Research Article

Obligate sexual reproduction of a homothallic fungus closely related to the Cryptococcus pathogenic species complex

Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, United States
Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, United States
Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Netherlands
Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
Génomique Métabolique, CNRS, University Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, France
Lehrstuhl für Molekulare und Zelluläre Botanik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany

Jun 17, 2022

Download
Cite
CommentOpen annotations (there are currently 0 annotations on this page).
Share

592 views

Article
Figures and data
Abstract
Editor's evaluation
eLife digest
Introduction
Results
Discussion
Materials and methods
Data availability
References
Decision letter
Author response
Article and author information
Metrics

Abstract

Sexual reproduction is a ubiquitous, ancient eukaryotic trait. While most sexual organisms have to find a mating partner, species as diverse as animals, plants, and fungi have evolved the ability to reproduce sexually without requiring another individual. Here, we uncovered the mechanism of self-compatibility (homothallism) in Cryptococcus depauperatus, a fungal species closely related to the human fungal pathogens Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii. In contrast to C. neoformans or C. gattii, which grow as a yeast asexually, and produce hyphae, basidia, and infectious spores during sexual reproduction, C. depauperatus grows exclusively as hyphae decorated with basidia and abundant spores, thus continuously engaged in sexual reproduction. Through comparative genomics and analyses of mutants defective in key mating/meiosis genes, we demonstrate the C. depauperatus sexual cycle involves meiosis and that self-compatibility is orchestrated by an unlinked mating receptor (Ste3a) and pheromone ligand (MFα) pair derived from opposite mating types of a heterothallic (self-sterile) ancestor. We identified a putative mating-type (MAT) determining region containing genes phylogenetically aligned with MATa alleles of other species, and a few MATα gene alleles scattered throughout the genome, but no homologs of the mating-type homeodomain genes SXI1 (HD1) and SXI2 (HD2). Comparative analyses suggest a dramatic remodeling of the MAT locus possibly owing to reduced selective constraints to maintain mating-type genes in tight linkage, associated with a transition to self-fertility. Our findings support C. depauperatus as an obligately sexual, homothallic fungus and provide insight into repeated transitions between sexual reproduction modes that have occurred throughout the fungal kingdom.

Editor's evaluation

There are various ways in which self-fertility has arisen in the fungal kingdom. This study describes a novel form of self-fertility that evolved in a species closely related to the Cryptococcus species causing serious human lung and brain infections, in which sexual development is achieved by self-signaling of a cognate pheromone and pheromone-receptor pair. Through a combination of high-quality genomic analysis and experimental gene expression and manipulation work, the study significantly adds to our understanding of the evolution and flexibility of fungal breeding systems.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79114.sa0

eLife digest

Fungi are enigmatic organisms that flourish in soil, on decaying plants, or during infection of animals or plants. Growing in myriad forms, from single-celled yeast to multicellular molds and mushrooms, fungi have also evolved a variety of strategies to reproduce. Normally, fungi reproduce in one of two ways: either they reproduce asexually, with one individual producing a new individual identical to itself, or they reproduce sexually, with two individuals of different ‘mating types’ contributing to produce a new individual. However, individuals of some species exhibit ‘homothallism’ or self-fertility: these individuals can produce reproductive cells that are universally compatible, and therefore can reproduce sexually with themselves or with any other cell in the population.

Homothallism has evolved multiple times throughout the fungal kingdom, suggesting it confers advantage when population numbers are low or mates are hard to find. Yet some homothallic fungi been overlooked compared to heterothallic species, whose mating types have been well characterised. Understanding the genetic basis of homothallism and how it evolved in different species can provide insights into pathogenic species that cause fungal disease.

With that in mind, Passer, Clancey et al. explored the genetic basis of homothallism in Cryptococcus depauperatus, a close relative of C. neoformans, a species that causes fungal infections in humans. A combination of genetic sequencing techniques and experiments were applied to analyse, compare, and manipulate C. depauperatus’ genome to see how this species evolved self-fertility.

Passer, Clancey et al. showed that C. depauperatus evolved the ability to reproduce sexually by itself via a unique evolutionary pathway. The result is a form of homothallism never reported in fungi before. C. depauperatus lost some of the genes that control mating in other species of fungi, and acquired genes from the opposing mating types of a heterothallic ancestor to become self-fertile.

Passer, Clancey et al. also found that, unlike other Cryptococcus species that switch between asexual and sexual reproduction, C. depauperatus grows only as long, branching filaments called hyphae, a sexual form. The species reproduces sexually with itself throughout its life cycle and is unable to produce a yeast (asexual) form, in contrast to other closely related species.

This work offers new insights into how different modes of sexual reproduction have evolved in fungi. It also provides another interesting case of how genome plasticity and evolutionary pressures can produce similar outcomes, homothallism, via different evolutionary paths. Lastly, assembling the complete genome of C. depauperatus will foster comparative studies between pathogenic and non-pathogenic Cryptococcus species.

Introduction

Sexual reproduction, generally defined as the production of viable and fertile offspring by combining genetic information from mating partners of two different types, is a process conserved across the eukaryotic tree of life (Goodenough and Heitman, 2014; Heitman, 2015). Sexual reproduction has many benefits, such as generating novel genetic combinations and removing deleterious mutations (Agrawal and Whitlock, 2012), but it also has many costs, in that it is energetically expensive, time-consuming, and in some species two parents are required to produce one progeny. Therefore, some organisms, such as fungi, balance sexual reproduction with asexual mitotic cycles in order to populate an environmental niche (a strategy known as facultative sexual reproduction) (Williams, 1975; Maynard-Smith, 1978).

In fungi, sexual reproduction usually involves the fusion of haploid partners of opposite mating type, a situation known as heterothallism. The mechanisms of mating compatibility under heterothallism are quite diverse across fungal taxa and frequently involve genomic structures ranging from a mating-type (MAT) locus region containing only one or two genes (e.g., the Mucoromycota and Ascomycota phyla) (Bennett and Turgeon, 2016; Lee and Idnurm, 2017), to highly complex regions containing several genes at one (bipolar) or two (tetrapolar) MAT loci (e.g., most Basidiomycota) (Coelho et al., 2017), and even to mating-type chromosomes that exhibit large non-recombining regions resembling sex chromosomes of plants and animals (e.g., Microbotryum spp. and Neurospora tetrasperma) (Menkis et al., 2008; Branco et al., 2017; Sun et al., 2017; Branco et al., 2018). In most of these systems, and similar to the presence of separate sexes in different individuals in animals and plants, the probability of encountering a suitable mating partner when only two mating types exist in a population at equilibrium cannot exceed 50%, which may pose a substantial fitness reduction in environments where population densities are very low and compatible mating partners are scarce (Hoekstra, 1987). As a possible evolutionary response to such selective pressures, many fungal species evolved the ability to reproduce sexually without the need for another individual, a state known as homothallism (Ni et al., 2011; Wilson et al., 2015), analogous to the evolution of hermaphroditism or parthenogenesis in plants and animals (Jarne and Charlesworth, 1993; Neaves and Baumann, 2011; Busch and Delph, 2012). In such fungi, haploid cells are universally compatible for mating, and a single isolate can undergo sexual reproduction alone (Ni et al., 2011; Wilson et al., 2015). This is usually achieved either by combining the genes of opposite mating types within a single genome or by undergoing mating-type switching (Ni et al., 2011; Gioti et al., 2012; Fu et al., 2015; Wilson et al., 2015; David-Palma et al., 2016; Krassowski et al., 2019; Cabrita et al., 2021).

Homothallism in fungi evolved multiple times independently (Billiard et al., 2012; Gioti et al., 2012; Wilson et al., 2015; Hanson and Wolfe, 2017; Krassowski et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2019b; Cabrita et al., 2021), indicating that it provides a selective advantage under certain conditions, for instance, (i) to allow reproductive assurance, which may be a substantial benefit in patchy habitats (Murtagh et al., 2000; Nieuwenhuis and Immler, 2016; Nieuwenhuis et al., 2018), (ii) to increase compatibility to promote outcrossing (Heitman, 2015), or (iii) even to reduce outbreeding depression by avoiding breaking up locally co-adapted gene complexes (Epinat and Lenormand, 2009), which has been hypothesized to be advantageous for pathogenic fungi (Alby et al., 2009; Heitman, 2010; Hauser, 2021).

Cryptococcus is a fungal genus within the Basidiomycota that comprises both pathogenic and closely related non-pathogenic saprobic species. The non-pathogenic species currently include Cryptococcus wingfieldii, Cryptococcus amylolentus, Cryptococcus floricola, Cryptococcus depauperatus, and Cryptococcus luteus (Liu et al., 2015; Passer et al., 2019). The pathogenic clade, which is responsible for over 200,000 human infections annually (Rajasingham et al., 2017), currently has seven recognized species distributed into three subgroups: Cryptococcus neoformans, Cryptococcus deneoformans, and the Cryptococcus gattii species complex (Hagen et al., 2015). A new lineage within the C. gattii species complex has recently been isolated from middens, midden soil, or tree holes associated with the Southern tree hyrax (Dendrohyrax arboreus) in Zambia and termed C. gattii VGV; no human infections have thus far been attributed to this novel lineage (Farrer et al., 2019).

The heterothallic reproductive cycle of C. neoformans and C. gattii (also designated as bisexual mating or opposite-sex mating) has been known since the 1970s and readily occurs under laboratory conditions (Kwon-Chung, 1975; Kwon-Chung, 1976a; Kwon-Chung, 1976b). All of the species in the pathogenic Cryptococcus species complex have a bipolar mating system, in which the α and a mating types are determined by a single, unusually large (∼120kb in size), MAT locus that encompasses more than 20 genes (Lengeler et al., 2002; Fraser et al., 2004; Loftus et al., 2005). Among these genes are those encoding the mating-type-specific pheromones (MFα or MFa) and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) (Ste3α or Ste3a) that initiate recognition of compatible mating partners, and the homeodomain transcription factors (HD1/Sxi1α or HD2/Sxi2a), which establish cell-type identity and orchestrate progression through the sexual cycle (Hull et al., 2005; Sun et al., 2019a). In addition, the MAT locus contains essential genes (Fraser et al., 2004; Ianiri et al., 2020) and genes that contribute to virulence (Sun et al., 2019a). Importantly, comparative genomic studies with the closely related species C. amylolentus uncovered that the single MAT locus in the pathogenic Cryptococcus species is the result of a fusion of ancestrally unlinked pheromone/receptor (P/R) and homeodomain (HD) loci, possibly initiated through ectopic inter-centromeric recombination (Sun et al., 2017).

Under the proper environmental conditions (e.g., V8 media in dark, dry conditions), Cryptococcus cells secrete pheromones unique to the mating type of the cell (a cells produce the MFa pheromone, and α cells produce the MFα pheromone) (Davidson et al., 2000; McClelland et al., 2002). These pheromones bind to the Ste3α and Ste3a receptors, respectively, which signal through the Ste20 protein to a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade that includes the Ste11, Ste7, Cpk1, and Ste50 proteins (Sun et al., 2019a; Zhao et al., 2019). The final target of this signaling cascade is the transcription factor Mat2 (Lin et al., 2010; Feretzaki and Heitman, 2013), which directly or indirectly activates genes involved in mating and the yeast-to-hyphal morphological transition, initiated by the MATα parent that extends a conjugation tube towards the enlarged MATa mating partner (Zhao et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2020). The two mating partners fuse to form a dikaryotic zygote from which a hyphal filament protrudes and extends to form a dikaryotic hypha. During hyphal growth, fused clamp connections form across the septa to ensure that each hyphal compartment maintains two unfused, paired parental nuclei (Kwon-Chung, 1976b; Lin, 2009). Following the extension of the hyphal filament, the tip differentiates into a basidium, in which karyogamy and meiosis occur followed by repeated mitotic divisions to produce four chains of spores. Eventually, the spores are released from the basidia, disseminate (acting as infectious propagules) (Reedy et al., 2007; Velagapudi et al., 2009), and grow as yeast cells until encountering mating stimuli again (Kwon-Chung, 1975; Kwon-Chung, 1976b; Sun et al., 2019c; Zhao et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2020).

C. deneoformans and C. gattii can also participate in an unusual form of homothallism, termed unisexual reproduction, during which haploid cells of a single mating type undergo ploidy changes and meiosis to produce genetically identical progeny (Lin et al., 2005; Lin et al., 2010; Ni et al., 2011; Feretzaki and Heitman, 2013; Ni et al., 2013; Fu et al., 2015; Wilson et al., 2021). The features of unisexual reproduction are similar to those observed during opposite-sex mating, and there are two ways in which unisexual reproduction is initiated: (i) two cells of the same mating type can fuse, produce hyphae with unfused clamp connections (termed a monokaryon), form basidia, and basidiospores, or (ii) a single cell can undergo endoreplication forming a diploid cell that then produces a similar hyphal filament and completes the sexual cycle (Lin et al., 2005; Zhao et al., 2019).

