1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

Cryo-EM analysis of PIP2 regulation in mammalian GIRK channels

  1. Yiming Niu
  2. Xiao Tao
  3. Kouki K Touhara
  4. Roderick MacKinnon  Is a corresponding author
  1. Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology and Biophysics, The Rockefeller University, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60552
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Yiming Niu
  2. Xiao Tao
  3. Kouki K Touhara
  4. Roderick MacKinnon
(2020)
Cryo-EM analysis of PIP2 regulation in mammalian GIRK channels
eLife 9:e60552.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60552
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

G-protein-gated inward rectifier potassium (GIRK) channels are regulated by G proteins and PIP2. Here, using cryo-EM single particle analysis we describe the equilibrium ensemble of structures of neuronal GIRK2 as a function of the C8-PIP2 concentration. We find that PIP2 shifts the equilibrium between two distinguishable structures of neuronal GIRK (GIRK2), extended and docked, towards the docked form. In the docked form the cytoplasmic domain, to which Gβγ binds, becomes accessible to the cytoplasmic membrane surface where Gβγ resides. Furthermore, PIP2 binding reshapes the Gβγ binding surface on the cytoplasmic domain, preparing it to receive Gβγ. We find that cardiac GIRK (GIRK1/4) can also exist in both extended and docked conformations. These findings lead us to conclude that PIP2 influences GIRK channels in a structurally similar manner to Kir2.2 channels. In Kir2.2 channels, the PIP2-induced conformational changes open the pore. In GIRK channels, they prepare the channel for activation by Gβγ.

Introduction

The inward rectifier K+ (Kir) channels were originally named for their rectifying current-voltage relationship (Hagiwara et al., 1976; Hagiwara and Takahashi, 1974; Hodgkin and Horowicz, 1959; Noble, 1965). Today, this class of ion channels is defined by characteristic structural features encoded by the Kir family of related genes (Hibino et al., 2010). All Kir channels are tetramers of identical or related subunits that encode a K+ selectivity filter-containing transmembrane pore (TMD for transmembrane domain) and a cytoplasmic domain (CTD) (Tao et al., 2009; Whorton and MacKinnon, 2011). The TMD and CTD are covalently linked by a tether, called here the TMD-CTD linker (Tao et al., 2009; Whorton and MacKinnon, 2011). In eukaryotic cells, Kir channels underlie many physiological processes, including neuronal electrical activity, electrolyte homeostasis in the kidney, insulin secretion, and heart rate control (Hibino et al., 2010).

To fulfill their many biological roles, different eukaryotic Kir channels respond to unique ligands. However, as far as we know, they all respond to the signaling lipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) (Hibino et al., 2010; Hilgemann et al., 2001; Huang et al., 1998; Stanfield et al., 2002). In fact, the two features all eukaryotic Kir channels have in common are K+ selectivity and responsiveness to PIP2. A specific mechanism for PIP2 regulation of Kir2.2 has been proposed (Hansen et al., 2011; Tao et al., 2009). As depicted (Figure 1A), in the absence of PIP2 the CTD is disengaged from the TMD, resulting in an ‘extended’ conformation (Tao et al., 2009). Upon PIP2 binding, the TMD-CTD loop forms a helix and the CTD engages the TMD to form a ‘docked’ conformation in which the channel opens (Hansen et al., 2011).

Figure 1 with 3 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
GIRK2 adopts an extended conformation in the absence of PIP2.

(A) Conformational changes upon PIP2 binding in the Kir2.2 channel viewed from side with the extracellular side above (Left: the extended conformation without PIP2, PDB: 3JYC. Right: the docked conformation upon PIP2 binding, PDB: 3SPI). Four PIP2 molecules are shown as sticks and colored according to atom type: carbon, yellow; phosphorous, orange; and oxygen, red. The CTD translates towards the TMD by 6 Å upon PIP2 binding. A set of reference atoms (Asp72 and Lys220 α-carbons) are highlighted as blue spheres in each structure. (B) Side and top views of the cryo-EM structure of the GIRK2 channel in an extended conformation.

G-protein-gated inward rectifier K+ (GIRK) channels are activated by both PIP2 and Gβγ (Huang et al., 1998; Logothetis et al., 1987; Logothetis and Zhang, 1999; Sui et al., 1998). Detailed mechanistic studies in a reconstituted system using a neuronal isoform of GIRK (GIRK2) showed that both PIP2 and Gβγ are required to open the pore (Wang et al., 2014). Crystal structures of GIRK2 in the absence and presence of PIP2 (and in the presence of Gβγ) did not show a change in the relationship between the CTD and TMD as was seen in Kir2.2 (Hansen et al., 2011; Tao et al., 2009; Whorton and MacKinnon, 2011; Whorton and MacKinnon, 2013). In this manuscript, we study the structural effects of PIP2 on neuronal GIRK2 and cardiac GIRK1/4 using cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and correlate these effects with known properties of PIP2 activation.

Results

GIRK2 adopts an extended conformation in the absence of PIP2

Figure 1B shows the structure of the mouse GIRK2 channel in the absence of PIP2 (CryoEMApo) at a resolution of 3.9 Å by cryo-EM single particle analysis. The corresponding cryo-EM map is shown in Figure 1—figure supplements 1 and 2. In the absence of PIP2 it is clear that GIRK2 can adopt a conformation in which the CTD is disengaged from the TMD and the TMD-CTD linker has to be extended to account for the separation between the TMD and CTD. Thus, in the absence of PIP2, the global conformation of GIRK2 appears much like the Kir2.2 channel in the absence of PIP2 (i.e. both channels adopt an extended conformation) (Figure 1A and B; Tao et al., 2009).

