1. Cell Biology

P2Y1 purinergic receptor identified as a diabetes target in a small-molecule screen to reverse circadian β-cell failure

  1. Biliana Marcheva
  2. Benjamin J Weidemann
  3. Akihiko Taguchi
  4. Mark Perelis
  5. Kathryn Moynihan Ramsey
  6. Marsha V Newman
  7. Yumiko Kobayashi
  8. Chiaki Omura
  9. Jocelyn E Manning Fox
  10. Haopeng Lin
  11. Patrick E Macdonald
  12. Joseph Bass  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, United States
  2. Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, Hematological Science and Therapeutics, Department of Bio-Signal Analysis, Yamaguchi University, Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1, Japan
  3. Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc, United States
  4. Department of Pharmacology, Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, Canada
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75132
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Biliana Marcheva
  2. Benjamin J Weidemann
  3. Akihiko Taguchi
  4. Mark Perelis
  5. Kathryn Moynihan Ramsey
  6. Marsha V Newman
  7. Yumiko Kobayashi
  8. Chiaki Omura
  9. Jocelyn E Manning Fox
  10. Haopeng Lin
  11. Patrick E Macdonald
  12. Joseph Bass
(2022)
P2Y1 purinergic receptor identified as a diabetes target in a small-molecule screen to reverse circadian β-cell failure
eLife 11:e75132.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75132
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

The mammalian circadian clock drives daily oscillations in physiology and behavior through an autoregulatory transcription feedback loop present in central and peripheral cells. Ablation of the core clock within the endocrine pancreas of adult animals impairs the transcription and splicing of genes involved in hormone exocytosis and causes hypoinsulinemic diabetes. Here, we developed a genetically sensitized small-molecule screen to identify druggable proteins and mechanistic pathways involved in circadian β-cell failure. Our approach was to generate β-cells expressing a nanoluciferase reporter within the proinsulin polypeptide to screen 2640 pharmacologically active compounds and identify insulinotropic molecules that bypass the secretory defect in CRISPR-Cas9-targeted clock mutant β-cells. We validated hit compounds in primary mouse islets and identified known modulators of ligand-gated ion channels and G-protein-coupled receptors, including the antihelmintic ivermectin. Single-cell electrophysiology in circadian mutant mouse and human cadaveric islets revealed ivermectin as a glucose-dependent secretagogue. Genetic, genomic, and pharmacological analyses established the P2Y1 receptor as a clock-controlled mediator of the insulinotropic activity of ivermectin. These findings identify the P2Y1 purinergic receptor as a diabetes target based upon a genetically sensitized phenotypic screen.

Editor's evaluation

Circadian disruption is widespread in our modern 24/7 society, leading to an increased prevalence of common diseases including type 2 diabetes. The authors conducted an unbiased screen for small-molecule compounds that can restore the attenuated insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells caused by a disrupted circadian clock. They identified ivermectin and its clock-controlled target, the P2Y1 receptor, which regulate glucose-stimulated ca2+ influx and insulin secretion in β-cells. This discovery represents an important advance in our understanding of regulatory mechanisms of insulin secretion by cell-autonomous clocks in mouse and human β-cells and is of fundamental clinical importance in context of novel therapeutic targets for diabetes management.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75132.sa0

eLife digest

Circadian rhythms – ‘inbuilt’ 24-hour cycles – control many aspects of behaviour and physiology. In mammals, they operate in nearly all tissues, including those involved in glucose metabolism. Recent studies have shown that mice with faulty genes involved in circadian rhythms, the core clock genes, can develop diabetes.

Diabetes arises when the body struggles to regulate blood sugar levels. In healthy individuals, the hormone insulin produced by beta cells in the pancreas regulates the amount of sugar in the blood. But when beta cells are faulty and do not generate sufficient insulin levels, or when insulin lacks the ability to stimulate cells to take up glucose, diabetes can develop.

Marcheva, Weidemann, Taguchi et al. wanted to find out if diabetes caused by impaired clock genes could be treated by targeting pathways regulating the secretion of insulin. To do so, they tested over 2,500 potential drugs on genetically modified beta cells with faulty core clock genes. They further screened the drugs on mice with the same defect in their beta cells.

Marcheva et al. identified one potential compound, the anti-parasite drug ivermectin, which was able to restore the secretion of insulin. When ivermectin was applied to both healthy mice and mice with faulty beta cells, the drug improved the control over glucose levels by activating a specific protein receptor that senses molecules important for storing and utilizing energy.

The findings reveal new drug targets for treating forms of diabetes associated with deregulation of the pancreatic circadian clock. The drug screening strategy used in the study may also be applied to reveal mechanisms underlying other conditions associated with disrupted circadian clocks, including sleep loss and jetlag.

Introduction

Type 2 diabetes is an escalating epidemic involving gene-environment interactions that culminate in β-cell failure and insulin resistance. Recent epidemiological evidence has shown that shift work and sleep disturbance are environmental risk factors for diabetes (Perelis et al., 2016), while experimental genetic studies have shown that clock gene disruption within the endocrine pancreas causes hypoinsulinemic diabetes (Marcheva et al., 2010; Sadacca et al., 2011). At the molecular level, the circadian clock is composed of an autoregulatory transcriptional loop in which CLOCK/BMAL1 activate the repressors PER1/2/3 and CRY1/2, which feedback to inhibit CLOCK/BMAL1 in a cycle that repeats itself every 24 hr. An additional stabilizing loop involving ROR/REV-ERB regulates BMAL1 expression (Kim and Lazar, 2020). Recent chemical screens have identified new factors that modulate the core clock, including casein kinase 1 inhibitors that lengthen the circadian period through stabilizing PER proteins (Hirota et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2012), and a separate series of cryptochrome stabilizer compounds have been discovered that control glucose homeostasis in vivo (Hirota et al., 2012). Modulators of clock transcription factors may also control whole animal metabolism (He et al., 2016), though such compounds lack specificity (Dierickx et al., 2019).

Here, we developed a high-throughput small-molecule screen to identify insulinotropic compounds that act downstream of the circadian clock rather than through modulation of the core clock itself. We reasoned that compounds that enhance insulin secretion in the setting of β-cell clock disruption might in turn uncover therapeutic targets for more common forms of diabetes mellitus (Marcheva et al., 2010; Perelis et al., 2015; Marcheva et al., 2020; Moffat et al., 2017). To do so, we generated β-cells harboring a circadian gene mutation by CRISPR-Cas9 and co-expressing a luminescent insulin reporter that has previously been used to identify factors that either activated or repressed glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) in wild-type β-cell lines (Burns et al., 2015). In our screen of 2640 drug or drug-like compounds in circadian mutant β-cells, we identified the macrolide ivermectin (IVM) as an insulinotropic compound that activates the P2Y1 purinergic receptor. We further identified the P2Y1 receptor as a direct transcriptional target of the molecular clock factor BMAL1 and a potent regulator of glucose-dependent calcium signaling. Our findings establish a chemical genetic strategy to identify novel endocrine cell therapeutics.

Results

High-throughput screen for chemical modulators of insulin secretion in circadian mutant β-cell

Based upon our finding that circadian genes regulate β-cell function, we developed a chemical genetic screen to identify pathways that enhance glucose-coupled insulin secretion in a cell-based model of circadian β-cell failure (Figure 1A). We previously showed that clonal Bmal1-/- Beta-TC-6 β-cell lines recapitulate the secretory defects observed in primary clock-deficient islets (Marcheva et al., 2010; Perelis et al., 2015; Marcheva et al., 2020). We next generated stable WT and Bmal1-/- β-cell lines with a luciferase readout for insulin secretion using an insulin-NanoLuciferase (NanoLuc)-expressing lentivirus (Figure 1B). We validated the direct correspondence between insulin-NanoLuc bioluminescence and levels of peptide secretion under increasing physiological concentrations of glucose (2–20 mM; R2 = 0.8937; Figure 1C). We further confirmed impaired insulin secretion by reduced bioluminescence in Bmal1-/- compared to WT β-cell lines expressing insulin-NanoLuc in response to stimulatory concentrations of glucose (20 mM), potassium chloride, forskolin, and the phosphodiesterase inhibitor 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX) (Figure 1D). We also validated the use of the DAG mimetic phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) as a positive control for the screen (Figure 1D–F; Perelis et al., 2015). A feasibility test with a Z'-factor score of 0.69 indicated a significant separation between the distribution of bioluminescent signal from the positive (10 μM PMA + 20 mM glucose) and negative (20 mM glucose) controls, suggesting that the assay provides a suitable platform for a high-throughput screen (Figure 1F; Zhang et al., 1999).

Figure 1
Download asset Open asset
High-throughput screen for chemical modulators of insulin secretion in circadian mutant β-cells.

(A) Flow chart of ‘phenotype’-driven cell-based genetic screening platform to identify molecules and pathways that enhance insulin secretion during circadian β-cell failure. (B) Schematic of insulin-NanoLuciferase (NanoLuc) fusion construct, with bioluminescence detected in the supernatant as a proxy for insulin secretion. (C) Correlation between insulin-NanoLuc bioluminescence and insulin values measured by ELISA in response to a range of glucose concentrations (2–20 mM; R2 = 0.8937). (D) Insulin-NanoLuc bioluminescence following 1 hr exposure to 20 mM glucose, 30 mM KCl, and 20 mM glucose plus 2.5 µM forskolin, 500 µM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), or 10 µM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) in WT and Bmal1-/- insulin-NanoLuc Beta-TC-6 cells (n = 3–10 experimental repeats/condition). (E) Drug screen design. Insulin-NanoLuc-expressing Beta-TC-6 Bmal1-/- cells were plated in nine 384-well plates prior to exposure to 10 µM of each of the 2640 compounds from the Spectrum Collection in combination with 20 mM glucose. Negative (20 mM glucose alone) and positive (20 mM glucose plus 10 µM PMA) controls were included on each plate. (F) Drug screen feasibility test comparing negative (20 mM glucose only) and positive (20 mM glucose plus PMA) controls (n = 3 experimental repeats) (Z'-factor = 0.69). All values represent mean ± SEM. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001.

Identification and validation of high-throughput screen lead compounds in murine islets at high and low glucose concentrations

We next used insulin-NanoLuc-expressing Bmal1-/- β-cell lines to screen 2640 drugs and drug-like molecules from the Spectrum Collection (MicroSource Discovery Systems, Inc, New Milford, CT) to identify compounds that enhance insulin secretion (Figure 1E). Insulin-NanoLuc-expressing Bmal1-/- Beta-TC-6 cells were plated at 40,000 cells/well in a total of nine 384-well plates, incubated for 3 days, and then treated for 1 hr with either (i) 20 mM glucose alone (negative control that elicits reduced insulin secretion in Bmal1-/- cells), (ii) 20 mM glucose plus 10 μM of one of the 2640 compounds, or (iii) 20 mM glucose plus 10 μM PMA (positive control known to enhance insulin secretion in both Bmal1-/- mouse islets and Beta-TC-6 cells) (Perelis et al., 2015). Luciferase intensity from the supernatant was measured following exposure to NanoGlo Luciferase Assay Substrate (Figure 1E).

We initially identified 19 hit compounds that both significantly enhanced insulin secretion and elicited a response of greater than 3 standard deviations from the mean (Z-score > 3) with more than a 1.25-fold increase, exceeding the upper 99% confidence interval of the negative control (Figure 2A, Figure 2—figure supplement 1A, Supplementary file 1). Of these, seven were excluded from further analysis because of reported toxic effects or lack of availability of the compound (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). The remaining 12 hit compounds mediate activity of ligand-gated cell surface receptors and ion channels that stimulate second messenger signaling cascades (Figure 2B and C; Gaulton et al., 2010; Carrano et al., 2017). Of these, four target ion channels (tacrine hydrochloride, suloctidil, dyclonine hydrochloride, and IVM) (Figure 2B and C; Karlsson and Ahrén, 1992; Chatelain et al., 1984; Khanna et al., 2011; Chen and Kubo, 2018; Freeman et al., 1988; de Gaetano et al., 1976; Kornhuber et al., 2008; Sahdeo et al., 2014; Roghani et al., 1999; Ikeda, 2003). Five target seven-transmembrane G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) that signal through phospholipase C (PLC) and diacylglycerol (DAG) to activate insulin secretion and β-cell gene transcription (benzalkonium chloride, carbachol, isoetharine mesylate, pipamperone, and IVM) (Figure 2B and C; Chen and Kubo, 2018; Higashijima et al., 1990; Rinne et al., 2015; Bierman, 1983; Van Craenenbroeck et al., 2006; Nagata et al., 2019; Ratajewski et al., 2015; Ohtani et al., 2011). Similar to the hit compounds of our screen, our previous results showed that carbachol, a muscarinic Gq-coupled receptor agonist, and the DAG mimetic PMA rescue insulin secretion in Bmal1-/- islets (Perelis et al., 2015). Four additional hit compounds act as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, promoting enhanced glucose-dependent insulin secretion in response to acetylcholine through the muscarinic GPCRs, as well as the ionotropic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (tyrothricin, tomatine, carbachol, and tacrine hydrochloride) (Figure 2B and C; Changeux et al., 1969; Milner et al., 2011; Rosenberry et al., 2008; Marco and Carreiras, 2003; Lang and Staiger, 2016; Shih et al., 2009). One compound has been shown to promote insulin secretion by inhibition of the mitochondrial protein tyrosine phosphatase PTPM1 (alexidine hydrochloride) (Figure 2B and C; Doughty-Shenton et al., 2010; Nath et al., 2015), and another likely affects β-cell function by signaling through the mineralocorticoid receptor (deoxycorticosterone) (Figure 2B and C; Lu et al., 2006). Finally, in addition to ion channels and GPCRs, the macrolide IVM has also been shown to signal in micromolar concentrations though several ionotropic receptors, including purinergic, GABAergic, and glycine receptors, as well as through the farnesoid X nuclear receptor (Chen and Kubo, 2018; Dawson et al., 2000; Soltani et al., 2011).