Interestingly, many of the species that are closely related to members of the pathogenic Cryptococcus species, such as C. amylolentus, C. depauperatus, and C. luteus, are not known to cause disease in plants or animals (Findley et al., 2009; Rodriguez-Carres et al., 2010) and are instead regarded as saprobes or mycoparasites (i.e., parasites of other fungi) (Sivakumaran et al., 2003; Begerow et al., 2017). C. depauperatus, in particular, was first identified by Petch, 1931 on scale insects and originally described as the type specimen of Aspergillus depauperatus. Although initially considered as an insect-associated fungus, C. depauperatus was later reassessed as a possible mycoparasite of the entomopathogenic fungus Akanthomyces lecanii considering that (i) specimens from which C. depauperatus had been isolated or identified from also contained A. lecanii (Petch, 1931; Malloch et al., 1978; Samson et al., 1983; Kubátová, 1992), and (ii) the fact that C. depauperatus, as with other mycoparasitic basidiomycetes, can produce haustorial branches (Ginns and Malloch, 2003). There are only two strains of C. depauperatus available: CBS7841, which was isolated from a dead spider in Canada (Malloch et al., 1978), and CBS7855, which was isolated from a dead caterpillar in the Czech Republic (Kubátová, 1992). Interestingly, C. depauperatus, possibly along with C. luteus, are the only naturally occurring Cryptococcus species with no known yeast phase (Malloch et al., 1978; Kwon-Chung et al., 1995; Roberts, 1997; Ginns and Bernicchia, 2000). Indeed, in contrast to the dimorphic growth of C. neoformans and C. gattii, which are usually yeasts in the asexual stage and produce hyphae, basidia, and basidiospores during the sexual stage, C. depauperatus grows by continuously producing hyphae, basidia, and basidiospores under typical laboratory conditions (Kwon-Chung et al., 1995) with no budding yeast cells observed during its entire life cycle. This species also displays a slow growth phenotype compared to other Cryptococcus species (Findley et al., 2009), possibly as a consequence of being continuously engaged in an energetically costly sexual cycle. Early data from fluorescent-activated cell sorting (FACS) indicates the spores are haploid, and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analyses found the two strains to be genetically distinct (Rodriguez-Carres et al., 2010). Given the geographical range of the two isolates, they may represent different populations or even isolates of two closely related but distinct species. However, given the small sample size (n = 2), it is difficult to know if these differences are strain- or species-specific.

Considering the striking resemblance of its growth with the sexual life cycle of other Cryptococcus species, the hypothesis was put forth that C. depauperatus is homothallic and only the sexual developmental program is active at any given time during the life cycle of this species (Malloch et al., 1978; Kwon-Chung et al., 1995; Rodriguez-Carres et al., 2010). However, to date, a thorough characterization of the C. depauperatus genomes has not been completed, leaving unanswered questions. Here, we carried out an in-depth genomic, genetic, and phenotypic study of C. depauperatus. Newly generated chromosome-level genome assemblies of CBS7841 and CB7855 revealed 98% genome-wide shared identity and a uniform pattern of divergence across the genome. We found a putative MAT locus containing genes phylogenetically aligned with MATa alleles of other species, as well as a few unlinked MATα gene alleles, including the MFα gene, but no homologs of the mating-type determinants SXI1 and SXI2. This led to the hypothesis that compatible pheromone and pheromone-receptor genes could be the key components underlying the homothallic mating behavior of C. depauperatus. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation was developed to delete genes by homologous recombination. Deletion of key mating and meiosis genes (MFα, STE3, and DMC1) showed severe defects in basidia and/or spore production, but not in hyphal growth. Furthermore, with the first genetic mutants isolated in this species, we identified recombinant meiotic progeny generated from intra-strain genetic crosses. These data support the hypothesis that C. depauperatus is an obligately sexual, homothallic fungal species.

Results

CBS7841 and CBS7855 genomes are overall syntenic and present homogeneous genome-wide divergence

To establish the basis of the C. depauperatus sexual cycle and explore the genomic variation between the two available isolates, we sequenced, assembled, and annotated the genomes of CBS7841 and CBS7855 with both Oxford Nanopore and Illumina reads. The resulting assemblies are approximately 16.28 Mb (CBS7841) and 16.33 Mb (CBS7855) in size and comprised eight contigs with telomeric repeats TAA(C)_4,5 at both ends, corresponding to eight chromosomes (Figure 1, Figure 1—figure supplement 1). Each contig contains a large, open reading frame (ORF)-free region, rich in long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons, which have been shown to be coincident with centromeres in other Cryptococcus species (Janbon et al., 2014; Sun et al., 2017; Yadav et al., 2018; Schotanus and Heitman, 2020) and are predicted to constitute functional centromeres in C. depauperatus (Figure 1A).

Figure 1 with 5 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Genome-wide comparison between the two C. *depauperatus* strains and phylogenetic placement of *C. depauperatus*.

(A) Circos plot comparing the genome assemblies of *C. depauperatus* CBS7841 and CBS7855. The two assemblies are overall syntenic, except for five inversions (labelled ‘a’ to ‘e’; see Figure 1—figure supplement 2 for details). Other genomic features are depicted in different tracks for each chromosome, as shown in the key. (B) Genome-based phylogeny recovers *C. depauperatus* as a sister species to the human pathogenic *Cryptococcus* clade. The tree was inferred by maximum likelihood using a concatenation-based approach on a data matrix composed of protein alignments of 4074 single-copy genes shared across selected strains of seven *Cryptococcus* species and an outgroup (*Kwoniella mangrovensis*). Log-likelihood of the tree: lnL = –16948764.2158. A coalescence-based tree topology inference obtained by ASTRAL was completely congruent with the concatenation-based phylogeny (see Figure 1—figure supplement 5). The reliability of each internal branch was evaluated by 1000 replicates of the Shimodaira–Hasegawa approximate likelihood ratio test (SH-aLRT) and ultrafast bootstrap (UFboot) in the concatenation-based tree, and local posterior probability (LPP) in the coalescence-based tree. Branch lengths are given in number of substitutions per site (scale bar). For each branch of the tree, three additional measures of genealogical concordance are shown: the gene concordance factor (gCF), the site concordance factor (sCF), and quartet support for the main topology (q1)(see ‘Materials and methods’ for details). Scanning electron microscopy images illustrating sexual reproductive structures (basidia with spore chains) of *C. neoformans* (H99 × KN99; top), *C. depauperatus* CBS7841 (middle) and *C. amylolentus* (CBS6039 × CBS6273; bottom). Scale bars = 5μm.

Gene prediction and annotation identified 6342 and 6329 protein-coding genes, respectively, for CBS7841 and CBS7855. These numbers are in the lower range among the number of genes predicted for other Cryptococcus species with complete genomes publicly available (ranging from 6405 in C. deuterogattii R254 to 8248 in C. amylolentus) (D’Souza et al., 2011; Janbon et al., 2014; Farrer et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2017; Passer et al., 2019; Gröhs Ferrareze et al., 2021). Analysis of Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) revealed a high level of completeness of gene sets, with over 90% of the full-length 4284 BUSCO genes (tremellomycetes_odb10 dataset) being present in both isolates (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). This indicates the lower number of protein-coding genes identified in C. depauperatus is not the result of systematic gene misannotation, but rather due to genome size contraction. Indeed, the genomes of the two C. depauperatus isolates are the smallest among the described Cryptococcus species (D’Souza et al., 2011; Janbon et al., 2014; Farrer et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2017; Passer et al., 2019; Gröhs Ferrareze et al., 2021).

According to the current genome assemblies, the chromosome structure seems to be overall conserved between the two C. depauperatus isolates, except for five inversions (two large and three small, of which four are coupled with duplicated sequences at the borders; Figure 1A, Figure 1—figure supplement 2), and the predicted centromeric regions that differ considerably in length between some of the homologous chromosomes (Figure 1—figure supplement 3). Electrophoretic karyotypes obtained by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were completely congruent with the contigs sizes for CBS7841, but revealed a few ambiguities for CBS7855, indicating there might be inherent chromosome instability in this strain (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C). The two isolates present ~2% divergence at the nucleotide level, similar to the average intra-lineage genetic divergence observed in species of the C. gattii complex (Farrer et al., 2015). A sliding window analysis detected a relatively uniform pattern of sequence divergence across the genome and no evidence of introgression between the two isolates as shown by the absence of genomic tracts with nearly zero sequence divergence (except for the rDNA array, composed of 18S-5.8S-28S, which is found as a single unit on Chr 1; Figure 1—figure supplement 4). Together, this suggests the two isolates are members of geographically diverging populations that have remained largely isolated since their divergence.

Whole-genome phylogenetic analyses place C. depauperatus as sister to the human pathogenic Cryptococcus clade

To establish evolutionary relationships between C. depauperatus and other Cryptococcus lineages, we identified 4074 single-copy orthologs shared across selected strains representing main Cryptococcus lineages, and Kwoniella mangrovensis as an outgroup (Figure 1B). Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic inference using both concatenation- and coalescent-based approaches yielded a species phylogeny where all of the internodes received full (100%) support and were recovered consistently in the phylogenies inferred by the two approaches (Figure 1B, Figure 1—figure supplement 5). In both analyses, C. depauperatus appears as sister group to the human pathogenic Cryptococcus clade composed of C. neoformans, C. deneoformans, and the C. gattii complex (Figure 1B). This phylogenetic placement was, however, inconsistent with previous studies (Findley et al., 2009; Passer et al., 2019) that provided clade support for the C. amylolentus complex as the closest relative of the human pathogenic Cryptococcus clade, though these studies employed fewer marker genes. To address these discrepancies, we first measured the genealogical concordance signal by quantifying the proportion of genes (gCF) or sites (sCF) that are concordant with a given branch in the species tree (see ‘Materials and methods’ for details). This analysis showed that the branch grouping C. depauperatus and the human pathogenic Cryptococcus species had indeed lower gCF and sCF values compared to other branches in the tree, indicative of some degree of phylogenetic conflict (Figure 1B). For example, an sCF of 34.4% for this branch implies that just over a third of the sites informative for this branch supports it. Second, we also examined the tree topologies frequencies supporting each of three competing hypotheses for resolution of each quartet tree obtained from the coalescent-based analysis (Figure 1—figure supplement 5). For every quartet tree, there are three possible topologies for how the taxa can be related (noted as T1, T2, and T3 in Figure 1—figure supplement 5). In this case, the coalescence-based analysis supported more strongly the main topology (T1), again grouping C. depauperatus with the human pathogenic Cryptococcus species, compared to the alternative topologies (T2 and T3; Figure 1—figure supplement 5). Combined, these analyses suggest that the topology recovered by both concatenation- and coalescent-based approaches represents the best resolution for the C. depauperatus placement within the species tree based on current methods and taxa sampling.

Conserved mating genes are found in linked and unlinked loci in the genome of C. depauperatus

To investigate the mechanisms of homothallism in C. depauperatus, we first examined the genomes regarding MAT gene content and organization. Orthology mapping of genes found within or next to the MAT locus in C. neoformans, or the P/R and HD loci in C. amylolentus (representing the likely ancestral state of the genus), identified 25 out of 32 genes analyzed in the genome of C. depauperatus (Figure 2—source data 1). Over half of these genes (n = 15) were confined to a region spanning ~190 kb on Chr 4 in both CBS7841 and CBS7855, which we designated as the putative MAT locus (Figure 2A, Figure 2—source data 1). Genes in this region with predicted key functions during mating include the pheromone receptor (STE3) and the p21-activated kinase (STE20) genes. The remaining 10 queried genes were found scattered throughout the genome, including STE11, RUM1, and BSP1 on Chr 7, STE12 and ETF1 on Chr 1, and a single mating pheromone (MF) precursor gene on Chr 6 (Figure 2A, Figure 2—source data 1) predicted to encode a 37-amino acid product with a C-terminal CAAX motif characteristic of fungal mating pheromones (Kües et al., 2011; Coelho et al., 2017; Figure 2B). Among the genes missing in C. depauperatus, it was surprising to note the complete absence of homologs of the homeodomain transcription factors SXI1 (HD1) and SXI2 (HD2) as these genes invariably have central roles in mating-type determination and regulation of the sexual cycle in other basidiomycetes (reviewed in Coelho et al., 2017). To validate this further, we performed domain-based searches for proteins containing homeodomains (InterPro entries: IPR008422 and IPR001356). This analysis yielded five significant candidate genes (IDs in CBS7841: L203_102494, L203_103760, L203_103764, L203_104414 and L203_104715), each with a recognizable ortholog in the C. neoformans genome: HOB2 (CNAG_01858), HOB7 (CNAG_05176), HOB6 (CNAG_05093), HOB3 (CNAG_06921), and HOB4 (CNAG_04586). A previous study in C. neoformans reported that these genes are general stress responsive transcription factors (Jung et al., 2015), and we presume they might have similar roles in C. depauperatus, thus different from the homeodomain transcription factors Sxi1 and Sxi2. Hence, C. depauperatus has lost both the SXI1 and the SXI2 genes representing, to our knowledge, a unique case in the Basidiomycota.

Figure 2 with 3 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

The predicted *MAT* locus of C. *depauperatus*.

