1. Evolutionary Biology
Download icon

Telomeres: Change and HOAP for the best

  1. Claudia Castillo-González
  2. Dorothy E Shippen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, United States
Insight
  • Cited 0
  • Views 381
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2020;9:e64945 doi: 10.7554/eLife.64945

Abstract

HOAP is a telomere-binding protein that has a conserved role in Drosophila, but it also needs to evolve quickly to restrict telomeric retrotransposons.

Main text

Telomeres are specialized structures that ‘cap’ and protect the ends of linear chromosomes. They allow the cell to distinguish the ends of chromosomes from abnormal double-stranded breaks, and they protect the genetic information from being lost after replication (Barbero Barcenilla and Shippen, 2019). Losing telomeres leads to harmful anomalies, such as chromosomes fusing together: these structures are therefore conserved in all organisms with linear chromosomes, including (but not limited to) all animals, plants, insects and fungi (de Lange, 2018).

Telomeres are formed of dedicated protein complexes and sequences of repetitive DNA elements; these are tightly compacted into heterochromatin and therefore more difficult to transcribe. In Drosophila species, telomeres consist of a specialized type of genetic elements known as the HTT-array, which is then capped with a terminin complex that includes the proteins HOAP and HipHop (Casacuberta, 2017; Pardue and DeBaryshe, 2008). In fact, loss of terminin is lethal at the embryonic stage due to catastrophic chromosome fusions (Cenci et al., 2003; Mlotshwa et al., 2010). In addition, the DNA in Drosophila telomeres is wrapped around proteins decorated with a specific mark recognized by Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1 for short) to ensure that they remain in their compacted form. HP1 is also part of the telomere cap, as it directly interacts with HOAP and HipHop.

The HTT-array consists of ‘parasitic’ DNA sequences known as retrotransposons, which, when transcribed, can ultimately ‘copy and paste’ themselves into different regions in the genome. This ability plays a key role in lengthening and maintaining telomeres, as HTTs typically get inserted at chromosome-ends (Casacuberta, 2017), but they can also cause genome instability if these sequences replicate without control. Remarkably, when expressed, some HTT transcripts are processed into small RNAs that direct a silencing complex known as piRISC, which severs HTT transcripts, limiting their expression (Akkouche et al., 2017). In addition, piRISC guides the deposition of the genetic marks that help recruit HP1 and compact chromatin, also reducing the transcription of the retrotransposons (Sato and Siomi, 2018). In fact, loss of heterochromatin results in over-proliferation of retrotransposons and telomere deregulation (Akkouche et al., 2017; Khurana et al., 2010; Perrini et al., 2004; Radion et al., 2018).

Given the critical role of telomeres, it is intriguing that flies have evolved a protective mechanism that involves parasitic elements and factors like HOAP and HipHop, which are two of the fastest evolving proteins in Drosophila (Saint-Leandre and Levine, 2020). How can conserved functions be fulfilled by an ever-changing molecular machinery? Now, in eLife, Bastien Saint-Leandre, Courtney Christopher and Mia Levine, from the University of Pennsylvania, report that HOAP performs more than one function, which is why it needs to evolve fast (Saint-Leandre et al., 2020).

First, Saint-Leandre et al. analyzed the sequences of the cav gene, which encodes HOAP, in different Drosophila species. This revealed that advantageous mutations of the protein were being selected for, a hallmark of adaptive evolution. CRISPR/Cas9 technology was harnessed to generate mutant D. melanogaster flies with the gene from another Drosophila species, D. yakuba; D. melanogaster flies with a tagged version of the native HOAP (HOAP[mel]) served as a control. Flies expressing the D. yakuba version of HOAP (HOAP[yak]) were viable, confirming that the essential role of HOAP was conserved between species despite the two proteins having diverging sequences.

Next, Saint-Leandre et al. followed the phenotypes of telomeres in the engineered D. melanogaster flies expressing HOAP[yak] through fifty generations. This revealed that, in D. melanogaster, both versions of the HOAP protein protected telomere ends, but only HOAP[mel] regulated HTT expression and telomere length. The telomeres in flies carrying the D. yakuba variant did not have the genetic marks recognized by HP1 and recruited much less of this protein. Additionally, these insects accumulated less piRISC, despite the expression of the HTT-array being upregulated (Figure 1). This observation is consistent with previous studies showing that depleting telomeres of piRISC produces abnormal telomeric chromatin (Akkouche et al., 2017; Radion et al., 2018). Strikingly, HTT overexpression in flies expressing HOAP[yak] resulted in the array inserting itself outside telomeres, potentially disrupting essential genes. Indeed, these females produced fewer progeny over their lifetime than those expressing the native HOAP[mel]. This fitness cost is consistent with catastrophic genome damage.

