Throughout development, how do brains gain the ability to perform advanced computation? Given that the distributed computations carried out by brains require an intrinsic information processing capacity, it is of utmost importance to decipher the nature of the emergence of this capacity during development.

For brains to engage in the computations required for specific tasks, they require a general-purpose computational capacity. This capacity is often studied within the framework of information dynamics, where it is decomposed into the atomic operations of information storage, transfer, and modification (Lizier et al., 2014; Lizier, 2013). We are particularly interested in the information flow component, which is measured using the transfer entropy (TE) (Schreiber, 2000; Bossomaier et al., 2016). There exists a substantial body of work examining the structure and role of computational capacity in terms of these operations in mature brains. This includes the complex, dynamic, structure of information transfer revealed by calcium imaging (Orlandi et al., 2014), fMRI (Mäki-Marttunen et al., 2013; Lizier et al., 2011), MEG (Wibral et al., 2011), and EEG (Shovon et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2015; Stramaglia et al., 2012; Marinazzo et al., 2014a), and the role of information storage in representing visual stimuli (Wibral et al., 2014a), among others.

Given the established role of information flows in enabling the computations carried out by mature brains, we aim to study how they self-organise during neural development. There are a number of requirements for such a study. Firstly, it needs to be performed at a fine spatial scale (close to the order of individual neurons) to capture the details of development. It also needs to be conducted longitudinally in order to track changes over developmental timescales. Finally, the estimation of the information flow as measured by TE needs to be performed with a technique which is both accurate and able to capture the subtleties of computations performed on both fine and large timescales simultaneously.

Considering the first requirement of fine spatial scale, cell cultures plated over multi-electrode arrays (MEAs) allow us to record from individual neurons in a single network, providing us with this fine spatial resolution. There have been a number of previous studies examining information flows in neural cell cultures, for example, Nigam et al., 2016; Shimono and Beggs, 2015; Matsuda et al., 2013; Timme et al., 2014; Kajiwara et al., 2021; Timme et al., 2016; Wibral et al., 2017. Such work has focussed on the directed functional networks implied by the estimated TE values between pairs of nodes, which has revealed interesting features of the information flow structure. See section ‘Previous application of the discrete-time estimator’ for a more detailed description of this previous work.

However, moving to our second requirement of a longitudinal study, these studies have almost exclusively examined only single points in neural development since nearly all of them examined recordings from slice cultures of mature networks. By contrast, we aim to study the information flows longitudinally by estimating them at different stages in development. Using recordings from developing cultures of dissociated neurons (Wagenaar et al., 2006b) makes this possible.

In terms of our third requirement of accurate and high-fidelity estimation of TE, we note that all previous studies of information flows in neural cell cultures made use of the traditional discrete-time estimator of TE. As recently demonstrated (Shorten et al., 2021), the use of this estimator is problematic as it can only capture effects occurring on a single timescale. In contrast, a novel continuous-time TE estimator (Shorten et al., 2021) captures effects on multiple scales, avoiding time binning, is data efficient, and consistent. See section ‘Transfer entropy estimation’ for a more detailed discussion of the differences between the continuous-time and discrete-time estimators.

In this article, we thus examine the development of neural information flows for the first time, addressing the above requirements by applying the continuous-time TE estimator to recordings of developing dissociated cultures. We find that the amount of information flowing over these cultures undergoes a dramatic increase throughout development and that the patterns of these flows tend to be established when the flows arise. During bursting periods, we find that nodes often engage in specialised computational roles as either transmitters, receivers, or mediators of information flow. Moreover, these roles usually correspond with the node’s mean position in the burst propagation, with middle bursters tending to be information mediators. This provides positive evidence for the pre-existing conjecture that nodes in the middle of the burst propagation play the vital computational role of ‘brokers of neuronal communication’ (Schroeter et al., 2015). Intriguingly, the designation of computational roles (transmitter, receiver, or mediator) appears to also be determined early when the information flows are established. Finally, in order to investigate the generality of these phenomena, as well as a putative mechanism for their emergence, we study the dynamics of information flow in a model network developing according to a spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) (Caporale and Dan, 2008) update rule. We find that the abovementioned phenomena are present in this model system, hinting at the broader generality of such patterns of information flow in neural development.

Data from overnight recordings of developing cultures of dissociated cortical rat neurons at various stages of development (designated by days in vitro [DIV]) was analysed. These recordings are part of an open, freely available, dataset (Wagenaar et al., 2006b; Network, 2021). See ‘Materials and methods’ (section ‘Cell culture data’) for a summary of the setup that produced the recordings. We studied all cultures for which there were overnight recordings. We restricted our analysis to these overnight recordings as they provided sufficient data for the estimation of TE. In what follows, we refer to the cultures by the same naming convention used in the open dataset: 1-1 through 1-5 and 2-1 through 2-6. The majority of cultures have recordings at three different time points, three have recordings at four points (1-3, 2-2, and 2-5) and one has only two recordings (2-1). The days on which these recordings took place vary between the 4th and 33rd DIV. By contrasting the TE values estimated at these different recording days, we are able to obtain snapshots of the emergence of these culture’s computational capacity.

In the analysis that follows, for space considerations, we show plots for four representative cultures: 1-1, 1-3, 2-2, and 2-5. The latter three were chosen as they were the only cultures with four recording days. Culture 1-1 was selected from the group with three recording days, having the latest final recording day that was no more than a week later than the penultimate recording day. Plots for the remaining cultures are shown in Appendix 3. We also display certain summary statistics for the results of all cultures in the main text. Culture 1-5 is anomalous (among the recordings studied in this work) in that on its final day it has ceased to burst regularly, as stated in Figure 3A of Wagenaar et al., 2006b. This leads to its results being substantially different from those of the other cultures, as will be presented below.

The TE between all pairs of electrodes was estimated using a recently introduced continuous-time estimator (Shorten et al., 2021; see section ‘Transfer entropy estimation’). This produces a directed functional network at each recording day, and we aim to analyse how the connections in this network change over development time. Spike sorting was not performed because we would not be able to match the resulting neural units across different recordings and could not then fulfil our aim of contrasting the information flow between specific source-target pairs at different recording days. As such, the activity on each node in the directed functional networks we study is multi-unit activity (MUA) (Schroeter et al., 2015) formed of the spikes from all neurons detected by a given electrode, with connections representing information flows in the MUA. For more details on data preprocessing as well as the parameters used with the estimator, see ‘Materials and methods’.

The dramatic increase in the flow of information during development

We first investigate how the amount of information flowing between the nodes changes over the lifespan of the cultures. Table 1 shows the mean TE between all source-target pairs (Appendix 3—table 1 shows these values for the additional cultures). We observe that this mean value increases monotonically with the number of DIV, with only a single exception in the main cultures (a slight drop in the mean TE between days 21 and 33 of culture 2-2). We can make the same observation for the additional cultures, where the only drop is caused by day 5 of culture 2-4, a day still very early in development which had no significant TE values. We performed a two-sided Student’s t-test for the difference in the mean between all pairs of recordings for each culture. All such differences (increases and decreases) were found to be statistically significant at ${\displaystyle \mathrm{p}<0.01}$ with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.

Table 1

Culture 1-1	Day 4	Day 14	Day 20
	0	0.060	0.097
Culture 1-3	Day 5	Day 10	Day 16	Day 24
	0	2×10–4	0.017	0.098
Culture 2-2	Day 9	Day 15	Day 21	Day 33
	0	0.015	0.11	0.057
Culture 2-5	Day 4	Day 10	Day 22	Day 28
	0	2×10–3	0.037	0.082

Overall, the magnitude of the increase in the mean TE is substantial. All the first recordings for the main cultures had a mean estimated TE of $0\mathrm{nats}\text{.}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ (with no statistically significant transfer entropies measured as per section ‘The emergence of functional information flow networks’). By contrast, all recordings beyond 20 DIV had a mean TE greater than $0.037\mathrm{nats}\text{.}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$.

Figure 1 shows scatter plots of the TE values in each recording laid over box-and-whisker plots (Appendix 3—figure 1 shows equivalent plots for the additional cultures). The large increase over time in the amount of information flowing over the networks is clearly visible in these plots. However, it is interesting to note that certain source-target pairs do have large information flows between them on early recording days even while the average remains very low.