(A) Circos plot depicting the distribution of BLASTN hits between the *C. amylolentus* chromosomes containing the *P/R* (Chr 10; links colored in teal blue) and HD (Chr 11; links colored in gold) *MAT* loci and the *C. depauperatus* CBS7841 chromosomes. Genes residing within the *MAT* locus of *C. neoformans* whose orthologs in *C. depauperatus* are predominantly clustered on Chr 4 (putative *MAT*) are depicted as small circles colored in teal blue and gold next to the chromosome tracks. Other small circles illustrate genes within (purple) or bordering (pink) the *C. neoformans MAT* locus that are found dispersed in the *C. depauperatus* genome (see Figure 2—source data 1). Other genomic features are as given in the legend of Figure 1A. (B) Sequence alignment of MFα/A1 and MFa/A2pheromone precursors showing that the *C. depauperatus* mature pheromone is highly similar to MFα/A1 pheromones of other *Cryptococcus* species. The black arrowhead denotes the predicted cleavage site, giving rise to the peptide moiety of the mature pheromone (indicated by a black bar). (C) Maximum likelihood phylogeny of Ste3α(A1)and Ste3a(A2)pheromone receptors from different *Cryptococcus* species and *Kwoniella mangrovensis* (outgroup). *C. depauperatus* Ste3 sequences cluster together with a/A2alleles from other species. Internal branch support was assessed by 10,000 replicates of Shimodaira–Hasegawa approximate likelihood ratio test (SH-aLRT) and ultrafast bootstrap (UFboot) and are depicted by gray circles when well supported (>90%). Branch lengths are given in number of substitutions per site. (D) Synteny maps of the *C. amylolentus* CBS6039 *P/R* (top panel) and HD (bottom panel) *MAT* loci compared to the predicted *MAT* region of *C. depauperatus* CBS7841 and CBS7855. The regions spanning the proposed HD and *P/R* loci in *C. amylolentus* are highlighted in yellow. Genes at the predicted *MAT* region of *C. depauperatus* with a corresponding ortholog in *C. amylolentus* found within or flanking the *P/R* locus are colored, respectively, in dark or light teal blue. Genes flanking the HD locus in *C. amylolentus* with a corresponding ortholog in *C. depauperatus* at the predicted *MAT* region are shown in light gold, while those found within the fused *MAT* locus of *C. neoformans* are colored in dark gold. No homologs of the homeodomain transcription factor genes *HD1* (*SXI1*) and *HD2* (*SXI2*) were detected in the genome of *C. depauperatus*. Vertical gray or pink bars connect orthologs with the same or inverted orientation. Pink horizontal bars below the genes represent repeat-rich regions containing transposable elements or their remnants. ψ*MFa* indicates pheromone gene remnants in CBS6039, and the telomere of Chr 11 in *C. amylolentus* is depicted by a circled ‘T’.

Figure 2—source data 1 Genes within or adjacent to the C. neoformans H99 MAT locus or the P/R and HD MAT loci of C. amylolentus CBS6039, and corresponding orthologs in C. depauperatus.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/79114/elife-79114-fig2-data1-v2.xlsx
Download elife-79114-fig2-data1-v2.xlsx

The identification of MF and STE3 genes unlinked in the genome defined a second distinctive feature of C. depauperatus (Figure 2A). Sequence alignments and phylogenetic analyses further showed that the predicted product of the MF gene is highly similar to other α/A1 pheromones (Figure 2B), whereas Ste3 clusters together with a/A2 alleles from other Cryptococcus species (Figure 2C), indicating that they might constitute a compatible pheromone-receptor pair. This suggests a model where homothallism in C. depauperatus could have evolved through the combination of two mating types within the same haploid genome. By analyzing individual genealogies of other shared genes found in the C. neoformans MAT locus, we identified four additional genes (MYO2, STE12, STE11, and STE20) that displayed mating type-specific signatures (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). The MYO2 gene residing at the putative MAT locus of C. depauperatus grouped together with a/A2 alleles from other Cryptococcus species, representing the second instance (along with STE3) of a mating type a/A2 allele present at MAT. In contrast, the C. depauperatus STE11 and STE12 genes, which are both encoded outside the putative MAT locus, clustered together with other α/A1 alleles. Intriguingly, the C. depauperatus STE20 gene, although clustering more closely with α/A1 alleles, resides at the predicted MAT of C. depauperatus. One explanation could be that a recombination event, in the form of gene conversion, replaced STE20a with the corresponding α allele. Such gene conversion events were previously shown to occur in the MAT locus of C. neoformans (Sun et al., 2012). Interestingly, these four genes displayed different phylogenetic histories. The STE12, MYO2, and STE20 genes exhibited trans-specific polymorphism across all the Cryptococcus lineages, with alleles associated with the α/A1 mating type of all species branching together rather than each clustering with the a/A2 allele from the same species. Conversely, STE11 displayed trans-specific polymorphism only across the Cryptococcus pathogenic clade (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). This pattern suggests that STE12, MYO2, and STE20 became linked to MAT before the diversification of Cryptococcus, whereas STE11 was integrated into MAT more recently, possibly coinciding with the expansion of MAT in the common ancestor of the human pathogenic Cryptococcus clade (Fraser et al., 2004).

The C. depauperatus MAT locus contains genes associated with both HD and P/R loci of C. amylolentus suggestive of a past fusion event between the two regions

Given the phylogenetic placement of C. depauperatus, and the fact that many of the mating genes were found in unlinked loci in the genome, we wondered if the C. depauperatus MAT locus structure would resemble either that of the tetrapolar species C. amylolentus (Sun et al., 2017; Passer et al., 2019), with P/R and HD loci unlinked on separate chromosomes representing a more ancestral state, or mirror instead the derived bipolar configuration of C. neoformans where these two loci are genetically linked (Lengeler et al., 2002; Fraser et al., 2004). Whole-genome comparisons between C. amylolentus and C. depauperatus revealed that many regions of the C. amylolentus P/R- and HD-containing chromosomes (Chr 10 and Chr 11, respectively) are partially syntenic to Chr 4 of C. depauperatus, on which the MAT locus resides (Figure 2A, Figure 2—figure supplement 2A).

Detailed synteny maps further showed that several genes within or adjacent to the C. amylolentus HD and P/R loci are juxtaposed in C. depauperatus (Figure 2D), suggesting the two regions fused during evolution, presumably via chromosomal translocation. Through a similar comparison, we additionally found that most of the length of C. depauperatus Chr 4 corresponds to genomic segments of Chrs 1 and 5 of C. neoformans (Figure 2—figure supplements 2B and 3A). Importantly, an ~500 kb region on C. depauperatus Chr 4 surrounding the putative MAT locus largely combines two segments of C. neoformans Chr 5: one, more telomere-proximal, includes MAT and its neighboring regions; the other is centromere-proximal and contains some of the genes flanking C. neoformans CEN5 (Figure 2—figure supplement 3). It seems, however, the corresponding centromere in C. depauperatus was lost during evolution, possibly associated with gross chromosomal rearrangements. Other smaller segments of C. depauperatus Chr 4 correspond to regions of C. amylolentus Chrs 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 12 or Chrs 4, 6, 7, and 13 of C. neoformans (Figure 2—figure supplement 2), underscoring that a vast number of chromosomal rearrangements have occurred in these species since their last common ancestor.

Taken together, these findings indicate the putative MAT locus of C. depauperatus structurally resembles the derived bipolar MAT locus of C. neoformans but evolved independently and underwent substantial remodeling via genome reshuffling and gene loss.

Key mating and meiosis genes are present in C. depauperatus and upregulated during sporulation-inducing conditions

Meiosis in Cryptococcus occurs following karyogamy or endoreplication in basidia formed at the apexes of aerial hyphae to reduce the DNA content by half before sporulation. The genes that support a meiotic pathway, usually termed the ‘meiotic toolkit,’ are highly conserved from yeasts to humans (Schurko and Logsdon, 2008). Of the 30 genes defined as ‘core’ meiotic genes, all except MSH4 and MHS5 were unequivocally found in the C. depauperatus genomes (Figure 3—source data 1). The absence of Msh4 and Msh5 orthologs was confirmed by TBLASTN searches employing the C. neoformans genes as query sequences. Whereas this procedure failed to return orthologs in C. depauperatus, it could recover orthologs in other Cryptococcus species and detect paralogous hits in the C. depauperatus genomes (e.g., Msh2 and Msh6). Msh4 and Msh5 are components of the major crossover formation pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae coordinating crossing over with formation of the synaptonemal complex and are required for resolution of Holliday junctions, while two other partners, Mus81-Mms4/Eme1, participate in the minor pathway of crossover resolution (de los de los Santos et al., 2003; Argueso et al., 2004; Zakharyevich et al., 2012). Msh4-Msh5, but not Mus81-Mms4/Eme1, promotes crossovers that display interference. Therefore, the loss of Msh4-Msh5 in C. depauperatus suggests that some of the mechanisms of chromosome pairing, crossover formation, and resolution might be accomplished through a reduced machinery, although evidence for synaptonemal complexes in the basidia was provided by transmission electron microscopy in a previous study (Kwon-Chung et al., 1995).

Whole-genome sequencing of C. depauperatus revealed that key genes involved in mating-type determination and sexual development in other Cryptococcus species are not all found in a single MAT locus. As a result, we hypothesized that some of these genes could be under alternative regulation for gene expression, particularly those involved in karyogamy, mating, and meiosis. To determine whether we could observe activation of mating and meiosis genes in their native environment, we compared the transcriptomic profile of CBS7841 and CBS7855 grown under conditions that stimulate sporulation (growth on solid medium) and conditions that inhibit sporulation (growth in a liquid culture). RNA-seq analysis revealed 26 genes with a role in mating and meiosis (out of 95 genes evaluated; Figure 3—source data 1) that were differentially expressed under the conditions tested in at least one of the two strains, for log₂ fold change (FC) ≥±1 and a false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.05 in DESeq2, and P-value of 1 (in the corresponding direction) in LOX analyses (Figure 3A, Figure 3—source data 1). Among these genes, 12 are shared by the two strains and upregulated in conditions of sporulation (Figure 3B). Particularly striking was the upregulation of MFα, which had the highest expression level in CBS7841 (log₂ FC = 8.69 in DESeq2), and the significantly higher expression of genes involved in the pheromone response pathway (GPA2, GPG2, and STE3) and STE6, a gene that encodes the transporter for mature a- and α-pheromones (Figure 3; Hsueh and Shen, 2005). DMC1, which encodes a meiotic recombination protein that plays a central role in homologous recombination during meiosis (Bishop et al., 1992), was also upregulated during sporulation, as well as MND1 and HOP2 whose products form a complex to ensure proper chromosome paring and nuclear division (Tsubouchi and Roeder, 2002), and Rec8 that mediates cohesion between sister chromatids (Buonomo et al., 2000). CBS7855 also displayed upregulation of CPR2, a pheromone receptor-like gene that elicits unisexual reproduction in C. deneoformans when the corresponding ortholog is overexpressed (Hsueh et al., 2009). It is important to note that the observed expression differences between the two strains under the same experimental conditions may be due to intrinsic variability or result from different proportions of sporulating cells at the end of the incubation period prior to isolation of RNA. Overall, these findings suggest that the mating and meiotic pathways are functional and activated during sporulation in C. depauperatus.

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

C. *depauperatus* displays upregulation of key mating and meiotic genes in sporulating conditions.

(A) Heatmap of gene expression analysis of mating and meiosis-related genes for CBS7841 and CBS7855 (see Figure 3—source data 1 and Figure 3—source data 2 for the complete list of genes). Log₂ fold changes (log₂FC) for conditions conducive for sporulation (solid medium) vs. conditions that inhibited sporulation (liquid media) were determined with DESeq2 and LOX algorithms. Genes shown are differentially expressed in at least one of the two strains using the following thresholds for differential expression: log₂FC ≥ ±1, false discovery rate (FDR) (p-adj, DESeq2) ≤ 0.05, p-value=1 (LOX) in the corresponding direction. RNA-seq was performed in triplicate for each strain and condition, and the heatmap shows the mean values across samples. Clustering and generation of heatmaps was done in R (v3.5.1). (B) Venn diagram showing shared and unique differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the two strains relative to RNA-seq conditions reported in panel (A). Upregulated and downregulated genes are indicated, respectively, by orange and blue arrowheads, and key mating and meiotic DEGs in both strains are depicted in boldface.

Figure 3—source data 1 Mating and meiosis genes and their expression under sporulation (solid) vs. non-sporulation (liquid) conditions.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/79114/elife-79114-fig3-data1-v2.xlsx
Download elife-79114-fig3-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 3—source data 2 C. depauperatus gene expression analysis comparing sporulation (solid) vs. non-sporulation (liquid) conditions.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/79114/elife-79114-fig3-data2-v2.xlsx
Download elife-79114-fig3-data2-v2.xlsx

Ectopic expression of C. depauperatus MFα pheromone in C. neoformans induces hyphal formation

Our finding that MFα and STE3a coexist in the same haploid genome led us to hypothesize that the C. depauperatus sexual cycle might be initiated by an autocrine signaling loop wherein cells produce α pheromone that then binds to its cognate receptor (Ste3a) activating the downstream signaling cascades required for sexual development. To experimentally determine whether ectopic expression of C. depauperatus MFα gene could elicit a mating response in a strain that contains the receptor for MFα (STE3a), the MFα gene was cloned from C. depauperatus and introduced into the safe haven locus of C. neoformans MATa and MATα crg1Δ mutant strains (KN99a crg1Δ and H99α crg1Δ, respectively) (Arras et al., 2015). Crg1 is a regulator of G protein signaling that negatively regulates Gα proteins activated by the pheromone receptors (by stimulating GTP hydrolysis by Gα-GTP) and downregulates the signal from a pheromone-bound Ste3 receptor (Nielsen et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2004). Thus, crg1Δ mutants have been shown to be hypersensitive to mating stimuli (Fraser et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2004) and, therefore, can serve as a facile assay to detect aspects of mating. As predicted, expression of the C. depauperatus MFα pheromone gene (MFα_Cd) in the KN99a crg1Δ strain, but not in H99α crg1Δ, resulted in robust hyphal development on filament agar after 14 days of incubation (Figure 4A). This is functional evidence confirming that the C. depauperatus pheromone gene is of the α variety and that expression of the MFα gene outside of the MAT locus can induce filamentation.

Figure 4

Download asset Open asset

Ectopic expression of the C. *depauperatus MF*α gene in *C. neoformans* induces self-filamentation through Ste3 and Ste6.