Using X-ray crystallography, we had determined a structure of GIRK2 in the absence of PIP2 (CrystalApo) that did not adopt this extended conformation (Figure 1—figure supplement 3A; Whorton and MacKinnon, 2011). Detailed differences in the structures of CryoEMApo and CrystalApo are shown (Figure 1—figure supplement 3B and C). The crystal lattice offers a possible explanation for conformational differences between CryoEMApo and CrystalApo (Figure 1—figure supplement 3D). Symmetry-related tetramers in the crystal contact each other through ~500 Å2 buried surface area on the CTD (PISA server) (Krissinel and Henrick, 2007), as shown in the inset of Figure 1—figure supplement 3D. Because in the extended conformation the CTD and TMD are free to move with respect to each other without hindrance, these two structured regions may have been pushed together when the crystal was formed. Single particle cryo-EM, without the potential interference of lattice contacts, might provide a structure that more accurately portrays a GIRK2 channel in the cell membrane.

GIRK2 and Kir2.2 are structurally similar channels, but differ functionally in an important aspect. PIP2 is necessary and sufficient to open Kir2.2, but must operate in conjunction with Gβγ to open GIRK2. This important distinction notwithstanding, the difference between CrystalApo and CryoEMApo conformations leads us to ask which conformation better reflects reality in the membrane? To pursue this question further, we used cryo-EM single particle analysis to study the dependence of the GIRK2 conformation as a function of PIP2 concentration.

GIRK2 conformation as a function of PIP2 concentration

GIRK2 channels were vitrified in the presence of PIP2 (soluble C8-PIP2) concentrations ranging from 0 mM to 1.0 mM. Data were collected and analyzed using the approach applied to the Na+ dependence of the Slo2 K+ channel conformation (Hite and MacKinnon, 2017). Images from all concentrations were merged into a single 'titration dataset' and 3D refinement was carried out in RELION (Scheres, 2012). Particles were then classified (five classes requested) without refinement of angles or translations. Four classes (1-4) were similar to each other and showed a disengaged CTD (i.e. extended conformation) with an unresolved TMD-CTD linker (Figure 2A). Class 5 showed an engaged CTD (i.e. CTD-docked conformation) and a visible TMD-CTD linker (Figure 2A). The fraction of channels contributing to the CTD-docked conformation (class 5) increased as PIP2 concentration increased (Figure 2B and C).

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
GIRK2 conformation as a function of PIP2 concentration.

(A) Structural titration image analysis workflow. Representative images of GIRK2 channels recorded in the presence of 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 0.875 or 1 mM C8-PIP2. GIRK2 particles were automatically selected from the images (green circles). The extracted particles from the respective images were combined into a single titration dataset for 3D refinement with C4 symmetry in RELION. Using the angles and translations obtained from the 3D refinement, the particles from the titration dataset were classified into five classes. The extended classes are colored red and the docked class blue. (B) Representative cryo-EM images of GIRK2 in the presence of 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 0.875 or 1 mM C8-PIP2. Particles marked with a red circle were classified as extended, and those with a blue circle were classified as docked. (C) The fraction of particles classified as the docked conformation of GIRK2 is plotted against the concentration of C8-PIP2.

To further examine the 3D classification result, we performed classification five times independently and compared the outcome. As shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 1A, the fraction of channels contributing to the docked class at each PIP2 concentration remained fairly constant for the five independent runs, indicating that the classification algorithm yields a reproducible outcome. In addition, of all the channels classified as docked, more than 80% were classified as such four or five times (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B). These data indicate that the population of channels in the docked conformation is positively correlated with the concentration of PIP2.

Figure 2C shows that the fraction of docked channels increased from approximately 0.08 to 0.30 when PIP2 is increased from 0 mM to 1.0 mM. We previously showed that the activity of GIRK2 channels in membranes increases as a function of PIP2 concentration with an activation constant ~15 μM (and Hill coefficient ~3.1) (Wang et al., 2014). The large difference in PIP2 activity between these studies likely originates in the difference between the detergent micelle and the lipid membrane environment. PIP2 partitions into membranes (differently than into detergent micelles) and therefore the local concentrations of PIP2 are unknown.

It is also notable that a fraction (~0.08) of docked channels exists in the absence of PIP2 (Figure 2C). In functional studies in membranes we found that the open fraction of GIRK2 channels in the absence of PIP2 (but in the presence of Gβγ) is probably less than 0.01 (Wang et al., 2014). Again, there is an uncertainty that precludes direct comparison of these numbers: we do not know what fraction of docked channels are open. In other words, docking may be a necessary but not necessarily a sufficient condition to open the pore.

We found previously that the presence of 32 mM Na+ substantially increases the open probability of GIRK2 at all concentrations of PIP2 examined (Wang et al., 2014). The experiments behind Figure 2 were carried out in the absence of added Na+. It is possible that addition of Na+ would increase the fraction of docked channels.

Presently, we conclude that formation of the docked channel is positively correlated with increased PIP2 concentration.

GIRK1/4 channels also form extended and docked conformations

GIRK2 channels predominate in the nervous system while GIRK4 (Kir3.4) and heteromultimeric GIRK1/4 (Kir3.1/Kir3.4) channels function in the cardiovascular system where they regulate heart rate through parasympathetic nervous system control (Corey and Clapham, 1998; Karschin et al., 1996; Krapivinsky et al., 1995; Kubo et al., 1993; Lesage et al., 1994; Lesage et al., 1995). GIRK1/4 channels were expressed as previously described (Touhara et al., 2016) and cryo-EM samples were prepared in the presence of 0.5 mM C8-PIP2. Data were collected and images processed as shown (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). 3D classification revealed both extended (26% particles) and docked (22% particles) conformations (Figure 3 and Figure 3—figure supplement 1). Three remaining classes, accounting for 52% of the data, were insufficiently resolved to determine details of the underlying conformations. The two resolved conformations exhibit features similar to those of GIRK2, with lengths of ~119 Å and ~112 Å for extended and docked conformations, respectively, a well-resolved linker in the docked conformation but not in the extended conformation, and a 35° difference in the rotation of the CTD with respect to the TMD (Figure 3). We conclude that GIRK1/4, like GIRK2, can adopt the extended and docked conformations.

