The nuclear envelope partitions nuclear components from the cytoskeleton, thereby necessitating their mechanical coupling across the nuclear envelope to enable cytoskeletal function in the structure and positioning of nuclear contents. This is achieved by the Linker of Nucleoskeleton and Cytoskeleton (LINC) complex, which traverses the nuclear envelope and binds to cytoskeletal and nuclear structures to mediate force transduction between these partitioned components (Haque et al., 2006; Crisp et al., 2006; Lee and Burke, 2018; Meinke and Schirmer, 2015; Figure 1a). In this capacity, the LINC complex is essential for cellular life, performing critical functions in nuclear structure, shape, and positioning (Alam et al., 2015; Luxton et al., 2010; Crisp et al., 2006), in addition to tissue-specific functions including sound perception in the inner ear and chromosome movements during meiosis (Horn et al., 2013a; Roux et al., 2009; Horn et al., 2013b; Lee et al., 2015). Further, mutations of the LINC complex and its interacting partners are associated with human laminopathies, including Hutchison-Gilford progeria syndrome and Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy (Meinke et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2012; Taranum et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2018b; Chang et al., 2019).

Figure 1 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

The LINC complex is formed of SUN (Sad1 and UNC84 homology) domain and KASH (Klarsicht, ANC-1, and Syne homology) domain proteins (Padmakumar et al., 2005; Haque et al., 2006; Crisp et al., 2006), which interact immediately below the outer nuclear membrane, through complex formation between their C-terminal eponymous SUN and KASH domains (Sosa et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2012). SUN proteins then traverse the approximately 50 nm peri-nuclear space and cross the inner nuclear membrane, enabling their N-termini to bind to nuclear contents, including reported interactions with the nuclear lamina (Crisp et al., 2006; Haque et al., 2006; Haque et al., 2010), chromatin (Chi et al., 2007), and the telomeric ends of meiotic chromosomes (Shibuya et al., 2014). Similarly, KASH domain proteins cross the outer nuclear membrane and have large cytoplasmic extensions to enable their N-termini to bind to the cytoskeleton (Spindler et al., 2019; Starr and Fridolfsson, 2010). Thus, the LINC complex axis is established by a peri-nuclear SUN-KASH core interaction and mechanically couples the cytoskeleton and nuclear contents (Figure 1a).

In mammals, there are five SUN proteins, of which SUN1 and SUN2 are widely expressed and perform partially redundant functions (Lei et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2009). There are similarly multiple KASH proteins, four of which are Nesprins (Nuclear Envelope Spectrin Repeat proteins). Nesprin-1 and Nesprin-2 are widely expressed, perform overlapping functions and contain large cytoplasmic spectrin-repeat domains with N-termini that bind to actin (Banerjee et al., 2014; Sakamoto et al., 2017; Zhou et al., 2018a). Nesprin-3 shares a similar KASH domain but its cytoplasmic region binds to plectin, mediating interactions with intermediate filaments (Wilhelmsen et al., 2005). The two most divergent KASH proteins, Nesprin-4 and KASH5, exhibit substantial sequence diversity within their KASH domains (Figure 1b). Nesprin-4 functions in the outer hair cells of the inner ear and is essential for hearing (Horn et al., 2013a). Its N-terminus interacts with kinesin, which mediates microtubule binding and plus-end directed movements that achieve the basal positioning of nuclei (Horn et al., 2013a; Roux et al., 2009). KASH5 functions in meiosis and is essential for fertility (Horn et al., 2013b; Morimoto et al., 2012). Its N-terminus interacts with dynein-dynactin (Morimoto et al., 2012; Horn et al., 2013b), which mediates microtubule binding and minus-end directed motility that drives rapid chromosomal movements to facilitate homologous chromosome pairing (Lee et al., 2015; Zetka et al., 2020). Thus, KASH proteins execute a range of LINC complex functions in transmitting actin forces, plus-/minus-end directed microtubule movements and the tensile strength of intermediate filaments into the nucleus.