(A) The *C. depauperatus MF*α gene was introduced ectopically into *C. neoformans MAT*α (H99α *crg1*Δ) and *MAT*a(KN99a *crg1*Δ) strains, and transformants harboring the transgene were assessed for their ability to filament. Light microscopy images of cell patches on filament agar after 6days of incubation at room temperature in the dark. Scale bars represent 50μm for all images except for the KN99a MFα*_Cd* transformants, where it denotes 100μm. (B) *STE3* and *STE6* deletion mutants were constructed in the modified KN99a *crg1*Δ MFα*_Cd* self-filamentous strain. After incubation on filament agar, no filamentation was observed in the *ste3*Δ and *ste6*Δ mutants, indicating that both proteins are required for MFα*_Cd* to stimulate self-filamentation in *C. neoformans*. All scale bars represent 50μm.

Figure 4—source data 1 Raw images of gels validating C. neoformans WT, ste3Δ and ste6Δ strains expressing the C. depauperatus pheromone.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/79114/elife-79114-fig4-data1-v2.zip
Download elife-79114-fig4-data1-v2.zip

If the hyphal growth observed in the C. neoformans strain expressing MFα_Cd is the result of a constitutively active pheromone response pathway, then we expected that deletion of the C. neoformans STE3a receptor should disrupt the heterologous pheromone response and inhibit hyphal growth. Indeed, deletion of the STE3a gene in KN99a crg1Δ MFα_Cd background completely abolished hyphal development (Figure 4B). Likewise, if the pheromone could no longer be exported from the cell, the positive feedback loop would be disrupted, which would similarly prevent hyphal growth. Consistent with this hypothesis, filamentation was no longer observed after deleting the pheromone exporter STE6 in the KN99a crg1Δ MFα_Cd strain (Figure 4B). Although the C. neoformans and C. depauperatus mature MFα protein sequences differ by two amino acids (Figure 2C), these results indicate that the C. depauperatus MFα pheromone can apparently undergo the same post-translational modifications and utilize the same machinery as the native C. neoformans pheromone to induce a mating response.

Mutants defective in critical mating and meiosis pathway components disrupt normal basidia formation and sporulation but not hyphal growth in C. depauperatus

In light of these results, we deemed likely that MFα pheromone production in C. depauperatus may itself activate an autocrine signaling response via activation of the endogenous Ste3a pheromone receptor. To provide direct evidence for this hypothesis, we sought to delete key genes in C. depauperatus involved in the pheromone response pathway (MFα and STE3a) and meiosis (DMC1), which had previously shown strong upregulation under sporulation conditions (Figure 3). However, few in-depth genetic studies had been performed in C. depauperatus, so there was no established transformation system for this species. We tested multiple transformation approaches (including biolistic transformation and electroporation), but only Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation (ATMT) proved to be capable of delivering plasmids conferring drug resistance into C. depauperatus. Successful transformation of C. depauperatus also required constructing drug-resistance cassettes, containing a drug-resistance gene optimized for use in Cryptococcus, flanked by the C. depauperatus actin (ACT1) promoter and the phosphoribosyl anthranilate isomerase (TRP1) terminator sequences (see ‘Materials and methods’ for details).

By employing ATMT in C. depauperatus, we first isolated transformants with ectopic integration of the gene conferring resistant to nourseothricin (NAT) (Figure 5—figure supplement 1). Notably, C. depauperatus was highly resistant to concentrations of nourseothricin that are typically used for Cryptococcus (100 µg/mL) and required three times as much drug (300 µg/mL) to observe growth inhibition. ATMT was subsequently applied to delete the MFα, STE3a, and DMC1 genes. We obtained a single deletion mutant for MFα, two independent STE3 deletion mutants, and one DMC1 deletion mutant, all in the CBS7841 background.

Following PCR confirmation of gene deletion, mutants were analyzed by light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy for phenotypic defects. C. depauperatus mfαΔ and ste3aΔ mutants displayed strikingly similar hyphal morphology, and defects in basidia maturation compared to wild-type CBS7841 (Figure 5). Notably, the two mutants showed a significant reduction in the frequency of basidia with spore chains (Figure 5B, Figure 5—source data 1) and exhibited unsporulated basidia in both actively growing and older hyphae that were significantly smaller compared to wild-type unsporulated basidia (Figure 5C, Figure 5—figure supplement 2, Figure 5—source data 2). Besides the defects in basidia maturation, apical branching (tip-slitting) was observed near the termini of single hyphal filaments in both mutants (Figure 5A); a phenotype that resembles that of Neurospora crassa actin mutants (Virag and Griffiths, 2004) and may as well reflect a defect in hyphal polarity. An mfαΔ ste3Δ double mutant isolated from progeny of mfαΔ x ste3Δ co-cultures (see next section) displayed similar defects as the single mutants (Figure 5B). Despite this, none of the mutants had complete impairment of hyphal formation, indicating that this process in C. depauperatus can occur independently of pheromone-receptor signaling.

Figure 5 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

C. *depauperatus mf*αΔ and *ste3*Δ mutants display defects in basidia maturation and sporulation, and the *dmc1*Δ mutant shows impaired sporulation despite achieving basidial maturation.

(A) Scanning electron microscopy images of wild-type CBS7841, mfαΔ (SEC831), *ste3*Δ (SEC836), and *dmc1*Δ (SEC866) deletion mutants. Cells were imaged following 1week of incubation on V8 medium at room temperature in the dark. Images were taken at ×3500 magnification; bars = 10μm. Arrows show examples of the tip splitting phenotype observed in mfαΔ and *ste3*Δ mutants. (B) Quantification of basidia-producing spores and basidia defective in sporulation. Strains were incubated on Murashige–Skoog (MS) medium for 10days. Up to 100 basidia were evaluated in each case across at least three independent images, and the percentage of basidia with spores (blue) and those defective in sporulation (i.e., bald basidia; orange) is represented. Single mutants (mfαΔ, *ste3*Δ, and *dmc1*Δ) were constructed via *A. tumefaciens*-mediated transformation, and the mfαΔ *ste3*Δ double mutant was isolated from progeny of mfαΔ × *ste3*Δ co-cultures (basidia #6 isolate number 1). Error bars represent standard error of the mean (see Figure 5—source data 1). (C) Box and whisker plots showing the diameter of sporulating and unsporulated basidia in wild-type and mutant strains. Strains were incubated on MS medium for 25days, imaged at ×12.5 magnification, and the basidial diameter was measured with ImageJ software (see Figure 5—figure supplement 2). Shaded boxes and black line represent the interquartile ranges and median value, respectively. Outliers are included (see Figure 5—source data 2). Statistical significance in panels (B) and (C) was determined with a one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test. *** Significant at p<0.0001; n.s., not significant.

Figure 5—source data 1 Frequency of basidia defective in sporulation (bald basidia) and basidia with spores in C. depauperatus wild-type (CBS7841) and mutant strains, and one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD post hoc statistical tests for frequencies of bald basidia.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/79114/elife-79114-fig5-data1-v2.pdf
Download elife-79114-fig5-data1-v2.pdf
Figure 5—source data 2 Diameter of unsporulated and sporulating basidia in C. depauperatus wild-type (CBS7841) and mutant strains (mfαΔ, ste3Δ, and dmc1Δ) following incubation on Murashige–Skoog (MS) medium for 25days at room temperature in the dark. Statistical tests for differences in basidial diameter (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc; when comparing two groups of observations, the results of Tukey’s HSD test are equivalent to Student’s t-test).: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/79114/elife-79114-fig5-data2-v2.xlsx
Download elife-79114-fig5-data2-v2.xlsx

Interestingly, a low percentage of the basidial population in the mfαΔ and ste3Δ mutants (<5.5% in the mfαΔ and <4.5% in the ste3Δ; Figure 5B and C) could, however, reach maturation and undergo sporulation. In such cases, the basidia diameter was not significantly different from wild-type sporulating basidia (Figure 5B and C). This residual sporulation could be the result of various compensatory processes, to be explored in future studies, including (i) constitutive basal activity of STE3a in the mfαΔ mutant; (ii) transgressive activation in the ste3aΔ mutant of other Ste3-like receptors such as Cpr2, which is known in C. deneoformans to compete with the Ste3 receptor for signaling and whose overexpression elicits unisexual reproduction (Hsueh et al., 2009); or (iii) other events such as aneuploidy. Together, our results indicate that disruption of STE3 or MFα severely affects basidial maturation in C. depauperatus and, consequently, has a strong impact in spore production.

Similarly, a complete sporulation defect phenotype was observed in the absence of DMC1 (Figure 5), although the dmc1Δ mutant produced hyphal structures with similar appearance to the wild-type, in contrast to the tip-splitting hyphal phenotypes of the pheromone and pheromone-receptor mutant strains. Additionally, the basidial diameter of the dmc1Δ mutant was not significantly different from wild-type unsporulated basidia (i.e., basidia observed in younger hyphae prior to sporulation; Figure 5C), indicating that the disruption of this meiotic essential gene does not impair basidial differentiation and maturation, similar to the findings previously reported for C. deneoformans (Liu et al., 2018). Overall, these findings provide additional evidence that C. depauperatus sexual reproduction is mediated via autocrine pheromone-receptor signaling and involves a meiotic cycle.

Exogenous pheromone stimulates sporulation of a C. depauperatus mutant lacking pheromone

We next sought to answer whether the phenotype of the mfαΔ pheromone-less mutant could be rescued when supplied with exogenous pheromone. To test this, we first attempted to stimulate sporulation in the mfαΔ mutant using a confrontation assay where wild-type and mutant strains were placed close together on a mating plate, but without contacting each other. However, we did not to observe any basidia with spores in the mutants across the gap in the confrontation assays (Figure 6—figure supplement 1). We hypothesized that this could be due to low diffusion and concentration of the lipid-modified mating pheromone and/or insufficient proximity between interacting cells. To circumvent this, we next co-cultured the mfαΔ strain with the ste3Δ deletion mutant (which still produces and secretes the mature α pheromone) and examined if the number of basidia with spore chains significantly increased compared to the residual numbers observed when both mutants were grown alone. Indeed, when the mfαΔ and ste3Δ mutants were cultured together, significantly more spores were observed than in either mutant (Figure 6A and B). This outcome could be the result of two scenarios: (i) mating (cell–cell fusion) had occurred between the two mutant strains, leading to complementation of mfαΔ or ste3Δ mutations by the corresponding wild-type alleles, or (ii) the pheromone secreted from the ste3Δ mutant was being bound by the active STE3 receptor in the mfαΔ mutant, rescuing the defect.

Figure 6 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Sporulation is partially restored in mfαΔ × *ste3*Δ co-cultures.

(A) Illustration and light microscopy images of the *C. depauperatus mf*αΔ mutant (left), *ste3*Δ mutant (right), and a co-culture of the mfαΔ and *ste3*Δ mutants (middle). Images were taken following 2weeks of incubation on Murashige–Skoog (MS) medium. White arrows indicate spore chains, and a zoomed-in view is shown in the inset. (B) Quantification of basidia-producing spores and basidia defective in sporulation in wild-type (CBS7841), mfαΔ and *ste3*Δ single mutants, and the mfαΔ × *ste3*Δ co-cultures. In each case, ~100 basidia across at least three independent images were quantified, and the percentage of basidia with spores (blue) and those defective in sporulation (i.e., bald basidia; orange) is shown. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Statistical significance was determined with a one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test. *Significant at p<0.05; ***significant at p<0.0001 (see Figure 6—source data 1). (C) Table summarizing genotypic analysis of basidiospores dissected from 12 independent basidia of the mfαΔ × *ste3*Δ cross. The germination rate of the dissected spores was 100%. Presence of wild-type MFα and *STE3* or mutant mfαΔ and *ste3*Δ alleles was determined by in-gene and junction PCRs. Each basidium was scored as parental ditype (PD), nonparental ditype (NPD), tetratype (TT), and uniparental (Uni.) based upon the genotype of parental and recombinant spores they comprised. Phenotypic and genotypic analyses of each dissected spore are available in Figure 6—source data 2. Illustrations in panel (A) were produced with https://biorender.com/.

Figure 6—source data 1 Frequency of basidia defective in sporulation (bald basidia) and basidia with spores in C. depauperatus wild-type (CBS7841), mfαΔ and ste3Δ single mutants, and the mfαΔ × ste3αΔ co-cultures mutant strains and one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD post hoc statistical tests for frequencies of sporulating basidia. Related to Figure 6B.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/79114/elife-79114-fig6-data1-v2.pdf
Download elife-79114-fig6-data1-v2.pdf
Figure 6—source data 2 Phenotyping and genotyping analyses of the progeny derived from mfαΔ × ste3Δ co-cultures. Related to Figure 6C. Progeny from each basidium were plated on YPD and YPD+ NATto test for NAT resistance or sensitivity and subjected to PCR and gel electrophoresis with primers targeting the wild-type MFα and STE3 alleles, as well as the 3′ junction of the mfαΔ::NAT and ste3Δ::NAT deletion loci. Phenotyping and genotyping observations were compiled to determine whether exogenous pheromone from the ste3Δ mutant may have stimulated sporulation of the mfαΔ mutant, or mating occurred between the mfαΔ and ste3Δ mutants. Each basidium was scored as parental ditype (PD), nonparental ditype (NPD), tetratype (TT), and uniparental (Uni.) based upon the genotype of parental and recombinant spores they comprised.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/79114/elife-79114-fig6-data2-v2.xlsx
Download elife-79114-fig6-data2-v2.xlsx

To find out which of these processes occurred, spores from single basidia were dissected, and PCR was used to determine whether wild-type or mutant MFα and STE3 alleles were present in the progeny. Upon the analysis of spores from 12 independent basidia, we found that both scenarios seemed to be occurring (Figure 6C). Most of the basidia analyzed (n = 8; basidia 2–6 and 9–11; ~67%) yielded progeny with different genotypes regarding the MFα and STE3 loci, implying that mating between the two mutant strains and meiosis had occurred. Analysis of three other basidia (basidia 7, 8, and 12; 25%) showed, however, that the progeny had the same genotype as the mfαΔ mutant parent (Figure 6C), indicating that exogenous pheromone from the ste3Δ mutant may have stimulated basidia maturation and sporulation of the mfαΔ mutant in trans. Lastly, spores recovered from basidia 1 were all ste3Δ. This progeny may have originated from one of those rare basidia that could reach maturation and undergo sporulation, which were observed in less than 2.6% of the basidia surveyed in the ste3Δ mutant across all experiments. Alternatively, it could be the outcome of a process analogous to pseudosexual reproduction recently characterized in C. neoformans, where one of the two parental nuclei is lost after mating, giving rise to uniparental progeny (Yadav et al., 2021).

