HIV-1 Infection: You can keep your coat on
High-resolution imaging techniques reveal new insights into the actions of the retrovirus HIV-1 inside host cells.
- Department of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, United States
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, United States
Viruses are pathogens that rely on hosts to produce multiple copies of themselves. Retroviruses, such as HIV-1, have a unique way of integrating their genes into the DNA of a host cell. Since their genetic information is stored as RNA, a retrovirus must first undergo a process called reverse transcription. This process, which is catalyzed by an enzyme called reverse transcriptase, is followed by a second step called integration (catalyzed by integrase), which results in the viral DNA being inserted into the genome of the host cell. Although the mechanical functions of these two enzymes are well understood, relatively little is known about the transition between reverse transcription and integration during HIV-1 infection.
Much of the research into these processes has centered on the capsid protein, which self-associates to form a honeycomb-like container that surrounds the genetic material inside the retrovirus (Bedwell and Engelman, 2021). Once the retrovirus has entered a cell, the capsid container protects the RNA and the two enzymes from the antiviral molecular machinery in the cell cytoplasm, allowing reverse transcription to proceed without interruption (Yamashita and Engelman, 2017). At the same time, various cellular proteins bind to the outside of the capsid in order to facilitate it being trafficked to the nucleus, where the DNA of the host cell resides.
Once reverse transcription has been completed, the capsid is degraded to release the viral DNA from its protective container. Until recently, it was assumed that this process – which is called uncoating – might be a prerequisite for the viral DNA to enter the nucleus because it was thought that the HIV-1 capsid was too large to pass through the nuclear pore complex (which is the doorway through which biomolecules pass to enter the nucleus; Yamashita and Engelman, 2017; Arhel et al., 2007; Francis and Melikyan, 2018). However, recent studies have found evidence for capsid lattices or intact capsid-like structures inside the nucleus (Burdick et al., 2020; Dharan et al., 2020; Selyutina et al., 2020), with one study even suggesting that the intact capsid is able to pass through the nuclear pore complex (Zila et al., 2021; Figure 1). Now, in eLife, Hans-Georg Kräusslich and colleagues at the University Hospital Heidelberg and the German Center for Infection Research – including Thorsten Müller as first author – report new details on the timing, localization and mechanism of HIV-1 uncoating (Müller et al., 2021).
Figure 1
HIV-1 inside a host cell.
After HIV-1 has reached the cytoplasm of the host cell (1), reverse transcription begins within the virus capsid, which is still intact: viral RNA in shown in blue, and the newly synthesized viral DNA is shown in red. Reverse transcription continues as the capsid passes through the nuclear pore complex (2) and into the nucleus (3). Once the process of reverse transcription has been completed, the forces exerted by the double-stranded DNA (double red lines) compromise the structural integrity of the capsid, creating a gap through which the DNA can escape (4) and go on to be integrated in the DNA of the host cell (not shown). The breakdown of the capsid and release of the DNA is referred to as uncoating. Integration occurs in chromatin (solid black line) near nuclear speckles (speckle-associated domains) and away from nuclear lamina (lamina-associated domains). It is currently unclear if there are similar preferred sites for uncoating.
Müller et al. used different fluorescent labels to identify distinct events during HIV-1 replication. The ANCHOR labeling system – which employs a fluorescently labeled bacterial protein to bind a specific DNA sequence engineered into the HIV-1 genome – enabled them to distinguish between the initial reverse-transcription products made comparatively early during infection, and the more complete, double-stranded DNA that is accessible only after uncoating has happened. Müller et al. also tagged the incoming virus with a fluorescently labeled integrase protein in order to study the kinetics of uncoating. These experiments revealed that complete viral DNA was mostly tagged after nuclear import, suggesting that the capsid remained intact as it entered the nucleus, and that uncoating took place thereafter. Moreover, uncoating began in the nucleus as early as eight hours after infection with HIV-1 (Figure 1).
These observations suggest little – if any – loss of the capsid protein prior to nuclear import. Consistent with this interpretation, high-resolution imaging techniques revealed intact capsid-like structures at sites close to ANCHOR-labeled viral DNA. Tomographic reconstructions of these structures provided a unique snapshot of the HIV-1 uncoating process, showing what appeared to be holes in capsid-like structures that did not contain viral DNA. This quite striking finding is consistent with a previous model of uncoating in which reverse transcription leads to the generation of mechanical forces that compromise the structural integrity of the capsid (Figure 1; Rankovic et al., 2017). In many ways, the capsid is like an egg from which the integration-competent viral DNA is hatched!