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
GIRK1/4 channels also form extended and docked conformations.

(A and B) Side views of the cryo-EM density map of the extended (A) and docked (B) conformations of the GIRK1/4 channel. (C) Top view of the CTD regions aligned with respect to the TMD reveals a 35° rotation from extended to docked conformations.

Conformational changes in the PIP2 and Gβγ binding sites on GIRK2

Using all particles classified as ‘docked’ in the titration dataset, we reconstructed a best map of the GIRK2 channel with four bound PIP2 molecules (CryoEMPIP2) at a resolution of 3.3 Å (Figure 4A, Figure 4—figure supplements 1 and 2). The TMD-CTD linker forms a well-resolved helix in contrast to a flexible loop in the CryoEMApo structure. This conformational change positions Lys199 and Lys200, along with Lys194 from the inner helix and Lys90 from the outer helix, to form electrostatic interactions with the PIP2 molecule (Figure 4B). In addition, the 6 Å translation and 35o rotation of the CTD associated with PIP2 binding brings Lys64 (from the N-terminus) near enough to PIP2 to engage its 4’-phosphate (Figure 4B and C and Figure 4—figure supplement 3). The sidechains of positively charged residues that coordinate PIP2 are disordered in the CryoEMApo structure. Thus, PIP2 binding stabilizes the docked conformation through interactions between the 4’,5’-phosphate-substituted inositol head group of PIP2 and Lys64 (with the 4’ phosphate) and Lys194, Lys199, Lys200 (with the 5’ phosphate). An analogous constellation of charge-pair stabilization is observed in the PIP2 bound form of Kir2.2 (Hansen et al., 2011; Tao et al., 2009).

Figure 4 with 3 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Conformational changes between the docked and extended GIRK2 channel upon PIP2 binding.

(A) Side and top views of the cryo-EM density map of the docked conformation of GIRK2 channel (cyan) with four bound PIP2 molecules (orange). The PIP2 acyl chains were only partially resolved. (B) Close-up view of the PIP2 binding pocket. PIP2 is shown as sticks and colored according to atom type (carbon, yellow; phosphorous, orange; and oxygen, red). The PIP2 interacting residues are also shown as sticks (carbon, cyan and nitrogen, blue). (C) Comparison of the extended (gray, no PIP2) and the docked (cyan, with 4 PIP2 bound) structures. The channel is viewed from the side with the extracellular side above. The lipid bilayer boundaries are shown as grey bars. Four PIP2 molecules are shown as sticks and colored as in panel (B). The PIP2 molecule in a similar orientation as in (B) is outlined by a black box. Upon PIP2 binding, the CTD in the extended structure translates towards the TMD by 6 Å accompanied by a 35° rotation viewed from the extracellular side. (D and E) Local conformational changes at the binding site for Gβγ in the βL-βM loop of GIRK2 CTD are shown by structural superposition. The CTD region of GIRK2 CryoEMApo, CryoEMPIP2 and CrystalGIRK-Gβγ structures are colored gray, cyan, and blue, respectively. Rearrangement of the βL-βM loop is indicated by an arrow.

Another conformational change associated with PIP2 binding occurs on the side of the CTD, involving the βL-βM loop, as shown (Figure 4D and E). The βL-βM loop does not make direct contact with the PIP2 binding site but apparently is allosterically coupled to it. The possible importance of the βL-βM loop conformational change is implied through superposition of CryoEMApo CTD and CryoEMPIP2 CTD with the CTD from the crystal structure of GIRK2 in complex with Gβγ (CrystalGIRK-Gβγ). The βL-βM loop is located on the surface to which Gβγ binds. In CryoEMPIP2, the βL-βM loop adopts the position observed in the Gβγ complex. Thus, it would appear that PIP2 binding to GIRK2 pre-configures the Gβγ binding surface on the CTD into a receptive conformation.

Discussion

The main conclusion of this study is that GIRK channels – GIRK2 as well as GIRK1/4 – can adopt extended and docked conformations. With GIRK2 we show that the docked conformation is favored in the presence of PIP2. We think that crystal contacts in the previous CrystalApo structure pushed the CTD and TMD into close proximity (Whorton and MacKinnon, 2011). It seems likely that PIP2 in GIRK channels, as previously proposed for Kir2.2 channels (Hansen et al., 2011; Tao et al., 2009), mediates the docking of the CTD onto the TMD. Electrostatic interactions between the anionic headgroup of PIP2 and cationic amino acid sidechains on the channel serve to tether the CTD to the TMD. Many of these electrostatic interactions are conserved in GIRK and Kir2.2. A secondary conformational change occurs on the side of the CTD corresponding to the Gβγ binding surface. This change configures the surface ready to bind Gβγ.

These effects of PIP2 on GIRK2 are summarized in a cartoon (Figure 5A and B). By tethering the CTD to the TMD, PIP2 brings the CTD close to the membrane surface where it can be reached by Gβγ, which is held at the membrane surface by its covalent attachment to a lipid tail. Coincidentally, the binding surface for Gβγ on the CTD adopts a permissive conformation, allowing Gβγ to bind. This proposed mechanism is consistent with the demonstration that Gβγ is unable to open GIRK2 in the absence of PIP2 (Wang et al., 2014): without PIP2, Gβγ is unable to access its binding site on GIRK2.

Figure 5
Download asset Open asset
PIP2 serves as an allosteric regulator to permit Gβγ binding.