C. depauperatus undergoes intra-strain, but not inter-strain, sexual reproduction

After establishing that C. depauperatus is engaging in a sexual cycle involving meiosis, we sought to isolate progeny following intra- or inter-strain genetic crosses of CBS7841 and CBS7855. First, we developed an assay to readily identify recombinant progeny by isolating C. depauperatus strains carrying mutations easily detectable by selection on drug-containing media. To accomplish this, strains CBS7841 and CBS7855 were subjected to exposure to compounds in which mutations in target genes would lead to resistance. Sensitivity to two drugs was observed: canavanine and 5-flucytosine (5-FC). Loss-of-function mutations in the CAN1 gene (encoding a plasma membrane arginine permease) confer resistance to canavanine, and loss-of-function mutations in any of five known genes (FUR1, FCY1, FCY2, UXS1, or TCO2) can confer resistance to 5-FC in C. deuterogattii and other fungi (Srb, 1956; Song et al., 2012; Billmyre et al., 2020). Two canavanine-resistant strains and one FUR1 (encoding an uracil phosphoribosyltransferase) mutant strain resistant to 5-FC were isolated in the CBS7841 background (can1-1, can1-2, and fur1-1), and one canavanine-resistant strain and one FUR1 mutant strain were isolated in the CBS7855 background (can1-3 and fur1-2) (Figure 7A and B). We note that these mutations both confer recessive drug resistance; thus, in crosses of can1 and fur1 mutants, this allows haploid meiotic F1 progeny to be selected by virtue of resistance to both drugs, whereas any diploid fusion products (can1/CAN1 FUR1/fur1) would be sensitive to both drugs as a result of complementation.

Figure 7 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Analysis of C. *depauperatus can1* and *fur1* mutants, and mating in intra- and inter-strain crosses.

Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of (A) *can1* and (B) *fur1* mutants. Top panels: wild-type and UV-induced *can1* mutants on YNB and YNB+ 60µg/mL canavanine (Can), and wild-type (WT) and spontaneous *fur1* mutants on YNB+ 100µg/mL 5-flucytosine (5-FC). Bottom panels: PCR and RFLP analyses of wild-type, and mutant *can1* and *fur1* alleles. The different *CAN1* and *FUR1* spontaneous mutations are depicted on the top of each gene (see ‘Materials and methods’ for details). (C) Schematic of mating assays with the *can1* and *fur1* mutants. (D) Mating assessment in CBS7841 and CBS7855 *can1* and *fur1* mutants when crossed with themselves (intra-strain crosses) and with each other (inter-strain crosses). For the inter-strain crosses, we assumed the possibility that the next isolate to be analyzed could be recombinant and thus the frequencies (shown in parentheses) were calculated as being<1/54 (*can1-2* × *fur1-2*) or<1/43 (*can1-3* × *fur1-1*).

Figure 7—source data 1 Source raw data for Figure 7A and B (raw images of gels).: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/79114/elife-79114-fig7-data1-v2.zip
Download elife-79114-fig7-data1-v2.zip

Next, we isolated double-drug-resistant progeny by co-culturing the can1 and fur1 mutants and selecting for progeny resistant to both canavanine and 5-FC. Intra-strain crosses (CBS7841 can1-2 × CBS7841 fur1-1 or CBS7855 can1-3 × CBS7855 fur1-2) and inter-strain crosses (CBS7841 can1-2 × CBS7855 fur1-2 or CBS7841 fur1-1 × CBS7855 can1-3) were co-cultured in non-selective conditions and cells/spores were then transferred to medium containing both drugs as illustrated in Figure 7C. We employed PCR amplification of the CAN1 and FUR1 genes paired with restriction enzyme digestion (PCR-RFLP) (Figure 7A and B) to determine whether wild-type, can1, or fur1 mutant alleles were present in the double-drug-resistant isolates. When PCR-RFLP analysis did not match the parental genotypes at both loci, the isolate was not scored as a progeny despite being double-drug resistant. Rather than cell fusion and meiosis generating the double can1 fur1 mutant resistant to both canavanine and 5-FC, Sanger sequencing revealed that in such cases a spontaneous mutation had arisen on the background of the already known can1 or fur1 parental mutations (Figure 7—figure supplement 1). Therefore, only resistant isolates that contained the parental can1 and fur1 mutant alleles upon validation by PCR-RFLP were scored as a recombinant progeny. Using this screening strategy, we could find double-drug-resistant isolates containing both can1 and fur1 mutant alleles in isolates resulting from intra-strain crosses of CBS7841 (can1-2 × fur1-1) and CBS7855 (can1-3 × fur1-2) (Figure 7D). In sharp contrast, none of the double-drug-resistant isolates resulting from inter-strain mating had both expected mutant parental alleles (Figure 7D), suggesting that some form of prezygotic (e.g., cell–cell fusion impairment) and/or postzygotic incompatibilities (e.g., the accumulation of genetic differences that could compromise meiosis) may already exist between the two strains.

Evidence of meiotic recombination along chromosome 3 in CBS7841

In both CBS7841 and CBS7855, the CAN1 and FUR1 genes reside on different chromosomes: CAN1 is on Chr 5 and FUR1 is on Chr 2 (Figure 8A). Therefore, the PCR-RFLP analysis of the double-drug-resistant isolates (Figure 7), as well as the analysis of the mfαΔ × ste3Δ progeny (Figure 6), only showed that following cell fusion, independent assortment of the chromosomes had taken place. To ascertain whether the exchange was a sexual or a parasexual event, we sought to assess whether recombination in the genome had occurred. If crosses between CBS7841 and CBS7855 had produced recombinant progeny, the number of SNPs throughout the genome accounting for the 2% divergence between the strains would have been sufficient to build high-resolution meiotic maps. However, no such progeny was isolated in our crosses.

Figure 8

Download asset Open asset

Meiotic mapping of UV-induced mutations in recombinant progeny.

(A) Chromosome locations of the *FUR1* and *CAN1* genes and the three new mutations induced by UV irradiation (UV1, UV2, and UV3). Two of the mutations (UV1 and UV2) are spaced~715kb apart on Chr 3. (B) Gene models carrying the UV1, UV2, and UV3 mutations in isolate SEC747. Exons are shown as gray rectangles, while the introns are shown as gray horizontal lines. The UV1, UV2, and UV3 mutations are single-nucleotide changes, respectively, within the seventh exon of the gene L203_103150, the last intron of gene L203_102842, and third exon of gene L203_105531, the latter mutation leading to an early stop-gain. (C) Results of PCR and Sanger sequencing analyses used to determine inheritance of wild-type and mutant alleles in 10 progeny from a cross between isolates SEC747 and SEC631. Wild-type and mutant alleles are colored green and purple, respectively. The parent genotypes of UV1, UV2, and UV3 loci are either all wild-type alleles (P1, isolate SEC631) or all mutant alleles (P2, isolate SEC747). All progeny analyzed inherited both parental *can1-2* and *fur1-1* mutant loci, providing a double-drug-resistant phenotype. 4 out of 10 progeny had combinations of wild-type and mutant alleles on Chr 3 that differ from either parent, suggesting that meiotic recombination occurred between the two markers.

As an alternative approach, we attempted to mutagenize the CBS7841 and CBS7855 can1 mutant strains to induce additional variants across the genome; the genetic marks could then be followed in progeny from intra-strain crosses to track recombination. However, the most mutations we could induce in a viable strain following UV mutagenesis were three nucleotide changes on the CBS7841 can1-2 background (strain SEC747). Coincidentally, two of these mutations were spaced ~715 kb apart on the long arm of Chr 3, and the other on Chr 7 (Figure 8A and B).

Though only two genetic markers on a chromosome are not sufficient to finely map recombination along the chromosome, we wanted to determine whether any level of meiotic recombination could be detected between these two loci. For this purpose, the CBS7841 can1-2 mutagenized strain (SEC747) was co-cultured with CBS7841 fur1-1 (SEC631), and 10 independent double-drug-resistant isolates were analyzed by PCR-RFLP of the CAN1 and FUR1 loci, and Sanger sequencing was employed to interrogate the loci of the other mutation sites on Chr 3 and 7. In accordance with their double-drug-resistant phenotype, all progeny analyzed inherited both can1-2 and fur1-1 mutant loci (Figure 8C). For the two UV-induced mutations on the long arm of Chr 3 (designated as UV1 and UV2 in Figure 8), 4 out of 10 progeny had recombinant genotypes, harboring only one of the two mutations (Figure 8C). For instance, progeny number 3 inherited the UV2 mutation from SEC747 and the wild-type allele at the UV1 locus, suggesting that at least one crossover has occurred between these two regions. Using the data from the recombinant progeny and location of mutant alleles on Chr 3, we calculated the genetic distance between the alleles as 17.88 kb/cM (Figure 8A). Although this is greater than the estimates in other Cryptococcus species, which vary between 4.69 and 13.2 kb/cM (Marra et al., 2004; Sun et al., 2014; Sun et al., 2017; Roth et al., 2018), our analysis only utilized two markers along the entirety of the chromosome and therefore genetic distances likely have been underestimated as multiple crossover events between distant markers may skew these results.

Discussion

Genetically controlled self-incompatibility systems are thought to have evolved to prevent inbreeding and promote outcrossing, but seeking a compatible mate is not always an easy task. This hurdle is particularly relevant for species with low population densities or that have spatially structured populations where dispersal between different patches is limited (Murtagh et al., 2000; Busch and Delph, 2012). Such a scenario of high-cost to mate finding has been proposed as an explanation for the emergence of reproductive mechanisms that overcome the low encounter rate, including hermaphroditism in many animals and plants, and homothallism in fungi, both systems allowing for reproductive assurance and the persistence of populations in a specific environment where mates are scarce or unavailable.

In this study, we present four lines of evidence that C. depauperatus is continuously undergoing sexual reproduction. The first evidence is the significantly increased expression of key mating and meiosis genes in conditions that promote sporulation. Second, the isolation of double-drug-resistant progeny from co-cultures of can1 and fur1 single-drug-resistant mutants showed exchange of genetic material occurred after co-incubation of marked parental strains. Third, we identified that this exchange of genetic material most likely involves mating, cell–cell fusion, karyogamy, and meiosis as demonstrated by the fact that sporulation, and thus the production of recombinant progeny, was severely impaired upon deletion of key components required for the pheromone signaling cascade (STE3) or completely abolished when deleting a meiotic-specific recombinase (DMC1). Fourth, we detected evidence of recombination on Chr 3 in CBS7841 upon analysis of the segregation patterns of UV-induced single-nucleotide variants. Taken together, these findings provide robust evidence of meiotic sexual reproduction, and we propose that C. depauperatus represents the first obligately sexual homothallic species to be identified in the Cryptococcus genus.

Although undergoing a meiotic cycle, our genomic analyses also revealed that two meiotic genes, MSH4 and MSH5, were lost in C. depauperatus while being retained in other Cryptococcus species. In S. cerevisiae, Msh4 and Msh5, along with other factors, repair most (~80%) of the double-strand breaks (DSBs) initiated by Spo11 as crossovers that show interference (a.k.a. class I crossovers) (de los de los Santos et al., 2003; Argueso et al., 2004). Thus, the loss of MSH4 and MSH5 in C. depauperatus, possibly along with loss of class I crossover formation and crossover interference, indicates that the crossover homeostasis machinery might not be completely intact in this species. If confirmed, such scenario may be analogous to the loss of Msh4 and Msh5 in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, along with class I crossover formation and crossover interference losses (Hollingsworth and Brill, 2004; Malik et al., 2007), or parallel the loss of class I crossovers via loss-of-function mutations in Msh4 and/or Msh5 in model species as diverse as S. cerevisiae, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Arabidopsis thaliana, where such events result in fewer crossovers, and those that remain are interference-independent (i.e., produced by a pathway involving instead the Mus81-Mms4/Eme1 protein complex) (Zalevsky et al., 1999; Kelly et al., 2000; Higgins et al., 2004; Hollingsworth and Brill, 2004).

