Comprehensive fitness landscape of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro reveals insights into viral resistance mechanisms

  1. Julia M Flynn  Is a corresponding author
  2. Neha Samant
  3. Gily Schneider-Nachum
  4. David T Bakan
  5. Nese Kurt Yilmaz
  6. Celia A Schiffer
  7. Stephanie A Moquin
  8. Dustin Dovala
  9. Daniel NA Bolon  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Massachusetts Medical School, United States
  2. Novartis, United States

Abstract

With the continual evolution of new strains of SARS-CoV-2 that are more virulent, transmissible, and able to evade current vaccines, there is an urgent need for effective anti-viral drugs SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) is a leading target for drug design due to its conserved and indispensable role in the viral life cycle. Drugs targeting Mpro appear promising but will elicit selection pressure for resistance. To understand resistance potential in Mpro, we performed a comprehensive mutational scan of the protease that analyzed the function of all possible single amino acid changes. We developed three separate high-throughput assays of Mpro function in yeast, based on either the ability of Mpro variants to cleave at a defined cut-site or on the toxicity of their expression to yeast. We used deep sequencing to quantify the functional effects of each variant in each screen. The protein fitness landscapes from all three screens were strongly correlated, indicating that they captured the biophysical properties critical to Mpro function. The fitness landscapes revealed a non-active site location on the surface that is extremely sensitive to mutation making it a favorable location to target with inhibitors. In addition, we found a network of critical amino acids that physically bridge the two active sites of the Mpro dimer. The clinical variants of Mpro were predominantly functional in our screens, indicating that Mpro is under strong selection pressure in the human population. Our results provide predictions of mutations that will be readily accessible to Mpro evolution and that are likely to contribute to drug resistance. This complete mutational guide of Mpro can be used in the design of inhibitors with reduced potential of evolving viral resistance.

Data availability

Next generation sequencing data has been deposited to the NCBI short read archive (PRJNA842255). Tabulated raw counts of all variants in all replicates are included in Figure 2 - source data 1. Figure 2 - source data 1, Figure 4 - source data 1, Figure 4 - source data 2, and Figure 5 - source data 1 contain the data used to generate all the figures.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Julia M Flynn

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    For correspondence
    Julia.Flynn@umassmed.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5490-393X
  2. Neha Samant

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Gily Schneider-Nachum

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. David T Bakan

    Novartis, Emeryville, United States
    Competing interests
    David T Bakan, is an employee of Novartis..
  5. Nese Kurt Yilmaz

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Celia A Schiffer

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2270-6613
  7. Stephanie A Moquin

    Novartis, Emeryville, United States
    Competing interests
    Stephanie A Moquin, is an employee of Novartis..
  8. Dustin Dovala

    Novartis, Emeryville, United States
    Competing interests
    Dustin Dovala, is an employee of Novartis..
  9. Daniel NA Bolon

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    For correspondence
    Dan.Bolon@umassmed.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5857-6676

Funding

Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research

  • Julia M Flynn
  • Neha Samant
  • Gily Schneider-Nachum
  • Nese Kurt Yilmaz
  • Celia A Schiffer
  • Daniel NA Bolon

DTB, SAM, and DD are employees of Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research and were involved in study design, data interpretation, and preparation of this manuscript.

Reviewing Editor

  1. C Brandon Ogbunugafor, Yale University, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: January 26, 2022 (view preprint)
  2. Received: January 28, 2022
  3. Accepted: June 17, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: June 20, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: July 26, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Flynn et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,795
    views
  • 539
    downloads
  • 56
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Julia M Flynn
  2. Neha Samant
  3. Gily Schneider-Nachum
  4. David T Bakan
  5. Nese Kurt Yilmaz
  6. Celia A Schiffer
  7. Stephanie A Moquin
  8. Dustin Dovala
  9. Daniel NA Bolon
(2022)
Comprehensive fitness landscape of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro reveals insights into viral resistance mechanisms
eLife 11:e77433.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77433

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77433

Further reading

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Medicine
    3. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Edited by Diane M Harper et al.
    Collection

    eLife has published the following articles on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Zachary H Williams, Alvaro Dafonte Imedio ... Welkin E Johnson
    Research Article

    HERV-K(HML-2), the youngest clade of human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs), includes many intact or nearly intact proviruses, but no replication competent HML-2 proviruses have been identified in humans. HML-2-related proviruses are present in other primates, including rhesus macaques, but the extent and timing of HML-2 activity in macaques remains unclear. We have identified 145 HML-2-like proviruses in rhesus macaques, including a clade of young, rhesus-specific insertions. Age estimates, intact ORFs, and insertional polymorphism of these insertions are consistent with recent or ongoing infectious activity in macaques. 106 of the proviruses form a clade characterized by an ~750 bp sequence between env and the 3' LTR, derived from an ancient recombination with a HERV-K(HML-8)-related virus. This clade is found in Old World monkeys (OWM), but not great apes, suggesting it originated after the ape/OWM split. We identified similar proviruses in white-cheeked gibbons; the gibbon insertions cluster within the OWM recombinant clade, suggesting interspecies transmission from OWM to gibbons. The LTRs of the youngest proviruses have deletions in U3, which disrupt the Rec Response Element (RcRE), required for nuclear export of unspliced viral RNA. We show that the HML-8 derived region functions as a Rec-independent constitutive transport element (CTE), indicating the ancestral Rec-RcRE export system was replaced by a CTE mechanism.