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

Figure 1b shows histograms of the TE values estimated in each recording along with probability densities estimated using a Gaussian kernel (Appendix 3—figure 1 shows these for the additional runs). The distributions only include the nonzero (statistically significant) estimated TE values. Some of these distributions do, qualitatively, appear to be log-normal, in particular for later DIV. Moreover, previous studies have placed an emphasis on the observation of log-normal distributions of TE values in in vitro cultures of neurons (Shimono and Beggs, 2015; Nigam et al., 2016). As such, we quantitatively analysed the distribution of the nonzero (statistically significant) estimated TE values in each individual recording. However, contrary to expectations, we found that these values were not well described by a log-normal distribution. It is worth noting that previous work which analysed the distribution of TE values in networks of spiking neurons was performed on organotypic cultures, as opposed to the dissociated cultures studied in this work. See Appendix 1 for further details and discussion.

The emergence of functional information flow networks

By considering each electrode as a node in a network, we can construct directed functional networks of information flow by assigning a directed edge between each source-target pair of electrodes with a statistically significant information flow. This results in weighted directed networks, the weight being provided by the TE value. Diagrams of these networks for the main cultures are shown in Figure 2, and in Appendix 3—figure 3 for the additional cultures. Note that, in all subsequent analysis presented in this article, a TE value of zero was assigned to all cases where the TE was not statistically significant.

Figure 2

Download asset Open asset

We are able to notice a number of interesting spatiotemporal patterns in these diagrams. Firstly, the density (number of edges) of the networks increases over time. This is quantified in Table 2, which shows the number of source-target pairs of electrodes for which a statistically significant nonzero TE value was estimated. In all the main cultures studied, the number of such pairs (and, therefore, the network density) increased by orders of magnitude over the life of the culture. For instance, in all four cultures, no statistically significant TE values are estimated on the first recording day. However, over 1000 source-target pairs have significant TE values between them on the final day of recording for each culture. Appendix 3—table 2 shows the same values for the additional cultures. With a few exceptions (such as the abovementioned anomalous culture 1-5), the same relationship is observed. Note that the final recording day for culture 2-4 is relatively early (day 11), and so the low number of significant edges on this day is consistent with the other cultures.

Table 2

Culture 1-1	Day 4	Day 14	Day 20
	0	607	2166
Culture 1-3	Day 5	Day 10	Day 16	Day 24
	0	44	999	1902
Culture 2-2	Day 9	Day 15	Day 21	Day 33
	0	371	1409	1386
Culture 2-5	Day 4	Day 10	Day 22	Day 28
	0	185	975	1263

We are, therefore, observing the networks moving from a state where no nodes are exchanging information, to one in which information is being transferred between a substantial proportion of the pairs of nodes (≈30% density of possible directed connections in most networks). Put another way, the functional networks are emerging from an unconnected state to a highly connected state containing the information flow structure that underpins the computational capacity of the network. This helps to explain the overall increase in information flow across the network reported in section ‘The dramatic increase in the flow of information during development’.

We observe that the information flow (both incoming and outgoing) is spread somewhat evenly over the networks – in the sense that in the later, highly connected, recordings there are very few areas with neither incoming nor outgoing flow (the one notable exception to this is culture 2-6). A number of clear hubs (with particularly high either outgoing or incoming information flow) do stand out against this strong background information flow however. The strongest such hubs (with many high-TE edges) are all information sinks: they have low outgoing information flow, but receive high flow from a number of other nodes.

One can observe many instances in these diagrams where nodes have either very high incoming flow and very low outgoing flow, or very low incoming flow and very high outgoing flow. That is, they are taking on the roles of source (information-transmitting) hubs or target (information-receiving) hubs. Notable instances of information-receiving hubs include node 49 of day 16 of culture 1-3, node 42 of day 22 of culture 2-5, and node 5 of day 15 of culture 2-2 (see Figure 2 for the node numbers used here). Notable examples of information transmitting hubs include node 28 of day 10 of culture 1-3 and nodes 18, 19, 22, and 30 of day 22 of culture 2-5. The specialist computational roles that nodes can take on will be studied in more detail quantitatively in section ‘Information flows quantify computational role of burst position’, with a particular focus on how this relates to the burst propagation.

It is possible to observe some notable instances whereby the information processing properties of a node remain remarkably similar across recording days. For example, nodes 55, 50, and 39 of culture 2-2 are outgoing hubs (with almost no incoming TE) on all four recording days. This offers us a tantalising hint that the information processing structure of these networks might be locked-in early in development, being reinforced as time progresses. Section ‘Early lock-in of information flows’ performs a quantitative analysis of this hypothesis.

Early lock-in of information flows

In the previous subsection, analysis of the directed functional networks of information flow suggested that the structure of the information processing capacity of the developing networks might be determined early in development and reinforced during the subsequent neuronal maturation.

In order to quantitatively investigate this hypothesis, we examine the relationships in the information flow from a given source to a given target between different recording days. That is, we are probing whether the amount of information flowing between a source and a target on an early day of development will be correlated with the amount flowing on a later day of development. This is equivalent to studying the correlation in the weights of the edges of the functional networks across different recording days. Figure 3 shows scatter plots between the TE values estimated between each source-target pair on earlier and later days. Note that, in every case where the null hypothesis of zero TE could not be rejected (the TE was not statistically significant), a value of zero was used. Days with fewer than 10 nonzero values were excluded from the analysis as they could not lead to meaningful insights. By observing the pair scatters in Figure 3a–d (equivalent plots for the additional cultures are shown in Appendix 3—figure 4), we see that, in many pairs of days, there appears to be a substantial correlation between the TE values on the edges across days. This is particularly pronounced for cultures 1-3 and 1-1, though visual assessment of the trend is complicated by the many zero values (where TE is not significant), gaps in the distribution and outliers. As such, Figure 3a–d also display the Spearman rank-order correlation ($\rho$) for each early-late pair of days for each culture. This correlation is positive and statistically significant at the ${\displaystyle \mathrm{p}<0.01}$ level (after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons) between all the final pairs of recording days in the analysed cultures (including those in the additional cultures). Table 3 summarises the proportions of pairs of recordings (including the additional cultures) which had significant positive Spearman correlations between the TE values on the edges across days. Whether we focus on either the final pairs of recordings or also include pairs that occur after day 15 (by which time the information flow networks have emerged), either all or all but one of the pairs of recordings exhibit such correlations. Moreover, the probability of this number of correlations arising by chance is found to be very low. This represents a strong tendency for the relatively strong information flows between a given source and target on later days to be associated with the relatively strong information flow between the same source and target on an earlier day of development. Figure 3 displays these Spearman correlations between the early and late TE between source-target pairs visually. We notice a trend, whereby the correlation of the TE values seems to be higher between closer days (sample point being closer to the diagonal) and where those days are later in the development of the cultures (sample points being further to the right).

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

Table 3

	All cultures, final pair	All cultures, final pair or post day 15	Bursting, final pair	Bursting, final pair or post day 15
Edge	7/7**	8/9**	6/6**	7/8**
Out	5/7**	6/9**	5/6**	6/8**
In	3/7*	3/9*	3/6*	3/8*
Burst-local ratios	5/7**	6/9**	5/6**	6/8**

We also investigated the manner in which a node’s tendency to be an information source hub might be bound once information flows are established. Figure 4 shows scatter plots between the outgoing TE of each node (averaged across all targets) on different days of development along with the associated Spearman correlations (Appendix 3—figure 5 shows these plots for the additional cultures). By observing the scatter plots, it is easy to see that there is a strong positive relationship between the outgoing information flow from a given node on an earlier day of development and the outgoing flow from that same node on a later day (when we restrict ourselves to focusing on pairs occurring after a substantial number of statistically significant information flows have been established). This is not surprising, given the correlation we already established for TE on individual pairs, but does not automatically follow from that. As with the TE on the edges, Table 3 summarises the proportions of pairs of recordings (including the additional cultures) which had significant positive Spearman correlations between the outgoing TE from each node across days. We see that, whether we focus on just the last recordings of each culture or also include those after day 15, a substantial majority of pairs of recordings exhibit such correlations and that such a majority would be very unlikely to arise by chance. Some of these correlations are particularly strong, and indeed stronger than that observed on the TEs of individual node pairs. For instance, between days 16 and 24 of culture 1-3 we have that $\rho =0.62$ and between days 14 and 20 of culture 1-1 we have that $\rho =0.71$. Figure 4 visualises all Spearman correlations between the early and late total outgoing TE of a given node. As per the TEs for individual node pairs, the correlation is higher between closer days and where those days are later in the development of the cultures.

