dopaminergic or octopaminergic neurons. These results are corroborated by single-cell RNA sequencing data showing AANAT1 transcripts in astrocytes and serotonergic neurons (Croset et al., 2018).

To identify the other types of neurons expressing AANAT1, we used a mCD8-GFP reporter driven by either MiMIC-vGlut, Gad1-Gal4, or Cha-Gal4 and found AANAT1 in sub-populations of neurons that release glutamate, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), or acetylcholine, respectively (Figure 1—figure supplement 1R-W''). Monoamines are mainly synthesized in the neurons that release them, and it is generally understood that their re-uptake into these same neurons occurs via specific transport proteins to prevent their accumulation at synapses (Martin and Krantz, 2014). Absence of AANAT1 from dopaminergic or octopaminergic neurons showed that cells that produce and release monoamines do not necessarily contribute to their catabolism via AANAT1. However, the presence of AANAT1 in subsets of glutamatergic, GABAergic and cholinergic neurons suggests that, along with astrocytes, these non-monoaminergic neurons could contribute to regulation of monoamine bioavailability in the brain.

The AANAT1 gene produces two protein isoforms, the shorter of which (FlyBase AANAT1-PA, 240aa in length), previously known as aaNAT1b, is more predominant (Brodbeck et al., 1998). This shorter isoform was observed to be lost in AANAT1^lo mutants (Hintermann et al., 1996). AANAT1^lo is a spontaneous mutation that arose from insertion of a transposable element into the AANAT1 gene, and tissue extracts from these flies have reduced AANAT1 activity (Hintermann et al., 1996; Maranda and Hodgetts, 1977). Using our new AANAT1 antiserum to perform western blotting of brain extracts, we observed only the shorter isoform in controls (Figure 2A). In AANAT1^lo homozygotes and hemizygotes (AANAT1^lo/In(2LR)Px[4]), AANAT1 protein levels were reduced to 13 and 8% of iso31 controls, respectively (Figure 2A,B). This was confirmed with IHC in the brains of AANAT1^lo flies (Figure 2C–E), where we noted residual AANAT1 expression in some Elav⁺ neurons, but complete loss of AANAT1 from astrocytes (Figure 2F–F', G–G').

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

In vitro studies have shown that serotonin and dopamine are substrates for AANAT1 with similar affinities (Hintermann et al., 1995). Whether the levels of these and/or other monoamines are regulated by AANAT1 in vivo remains to be determined. We used High Performance Liquid Chromatography - Mass Spectrometry (HPLC-MS) to measure levels of serotonin, dopamine, and octopamine in the brains of AANAT1^lo flies and controls (iso31) (Figure 2H). Under baseline sleep-cycle conditions, where brain tissues were collected in a 3 hr window after lights-ON (ZT0), serotonin and dopamine levels in AANAT1^lo flies were similar to controls (Figure 2I). Octopamine was undetectable in controls and was found at low levels in brains of AANAT1^lo flies (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B). However, if this window was preceded by 12 hr (ZT12-ZT24) of SD overnight, AANAT1^lo brains had a robust increase in the levels of serotonin and dopamine compared to controls (Figure 2I), but this had no effect on octopamine levels (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B). Importantly, in control animals the SD protocol itself did not appear to affect the levels of measured monoamines, or of AANAT1 itself (Figure 2J,K). Further, we did not observe changes in the levels of another monoamine catabolic enzyme known to be expressed in astrocytes (Ebony) in either AANAT1^lo flies, or in flies subjected to SD (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A,C). We conclude that catabolism of serotonin and dopamine in the brains of flies lacking AANAT1 is severely compromised upon SD, leading to inappropriate accumulation of these monoamines.