The canonical model of the LINC complex is based on crystal structures of the SUN-KASH domain complexes formed between SUN2 and Nesprin-1/2 (Sosa et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012). The SUN domain adopts a ‘three-leaf clover’-like structure, in which a globular trimer extends from a short N-terminal trimeric coiled-coil (Sosa et al., 2013). KASH domains are intertwined between SUN protomers and their path is defined by three distinct regions. The KASH C-terminus contains a triple proline motif that packs between the globular cores of SUN protomers. The KASH mid-region winds around the trimeric arc and is wedged between the globular core of one SUN protomer and a β-turn-β loop, known as the KASH-lid, of the adjacent protomer. The KASH N-terminus then turns by >90° to radiate out from the trimer axis and forms a disulphide bond with a SUN protomer (between SUN2 and KASH1 amino acids C563 and C8774, respectively), which is predicted to enhance the tensile strength of SUN-KASH (Jahed et al., 2015; Sosa et al., 2012). The extensive 3:3 complex of three KASH domains bound to a single SUN trimer was interpreted as the biological unit of the crystal lattice (Sosa et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012). On this basis, it was proposed that the LINC complex consists of a SUN-KASH 3:3 complex that is orientated vertically to allow KASH proteins to cross the outer nuclear membrane and SUN to form an extended trimeric coiled-coil that spans the peri-nuclear space (Sosa et al., 2012; Sosa et al., 2013; Figure 1a). In support of this model, the luminal region of SUN2 was shown to be trimeric in vitro by analytical ultracentrifugation, SEC-MALS, and gel filtration (Sosa et al., 2012; Nie et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2012; Jahed et al., 2018b) and upon targeting to the nuclear envelope in vivo, the luminal regions of SUN2 and SUN1 were shown to form trimers and larger structures by fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy (Hennen et al., 2017; Hennen et al., 2018). However, the stoichiometry of SUN-KASH complexes has not yet been tested in solution. Further, whilst it has been widely recognised that branching or higher order assembly of LINC complexes may be advantageous in distributing large forces and achieving coordinated motions (Zhou et al., 2012; Lu et al., 2008; Jahed et al., 2018a; Wang et al., 2012; Sosa et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2012), we have hitherto lacked structural evidence and a molecular basis for higher order assembly of the LINC complex.

Here, we provide crystallographic and biophysical evidence in support of the LINC complex forming a branched network. We find that SUN-KASH complexes between SUN proteins and Nesprin-4, KASH5 and Nesprin-1 are 6:6 structures formed of constitutive interactions between two 3:3 complexes. The three distinct KASH domains provide structurally diverse but related 6:6 interfaces that achieve the same topology with potential hinge-like motion between SUN trimers. The SUN-KASH 6:6 interface consists of a ‘head-to-head’ interaction between SUN’s trimeric C-terminal ‘heads’, thereby providing a mechanistic basis for formation of a branched LINC complex network. Thus, we propose that SUN-KASH domain complexes act as nodes for branching and integration between LINC complexes to achieve the coordinated transduction of large forces across the nuclear envelope.

How does our finding of a constitutive SUN-KASH 6:6 assembly integrate with previous biochemical studies of the LINC complex? It was previously shown by analytical ultracentrifugation, SEC-MALS, and gel filtration that luminal SUN2 is trimeric, and its isolated SUN domain is a trimer or monomer, depending on biochemical conditions (Zhou et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012; Sosa et al., 2013; Jahed et al., 2018b). These findings agree with our observations that the isolated SUN domain of SUN1 becomes monomeric upon cleavage of its N-terminal GCN4 expression tag (which mimics the trimeric luminal coiled-coil), so is entirely dependent on KASH-binding to stabilise its trimeric structure and head-to-head assembly. The only previous analysis of SUN-KASH in solution involved demonstrating complex formation by analytical gel filtration, without means for oligomer determination (Esra Demircioglu et al., 2016). Thus, the 3:3 SUN-KASH model was the natural conclusion of combining SUN’s luminal trimer with the extensive 3:3 complexes within SUN2-KASH1/2 crystal lattices (Sosa et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012). Our SEC-MALS and SEC-SAXS analyses provide the first reported evidence of solution structure, revealing that SUN-KASH complexes formed by SUN1 and SUN2 are 6:6 hetero-oligomers in which 3:3 structures are locked in head-to-head interactions, as observed in our SUN1-KASH crystal structures and in previous SUN2-KASH crystal lattices (Sosa et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012). Further, mutational analysis confirmed that SUN1/2-KASH1 complexes depend on interactions across the 6:6 interface for their stability. Hence, our conclusion that SUN-KASH complexes are 6:6 hetero-oligomers in vitro is consistent with all existing crystallographic, biochemical, and biophysical data.

How does the SUN-KASH 6:6 assembly relate to previous observations of LINC complex structure and function within the cell? The oligomeric states of luminal regions of SUN1 and SUN2, upon expression and targeting to the nuclear envelope, were determined by fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy as trimers with additional higher order SUN1 structures (Hennen et al., 2017; Hennen et al., 2018). In these studies, expressed KASH domains and isolated SUN domains remained mostly monomeric, suggesting that expressed constructs did not form SUN-KASH complexes with endogenous partners. Hence, these studies provided important evidence that the coiled-coils of SUN’s luminal regions form trimers and larger oligomers but did not determine the stoichiometry of SUN-KASH complexes. The assembly of higher order LINC structures has also been suggested by numerous other cellular findings, including immobility within the nuclear envelope (Lu et al., 2008), foci formation within the meiotic nuclear envelope (Ding et al., 2007; Morimoto et al., 2012; Horn et al., 2013b), and the formation of transmembrane actin-associated nuclear (TAN) lines (Luxton et al., 2010). Our model of LINC complex branching by SUN-KASH 6:6 assembly is consistent with the observed oligomeric state of SUN’s luminal region and higher order LINC assembly, but its molecular details are not directly tested by any existing cellular data. Thus, our molecular model of a branched LINC complex, and similarly the role of zinc-binding in the SUN1-KASH4 complex, must be tested in future studies of the consequence of separation of function mutations (such as targeting the 6:6 interfaces of SUN1/2-KASH1 complexes by I673E and I579E mutations) on the cellular structure and function of the LINC complex.