The work of Müller et al. fills in some of the gaps in our understanding of the early stages of HIV-1 replication. We now have a clearer picture of how and when the final integration-competent complex can be released from the capsid shell. An important next step will be to unravel the link between uncoating and integration.
In recent years, it has become clear that integration tends to take place at chromatin regions that are close to structures called nuclear speckles and away from the nuclear lamina (Figure 1; Bedwell and Engelman, 2021). It is possible, perhaps even likely, that uncoating also occurs at or near these same chromatin regions. Alternatively, a post-uncoating trafficking event might help guide the integration complex to these regions. A theory that can link reverse transcription, uncoating and integration will clarify the paths taken during HIV-1 infection which, in turn, could inform the development of new antiviral strategies.
References
-
Factors that mold the nuclear landscape of HIV-1 integrationNucleic Acids Research 49:621–635.https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1207
-
Reverse transcription mechanically initiates HIV-1 capsid disassemblyJournal of Virology 91:e00289.https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00289-17
-
Capsid-dependent host factors in HIV-1 infectionTrends in Microbiology 25:741–755.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2017.04.004
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2021, Bedwell and Engelman
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 836
- views
-
- 69
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
HIV-1 Infection: You can keep your coat on
eLife 10:e69887.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69887
Further reading
-
- Cancer Biology
- Cell Biology
PML, a multifunctional protein, is crucial for forming PML-nuclear bodies involved in stress responses. Under specific conditions, PML associates with nucleolar caps formed after RNA polymerase I (RNAPI) inhibition, leading to PML-nucleolar associations (PNAs). This study investigates PNAs-inducing stimuli by exposing cells to various genotoxic stresses. We found that the most potent inducers of PNAs introduced topological stress and inhibited RNAPI. Doxorubicin, the most effective compound, induced double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the rDNA locus. PNAs co-localized with damaged rDNA, segregating it from active nucleoli. Cleaving the rDNA locus with I-PpoI confirmed rDNA damage as a genuine stimulus for PNAs. Inhibition of ATM, ATR kinases, and RAD51 reduced I-PpoI-induced PNAs, highlighting the importance of ATM/ATR-dependent nucleolar cap formation and homologous recombination (HR) in their triggering. I-PpoI-induced PNAs co-localized with rDNA DSBs positive for RPA32-pS33 but deficient in RAD51, indicating resected DNA unable to complete HR repair. Our findings suggest that PNAs form in response to persistent rDNA damage within the nucleolar cap, highlighting the interplay between PML/PNAs and rDNA alterations due to topological stress, RNAPI inhibition, and rDNA DSBs destined for HR. Cells with persistent PNAs undergo senescence, suggesting PNAs help avoid rDNA instability, with implications for tumorigenesis and aging.
-
- Cell Biology
Aggregation of mutant forms of Huntingtin is the underlying feature of neurodegeneration observed in Huntington's disorder. In addition to neurons, cellular processes in non-neuronal cell types are also shown to be affected. Cells expressing neurodegeneration-associated mutant proteins show altered uptake of ligands, suggestive of impaired endocytosis, in a manner as yet unknown. Using live cell imaging, we show that clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) is affected in Drosophila hemocytes and mammalian cells containing Huntingtin aggregates. This is also accompanied by alterations in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton resulting in increased cellular stiffness. Further, we find that Huntingtin aggregates sequester actin and actin-modifying proteins. Overexpression of Hip1 or Arp3 (actin-interacting proteins) could restore CME and cellular stiffness in cells containing Huntingtin aggregates. Neurodegeneration driven by pathogenic Huntingtin was also rescued upon overexpression of either Hip1 or Arp3 in Drosophila. Examination of other pathogenic aggregates revealed that TDP-43 also displayed defective CME, altered actin organization and increased stiffness, similar to pathogenic Huntingtin. Together, our results point to an intimate connection between dysfunctional CME, actin misorganization and increased cellular stiffness caused by alteration in the local intracellular environment by pathogenic aggregates.