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Identification and validation of high-throughput screen lead compounds in murine islets at high and low glucose concentrations.

(A) Significant Z-scores (>3 standard deviations) and fold changes (>1.25-fold increase) for all 2640 screened compounds, with hit compounds indicated in blue. (B) Top 12 hit compounds identified from screen with a fold increase > 1.25 and a Z-score > 3, which were selected for further analysis. Known functions and published molecular pathways targeted by these compounds are indicated. (C) Model of potential mechanisms of action of the top 12 hit compounds to affect insulin secretion in the β-cell. (D) Glucose-responsive insulin secretion by ELISA at 2 mM and 20 mM glucose in WT mouse islets following exposure to four lead candidate compounds (n = 3–11 mice/compound). (E) Ivermectin (IVM) dose-response curve (n = 6–8 experimental repeats/dose), ranging from 0.078 µM to 80 µM IVM, in insulin-NanoLuciferase-expressing Beta-TC-6 cells. Shaded area represents 95% confidence intervals for the LOESS curve. All values represent mean ± SEM. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

10 of these 12 hit compounds were not considered for further analysis because of either the high dose required to achieve insulin secretion (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B) or because they augmented insulin release in low basal glucose (2 mM) in intact WT mouse primary islets (Figure 2D). One of the remaining compounds induces hepatotoxicity after prolonged use (tacrine hydrochloride) (Galisteo et al., 2000). We therefore focused our attention on IVM due to its dose-dependent enhancement of GSIS in insulin-NanoLuc-expressing Beta-TC-6 cells, as well as its robust rescue of insulin secretion in Bmal1-/- islets (Figure 2D and E).

Lead compound ivermectin regulates glucose-stimulated calcium flux and insulin exocytosis in Bmal1 mutant islets

To test whether IVM drives GSIS in β-cell lines and primary mouse islets, we first assessed the impact of both acute treatment (1 hr) and overnight exposure (24 hr) with 10 μM IVM on the ability of WT β-cells and mouse islets to secrete insulin (Figure 3A, Figure 3—figure supplement 1A). Consistent with our initial bioluminescence assay, we observed that IVM enhanced insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent manner following both 1 hr IVM exposure and 24 hr pretreatment with IVM in β-cell lines and WT mouse islets, suggesting that both acute and longer-term exposure to IVM enhance β-cell function (Figure 3A, Figure 3—figure supplement 1A). Since there was not a significant increase in insulin secretion with overnight (approximately twofold) compared to acute (~1.5–1.6-fold) IVM exposure, further analysis of IVM as a potentiator of insulin secretion was performed only with acute treatment.

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Effect of lead compound ivermectin (IVM) on glucose-stimulated insulin exocytosis and calcium flux from WT and circadian mutant β-cells.

(A) Insulin secretion (expressed as % content) assessed by ELISA at 2 mM and 20 mM glucose in WT mouse islets in response to 1 hr 10 µM IVM treatment or 24 hr 10 µM IVM pretreatment (n = 5 mice). Data was analyzed by two-way ANOVA and false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple testing. (B) Insulin secretion as assessed by ELISA from islets isolated from 8-month-old pancreas-specific Bmal1 knockout and Bmal1flx/flx mice in the presence or absence of 10 µM IVM (n = 10–11 mice/genotype). (C) Perifusion analysis of insulin secretion in islets from pancreas-specific Bmal1 knockout (PdxCre;Bmal1flx/flx) and Bmal1flx/flx mice in response to 10 µM IVM in the presence of 20 mM glucose (n = 3 mice/genotype). (D) Insulin secretion as assessed by ELISA from islets isolated from 9- to 12-month-old male Cry1-/-;Cry2-/- knockout and Cry1+/-;Cry2+/- heterozygous control mice in the presence or absence of ± µM IVM (n = 4 mice/genotype). (E) Capacitance measurements in β-cells from PdxCre;Bmal1flx/flx and Bmal1flx/flx mouse islets treated with 10 µM IVM (n = 4–5 mice/genotype, 5–16 cells per mouse). Asterisks denote significance between PdxCre;Bmal1flx/flx and PdxCre;Bmal1flx/flx + IVM; plus symbols denote significance between Bmal1flx/flx and PdxCre;Bmal1flx/flx for all depolarization numbers indicated. */+ p<0.05. (F) Capacitance measurements in β-cells from human islets treated with 10 µM IVM (n = 3 donors, 7–11 cells per donor). Capacitance and calcium data were analyzed by two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. All values represent mean ± SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Chemical energy from ATP generated by glucose metabolism within the β-cell triggers closure of the sulfonylurea-linked potassium channel, depolarization of the plasma membrane, and opening of voltage-gated calcium channels, leading to stimulus-secretion coupling. To assess the mechanism of IVM-induced insulin secretion, we next monitored real-time calcium influx using ratiometric fluorescence imaging in WT β-cells in the presence of both glucose and IVM. We observed an immediate and robust glucose-stimulated intracellular calcium response within 2 min of IVM stimulation (p<0.05) (Figure 3—figure supplement 1B). Importantly, this effect was only observed in the presence of high glucose, consistent with results of our initial NanoLuc 384-well plate screening and subsequent ELISA-based analyses of GSIS. In contrast, the Ca2+ channel inhibitor isradipine completely suppressed Ca2+ influx and insulin secretion (Figure 3—figure supplement 1C and D; Berjukow et al., 2000). To determine whether increased calcium influx corresponded with productive insulin release following IVM treatment, we used a dynamic perifusion system to directly measure NanoLuc activity in eluates harvested from IVM-treated β-cells every 2 min over the course of 30 min following stimulation with either 20 mM glucose or 20 mM glucose plus 10 µM IVM (Figure 3—figure supplement 1E). IVM significantly increased insulin release during the initial burst of secretion within the first 12 min post-stimulation (p<0.05) and continued to enhance insulin secretion during the remainder of the stimulation period (12–30 min), consistent with continuous release of reserve insulin granules (Rorsman and Renström, 2003).

Since our cell-based studies indicated that IVM stimulates GSIS within immortalized β-cell lines, we next sought to determine whether IVM restores insulin secretion in the context of circadian disruption within primary islets, which are composed of multiple hormone-releasing cell types (Arrojo E Drigo et al., 2020). To test this idea, we administered IVM to mouse islets isolated from pancreas-specific Bmal1-/- mice, revealing a 3.3-fold elevation of GSIS following exposure to the drug in the Bmal1 mutant islets (Figure 3B). Furthermore, perifusion experiments in islets from Bmal1 mutant mice revealed that IVM significantly increased insulin release during both the initial burst of secretion (first 12 min post-stimulation) and during the sustained release (12–30 min) in both WT and Bmal1 mutant islets (Figure 3C). Additionally, we observed a similar 2.9-fold increase in GSIS following administration of IVM to islets isolated from an independent mouse model of circadian disruption (Cry1-/-;Cry2-/- mice) (Figure 3D), suggesting that IVM ameliorates secretory defects caused by disruption of the circadian clock network. To determine if IVM can improve glucose homeostasis in diabetic animals, we next tested the effects of chronic IVM administration in the well-characterized C57BL/6-Ins2Akita/J Akita model of β-cell failure (Yoshioka et al., 1997). Daily intraperitoneal IVM (1.3 mg/kg body weight) was administered to Akita mice over a 14-day period (Jin et al., 2013), terminating in assessment of glucose tolerance and ex vivo GSIS. Treatment with IVM significantly improved glucose tolerance and augmented glucose-stimulated insulin release from islets isolated from these mice (Figure 3—figure supplement 1F and G). Given that our prior genomic and cell physiological studies have localized the β-cell defect in circadian mutant mice to impaired insulin exocytosis (Marcheva et al., 2020), and as IVM augmented insulin secretion in Bmal1 mutant islets, we next sought to determine whether IVM might enhance depolarization-induced exocytosis using electrophysiological analyses (Fu et al., 2019). We assessed cumulative capacitance, a measure of increased cell surface area as insulin granules fuse to the plasma membrane, in β-cells from islets of control and pancreas-specific Bmal1 mutant mice, as well as from human cadaveric islets. While Bmal1 mutant cells displayed reduced rates of exocytosis following direct depolarization (as indicated by reduced capacitance), 10 µM IVM treatment rescued the defect in Bmal1 mutant cells, increasing cumulative capacitance from 11.0 to 20.7 fF/pF after 10 consecutive depolarization steps (Figure 3E). IVM treatment also enhanced cumulative capacitance in human β-cells from 17.9 to 39.7 fF/pF (Figure 3F). Together, these data show that IVM augments β-cell early calcium influx in a glucose-dependent manner to promote increased vesicle fusion and release.

Purinergic receptor P2Y1 mediates IVM-induced insulin exocytosis

Several of the predicted targets of the insulinotropic compounds from our screen, including IVM, involve second-messenger signaling, raising the possibility that circadian disruption may be overcome by augmenting hormonal or metabolic factors that promote peptide exocytosis. IVM is a readily absorbable and potent derivative of avermectin B1 that allosterically regulates several different types of cell surface receptors, including purinergic and GABA receptors, as well as nuclear transcription factors such as the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) (Jin et al., 2013; Khakh et al., 1999; González Canga et al., 2008; Estrada-Mondragon and Lynch, 2015). Since IVM augments insulin secretion in Bmal1-/- cells, we hypothesized that the expression of putative IVM targets may be reduced during circadian disruption. We first identified the purinergic receptor P2Y1 (P2ry1) as the most highly expressed putative IVM target in wild-type β-cells (Figure 4A). We then observed that P2ry1 was one of the most highly downregulated targets in Bmal1-/- cells, with mRNA expression levels reduced by ~3.1-fold (adjusted p=10–55; Figure 4A, Figure 4—figure supplement 1A; GSE146916). We found decreased levels and loss in rhythmicity of P2ry1 in synchronized Bmal1-/- pseudoislets (Figure 4—figure supplement 1B). BMAL1 chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing in Beta-TC-6 cells further revealed enrichment of BMAL1 chromatin binding within enhancer regions 266–41 kb upstream of the P2ry1 gene transcription start site (GSE69889; Figure 4A, Figure 4—figure supplement 1A). Finally, analysis of RNA-sequencing data from human islets (SRA accession ERP017126) indicates that P2RY1 expression is enriched within β-cells among hormone-secreting cell types, with little to no detectable expression in the glucagon-secreting α cells (Figure 4—figure supplement 1C; Segerstolpe et al., 2016). Together, these data reveal direct rhythmic control of the P2ry1 gene by the β-cell circadian clock.

Figure 4 with 2 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Purinergic receptor P2Y1 is required for ivermectin (IVM) to augment insulin exocytosis.

(A) Venn diagram of BMAL1 binding sites identified by ChIP-sequencing overlapping with differentially expressed genes identified by RNA-sequencing in Bmal1-/-β-cell line compared to control cell line (top). Browser tracks and bar graph showing decreased expression of P2ry1 gene in Bmal1-/- cells compared to controls. BMAL1 binding sites upstream of the P2ry1 gene are also indicated (bottom). (B) Bioluminescence from WT insulin-NanoLuciferase pseudoislets in response to 10 µM IVM and/or 10 µM of the P2Y1 antagonist MRS2179 (n = 3–8 experiments, 3–15 experimental repeats/experiment). (C) Ratiometric determination of intracellular Ca2+ using Fura2-AM dye in WT Beta-TC-6 cells stimulated in the presence or absence of 10 µM IVM (n = 3–7 experiments, 4–19 experimental repeats/experiment). (D) Insulin secretion by ELISA in pseudoislets from P2ry1 KOs and control WT and Bmal1-/- Beta-TC-6 cells (n = 4 experiments, two experimental repeats/experiment). p-Values were determined by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests following two-way ANOVA. (E) First two principal components (PC1 and PC2) following unbiased principal component analysis (PCA) of DESeq2 normalized counts in WT, WT + IVM, P2yr1 KO, and P2yr1 KO cells (n = 4 per group). (F) Mean log2-transformed DESeq2-normalized counts in WT, WT + IVM, P2yr1 KO, and P2yr1 KO cells (n = 4 per group) at differentially expressed (1.5-fold, adjusted p-value<0.05) transcripts identified between WT and WT + IVM treated cells. All values represent mean ± SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Based upon evidence that IVM targets purinergic receptors (Weng et al., 2008; Priel and Silberberg, 2004; Bowler et al., 2003; Hansen et al., 2008), that the predominant purinergic receptor on β-cells is P2Y1, and that BMAL1 specifically controls P2ry1 amongst the purinergic receptor family in the β-cell (Figure 4A, Figure 4—figure supplement 1A and B), we sought to test the functional role of the P2Y1 receptor in the insulinotropic action of IVM. Pharmacological inhibition of P2Y1 using a subtype-specific inhibitor, the nucleotide analog MRS2179, in the presence of both high glucose and 10 μM IVM resulted in a 52% reduction in insulin secretion by bioluminescence and a reduction in calcium influx to levels similar to those observed during high glucose alone, as assessed by Fura2-AM ratiometric determination of intracellular calcium (Figure 4B and C). In addition to evidence that pharmacological blockade of P2Y1 receptor signaling attenuates IVM activity, we also tested the requirement of P2Y1 receptor signaling following CRISPR-Cas9-mediated knockout of the P2Y1 receptor in both WT and Bmal1-/-β-cells (Figure 4—figure supplement 2A). While IVM enhanced GSIS in WT and Bmal1-/-β-cells 1.6- and 1.8-fold, respectively, IVM did not significantly enhance GSIS in cells lacking the P2Y1 receptor (Figure 4D). Similar to the pharmacological findings with the P2Y1 antagonist MRS2179, these results demonstrate a requirement for P2Y1 in IVM-induced GSIS.