The advantages of a branched LINC complex network include its ability to transmit large forces, being impervious to the breakage of individual linkages, and in mediating communication and coordination between adjacent molecules. The SUN-KASH 6:6 assembly provides an attractive structural means for branching, which may combine with a series of episodic instances of oligomer variation along the SUN-KASH axis to generate a highly branched LINC complex network. Firstly, oligomer variation could occur through higher order assembly of SUN-KASH 6:6 complexes, as indicated by our observation of higher order SUN2-KASH structures and the formation of SUN1-KASH4 12:12 complexes upon disruption of zinc-binding. Secondly, oligomeric variation within SUN’s luminal regions may mediate branching, such as indicated by the formation of trimers and larger oligomer by luminal SUN1 (Hennen et al., 2018) and disulphide bond formation by SUN1 amino acid C526 (Lu et al., 2008). Finally, oligomer variation between SUN and KASH proteins could mediate branching across the outer nuclear membrane. Indeed, KASH5 is dimeric (Gurusaran and Davies, unpublished findings), raising the question of how SUN trimers and KASH dimers are organised into discrete 6:6 complexes? We suggest that each KASH dimer likely spans both SUN trimers, thereby establishing a symmetrical array of SUN1-KASH interfaces within each 6:6 structure, which constitute branching events between SUN-KASH5 6:6 complexes and their dimeric cytoskeletal attachments. Thus, we propose that coordinated force transduction is achieved by a highly branched LINC complex network in which SUN-KASH 6:6 hetero-oligomers contribute to branching by mediating force distribution and integration between three KASH dimers and two SUN trimers (Figure 8).

The head-to-head nature of SUN-KASH 6:6 complexes suggests their orientation parallel to the outer nuclear membrane, with SUN trimers organised obliquely within the peri-nuclear space (Figure 8). Our SAXS analysis of SUN1-KASH1 indicated that it adopts a hinged conformation in solution, stabilised by two KASH-lid tip-to-tip interactions and laterally associated central KASH-lids. Whilst hinged motions were not required to explain SAXS data of SUN1-KASH4/5, normal mode analysis predicted that hinged structures of up to approximately 60° angulation are conformationally accessible states for all three SUN1-KASH complexes. Thus, we suggest that all SUN-KASH head-to-head structures can undergo hinge-like motion at their 6:6 interface, with a large proportion of highly angled conformations accounting for their dominance in the SAXS data of SUN1-KASH1 but not other complexes. This hinge-like motion would result in SUN-KASH complexes becoming angled in response to the magnitude and direction of tension forces carried by SUN and KASH molecules, whilst providing the conformational flexibility necessary for constituent KASH proteins to adopt orientations that allow upstream transmembrane sequences to cross the outer nuclear membrane. Further, all three SUN-KASH 6:6 interfaces are largely hydrophobic, so could be stabilised by interactions with phospholipids, possibly as part of integrated membrane-bound complexes that include KASH’s transmembrane regions. Thus, hinge-like flexibility of SUN-KASH may result in a diverse range of angled conformations owing to distinct tension forces, steric constraints and membrane structures of particular spatiotemporal environments.

What are the roles of distinct SUN and KASH proteins in LINC complex structure and function? Whilst SUN1 and SUN2 form similar 6:6 hetero-oligomers, we observed notable differences in the stability and higher assembly of their SUN-KASH complexes. The reduced stability of SUN2-KASH complexes could facilitate a faster turnover of SUN2-containing LINC complexes, whilst higher order assembly of SUN2-KASH may combine with differential SUN1/2 luminal assemblies (Hennen et al., 2017; Hennen et al., 2018) to achieve distinct LINC complex architectures. These findings may underlie some of the observed asymmetries between SUN1 and SUN2 LINC complexes, such as their differential preference for cytoskeletal components and their non-redundant functions (Link et al., 2014; Zhu et al., 2017; Thakar et al., 2017; May and Carroll, 2018). It is important to note that SUN2-KASH4, in which the 6:6 interface is mediated solely by KASH4 zinc sites, is the only SUN2 complex that retains the high affinity observed for SUN1 complexes. In contrast, SUN amino acids contribute to the 6:6 interfaces of KASH1/5 complexes, explaining how SUN protein sequence diversity can account for the substantially reduced affinity of SUN2-KASH1/5 in comparison with their SUN1 complexes. The variation of KASH proteins seemingly provides even greater functional diversity given their entirely non-redundant roles. An intriguing observation is that Nesprin-4 and KASH5, which transduce microtubule forces (Horn et al., 2013a; Roux et al., 2009; Morimoto et al., 2012; Horn et al., 2013b), demonstrate extensive interactions at their 6:6 interfaces. In contrast, a far less extensive 6:6 interface is found in classical Nesprins, which transduce actin forces and the tensile strength of intermediate filaments (Banerjee et al., 2014; Starr and Fridolfsson, 2010; Ketema and Sonnenberg, 2011). Thus, cytoskeletal components may have differential requirements for the strength, structure and stability of SUN-KASH 6:6 hetero-oligomers. Further, differences in regulatory mechanisms, such as zinc-binding in SUN1-KASH4 assembly, may contribute towards specialisation. The expression levels and relative availability of SUN and KASH proteins will determine their incorporation into LINC complexes, and specialised functionalities may be achieved by combining distinct isoforms within the same LINC complex network or within separate networks of the same cell.