Homothallism in fungi comes in many distinct forms. The simplest configuration is a single genome that encodes compatible sets of mating-type genes, either fused or unlinked (primary homothallism). Another strategy involves mating-type switching, either bidirectional or unidirectional, which leads to a mixed population of cells of opposite mating types that can mate. A third and the most recent form of homothallism to be described is unisexual reproduction where cells of the same mating type can undergo sexual reproduction despite having genes of only one mating type (reviewed in Ni et al., 2011; Roach et al., 2014; Fu et al., 2015; Wilson et al., 2015; Hanson and Wolfe, 2017; Wilson et al., 2021). Some other fungal species, referred to as pseudo-homothallic, can complete the sexual cycle without the apparent need for cell–cell fusion, but this is achieved by packaging two opposite mating-type nuclei derived from the same meiosis into the same cell (Lin and Heitman, 2007).

Our study reveals that homothallism in C. depauperatus is independent of the homeodomain transcription factors Sxi1/HD1 and Sxi2/HD2 as these genes are completely absent in the genomes of the two strains. Rather, it seems to be orchestrated by the expression in the same genome of a single interacting mating receptor (Ste3a)/pheromone ligand (MFα) pair that signals through a similar mating pathway characteristic of heterothallic Cryptococcus species. This is similar to findings from the ascomycete fungi Sordaria macrospora, N. crassa, and Trichoderma reesei, where one compatible pheromone/pheromone-receptor pair in mating partners seems to be necessary and sufficient for sexual development (Mayrhofer et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2012; Seibel et al., 2012).

Interestingly, despite a protein sequence that differs by two amino acids, introduction of the C. depauperatus MFα pheromone into a C. neoformans MATa strain induced robust hyphal formation, and this self-filamentous phenotype was abolished by deletion of either STE6 (encoding the pheromone exporter) or the STE3a gene (encoding the α-pheromone receptor). Likewise, deletion of the MFα and STE3a genes in C. depauperatus resulted in severe defects in basidia maturation and sporulation, but the C. depauperatus mfαΔ mutant, while unable to produce the pheromone itself, could sense the pheromone secreted from the ste3Δ mutant in a co-culture and sporulation was partially restored. Together, this indicates that the mechanisms for pheromone export and sensing between the two species are largely conserved and reveals that pheromone/receptor recognition can transcend species boundaries.

Intriguingly, the pheromone/receptor autocrine system of C. depauperatus seems to control the later stage of sexual development (basidia maturation), rather than hyphal development as it does during C. neoformans and C. deneoformans heterothallic mating. Indeed, we showed that the absence of the mating pheromone or the pheromone receptor did not result in obvious impairment of self-filamentation, except for an interference in hyphal polarity resulting in tip splitting. This is similar to previously described pheromone and receptor gene deletion mutants in the filamentous ascomycetes S. macrospora and Podospora anserina, as well as deletion of both receptor genes in Aspergillus nidulans, which cause no changes in hyphal growth (Seo et al., 2004; Coppin et al., 2005; Mayrhofer et al., 2006). Conversely, basidia maturation was severely impaired in C. depauperatus ste3Δ, mfαΔ, and ste3Δ mfαΔ mutants. While the reasons underlying such observations are presently unclear, it is important to note that some of the upstream components of the mating cascade critical for the paracrine induction of hyphal formation and dikaryon maintenance during heterothallic reproduction in C. neoformans and C. deneoformans (including MFα, Ste3, and Ste6) are seemingly bypassed in monokaryotic hyphal development and sporulation during unisexual reproduction in C. deneoformans (Gyawali et al., 2017; Tian et al., 2018). A reasonable explanation as to why the intercellular regulation mediated by pheromone is not strictly required for unisexual reproduction in C. deneoformans stems from the fact that the unisexual process in most cases occurs independently of cell–cell fusion, with cells transitioning to a diploid state either through cell fusion-independent karyogamy (minor route) or endoreplication (major route) (Fu and Heitman, 2017), and C. depauperatus may have adopted similar mechanisms.

Under this scenario, we posit that the loss of the homeodomain genes SXI1 and SXI2 in C. depauperatus may have enabled additional changes in the regulation of the mating pathway and some genes have possibly taken on additional regulatory roles downstream of the mating pheromone cascade, including in basidia maturation, meiosis, and sporulation. Two possible candidate genes that could have gained additional regulatory roles include homologs of Mat2, an HMG transcription factor, and Znf2, a zinc finger transcription factor, which are central components governing opposite and unisexual mating in C. deneoformans (Lin et al., 2010). However, we did not observe an upregulation of these genes under sporulation conditions. Hence, homothallism in C. depauperatus does not completely bypass the requirements for heterothallic sexual reproduction in that it requires the interplay between a compatible pheromone/receptor pair of opposite mating types. These findings show an interesting parallel with studies in A. nidulans that have also revealed that homothallism in this species does not bypass the requirements for partner signaling, but instead requires activation of the heterothallic signaling pathway for sexual development in a single individual (Paoletti et al., 2007). Future studies should address whether other aspects of the mating pathway have been rewired in C. depauperatus due to the loss of the homeodomain transcription factors.

Our genomic and phylogenetic analysis revealed that the predicted MAT locus structure of C. depauperatus has been extensively remodeled compared to other Cryptococcus species. While C. depauperatus has retained genes necessary for sexual reproduction, some of the key genes, including the MFα gene encoding the mating pheromone, are found outside of the predicted MAT region. In heterothallic basidiomycete fungi, one or more pheromone genes are invariably linked to a pheromone receptor of the same mating specificity (Coelho et al., 2017) and maintained in this way due to suppression of recombination, which in some fungal lineages has been established hundreds of millions of years ago (Devier et al., 2009). We hypothesize that the MAT gene cohort in C. depauperatus has been dramatically rearranged due to reduced selective pressure to maintain these genes in tight linkage, likely associated with the development of self-compatibility. Additionally, all Cryptococcus species so far examined encode multiple identical copies of the MFα or MFa pheromone genes per mating type to increase the production of the mating pheromone per cell, and this is thought to enhance the functionality of the poorly diffusible small lipophilic peptides (Akada et al., 1989). In contrast, the presence of a single MFα gene copy in the C. depauperatus genome indicates that selection has acted to reduce the energetic burden of having extra gene copies without a direct benefit. Indeed, intercompatible MFα and Ste3a proteins are readily produced by the same cell, and thus, as our confrontation assays between mfαΔ and ste3Δ mutants suggested, long-distance communication is unlikely to be favored. Nevertheless, this system still allows admixture of genetic diversity via outcrossing.

Elucidating the genomic regions conferring sexual identity across a phylogeny can be a powerful approach to studying the mating-type loci structure and associated transitions between different modes of reproduction. The MAT locus identified on Chr 4 in both strains contains genes associated with C. amylolentus P/R and HD loci reminiscent of a past fusion event between the two regions in C. depauperatus. This event could have occurred in the common ancestor giving rise to C. depauperatus and the Cryptococcus pathogenic complex, or evolved instead independently in the two lineages. Our analyses cannot exclude the possibility as well that the two genomic regions in C. depauperatus fused together via chromosomal translocation only after homothallism was attained. Although there are several possible models to explain how the observed configuration of canonical MAT locus genes could have evolved from either a bipolar or tetrapolar mating system, we present two that we consider the most parsimonious given the present data and analyses (Figure 9).

Figure 9

Download asset Open asset

Proposed models for the evolution of *MAT* and homothallism in C. *depauperatus.*

(A) Following cell fusion of two haploid cells with opposite mating types with linked *P/R* and HD loci (bipolar configuration), a self-filamentous diploid cell was formed. During meiosis, one set of homologous chromosomes, except that containing the *MAT* locus, was lost, resulting in an F1 aneuploid 1n + 1 progeny that is still self-fertile. The need for the HD genes is bypassed and the genes were eventually lost. As selective pressure to maintain genes in tight linkage at *MAT* was reduced due to self-compatibility, some genes from the *MAT*α loci became unlinked and dispersed throughout the genome via rearrangements and/or transposition. (B) Cells of opposite mating type carrying unlinked *P/R* and HD loci (tetrapolar configuration) fused to produce a self-filamentous diploid. During meiosis, a recombination event between *HD1* and *HD2* led to the formation of compatible *HD1*/*HD2* allele pairs whose gene products could heterodimerize and form an active transcriptional regulator. In a subsequent mating event involving one or both such individuals, a recombination event at the *P/R* locus caused reciprocal exchange between select *P/R a1* (including MFα) and *P/R a2* genes and gave rise to two haploid, self-filamentous progeny both now capable of responding to their own pheromone. In such a scenario, the cell harboring the *STE3*aand MFα genes may have subsequently lost the compatible *HD1/HD2* gene pair, and some *MAT*α genes became unlinked and dispersed throughout the genome. The cell harboring the *STE3*α and MFagenes was either lost or outcompeted. OG stands for other genes typically included at the *P/R* locus beyond mating pheromones and receptors.

Both models envision an ancestral state with two cells of the opposite mating-type fusing to produce a self-filamentous diploid. If the ancestor of C. depauperatus had a bipolar mating configuration (Figure 9A), then the diploid cell could have undergone a round of meiosis, resulting in an F1 aneuploid 1n + 1 progeny containing the genome of the MATa parent plus the MAT chromosome of the MATα parent. This progeny would be self-filamentous and potentially able to undergo a sexual cycle. If the ancestor had instead a tetrapolar mating configuration (Figure 9B), two intra-MAT recombination steps are required to achieve homothallism. First, a recombination event at the HD locus would bring together compatible HD1 and HD2 alleles, whose gene products could heterodimerize and form an active transcription regulator. The haploid individuals carrying this compatible HD pair would shift from compatibility determined by two sequential checkpoints (P/R and HD) to compatibility determined by a single mechanism (P/R), representing the first step in a transition from heterothallism to homothallism. A complete transition to homothallism could then be achieved in a subsequent mating event by uniting in the same genome-compatible pheromones and receptors via recombination; the isolates resulting from such event would respond to their own pheromone. In both models, we posit that the selective pressure to maintain an intact MAT locus is likely relaxed once self-compatibility is established, allowing chromosomal rearrangements to distribute some of the MAT genes throughout the genome without a concomitant fitness disadvantage. The SXI1/HD1 and SXI2/HD2 genes are eventually lost once their function is bypassed or supplanted by other genes.

The varied mechanisms via which homothallism has evolved and is maintained in fungi suggest that it represents an evolutionarily significant mating strategy. Examples from other fungi provide additional insights as to how the homothallic lifestyle of C. depauperatus evolved. While the number of representative samples is presently limiting, increased sampling efforts over a broader range of niches, including surveys for mycoparasites, may prove a good strategy to uncover additional isolates of the same or from closely related species, as a recent study suggests (Guterres et al., 2021). A careful characterization of the ability to sexually reproduce will ultimately shed light on how this unique continuously active sexual development program emerged, making it a contrasting Cryptococcus species. Hence, C. depauperatus provides another vantage point and an opportunity to further understand both the evolution of sexual reproduction in the pathogenic and saprobic Cryptococcus lineages, and the frequent transitions between modes of sexual reproduction that have occurred throughout the fungal kingdom.

Materials and methods

Strains, growth conditions, and primers

Request a detailed protocol

C. depauperatus strains were sub-cultured from –80°C onto V8 pH 5.0 (5% V8 juice, 0.05% w/v KH₂PO₄, 4% agar) or Murashige–Skoog (MS) medium plates, and maintained on V8 pH 5.0 medium at room temperature thereafter unless otherwise noted. C. neoformans strains were maintained on yeast, peptone, dextrose (YPD) and incubated at 30°C after subculturing from freezer stocks, and then stored at 4°C. Both C. depauperatus and C. neoformans strains are stored long term in 25% glycerol stocks at –80°C. All strains and primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary file 1 and Supplementary file 2, respectively.

DNA extraction, CHEF analysis, and whole-genome sequencing of C. depauperatus strains

Request a detailed protocol

To isolate genomic DNA, cells from CBS7841 and CBS7855 were scraped from V8 pH 5.0 plates and collected in a 50mL conical tube. Cells were frozen at –80°C for at least 1 hr and lyophilized overnight. Genomic DNA was extracted from the dried cell debris using a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) (Pitkin et al., 1996). To recover high-molecular-weight DNA samples, precipitated DNA was spooled out using a glass rod, and the size and integrity of the DNA were confirmed by clamped homogeneous electrical field (CHEF) electrophoresis. Whole-genome sequencing was performed with Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT). For Illumina sequencing, two libraries were constructed. A short-fragment library was prepared from 100ng of genomic DNA sheared to~250bp using a Covaris LE instrument and adapted for sequencing as previously described (Fisher et al., 2011). A 2.5kb jumping library was prepared using the 2-to-5-kb insert Illumina Mate-pair library prep kit (V2; Illumina). These libraries were sequenced at the Broad Institute Genomics Platform on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 system to generate paired 101-base reads. For nanopore sequencing, libraries of the two strains were barcoded and constructed as per the manufacturer’s instructions using the SQK-LSK109 and EXP-NBD103/EXP-NBD104 kits. DNA samples were pooled together and run for 48 hr in a single R9 flow cell (FLO-MN106) in a MinION system controlled by MinKNOW. Basecalling was performed with Guppy v3.3.3 GPU mode and the parameters "-c dna_r9.4.1_450bps_hac.cfg --min_qscore=7 --qscore_filtering". The resulting "PASS" reads were de-multiplexed with guppy_barcoder with parameters "--barcode_kits EXP-NBD104 --records_per_fastq 0 --trim_barcodes". CHEF electrophoresis analyses for separating individual chromosomes were carried out as previously described (Sun et al., 2017) using switching times of 120–260s for smaller chromosomes and 560–700s for larger chromosomes.