P2Y1 receptor signaling involves activation of Ca2+ entry and intracellular release, which results in both acute stimulation of insulin granule trafficking and activation of transcription factors that may be involved in β-cell function (Léon et al., 2005; Khan et al., 2014; Balasubramanian et al., 2010). To analyze gene expression changes induced by P2Y1 activation, we performed RNA-sequencing to compare the IVM response within both WT and P2ry1-/- β-cells following stimulation with glucose or glucose plus IVM. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using log-transformed count data from the top 500 most variable genes across all samples (Love et al., 2014). This revealed distinct patterns in mRNA expression between IVM- and control-treated WT cells along PC2, while there was no separation between IVM- and control-treated P2ry1-/- β-cells, suggesting that P2Y1 is required for IVM-mediated transcriptional changes in β-cells (Figure 4E). In WT cells, IVM induced differential expression of 65 transcripts (1.5-fold change, adjusted p-value<0.05), including upregulation of the immediate early gene Fos (Murphy et al., 1991) and downregulation of Aldolase B, whose expression has been linked to reduced insulin secretion in human islets (Gerst et al., 2018; Figure 4F, Figure 4—figure supplement 2B, Supplementary file 2). Strikingly, none of these transcripts were significantly altered by IVM in the P2ry1-/- β-cells (all adjusted p-value>0.05) (Figure 4F, Figure 4—figure supplement 2B, Supplementary file 2). Taken together, these data suggest that the circadian clock program controls P2Y1 expression to modulate GSIS and highlight the utility of a genetic-sensitized drug screen for identification of therapeutic targets in circadian dysregulation and diabetes.

Discussion

We have identified an unexpected role for the P2Y1 receptor as a BMAL1-controlled insulinotropic factor required for enhanced β-cell glucose-stimulated Ca2+ influx and insulin secretion in response to IVM. While P2Y receptors have been previously implicated in calcium and insulin secretory dynamics in β-cells, modulation has been primarily demonstrated using agonists that mimic ATP/ADP derivatives that have deleterious effects on thrombosis (Léon et al., 2005; Khan et al., 2014; Balasubramanian et al., 2010; Gąsecka et al., 2020). Little is known about P2Y1 targeting in disease states, such as circadian disruption and/or type 2 diabetes, or whether P2Y1 is controlled at a transcriptional level. Our evidence that P2Y1 is expressed under control of the circadian clock derives from analyses at the level of both chromatin binding by the core clock factor BMAL1 and genome-wide differential RNA expression analysis in circadian mutants. Intriguingly, P2X and P2Y receptors are required for Ca2+ signaling in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (Lommen et al., 2017; Svobodova et al., 2018), yet their role in circadian regulation of peripheral tissues has not been well studied. Our data suggests that IVM action requires the presence of P2Y1 receptors in β-cells since functional ablation of the P2Y1 receptor attenuates the effect of IVM on insulin secretion in both wild-type and circadian mutant β-cells (Figure 4D). Our analyses reveal that pharmacological enhancement of P2Y1 receptor activity may therefore bypass pathological and circadian alterations in expression of the P2Y1 receptor in β-cells to restore insulin secretion. Recently, the P2Y1 receptor was implicated in nutrient- and ATP/ADP-dependent regulation of insulin release through an adipocyte-islet axis, further suggesting that P2RY1 may play a role in physiological regulation of islet hormone release (Prentice et al., 2021). Future studies will be required to determine whether IVM affects paracrine ATP/ADP release to affect P2RY1 or whether IVM directly binds purinergic receptors in the β-cell. One possibility is that IVM may augment P2X-P2Y1 crosstalk to drive insulin secretion, which has been shown to drive Ca2+ and P2Y1-dependent activation of other cell types (Weng et al., 2008; Woehrle et al., 2019).

Previous physiological and transcriptomic studies have shown that circadian regulation of insulin exocytosis involves control of the expression and activity of cell-surface receptors and second messenger systems (Perelis et al., 2015; Gil-Lozano et al., 2014). We based our drug screen on the idea that modulators of insulin secretion in cells that lack a functional clock would complement prior genomic analyses revealing circadian control of peptidergic hormone exocytosis and also to provide proof of principle that the clock can be leveraged to sensitize screening for new chemical modulators of β-cell function. This approach identified Ca2+-dependent pathways as a potential route to ameliorate circadian disruption and enhance GSIS. Previous small-molecule screens have identified glucose-dependent insulinotropic compounds in wild-type cells (Burns et al., 2015). However, several of these compounds, including the anti-inflammatory bufexamac and anti-giardiasis drug lobendazole, were found to be ineffective or even inhibitory in our circadian mutant screen (Supplementary file 1). In the future, high-throughput screens may lead to more personalized therapeutics through comparison of insulinotropic compounds identified using cells without known mutations versus those discovered in cells harboring monogenic or polygenic diabetes variants. Several of the compounds identified in our screen have been used in disease treatment and have known mechanisms of action, including the cholinergic activators carbachol and tacrine (Linn et al., 1989; Crismon, 1994). The identification of these compounds in our screen raises the intriguing possibility of using drug derivatives related to these molecules for type 2 diabetes treatment, particularly in the context of circadian/sleep disruption.

The study of transcriptional rhythms across the 24 hr circadian cycle has previously revealed a diverse landscape of clock-controlled genes and pathways (Zhang et al., 2014). Despite the identification of thousands of tissue-specific and clock-controlled transcripts, limited advances have been made in utilizing this information to treat diseases associated with circadian disruption, including type 2 diabetes. One approach to this challenge has been to intervene and restore the molecular clock program using pharmacology (Nobiletin) (He et al., 2016), micronutrient supplementation (NAD+ precursors) (Levine et al., 2020; Sato et al., 2017), or enforced behavioral rhythms (such as time-restricted feeding) (Sutton et al., 2018). However, it remains unclear how altering the whole-body clock will affect nutritional and hormonal dynamics at a cellular level. Another approach has been to directly target clock-controlled genes with known function in health and disease (Lamia et al., 2008) or to look at gain/loss of circadian control in health versus disease (Petrenko et al., 2020a). This approach requires an understanding of gene function within a given tissue, and thus limits the identification of novel therapeutic targets. In the studies performed here, we sought to address the challenge of connecting clock control of transcription with druggable targets by using an unbiased small-molecule drug screen, in tandem with functional genomics, to elucidate mechanisms of insulin secretory dynamics. Since the circadian timing system has been shown to not only regulate the function of mature β-cells, but also the regenerative capacity of islets in both the context of the mouse (Petrenko et al., 2020b) and in human embryonic stem cell differentiation (Alvarez-Dominguez et al., 2020), molecules identified in cell-based genetic screens may provide broad applicability as therapeutics.

Materials and methods

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Gene (Mus musculus)Bmal1NCBIGene ID: 11865 
Gene (M. musculus)Cry1NCBIGene ID: 12952 
Gene (M. musculus)Cry2NCBIGene ID: 12953 
Gene (M. musculus)P2ry1NCBIGene ID: 18441 
Strain (M. musculus), strain background (C57BL6J)PdxCre;Bmal1flx/flxPMID:20562852PdxCre;Bmal1flx/flxPancreas-specific Bmal1 mutant mice
Strain (M. musculus), strain background (C57BL6J)Cry1-/-;Cry2-/-PMID:10518585Cry1-/-;Cry2-/-Whole-body Cry1 and Cry2 double knockout mice
Strain (M. musculus), strain background (C57BL6J)C57BL/6-Ins2Akita/JJackson Laboratory3548Spontaneous mutation in the insulin two gene leads to incorrect folding of the insulin protein
Monogenic mouse model for type 1 diabetes.
Biological sample (M. musculus)Primary pancreatic isletsNorthwestern UniversityFreshly isolated from mice
Biological sample (Homo sapiens)Primary pancreatic isletsAlberta Diabetes Institute Islet-Corehttps://www.isletcore.ca (R224, R225, R226)Freshly isolated from nondiabetic donors
Cell line (H. sapiens)HEK293TATCCCRL-11268Kidney cells
Cell line (M. musculus)Beta-TC-6ATCCCRL-11506Pancreatic β-cells
Cell line (M. musculus)Bmal1-/- Beta-TC-6PMID:21686102Bmal1-/- Beta-TC-6Pancreatic β-cells, mutant for Bmal1
Cell line (M. musculus)Insulin-NanoLuc-expressing Beta-TC-6This paperPancreatic β-cells, expressing Proinsulin-NanoLuc luminescent reporter
Cell line (M. musculus)Insulin-NanoLuc-expressing Bmal1-/- Beta-TC-6This paperPancreatic β-cells, mutant for Bmal1, expressing Proinsulin-NanoLuc luminescent reporter
Recombinant DNA reagentP2Y1 CRISPR/Cas9 KO plasmidSanta Cruz Biotechnologysc-422095Pool of three plasmids, encoding the Cas9 nuclease and a P2Y1-specific 20 nt guide RNA, targeting exon 1 of the mouse P2ry1 gene
Recombinant DNA reagentP2Y1 HDR plasmidSanta Cruz Biotechnologysc-422095-HDRPool of 2–3 plasmids, containing puromycin resistance gene and HDR templates, corresponding to the P2Y1 CRISPR/Cas9 KO plasmid cut sites
Recombinant DNA reagentProinsulin-NanoLuc in pLX304 lentivirus packaging plasmidAddgene62057Luminescent reporter of insulin secretion, mouse synthetic Ins2 insert
Recombinant DNA reagentpCMV-VSV-GAddgene8454Envelope vector
Recombinant DNA reagentpCMV delta R8.2Addgene12263Packaging vector
Chemical compound, drugSpectrum CollectionMicroSource Discovery Systems, IncSmall-molecule compound library, which consists of 2640 known drugs and drug-like molecules
Chemical compound, drugIvermectinTocris1260 
Chemical compound, drug(+)-BicucullineTocris130 
Chemical compound, drugMRS2179 tetrasodium saltTocris900 
Chemical compound, drugIsradipineCayman Chemical Company17536 
Chemical compound, drugPhorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)Sigma-AldrichP1585 
Chemical compound, drugCarbamoylcholine chlorideSigma-AldrichC4382-1G 
Chemical compound, drugForskolinSigma-AldrichF3917-10MG 
Chemical compound, drugD-GlucoseSigma-AldrichG7528-250G 
Chemical compound, drugPotassium chlorideSigma-AldrichP-5405 
Chemical compound, drug3-Isobutyl-1-methylxanthineSigma-AldrichI7018-250mg 
Chemical compound, drugTyrothricinSigma-AldrichT3000000 
Chemical compound, drugAlexidine hydrochlorideCayman Chemical Company13876 
Chemical compound, drugBenzalkonium chlorideSigma-Aldrich12060-5G 
Chemical compound, drugSuloctidilMicroSource Discovery Systems, Inc01501153 
Chemical compound, drugTomatineMicroSource Discovery Systems, Inc01504079 
Chemical compound, drugIsoetharine mesylateMicroSource Discovery Systems, Inc01505977 
Chemical compound, drugTacrine hydrochlorideMicroSource Discovery Systems, Inc02300104 
Chemical compound, drugPipamperoneMicroSource Discovery Systems, Inc01505690 
Chemical compound, drugDyclonine hydrochlorideMicroSource Discovery Systems, Inc01500268 
Chemical compound, drugDesoxycorticosterone acetateMicroSource Discovery Systems, Inc00300029 
Chemical compound, drugPuromycin dihydrochlorideSigma-AldrichP8833-25MG 
Chemical compound, drugCollagenase PSigma-AldrichC7657-100mg 
Chemical compound, drugBiocollMilliporeL6155 
Chemical compound, drug2-Hydroxypropyl-b-cyclodextrinSigma-AldrichH107-5G 
Chemical compound, drugFura-2InvitrogenF1201 
Chemical compound, drugPluronic F-127InvitrogenP3000MP 
Chemical compound, drugPenicillin-streptomycinGibco15-140-122 
Chemical compound, drugL-glutamineGibco25-030-081 
Commercial assay or kitLipofectamine 3000Thermo Fisher ScientificL3000015 
Commercial assay or kitNanoGlo Luciferase Assay SubstratePromegaN1110 
Commercial assay or kitUltra Sensitive Mouse Insulin ELISA KitCrystal Chem Inc90080 
Commercial assay or kitAutokit GlucoseWako-Fujifilm997-03001 
Commercial assay or kitDirect-zol RNA Microprep kitZymo ResearchR2062 
Commercial assay or kitHigh Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription KitApplied Biosystems4368813 
Commercial assay or kitiTaq Universal SYBR Green SupermixApplied Biosystems1725125 
Commercial assay or kitNEBNext Ultra Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for IlluminaNew England BiolabsE7760L 
Commercial assay or kitNEBNext Library Quant Kit for IlluminaNew England BiolabsE7630L 
Commercial assay or kitQuick Start Bradford Protein AssayBio-Rad500-0116 
Sequence-based reagentβ-actin FThis paperPCR primers5′-TGCTCTGGCTCCTAGCACCATGAAGATCAA-3′
Sequence-based reagentβ-actin RThis paperPCR primers5′-AAACGCAGCTCAGTAACAGTCCGCCTAGAA-3′
Sequence-based reagentP2ry1 FThis paperPCR primers5′-TTATGTCAGCGTGCTGGTGT-3′
Sequence-based reagentP2ry1 RThis paperPCR primers5′-ACGTGGTGTCATAGCAGGTG-3′
AntibodyAnti-P2Y1, mouse monoclonalSanta Cruzsc-377324WB (1:500)
AntibodyAnti-β-ACTIN, rabbit monoclonalCell SignalingCST 4970WB (1:4000)
Software, algorithmSTARPMID:23104886RRID:SCR_004463 
Software, algorithmRSEMPMID:21816040RRID:SCR_013027 
Software, algorithmDESeq2 package in RPMID:25516281RRID:SCR_015687 
Software, algorithmPheatmap package in R RRID:SCR_016418 
Software, algorithmGraphPad PrismGraphPadRRID:SCR_002798 
Software, algorithmSRA-Toolkithttps://trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/sra/sra.cgi?view=software 
Software, algorithmSeurat in package in RPMID:34062119RRID:SCR_007322 
Software, algorithmJTK_CyclePMID:20876817RRID:SCR_017962 
OtherDulbecco’s modified Eagle’s mediumGibco90-013-pb 
OtherFetal bovine serumBio-TechneS11550 
OtherRIPA bufferSigma-AldrichR0278-50ML 
OtherTri ReagentMolecular Research Center, IncNC9277980 
OtherComplete Mini EDTA-Free Protease InhibitorRoche4693159001 
OtherPhoStopRoche4906837001 
OtherNitrocellulose membranesBio-Rad1620112 