How is LINC complex assembly regulated within the cell? An intriguing finding is that SUN proteins undergo autoinhibition, in which SUN domains become bound by upstream sequences in monomeric conformations that are incapable of binding to KASH domains (Nie et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2018; Jahed et al., 2018b; Jahed et al., 2018a). These autoinhibitory conformations likely represent unassembled states that may be crucial intermediates in the dynamic process of LINC complex expression, localisation, and assembly within the cell. They may also represent a ‘storage form’ of SUN proteins that form when quantities of available KASH proteins are limiting. This would establish discrete pools of assembled and unassembled SUN proteins, which could play an important role in preventing unbound SUN molecules from weakening established LINC structures by continually competing for KASH-binding. Further, given the myriad of LINC complex functions in almost all eukaryotic cells (Lee and Burke, 2018; Meinke and Schirmer, 2015; Starr and Fridolfsson, 2010), assembly is likely directed along specific pathways to achieve distinct LINC complex structures for the fulfilment of specialised functions. Thus, regulatory processes must overcome autoinhibition, enable KASH-binding, and direct LINC assembly in a timely manner. These may involve chaperones, enzymatic modification, protein interactions, and/or chemical conditions of the nuclear envelope environment. In specific, these may include regulation by luminal ion concentration and pH (Jahed et al., 2018b), local regulation of SUN-KASH angulation, control of SUN1-KASH4 assembly by zinc availability, and determining the nature of LINC complexes through relative availability of SUN and KASH protein isoforms. We have hitherto considered variations within SUN-KASH 6:6 complexes, but also recognise the potential for regulatory mechanisms of the nuclear envelope to induce more substantial structural changes. Thus, whilst our model of LINC complex branching through SUN-KASH 6:6 assembly is consistent with all existing data, it remains possible that alternative LINC complex conformations may form within the spatial and temporal contexts of disparate cell types.

Crystallographic structure factors and atomic coordinates have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) under accession numbers 6R15, 6R16 and 6R2I, and raw diffraction data have been uploaded to https://proteindiffraction.org/. SEC-SAXS data have been deposited in the Small Angle Scattering Biological Data Bank (https://www.sasbdb.org/) under accession numbers SASDJC5, SASDJD5, SASDJE5 and SASDJF5. Uncropped gel images relating to Figures 4b and 5a are available in source data files.

1. 1. Gurusaran M
   2. Davies OR

   (2020) RCSB Protein Data Bank

   ID 6R15. Crystal structure of the SUN1-KASH1 6:6 complex.

   https://www.rcsb.org/structure/6R15
2. 1. Gurusaran M
   2. Davies OR

   (2020) RCSB Protein Data Bank

   ID 6R16. Crystal structure of the SUN1-KASH4 6:6 complex.

   https://www.rcsb.org/structure/6R16
3. 1. Gurusaran M
   2. Davies OR

   (2020) RCSB Protein Data Bank

   ID 6R2I. Crystal structure of the SUN1-KASH5 6:6 complex.

   https://www.rcsb.org/structure/6R2I
4. 1. Gurusaran M
   2. Davies OR

   (2020) Small Angle Scattering Biological Data Bank

   ID SASDJC5. LINC complex between the SUN domain of SUN1 and KASH domain of Nesprin-4 - SUN1-KASH4 6:6 complex.

   https://www.sasbdb.org/data/SASDJC5/
5. 1. Gurusaran M
   2. Davies OR

   (2020) Small Angle Scattering Biological Data Bank

   ID SASDJD5. LINC complex between the SUN domain of SUN1 and KASH domain of KASH5 - SUN1-KASH5 6:6 complex.

   https://www.sasbdb.org/data/SASDJD5/
6. 1. Gurusaran M
   2. Davies OR

   (2020) Small Angle Scattering Biological Data Bank

   ID SASDJE5. LINC complex between the SUN domain of SUN1 and KASH domain of Nesprin-1 - SUN1-KASH1 6:6 complex.

   https://www.sasbdb.org/data/SASDJE5/
7. 1. Gurusaran M
   2. Davies OR

   (2020) Small Angle Scattering Biological Data Bank

   ID SASDJF5. SUN domain of SUN1 harbouring mutation I673E - monomer.