Figure 4

Download asset Open asset

Appendix 2—figure 1 shows similar plots to Figure 4, but for the average inward TE on each node (with Appendix 3—figure 6 showing plots for the additional cultures). We observe three cases of significant correlations in this value between early and late days, indicating a weaker yet still statistically significant (Table 3) propensity for the average inward TE to also lock-in.

Of course, some pairs involving earlier days of some cultures (such as day 10 of cultures 1-3 and 2-5) do not exhibit such lock-in tendencies. However, as displayed in Table 2, there are very few significant information flows at this early stage of development (44 and 185, respectively). This represents a point in development perhaps too early for any substantial information flow networks to have emerged.

In summary, the data suggests that, in these developing neural cell cultures, the structure of the information flows is to a large degree locked-in early in development, around the point at which the information dynamics emerge. There is a strong tendency for properties of these flows on later days to be correlated with those same properties on earlier days. Specifically, we have looked at the flows between source-target pairs, the average outgoing flow from a source, and the average incoming flow to a target. The values of these variables on later DIV were found, in the majority of cases, to be positively correlated with the same values on earlier DIV. Further, there were no cases where a statistically significant negative correlation was found.

Information flows quantify computational role of burst position

Developing cultures of dissociated neurons have a tendency to self-organise so as to produce population bursts or avalanches (Wagenaar et al., 2006b; Pasquale et al., 2008). Such spike avalanches are not only a feature of cell cultures, being a ubiquitous feature of in vivo neural recordings (Priesemann et al., 2014; Priesemann et al., 2013; Priesemann et al., 2009). There is a wide body of work discussing the potential computational importance of such periods of neuronal activity (Lisman, 1997; Krahe and Gabbiani, 2004; Shew et al., 2011; Kinouchi and Copelli, 2006; Haldeman and Beggs, 2005; Rubinov et al., 2011; Cramer et al., 2020). It has been observed that cultures often follow one or more ordered patterns of burst propagation (Maeda et al., 1995), with some nodes exhibiting a tendency to burst towards the beginning of these patterns and others towards their end (Schroeter et al., 2015). More recent work has proposed that the nodes which tend to burst at different points in these progressions play different computational roles (Schroeter et al., 2015). This work has placed special importance on those nodes which usually burst during the middle of the burst progression, conjecturing that they act as the ‘brokers of neuronal communication’.

The framework of information dynamics is uniquely poised to illuminate the computational dynamics during population bursting as well as the different roles that might be played by various nodes during these bursts. This is due to its ability to analyse information processing locally in time (Lizier, 2013; Lizier et al., 2008; Lizier, 2014; Wibral et al., 2014b), as well as directionally between information sources and targets via the asymmetry of TE. This allows us to isolate the information processing taking place during population bursting activity. We can then determine the information processing roles undertaken by the different nodes and examine how this relates to their average position in the burst propagation.

We analyse the information flowing between nodes during population bursts by estimating the burst-local TE between nodes in each recording (i.e. averaging the TE rates only during bursting periods, using probability distribution functions estimated over the whole recordings; see section ‘Estimation of burst-local TE’). We also measure the mean position of each node within bursts (with earlier bursting nodes having a lower numerical position; see section ‘Analysis of population bursts’). Note that, although there is variability of the burst position across bursts, certain nodes have much lower or higher mean burst positions, indicating a strong tendency to burst earlier or later within the propagation.

Figure 5a and b show plots of the mean burst position plotted against the total inward (Figure 5a) and outward (Figure 5b) burst-local TE of each node. Appendix 3—figure 7 shows these plots for the additional cultures. Plots are only shown for days where there were at least 10 statistically significant burst-local TE values. The Spearman correlation ($\rho$) between these variables is also displayed on the plots.

Figure 5

Download asset Open asset

We see from Figure 5 that, particularly for the final recording days, in most cases there is a positive correlation between the mean burst position of the node and the total inward burst-local TE. In some cases, this correlation is particularly strong. For instance, on the 24th DIV of culture 1-3, we observe a Spearman correlation of $\rho =0.84$. In other words, we observe that nodes which tend to burst later have higher incoming information flows. Table 4 summarises the proportions of recordings (including the additional cultures) which had significant positive Spearman correlations between the mean burst position of the node and the total inward burst-local TE. By focussing on recordings that have reached a state of established information dynamics, by either selecting all final recordings or all that were performed post day 15, we see that in all cases a clear majority of cases had a statistically significant positive Spearman correlation. Moreover, the probability of this number of correlations arising by chance is found to be very low. These relationships suggest that there is a tendency for the late bursters to occupy the specialised computational role of information receivers.

Table 4

	All cultures, final day	All cultures post day 15	Bursting, final day	Bursting, post day 15
In	7/11**	10/15**	7/10**	10/14**
Out	7/11**	11/15**	7/10**	11/14**

Conversely, as shown in Figure 5, there is a tendency for the mean burst position of the nodes to be negatively correlated with the outward burst-local TE. Again, this correlation is particularly strong in many cases. For example, on the 24th DIV of culture 1-3, we observe a Spearman correlation of $\rho =-0.80$. In other words, we observe that nodes which tend to burst earlier have higher outward information flows. Table 4 summarises the proportions of recordings (including the additional cultures) which had significant negative Spearman correlations between the mean burst position of the node and the total outward burst-local TE. We see that a clear majority of either all final recording days or all recordings performed post day 15 had a statistically significant negative Spearman correlation. Moreover, the probability of this number of correlations arising by chance is found to be very low. These relationships suggest that there is a tendency for the early bursters to occupy the specialised computational role of information receivers.

Figure 5 plots the total incoming burst-local TE on each node against the total outgoing burst-local TE, with points coloured according to the node’s mean burst position (Appendix 3—figure 8 shows these plots for the additional cultures). We see a very clear pattern in these plots, which is remarkably clear on some later recording days: nodes which often fire at the beginning of the burst progression have high outgoing information flows with lower incoming flows, whereas those which tend to sit at the end of the progression have high incoming flows with lower outgoing flows. By contrast, those nodes which, on average, occupy the middle of the burst progression have a balance between outgoing and incoming information transfer. These nodes within the middle of the burst propagation are, therefore, occupying the suggested role of mediators of information flow.

Early lock-in of specialised computational roles

Given that we have seen in section ‘Information flows quantify computational role of burst position’ that nodes tend to occupy specialised computational roles based on their average position in the burst propagation and that we have seen in section ‘Early lock-in of information flows’ that information processing properties can lock-in early in development, it is worth asking whether the specialised computational roles that nodes occupy during population bursts lock-in during the earlier stages of neuronal development.

In order to investigate this question, we quantified the computational role occupied by a node by measuring the proportion of its total incoming and outgoing burst-local TE that was made up by its outgoing burst-local TE. Scatters of these proportions between earlier and later DIV are plotted in Figure 6 for the main cultures (the additional cultures are shown in Appendix 3—figure 9). They also display the Spearman rank-order correlations ($\rho$) between the ratios on different days. We see that, in many cases, there are strong, significant, correlations in this ratio between earlier and later DIV. Table 3 summarises the proportions of pairs of recordings (including the additional cultures) which had significant positive Spearman correlations between this ratio on each node across days. We see that, whether we focus on just the last recordings of each culture or also include those after day 15, a clear majority of pairs of recordings exhibit such correlations and that such a majority would be very unlikely to arise by chance. Figure 6 visualises all these Spearman correlations between the early and late day pairs.

Figure 6

Download asset Open asset

These results suggest that, if a node is an information transmitter during population bursts at the point at which the information flows are established, it has a tendency to maintain this specialised role later in development. Similarly, being an information receiver earlier in development increases the probability that the node will occupy this same role later.