The AANAT1^lo mutation increases homeostatic sleep following deprivation (Shaw et al., 2000), suggesting AANAT1 could be key to how the brain limits the homeostatic response to sleep need. AANAT1^lo is also interesting because these flies were reported to have normal motor activity, and intact daily patterns of sleep (Shaw et al., 2000), allowing genetic dissection of homeostatic sleep- control independent of the regulation of baseline sleep. We wondered whether the increased recovery sleep seen in AANAT1^lo animals could be explained by loss of AANAT1 function from neurons or astrocytes. To test this, we selectively knocked down AANAT1 in distinct cell types with RNAi and measured both baseline and homeostatic sleep with the Drosophila Activity Monitoring System (DAMS). To evaluate the contribution of neuronal AANAT1 to sleep, we tested nSyb-Gal4 >UAS-AANAT1-RNAi flies, using two independent RNAi lines that target the AANAT1 transcript at distinct sites. Knockdown of AANAT1 in neurons with either line resulted in normal patterns of baseline sleep (Figure 3A–H), as reported for the AANAT1^lo allele (Shaw et al., 2000). While awake during daytime, these animals had lower levels of activity than controls carrying either the GAL4 or UAS transgene alone (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A,B), but their total daytime sleep amount was similar to at least one of the controls (Figure 3B,F), as were the length of daytime sleep bouts (Figure 3C,G) and their number (Figure 3D,H). When we examined the amount of nighttime sleep compared to controls, we found that one RNAi line (AANAT-RNAi 2, JF02142), but not the other (AANAT-RNAi 1, HMS01617), led to increased amount of nighttime sleep (Figure 3B,F). For knockdown with this RNAi line only, sleep bouts during the night were increased in duration and decreased in number, suggesting improved sleep consolidation at night (Figure 3C–D;G-H). We then assessed whether AANAT1 knockdown in neurons (nSyb >AANAT1 RNAi) would impact sleep recovery after SD, as was observed in AANAT1^lo flies. For this, flies were subjected to overnight mechanical SD and we found, somewhat surprisingly, that these flies did not display enhanced recovery sleep the next day (Figure 3I–L).

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Next, we used Alrm-Gal4 to selectively deplete AANAT1 expression from astrocytes with RNAi (Alrm >AANAT1 RNAi). This had no effect on the numbers of astrocytes present in the brain (Figure 4A). These flies showed normal baseline patterns and amounts of daytime and nighttime sleep compared to controls (Figure 4B–E), but while awake they were less active than controls (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A,B). However, upon overnight mechanical SD, these flies had increased recovery sleep the next day (Figure 4F–I), mimicking AANAT1^lo flies (Figure 4—figure supplement 1C–E). Like AANAT1 loss-of-function, AANAT1 overexpression in astrocytes also increased recovery sleep following deprivation (Figure 4—figure supplement 1F), underscoring the importance of regulated astrocytic AANAT1 levels in sleep homeostasis.

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

We characterized AANAT1 expression in astrocytes during pupal development with immunochemistry, and found AANAT1 to be expressed weakly in only a few astrocytes at 48 hr after puparium formation (APF), then gradually more strongly in most but not all astrocytes at 72 hr and 96 hr APF (Figure 4—figure supplement 1G-I''). To investigate when AANAT1 functions in astrocytes for sleep recovery, we used the Temporal And Regional Gene Targeting (TARGET) system (McGuire et al., 2004) to knock down AANAT1 in adult astrocytes with Eaat1-Gal4. In the brain, Eaat1-Gal4 is a driver line for astrocytes (which express AANAT1) and cortex glia (which do not). When adult flies were raised at 32°C to deplete AANAT1 from glia using RNAi, these animals showed increased recovery sleep compared to the UAS control but not the Gal4 control (Figure 4—figure supplement 1J-K).

Our results demonstrate that AANAT1 acts in astrocytes, but not in neurons, to restrict daytime recovery sleep in response to overnight SD. With HPLC-MS, we noted that astrocyte-selective AANAT1 knockdown led to increased levels of brain serotonin and dopamine after SD in most samples compared to controls (Figure 4J). This did not reach statistical significance however, perhaps because of an outlier in each of the control groups, or perhaps because AANAT1 knockdown in astrocytes affects the levels of only a portion of serotonin and dopamine in the brain, albeit an important portion with respect to sleep homeostasis. Together with the clear increases seen in AANAT1^lo flies (Figure 2I), these data suggest that Drosophila astrocytes employ AANAT1 to limit accumulation of serotonin and dopamine upon SD.