Genome assembly

Request a detailed protocol

The genomes of CBS7841 and CBS7855 were assembled from nanopore long-reads with Canu v1.8 (Koren et al., 2017) using default parameters and an estimated genome size of 16.5 Mb. Sequence accuracy of the draft assemblies was improved by correcting errors using Nanopolish v0.11.2 (https://github.com/jts/nanopolish, Simpson et al., 2019) and with five rounds of Pilon v1.22 polishing with the "--fix all" parameter (Walker et al., 2014) employing the Illumina reads mapped to the respective assemblies using BWA-MEM v0.7.17-r1188 (Li and Durbin, 2009). For each assembly, the corresponding Canu-corrected reads were aligned to the entire genome via minimap2 v2.9-r720 (Li, 2018) and read coverage profiles were visualized with the Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) v2.8.0 (Robinson et al., 2011) to identify large collapsed regions or mis-assemblies. Reads aligned to the CBS7841 genome revealed a region on the original contig3, corresponding to the predicted centromere, at roughly double the assembly mean depth of coverage. Viewing this region of double coverage in IGV revealed a specific contig position where nearly all reads were split-aligned, indicating missing sequence in the consensus. One ONT read that was not split-aligned showed an insertion "I" in IGV with length of 12,682 bp. Inspecting the alignments of additional ONT split-aligned reads confirmed the length and content of the missing consensus sequence. This 12,682 bp region was extracted from one of the corrected ONT reads and inserted into the original contig3 at the exact site of the split-aligned read consensus base. For CBS7855, detection of low read coverage approximately in the middle of the original contig1 was also suggestive of misassembly. In this case, the assembler had joined the end of a chromosome with the arm of another chromosome (i.e., generating a junction between a telomere and part of a centromere), most likely due to the repetitive nature of some of the centromeres and telomeres. To resolve this, two breaks were first generated on the original contig1 to remove an ~40 kb region that was duplicated at the end of the original contig8. Second, LRscaf v1.1.9 with parameters "-misl 5 -micl 1000" and SSPACE-long v1.1 with parameters "-l 5 -o 1000" were employed to scaffold the resulting contigs. Both programs produced identical results, joining the initial contig8 with one of the broken fragments of the initial contig1. Third, multiple rounds of sequence alignment were employed to repair the end of the remaining fragment of the initial contig1. After these steps, remapping of the Canu-corrected reads recovered a more uniform distribution across the genome, showing that the assembly is free from large structural errors. The resulting assemblies of CBS7841 and CBS7855 were subjected to a final polishing step with Nanopolish, and two rounds of Pilon as described above.

Gene prediction and annotation

Request a detailed protocol

To minimize the prediction of false-positive gene structures in repetitive and low-complexity regions, the genome assemblies were initially soft masked for repeats by RepeatMasker version open-4.0.7 using a custom repeat library consisting of known C. neoformans transposable elements (Goodwin and Poulter, 2001) and C. depauperatus elements identified de novo by RepeatModeler2 (https://github.com/Dfam-consortium/TETools; Flynn et al., 2020). Gene models were predicted with the BRAKER2 pipeline v2.1.5 (https://github.com/Gaius-Augustus/BRAKER; Bruna et al., 2021) run in ETP-mode with parameters "--etpmode --softmasking --fungus". In this running mode, BRAKER employs predicted protein sets of other species processed by ProtHint and RNA-seq data for training GeneMark-ETP (Buchfink et al., 2015; Bruna et al., 2020). We used as input the available protein sets of C. neoformans H99 (Janbon et al., 2014) and C. amylolentus CBS6039 (Sun et al., 2017) and RNA-seq data obtained from C. depauperatus grown in two different conditions (see below). RNA-seq data was preprocessed using Trim Galore v0.6.5 (https://github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore, Krueger, 2019) with default parameters except that reads shorter than 75 nt after quality or adapter trimming were discarded (parameters: "--paired --quality 20 --phred33 --length 75"). Splice read alignment was performed with STAR aligner v2.7.4a (Dobin et al., 2013) (specific parameters for indexing: "--genomeSAindexNbases 11"; specific parameters for aligning: "--alignIntronMin 10 --alignIntronMax 2000 --outSAMtype BAM SortedByCoordinate") and the resulting BAM files were input to the BRAKER pipeline. In this running mode of BRAKER, intron information present in both data sources was weighted as reliable evidence and enforced for gene prediction in both GeneMark-ETP and in AUGUSTUS. Gene predictions were further refined by removing spurious gene calls identified within the predicted centromeric regions and manually adding the short mating pheromone precursor gene. tRNAs were predicted using tRNAscan (Chan and Lowe, 2019) and rRNAs predicted using RNAmmer (Lagesen et al., 2007). Genes containing PFAM domains found in repetitive elements or overlapping tRNA/rRNA features were removed. Genes were named and numbered sequentially with "locus_tag" ids for CBS7841 and CBS7855 starting at L203_100001 and L204_100001, respectively, to distinguish from the gene calls previously deposited in GenBank for the two strains under the same "locus_tag" prefix. For the protein coding gene name assignment, we combined names from HMMER PFAM/TIGRFAM, Swissprot, and KEGG products. The completeness of the genome assemblies and gene predictions was evaluated with Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO, v4.0.6) based on the presence/absence of a set of predefined single-copy orthologs of other Tremellomycetes (tremellomycetes_odb10 dataset) (Kriventseva et al., 2019; Manni et al., 2021).

Ortholog identification and phylogenomic data matrix construction

Request a detailed protocol

To construct the phylogenomic data matrix, single-copy orthologs were identified across selected strains/species representing all major Cryptococcus lineages (C. neoformans H99, C. deneoformans JEC21, C. gattii WM276, C. amylolentus CBS6039 and CBS6273, C. floricola DSM27421, and C. wingfieldii CBS7118) and the outgroup K. mangrovensis (strains CBS8507 and CBS10435) using OrthoFinder v2.4 (Emms and Kelly, 2019), with parameters "-M msa -S diamond -I 1.5 -T iqtree". The amino acid sequences of 4074 single-copy orthologs shared among all species were individually aligned with MAFFT v7.390 (Katoh and Standley, 2013) with arguments --localpair --maxiterate 1000 and trimmed with TrimAl v1.4.rev22 (Capella-Gutiérrez et al., 2009) using the "-gappyout -keepheader" options.

Phylogenetic analyses and evaluation of topological support

Request a detailed protocol

Two different analytical methods were employed to infer the evolutionary relationships among the selected taxa: (i) concatenation with gene-based partitioning and (ii) gene-based coalescence. ML phylogenetic trees were built using IQ-TREE v2.1.2 (Minh et al., 2020b). For the first method, a directory containing the individual protein alignments was passed to IQ-TREE with the argument "-p", which automatically loads and concatenates all alignment files into a supermatrix for partition analysis and applies an edge-linked proportional partition model to accommodates different evolutionary rates between partitions. Best-fitting amino acid substitution models were determined for each partition with the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). The best-scoring ML concatenation-based ML tree was inferred using the parameters "--seed 12345 -B 1000 -alrt 1000 -T 12". Support of each internal branch was assessed using 1000 replicates of the Shimodaira–Hasegawa approximate likelihood ratio test (SH-aLRT) and ultrafast bootstrap (UFboot).

For the second method, individual ML gene trees were inferred for the set of 4074 single-copy orthologs with IQ-TREE but using instead the argument "-S", which instructs the program to perform model selection and tree inference separately for each alignment. A coalescent-based species phylogeny was then inferred with ASTRAL-MP v5.15.2 (Yin et al., 2019) using a file containing the set of 4074 individual ML gene trees and the option "-t 2" to obtain on each branch a full set of different measurements, including quartet support for the main (q1) and alternative topologies (q2 and q3). Contracting branches with low support in gene trees has been shown to improve accuracy of coalescent-based tree inference with ASTRAL (Zhang et al., 2017). Therefore, branches with bootstraps < 90% were contracted with Newick utilities v1.6 (Junier and Zdobnov, 2010) using the options " 'i & b ≤ 90' o", resulting in poorly supported bipartitions within each gene tree becoming collapsed into polytomies. The resulting file was then run through ASTRAL as above, and local posterior probability (LPP) support values were plotted in the final tree. The best tree topologies obtained by both methods were congruent.

To quantify genealogical concordance and topological support, we analyzed each bipartition in the reference ML phylogeny by measuring the gene concordance factor (gCF) and the site concordance factor (sCF) as implemented in IQ-TREE v2.1.2 (Minh et al., 2020a). For every branch of the species ML reference tree, gCF describes the fraction of single-gene trees that can recover a particular branch, and sCF is defined as the percentage of decisive sites of the alignment that support a given branch in the species tree. To evaluate this, the file containing all 4074 single-gene trees was input to IQ-TREE using the specific options "--gcf --scf 1000 -seed 132465".

For the phylogenetic analysis of selected genes found within the MAT locus of C. neoformans (Figure 2—figure supplement 1), amino acid sequences were retrieved for each species, aligned, and trimmed as above, and subsequently used to infer ML phylogenies in IQ-TREE. All phylogenetic trees were visualized with iTOL v5.6.3 (Letunic and Bork, 2021).

Whole-genome pairwise identity, analysis of genomic features, and synteny comparisons

Request a detailed protocol

The average pairwise identities between the two genomes were calculated using dnadiff (https://github.com/marbl/MUMmer3/blob/master/docs/dnadiff.README), which is a wrapper around NUCmer, included in the MUMmer package (Kurtz et al., 2004). Alignments were filtered with a delta filter using parameters '–1' to select 1-to-1 alignments, allowing for rearrangements and '-l 100' to select a minimal alignment length of 100 bases.

The genomic features depicted in the circos plots were determined as follows: (i) repetitive DNA content, including transposable elements, was analyzed with RepeatMasker version open-4.0.7 (using RepBase-20170127 and Dfam_Consensus-20170127) and identified de novo by RepeatModeler2 (https://github.com/Dfam-consortium/TETools, Rosen, 2022); (ii) centromeres were predicted on the basis of the detection of centromere-associated LTR elements previously reported in C. amylolentus (Tcen1 to Tcen6) (Sun et al., 2017) and C. neoformans (Tcn1 to Tcn6) (Janbon et al., 2014). Most of these elements mapped to the largest ORF-free region in each contig, which also coincided with regions with low/minimal transcription; (iii) the GC content was calculated in nonoverlapping 5 kb windows using a modified Perl script (gcSkew.pl; https://github.com/Geo-omics/scripts/blob/master/scripts/gcSkew, Michigan Geomicrobiology Lab, 2019) and plotted as the deviation from the genome average for each contig; (iv) rRNA genes (18S, 5.8S, 28S, and 5S) and tRNA genes were inferred and annotated using RNAmmer v1.2 and tRNAscan-SE v2.0, respectively; and (5) telomeric repeats were identified at the end of each contig and inspected genome-wide with EMBOSS fuzznuc (Rice et al., 2000) using a search pattern of 2 × TAAC(4,5), allowing for minor variation between the repeats.

Genomic synteny analyses between CBS7841 and CBS7855 were conducted with BLASTN, and the results were plotted using Circos v0.69–6 (Krzywinski et al., 2009). The Python application Easyfig v2.2.3 (Sullivan et al., 2011) was employed to produce linear synteny plots and the resulting figures were further edited for representation purposes in Adobe Illustrator.

Read mapping and variant calling

Request a detailed protocol

To detect variants in C. depauperatus strains that underwent UV irradiation, their genomes were subjected to Illumina paired-end sequencing on a HiSeq 4000 system. Paired-end reads of 151 bp were mapped to the respective reference genome with BWA-MEM v0.7.17-r1188 with default settings. Picard tools (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/) integrated in the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) v4.0.1.2 (DePristo et al., 2011) was used to sort the resulting files by coordinate, to fix read groups (modules: SORT_ORDER=coordinate; 'AddOrReplaceReadGroups') and to mark duplicates. Variant sites were identified with HaplotypeCaller from GATK using the haploid mode setting, and only high-confidence variants that passed a filtration step were retained (the "VariantFiltration" module used the following parameters: DP <20 ǁ QD <15.0 ǁ FS >60.0 ǁ MQ <55.0 ǁ SOR >4.0). The resulting files in the variant call format (VCF) were visually inspected with IGV v2.8.0. New variants detected in the mutant strains were used as markers to score recombination or independent assortment of chromosomes after meiosis.

Divergence plots

Request a detailed protocol

To investigate the occurrence of highly similar genomic regions (>5 kb) between the two C. depauperatus strains, Illumina reads generated for CBS7855 were aligned to the CBS7841 reference genome assembly with the methods described above. The resulting consensus genotype VCF file was converted to the FASTQ by limiting maximum depth to 200 to avoid overrepresented regions using "vcfutils vcf2fq -D 200" included in the BCFtools v1.7 package (https://github.com/samtools/bcftools/tree/develop/misc; Danecek, 2018). A FASTA file was then generated in which bases with quality values lower than 20 (equivalent to 99% accuracy) were soft-masked to lowercase ("seqtk seq -q 20") (https://github.com/lh3/seqtk; Li, 2022) and ambiguous bases were subsequently converted to an "N". Levels of divergence per site (k, with Jukes–Cantor correction) between the two strains were estimated with VariScan v.2.0.3 (Vilella et al., 2005) using a nonoverlapping sliding window of 5000 sites. The resulting data was plotted with pyGenomeTracks (Lopez-Delisle et al., 2021). Because highly divergent regions (particularly the centromeres) are challenging to align to a reference genome using short-read data, all divergence estimates should be regarded as minimum estimates.