Information flows in an STDP model of development

In order to investigate the generality of the phenomena revealed in this article, we reimplemented a model network (Khoshkhou and Montakhab, 2019) of Izhikevich neurons (Izhikevich, 2003) developing according to an STDP (Caporale and Dan, 2008) update rule as described in section ‘Network of Izhikevich neurons’. For the low value of the synaptic time constant which we used (see section ‘Network of Izhikevich neurons’), these networks developed from a state where each neuron underwent independent tonic spiking at a regular firing rate to one in which the dynamics were dominated by periodic population bursts (Zeraati et al., 2021; Khoshkhou and Montakhab, 2019). It is worth noting that these population bursts are significantly more regular than those in the biological data used in this article. Small modifications were made to the original model in order that the development occurred over a greater length of time. The greater length of development allowed us to extract time windows which were short relative to the timescale of development (resulting in the dynamics being approximately stationary in these windows) yet still long enough to sample enough spikes for reliable TE rate estimation. The windows which we used resulted in a median of 5170 spikes per neuron per window compared with a median of 17,399 spikes per electrode in the biological data. See section ‘Network of Izhikevich neurons’ for more details on the modifications made. A single simulation was run. The dynamics of the model are very consistent across independent runs. Three windows were extracted, extending between the simulation timepoints of 200 and 250 seconds, 400 and 450 seconds, and 500 and 550 seconds. These time windows were labelled ‘early’, ‘mid’, and ‘late’, respectively. The early window was chosen such that it had a nonzero number of significant TE values, but such that this number was of the same (order of magnitude in) proportion as observed in the first recording days of the cell cultures (refer to Table 2). The mid period was set at the point where population bursting begun to emerge, and the late period was set at the point where all neurons were bursting approximately synchronously in a pronounced manner.

TE values between all pairs of model neurons were estimated, as described in section ‘Transfer entropy estimation’. These estimates were then subjected to the same statistical analysis as the cell culture data, the results of which are presented in the preceding subsections of this section. The plots of this analysis are displayed in Figures 7 and 8.

Figure 7

Download asset Open asset

Figure 8

Download asset Open asset

Scatters and box plots of the TE values estimated in each developmental window are shown in Figure 7. We observe a large, monotonic, increase in these values over development. This mirrors the finding in cell cultures, as described in section ‘The dramatic increase in the flow of information during development’.

We also observe a similar lock-in phenomenon of information processing as was found in the cell cultures (described in section ‘Early lock-in of information flows’). Figure 7a–d show the correlation in information flow between different stages of development. Specifically, Figure 7a plots the correlation in TE values between each ordered pair of neurons between early and later windows. Figure 7d plots this same correlation, but for the total incoming TE on each neuron, and Figure 7c does this for the total outgoing TE. In all six of the plots for the relationships between the TE on each edge and for the total outgoing TE, we observe a substantial statistically significant positive correlation between values on earlier and later days (significant at the ${\displaystyle \mathrm{p}<0.01}$ level, with Bonferroni correction). We observe smaller positive correlations in these values for the total incoming TE on each node, although these correlations are not significant, which aligns somewhat with the weaker effect observed for incoming TE in the cultures. As with the cell cultures, some of the observed correlations are particularly strong, such as the Spearman correlation of $\rho =0.62$ between the total outgoing TE on each node in the mid window and this same value in the late window. This implies that the spatial structure of the information flow has a tendency to be determined in the earlier stages of development, after which they are locked-in – in a similar fashion to what was observed in the biological experiments in earlier sections.

We also performed the same analysis on computational roles as presented in section ‘Information flows quantify computational role of burst position’. This analysis, the results of which are presented in Figure 8, only looked at the mid and late windows. The early window was ignored due to its lack of bursting activity. In the mid recording window, we observe a strong relationship between the mean burst position of the neuron and its computational role. Figure 8 shows that there is a significant (at the ${\displaystyle \mathrm{p}<0.01}$ level) positive correlation between the mean burst position of a neuron and its total incoming burst-local TE (see section ‘Estimation of burst-local TE’ for more details on the burst-local TE). There is also a negative correlation between the mean burst position and the total outgoing burst-local TE, as shown in Figure 8. However, this relationship is not significant after Bonferroni correction. These same figures also display these relationships for the late window. Here, we observe the same directions of relationships. This relationship is incredibly strong between incoming TE and burst position ($\rho =0.81$). The relationship between the outgoing TE and burst position is still negative, although it is not as strong as in the mid window and is no longer significant. Inspection of Figure 8 reveals that there is still a very clear negative relationship between burst position and outgoing TE after a burst position of about 20. Indeed, if we condition on the burst position being greater than 20, then we find a Spearman correlation of $\rho =0.80$, which is significant at the ${\displaystyle \mathrm{p}<0.01}$ with Bonferroni correction. Inspection of the spike rasters of these simulations suggests that the anomalous results for the earliest bursters may be due to their spiking a very substantial distance ahead of the rest of the population in these simulations. These differing burst dynamics mean that the earliest bursters are then less able to reduce the uncertainty in the spike times of the majority of the neurons which begin spiking significantly later.

This implies that, midway through development, we are observing the same specialisation into computational roles based on burst position as was observed in the cell cultures: early bursters display a tendency to be information transmitters, late bursters operate as receivers, and middle bursters exhibit a balance of the two. Later on in development, we do, however, observe a slight departure from the roles we observed in the cell cultures. The computational roles are shifted further down the burst propagation and the earliest bursters here are less strongly driving the rest of the population.

It is worth noting that the estimated TE values in the model are substantially higher than in the biological dataset. The median estimated TE in the late window of the model was around $40\mathrm{nats}\text{.}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ (Figure 7). Conversely, it was less than $0.2\mathrm{nats}\text{.}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ for every last recording day of the cell cultures (Figure 1). This is due to the much higher spike rate of the model implying that the dynamics are operating on different timescales. Indeed, if we compare the magnitude of the burst-local TE – which is measured in nats per spike (see section ‘Estimation of burst-local TE’) – between the model and the biological data (Figures 8 and 5, respectively), we find values of similar magnitude.

In summary, in a network model of Izhikevich neurons developing according to STDP towards a state of population bursts, we observe a similar developmental information processing phenomena as in the cell cultures. Namely, the amount of information flowing across the network increases dramatically, the spatial structure of this flow locks in early, and the neurons take on specialised computational roles based on their burst position.

Biological neural networks are imbued with an incredible capacity for computation, which is deployed in a flexible manner in order to achieve required tasks. Despite the importance of this capacity to the function of organisms, how it emerges during development has remained largely a mystery. Information dynamics (Lizier, 2013; Lizier et al., 2014; Lizier et al., 2008; Lizier et al., 2010; Lizier et al., 2012) provides a framework for studying such computational capacity by measuring the degree to which the fundamental information processing operations of information storage, transfer, and modification occur within an observed system.

Previous work on the information flow component of computational capacity in neural cell cultures (Nigam et al., 2016; Shimono and Beggs, 2015; Matsuda et al., 2013; Timme et al., 2014; Kajiwara et al., 2021; Timme et al., 2016; Wibral et al., 2017) has focussed on the static structure of information flow networks at single points in time. This has mostly taken the form of elucidating properties of the functional networks implied by the information flows. However, such work leaves open questions concerning how these structures are formed. We address this gap here.

An initial goal in addressing how computational capacity emerges was to determine when the information flow component arrived. It is plausible that this capacity could have been present shortly after plating or that it could have arrived suddenly at a later point in maturation. What we see, however, is that the capacity for information transmission is either not present or only minimally present in the early DIV. This can be seen by looking at the very low mean TE values in the first column of Table 1. However, over the course of development we see that the TE values increase progressively, reaching values orders of magnitude larger. This implies that information transmission is a capacity which is developed enormously during neuronal development and that its gain is spread consistently throughout the observed period.

The information processing operations of a system tend to be distributed over it in a heterogeneous fashion. For example, it has been found in models of whole-brain networks (Li et al., 2019; Marinazzo et al., 2012; Marinazzo et al., 2014b), abstract network models (Ceguerra et al., 2011; Novelli et al., 2020; Goodman and Porfiri, 2020), and even energy networks (Lizier et al., 2009) that nodes with high indegrees tend to also have high outgoing information flows. Section ‘The emergence of functional information flow networks’ examined the emergent information flow networks, formed by connecting nodes with a statistically significant TE value between them. In accordance with this previous work – and indeed the large variation in shared, unique and synergistic information flow components observed on the same dataset (albeit with the discrete-time estimator) (Wibral et al., 2017) – these networks exhibited a high degree of heterogeneity. Notably, as shown in Figure 2a, they have prominent hubs of inward flow (sinks) along with less pronounced hubs of outgoing flow (sources). Moreover, along with heterogeneity within individual networks, large structural differences are easily observed between the different networks shown in Figure 2a.