Since loss of AANAT1 does not affect astrocyte numbers or their terminal differentiation, we think it unlikely to play a developmental role and favor the idea that AANAT1 functions in mature astrocytes to limit recovery sleep. To shed light on when AANAT1 might be active with respect to sleep homeostasis, with IHC we examined AANAT1 under baseline sleep-cycle conditions at 3 hr intervals during the light and dark period. In the dark period ZT12-ZT24, the patterns of AANAT1 expression in sleep regulatory regions the MB, FSB and EB were unchanged compared to the light period patterns described above (data not shown). In addition, we never observed obvious changes of AANAT1 levels in astrocytes over the course of the light period ZT0-ZT12. Interestingly, during the dark phase most astrocytes throughout the brain showed obvious changes of AANAT1 levels. Dark period AANAT1 expression in astrocyte cell bodies peaked at ZT15, declined markedly to undetectable levels by ZT21 (Figure 4K), and was re-established at lights-ON (ZT24). From this we speculate that the loss of AANAT1 might have profound influence on sleep homeostasis near ZT15, when AANAT1 levels in astrocytes are usually highest, or during daytime when the increased recovery sleep occurs.

AANAT1 is expressed in astrocytes that reside throughout the brain, and so it remains unclear whether it modulates sleep homeostasis by acting within a particular region of the brain, or more broadly. Interestingly, the neuropils of key sleep centers (MB, EB and FSB; Figure 1—figure supplement 1K–Q) had no AANAT1 staining from infiltrative astrocytes, raising the likelihood it acts elsewhere. Finally, it remains to be established whether the effect of AANAT1 on sleep homeostasis is due to serotonin, dopamine, or both. In Drosophila, serotonergic signaling in the brain promotes sleep, while dopaminergic signaling promotes waking. Levels of both serotonin and dopamine are upregulated in AANAT1^lo mutants upon SD, where increased sleep prevails. It stands to reason that AANAT1 could act in astrocytes to limit the deprivation-dependent accumulation of sleep-promoting serotonin. It is also possible that dopamine accumulation plays a role, since thermogenetic activation of wake-promoting dopaminergic neurons at night promotes compensatory sleep the next day. This suggests these particular neurons are upstream of circuits that produce homeostatic responses to extended wakefulness (Dubowy and Sehgal, 2017; Seidner et al., 2015), and astrocytic AANAT1 could somehow restrict dopaminergic signaling from these neurons overnight.

Our findings illustrate a newly discovered role for astrocytes in the control of monoamine bioavailability and homeostatic sleep drive, where they are specifically engaged to catabolize monoamines whose levels are elevated by overnight SD. Drosophila astrocytes also express the enzyme Ebony, which couples dopamine to N-β-alanine (Suh and Jackson, 2007), and a receptor for octopamine and tyramine (Ma et al., 2016), reinforcing how they are well-equipped to metabolize monoamines, and to monitor and respond to monoaminergic neuronal activity. Neither gene expression studies nor RNA sequencing databases provide evidence for monoamine-synthesizing enzymes in Drosophila astrocytes, so it appears likely that monoamines inactivated by AANAT1 in astrocytes are brought into these cells by an unidentified transporter. Astrocytes are particularly well-suited for regulating sleep in this way because they have ramified processes that infiltrate neuropil regions to lie in close proximity to synapses. SD can seemingly reduce the degree of contact between astrocytes and neurons in the fly brain (Vanderheyden et al., 2019), and so it is possible that these structural changes could influence monoamine uptake and inactivation by astrocytes.

In neurons, AANAT1 may function to limit sleep consolidation at night, but evidence for this came from only one of the two RNAi lines used in this study and was not observed in AANAT1^lo mutants (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A). Further studies are needed to characterize sleep-control functions of AANAT1 in neurons, if any, to understand better how cellular context can impact AANAT1 function in sleep regulation. In light of this, we note that loss of the related enzyme aanat2 in zebrafish larvae decreases baseline sleep (Gandhi et al., 2015), which could be attributed to a loss of melatonin since the AANAT1 product N-acetylserotonin is an intermediate in the synthesis of melatonin in vertebrates (Hintermann et al., 1996). Clearly, the appropriate balance and cellular context of AANAT activity is critical for the regulation of sleep, and we show here in Drosophila that astrocytes are an important contributor to this balance. Interestingly, astrocytes in rodents express the monoamine transporters and receptors for dopamine and serotonin (Bacq et al., 2012; Baganz et al., 2008; Huang et al., 2012; Petrelli et al., 2020; Sandén et al., 2000; Vaarmann et al., 2010), raising the possibility that astrocytes in mammals might also participate in mechanisms of sleep regulation involving monoaminergic neural signaling.