(A and B) A cartoon depiction of PIP2 regulation of GIRK channels. The blue shape depicts the GIRK channel. a, b, c, d, and e indicate the selectivity filter, inner helix gate, TMD-CTD linker, the G-loop gate, and the βL-βM loop, respectively. Circular arrow indicates the rotation about the pore axis with respect to the TMD and perpendicular arrow indicates CTD translation upon PIP2 binding. The ‘gg’ label represents the geranylgeranyl lipid modification at the C terminus of Gγ. In the absence of PIP2 (A), GIRK2 channel adopts the extended conformation and is not positioned for Gβγ binding. Upon PIP2 binding (B), the GIRK2 channel transits to the docked conformation, allowing Gβγ binding to occur. (C) Plot of pore diameter (between van der Waals surfaces, calculated with Hole) for the extended (gray) and docked (cyan) structures. (D and E) Superposition of the channel TMD from the extended (gray) and docked (cyan) structures. Conformational changes at the inner helix gate (D) and G-loop gate (E) are boxed and zoomed-in details are shown. Sidechains of the inner helix gate-forming residue Phe192 are shown as sticks. Cα atoms of the G-loop gate constriction residue Met313 are shown as spheres.

How do the PIP2-induced conformational changes help to open the pore? GIRK channels have two gates along their ion conduction pore: an inner helix gate in the TMD and a G-loop gate at the apex of the CTD (Doyle et al., 1998; Jiang et al., 2002; Nishida et al., 2007; Pegan et al., 2005; Whorton and MacKinnon, 2011; Whorton and MacKinnon, 2013). In the absence of PIP2, the inner helix gate of GIRK2 is most tightly constricted at position Phe192 in the inner helix, which lines the pore on the intracellular side of the selectivity filter (Figure 5C and D). PIP2 binding and docking of the CTD onto the TMD is associated with a modest change in the conformation of the inner helix, a repositioning of the sidechain of Phe192, and widening of the pore. The G-loop gate actually constricts when the CTD docks onto the TMD (Figure 5C and E). Thus, it would appear that when four PIP2 molecules bind to GIRK2, the inner helix gate opens, or begins to open, but the pore remains closed owing to a constricted G-loop gate. This interpretation is consistent with functional data showing that PIP2 is unable to open GIRK2 in the absence of Gβγ (Wang et al., 2014) because the G-loop gate remains closed.

In summary, it appears that PIP2 in GIRK channels enables Gβγ-mediated opening by bringing the CTD near the intracellular membrane surface and rendering the Gβγ binding surface permissive for attachment.

Materials and methods

Key resources table
Reagent type
(species) or
resource		DesignationSource or
reference		IdentifiersAdditional
information
Gene (Mus musculus GIRK2)GIRK2syntheticSynthesized at GeneWiz.
Gene (Homo sapiens GIRK1)GIRK1syntheticSynthesized at GeneWiz.
Gene (Homo sapiens GIRK4)GIRK4syntheticSynthesized at GeneWiz.
Strain, strain background (Escherichia coli)DH10BacThermoFisher10361012
Recombinant DNA reagentpPICZ-GIRK2https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.046Maintained at the Mackinnon lab
Recombinant DNA reagentGIRK1-His10-pEG BacMamhttps://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15750.001Maintained at the Mackinnon lab
Recombinant DNA reagentGIRK4-1D4-pEG BacMamhttps://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15750.001Maintained at the Mackinnon lab
Cell line (Pichia pastoris)SMD1163InvitrogenC17500
Cell line
(Spodoptera frugiperda)		Sf9ATCCCat# CRL-1711
Cell line (Homo sapiens)HEK293S GnTI-ATCCCat# CRL-3022
Chemical compound, drugSF-900 II SFM mediumGIBCOCat# 10902–088
Chemical compound, drugL-Glutamine (100x)GIBCOCat# 25030–081
Chemical compound, drugPen StrepGIBCOCat# 15140–122
Chemical compound, drugGrace’s insect mediumGIBCOCat# 11605–094
Chemical compound, drugFreestyle 293 mediumGIBCOCat# 12338–018
Chemical compound, drugFetal bovine serumGIBCOCat# 16000–044
Chemical compound, drugCellfectin II reagentInvitrogenCat# 10362100
Chemical compound, drugCholesteryl hemisuccinate (CHS)AnatraceCH210
Chemical compound, drugn-Dodecyl-β-D-Maltopyranoside (DDM)AnatraceD310S
Chemical compound, drugn-Decyl-β-D-Maltopyranoside (DM)AnatraceD322S
Chemical compound, drug1,2-dioctanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1'-myo-inositol-4',5'-bisphosphate) (ammonium salt) (C8-PIP2)Avanti Polar Lipids850185P
Chemical compound, drug(1H, 1H, 2H, 2H-Perfluorooctyl)phosphocholine (FFC8)AnatraceF300F
Commercial assay or kitCNBr-activated Sepharose beadsGE HealthcareCat# 17-0430-01
Commercial assay or kitSuperdex 200 Increase 10/300 GLGE Healthcare Life Sciences28990944
Commercial assay or kitR1.2/1.3 400 mesh Au holey carbon gridsQuantifoil1210627
Commercial assay or kitSuperose 6 Increase 10/300 GLGE Healthcare Life Sciences29091596
Software, algorithmRELION 3.0https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42166.001http://www2.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/relion
Software, algorithmRELION 3.1https://doi.org/10.1101/798066http://www2.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/relion
Software, algorithmMotionCor2https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4193http://msg.ucsf.edu/em/software/motioncor2.html
Software, algorithmGctf 1.0.6https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2015.11.003https://www.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/kzhang/Gctf/
Software, algorithmCtfFind4.1.8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008http://grigoriefflab.janelia.org/ctffind4
Software, algorithmGautomatchhttps://www.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/kzhang/Gautomatch/
Software, algorithmCryoSPARC 2.4.0https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46057.001https://cryosparc.com/
Software, algorithmPyemhttps://github.com/asarnow/pyem
Software, algorithmCOOThttps://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444910007493http://www2.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/personal/ pemsley/coot
Software, algorithmPHENIXhttps://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444909052925https://www.phenix-online.org
Software, algorithmAdobe Photoshop version 16.0.0 (for figure preparation)Adobe Systems, Inc
Software, algorithmGraphPad Prism version 8.0GraphPad Software
Software, algorithmMacPyMOL: PyMOL v2.0 Enhanced for Mac OS XSchrodinger LLChttps://pymol.org/edu/?q=educational/
Software, algorithmChimerahttps://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20084https://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/download.html
Software, algorithmSerial EMhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.007http://bio3d.colorado.edu/SerialEM
Software, algorithmHOLEhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7855(97)00009-Xhttp://www.holeprogram.org