   https://www.sasbdb.org/data/SASDJF5/

1. 1. Adams PD
   2. Afonine PV
   3. Bunkóczi G
   4. Chen VB
   5. Davis IW
   6. Echols N
   7. Headd JJ
   8. Hung LW
   9. Kapral GJ
   10. Grosse-Kunstleve RW
   11. McCoy AJ
   12. Moriarty NW
   13. Oeffner R
   14. Read RJ
   15. Richardson DC
   16. Richardson JS
   17. Terwilliger TC
   18. Zwart PH

   (2010) PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution

   Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography 66:213–221.

   https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444909052925

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Alam SG
   2. Lovett D
   3. Kim DI
   4. Roux KJ
   5. Dickinson RB
   6. Lele TP

   (2015) The nucleus is an intracellular propagator of tensile forces in NIH 3t3 fibroblasts

   Journal of Cell Science 128:1901–1911.

   https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.161703

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Banerjee I
   2. Zhang J
   3. Moore-Morris T
   4. Pfeiffer E
   5. Buchholz KS
   6. Liu A
   7. Ouyang K
   8. Stroud MJ
   9. Gerace L
   10. Evans SM
   11. McCulloch A
   12. Chen J

   (2014) Targeted ablation of nesprin 1 and nesprin 2 from murine myocardium results in cardiomyopathy, altered nuclear morphology and inhibition of the biomechanical gene response

   PLOS Genetics 10:e1004114.

   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004114

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Chang W
   2. Wang Y
   3. Luxton GWG
   4. Östlund C
   5. Worman HJ
   6. Gundersen GG

   (2019) Imbalanced nucleocytoskeletal connections create common polarity defects in progeria and physiological aging

   PNAS 116:3578–3583.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1809683116

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Chen VB
   2. Arendall WB
   3. Headd JJ
   4. Keedy DA
   5. Immormino RM
   6. Kapral GJ
   7. Murray LW
   8. Richardson JS
   9. Richardson DC

   (2010) MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography

   Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography 66:12–21.

   https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444909042073

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Chen CY
   2. Chi YH
   3. Mutalif RA
   4. Starost MF
   5. Myers TG
   6. Anderson SA
   7. Stewart CL
   8. Jeang KT

   (2012) Accumulation of the inner nuclear envelope protein Sun1 is pathogenic in Progeric and dystrophic laminopathies

   Cell 149:565–577.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.059

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Chi Y-H
   2. Haller K
   3. Peloponese J-M
   4. Jeang K-T

   (2007) Histone acetyltransferase hALP and nuclear membrane protein hsSUN1 function in De-condensation of mitotic chromosomes

   Journal of Biological Chemistry 282:27447–27458.

   https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M703098200

   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Crisp M
   2. Liu Q
   3. Roux K
   4. Rattner JB
   5. Shanahan C
   6. Burke B
   7. Stahl PD
   8. Hodzic D

   (2006) Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: role of the LINC complex

   Journal of Cell Biology 172:41–53.

   https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200509124

   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Diederichs K
   2. McSweeney S
   3. Ravelli RB

   (2003) Zero-dose extrapolation as part of macromolecular synchrotron data reduction

   Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography 59:903–909.

   https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444903006516

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Ding X
    2. Xu R
    3. Yu J
    4. Xu T
    5. Zhuang Y
    6. Han M

    (2007) SUN1 is required for telomere attachment to nuclear envelope and gametogenesis in mice

    Developmental Cell 12:863–872.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.03.018

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Emsley P
    2. Lohkamp B
    3. Scott WG
    4. Cowtan K

    (2010) Features and development of coot

    Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography 66:486–501.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444910007493

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Esra Demircioglu F
    2. Cruz VE
    3. Schwartz TU

    (2016) Purification and structural analysis of SUN and KASH domain proteins

    Methods in Enzymology 569:63–78.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mie.2015.08.011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Evans PR

    (2011) An introduction to data reduction: space-group determination, scaling and intensity statistics

    Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography 67:282–292.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S090744491003982X

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Franke D
    2. Svergun DI

    (2009) DAMMIF, a program for rapid ab-initio shape determination in small-angle scattering

    Journal of Applied Crystallography 42:342–346.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889809000338

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Haque F
    2. Lloyd DJ
    3. Smallwood DT
    4. Dent CL
    5. Shanahan CM
    6. Fry AM
    7. Trembath RC
    8. Shackleton S

    (2006) SUN1 interacts with nuclear lamin A and cytoplasmic nesprins to provide a physical connection between the nuclear Lamina and the cytoskeleton

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 26:3738–3751.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.26.10.3738-3751.2006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Haque F
    2. Mazzeo D
    3. Patel JT
    4. Smallwood DT
    5. Ellis JA
    6. Shanahan CM
    7. Shackleton S

    (2010) Mammalian SUN protein interaction networks at the inner nuclear membrane and their role in laminopathy disease processes

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 285:3487–3498.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.071910

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Hennen J
    2. Hur KH
    3. Saunders CA
    4. Luxton GWG
    5. Mueller JD

    (2017) Quantitative brightness analysis of protein oligomerization in the nuclear envelope

    Biophysical Journal 113:138–147.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2017.05.044

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Hennen J
    2. Saunders CA
    3. Mueller JD
    4. Luxton GWG

    (2018) Fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy reveals differential SUN protein oligomerization in living cells

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 29:1003–1011.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E17-04-0233

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Hoffmann A
    2. Grudinin S

    (2017) NOLB: nonlinear rigid block Normal-Mode analysis method

    Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 13:2123–2134.