Keeping with our goal of uncovering how features of mature information flow networks self-organise, we examined how this heterogeneity at both the intra-network and inter-network levels emerged. It was found in section ‘Early lock-in of information flows’ that the key features of the information flow structure are locked-in early in development, around the point at which the information flows emerge. This effect was identified for the outgoing TE from each node, for example, where we found strong correlations over the different days of development. It is worth further noting that this lock-in phenomenon occurs remarkably early in development. Specifically, in very many cases, we observe strong correlations between quantities estimated on the first recording days with nonzero TE and the same quantities estimated on later days. This early lock-in provides us with a mechanism for how the high heterogeneity exhibited in the inflow and outflow hubs emerges. Small differences between networks on early DIV will be magnified on subsequent days. This leads to the high levels of inter-network heterogeneity that we observe. A similar phenomenon has been observed with STDP, which can lead to symmetry breaking in network structure (Gilson et al., 2009; Kunkel et al., 2011), whereby small fluctuations in early development can set the trajectory of the synaptic weights on a specific path with a strong history dependence. In order to confirm a hypothesis that this observed lock-in of information flows could be induced by STDP, in section ‘Information flows in an STDP model of development’ we studied the information dynamics of a model network of Izhikevich neurons developing according to an STDP (Caporale and Dan, 2008) update rule from a state of independent tonic firing to population bursting. The lock-in of key features of the information flow structure was evident over the period where the network developed from independent firing to approximately synchronous bursting (i.e., bursts occurring at approximately the same point in time). This indicates a plausible mechanism for our observations and suggests a broader generality of these phenomena.

An interesting difference between the results for the model and the biological data is that the lock-in effect was stronger for outward TE as well as the TE on the edges than in the biological data. The reasons for this difference require further investigation; however, it might be due to the multi-unit nature of the biological data. A possible direction of future work is to modify the model such that the activity on neurons is sub-sampled and aggregated in order to model the effect of placing electrodes in a culture. However, this will detract from the simplicity of the model in its current form.

It has been hypothesised that different neural units take on specialised computational roles (Schroeter et al., 2015; Frost and Goebel, 2012; Cohen and D’Esposito, 2016). In section ‘Information flows quantify computational role of burst position’, we investigated the information flows occurring during the critical bursting periods of the cultures’ dynamics. Specifically, we studied the burst-local TE in order to measure the information being transferred between nodes during these periods. The plots shown in Figure 5 show a clear tendency for the nodes to take on specialised computational roles as development progresses. Moreover, these computational roles were tightly coupled to the position the node tended to burst within in the burst propagation. Nodes that tended to initiate the bursts had a tendency to have high outgoing information transfer combined with low incoming information flow, implying their role as information transmitters. The opposite relationship is observed for typically late bursters, indicating their role as information receivers. By contrast, nodes that usually burst during the middle of the progression have a balance between outward and inward flows. This indicates that they are the crucial links between the transmitters and receivers of information. Neurons bursting in the middle of the burst progression of dissociated cell cultures have received special attention in past work using undirected measures, where it was conjectured that they act as the ‘brokers of neuronal communication’ (Schroeter et al., 2015). In this work, we have provided novel supporting evidence for this conjecture by specifically identifying the directed information flows into and out of these nodes. Moreover, in section ‘Information flows in an STDP model of development’, we observed that this same specialisation of neurons into computational roles based on average burst position occurred in a model network of Izhikevich neurons which had developed via an STDP learning rule to a state of population bursting. This suggests that this phenomenon might exist more generally than the specific cell cultures studied. It is also worth noting that some of these relationships, notably those shown in Figure 7b and d, are much stronger than what was observed in the cell culture. It is likely that this is due to the fact that in the model we estimated TE between individual model neurons, whereas in the cultures we estimated TE between the MUA on each electrode. A possible direction for future work will be to study how the estimated information flow changes when we aggregate the spikes from multiple model neurons into simulated MUA.

It is worth reflecting on the fact that the observed correlations between burst-local information transfer and average burst position will not occur in all neuronal populations. For instance, in populations with strictly periodic bursts, each node’s behaviour will be well explained by its own history, resulting in very low burst-local TE’s, regardless of burst position. Furthermore, neuronal populations develop bursty dynamics to different extents and such quantities (let alone their correlation) are simply less meaningful in the absence of burstiness (e.g. for the final day of culture 1-5 as stated in Figure 3A of Wagenaar et al., 2006b).

Returning once more to our focus on investigating the emergence of information flows, we have demonstrated, in section ‘Early lock-in of specialised computational roles’, that these specialist computational roles have a tendency to lock-in early. There we looked at the ratio of outgoing burst-local TE to the total burst-local TE on each node. It was found that there is a strong tendency for this ratio to be correlated between early and late days of development. This suggests that the computational role that a node performs during population bursts is determined to a large degree early in development.

Insights into development aside, a fundamental technical difference between the work presented here and previous studies of TE in neural cultures is that here we use a recently developed continuous-time estimator of TE (Shorten et al., 2021). This estimator was demonstrated to have far higher accuracy in estimating information flows than the traditional discrete-time estimator. The principal challenge which is faced when using the discrete-time estimator is that the curse of dimensionality limits the number of previous time bins that can be used to estimate the history-dependent spike rates. All applications of this estimator to spiking data from cell cultures of which the authors are aware (Nigam et al., 2016; Shimono and Beggs, 2015; Matsuda et al., 2013; Timme et al., 2014; Kajiwara et al., 2021; Timme et al., 2016) made use of only a single previous bin in the estimation of these rates. This makes it impossible to simultaneously achieve high time precision and capture the dependence of the spike rate on spikes occurring further back in time. Conversely, by operating on the interspike intervals, the continuous-time estimator can capture the dependence of the spike rate on events occurring relatively far back in time, while maintaining the time precision of the raw data. Looking at a specific representative example, our target history embeddings made use of the previous four interspike intervals (section ‘Selection of embedding lengths’). For the recording on day 24 of culture 1-3, the mean interspike interval was 0.71 s. This implies that the target history embeddings on average extended over a period of 2.84 s. The raw data was collected with a sampling rate of $25\mathrm{kHz}$ (Wagenaar et al., 2006b). In order to lose no time precision, the discrete-time estimator would thus have to use bins of 40 s, and then in order to extend over 2.84 s, the target history embeddings would therefore need to consist of around 70,000 bins which is empirically not possible to sample well.

It is worth noting that, as we were performing a longitudinal analysis where each studied recording was separated by days or weeks, we did not perform spike sorting as we would have been unable to match the different units on an electrode across different recordings. We would then not have been able to compare the TE values on a given unit over the course of development. Instead, we analysed the spikes on each electrode without sorting. As such, this work studies MUA (Schroeter et al., 2015). Spike sorting applied to data collected from a near-identical recording setup found an average of four neurons per electrode (Wagenaar et al., 2006a). This situates this work at a spatial scale slightly larger than spike-sorted neural data, but still orders of magnitude finer than fMRI, EEG, or MEG (Bassett and Sporns, 2017).

Functional and effective networks arising from the publicly available dataset used in this article (Wagenaar et al., 2006b) have been studied by other authors. For instance, it was shown that the functional networks were small world (Downes et al., 2012) and that more connected nodes exhibited stronger signatures of nonlinearity (Minati et al., 2019). Work has also been conducted analysing the burst propagation of these cultures, finding that there are ‘leader’ nodes which consistently burst before the rest of the population (Eckmann et al., 2008). These are the information transmitters that we have observed in this work here.

An exciting direction for future work will be to move beyond directed functional networks to examine the information flow provided by higher-order multivariate TEs in an effective network structure (Novelli and Lizier, 2021; Novelli et al., 2019). The networks inferred by such higher-order TEs are able to better reflect the networks’ underlying structural features (Novelli and Lizier, 2021). As was the case with bivariate TEs prior to this work, there is an absence of work investigating how the networks of multivariate information flow emerge during neural development. Moreover, moving to higher-order measures will allow us to more fully characterise the multifaceted specialised computational roles undertaken by neurons.