Reagents

IVM, (+)-bicuculline, and MRS2179 tetrasodium salt were obtained from Tocris (R&D Systems, Inc, Minneapolis, MN). Isradipine and alexidine hydrochloride were purchased from Cayman Chemical Company (Ann Arbor, MI). PMA, carbamoylcholine chloride (carbachol), forskolin, tyrothricin, and benzalkonium chloride were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Suloctidil, tomatine, isoetharine mesylate, tacrine hydrochloride, pipamperone, dyclonine hydrochloride, and desoxycorticosterone acetate were purchased from MicroSource Discovery Systems, Inc.

Animals

Male WT C57BL6J mice and C57BL/6-Ins2Akita/J mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). PdxCre;Bmal1flx/flx and Cry1-/-;Cry2-/- mice were produced and maintained on C57BL6J background at the Northwestern University Center for Comparative Medicine (Protocols IS00000466, IS00003253, IS00008732, IS0005838) (Peek et al., 2013; Vitaterna et al., 1999). Unless otherwise stated, animals were maintained on a 12:12 light:dark cycle and allowed free access to water and regular chow. All animal care and use procedures were conducted in accordance with regulation of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Northwestern University.

Cell culture

Request a detailed protocol

Beta-TC-6 cells were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA) (CRL-11506), and Bmal1-/- Beta-TC-6 β-cell lines were previously derived as described (Marcheva et al., 2020). Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Gibco, Aramillo, TX) supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum (Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco), and 1% L-glutamine (Gibco) at 37°C with 5% CO2. Culture medium was exchanged every 2–3 days. All cells used in experiments were at <15 passages. Cells were routinely checked for mycoplasma contamination.

Generation of WT and Bmal1-/- Beta-TC-6 cells stably expressing insulin-NanoLuc

Request a detailed protocol

We used the proinsulin-NanoLuc plasmid (David Altshuler, Addgene plasmid #62057, proinsulin-NanoLuc in pLX304) to provide a low-cost, scalable, and rapid method to detect insulin secretion. The gene encoding NanoLuc was cloned into the C-peptide portion of mouse proinsulin such that cleavage within insulin vesicles by pH-sensitive prohormone convertase results in the co-secretion of NanoLuc with endogenous insulin in a stimulus-dependent manner (Burns et al., 2015). The pLX304 lentivirus packaging plasmid containing the proinsulin-NanoLuc construct was transfected into HEK293T (ATCC CRL-11268) cells with pCMV-VSVG (envelope vector, Addgene plasmid #8454) and pCMV delta R8.2 (packaging vector, Addgene plasmid #12263). Supernatant containing lentivirus particles was harvested 48 hr after transfection. Beta-TC-6 and Bmal1-/- Beta-TC-6 cells were infected with insulin-NanoLuc lentivirus, and stably expressing cells were selected by treating with puromycin (2 µg/ml, 2 days).

CRISPR-mediated P2ry1 deletion in WT and Bmal1-/- Beta-TC-6 cells

Request a detailed protocol

Exon 1 of the mouse P2yr1 gene was deleted in WT and Bmal1-/- Beta-TC-6 cells by CRISPR-Cas9 and homology-directed repair (HDR). Cells were co-transfected with guide RNA, P2Y1 CRISPR/Cas9 KO, and P2Y1 HDR plasmids (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, sc-422095 and sc-422095-HDR) by Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Amarillo, TX). The locations of the three sites targeted for ablation by the P2Y1 CRISPR/Cas9 KO plasmids are indicated in Figure 4A. After 48 hr of transfection, stably integrated clones were selected for puromycin resistance (puromycin dihydrochloride, Sigma-Aldrich). RNA and protein were extracted from these colonies, and P2ry1 expression was assessed by qPCR and Western blot.

High-throughput screen for drugs to restore insulin secretion in Bmal1-/- β-cells and insulin secretion assays

Request a detailed protocol

The Spectrum Collection small-molecule compound library (MicroSource Discovery Systems, Inc), which consists of 2640 known drugs and drug-like molecules, was screened for compounds that augment insulin secretion in Bmal1-/- Beta-TC-6 cells. Insulin-NanoLuc-expressing Bmal1-/- Beta-TC-6 cells (40,000 cells/well) were placed into 384-well plates and cultured for 3 days at 37°C and 5% CO2. The cells were washed once and incubated in KRB buffer containing 0 mM glucose for 1 hr. Then, KRB buffer containing 20 mM glucose in addition to the small molecules (10 µM) were added, and the cells were incubated for 1 hr. As a negative control, 16 wells received KRB buffer with only 20 mM glucose, which fails to elicit appropriate insulin secretion in Bmal1-/- cells, and as a positive control, 16 wells received KRB buffer containing 20 mM glucose and 10 μM PMA, which is known to induce insulin secretion in both Bmal1-/- mouse islets and Beta-TC-6 cells (Perelis et al., 2015). After 1 hr, the supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 500 × g for 30 min. The supernatant was transferred into a fresh 384-well assay plate containing NanoGlo Luciferase Assay Substrate (Promega, Madison, WI), and luciferase intensity was measured by EnSpire Plate Reader (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) within 30 min. All liquids for the high-throughput screen were dispensed using Tecan Fluent Automated Liquid Handling Platform (Tecan, Mannedorf, Switzerland) at the High-Throughput Analysis Laboratory at Northwestern University. Screen feasibility was determined by calculating Z'-factor using the following formula: Z'-factor = 1–3(σp + σn)/(μp - μn) (where σp is the standard deviation of positive control [20 mM glucose + PMA], σn is the standard deviation of negative control [20 mM glucose only], μp is the mean intensity of positive control, and μn is the mean intensity of the negative control) (Zhang et al., 1999).

Determination of hit compounds

Request a detailed protocol

Z-scores are a measure of how many standard deviations above or below the population mean a raw score is. Z-scores for luciferase intensities produced by screened compounds were calculated from the following formula: z = (X – μ)/σ (where z is the Z-score, X is the luciferase intensity of the compounds, μ is the intensity of negative control [20 mM glucose], and σ is the standard deviation of negative control). A row-based correction factor was applied to all luciferase readings to adjust for logarithmic signal decay. Hit compounds were defined as those that elicited a response of greater than 3 standard deviations from the mean (Z-score > 3) and more than 1.25-fold increase compared to negative control, which is the cutoff for ~10% chance of the observation occurring by random chance. Validated hit compounds that augmented insulin secretion at low drug dose were considered lead compounds.

Insulin secretion assays in pancreatic islets, pseudoislets, and cell lines

Request a detailed protocol

Mouse pancreatic islets were isolated via bile duct collagenase digestion (Collagenase P, Sigma) and Biocoll (Millipore) gradient separation and left to recover overnight at 37°C in RPMI 1640 with 10% FBS, 1% L-glutamine, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. For insulin release assays, duplicates of five equally sized islets per mouse were statically incubated in Krebs-Ringer Buffer (KRB) at 2 mM glucose for 1 hr and then stimulated for 1 hr at 37°C with 2 mM or 20 mM glucose in the presence or absence of 10 μM of each compound. Supernatant was collected and assayed for insulin content by ELISA (Crystal Chem Inc, Elk Grove Village, IL). Islets were then sonicated in acid-ethanol solution and solubilized overnight at 4°C before assaying total insulin content by ELISA. For insulin release assays from pseudoislets, 3 × 106 cells were plated for 3 days in 60 mm suspension dishes and allowed to form pseudoislets for 2–3 days. Glucose-responsive insulin secretion was performed as described above using 10 pseudoislets per sample and a basal glucose level of 0 mM glucose instead of 2 mM (Marcheva et al., 2020). For secretion from insulin-NanoLuc cell lines, 1 × 105 cells were cultured on poly-L-lysine-coated 96 well plates for 2–3 days, starved for 1 hr in 0 mM glucose KRB, then stimulated with indicated compounds and/or receptor antagonists for 1 hr in conjunction with 0 mM basal glucose or 20 mM stimulatory glucose conditions. Luciferase intensity after addition of NanoGlo to supernatant was measured by Cytation3 Plate Reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT).

Perifusion of primary islets and pseudoislets

Request a detailed protocol

Primary islets from PdxCre;Bmal1flx/flx and Bmal1flx/flx mice were isolated as described above and left to recover overnight. Perifusion of 100 islets per mouse per treatment was performed using a Biorep Technologies Perifusion System Model PERI-4.2 with a rate of 100 μl/min KRB (0.1% BSA). After 1 hr of preincubation and equilibration at a rate of 100 μl/min with 2 mM glucose KRB, islets were perifused for 10 min with 2 mM glucose KRB, followed by perifusion for 30 min with 20 mM glucose or 20 mM glucose plus IVM. Perifusate was collected in 96-well plates, and insulin secreted was analyzed via ELISA. Perifusion of insulin-NanoLuc pseudoislets was performed in an identical manner using 0 mM glucose KRB instead of 2 mM glucose KRB. Pseudoislet perifusate was analyzed for NanoLuc activity using NanoGlo Luciferase Assay Substrate (Promega) as per the manual instructions.

In vivo ivermectin treatment and glucose measurements

Request a detailed protocol

Mice were injected intraperitoneally for 14 days with 1.3 mg/kg body weight of IVM, which was dissolved in 40% w/v 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (Sigma-Aldrich) (Jin et al., 2013). At the end of IVM treatment, mice were fasted for 14 hr and glucose tolerance tests were performed at ZT2 following intraperitoneal glucose injection at 2 g/kg body weight. Plasma glucose levels were measured by enzymatic assay (Autokit Glucose, Wako-Fujifilm, Cincinnati, OH).

Synchronization, RNA isolation, and qPCR mRNA quantification

Request a detailed protocol

Where indicated, circadian synchronization was performed using 200 WT pseudoislets by first exposing cells to 10 μM forskolin for 1 hr, followed by transfer to normal media and RNA collection every 4 hr 24–44 hr following forskolin synchronization pulse. RNA was extracted from Beta-TC-6 cells and pseudoislets using Tri Reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc, Cincinnati, OH) and frozen at −80°C. RNA was purified according to the manufacturer’s protocol using the Direct-zol RNA Microprep kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA) with DNase digestion. cDNAs were then synthesized using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Amarillo, TX). Quantitative real-time PCR analysis was performed with SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and analyzed using a Touch CFX384 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Target gene expression levels were normalized to β-actin and set relative to control conditions using the comparative CT method. Primer sequences for qPCR are as follows: β-actin forward: 5'-TGCTCTGGCTCCTAGCACCATGAAGATCAA-3', reverse: 5'-AAACGCAGCTCAGTAACAGTCCGCCTAGAA-3'; P2ry1 forward: 5'- TTATGTCAGCGTGCTGGTGT-3', reverse: 5'-ACGTGGTGTCATAGCAGGTG-3'.