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

1. 1. Alekseyenko OV
   2. Lee C
   3. Kravitz EA

   (2010) Targeted manipulation of serotonergic neurotransmission affects the escalation of aggression in adult male Drosophila melanogaster

   PLOS ONE 5:e10806.

   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010806

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Andretic R
   2. van Swinderen B
   3. Greenspan RJ

   (2005) Dopaminergic modulation of arousal in Drosophila

   Current Biology 15:1165–1175.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.025

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Artiushin G
   2. Zhang SL
   3. Tricoire H
   4. Sehgal A

   (2018) Endocytosis at the Drosophila blood-brain barrier as a function for sleep

   eLife 7:e43326.

   https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43326

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Artiushin G
   2. Sehgal A

   (2017) The Drosophila circuitry of sleep-wake regulation

   Current Opinion in Neurobiology 44:243–250.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2017.03.004

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Bacq A
   2. Balasse L
   3. Biala G
   4. Guiard B
   5. Gardier AM
   6. Schinkel A
   7. Louis F
   8. Vialou V
   9. Martres MP
   10. Chevarin C
   11. Hamon M
   12. Giros B
   13. Gautron S

   (2012) Organic cation transporter 2 controls brain norepinephrine and serotonin clearance and antidepressant response

   Molecular Psychiatry 17:926–939.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2011.87

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Baganz NL
   2. Horton RE
   3. Calderon AS
   4. Owens WA
   5. Munn JL
   6. Watts LT
   7. Koldzic-Zivanovic N
   8. Jeske NA
   9. Koek W
   10. Toney GM
   11. Daws LC

   (2008) Organic cation transporter 3: keeping the Brake on extracellular serotonin in serotonin-transporter-deficient mice

   PNAS 105:18976–18981.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800466105

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Briggs C
   2. Hirasawa M
   3. Semba K

   (2018) Sleep deprivation distinctly alters glutamate transporter 1 apposition and excitatory transmission to orexin and MCH neurons

   The Journal of Neuroscience 38:2505–2518.

   https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2179-17.2018

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Brodbeck D
   2. Amherd R
   3. Callaerts P
   4. Hintermann E
   5. Meyer UA
   6. Affolter M

   (1998) Molecular and biochemical characterization of the aaNAT1 (Dat) locus in Drosophila melanogaster: differential expression of two gene products

   DNA and Cell Biology 17:621–633.

   https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.1998.17.621

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Chen WF
   2. Maguire S
   3. Sowcik M
   4. Luo W
   5. Koh K
   6. Sehgal A

   (2015) A neuron-glia interaction involving GABA transaminase contributes to sleep loss in sleepless mutants

   Molecular Psychiatry 20:240–251.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2014.11

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Clasadonte J
    2. Scemes E
    3. Wang Z
    4. Boison D
    5. Haydon PG

    (2017) Connexin 43-Mediated astroglial metabolic networks contribute to the regulation of the Sleep-Wake cycle

    Neuron 95:1365–1380.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.08.022

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Croset V
    2. Treiber CD
    3. Waddell S

    (2018) Cellular diversity in the Drosophila midbrain revealed by single-cell transcriptomics

    eLife 7:e34550.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34550

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Donlea JM
    2. Alam MN
    3. Szymusiak R

    (2017) Neuronal substrates of sleep homeostasis; lessons from flies, rats and mice

    Current Opinion in Neurobiology 44:228–235.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2017.05.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Dubowy C
    2. Sehgal A

    (2017) Circadian rhythms and sleep in Drosophila melanogaster

    Genetics 205:1373–1397.

    https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.185157

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Farca Luna AJ
    2. Perier M
    3. Seugnet L

    (2017) Amyloid precursor protein in Drosophila Glia Regulates Sleep and Genes Involved in Glutamate Recycling

    The Journal of Neuroscience 37:4289–4300.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2826-16.2017

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Frank MG

    (2013) Astroglial regulation of sleep homeostasis

    Current Opinion in Neurobiology 23:812–818.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2013.02.009