Comparison of telomere phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster flies expressing HOAP from either D. melanogaster (HOAP[mel]) or D. yakuba (HOAP[yak]).

Left: the telomeres of a D. melanogaster fly expressing HOAP[mel]. The complex formed by HOAP[mel] (green), HipHop (maroon) and HP1 (dark orange) binds the telomere. Bi-directional transcription of the HTT-array produces both full-length transcripts (dark blue lines) and shorter transcripts (bright pink lines) that bind the protein Piwi (light pink) to form piRISC. This complex drives the degradation of the full-length HTT transcripts to prevent retrotransposons from being inserted into other regions of the chromosome. Additionally, piRISC guides the deposition of silencing marks (dark green circles) which serve to recruit HP1 to the telomeres. This leads to chromatin compaction, reducing HTT-array transcription and providing a second layer of control over the retrotransposons. The complex formed by HOAP, HipHop and HP1 also binds to terminin (purple) to cap and protect the chromosome end. Right: telomeres of a D. melanogaster fly expressing the cav gene from D. yakuba, HOAP[yak]. While HOAP[yak] (light blue) can bind to HipHop and HP1 and bind terminin to effectively cap the chromosome ends, it fails to perform the roles of the native HOAP in regulating the HTT-array. This means that the telomeres of flies expressing HOAP[yak] have lower levels of HP1 and do not have silencing marks to aid in the compaction of chromatin. Consequently, chromatin becomes relaxed, increasing the transcription of the HTT-array. The full-length transcripts of the retrotransposons that are produced are not degraded because these telomeres do not support the accumulation piRISC. This accelerates retrotransposon replication, initially elongating the telomeres, but then allowing the elements to travel to other regions of the chromosome, potentially disrupting other genes (figure created using BioRender.com).

These results show that telomere-capping and HTT regulation are two independent functions converging in HOAP, and that while telomere-capping is essential and must be conserved, HTT regulation is not. Coupled with evidence that the D. melanogaster and D. yakuba genes have undergone adaptive evolution since their divergence, this indicates that it is HOAP’s role in regulating the HTT-array that requires fast evolution. This is potentially in response to the HTT-array constantly adapting to escape control.

The work by Saint-Leandre et al. resolves the apparent paradox of a fast-evolving protein being responsible for an essential and strictly conserved role. It also predicts that HOAP, HipHop and HP1 participate in two independent complexes for telomere function: one which involves terminin and protects the ends of the chromosomes, and a second that demands constant innovation to contain the genetic parasitic elements that form telomeres. Understanding how retrotransposons are contained by this second complex and why females are more susceptible to dysregulation of HTT are two fascinating mysteries for future investigation.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Claudia Castillo-González

    Claudia Castillo-González is in the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6250-4317
  2. Dorothy E Shippen

    Dorothy E Shippen is in the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States

    For correspondence
    dshippen@tamu.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0562-2047

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: December 22, 2020 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2020, Castillo-González and Shippen

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 381
    Page views
  • 45
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Gabriela Santos-Rodriguez et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Many primate genes produce circular RNAs (circRNAs). However, the extent of circRNA conservation between closely related species remains unclear. By comparing tissue-specific transcriptomes across over 70 million years of primate evolution, we identify that within 3 million years circRNA expression profiles diverged such that they are more related to species identity than organ type. However, our analysis also revealed a subset of circRNAs with conserved neural expression across tens of millions of years of evolution. By comparing to species-specific circRNAs, we identified that the downstream intron of the conserved circRNAs display a dramatic lengthening during evolution due to the insertion of novel retrotransposons. Our work provides comparative analyses of the mechanisms promoting circRNAs to generate increased transcriptomic complexity in primates.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Franziska Gruhl et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are found across eukaryotes and can function in post-transcriptional gene regulation. Their biogenesis through a circle-forming backsplicing reaction is facilitated by reverse-complementary repetitive sequences promoting pre-mRNA folding. Orthologous genes from which circRNAs arise, overall contain more strongly conserved splice sites and exons than other genes, yet it remains unclear to what extent this conservation reflects purifying selection acting on the circRNAs themselves. Our analyses of circRNA repertoires from five species representing three mammalian lineages (marsupials, eutherians: rodents, primates) reveal that surprisingly few circRNAs arise from orthologous exonic loci across all species. Even the circRNAs from orthologous loci are associated with young, recently active and species-specific transposable elements, rather than with common, ancient transposon integration events. These observations suggest that many circRNAs emerged convergently during evolution – as a byproduct of splicing in orthologs prone to transposon insertion. Overall, our findings argue against widespread functional circRNA conservation.