RNA-sequencing and analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Following RNA isolation (described above), RNA quality was assessed using a Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA), and sequencing libraries were constructed using a NEBNext Ultra Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, E7420L) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Libraries were quantified using a NEBNext Library Quant Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs, E7630L) and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500 instrument using 42 bp paired-end reads. For differential expression analysis, RNA raw sequence reads were aligned to the reference genome (mm10) using STAR version 2.7.2b, and raw and transcripts per million (TPM) count values determined using RSEM version 1.3.3. Differentially expressed RNAs were identified by a false discovery rate (FDR)-adjusted p-value<0.05 and a fold change > 1.5 using DESeq2 version 1.32.0 in R 4.1.0. Heatmaps were generated using the pheatmap package in R. Raw mRNA sequencing data and gene abundance measurements have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession GSE186469.

Intracellular calcium determination

Request a detailed protocol

Beta-TC-6 cells were plated at a density of 100,000 cells per well in black 96-well plates with clear bottoms and cultured overnight at 37°C and 5% CO2. Cells were then washed with BSA-free KRB buffer with no glucose and loaded with 5 μM Fura-2 (Invitrogen, Amarillo, TX) and 0.04% Pluronic F-127 (Invitrogen) for 30 min at 37°C. Following a wash with BSA-free KRB, Fura-2 intensity was measured after stimulation with either glucose alone or glucose plus the indicated compounds. Cells were alternately excited with 340 nm and 380 nm wavelength light, and the emitted light was detected at 510 nm using a Cytation 3 Cell Imaging Multi-Mode Reader (BioTek) at sequential 30 s intervals. Raw fluorescence data were exported to Microsoft Excel and expressed as the 340/380 ratio for each well.

Human islet studies and ethics statement

Request a detailed protocol

Human islet isolations and human islet cell biology experiments approved by the University of Alberta Human Research Ethics Board (approval identifiers: Pro00013094; Pro00001754) were performed at the Alberta Diabetes Institute Islet-Core according to the methods deposited in the protocols.io repository (Isolation of Human Pancreatic Islets of Langerhans for Research V.3, 2021). Organ donation was coordinated by the appropriate regional organ procurement organization, including obtaining written next-of-kin consent for use of donor organs in this study. Donor organs were deidentified by the organ procurement organization prior to shipment to the Alberta Diabetes Institute Islet-Core, and no identifying donor information was made available to the research team. A total of three nondiabetic (ND) donors were examined in this study. Full details of donor information, organ processing, and quality control information can be assessed with donor number (donors R224, R225, and R226 in this study) at https://www.isletcore.ca.

Patch-clamp electrophysiology in human and mouse islets

Request a detailed protocol

Patch-clamp measurement of exocytic responses in mouse β-cells was performed as previously described (Marcheva et al., 2020). Dispersed human islets were cultured in low glucose (5.5 mM) DMEM media (supplemented with L-glutamine, 110 mg/l sodium pyruvate, 10% FBS, and 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin) in 35 mm culture dishes overnight. On the day of patch-clamp measurements, human or mouse islet cells were preincubated in extracellular solution at 1 mM glucose for 1 hr and capacitance was measured at 10 mM glucose with DMSO or 10 µM IVM as previously described (Marcheva et al., 2020). Mouse β-cells were identified by cell size and by half-maximal inactivation of Na+ currents near –90 mV, and human β-cells were identified by immunostaining for positive insulin, following the experiment as described (Fu et al., 2019). Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (v8.0c). Comparison of multiple groups was done by one- or two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni or Tukey’s post test. Data are expressed as means ± SEM, where p<0.05 is considered significant.

Single-cell RNA-seq analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Sequencing data from the study under SRA accession ERP017126 (Segerstolpe et al., 2016) were downloaded and converted to fastq files using the commands ‘prefetch’ followed by ‘fastq-dump’ through the sra-toolkit (v2.10.5). Each individual cell was aligned and transcript abundance quantified using RSEM with Hg38 (GRCh38.p12) as a reference. Raw single-cell expression count values were imported into RStudio for analysis using Seurat (Hao et al., 2021). Following low-quality cell removal, normalized expression values were used in uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) dimensional reduction analyses to cluster distinct cell types. The R script, raw count tables, and parameters of these analyses are made publicly available under the Gene Expression Omnibus accession GSE186469.

Western blotting

Request a detailed protocol

Beta-TC-6 cells lysates were isolated by treating cell pellets with RIPA buffer (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 1× protease and 1× phosphatase inhibitors (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Protein levels were quantified using Quick Start Bradford Protein Assay, and protein extracts were subject to SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad). Primary antibodies used were anti-P2Y1 (Santa Cruz, sc-377324) and anti-β-actin (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, CST 4970).

Statistical analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Results were expressed as mean ± SEM unless otherwise noted. Information on sample size, genotype, and p values is provided within each figure and figure legend. Statistical significance of capacitance, Fura2, and perifusion data was performed using a two-way ANOVA or mixed effects model (for datasets with missing values) with repeated measures followed by multiple comparison tests using a Bonferroni p-value adjustment via Prism (v9.2.0). Statistical analysis was performed by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test unless otherwise indicated. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. JTK_Cycle (v3) was used to determine rhythmicity in qPCR data using a period length of 24 hr and considering a Benjamini–Hochberg (BH)-adjusted p-value<0.05 as statistically rhythmic (Hughes et al., 2010).

Data availability

Data in this study is publicly available in the GEO repository GSE186469. Source data files have been provided for the compounds used in the screen (Table S1), RNA-seq results (Table S2), and gel images (Source Data 1-2).

The following data sets were generated
    1. Weidemann BJ
    (2021) NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus
    ID GSE186469. High-throughput screen reveals purinergic receptor as a therapeutic target in circadian β-cell failure.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE186469
The following previously published data sets were used
    1. Perelis M
    2. Marcheva B
    3. Barish GD
    4. Bass J
    (2015) NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus
    ID GSE69889. Genome-wide Circadian Control of Transcription at Active Enhancers Regulates Insulin Secretion and Diabetes Risk.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE69889
    1. Perelis M
    (2020) NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus
    ID GSE146916. A role for alternative splicing in circadian control of insulin secretion and glucose homeostasis.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE146916
    1. Palasantza A
    2. Sandberg R
    3. Segerstolpe A
    (2016) ArrayExpress
    ID E-MTAB-5061. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis of human pancreas from healthy individuals and type 2 diabetes patients.
    https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-MTAB-5061/

References

    1. Dawson GR
    2. Wafford KA
    3. Smith A
    4. Marshall GR
    5. Bayley PJ
    6. Schaeffer JM
    7. Meinke PT
    8. McKernan RM
    (2000)
    Anticonvulsant and adverse effects of avermectin analogs in mice are mediated through the gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) receptor
    The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 295:1051–1060.
    1. Galisteo M
    2. Rissel M
    3. Sergent O
    4. Chevanne M
    5. Cillard J
    6. Guillouzo A
    7. Lagadic-Gossmann D
    (2000)
    Hepatotoxicity of tacrine: occurrence of membrane fluidity alterations without involvement of lipid peroxidation
    The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 294:160–167.
    1. Karlsson S
    2. Ahrén B
    (1992)
    Effects of tacrine on insulin secretion and 86Rb+ and 45Ca++ efflux from rat pancreatic islets
    The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 263:494–498.
    1. Khakh BS
    2. Proctor WR
    3. Dunwiddie TV
    4. Labarca C
    5. Lester HA
    (1999)
    Allosteric control of gating and kinetics at P2X(4) receptor channels
    The Journal of Neuroscience 19:7289–7299.
    1. Lang C
    2. Staiger C
    (2016)
    Tyrothricin--An underrated agent for the treatment of bacterial skin infections and superficial wounds?
    Die Pharmazie 71:299–305.
    1. Roghani S
    2. Duperon DF
    3. Barcohana N
    (1999)
    Evaluating the efficacy of commonly used topical anesthetics
    Pediatric Dentistry 21:197–200.

Decision letter

  1. Achim Kramer
    Reviewing Editor; Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Germany
  2. Didier YR Stainier
    Senior Editor; Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Germany
  3. Charna Dibner
    Reviewer; University of Geneva, Switzerland

Our editorial process produces two outputs: i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Pharmacologic rescue of circadian β-cell failure through P2Y1 purinergic receptor identified by small-molecule screen" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 2 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Didier Stainier as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Charna Dibner (Reviewer #1).

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions:

1) Analyze the specificity of ivermectin for modulating insulin secretion regarding Bmal1-KO and β-cells, respectively. Test ivermectin on other endocrine cell types and other models for clock disruption.

2) Perform control experiments as requested by reviewer #2, major point 4, in particular those for experiments described in Figure 3 and Figure 4.

3) Discuss novelty compared to Burns et al., 2015.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a prevalent metabolic disease that is phenotypically characterized by the loss of ß cell secretory function and cell mass. Its pathophysiology is complex and includes a combination of genetic and environmental risk factors. Studies in humans suggest that circadian misalignment (e.g. under shift work schedules) and disrupted sleep are associated with an increased incidence of T2D, as well as signs of ß cell failure and insulin insensitivity. In addition, mouse studies have confirmed that deletions of key components of the molecular clock disrupt normal glucose homeostasis, ß cell function, and insulin secretion. Global Bmal1 KO and pancreatic Bmal1 KO have been shown to negatively impact glucose tolerance, glucose stimulated insulin secretion, and pancreatic islet size. However, despite a relatively clear connection between circadian disruption and risk for development of T2D, molecular mechanisms are yet to be described in detail and hold potential for contributing to the development of novel therapeutic and preventative strategies.

The authors aim to tackle these questions by identifying pharmacological compounds that improve the phenotype of circadian ß cell failure, as well as by further describing the mode of action of their final target compound.

1) Do the authors believe that the pharmacological compound hit they identify in their screen is specific for Bmal1 KO induced ß cell failure or is the disruption of circadian rhythmicity more important than knock-out of this specific gene? Since they have the insulin-nanoluciferase reporter and the compound library they could perform a smaller sub-screen with selected candidates in a model of circadian ß cell failure that is different from Bmal1 KO.

2) My impression was that the authors are interested in finding pharmacological compounds that can rescue circadian ß cell failure. However, many of their results show that ivermectin also enhances insulin secretion in wild type cells/islets. So what is the conclusion of the authors? Did they just find "another drug for treatment of ß cell failure" or is it really specific for ß cell failure originating from circadian disruption (or perhaps Bmal1 KO)? If the former is the case, what would be the benefit of performing a compound screen in Bmal1 KO ß cells rather then in other established models of ß cell failure or wild type ß cells?

Specifically, I am referring to Figures Figure 3: Here the authors show that ivermectin treatment enhances glucose dependent insulin secretion, calcium influx, and membrane capacitance also in wild type islets. Why did they not test the effect of ivermectin on calcium influx and on insulin secretion in the perifusion system using their Bmal1 mutant islets?

Generally the effect of ivermectin in wild type cells/islets appears somewhat inconsistent. For example, it does not enhance membrane capacitance in wild type mouse islets but it does enhance it in human islets. In Figure 3D glucose + ivermectin treatment completely rescues insulin release in Bmal1 mutant islets (release is similar to wild type levels) but in Figure 4D it does not. Can the authors discuss this?

3) In their study from 2015, Burns et al., (Cell Metabolism, reference 76.) developed a insulin-gaussia luciferase reporter that to my understanding is identical to the insulin-nanoluciferase reporter except for exchange of the luciferase enzyme. Burns et al., also used their reporter system to screen for modifiers of insulin secretion in a high-throughput format. Could the authors please elaborate why they chose to replace gaussia by nanoluciferase and what is novel/beneficial about their approach?

4) Some important experimental controls are missing in some of the experiments (as follows). Also it is unclear why for some experiments the authors used 2mM "basal glucose" as control condition and sometimes they used 0mM glucose. Could they please explain?

Figure 3B – why are Bmal1 KO islets not included?

Figure 3C – again, why no Bmal1 KO islets?

Figure 4B – why is there no control with no glucose and just MRS?

Figure 4C – again, why is there no control with just MRS?

Figure S2D – 0mM glucose + Isr is missing

Figure S2E – again control with just Isr is missing

Figure S3B – P2ry1 transcript is rhythmic in wild type ß cells but is it's rhythmicity really lost in Bmal1 KO ß cells? (if the authors claim that P2ry1 is regulated by BMAL1 they should check this)

5) Could the authors elaborate on their strategy to identify potential ivermectin targets? It appears that ivermectin also augments insulin secretion in wild type cells, so is it really logical to check for transcripts that are already highly expressed in wild type? Wouldn't it be more intuitive to look for the top differentially expressed genes in wild type vs. Bmal1 KO ß cells? Also I would like to point out that the display of the differential gene expression data (Figure S3A) is difficult to understand for the reader. Rather than plotting the p-value the authors could show the log-fold change of expression (or similar) so that the reader can comprehend Bmal1 KO induced changes.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75132.sa1

Author response

Essential revisions:

1) Analyze the specificity of ivermectin for modulating insulin secretion regarding Bmal1-KO and β-cells, respectively. Test ivermectin on other endocrine cell types and other models for clock disruption.