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Friggi-Grelin F
    2. Coulom H
    3. Meller M
    4. Gomez D
    5. Hirsh J
    6. Birman S

    (2003) Targeted gene expression in Drosophila dopaminergic cells using regulatory sequences from tyrosine hydroxylase

    Journal of Neurobiology 54:618–627.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.10185

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Gandhi AV
    2. Mosser EA
    3. Oikonomou G
    4. Prober DA

    (2015) Melatonin is required for the circadian regulation of sleep

    Neuron 85:1193–1199.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.016

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Ganguly-Fitzgerald I
    2. Donlea J
    3. Shaw PJ

    (2006) Waking experience affects sleep need in Drosophila

    Science 313:1775–1781.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130408

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Gerstner JR
    2. Perron IJ
    3. Riedy SM
    4. Yoshikawa T
    5. Kadotani H
    6. Owada Y
    7. Van Dongen HPA
    8. Galante RJ
    9. Dickinson K
    10. Yin JCP
    11. Pack AI
    12. Frank MG

    (2017) Normal sleep requires the astrocyte brain-type fatty acid binding protein FABP7

    Science Advances 3:e1602663.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602663

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Gilestro GF
    2. Cirelli C

    (2009) pySolo: a complete suite for sleep analysis in Drosophila

    Bioinformatics 25:1466–1467.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp237

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Halassa MM
    2. Fellin T
    3. Haydon PG

    (2007) The tripartite synapse: roles for gliotransmission in health and disease

    Trends in Molecular Medicine 13:54–63.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2006.12.005

    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Haydon PG

    (2017) Astrocytes and the modulation of sleep

    Current Opinion in Neurobiology 44:28–33.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2017.02.008

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Hendricks JC
    2. Finn SM
    3. Panckeri KA
    4. Chavkin J
    5. Williams JA
    6. Sehgal A
    7. Pack AI

    (2000) Rest in Drosophila is a sleep-like state

    Neuron 25:129–138.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80877-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Hintermann E
    2. Jenö P
    3. Meyer UA

    (1995) Isolation and characterization of an arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase from Drosophila melanogaster

    FEBS Letters 375:148–150.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(95)01198-n

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Hintermann E
    2. Grieder NC
    3. Amherd R
    4. Brodbeck D
    5. Meyer UA

    (1996) Cloning of an arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase (aaNAT1) from Drosophila melanogaster expressed in the nervous system and the gut

    PNAS 93:12315–12320.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.22.12315

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Huang C
    2. Wu J
    3. Liao R
    4. Zhang W

    (2012) SKF83959, an agonist of phosphatidylinositol-linked D(1)-like receptors, promotes ERK1/2 activation and cell migration in cultured rat astrocytes

    PLOS ONE 7:e49954.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049954

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Inazu M
    2. Takeda H
    3. Matsumiya T

    (2003) Functional expression of the norepinephrine transporter in cultured rat astrocytes

    Journal of Neurochemistry 84:136–144.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01514.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Kume K
    2. Kume S
    3. Park SK
    4. Hirsh J
    5. Jackson FR

    (2005) Dopamine is a regulator of arousal in the fruit fly

    Journal of Neuroscience 25:7377–7384.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2048-05.2005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Liu S
    2. Liu Q
    3. Tabuchi M
    4. Wu MN

    (2016) Sleep drive is encoded by neural plastic changes in a dedicated circuit

    Cell 165:1347–1360.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.013

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Ma Z
    2. Stork T
    3. Bergles DE
    4. Freeman MR

    (2016) Neuromodulators signal through astrocytes to alter neural circuit activity and behaviour

    Nature 539:428–432.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20145

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Maranda B
    2. Hodgetts R

    (1977) A characterization of dopamine acetyltransferase in Drosophila melanogaster

    Insect Biochemistry 7:33–43.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1790(77)90054-3

    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Martin CA
    2. Krantz DE

    (2014) Drosophila melanogaster as a genetic model system to study neurotransmitter transporters

    Neurochemistry International 73:71–88.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2014.03.015

    • Google Scholar
33. 1. McGuire SE
    2. Mao Z
    3. Davis RL

    (2004) Spatiotemporal gene expression targeting with the TARGET and Gene-Switch systems in Drosophila

    Science's STKE 6:pl6.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/stke.2202004pl6

    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Monastirioti M
    2. Gorczyca M
    3. Rapus J
    4. Eckert M
    5. White K
    6. Budnik V

    (1995) Octopamine immunoreactivity in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster

    The Journal of Comparative Neurology 356:275–287.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903560210

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Nall A
    2. Sehgal A

    (2014) Monoamines and sleep in Drosophila

    Behavioral Neuroscience 128:264–272.