Protein expression and purification

Request a detailed protocol

Mouse GIRK2 (residues 52–380) was expressed in Pichia pastoris as previously described (Whorton and MacKinnon, 2011). Frozen cells were lysed in a mixer mill, and resuspended in 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 150 mM KCl and protease inhibitor cocktail for 1 hr at 4°C. The resuspension was adjusted to pH 8.0, then 4% (w/v) n-decyl-β-D-maltopyranoside (DM) and 0.8% (w/v) cholesterol hemisuccinate (CHS) (or 4% n-dodecyl-β-D-maltopyranoside (DDM) and 0.8% CHS for the apo GIRK2 sample) were added to extract for 2 hr at 4°C. The mixture was centrifuged at 37,500 g for 30 min and the supernatant incubated with GFP nanobody-coupled CNBr-activated Sepharose resin (GE Healthcare) for 1–2 hr at 4°C (Kubala et al., 2010). The resin was subsequently washed with 10 column volumes of wash buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 150 mM KCl, 0.2% DM and 0.04% CHS for structural titration samples, or 0.05% DDM and 0.01% CHS for apo GIRK2 sample). The washed resin was incubated overnight with PreScission protease at a target protein to protease ratio of 40:1 (w:w) to cleave off GFP and release the protein from the resin. The protein was eluted with wash buffer, concentrated using an Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter (MWCO 100 kDa), and then injected onto a Superdex 200 increase 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with SEC buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 10 mM DTT, 1 mM EDTA, 0.2% DM and 0.04% CHS for structural titration samples, or 0.05% DDM and 0.01% CHS for apo GIRK2 sample). Peak fractions corresponding to the GIRK2 tetramer were pooled and concentrated to 6–7 mg/ml using an Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter (MWCO 100 kDa).

Full-length human GIRK1 and GIRK4 genes were cloned into a pEG BacMam vector, and co-expressed in HEK293S GnTI- (ATCC CRL-3022) cells as previously described (Touhara et al., 2016). Cells were solubilized in 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 150 mM KCl, 1.5% (w/v) DDM, 0.3% (w/v) CHS, and protease inhibitor cocktail. Two hours after solubilization, lysed cells were centrifuged at 37,500 g for 30 min and supernatant was incubated with Talon metal affinity resin (Clontech Laboratories, Inch. Mountain View, CA) for 1 hr at 4°C with gentle mixing. The resin was washed in batch with five column volumes of buffer A (50 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 150 mM KCl, 0.05% [w/v] DDM, 0.01% [w/v] CHS), then loaded onto a column and further washed with five column volumes of buffer A + 10 mM imidazole. The protein was then eluted with buffer A + 200 mM imidazole. The peak fraction was collected and incubated with the 1D4 affinity resin for 1 hr at 4°C with gentle mixing. The resin was loaded onto a column and washed with buffer A. Five mM DTT and 1 mM EDTA were added and eGFP and affinity tags were cut with PreScission protease overnight at 4°C. The cleaved protein was then concentrated to run on a Superose 6 10/300 GL gel filtration column in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM KCl, 100 mM NaCl, 0.025% (w/v) DDM, 0.005% (w/v) CHS, 10 mM DTT, and 1 mM EDTA. Protein was finally concentrated to ~5 mg/ml using an Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter (MWCO 100 kDa).

Cryo-EM sample preparation and data collection

Request a detailed protocol

For the apo GIRK2 sample, purified GIRK2 at a concentration of 6–7 mg/ml was mixed with Fluorinated Fos-Choline-8 (FFC8) (Anatrace) stock at 29 mM to a final concentration of 2.9 mM immediately prior to application of 3.5 μL of the mixture onto a glow-discharged Quantifoil R1.2/1.3 400 mesh Au grid (Quantifoil), blotted for 4 s at room temperature (RT) with a blotting force of 2–4 and plunge-frozen in liquid ethane using a Vitrobot Mark IV (FEI).

For the structural titration samples, purified GIRK2 at a concentration of 6–7 mg/ml was mixed with C8-PIP2 stock at 10 mM to a final concentration of 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 0.875 or 1 mM. In an earlier study (Wang et al., 2014), we showed that C8-PIP2 activates GIRK2 channels in lipid membranes with an activation constant ~15 μM and Hill coefficient n ~ 3. C8-PIP2 partitions into membranes and thus the local concentration near the channel is unknown. We chose the higher concentration range in the structural study because the channels are in detergent micelles, where local concentrations of PIP2, compared to studies with lipid membranes, are expected to be lower. The mixtures were further mixed with FFC8 stock to a final concentration of 2.9 mM, and 3.5 μL aliquots of the protein were pipetted onto glow-discharged Quantifoil R1.2/1.3 400 mesh Au grids and blotted with the same settings as for apo GIRK2 using a Vitrobot Mark IV.

For GIRK1/4 samples, purified GIRK1/4 at a concentration of ~5 mg/ml was mixed with C8-PIP2 stock at 10 mM to the final concentration of 0.5 mM. 3.5 μL aliquots of the protein were then pipetted onto glow-discharged Quantifoil R1.2/1.3 400 mesh Au grids and blotted for 1 s at RT with a blotting force of 1 and plunge-frozen in liquid ethane using a Vitrobot Mark IV.