We thank the Reviewers for these helpful suggestions. In our revised manuscript, we include new data from clock-disrupted cryptochrome (Cry1-/-; Cry2-/-) knockout mice. We show that islets isolated from these mice display impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion yet remain responsive to ivermectin (IVM) (new Figure 3D), similar to our findings in pancreas-specific Bmal1-/- mice (Figure 3B). Inclusion of this new data suggests that the restoration of insulin secretion in Bmal1-/- cells by IVM is due to rescue of a defect caused by the circadian clock network as opposed to a non-circadian effect of deletion of a specific transcription factor.

p7. We have added the following text: “Additionally, we observed a similar 2.9-fold increase in GSIS following administration of IVM to islets isolated from an independent mouse model of circadian disruption (Cry1-/-; Cry2-/- mice) (Figure 3D), suggesting that IVM ameliorates secretory defects caused by disruption of the circadian clock network.”

We also appreciate the suggestion to assess the possible effect of IVM on other endocrine cell types within the islets. Since our screen was performed in an exclusively β-cell culture, it is unlikely that IVM effects on other endocrine cell types, particularly glucagon-secreting α cells, explain the insulinotropic effects of IVM in whole islets studies. While we cannot rule out effects of IVM on other cell types, we now provide data from our new single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis (SRA accession ERP017126) in human islets that shows that P2RY1 expression is enriched in insulin-producing β cells but not within glucagon-expressing α cells (new Figure 4—figure supplement 1C) (1). Therefore, we do not believe that IVM action through P2Y1 within α cells contributes to the enhanced insulin secretion observed in these islets.

p8. We have added the following text: “Finally, analysis of RNA-sequencing data from human islets (SRA accession ERP017126) indicates that P2RY1 expression is enriched within β cells among hormone-secreting cell types, with little to no detectable expression in the glucagon-secreting α cells (Figure 4—figure supplement 1C).”

2) Perform control experiments as requested by reviewer #2, major point 4, in particular those for experiments described in Figure 3 and Figure 4.

In our revised manuscript, we now include the controls requested by Reviewer 2 in Major Comment 4.

(i) A prior critique was the lack of a dynamic assessment of insulin secretion in IVM-treated Bmal1-/- islets. In response, we have now performed dynamic perifusion experiments, where we measure insulin every 2 min over the course of 30 min following stimulation with either 20 mM glucose or 20 mM glucose plus 10 µM IVM. While Bmal1-/- islets exhibit reduced glucose-stimulated insulin release, IVM enhances Bmal1-/- islet insulin secretion to the same level observed in islets from control mice not exposed to drug during both the initial burst of insulin secretion (first 12 min) and the sustained release (12 – 30 min). These results provide new dynamic evidence for IVM-augmentation of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in the setting of molecular clock disruption (new Figure 3C).

p7. We have added the following text: “Furthermore, perifusion experiments in islets from Bmal1 mutant mice revealed that IVM significantly increased insulin release during both the initial burst of secretion (first 12 minutes post-stimulation) and during the sustained release (12-30 min) in both WT and Bmal1 mutant islets (Figure 3C).”

(ii) We present new control data demonstrating that the P2Y1 inhibitor MRS2179 (MRS) has no effect on insulin secretion or calcium influx in the absence of glucose (new Figure 4B-C).

(iii) We also show new control data demonstrating that the calcium channel inhibitor isradipine (Isr) decreases insulin secretion and calcium influx regardless of the presence of glucose or IVM, suggesting IVM acts upstream of calcium channel signaling (new Figure 3—figure supplement 1C-D).

(iv) Finally, we also present new requested data demonstrating that P2ry1 levels remain reduced across the 24-hr day, and that rhythmic expression is lost in synchronized Bmal1-/- pseudoislets (new Figure 4—figure supplement 1B). This new data, in combination with our previous genomics evidence for enrichment of BMAL1 binding sites within the P2ry1 enhancer region (Figure 4A, Figure 4—figure supplement 1A), support a direct role for BMAL1 in regulation of P2ry1.

p8. We have added the following text: “We also found decreased levels and loss in rhythmicity of P2ry1 in synchronized Bmal1-/- pseudoislets (Figure 4—figure supplement 1B). BMAL1 chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing in Β-TC-6 cells also revealed enrichment of BMAL1 chromatin binding within enhancer regions 266 – 41 kb upstream of the P2ry1 gene transcription start site (GSE69889) (Figure 4A, Figure 4—figure supplement 1A).”

3) Discuss novelty compared to Burns et al., 2015.

We thank the reviewers for the opportunity to expand upon the novelty of our screen in reference to previous publications, including that of Burns et al., 2015 (2). We designed our screen to identify small molecules and pharmacologic targets that can augment glucose-coupled insulin secretion in the context of impaired β cell function following abrogation of the molecular clock. In contrast, Burns et al., sought to identify compounds that activate or repress glucose-coupled insulin secretion in two strains of wild-type β cells in the absence of disease. Since molecular pathways that drive insulin secretion are perturbed during disease (3-5), we sought to identify compounds and pathways that effectively augment insulin secretion despite alterations in molecular pathways present in the diseased state. While this does not exclude compounds that effectively enhance insulin secretion in the “healthy” cell, we reasoned that our phenotype-driven approach would increase the sensitivity to identify targets with high predictive validity. Therefore, our concept was to leverage circadian mutant β cells as a rare (monogenic) form of diabetes, with the goal of uncovering insulinotropic mechanisms downstream of the molecular clock and at the same time finding targets that may have broad applicability as anti-hyperglycemic agents. We believe that our effort was fruitful insofar as our studies have shown insulinotropic effects of IVM in three independent models of β-cell failure, including in Bmal1 KO, Cry double KO, and Akita diabetic mice (Figure 3B-D, Figure 3—figure supplement 1F-G).

To directly compare the results of our study with those found in Burns et al., we tabulated Z-scores of similarly annotated compounds side-by-side between our screen and those performed in INS1E and MIN6 cells in Burns et al., 2015 (Author response image 1). Of note, two lead compounds (ivermectin and tyrothricin) in Burns et al., had a positive Z-score in both INS1E and MIN6 cells, consistent with findings from our study (Figure 2B-D). In contrast, suloctidil was found to be insulinotropic in our screen but insulin-repressive in the Burns study. Further, while the compounds bufexamac, doramectin, moxidectin, and lobendazole were efficacious in promoting insulin secretion in wild-type MIN6 cells, these were found to be either ineffective (Z-score < 1) or inhibitory for insulin secretion in BMAL1-ablated cells, which suggests these compounds may be ineffective in treating diabetes with a circadian component. Finally, potent inhibitors of insulin secretion in both screens included the calcium channel blockers isradipine and nitrendipine, consistent with a role for ca2+ influx in β-cell physiology (6, 7). Together, these results highlight the importance of studying compounds in a context where the assay model (circadian disruption) reflects the relevant disease (type 2 diabetes).

Author response image 1
Download asset Open asset
Comparison of our circadian small molecule screen to Burns et al.

, 2015 screen. The hits from each screen were compared by analyzing Z-scores, which reflect the compounds’ insulin-secretory effects on Bmal1-/- Β-TC-6 cells (our screen) versus the cell-types used by Burns et al., wild-type MIN6 (left) and INS1E cells (right), in the presence of glucose.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a prevalent metabolic disease that is phenotypically characterized by the loss of ß cell secretory function and cell mass. Its pathophysiology is complex and includes a combination of genetic and environmental risk factors. Studies in humans suggest that circadian misalignment (e.g. under shift work schedules) and disrupted sleep are associated with an increased incidence of T2D, as well as signs of ß cell failure and insulin insensitivity. In addition, mouse studies have confirmed that deletions of key components of the molecular clock disrupt normal glucose homeostasis, ß cell function, and insulin secretion. Global Bmal1 KO and pancreatic Bmal1 KO have been shown to negatively impact glucose tolerance, glucose stimulated insulin secretion, and pancreatic islet size. However, despite a relatively clear connection between circadian disruption and risk for development of T2D, molecular mechanisms are yet to be described in detail and hold potential for contributing to the development of novel therapeutic and preventative strategies.

The authors aim to tackle these questions by identifying pharmacological compounds that improve the phenotype of circadian ß cell failure, as well as by further describing the mode of action of their final target compound.

1) Do the authors believe that the pharmacological compound hit they identify in their screen is specific for Bmal1 KO induced ß cell failure or is the disruption of circadian rhythmicity more important than knock-out of this specific gene? Since they have the insulin-nanoluciferase reporter and the compound library they could perform a smaller sub-screen with selected candidates in a model of circadian ß cell failure that is different from Bmal1 KO.

The Reviewer raises the important question about whether IVM-enhanced GSIS in the Bmal1-/- β cells is specific to loss of the BMAL1 transcription factor itself, or whether IVM rescues GSIS in other models of clock network disruption. As described above in the response to Essential Revisions Point #1, we provide new data demonstrating that IVM also enhances GSIS in an independent model of circadian disruption (Cry1-/-; Cry2-/-) (new Figure 3D in response to Essential Revisions Point #1), in addition to Bmal1-/- cells. Inclusion of this new data suggests that the restoration of insulin secretion in the Bmal1-/- cells by IVM is due to rescue of a defect caused by the circadian clock network itself as opposed a non-circadian effect of deletion of a specific transcription factor. We have added this new data to the manuscript as described above in the response to Essential Revisions Point #1.

2) My impression was that the authors are interested in finding pharmacological compounds that can rescue circadian ß cell failure. However, many of their results show that ivermectin also enhances insulin secretion in wild type cells/islets. So what is the conclusion of the authors? Did they just find "another drug for treatment of ß cell failure" or is it really specific for ß cell failure originating from circadian disruption (or perhaps Bmal1 KO)? If the former is the case, what would be the benefit of performing a compound screen in Bmal1 KO ß cells rather then in other established models of ß cell failure or wild type ß cells?

The Reviewer raises an interesting point regarding our finding that IVM enhances insulin secretion in the setting of both circadian disruption and in wild-type β cells. In our revised manuscript, we clarify that we specifically designed our screen to identify small molecules and pharmacologic targets that can augment glucose-coupled insulin secretion in the context of impaired β cell function following abrogation of the molecular clock. We chose this phenotype-driven approach to identify compounds and pathways that effectively augment insulin secretion despite alterations in molecular pathways present in the diseased state, with the goal of uncovering insulinotropic mechanisms downstream of the molecular clock and at the same time finding targets that may have broad applicability as anti-hyperglycemic agents.

We note that this does not exclude identification of compounds that effectively enhance insulin secretion in the “healthy” cell (as the Reviewer noted). The finding that IVM enhances glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in wild-type islets in addition to Bmal1 KOs does not diminish the novel observation that IVM is able to augment insulin secretion during clock disruption. We identified pharmacologic activation of the P2Y1 receptor as a potential therapeutic avenue by using a genetic-sensitized screen, combined with genomics analyses in the Bmal1 KO islets. Since the phenotype of the circadian mutant β cells used in this screen overlaps with features of β-cell failure found in T2D, we expect the hits from this screen to be more predictive of therapeutic effect in diabetes relative to those identified in healthy β cells. Supporting this hypothesis, we found IVM to be efficacious in enhancing glucose-responsive insulin secretion in multiple models of insulin secretion defects, including circadian-disrupted Cry double KOs and Akita islets. Future studies on the transcriptional networks shared between these models and how BMAL1::CLOCK/NPAS2 regulate physiological activity of purinergic receptors are warranted.

An additional perspective as to the utility of the genetically-sensitized circadian mutant screen is that many insulinotropic factors in WT cells, such as those directly inducing depolarization via closure of the potassium sulfonylurea channel, would not stimulate insulin secretion in the setting of circadian mutant cells (12)—in essence the approach we’ve taken of using mutant cells as a first level of screening provides a “filter” to enhance detection of “hit” compounds that might work in mutant cells and likewise reveal mechanistic insight into the circadian basis for β-cell function. We speculate that phenotype-driven screens similar to our present study can in the future expand using cell-based assays as a starting point to identify insulinotropic compounds and mechanisms involved in rare genetic (i.e. MODY mutations) and even more common environmental (i.e. lipoglucotoxicity models) conditions.

Specifically, I am referring to Figures Figure 3: Here the authors show that ivermectin treatment enhances glucose dependent insulin secretion, calcium influx, and membrane capacitance also in wild type islets. Why did they not test the effect of ivermectin on calcium influx and on insulin secretion in the perifusion system using their Bmal1 mutant islets?

We now provide new data demonstrating a decrease in glucose-stimulated insulin release during dynamic perifusion experiments in Bmal1-/- islets that is restored in the presence of IVM, supporting a role for IVM-augmentation of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in a model of clock disruption (see detailed response to Essential Revisions Point #1, new Figure 3C).