    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036209

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Nern A
    2. Pfeiffer BD
    3. Rubin GM

    (2015) Optimized tools for multicolor stochastic labeling reveal diverse stereotyped cell arrangements in the fly visual system

    PNAS 112:E2967–E2976.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1506763112

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Parinejad N
    2. Peco E
    3. Ferreira T
    4. Stacey SM
    5. van Meyel DJ

    (2016) Disruption of an EAAT-Mediated chloride channel in a Drosophila Model of Ataxia

    Journal of Neuroscience 36:7640–7647.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0197-16.2016

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Pelluru D
    2. Konadhode RR
    3. Bhat NR
    4. Shiromani PJ

    (2016) Optogenetic stimulation of astrocytes in the posterior hypothalamus increases sleep at night in C57BL/6J mice

    European Journal of Neuroscience 43:1298–1306.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13074

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Pelton EW
    2. Kimelberg HK
    3. Shipherd SV
    4. Bourke RS

    (1981) Dopamine and norepinephrine uptake and metabolism by astroglial cells in culture

    Life Sciences 28:1655–1663.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(81)90322-2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Petrelli F
    2. Dallérac G
    3. Pucci L
    4. Calì C
    5. Zehnder T
    6. Sultan S
    7. Lecca S
    8. Chicca A
    9. Ivanov A
    10. Asensio CS
    11. Gundersen V
    12. Toni N
    13. Knott GW
    14. Magara F
    15. Gertsch J
    16. Kirchhoff F
    17. Déglon N
    18. Giros B
    19. Edwards RH
    20. Mothet JP
    21. Bezzi P

    (2020) Dysfunction of homeostatic control of dopamine by astrocytes in the developing prefrontal cortex leads to cognitive impairments

    Molecular Psychiatry 25:732–749.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0226-y

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Pfeiffer BD
    2. Ngo TT
    3. Hibbard KL
    4. Murphy C
    5. Jenett A
    6. Truman JW
    7. Rubin GM

    (2010) Refinement of tools for targeted gene expression in Drosophila

    Genetics 186:735–755.

    https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.110.119917

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Pimentel D
    2. Donlea JM
    3. Talbot CB
    4. Song SM
    5. Thurston AJF
    6. Miesenböck G

    (2016) Operation of a homeostatic sleep switch

    Nature 536:333–337.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19055

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Qian Y
    2. Cao Y
    3. Deng B
    4. Yang G
    5. Li J
    6. Xu R
    7. Zhang D
    8. Huang J
    9. Rao Y

    (2017) Sleep homeostasis regulated by 5ht2b receptor in a small subset of neurons in the dorsal fan-shaped body of Drosophila

    eLife 6:e26519.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26519

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Sandén N
    2. Thorlin T
    3. Blomstrand F
    4. Persson PA
    5. Hansson E

    (2000) 5-Hydroxytryptamine2B receptors stimulate Ca2+ increases in cultured astrocytes from three different brain regions

    Neurochemistry International 36:427–434.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-0186(99)00134-5

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Seidner G
    2. Robinson JE
    3. Wu M
    4. Worden K
    5. Masek P
    6. Roberts SW
    7. Keene AC
    8. Joiner WJ

    (2015) Identification of neurons with a privileged role in sleep homeostasis in Drosophila melanogaster

    Current Biology 25:2928–2938.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Seugnet L
    2. Suzuki Y
    3. Merlin G
    4. Gottschalk L
    5. Duntley SP
    6. Shaw PJ

    (2011) Notch signaling modulates sleep homeostasis and learning after sleep deprivation in Drosophila

    Current Biology 21:835–840.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Shao L
    2. Shuai Y
    3. Wang J
    4. Feng S
    5. Lu B
    6. Li Z
    7. Zhao Y
    8. Wang L
    9. Zhong Y