    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00197

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Horn HF
    2. Brownstein Z
    3. Lenz DR
    4. Shivatzki S
    5. Dror AA
    6. Dagan-Rosenfeld O
    7. Friedman LM
    8. Roux KJ
    9. Kozlov S
    10. Jeang KT
    11. Frydman M
    12. Burke B
    13. Stewart CL
    14. Avraham KB

    (2013a) The LINC complex is essential for hearing

    Journal of Clinical Investigation 123:740–750.

    https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI66911

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Horn HF
    2. Kim DI
    3. Wright GD
    4. Wong ESM
    5. Stewart CL
    6. Burke B
    7. Roux KJ

    (2013b) A mammalian KASH domain protein coupling meiotic chromosomes to the cytoskeleton

    Journal of Cell Biology 202:1023–1039.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201304004

    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Jahed Z
    2. Shams H
    3. Mofrad MR

    (2015) A disulfide bond is required for the transmission of forces through SUN-KASH complexes

    Biophysical Journal 109:501–509.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2015.06.057

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Jahed Z
    2. Fadavi D
    3. Vu UT
    4. Asgari E
    5. Luxton GWG
    6. Mofrad MRK

    (2018a) Molecular insights into the mechanisms of SUN1 oligomerization in the nuclear envelope

    Biophysical Journal 114:1190–1203.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2018.01.015

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Jahed Z
    2. Vu UT
    3. Fadavi D
    4. Ke H
    5. Rathish A
    6. Kim SCJ
    7. Feng W
    8. Mofrad MRK

    (2018b) A molecular model for LINC complex regulation: activation of SUN2 for KASH binding

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 29:2012–2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E18-04-0266

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Kabsch W

    (2010) XDS

    Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography 66:125–132.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444909047337

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Ketema M
    2. Sonnenberg A

    (2011) Nesprin-3: a versatile connector between the nucleus and the cytoskeleton

    Biochemical Society Transactions 39:1719–1724.

    https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20110669

    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Konarev PV
    2. Volkov VV
    3. Sokolova AV
    4. Koch MHJ
    5. Svergun DI

    (2003) PRIMUS : a Windows PC-based system for small-angle scattering data analysis

    Journal of Applied Crystallography 36:1277–1282.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889803012779

    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Kumar KSD
    2. Gurusaran M
    3. Satheesh SN
    4. Radha P
    5. Pavithra S
    6. Thulaa Tharshan KPS
    7. Helliwell JR
    8. Sekar K

    (2015) Online_DPI : a web server to calculate the diffraction precision index for a protein structure

    Journal of Applied Crystallography 48:939–942.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576715006287

    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Lee CY
    2. Horn HF
    3. Stewart CL
    4. Burke B
    5. Bolcun-Filas E
    6. Schimenti JC
    7. Dresser ME
    8. Pezza RJ

    (2015) Mechanism and regulation of rapid telomere prophase movements in mouse meiotic chromosomes

    Cell Reports 11:551–563.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.045

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Lee YL
    2. Burke B

    (2018) LINC complexes and nuclear positioning

    Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 82:67–76.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.11.008

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Lei K
    2. Zhang X
    3. Ding X
    4. Guo X
    5. Chen M
    6. Zhu B
    7. Xu T
    8. Zhuang Y
    9. Xu R
    10. Han M

    (2009) SUN1 and SUN2 play critical but partially redundant roles in anchoring nuclei in skeletal muscle cells in mice

    PNAS 106:10207–10212.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812037106

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Link J
    2. Leubner M
    3. Schmitt J
    4. Göb E
    5. Benavente R
    6. Jeang KT
    7. Xu R
    8. Alsheimer M

    (2014) Analysis of meiosis in SUN1 deficient mice reveals a distinct role of SUN2 in mammalian meiotic LINC complex formation and function

    PLOS Genetics 10:e1004099.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004099

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Lu W
    2. Gotzmann J
    3. Sironi L
    4. Jaeger V-M
    5. Schneider M
    6. Lüke Y
    7. Uhlén M
    8. Szigyarto CA-K
    9. Brachner A
    10. Ellenberg J
    11. Foisner R
    12. Noegel AA
    13. Karakesisoglou I

    (2008) Sun1 forms immobile macromolecular assemblies at the nuclear envelope

    Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research 1783:2415–2426.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.09.001