Generally the effect of ivermectin in wild type cells/islets appears somewhat inconsistent. For example, it does not enhance membrane capacitance in wild type mouse islets but it does enhance it in human islets. In Figure 3D glucose + ivermectin treatment completely rescues insulin release in Bmal1 mutant islets (release is similar to wild type levels) but in Figure 4D it does not. Can the authors discuss this?

Our insulin secretion and calcium influx experiments consistently show that IVM increases secretion and calcium flux in WT mouse cells and islets, as well as in islets from control mice in our Bmal1 and Cry mutant experiments (Figures 2D, 3A-D 4B-D, Figure 3—figure supplement 1A-C). IVM treatment also enhances membrane capacitance in human islets (Figure 3F) though as the Reviewer noted, IVM did not result in a significant increase in membrane capacitance in control mouse islets (Figure 3E), which could be a result of either a small sample size (n=4 experiments with IVM in controls) or alternatively that capacitance under these conditions is already maximally stimulated in control islets, thereby preventing a further increase in capacitance following IVM stimulation.

We further note that our experiments also consistently show that IVM increases insulin release and calcium flux in circadian mutant cells and islets (Figures 3B-E, 4D), suggesting IVM can consistently rescue impaired secretory capacity in circadian mutants to physiological/wild-type levels, though the Reviewer notes there are differences in the degree of stimulation in the islets from Bmal1 mutant mice in Figures 3B,D vs the pseudoislets from Bmal1 mutant Β-TC-6 cells in Figure 4D, for example. Given our evidence that IVM augments P2Y1 signaling, it is possible that islet cell-to-cell paracrine nucleosides (13) may be required for full IVM effect. Therefore, the differences in degree of stimulation in islets versus pseudoislets may represent a difference in β-cell versus mixed-islet-cell response to IVM. Future studies will seek to understand IVM effects on islet cell crosstalk and other islet hormones.

3) In their study from 2015, Burns et al., (Cell Metabolism, reference 76.) developed a insulin-gaussia luciferase reporter that to my understanding is identical to the insulin-nanoluciferase reporter except for exchange of the luciferase enzyme. Burns et al., also used their reporter system to screen for modifiers of insulin secretion in a high-throughput format. Could the authors please elaborate why they chose to replace aussian by nanoluciferase and what is novel/beneficial about their approach?

We thank the Reviewer for the opportunity to clarify the novelty of our approach compared to a previously published small molecule screens for insulinotropic compounds (Burns et al., 2015) (2). We first wish to clarify that we used a Proinsulin-NanoLuc lentiviral vector (Proinsulin-NanoLuc in pLX304) that was a gift from David Altshuler, senior author of the Burns et al., paper (Addgene plasmid #62057; http://n2t.net/addgene:62057). The plasmid we received contains a Nano-luciferase insert as opposed to the Gaussia luciferase insert reported in Burns et al., 2015. For this reason, we independently validated our screen against an insulin immunoassay (Figure 1C). We note that Nanoluciferase is a slightly smaller construct (19 kDa) than the Gaussian luciferase (20 kDa), but both emit light in response to the compound substrate (i.e. Nano-Glo Substrate, Promega) in an ATP-independent manner.

Regarding novelty of our approach, as described above in the Essential Revisions Point #3, we designed our screen to identify small molecules and pharmacologic targets that can augment glucose-coupled insulin secretion in the context of impaired β cell function following abrogation of the molecular clock. Burns et al., on the other hand, sought to identify compounds that either activate or repress glucose-coupled insulin secretion in two strains of wild-type β cells in the absence of disease. Thus, we sought to identify compounds and pathways that effectively augment insulin secretion despite alterations in molecular pathways present in the diseased state. While this does not exclude compounds that effectively enhance insulin secretion in the “healthy” cell, we reasoned that our phenotype-driven approach would increase the sensitivity to identify targets with high predictive validity. Therefore, our concept was to leverage circadian mutant β cells as a rare (monogenic) form of diabetes, with the goal of uncovering insulinotropic mechanisms downstream of the molecular clock and at the same time finding targets that may have broad applicability as anti-hyperglycemic agents. We believe that our effort was fruitful insofar, as our studies showed insulinotropic effects of IVM in three independent models of β-cell failure, including Bmal1 KO and Cry double KO mice as well as in the setting of the Akita diabetic mouse (Figure 3B-D, Figure 3—figure supplement 1F-G).

Finally, to compare the results of our study with those found in Burns et al., we tabulated Z-scores of similarly annotated compounds side-by-side between our screen and the screens performed using INS1E and MIN6 cells in Burns et al., 2015 (see Author response image 1). Of note, two lead compounds (ivermectin and tyrothricin) in Burns et al., had a positive Z-score in both INS1E and MIN6 cells, consistent with findings from our study. In contrast, suloctidil was found to be insulinotropic in our screen but insulin-repressive in the Burns study. Further, while the compounds bufexamac, doramectin, moxidectin, and lobendazole were efficacious in promoting insulin secretion in wild-type MIN6 cells, these were found to be either ineffective (Z-Score < 1) or inhibitory for insulin secretion in BMAL1-ablated cells, which suggests these compounds may be ineffective in treating diabetes with a circadian component. Finally, potent inhibitors of insulin secretion in both screens included the calcium channel blockers isradipine and nitrendipine, consistent with a role for ca2+ influx in β-cell physiology (6, 7). Together, these results highlight the importance of studying compounds in a context where the assay model (circadian disruption) reflects the relevant the disease (type 2 diabetes).

4) Some important experimental controls are missing in some of the experiments (as follows).

We now include the below-mentioned controls in our revised manuscript:

Figure 3B – why are Bmal1 KO islets not included?

Figure 3C – again, why no Bmal1 KO islets?

We now show new data demonstrating a decrease in glucose-stimulated insulin release during dynamic perifusion experiments in Bmal1 KO pseudoislets that is restored in the presence of IVM, supporting a role for IVM-augmentation of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in a model of clock disruption (see detailed response to Essential Revisions Point #2 and new Figure 3C). We found that BMAL1-deficient β cells fail to appropriately respond to glucose in the context of the calcium influx assay performed in the original Figure 3B, which utilizes a nutrient deplete media; thus continued work to optimize and identify different key factors influencing wild-type versus circadian mutant performance in the context of calcium influx will be the subject of future studies.

Figure 4B – why is there no control with no glucose and just MRS?

Figure 4C – again, why is there no control with just MRS?

We now present new data demonstrating the P2Y1 inhibitor MRS has no effect on insulin secretion or calcium influx in the absence of glucose (see detailed response to Essential Revisions Point #2 and new Figures 4B-C)

Figure S2D – 0mM glucose + Isr is missing

Figure S2E – again control with just Isr is missing

We now include the requested 0 mM glucose + Isr control and reveal decreases in insulin secretion and calcium influx following calcium channel inhibition with Isr in the absence of glucose (see detailed response to Essential Revisions Point #2 and new Figure 3—figure supplement 1C-D)

Figure S3B – P2ry1 transcript is rhythmic in wild type ß cells but is it's rhythmicity really lost in Bmal1 KO ß cells? (if the authors claim that P2ry1 is regulated by BMAL1 they should check this)

We now present new data demonstrating that P2ry1 levels remain reduced and arhythmic across the 24-hr day in synchronized Bmal1-/- pseudoislets (see detailed response to Essential Revisions Point #2 and new Figure 4—figure supplement 1B), supporting a direct role for BMAL1 in regulation of P2ry1.

Also it is unclear why for some experiments the authors used 2mM "basal glucose" as control condition and sometimes they used 0mM glucose. Could they please explain?

We have clarified in the methods that for the GSIS assays performed in primary islets, we used 2 mM glucose as the basal glucose concentration, which is standard in the field (14). We further clarified that 0 mM glucose was used as the basal glucose concentration for all GSIS assays performed in either β cell lines or pseudoislets in order to minimize the typically higher levels of unstimulated glucose-stimulated insulin secretion that occurs in β cell lines compared to islets (5).

5) Could the authors elaborate on their strategy to identify potential ivermectin targets? It appears that ivermectin also augments insulin secretion in wild type cells, so is it really logical to check for transcripts that are already highly expressed in wild type? Wouldn't it be more intuitive to look for the top differentially expressed genes in wild type vs. Bmal1 KO ß cells? Also I would like to point out that the display of the differential gene expression data (Figure S3A) is difficult to understand for the reader. Rather than plotting the p-value the authors could show the log-fold change of expression (or similar) so that the reader can comprehend Bmal1 KO induced changes.

Strategy to identify potential IVM targets: To identify potential IVM targets, we first performed a literature review to identify previously-published IVM targets to use as starting points, which included ion channels, G-protein coupled receptors, ionotropic receptors (such as purinergic, GABAergic, and glycine receptors), as well as farnesoid X nuclear receptors (15, 16). Our observations that IVM rapidly increases calcium flux and insulin release in a glucose-dependent manner argues against a role for a transcriptional regulator (FXR) or a direct ionophore effect (GABA) and is more consistent with a role for β-cell G-protein coupled receptor activation, which requires glucose for appropriate signaling (17, 18). Recently, P2Y1 was implicated in nutrient- and ATP/ADP-dependent regulation of insulin release through an adipocyte-islet axis, further suggesting P2Y1 may play a role in physiologic regulation of islet hormone release (13). Additional studies will be required to determine whether IVM affects paracrine ATP/ADP release to affect P2Y1 or whether IVM directly binds purinergic receptors in the β cell.

Analysis of differentially-expressed genes in BKOs to provide insight to potential candidates: Next, in agreement with the Reviewer’s suggestion, we considered top differentially-expressed genes in the WT vs Bmal1-/- β cells from our RNA-seq analyses. To clarify these findings in the text, we re-organized our Results section and now begin with data showing that P2ry1 is one of the most differentially-expressed genes in the Bmal1-/- β cells, with a 3.1-fold reduction (Adj. P=10-55) in expression (Figure 4A). We have also updated Figure S3A as requested to include the log-fold change of P2ry1 in addition to the p-value (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A, Author response image 2). Further support for BMAL1 control of P2ry1 is enriched BMAL1 chromatin binding within enhancer regions 266-41 kb upstream of the P2ry1 gene transcription start site by ChIP-sequencing (Figure 4A, Figure 4—figure supplement 1A), rhythmic expression of P2ry1 in WT Β-TC-6 pseudoislets (Figure 4—figure supplement 1B), and new data showing loss of rhythmic P2ry1 expression in Bmal1-/- pseudoislets (new Figure 4—figure supplement 1B).

Author response image 2
Download asset Open asset
Robust differential expression of P2ry1 following BMAL1 ablation.

The P2ry1 transcript is one of the most abundant receptors in the broad class of putative IVM targets and was identified following BMAL1 ablation as one of the most consistently and highly repressed transcripts (Adj. P < 10-55).

Thus, since it is known that IVM augments purinergic signaling (19, 20), that the purinergic receptor P2Y1 is significantly reduced in Bmal1-/- β cells, and that BMAL1 specifically controls P2ry1 amongst the purinergic receptor family in the β cell (Figure 4A, Figure 4—figure supplement 1A-B), we sought to test the functional role of the P2Y1 receptor in the insulinotropic action of IVM. While we cannot rule out potential action of IVM on other targets, evidence from our pharmacologic and genetic P2ry1 ablation models suggest P2Y1 is a critical component of the IVM insulinotropic effect.

References

1. Segerstolpe A, Palasantza A, Eliasson P, Andersson EM, Andreasson AC, Sun X, Picelli S, Sabirsh A, Clausen M, Bjursell MK, Smith DM, Kasper M, Ammala C, Sandberg R. Single-Cell Transcriptome Profiling of Human Pancreatic Islets in Health and Type 2 Diabetes. Cell Metab. 2016;24(4):593-607. Epub 2016/09/27. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.020. PubMed PMID: 27667667; PMCID: PMC5069352.

2. Burns SM, Vetere A, Walpita D, Dancik V, Khodier C, Perez J, Clemons PA, Wagner BK, Altshuler D. High-throughput luminescent reporter of insulin secretion for discovering regulators of pancreatic Β-cell function. Cell Metab. 2015;21(1):126-37. Epub 2015/01/08. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.12.010. PubMed PMID: 25565210.

3. Perelis M, Marcheva B, Ramsey KM, Schipma MJ, Hutchison AL, Taguchi A, Peek CB, Hong H, Huang W, Omura C, Allred AL, Bradfield CA, Dinner AR, Barish GD, Bass J. Pancreatic β cell enhancers regulate rhythmic transcription of genes controlling insulin secretion. Science. 2015;350(6261):aac4250. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4250. PubMed PMID: 26542580; PMCID: 4669216.

4. Avrahami D, Wang YJ, Schug J, Feleke E, Gao L, Liu C, Consortium H, Naji A, Glaser B, Kaestner KH. Single-cell transcriptomics of human islet ontogeny defines the molecular basis of β-cell dedifferentiation in T2D. Mol Metab. 2020;42:101057. Epub 2020/08/03. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101057. PubMed PMID: 32739450; PMCID: PMC7471622.