Cryo-EM data were collected on a 300-kV Titan Krios electron microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a K3 Summit (apo GIRK2 sample) or K2 Summit (other samples) direct electron detector in super-resolution mode. After binning over 2 × 2 pixels, the calibrated pixel size was 0.86 Å, 1 Å and 1.03 Å for apo GIRK2, structural titration samples and GIRK1/4, respectively. For the apo GIRK2 sample, exposures of 3 s were dose-fractionated into 80 frames with a dose rate of 25.5 electrons per pixel per second, resulting in a total dose of 103.3 electrons per Å2. For structural titration samples and GIRK1/4 samples, exposures of 10 s were dose-fractionated into 50 frames with a dose rate of 8 electrons per pixel per second, resulting in a total dose of 80 (structural titration samples) or 75.4 (GIRK1/4 sample) electrons per Å2, respectively. Cryo-EM data collection statistics are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1
Cryo-EM data collection and refinement statistics, related to Figures 1, 2 and 4.
GIRK2ExtendedGIRK2DockedGIRK1/4ExtendedGIRK1/4Docked
EMDB IDEMD-22199EMD-22200EMD-22201EMD-22202
PDB ID6XIS6XIT
Data collection
MicroscopeTitan Krios
DetectorK3 summitK2 summit
Voltage (kV)300
Pixel size (Å)0.430.50.515
Total electron exposure
(e-/Å2)		103.380.075.4
Defocus range (μm)1.0 to
3.0		1.5 to
2.5		1.5 to
3.5
Micrographs collected210311,3493415
Reconstruction
Final particle images112,517155,12857,64448,757
Pixel size (Å)1.2911.031.03
Box size (pixels)256400256256
Resolution (Å)
(FSC = 0.143)		3.93.37.94.6
Map Sharpening B-factor (Å2)−26−12-−192
Model composition
Non-hydrogen atoms946010,252
Protein residues124013,08
Ligands04
Metals03
Refinement
Model-to-map CC (mask)0.620.72
Model-to-map CC (volume)0.640.75
R.m.s deviations
Bond length (Å)0.0060.009
Bond angles (°)1.31.3
Validation
MolProbity score2.001.80
Clash score8.559.91
Ramachandran plot
Outliers (%)00
Allowed (%)1.74.0
Favored (%)98.396.0
Rotamer outliers (%)1.400.74
C-beta deviations (%)00

Cryo-EM data processing

Request a detailed protocol

Image processing was performed in both CryoSPARC-2.9.0 (Structura Biotechnology) (Punjani et al., 2017) and RELION (Scheres, 2012; Zivanov et al., 2018; Zivanov et al., 2020). All movie frames were corrected with a gain reference collected during the same EM session, and specimen movement was corrected using MotionCorr2 (Zheng et al., 2017) with dose weighting. The contrast transfer function (CTF) parameters were estimated using Gctf-1.0.6 (Zhang, 2016). Images showing substantial ice contamination, abnormal background, thick ice, low contrast or poor Thon rings were discarded.

For structure determination of the apo GIRK2, 2049 of 2103 micrographs were selected for further processing. Particles were picked with the Laplacian-of-Gaussian auto-picking implemented in RELION-3 without templates. 502,731 auto-picked particles were extracted into 384 × 384 pixel images. The particle images were binned 1.5 times and subjected to Ab-initio reconstruction in CryoSPARC-2.9.0, specifying four output classes. The best class, including 216,085 particles were selected for homogeneous refinement with C4 symmetry, which yielded a map at 5.6 Å resolution. The particles were transferred back to RELION-3 using the pyem package (https://github.com/asarnow/pyem), re-extracted into 320 × 320 pixel images, binned 1.5 times and further refined with C4 symmetry after Bayesian polishing and CTF refinement, generating an improved map at 4.3 Å resolution. Focused refinement was performed on the CTD region, followed by the focused 3D classification on the TMD region without image alignment similar to a previous report (Lee and MacKinnon, 2018), revealing significant heterogeneity at the TMD region. Finally, 112,571 particles with fine features of TMD were selected and subjected to Non-uniform refinement and local refinement in CryoSPARC-2.9.0, which yielded the final map at 3.9 Å resolution.

For the structural titration of the GIRK2 channel, roughly 90–95% of micrographs from each PIP2 concentration dataset were selected for further processing. Different views from 2D averages of the apo GIRK2 dataset were selected as templates for particle picking using Gautomatch (https://www.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/kzhang/Gautomatch/). Auto-picked particles for each PIP2 concentration were extracted into 384 × 384 pixel images, binned 1.5 times, and subjected to Ab-initio reconstruction in CryoSPARC-2.9.0, specifying four output classes (Punjani et al., 2017). Non-protein particles were removed, resulting in 99,381, 109,462, 105,388, 123,649, 99,619 and 105,708 particle images for the 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 0.875 and 1 mM PIP2 datasets, respectively. After manual inspection, all these particles were combined (a total of 643,657) and transferred back to RELION-3. The particles were re-extracted into 320 × 320 pixel images, binned 1.5 times and subjected to 3D refinement in RELION-3 with the density map of apo GIRK2 as reference (low-pass filtered to 60 Å). Subsequently, the angular and translational parameters determined using 3D auto-refine were fixed throughout 25 cycles of 3D classification, specifying five classes in RELION-3 with the map generated by 3D auto-refine low-pass filtered to 60 Å serving as the initial model. Manual inspection identified one class with characteristics of the docked class and contributions of all six datasets to this 3D class were determined using identifiers uniquely associated with each particle during particle extraction. To ensure the reproducibility of the 3D classification algorithm, the 643,657 particles were subjected to five independent runs of 3D auto-refine and 3D classification.

For structure determination of GIRK2 with PIP2 bound, the 155,128 particles corresponding to the docked class in the structural titration dataset was refined applying C4 symmetry using the Non-uniform refinement algorithm in CryoSPARC-2.9., resulting in a map at 4.6 Å resolution. The refined particles were then transferred back to RELION, followed by CTF refinement and Bayesian polishing, which improved the map to 4.0 Å. Particles were then re-extracted into 400 × 400 pixel images and subjected to multiple runs of CTF refinement in RELION-3.1 as described (Scheres, 2019; Zivanov et al., 2020). Further 3D refinement with C4 symmetry in RELION-3.1 yielded a final map at 3.3 Å resolution.

