Cancer Immunotherapy: A promising platform for predicting toxicity
Organ-on-chip approaches could help researchers to better predict the toxicity of cancer immunotherapy drugs.
- Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland
Killing cancer cells can be done directly or by harnessing the immune system through an approach called cancer immunotherapy (Robert, 2020). Indeed, over the past decade, most of the advances in oncology have involved boosting immune cells to destroy tumor cells. Some of these treatments have resulted in impressive improvements in survival, bringing the possibility of a cure closer for some patients (Robert et al., 2018). This is a big milestone in oncology.
Despite these advances, immunotherapies can be associated with toxicity, which forces the treatment to be stopped: if immune cells become too activated, they can mistakenly recognize and destroy healthy tissues. This can lead, for example, to rashes, hepatitis or colitis depending on whether the skin, liver or gut are attacked (Marin-Acevedo et al., 2019).
A big challenge in oncology is therefore to predict which new immunotherapy drugs are going to be too harmful for patients. This is usually examined in animal models, but since their immune systems differ from the human immune system, it can be difficult to reliably predict toxicity (Zschaler et al., 2014). Now, in eLife, Nikolce Gjorevski (Roche), Lauriane Cabon (Roche) and colleagues – including Jordan Kerns and Chaitra Belgur of Emulate Inc in Boston as joint first authors – report how an in vitro model can help bypass this problem for T cell bispecific antibodies immunotherapy (Kerns et al., 2021).
T cell bispecific antibodies (or TCBs) can recognise and bind to ‘antigen’ proteins present on the surface of tumors, as well as receptors displayed by immune ‘T cells’: by bringing the two types of cells closer, this process helps to activate T cells and allows them to kill their targets. However, the antigens that TCBs bind to are not always exclusive to cancer cells. Recognition of non-cancer cells which share antigens with tumors – known as the on-target, off-tumor effect – can lead to normal cells being damaged (Labrijn et al., 2019; Figure 1). Predicting which TCBs under clinical development will cause such undesired toxicity represents an important challenge in oncology.
Figure 1
Testing drug toxicity using an organ-on-chip platform.
Administering TCBs to an organ-on-chip platform (such as a model of the lung or intestine) allows the antibodies (Y-shaped structures) to recognize antigens (shown in yellow and blue) present in both healthy epithelial and cancerous cells. This brings T cells close to their targets and also activates them, which can lead to healthy cells being damaged (as assessed by measuring cell death and inflammation levels). This model is able to partially reproduce toxicity observed in animals and humans.
Image credit: Image was prepared with Servier Medical Art (CC BY 3.0).
To address this issue, Kerns et al. first took advantage of a lung-on-chip model (Huh et al., 2010) – a system grown under conditions mimicking those found in the body – to predict toxicity to TCBs. This ‘mini-organ’ was exposed to a TCB that recognises an antigen present in ovarian, lung and breast cancer cells, but which can also be expressed, at lower levels, in healthy lung cells. This manipulation led to healthy cells being damaged in the lung-on-chip model, which was then used to determine which TCB dose could kill tumors while sparing normal lung cells. This dose was then administered to mouse models, whose lungs remained undamaged. This demonstrates that the lung-on-chip was able to efficiently predict toxicity in these animals.
Kerns et al. then used an intestine-on-chip model to test a TCB which targets an antigen present on both colon cancer and normal intestine cells. Healthy cells survived the treatment but signs of toxicity emerged that could mimick side-effects that commonly occur in patients, such as increased inflammation.
Using an organ-on-chip model to test TCBs therefore has two main advantages. First, it reproduces toxicity observed in vivo, and can help to determine which doses are effective while remaining safe for normal cells. Second, it serves to predict toxicity before patients are administered with newly-developed TCBs, filling the gap between animal and human studies for drugs that are yet to be clinically tested. Organ-on-chip models could therefore make drug development more efficient by helping to screen out toxic TCBs before they reach cancer patients.
References
-
Bispecific antibodies: a mechanistic review of the pipelineNature Reviews Drug Discovery 18:585–608.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-019-0028-1
-
Immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicitiesMayo Clinic Proceedings 94:1321–1329.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.03.012
-
Durable complete response after discontinuation of pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic melanomaJournal of Clinical Oncology 36:1668–1674.https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.6270
-
A decade of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapyNature Communications 11:3801.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17670-y
-
Differences in innate immune response between man and mouseCritical Reviews in Immunology 34:433–454.https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevImmunol.2014011600
Article and author information
Author details
Maria Ochoa de Olza
Publication history
- Version of Record published: September 24, 2021 (version 1)
Copyright
© 2021, Ochoa de Olza
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 852
- views
-
- 63
- downloads
-
- 2
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Cancer Immunotherapy: A promising platform for predicting toxicity
eLife 10:e73191.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73191
Further reading
-
- Cancer Biology
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) directed against MET have been recently approved to treat advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring activating MET mutations. This success is the consequence of a long characterization of MET mutations in cancers, which we propose to outline in this review. MET, a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), displays in a broad panel of cancers many deregulations liable to promote tumour progression. The first MET mutation was discovered in 1997, in hereditary papillary renal cancer (HPRC), providing the first direct link between MET mutations and cancer development. As in other RTKs, these mutations are located in the kinase domain, leading in most cases to ligand-independent MET activation. In 2014, novel MET mutations were identified in several advanced cancers, including lung cancers. These mutations alter splice sites of exon 14, causing in-frame exon 14 skipping and deletion of a regulatory domain. Because these mutations are not located in the kinase domain, they are original and their mode of action has yet to be fully elucidated. Less than five years after the discovery of such mutations, the efficacy of a MET TKI was evidenced in NSCLC patients displaying MET exon 14 skipping. Yet its use led to a resistance mechanism involving acquisition of novel and already characterized MET mutations. Furthermore, novel somatic MET mutations are constantly being discovered. The challenge is no longer to identify them but to characterize them in order to predict their transforming activity and their sensitivity or resistance to MET TKIs, in order to adapt treatment.
-
- Cancer Biology
- Genetics and Genomics
Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is highly aggressive and often treatment refractory. We analyzed previously published AML relapse cohorts and found that 40% of relapses occur without changes in driver mutations, suggesting that non-genetic mechanisms drive relapse in a large proportion of cases. We therefore characterized epigenetic patterns of AML relapse using 26 matched diagnosis-relapse samples with ATAC-seq. This analysis identified a relapse-specific chromatin accessibility signature for mutationally stable AML, suggesting that AML undergoes epigenetic evolution at relapse independent of mutational changes. Analysis of leukemia stem cell (LSC) chromatin changes at relapse indicated that this leukemic compartment underwent significantly less epigenetic evolution than non-LSCs, while epigenetic changes in non-LSCs reflected overall evolution of the bulk leukemia. Finally, we used single-cell ATAC-seq paired with mitochondrial sequencing (mtscATAC) to map clones from diagnosis into relapse along with their epigenetic features. We found that distinct mitochondrially-defined clones exhibit more similar chromatin accessibility at relapse relative to diagnosis, demonstrating convergent epigenetic evolution in relapsed AML. These results demonstrate that epigenetic evolution is a feature of relapsed AML and that convergent epigenetic evolution can occur following treatment with induction chemotherapy.