Appendix 1—figure 1

Download asset Open asset

Previous studies have placed an emphasis on the observation of log-normal distributions of TE values in in vitro cultures of neurons (Shimono and Beggs, 2015; Nigam et al., 2016). As such, we analysed the distribution of the nonzero (statistically significant) estimated TE values in each individual recording.

Figure 1 shows histograms as well as probability density functions estimated by a kernel density estimator (KDE) of the nonzero TE values for each recording. From these plots, we can see that the distributions of TE values exhibit a clear right (positive) skew. In order to ascertain how well the estimated TE values were described by a log-normal distribution, we constructed quantile-quantile (QQ) plots (Gibbons and Chakraborti, 2020) for the TE values against the log-normal distribution in Appendix 1—figure 1. In all recordings, the plotted points deviate from the line $y=x$, indicating that the data is not well described by a log-normal distribution. However, this deviation appears only slight for some recordings, most notably days 22 and 28 of culture 2-5. We also perform Shapiro–Wilk tests (Shapiro and Wilk, 1965) for log-normality, the resulting p-values are displayed in Appendix 1—table 3. The p-values for every recording are incredibly low, meaning that we reject the null hypothesis of a log-normal distribution in every case.

Given that the distributions of the TE values were not well described by a log-normal distribution, we investigated the alternative that they could be described by a normal distribution. Appendix 1—figure 1 displays QQ plots (Gibbons and Chakraborti, 2020) for the TE values against the normal distribution. In all recordings, the plotted points deviate substantially from the line $y=x$, indicating that the data is poorly described by a normal distribution. We also perform Shapiro–Wilk tests (Shapiro and Wilk, 1965) for normality, the resulting p-values are displayed in Appendix 1—table 1. The p-values for every recording are incredibly low, meaning that we reject the null hypothesis of a normal distribution in every case.

These results contrast with observation of log-normal distributions of TE values in in vitro cultures of neurons (Shimono and Beggs, 2015; Nigam et al., 2016). The difference may be due to the use of continuous-time estimator here in contrast to the discrete-time estimator used in previous studies. This estimator is more faithful to capturing the true underlying TE for spike trains (as per Shorten et al., 2021); however, it may be that the combination of the discrete-time estimator and use of only a single previous time-bin – in specifically not representing history dependence well – align more strongly with the component of the statistical relationship that follows a log-normal distribution. It is also possible that log-normal distributions of TE emerge later in development and are simply not yet present in the early developmental stages observed here (noting that the fit to a log-normal distribution seems to improve for later DIV in Appendix 1—figure 1).

This work made use of a publicly available dataset which can be found at: http://neurodatasharing.bme.gatech.edu/development-data/html/index.html. Analysis scripts are available at: https://bitbucket.org/dpshorten/cell_cultures (copy archived at swh:1:rev:8ee5e519da5cb90590865e9a692b96ad7e68a69e).

1. 1. Pine J
   2. Potter S

   (2006) neurodatasharing

   ID development-data. Network activity of developing cortical cultures in vitro.

   http://neurodatasharing.bme.gatech.edu/development-data/html/index.html

1. 1. Aldridge JW
   2. Gilman S

   (1991) The temporal structure of spike trains in the primate basal ganglia: afferent regulation of bursting demonstrated with precentral cerebral cortical ablation

   Brain Research 543:123–138.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(91)91055-6

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Bakkum DJ
   2. Radivojevic M
   3. Frey U
   4. Franke F
   5. Hierlemann A
   6. Takahashi H

   (2013) Parameters for burst detection

   Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 7:193.

   https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2013.00193

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Bassett DS
   2. Sporns O

   (2017) Network neuroscience

   Nature Neuroscience 20:353–364.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4502

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. Book

   1. Bossomaier T
   2. Barnett L
   3. Harré M
   4. Lizier JT

   (2016) An Introduction to Transfer Entropy

   Cham: Springer International Publishing.

   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43222-9

   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Caporale N
   2. Dan Y

   (2008) Spike timing–dependent plasticity: a hebbian learning rule, Annu

   Annual Review of Neuroscience 31:25–46.

   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125639

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. Conference

   1. Ceguerra RV
   2. Lizier JT
   3. Zomaya AY

   (2011) Information storage and transfer in the synchronization process in locally-connected networks

   2011 IEEE Symposium On Artificial Life - Part Of 17273 - 2011 Ssci.

   https://doi.org/10.1109/ALIFE.2011.5954653

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Cohen JR
   2. D’Esposito M

   (2016) The segregation and integration of distinct brain networks and their relationship to cognition

   The Journal of Neuroscience 36:12083–12094.

   https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2965-15.2016

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Cramer B
   2. Stöckel D
   3. Kreft M
   4. Wibral M
   5. Schemmel J
   6. Meier K
   7. Priesemann V

   (2020) Control of criticality and computation in spiking neuromorphic networks with plasticity

   Nature Communications 11:2853.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16548-3

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Downes JH
   2. Hammond MW
   3. Xydas D
   4. Spencer MC
   5. Becerra VM
   6. Warwick K
   7. Whalley BJ
   8. Nasuto SJ

   (2012) Emergence of a small-world functional network in cultured neurons

   PLOS Computational Biology 8:e1002522.

   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002522

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Eckmann JP
    2. Jacobi S
    3. Marom S
    4. Moses E
    5. Zbinden C

    (2008) Leader neurons in population bursts of 2D living neural networks

    New Journal of Physics 10:015011.

    https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/10/1/015011

    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Erten EY
    2. Lizier JT
    3. Piraveenan M
    4. Prokopenko M

    (2017) Criticality and information dynamics in epidemiological models

    Entropy 19:194.

    https://doi.org/10.3390/e19050194

    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Frost MA
    2. Goebel R

    (2012) Measuring structural–functional correspondence: spatial variability of specialised brain regions after macro-anatomical alignment

    NeuroImage 59:1369–1381.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.035

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Garcia-Lazaro JA
    2. Belliveau LAC
    3. Lesica NA

    (2013) Independent population coding of speech with sub-millisecond precision

    The Journal of Neuroscience 33:19362–19372.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3711-13.2013

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Garland J
    2. James RG
    3. Bradley E

    (2016) Leveraging information storage to select forecast-optimal parameters for delay-coordinate reconstructions

    Physical Review. E 93:022221.

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.93.022221

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Garofalo M
    2. Nieus T
    3. Massobrio P
    4. Martinoia S

    (2009) Evaluation of the performance of information theory-based methods and cross-correlation to estimate the functional connectivity in cortical networks

    PLOS ONE 4:e6482.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006482

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. Book

    1. Gibbons JD
    2. Chakraborti S

    (2020) Nonparametric Statistical Inference (6th edition)

    Boca Raton: CRC press.

    https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315110479

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Gilson M
    2. Burkitt AN
    3. Grayden DB
    4. Thomas DA
    5. van Hemmen JL

    (2009) Emergence of network structure due to spike-timing-dependent plasticity in recurrent neuronal networks

    Biological Cybernetics 101:427–444.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-009-0346-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Goodman R
    2. Porfiri M

    (2020) Topological features determining the error in the inference of networks using transfer entropy

    Mathematics in Engineering 2:34–54.

    https://doi.org/10.3934/mine.2020003

    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Haldeman C
    2. Beggs JM

    (2005) Critical branching captures activity in living neural networks and maximizes the number of metastable states

    Physical Review Letters 94:058101.