    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Lu W
    2. Schneider M
    3. Neumann S
    4. Jaeger VM
    5. Taranum S
    6. Munck M
    7. Cartwright S
    8. Richardson C
    9. Carthew J
    10. Noh K
    11. Goldberg M
    12. Noegel AA
    13. Karakesisoglou I

    (2012) Nesprin interchain associations control nuclear size

    Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 69:3493–3509.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-012-1034-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Luxton GW
    2. Gomes ER
    3. Folker ES
    4. Vintinner E
    5. Gundersen GG

    (2010) Linear arrays of nuclear envelope proteins harness retrograde actin flow for nuclear movement

    Science 329:956–959.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189072

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Madeira F
    2. Park YM
    3. Lee J
    4. Buso N
    5. Gur T
    6. Madhusoodanan N
    7. Basutkar P
    8. Tivey ARN
    9. Potter SC
    10. Finn RD
    11. Lopez R

    (2019) The EMBL-EBI search and sequence analysis tools APIs in 2019

    Nucleic Acids Research 47:W636–W641.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz268

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. May CK
    2. Carroll CW

    (2018) Differential incorporation of SUN-domain proteins into LINC complexes is coupled to gene expression

    PLOS ONE 13:e0197621.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197621

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. McCoy AJ
    2. Grosse-Kunstleve RW
    3. Adams PD
    4. Winn MD
    5. Storoni LC
    6. Read RJ

    (2007) Phaser crystallographic software

    Journal of Applied Crystallography 40:658–674.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889807021206

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Meinke P
    2. Nguyen TD
    3. Wehnert MS

    (2011) The LINC complex and human disease

    Biochemical Society Transactions 39:1693–1697.

    https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20110658

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Meinke P
    2. Schirmer EC

    (2015) LINC'ing form and function at the nuclear envelope

    FEBS Letters 589:2514–2521.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2015.06.011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Morimoto A
    2. Shibuya H
    3. Zhu X
    4. Kim J
    5. Ishiguro K
    6. Han M
    7. Watanabe Y

    (2012) A conserved KASH domain protein associates with telomeres, SUN1, and dynactin during mammalian meiosis

    Journal of Cell Biology 198:165–172.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201204085

    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Nie S
    2. Ke H
    3. Gao F
    4. Ren J
    5. Wang M
    6. Huo L
    7. Gong W
    8. Feng W

    (2016) Coiled-Coil domains of SUN proteins as intrinsic dynamic regulators

    Structure 24:80–91.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2015.10.024

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Padmakumar VC
    2. Libotte T
    3. Lu W
    4. Zaim H
    5. Abraham S
    6. Noegel AA
    7. Gotzmann J
    8. Foisner R
    9. Karakesisoglou I

    (2005) The inner nuclear membrane protein Sun1 mediates the anchorage of Nesprin-2 to the nuclear envelope

    Journal of Cell Science 118:3419–3430.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02471

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Panjkovich A
    2. Svergun DI

    (2016) Deciphering conformational transitions of proteins by small angle X-ray scattering and normal mode analysis

    Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 18:5707–5719.

    https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP04540A

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Peränen J
    2. Rikkonen M
    3. Hyvönen M
    4. Kääriäinen L

    (1996) T7 vectors with modified T7lac promoter for expression of proteins in Escherichia coli

    Analytical Biochemistry 236:371–373.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1996.0187

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Petoukhov MV
    2. Franke D
    3. Shkumatov AV
    4. Tria G
    5. Kikhney AG
    6. Gajda M
    7. Gorba C
    8. Mertens HD
    9. Konarev PV
    10. Svergun DI

    (2012) New developments in the ATSAS program package for small-angle scattering data analysis

    Journal of Applied Crystallography 45:342–350.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889812007662

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Roux KJ
    2. Crisp ML
    3. Liu Q
    4. Kim D
    5. Kozlov S
    6. Stewart CL
    7. Burke B

    (2009) Nesprin 4 is an outer nuclear membrane protein that can induce kinesin-mediated cell polarization

    PNAS 106:2194–2199.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808602106

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Säbel CE
    2. Shepherd JL
    3. Siemann S

    (2009) A direct spectrophotometric method for the simultaneous determination of zinc and cobalt in metalloproteins using 4-(2-pyridylazo)resorcinol

    Analytical Biochemistry 391:74–76.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2009.05.007

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Sakamoto N
    2. Ogawa M
    3. Sadamoto K
    4. Takeuchi M
    5. Kataoka N

    (2017) Mechanical role of Nesprin-1-Mediated Nucleus-Actin filament binding in cyclic Stretch-Induced fibroblast elongation

    Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering 10:327–338.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-017-0487-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Shibuya H
    2. Ishiguro K
    3. Watanabe Y

    (2014) The TRF1-binding protein TERB1 promotes chromosome movement and telomere rigidity in meiosis

    Nature Cell Biology 16:145–156.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2896

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Sosa BA
    2. Rothballer A
    3. Kutay U
    4. Schwartz TU

    (2012) LINC complexes form by binding of three KASH peptides to domain interfaces of trimeric SUN proteins