For the GIRK1/4 channel dataset with 0.5 mM C8-PIP2, 3377 of 3415 micrographs were selected for further processing. Different views of 2D averages from the apo GIRK2 dataset were selected as templates and Gautomatch was used for particle picking. The auto-picked 554,081 particles were extracted into 256 × 256 pixel images, binned two times and subjected to Ab-initio reconstruction in CryoSPARC-2.9.0, specifying four output classes. The best of the four classes, including 221,633 particles, were selected for homogeneous refinement applying C2 symmetry, which yielded a map at 7.7 Å resolution. The particles were transferred back to RELION-3 using the pyem package with angular and translational parameters and re-extracted into 256 × 256 pixel images. 3D classification was performed requesting five classes without image alignment, using the refined map from CryoSPARC low-pass filtered to 60 Å as the initial model. Two out of five classes showed typical features of docked and extended conformations, accounting for 22% (48,757) and 26% (57,644) of the particles, respectively. These two classes were processed separately using the same approach. Specifically, per-particle Defocus-U and Defocus-V values were first determined in the local-fitting mode of Gctf-1.0.6. 3D refinement with C2 symmetry yielded the final map of the extended class at 7.9 Å. For the docked class, local CTF estimation yielded a map at 6.1 Å resolution and subsequent Bayesian polishing and CTF refinement with C2 symmetry further improved the map to 4.6 Å resolution.

We chose C2 symmetry in the analysis of GIRK1/4 images based on the empirical observation that it yielded a better map than refinement without symmetry. The resolution of the GIRK1/4 data precluded distinction between the GIRK1 and GIRK4 subunits; however, the improved refinement by application of C2 symmetry implies that these subunits might alternate in their positions around the pore’s central axis.

Model building and refinement

Request a detailed protocol

For the apo GIRK2 structure (extended conformation), models of the CTD and TMD region from the crystal structure of GIRK2 channel monomer without PIP2 (PDB: 3SYO) were placed into the density using UCSF Chimera (Pettersen et al., 2004). Then the two regions were manually connected in Coot and rounds of real-space refinement were performed in Phenix with secondary structure restraints (Adams et al., 2010). The refined channel monomer was then copied and fit into corresponding density of the other three subunits using the Jiggle-fit and chain-refine command of Coot 0.9 in the CCPEM suite (Burnley et al., 2017; Wood et al., 2015) to generate the channel tetramer. Finally, several iterative cycles of refinement using the phenix.real_space_refine in PHENIX with secondary structure and NCS restraints and manual adjustments in COOT yielded the final model for the apo structure of the GIRK2 channel.

For the structure of GIRK2 with PIP2 (docked conformation), models of channel monomer and the PIP2 molecule (PDB: 3SYA) were placed into density using UCSF Chimera (Pettersen et al., 2004) and several rounds of real-space refinement were performed in Phenix with secondary structure restraints (Adams et al., 2010). The channel tetramer was generated using Coot 0.9 in a similar manner to the apo GIRK2 structure. Finally, iterative refinement cycles using the phenix.real_space_refine in PHENIX with secondary structure and NCS restraints and manual adjustments in COOT yielded the final model for the docked conformation of GIRK2 channel with 4 PIP2 molecules bound.

Refinement statistics are summarized in Table 1. For model validation, the final model for each map was refined against one of the half maps (half map 1). FSC curves were then calculated between the refined model and half map 1 (work), half map 2 (free) as well as the combined full map. Local resolutions were estimated using Relion3 (Zivanov et al., 2018).

Structural analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Structural alignment and figures were made in UCSF Chimera (Pettersen et al., 2004) and PyMOL (www.pymol.org). Pore diameter between van der Waals surfaces for the extended and docked structures of the GIRK2 channel was calculated with Hole (www.holeprogram.org).

Data availability

The B-factor sharpened 3D cryo-EM density map and atomic coordinates of GIRK2 in the extended conformation (GIRK2Extended) and GIRK2 in the docked conformation with PIP2 (GIRK2Docked) have been deposited in the Worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB) under accession number EMD-22199 and 6XIS, EMD-22200 and 6XIT, respectively. The B-factor sharpened 3D cryo-EM density map of GIRK1/4 in the extended conformation (GIRK1/4Extended) and docked conformation with PIP2 (GIRK1/4Docked) have been deposited in the Worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB) under accession number EMD-22201 and EMD-22202, respectively.

The following data sets were generated
    1. Niu Y
    2. Tao X
    3. MacKinnon R
    (2020) RCSB Protein Data Bank
    ID 6XIT. Cryo-EM structure of the G protein-gated inward rectifier K+ channel GIRK2 (Kir3.2) in complex with PIP2.
    http://www.rcsb.org/structure/6XIT
    1. Niu Y
    2. Tao X
    3. MacKinnon R
    (2020) Electron Microscopy Data Bank
    ID EMD-22200. Cryo-EM structure of the G protein-gated inward rectifier K+ channel GIRK2 (Kir3.2) in complex with PIP2.
    https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/entry/emdb/EMD-22200
    1. Niu Y
    2. Tao X
    3. MacKinnon R
    (2020) RCSB Protein Data Bank
    ID 6XIS. Cryo-EM structure of the G protein-gated inward rectifier K+ channel GIRK2 (Kir3.2) in apo form.
    http://www.rcsb.org/structure/6XIS
    1. Niu Y
    2. Tao X
    3. MacKinnon R
    (2020) Electron Microscopy Data Bank
    ID EMD-22199. Cryo-EM structure of the G protein-gated inward rectifier K+ channel GIRK2 (Kir3.2) in apo form.
    https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/entry/emdb/EMD-22199
    1. Niu Y
    2. Tao X
    3. MacKinnon R
    (2020) Electron Microscopy Data Bank
    ID EMD-22201. Cryo-EM structure of the G protein-gated inward rectifier K+ channel GIRK1/4 (Kir3.1/Kir3.4) in apo form.
    https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/entry/emdb/EMD-22201
    1. Niu Y
    2. Tao X
    3. MacKinnon R
    (2020) Electron Microscopy Data Bank
    ID EMD-22202. Cryo-EM structure of the G protein-gated inward rectifier K+ channel GIRK1/4 (Kir3.1/Kir3.4) in complex with bound PIP2.
    https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/entry/emdb/EMD-22202