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.058101

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Hansen MJ
    2. Burns AL
    3. Monk CT
    4. Schutz C
    5. Lizier JT
    6. Ramnarine I
    7. Ward AJW
    8. Krause J

    (2021) The effect of predation risk on group behaviour and information flow during repeated collective decisions

    Animal Behaviour 173:215–239.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.01.005

    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Huang CS
    2. Pal NR
    3. Chuang CH
    4. Lin CT

    (2015) Identifying changes in eeg information transfer during drowsy driving by transfer entropy

    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9:570.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00570

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Izhikevich EM

    (2003) Simple model of spiking neurons

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 14:1569–1572.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2003.820440

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. Preprint

    1. Kajiwara M
    2. Nomura R
    3. Goetze F
    4. Akutsu T
    5. Shimono M

    (2020) Inhibitory Neurons Are a Central Controlling Regulator in the Effective Cortical Microconnectome

    bioRxiv.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.18.954016

    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Kajiwara M
    2. Nomura R
    3. Goetze F
    4. Kawabata M
    5. Isomura Y
    6. Akutsu T
    7. Shimono M

    (2021) Inhibitory neurons exhibit high controlling ability in the cortical microconnectome

    PLOS Computational Biology 17:e1008846.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008846

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Kaneoke Y
    2. Vitek JL

    (1996) Burst and oscillation as disparate neuronal properties

    Journal of Neuroscience Methods 68:211–223.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0270(96)00081-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Kayser C
    2. Logothetis NK
    3. Panzeri S

    (2010) Millisecond encoding precision of auditory cortex neurons

    PNAS 107:16976–16981.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012656107

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Khoshkhou M
    2. Montakhab A

    (2019) Spike-timing-dependent plasticity with axonal delay tunes networks of izhikevich neurons to the edge of synchronization transition with scale-free avalanches

    Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 13:73.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00073

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Kinouchi O
    2. Copelli M

    (2006) Optimal dynamical range of excitable networks at criticality

    Nature Physics 2:348–351.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys289

    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Kozachenko L
    2. Leonenko NN

    (1987)

    Sample estimate of the entropy of a random vector

    Problemy Peredachi Informatsii 23:9–16.

    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Krahe R
    2. Gabbiani F

    (2004) Burst firing in sensory systems

    Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 5:13–23.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1296

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Kraskov A
    2. Stögbauer H
    3. Grassberger P

    (2004) Estimating mutual information

    Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 69:066138.

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066138

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Kunkel S
    2. Diesmann M
    3. Morrison A

    (2011) Limits to the development of feed-forward structures in large recurrent neuronal networks

    Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 4:160.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2010.00160

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Li M
    2. Han Y
    3. Aburn MJ
    4. Breakspear M
    5. Poldrack RA
    6. Shine JM
    7. Lizier JT

    (2019) Transitions in information processing dynamics at the whole-brain network level are driven by alterations in neural gain

    PLOS Computational Biology 15:e1006957.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006957

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Lisman JE

    (1997) Bursts as a unit of neural information: making unreliable synapses reliable

    Trends in Neurosciences 20:38–43.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(96)10070-9

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Lizier JT
    2. Prokopenko M
    3. Zomaya AY

    (2008) Local information transfer as a spatiotemporal filter for complex systems

    Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 77:026110.

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.77.026110

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. Conference

    1. Lizier JT
    2. Prokopenko M
    3. Cornforth DJ

    (2009)

    The information dynamics of cascading failures in energy networks

    Proceedings of the European Conference on Complex Systems (ECCS.

    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Lizier JT
    2. Prokopenko M
    3. Zomaya AY

    (2010) Information modification and particle collisions in distributed computation

    Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.) 20:037109.

    https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3486801

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Lizier JT
    2. Heinzle J
    3. Horstmann A
    4. Haynes JD
    5. Prokopenko M

    (2011) Multivariate information-theoretic measures reveal directed information structure and task relevant changes in fmri connectivity

    Journal of Computational Neuroscience 30:85–107.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-010-0271-2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Lizier JT
    2. Prokopenko M
    3. Zomaya AY

    (2012) Local measures of information storage in complex distributed computation

    Information Sciences 208:39–54.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.04.016

    • Google Scholar
40. Book

    1. Lizier JT

    (2013) The Local Information Dynamics of Distributed Computation in Complex Systems

    Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32952-4

    • Google Scholar
41. Book

    1. Lizier JT

    (2014) Measuring the dynamics of information processing on a local scale in time and space

    In: Wibral M, Vicente R, Lizier JT, editors. Directed Information Measures in Neuroscience. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 161–193.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54474-3_7

    • Google Scholar
42. Book

    1. Lizier JT
    2. Prokopenko M
    3. Zomaya AY

    (2014) A framework for the local information dynamics of distributed computation in complex systems

    In: Prokopenko M, editors. Guided Self-Organization: Inception. Springer. pp. 115–158.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53734-9_5

    • Google Scholar
43. Book

    1. MacKay DJ
    2. Kay DJM

    (2003)

    Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms

    Cambridge university press.

    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Maeda E
    2. Robinson HP
    3. Kawana A

    (1995) The mechanisms of generation and propagation of synchronized bursting in developing networks of cortical neurons

    The Journal of Neuroscience 15:6834–6845.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-10-06834.1995

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Mäki-Marttunen V
    2. Diez I
    3. Cortes JM
    4. Chialvo DR
    5. Villarreal M

    (2013) Disruption of transfer entropy and inter-hemispheric brain functional connectivity in patients with disorder of consciousness

    Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 7:24.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00024

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Marinazzo D
    2. Wu G
    3. Pellicoro M
    4. Angelini L
    5. Stramaglia S

    (2012) Information flow in networks and the law of diminishing marginal returns: evidence from modeling and human electroencephalographic recordings

    PLOS ONE 7:e45026.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045026

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Marinazzo D
    2. Gosseries O
    3. Boly M
    4. Ledoux D
    5. Rosanova M
    6. Massimini M
    7. Noirhomme Q
    8. Laureys S

    (2014a) Directed information transfer in scalp electroencephalographic recordings: insights on disorders of consciousness

    Clinical EEG and Neuroscience 45:33–39.

    https://doi.org/10.1177/1550059413510703

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Marinazzo D
    2. Pellicoro M
    3. Wu G
    4. Angelini L
    5. Cortés JM
    6. Stramaglia S

    (2014b) Information transfer and criticality in the ising model on the human connectome

    PLOS ONE 9:e93616.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093616

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. Conference

    1. Matsuda E
    2. Mita T
    3. Hubert J
    4. Oka M
    5. Bakkum D
    6. Frey U
    7. Takahashi H
    8. Ikegami T
    9. University of Tokyo

    (2013) Multiple time scales observed in spontaneously evolved neurons on high-density cmos electrode array

    European Conference on Artificial Life 2013. pp. 1075–1082.

    https://doi.org/10.7551/978-0-262-31709-2-ch161

    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Mijatovic G
    2. Antonacci Y
    3. Loncar-Turukalo T
    4. Minati L
    5. Faes L

    (2021) An information-theoretic framework to measure the dynamic interaction between neural spike trains

    IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering 68:3471–3481.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2021.3073833

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. Book

    1. Miller RG

    (2012)

    Simultaneous Statistical Inference

    Springer Science & Business Media.

    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Minati L
    2. Ito H
    3. Perinelli A
    4. Ricci L
    5. Faes L
    6. Yoshimura N
    7. Koike Y
    8. Frasca M

    (2019) Connectivity influences on nonlinear dynamics in weakly-synchronized networks: Insights from rössler systems, electronic chaotic oscillators, model and biological neurons

    IEEE Access 7:174793–174821.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2957014

    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Nemenman I
    2. Lewen GD
    3. Bialek W
    4. de Ruyter van Steveninck RR

    (2008) Neural coding of natural stimuli: information at sub-millisecond resolution

    PLOS Computational Biology 4:e1000025.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000025

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. Website

    1. Network

    (2021) Network activity of developing cortical cultures in vitro

    Accessed January 3, 2021.

    http://neurodatasharing.bme.gatech.edu/development-data/html/index.html
55. 1. Nigam S
    2. Shimono M
    3. Ito S
    4. Yeh F-C
    5. Timme N
    6. Myroshnychenko M
    7. Lapish CC
    8. Tosi Z
    9. Hottowy P
    10. Smith WC
    11. Masmanidis SC
    12. Litke AM
    13. Sporns O
    14. Beggs JM

    (2016) Rich-club organization in effective connectivity among cortical neurons

    The Journal of Neuroscience 36:670–684.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2177-15.2016

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Novelli L
    2. Wollstadt P
    3. Mediano P
    4. Wibral M
    5. Lizier JT

    (2019) Large-scale directed network inference with multivariate transfer entropy and hierarchical statistical testing

    Network Neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) 3:827–847.

    https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00092

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Novelli L
    2. Atay FM
    3. Jost J
    4. Lizier JT

    (2020) Deriving pairwise transfer entropy from network structure and motifs

    Proceedings. Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences 476:20190779.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2019.0779

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Novelli L
    2. Lizier JT

    (2021) Inferring network properties from time series using transfer entropy and mutual information: Validation of multivariate versus bivariate approaches

    Network Neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) 5:373–404.

    https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00178

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Orlandi JG
    2. Stetter O
    3. Soriano J
    4. Geisel T
    5. Battaglia D