    Cell 149:1035–1047.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.046

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Sosa BA
    2. Kutay U
    3. Schwartz TU

    (2013) Structural insights into LINC complexes

    Current Opinion in Structural Biology 23:285–291.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2013.03.005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Spindler MC
    2. Redolfi J
    3. Helmprobst F
    4. Kollmannsberger P
    5. Stigloher C
    6. Benavente R

    (2019) Electron tomography of mouse LINC complexes at meiotic telomere attachment sites with and without microtubules

    Communications Biology 2:376.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0621-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Starr DA
    2. Fridolfsson HN

    (2010) Interactions between nuclei and the cytoskeleton are mediated by SUN-KASH nuclear-envelope bridges

    Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 26:421–444.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104037

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Svergun D
    2. Barberato C
    3. Koch MHJ

    (1995) CRYSOL – a Program to Evaluate X-ray Solution Scattering of Biological Macromolecules from Atomic Coordinates

    Journal of Applied Crystallography 28:768–773.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889895007047

    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Taranum S
    2. Vaylann E
    3. Meinke P
    4. Abraham S
    5. Yang L
    6. Neumann S
    7. Karakesisoglou I
    8. Wehnert M
    9. Noegel AA

    (2012) LINC complex alterations in DMD and EDMD/CMT fibroblasts

    European Journal of Cell Biology 91:614–628.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2012.03.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Thakar K
    2. May CK
    3. Rogers A
    4. Carroll CW

    (2017) Opposing roles for distinct LINC complexes in regulation of the small GTPase RhoA

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 28:182–191.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e16-06-0467

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Wang W
    2. Shi Z
    3. Jiao S
    4. Chen C
    5. Wang H
    6. Liu G
    7. Wang Q
    8. Zhao Y
    9. Greene MI
    10. Zhou Z

    (2012) Structural insights into SUN-KASH complexes across the nuclear envelope

    Cell Research 22:1440–1452.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2012.126

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Waterhouse AM
    2. Procter JB
    3. Martin DM
    4. Clamp M
    5. Barton GJ

    (2009) Jalview version 2--a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench

    Bioinformatics 25:1189–1191.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Wilhelmsen K
    2. Litjens SHM
    3. Kuikman I
    4. Tshimbalanga N
    5. Janssen H
    6. van den Bout I
    7. Raymond K
    8. Sonnenberg A

    (2005) Nesprin-3, a novel outer nuclear membrane protein, associates with the cytoskeletal linker protein plectin

    Journal of Cell Biology 171:799–810.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200506083

    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Winter G

    (2010) xia2 : an expert system for macromolecular crystallography data reduction

    Journal of Applied Crystallography 43:186–190.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889809045701

    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Xu Y
    2. Li W
    3. Ke H
    4. Feng W

    (2018) Structural conservation of the autoinhibitory domain in SUN proteins

    Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 496:1337–1343.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.02.015

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Zetka M
    2. Paouneskou D
    3. Jantsch V

    (2020) "The nuclear envelope, a meiotic jack-of-all-trades"

    Current Opinion in Cell Biology 64:34–42.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2019.12.010

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Zhang X
    2. Lei K
    3. Yuan X
    4. Wu X
    5. Zhuang Y
    6. Xu T
    7. Xu R
    8. Han M

    (2009) SUN1/2 and syne/Nesprin-1/2 complexes connect centrosome to the nucleus during neurogenesis and neuronal migration in mice

    Neuron 64:173–187.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.08.018

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Zhou Z
    2. Du X
    3. Cai Z
    4. Song X
    5. Zhang H
    6. Mizuno T
    7. Suzuki E
    8. Yee MR
    9. Berezov A
    10. Murali R
    11. Wu S-L
    12. Karger BL
    13. Greene MI
    14. Wang Q

    (2012) Structure of Sad1-UNC84 homology (SUN) Domain defines features of molecular bridge in nuclear envelope

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 287:5317–5326.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.304543

    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Zhou C
    2. Rao L
    3. Shanahan CM
    4. Zhang Q

    (2018a) Nesprin-1/2: roles in nuclear envelope organisation, myogenesis and muscle disease

    Biochemical Society Transactions 46:311–320.

    https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20170149

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Zhou C
    2. Rao L
    3. Warren DT
    4. Shanahan CM
    5. Zhang Q

    (2018b) Mouse models of nesprin-related diseases

    Biochemical Society Transactions 46:669–681.

    https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20180085

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Zhu R
    2. Antoku S
    3. Gundersen GG

    (2017) Centrifugal Displacement of Nuclei Reveals Multiple LINC Complex Mechanisms for Homeostatic Nuclear Positioning

    Current Biology 27:3097–3110.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.073

    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Manickam Gurusaran

   1. Institute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
   2. Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom

   Contribution

   Data curation, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6603-3118

2. Owen Richard Davies

   1. Institute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
   2. Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing

   For correspondence

   owen.davies@ed.ac.uk

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3806-5403

• 3,457

  views

• 313

  downloads

• 32

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.