5. Marcheva B, Perelis M, Weidemann BJ, Taguchi A, Lin H, Omura C, Kobayashi Y, Newman MV, Wyatt EJ, McNally EM, Fox JEM, Hong H, Shankar A, Wheeler EC, Ramsey KM, MacDonald PE, Yeo GW, Bass J. A role for alternative splicing in circadian control of exocytosis and glucose homeostasis. Genes Dev. 2020;34(15-16):1089-105. Epub 2020/07/04. doi: 10.1101/gad.338178.120. PubMed PMID: 32616519; PMCID: PMC7397853.

6. Schulla V, Renstrom E, Feil R, Feil S, Franklin I, Gjinovci A, Jing XJ, Laux D, Lundquist I, Magnuson MA, Obermuller S, Olofsson CS, Salehi A, Wendt A, Klugbauer N, Wollheim CB, Rorsman P, Hofmann F. Impaired insulin secretion and glucose tolerance in β cell-selective Ca(v)1.2 ca2+ channel null mice. EMBO J. 2003;22(15):3844-54. Epub 2003/07/26. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg389. PubMed PMID: 12881419; PMCID: PMC169062.

7. Vasseur M, Debuyser A, Joffre M. Sensitivity of pancreatic β cell to calcium channel blockers. An electrophysiologic study of verapamil and nifedipine. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 1987;1(2):95-113. Epub 1987/01/01. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.1987.tb00549.x. PubMed PMID: 3315915.

8. Bult CJ, Blake JA, Smith CL, Kadin JA, Richardson JE, Mouse Genome Database G. Mouse Genome Database (MGD) 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D801-D6. Epub 2018/11/09. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1056. PubMed PMID: 30407599; PMCID: PMC6323923.

9. Gorgani NN, Smith BA, Kono DH, Theofilopoulos AN. Histidine-rich glycoprotein binds to DNA and Fc γ RI and potentiates the ingestion of apoptotic cells by macrophages. J Immunol. 2002;169(9):4745-51. Epub 2002/10/23. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.9.4745. PubMed PMID: 12391183.

10. Nauck M, Stockmann F, Ebert R, Creutzfeldt W. Reduced incretin effect in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes. Diabetologia. 1986;29(1):46-52. Epub 1986/01/01. doi: 10.1007/BF02427280. PubMed PMID: 3514343.

11. Drucker DJ, Nauck MA. The incretin system: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2006;368(9548):1696-705. Epub 2006/11/14. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69705-5. PubMed PMID: 17098089.

12. Marcheva B, Ramsey KM, Buhr ED, Kobayashi Y, Su H, Ko CH, Ivanova G, Omura C, Mo S, Vitaterna MH, Lopez JP, Philipson LH, Bradfield CA, Crosby SD, Jebailey L, Wang X, Takahashi JS, Bass J. Disruption of the clock components CLOCK and BMAL1 leads to hypoinsulinaemia and diabetes. Nature. 2010;466(7306):571-2. Epub 2010/06/22. doi: nature09253 [pii]10.1038/nature09253. PubMed PMID: 20562852.

13. Prentice KJ, Saksi J, Robertson LT, Lee GY, Inouye KE, Eguchi K, Lee A, Cakici O, Otterbeck E, Cedillo P, Achenbach P, Ziegler AG, Calay ES, Engin F, Hotamisligil GS. A hormone complex of FABP4 and nucleoside kinases regulates islet function. Nature. 2021;600(7890):720-6. Epub 2021/12/10. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04137-3. PubMed PMID: 34880500.

14. Carter JD, Dula SB, Corbin KL, Wu R, Nunemaker CS. A practical guide to rodent islet isolation and assessment. Biol Proced Online. 2009;11:3-31. Epub 2009/12/04. doi: 10.1007/s12575-009-9021-0. PubMed PMID: 19957062; PMCID: PMC3056052.

15. Chen IS, Kubo Y. Ivermectin and its target molecules: shared and unique modulation mechanisms of ion channels and receptors by ivermectin. J Physiol. 2018;596(10):1833-45. Epub 2017/10/25. doi: 10.1113/JP275236. PubMed PMID: 29063617; PMCID: PMC5978302.

16. Dawson GR, Wafford KA, Smith A, Marshall GR, Bayley PJ, Schaeffer JM, Meinke PT, McKernan RM. Anticonvulsant and adverse effects of avermectin analogs in mice are mediated through the γ-aminobutyric acid(A) receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000;295(3):1051-60. Epub 2000/11/18. PubMed PMID: 11082440.

17. Gilon P, Henquin JC. Mechanisms and physiological significance of the cholinergic control of pancreatic β-cell function. Endocr Rev. 2001;22(5):565-604. Epub 2001/10/06. doi: 10.1210/edrv.22.5.0440. PubMed PMID: 11588141.

18. Leon C, Freund M, Latchoumanin O, Farret A, Petit P, Cazenave JP, Gachet C. The P2Y(1) receptor is involved in the maintenance of glucose homeostasis and in insulin secretion in mice. Purinergic Signal. 2005;1(2):145-51. Epub 2008/04/12. doi: 10.1007/s11302-005-6209-x. PubMed PMID: 18404499; PMCID: PMC2096536.

19. Bowler JW, Bailey RJ, North RA, Surprenant A. P2X4, P2Y1 and P2Y2 receptors on rat alveolar macrophages. Br J Pharmacol. 2003;140(3):567-75. Epub 2003/09/13. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705459. PubMed PMID: 12970084; PMCID: PMC1574050.

20. Hansen MR, Krabbe S, Novak I. Purinergic receptors and calcium signalling in human pancreatic duct cell lines. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2008;22(1-4):157-68. Epub 2008/09/05. doi: 10.1159/000149793. PubMed PMID: 18769042.

21. von der Kammer H, Demiralay C, Andresen B, Albrecht C, Mayhaus M, Nitsch RM. Regulation of gene expression by muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Biochem Soc Symp. 2001(67):131-40. Epub 2001/07/13. doi: 10.1042/bss0670131. PubMed PMID: 11447829.

22. Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM, Aach J, Guell M, DiCarlo JE, Norville JE, Church GM. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science. 2013;339(6121):823-6. Epub 2013/01/05. doi: 10.1126/science.1232033. PubMed PMID: 23287722; PMCID: PMC3712628.

23. Ran FA, Hsu PD, Wright J, Agarwala V, Scott DA, Zhang F. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Protoc. 2013;8(11):2281-308. Epub 2013/10/26. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.143. PubMed PMID: 24157548; PMCID: PMC3969860.

24. Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell. 2014;157(6):1262-78. Epub 2014/06/07. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010. PubMed PMID: 24906146; PMCID: PMC4343198.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75132.sa2

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Biliana Marcheva

    Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Contributed equally with
    Benjamin J Weidemann and Akihiko Taguchi
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8697-2625

  2. Benjamin J Weidemann

    Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Contributed equally with
    Biliana Marcheva and Akihiko Taguchi
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3747-2744

  3. Akihiko Taguchi

    1. Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States
    2. Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, Hematological Science and Therapeutics, Department of Bio-Signal Analysis, Yamaguchi University, Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1, Yamaguchi, Japan
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Contributed equally with
    Biliana Marcheva and Benjamin J Weidemann
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  4. Mark Perelis

    1. Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States
    2. Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Carlsbad, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    Mark Perelis is affiliated with Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc The author has no financial interests to declare

  5. Kathryn Moynihan Ramsey

    Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0691-7835

  6. Marsha V Newman

    Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  7. Yumiko Kobayashi

    Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation, Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  8. Chiaki Omura

    Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation, Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  9. Jocelyn E Manning Fox

    Department of Pharmacology, Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  10. Haopeng Lin

    Department of Pharmacology, Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  11. Patrick E Macdonald

    Department of Pharmacology, Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  12. Joseph Bass

    Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    j-bass@northwestern.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1602-8601

Funding

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK090625)

  • Joseph Bass

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK127800)

  • Joseph Bass

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK050203)

  • Joseph Bass

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK113011)

  • Joseph Bass

National Institute on Aging (P01AG011412)

  • Joseph Bass

National Institute on Aging (R01AG065988)

  • Joseph Bass

Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation United States of America (17-2013-511)

  • Joseph Bass

Chicago Biomedical Consortium (S-007)

  • Joseph Bass

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK007169)

  • Biliana Marcheva

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (F30DK116481)

  • Benjamin J Weidemann

Manpei Suzuki Diabetes Foundation

  • Akihiko Taguchi

Sino-Canadian Studentship

  • Haopeng Lin

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR: 148451)

  • Patrick E Macdonald

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank all members of the Bass laboratory, Dr. Grant Barish, Dr. Lisa Beutler, and Dr. Richard Miller for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript. We also thank Shun Kobayashi for technical assistance and Dr. Clara Bien Peek for the Cry1-/-;Cry2-/- mice. We thank the Human Organ Procurement and Exchange (HOPE) program and Trillium Gift of Life Network (TGLN) for their work in procuring human donor pancreas for research. Finally, we especially thank the organ donors and their families for their kind gift in support of diabetes research.

Ethics

Human islet isolations and human islet cell biology experiments were performed at the Alberta Diabetes Institute IsletCore and approved by the University of Alberta Human Research Ethics Board (approval identifiers: Pro00013094, Pro00001754). Organ donation was coordinated by the appropriate regional organ procurement organization, including obtaining written next-of-kin consent for use of donor organs in this study. Donor organs were de-identified by the organ procurement organization prior to shipment to the Alberta Diabetes Institute IsletCore, and no identifying donor information was made available to the research team.

All animal care and use procedures were conducted in accordance with regulation of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Northwestern University under protocols IS00000466, IS00003253, IS00008732, IS0005838.

Senior Editor

  1. Didier YR Stainier, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Germany

Reviewing Editor

  1. Achim Kramer, Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Germany

Reviewer

  1. Charna Dibner, University of Geneva, Switzerland

Version history

  1. Received: October 29, 2021
  2. Preprint posted: November 5, 2021 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: January 21, 2022
  4. Version of Record published: February 21, 2022 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2022, Marcheva et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,150
    Page views
  • 206
    Downloads
  • 3
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Biliana Marcheva
  2. Benjamin J Weidemann
  3. Akihiko Taguchi
  4. Mark Perelis
  5. Kathryn Moynihan Ramsey
  6. Marsha V Newman
  7. Yumiko Kobayashi
  8. Chiaki Omura
  9. Jocelyn E Manning Fox
  10. Haopeng Lin
  11. Patrick E Macdonald
  12. Joseph Bass
(2022)
P2Y1 purinergic receptor identified as a diabetes target in a small-molecule screen to reverse circadian β-cell failure
eLife 11:e75132.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75132

Categories and tags

Research organisms

Further reading

  1. Listen to Joe Bass talk about diabetes and the body clock.

    Podcast

    The circadian rhythm is tightly linked to the release of insulin

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease

    A cell wall synthase accelerates plasma membrane partitioning in mycobacteria

    Takehiro Kado, Zarina Akbary ... M Sloan Siegrist
    Research Article Updated

    Lateral partitioning of proteins and lipids shapes membrane function. In model membranes, partitioning can be influenced both by bilayer-intrinsic factors like molecular composition and by bilayer-extrinsic factors such as interactions with other membranes and solid supports. While cellular membranes can departition in response to bilayer-intrinsic or -extrinsic disruptions, the mechanisms by which they partition de novo are largely unknown. The plasma membrane of Mycobacterium smegmatis spatially and biochemically departitions in response to the fluidizing agent benzyl alcohol, then repartitions upon fluidizer washout. By screening for mutants that are sensitive to benzyl alcohol, we show that the bifunctional cell wall synthase PonA2 promotes membrane partitioning and cell growth during recovery from benzyl alcohol exposure. PonA2’s role in membrane repartitioning and regrowth depends solely on its conserved transglycosylase domain. Active cell wall polymerization promotes de novo membrane partitioning and the completed cell wall polymer helps to maintain membrane partitioning. Our work highlights the complexity of membrane–cell wall interactions and establishes a facile model system for departitioning and repartitioning cellular membranes.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology

    Continuous sensing of nutrients and growth factors by the mTORC1-TFEB axis

    Breanne Sparta, Nont Kosaisawe ... John G Albeck
    Research Article Updated

    mTORC1 senses nutrients and growth factors and phosphorylates downstream targets, including the transcription factor TFEB, to coordinate metabolic supply and demand. These functions position mTORC1 as a central controller of cellular homeostasis, but the behavior of this system in individual cells has not been well characterized. Here, we provide measurements necessary to refine quantitative models for mTORC1 as a metabolic controller. We developed a series of fluorescent protein-TFEB fusions and a multiplexed immunofluorescence approach to investigate how combinations of stimuli jointly regulate mTORC1 signaling at the single-cell level. Live imaging of individual MCF10A cells confirmed that mTORC1-TFEB signaling responds continuously to individual, sequential, or simultaneous treatment with amino acids and the growth factor insulin. Under physiologically relevant concentrations of amino acids, we observe correlated fluctuations in TFEB, AMPK, and AKT signaling that indicate continuous activity adjustments to nutrient availability. Using partial least squares regression modeling, we show that these continuous gradations are connected to protein synthesis rate via a distributed network of mTORC1 effectors, providing quantitative support for the qualitative model of mTORC1 as a homeostatic controller and clarifying its functional behavior within individual cells.