    (2011) Schizophrenia susceptibility gene dysbindin regulates glutamatergic and dopaminergic functions via distinctive mechanisms in Drosophila

    PNAS 108:18831–18836.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114569108

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Shaw PJ
    2. Cirelli C
    3. Greenspan RJ
    4. Tononi G

    (2000) Correlates of sleep and waking in Drosophila melanogaster

    Science 287:1834–1837.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5459.1834

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Spana EP
    2. Abrams AB
    3. Ellis KT
    4. Klein JC
    5. Ruderman BT
    6. Shi AH
    7. Zhu D
    8. Stewart A
    9. May S

    (2020) Speck , First Identified in Drosophila melanogaster in 1910, Is Encoded by the Arylalkalamine N-Acetyltransferase (AANAT1) Gene

    G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 10:3387–3398.

    https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.120.401470

    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Stahl BA
    2. Peco E
    3. Davla S
    4. Murakami K
    5. Caicedo Moreno NA
    6. van Meyel DJ
    7. Keene AC

    (2018) The taurine transporter Eaat2 functions in ensheathing Glia to modulate sleep and metabolic rate

    Current Biology 28:3700–3708.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.10.039

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Suh J
    2. Jackson FR

    (2007) Drosophila ebony activity is required in Glia for the circadian regulation of locomotor activity

    Neuron 55:435–447.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.038

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Takeda H
    2. Inazu M
    3. Matsumiya T

    (2002) Astroglial dopamine transport is mediated by norepinephrine transporter

    Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology 366:620–623.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-002-0640-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Vaarmann A
    2. Gandhi S
    3. Abramov AY

    (2010) Dopamine induces Ca2+ signaling in astrocytes through reactive oxygen species generated by monoamine oxidase

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 285:25018–25023.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.111450

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Vanderheyden WM
    2. Goodman AG
    3. Taylor RH
    4. Frank MG
    5. Van Dongen HPA
    6. Gerstner JR

    (2018) Astrocyte expression of the Drosophila TNF-alpha homologue, eiger, regulates sleep in flies

    PLOS Genetics 14:e1007724.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007724

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Vanderheyden W
    2. Van Dongen HP
    3. Frank M
    4. Gerstner J

    (2019) Sleep pressure regulates mushroom body neural-glial interactions in Drosophila

    Matters Select 2019:8.

    https://doi.org/10.19185/matters.201903000008

    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Walkowicz L
    2. Kijak E
    3. Krzeptowski W
    4. Górska-Andrzejak J
    5. Stratoulias V
    6. Woznicka O
    7. Chwastek E
    8. Heino TI
    9. Pyza EM

    (2017) Downregulation of DmMANF in glial cells results in neurodegeneration and affects sleep and lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster

    Frontiers in Neuroscience 11:610.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00610

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Wu MN
    2. Koh K
    3. Yue Z
    4. Joiner WJ
    5. Sehgal A

    (2008) A genetic screen for sleep and circadian mutants reveals mechanisms underlying regulation of sleep in Drosophila

    Sleep 31:465–472.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/31.4.465

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Yuan Q
    2. Lin F
    3. Zheng X
    4. Sehgal A

    (2005) Serotonin modulates circadian entrainment in Drosophila

    Neuron 47:115–127.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.05.027

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Sejal Davla

   1. Centre for Research in Neuroscience, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
   2. BRaIN Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
   3. Integrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing

   Contributed equally with

   Gregory Artiushin

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3201-1970

2. Gregory Artiushin

   Neuroscience Graduate Group, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing

   Contributed equally with

   Sejal Davla

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Yongjun Li

   Biology Graduate Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Daryan Chitsaz

   1. Centre for Research in Neuroscience, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
   2. Integrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Sally Li

   Centre for Research in Neuroscience, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

6. Amita Sehgal

   Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chronobiology and Sleep Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   Reviewing editor, eLife

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7354-9641

7. Donald J van Meyel

   1. Centre for Research in Neuroscience, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
   2. BRaIN Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing

   For correspondence

   don.vanmeyel@mcgill.ca

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6075-8599

• 2,168

  views

• 421

  downloads

• 25

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.