    (2014) Transfer entropy reconstruction and labeling of neuronal connections from simulated calcium imaging

    PLOS ONE 9:e98842.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098842

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Pasquale V
    2. Massobrio P
    3. Bologna LL
    4. Chiappalone M
    5. Martinoia S

    (2008) Self-organization and neuronal avalanches in networks of dissociated cortical neurons

    Neuroscience 153:1354–1369.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.03.050

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Priesemann V
    2. Munk MHJ
    3. Wibral M

    (2009) Subsampling effects in neuronal avalanche distributions recorded in vivo

    BMC Neuroscience 10:40.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-40

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Priesemann V
    2. Valderrama M
    3. Wibral M
    4. Le Van Quyen M

    (2013) Neuronal avalanches differ from wakefulness to deep sleep–evidence from intracranial depth recordings in humans

    PLOS Computational Biology 9:e1002985.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002985

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Priesemann V
    2. Wibral M
    3. Valderrama M
    4. Pröpper R
    5. Le Van Quyen M
    6. Geisel T
    7. Triesch J
    8. Nikolić D
    9. Munk MHJ

    (2014) Spike avalanches in vivo suggest a driven, slightly subcritical brain state

    Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 8:108.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00108

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Rubinov M
    2. Sporns O
    3. Thivierge JP
    4. Breakspear M

    (2011) Neurobiologically realistic determinants of self-organized criticality in networks of spiking neurons

    PLOS Computational Biology 7:e1002038.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002038

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Rudelt L
    2. González Marx D
    3. Wibral M
    4. Priesemann V

    (2021) Embedding optimization reveals long-lasting history dependence in neural spiking activity

    PLOS Computational Biology 17:e1008927.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008927

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Schreiber T

    (2000) Measuring information transfer

    Physical Review Letters 85:461–464.

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.461

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Schroeter MS
    2. Charlesworth P
    3. Kitzbichler MG
    4. Paulsen O
    5. Bullmore ET

    (2015) Emergence of rich-club topology and coordinated dynamics in development of hippocampal functional networks in vitro

    Journal of Neuroscience 35:5459–5470.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4259-14.2015

    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Selinger JV
    2. Kulagina NV
    3. O’Shaughnessy TJ
    4. Ma W
    5. Pancrazio JJ

    (2007) Methods for characterizing interspike intervals and identifying bursts in neuronal activity

    Journal of Neuroscience Methods 162:64–71.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.12.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Shapiro SS
    2. Wilk MB

    (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)

    Biometrika 52:591.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/2333709

    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Shew WL
    2. Yang H
    3. Yu S
    4. Roy R
    5. Plenz D

    (2011) Information capacity and transmission are maximized in balanced cortical networks with neuronal avalanches

    The Journal of Neuroscience 31:55–63.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4637-10.2011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Shimono M
    2. Beggs JM

    (2015) Functional clusters, hubs, and communities in the cortical microconnectome

    Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y) 25:3743–3757.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu252

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Shorten DP
    2. Spinney RE
    3. Lizier JT
    4. Marinazzo D

    (2021) Estimating transfer entropy in continuous time between neural spike trains or other event-based data

    PLOS Computational Biology 17:e1008054.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008054

    • Google Scholar
73. Software

    1. Shorten D

    (2022) cell_cultures

    Software Heritage.

    https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:c37a7f336c6ead1deb9bf62f0b5202014a51384c;origin=https://bitbucket.org/dpshorten/cell_cultures;visit=swh:1:snp:9afa324ac020f1c169cae2c8f220a29e1ff11375;anchor=swh:1:rev:8ee5e519da5cb90590865e9a692b96ad7e68a69e
74. 1. Shovon MHI
    2. Nandagopal N
    3. Vijayalakshmi R
    4. Du JT
    5. Cocks B

    (2016) Directed connectivity analysis of functional brain networks during cognitive activity using transfer entropy

    Neural Processing Letters 45:807–824.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-016-9506-1

    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Sober SJ
    2. Sponberg S
    3. Nemenman I
    4. Ting LH

    (2018) Millisecond spike timing codes for motor control

    Trends in Neurosciences 41:644–648.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2018.08.010

    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Spinney RE
    2. Lizier JT

    (2018) Characterizing information-theoretic storage and transfer in continuous time processes

    Physical Review. E 98:012314.

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.98.012314

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Stetter O
    2. Battaglia D
    3. Soriano J
    4. Geisel T

    (2012) Model-free reconstruction of excitatory neuronal connectivity from calcium imaging signals

    PLOS Computational Biology 8:e1002653.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002653

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Stramaglia S
    2. Wu GR
    3. Pellicoro M
    4. Marinazzo D

    (2012) Expanding the transfer entropy to identify information circuits in complex systems

    Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 86:066211.

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.066211

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Timme N
    2. Ito S
    3. Myroshnychenko M
    4. Yeh FC
    5. Hiolski E
    6. Hottowy P
    7. Beggs JM

    (2014) Multiplex networks of cortical and hippocampal neurons revealed at different timescales

    PLOS ONE 9:e115764.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115764

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Timme NM
    2. Ito S
    3. Myroshnychenko M
    4. Nigam S
    5. Shimono M
    6. Yeh F-C
    7. Hottowy P
    8. Litke AM
    9. Beggs JM
    10. Pillow JW

    (2016) High-degree neurons feed cortical computations

    PLOS Computational Biology 12:e1004858.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004858

    • Google Scholar
81. Conference

    1. Wagenaar D
    2. DeMarse TB
    3. Potter SM

    (2005) Meabench: A toolset for multi-electrode data acquisition and on-line analysis

    2nd International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2005. pp. 518–521.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/CNE.2005.1419673

    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Wagenaar DA
    2. Nadasdy Z
    3. Potter SM

    (2006a) Persistent dynamic attractors in activity patterns of cultured neuronal networks

    Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 73:051907.

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.73.051907

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
83. 1. Wagenaar DA
    2. Pine J
    3. Potter SM

    (2006b) An extremely rich repertoire of bursting patterns during the development of cortical cultures

    BMC Neuroscience 7:11.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-7-11

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
84. 1. Wibral M
    2. Rahm B
    3. Rieder M
    4. Lindner M
    5. Vicente R
    6. Kaiser J

    (2011) Transfer entropy in magnetoencephalographic data: quantifying information flow in cortical and cerebellar networks

    Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 105:80–97.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.11.006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Wibral M
    2. Lizier JT
    3. Vögler S
    4. Priesemann V
    5. Galuske R

    (2014a) Local active information storage as a tool to understand distributed neural information processing

    Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 8:1.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2014.00001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
86. Book

    1. Wibral M
    2. Vicente R
    3. Lizier JT

    (2014b) Directed Information Measures in Neuroscience

    Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54474-3

    • Google Scholar
87. 1. Wibral M
    2. Finn C
    3. Wollstadt P
    4. Lizier JT
    5. Priesemann V

    (2017) Quantifying information modification in developing neural networks via partial information decomposition

    Entropy 19:494.

    https://doi.org/10.3390/e19090494

    • Google Scholar
88. 1. Wollstadt P
    2. Lizier JT
    3. Vicente R
    4. Finn C
    5. Martinez-Zarzuela M
    6. Mediano P
    7. Novelli L
    8. Wibral M

    (2019) Idtxl: The information dynamics toolkit xl: a python package for the efficient analysis of multivariate information dynamics in networks

    Journal of Open Source Software 4:1081.

    https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01081

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
89. 1. Zalesky A
    2. Fornito A
    3. Cocchi L
    4. Gollo LL
    5. van den Heuvel MP
    6. Breakspear M

    (2016) Connectome sensitivity or specificity: which is more important

    NeuroImage 142:407–420.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.035

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
90. 1. Zeraati R
    2. Priesemann V
    3. Levina A

    (2021) Self-organization toward criticality by synaptic plasticity

    Frontiers in Physics 9:103.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2021.619661

    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. David P Shorten

   Centre for Complex Systems, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing

   For correspondence

   david.shorten@sydney.edu.au

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2412-4705

2. Viola Priesemann

   Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Göttingen, Germany

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8905-5873

3. Michael Wibral

   Campus Institute for Dynamics of Biological Networks, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8010-5862

4. Joseph T Lizier

   Centre for Complex Systems, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9910-8972

• 468

  views

• 96

  downloads

• 4

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.