References

    1. Karschin C
    2. Dissmann E
    3. Stühmer W
    4. Karschin A
    (1996)
    IRK(1-3) and GIRK(1-4) inwardly rectifying K+ channel mRNAs are differentially expressed in the adult rat brain
    The Journal of Neuroscience 16:3559–3570.
  31. Book
    1. Stanfield PR
    2. Nakajima S
    3. Nakajima Y
    (2002) Constitutively active and G-protein coupled inward rectifier K+ channels: Kir2.0 and Kir3.0
    In: Cordat E, Barber D. L, editors. Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology. Springer. pp. 47–179.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0116431

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yiming Niu

    Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology and Biophysics, The Rockefeller University, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, New York, United States
    Contribution
    Data curation, Software, Validation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing
    Contributed equally with
    Xiao Tao
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5683-1781

  2. Xiao Tao

    Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology and Biophysics, The Rockefeller University, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, New York, United States
    Contribution
    Data curation, Software, Validation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing
    Contributed equally with
    Yiming Niu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9381-7903

  3. Kouki K Touhara

    Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology and Biophysics, The Rockefeller University, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, New York, United States
    Contribution
    Data curation, Methodology, Writing - review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3167-9784

  4. Roderick MacKinnon

    Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology and Biophysics, The Rockefeller University, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, New York, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing
    For correspondence
    mackinn@mail.rockefeller.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7605-4679

Funding

National Institutes of Health (GM43949)

  • Roderick MacKinnon

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Roderick MacKinnon

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank Mark Ebrahim and Johanna Sotiris at the Evelyn Gruss Lipper Cryo-EM Resource Center at Rockefeller University for assistance in data collection; Dr. Chia-Hsueh Lee (St. Jude Children's Research Hospital) for critical reading of the manuscript and suggestions for image analysis; Dr. Yixiao Zhang and Dr. Hiroshi Suzuki (Rockefeller University) for advice and help on data collection; Dr. Richard Hite (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center) for advice on the structural titration analysis; and members of the MacKinnon lab and Chen lab (Rockefeller University) for assistance. This work was supported in part by GM43949. RM is an investigator in the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Copyright

© 2020, Niu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,900
    views
  • 790
    downloads
  • 59
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yiming Niu
  2. Xiao Tao
  3. Kouki K Touhara
  4. Roderick MacKinnon
(2020)
Cryo-EM analysis of PIP2 regulation in mammalian GIRK channels
eLife 9:e60552.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60552

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60552

Categories and tags

Research organisms

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

    Unanticipated mechanisms of covalent inhibitor and synthetic ligand cobinding to PPARγ

    Jinsai Shang, Douglas J Kojetin
    Research Advance

    Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is a nuclear receptor transcription factor that regulates gene expression programs in response to ligand binding. Endogenous and synthetic ligands, including covalent antagonist inhibitors GW9662 and T0070907, are thought to compete for the orthosteric pocket in the ligand-binding domain (LBD). However, we previously showed that synthetic PPARγ ligands can cooperatively cobind with and reposition a bound endogenous orthosteric ligand to an alternate site, synergistically regulating PPARγ structure and function (Shang et al., 2018). Here, we reveal the structural mechanism of cobinding between a synthetic covalent antagonist inhibitor with other synthetic ligands. Biochemical and NMR data show that covalent inhibitors weaken—but do not prevent—the binding of other ligands via an allosteric mechanism, rather than direct ligand clashing, by shifting the LBD ensemble toward a transcriptionally repressive conformation, which structurally clashes with orthosteric ligand binding. Crystal structures reveal different cobinding mechanisms including alternate site binding to unexpectedly adopting an orthosteric binding mode by altering the covalent inhibitor binding pose. Our findings highlight the significant flexibility of the PPARγ orthosteric pocket, its ability to accommodate multiple ligands, and demonstrate that GW9662 and T0070907 should not be used as chemical tools to inhibit ligand binding to PPARγ.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

    Isobaric crosslinking mass spectrometry technology for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and complexes

    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

    Structure of scavenger receptor SCARF1 and its interaction with lipoproteins

    Yuanyuan Wang, Fan Xu ... Yongning He
    Research Article

    SCARF1 (scavenger receptor class F member 1, SREC-1 or SR-F1) is a type I transmembrane protein that recognizes multiple endogenous and exogenous ligands such as modified low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) and is important for maintaining homeostasis and immunity. But the structural information and the mechanisms of ligand recognition of SCARF1 are largely unavailable. Here, we solve the crystal structures of the N-terminal fragments of human SCARF1, which show that SCARF1 forms homodimers and its epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains adopt a long-curved conformation. Then, we examine the interactions of SCARF1 with lipoproteins and are able to identify a region on SCARF1 for recognizing modified LDLs. The mutagenesis data show that the positively charged residues in the region are crucial for the interaction of SCARF1 with modified LDLs, which is confirmed by making chimeric molecules of SCARF1 and SCARF2. In addition, teichoic acids, a cell wall polymer expressed on the surface of gram-positive bacteria, are able to inhibit the interactions of modified LDLs with SCARF1, suggesting the ligand binding sites of SCARF1 might be shared for some of its scavenging targets. Overall, these results provide mechanistic insights into SCARF1 and its interactions with the ligands, which are important for understanding its physiological roles in homeostasis and the related diseases.