RNA extraction and RNA-seq analysis

Request a detailed protocol

RNA was extracted from C. depauperatus strains CBS7841 and CBS7855 grown in liquid culture and from solid medium. For liquid cultures, spores were scraped from V8 pH 5.0 plates and transferred to YPD liquid medium in 250 mL flasks. Liquid cultures were incubated at room temperature for 5 days with agitation. Following incubation, cultures were filter-sterilized, and the mycelia collected on the filter was scrapped off and transferred to 50 mL conical tubes. For cells harvested from solid medium, spores and mycelia were scraped from 10 V8 pH 5.0 plates, in triplicate, that had been incubated face-up in the dark at room temperature for 5 days. A cellophane membrane was placed on the agar prior to inoculation to prevent mycelia from embedding in the agar and allowing them to be harvested. Spores and mycelia from the plates were transferred to 50 mL conical tubes. Approximately 4 mL of cell mass was collected for each strain in each condition, and the rest was discarded. The 50 mL conical tubes were placed at –80°C for at least 1 hr before being lyophilized. After lyophilization, the cells were pulverized to a fine powder with 3 mm glass beads and vortexing. 4 mL of Trizol (Thermo Fisher) was added to the cell powder along with 0.8 mL of chloroform, and the mixture was centrifuged. The aqueous phase was transferred to a new tube and mixed with 2 mL of isopropanol. Each sample was then divided among six QIAGEN RNeasy mini spin columns and purified according to kit instructions. Each tube was eluted with 50 μL of DNase-free water and, for every sample, combined into a single 1.5 mL tube. RNA was treated with Turbo DNase (Thermo Fisher) according to kit instructions.

RNA sequencing was performed by Genewiz, Inc using a strand-specific protocol that included poly-A selection. Sequencing was done on an Illumina HiSeq instrument using paired-end, 150 bp reads. Trimming of sequence reads was done as described before (Teichert et al., 2012), and reads were mapped to the genomic sequences using HISAT2 v2.1.1 (Kim et al., 2019). Transcript levels were compared using the algorithms implemented in DESeq2 v1.4.5 (which report p-values that indicate statistical significance; i.e., likelihoods that a gene is not differentially expressed) (Love et al., 2014) and in LOX (Levels Of eXpression) v1.8 (which reports Bayesian p-values for differential expression; i.e., likelihoods that a gene is differentially expressed) (Zhang et al., 2010).

Expression of C. depauperatus pheromone in C. neoformans

Request a detailed protocol

The C. depauperatus pheromone precursor encoding gene was amplified from CBS7841 using primers JOHE43884 and JOHE43885. Along with the actin (ACT1) promoter and terminator from C. neoformans H99 (amplified with primer pairs JOHE43888/JOHE43883 and JOHE43886/JOHE43889, respectively), the pheromone gene was cloned into pSDMA57, a C. neoformans complementation vector targeted for insertion into the safe haven locus on Chr 1 (Arras et al., 2015). BaeI-digested plasmid containing the cloned C. depauperatus MFα gene was introduced into C. neoformans strains YPH570 (MATa crg1Δ) and F99 (MATα crg1Δ) via biolistic transformation (Toffaletti et al., 1993). Transformants were selected on YPD agar medium supplemented with 200 μg/mL G418 (NEO) and confirmed by PCR using primers JOHE44478 to JOHE44481. Two independent transformants in each background were selected for further analysis.

We made C. neoformans ste3Δ and ste6Δ gene deletion mutants using the efficient homologous recombination system of S. cerevisiae (Ianiri et al., 2016). The upstream region of STE3 was amplified with primers JOHE45684 and JOHE45686, the HYG resistance gene was amplified from pJAF15 plasmid with JOHE45687 and JOHE45688, and the STE3 downstream region was amplified with JOHE45689 and JOHE45690. All PCR products were transformed into S. cerevisiae, along with XhoI and EcoRI digested pRS426 plasmid. Transformants were selected on synthetic dextrose without uracil (SD-ura). The full STE3 deletion construct was amplified from S. cerevisiae with primers JOHE45692 and JOHE45693 and introduced into C. neoformans via biolistic transformation. Transformants were selected on YPD agar medium supplemented with 200 μg/mL hygromycin (HYG), and replacement of the STE3 gene was confirmed with 5′ junction, 3′ junction, in-gene, and spanning PCRs. Similarly, to generate ste6Δ mutants, PCR products with primer pairs JOHE45700/JOHE45702 (STE6 upstream region), JOHE45703/JOHE45704 (HYG marker), and JOHE45705/JOHE45706 (STE6 downstream region) were transformed into S. cerevisiae along with XhoI and EcoRI digested pRS426 plasmid. The ste6Δ deletion construct was amplified from S. cerevisiae with primers JOHE45708 and JOHE45709 and introduced into C. neoformans via biolistic transformation. The ste6Δ deletion mutants were confirmed with 5′ junction, 3′ junction, in-gene, and spanning PCRs. All primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary file 2. To assess the ability of the transformants to filament, strains were inoculated onto filament agar for 2 weeks and incubated at room temperature in the dark. Images were taken with a Zeiss Axiocam 105 color camera attached to a Zeiss Scope.A1 microscope.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of C. depauperatus

Request a detailed protocol

Plasmids engineered for ectopic integration and gene deletion were generated using the efficient homologous recombination system of S. cerevisiae and the binary vector pGI3, which can be replicated in Escherichia coli, A. tumefaciens, and S. cerevisiae (Ianiri et al., 2016). The plasmid harboring the C. depauperatus-specific NAT resistance gene was constructed as follows. First, the promoter of the actin (ACT1) gene (L203_102772) was amplified from C. depauperatus CBS7841 with primers JOHE46155 and JOHE46156 (591 bp), the terminator of the phosphoribosyl anthranilate isomerase (TRP1) gene (L203_102914) was amplified using primers JOHE46165 and JOHE46168 (239 bp), and the NAT resistance gene was amplified from plasmid pAI3 using primers JOHE46159 and JOHE46162. Secondly, these PCR products, along with BamHI and KpnI digested pGI3, were transformed into S. cerevisiae and combined through homologous recombination, and transformants were selected for on SD-ura (Figure 5—figure supplement 1A). Transformants were screened by colony PCR using primer pairs JOHE43279/JOHE50308 (5′ junction) and JOHE50309/JOHE43280 (3′ junction). Genomic DNA was isolated from transformants correct for the 5′ and 3′ junction PCRs, and PCRs of the P_ACT1-NAT and NAT-T_TRP1 junctions were checked with primers JOHE50285/JOHE41081 and JOHE40162/JOHE50286, respectively. Genomic DNA from transformants correct at all junctions was electroporated into A. tumefaciens strain EHA105 and transformants were selected in YT + 50 μg/mL kanamycin, and further validated using colony PCR for the 5′ and 3′ junctions. For targeted gene replacement, regions flanking the target genes (MFα, STE3, and DMC1) were amplified by PCR using primers that include additional sequences specific to the pGI3 plasmid and NAT cassette for homologous recombination. The forward primer to amplify upstream gene regions also contained homology to the pGI3, whereas the reverse primer contained homology to NAT. Likewise, the forward primer to amplify downstream gene regions contain homology to NAT and the reverse primer contained homology to pGI3 (primers listed in Supplementary file 2).

The transconjugation experiments with C. depauperatus were performed by co-incubating A. tumefaciens strain EHA105 carrying the desired plasmid, prepared as previously described (Bundock et al., 1995), and adjusted to an OD₆₀₀ of 0.6 with CBS7841 C. depauperatus spores freshly isolated from V8 pH 5.0 or MS plates or CBS7855 spores germinated for 24 hr in YPD liquid medium, also adjusted to an OD₆₀₀ of 0.6 (Figure 5—figure supplement 1B). A. tumefaciens and C. depauperatus cells were aliquoted onto a nylon membrane placed on top of induction media (MM salts, 40 mM 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES), pH 5.3, 10 mM glucose, 0.5% w/v/ glycerol) containing 100 µM acetosyringone in four separate patches using varying ratios of fungal and bacterial cells: 100 μL of A. tumefaciens + 100 μL C. depauperatus, 100 μL of A. tumefaciens + 10 μL C. depauperatus, 10 μL of A. tumefaciens + 100 μL C. depauperatus, and 10 μL of A. tumefaciens + 10 μL C. depauperatus. Co-cultures of A. tumefaciens/C. depauperatus were incubated on induction medium agar for 3–10 days, after which all cells (bacterial and fungal) were scraped from the induction media and transferred to YPD medium supplemented with 200 μg/mL of cefotaxime to inhibit growth of A. tumefaciens, and 300 μg/mL of NAT to select C. depauperatus transformants. Plates were placed at 30°C until colonies appeared. Transformants with ectopic integration of the NAT cassette were screened using primers JOHE40162 and JOHE41081. Gene deletion transformants were screened at the 5′ and 3′ junctions, as well as in-gene and spanning PCRs with primers listed in Supplementary file 2.

Isolation of C. depauperatus mutants resistant to canavanine and 5-FC

Request a detailed protocol

To isolate canavanine-resistant mutants, spores from CBS7841 and CBS7855 were scraped from V8 pH 5.0 plates by pipetting 1 mL of dH₂O onto the cells and using a cell scraper to gently scrape spores off the plate. The spores were transferred to an YPD plate and irradiated with 10,000, 20,000, and 30,000 µJ/cm² UV with a Stratagene Stratalinker 2400. Spores were allowed to recover for 3 days before being scrapped from the YPD plate and transferred to YPD plates containing 60 µg/mL canavanine. The YPD + canavanine plates were incubated at room temperature in the dark until colonies appeared. Spores from the YPD + canavanine plates were scraped from single colonies using a toothpick and struck onto YPD + canavanine again to purify. Purified single colonies were transferred to V8 pH 5.0 plates to obtain more biomass for gDNA extraction. To isolate 5-FC-resistant mutants, spores from CBS7841 and CBS7855 were scraped from V8 pH 5.0 plates and transferred to YNB plates supplemented with 100 μg/mL of 5-FC and UV mutagenesis was not required in this case. Plates were incubated at room temperature until resistant single colonies appeared. Resistant colonies were purified on YNB + 5-FC, and purified single colonies transferred to V8 for gDNA isolation. gDNA was prepared by resuspending spores in 200 μL TENTS buffer (20 mM Tris pH 7.0, 2 mM EDTA, 500 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1% SDS) and adding 200 μL of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol 25:24:1. A volume of approximately 200 μL of glass beads was added and tubes were bead beated for 5 min. Following bead beating, 200 μL of Tris pH 7.0 was added, and the mixture was briefly vortexed. Tubes were spun in a microcentrifuge for 5 min at 15,000 rpm. The top aqueous phase was transferred to a clean 1.5 mL tube, and DNA was precipitated with 500 μL ethanol. DNA was pelleted in a microcentrifuge for 10 min, washed with 70% ethanol, dried, and resuspended in 50 μL dH₂O.

To determine the mutation, the CAN1 gene was amplified from canavanine-resistant isolates using primers JOHE45183 and JOHE45184. PCR products were run on an 0.8% agarose gel, purified, and sent for Sanger sequencing (Genewiz, Inc). Likewise, the FUR1 gene was amplified from 5-FC-resistant mutants using primers JOHE45642 and JOHE45653, purified, and sent for Sanger sequencing. Sequencher v5.4.6 was used to analyze gene sequences and identify mutations.

Co-culturing of C. depauperatus and genotypic analysis

Request a detailed protocol

The isolation of can1 fur1 recombinant strains was performed as illustrated in Figure 7C. Spores of the can1 and fur1 mutant strains were scraped from V8 pH 5.0 plates using 1 mL dH₂O and transferred to a sterile 1.5 mL tube. The final volume in the tube was brought up to 1 mL with dH₂O if needed. In a clean 1.5 mL tube, 500 μL of the spore suspension from the can1 mutant was combined with 500 μL of the spore suspension from the fur1 mutant, for a total volume of 1 mL. The spore mixture was spread across 10 individual V8 pH 5.0 plates (100 μL per plate) using 2 mm glass beads. Plates were incubated at room temperature in the dark for 7 days, after which spores were scraped and transferred to YNB plates containing 60 μg/mL canavanine and 100 μg/mL 5-FC, following incubation at room temperature until colonies appeared (approximately 3 weeks). A single double-drug-resistant colony from each plate was purified by streaking onto YNB + canavanine + 5-FC and then transferred to V8 pH 5.0 for gDNA isolation as described above.

To determine whether the double-drug-resistant isolates were recombinant, the CAN1 and FUR1 genes were interrogated by PCR and restriction digest to determine whether the mutant or wild-type allele was present. In CBS7841, the can1-2 mutant allele, selected for downstream experiments, and the wild-type CAN1 alleles were distinguished by PCR with wild-type and mutant-specific primers (primer pairs JOHE45891/JOHE45184 and JOHE45360/JOHE45184, respectively) each pair producing a 651 bp fragment (Figure 7A). For CBS7855, an 861 bp region of the CAN1 gene was first amplified with primer pair JOHE45183/JOHE45188 and then digested with SspI, which would not digest the wild-type CAN1 allele but would cleave the mutant can1-3 allele into two fragments (~560 and ~300 bp; Figure 7A). PCR and restriction enzyme digest was used to distinguish between the mutant and wild-type FUR1 alleles in both strains. First, a 1250 bp region of the FUR1 locus was amplified using primers JOHE45644 and JOHE45647 in wild-type and fur1 mutant strains. In CBS7481, restriction enzyme digest with HpyCHIII would cleave this PCR product into two visible fragments that are distinct between wild-type and fur1-1 mutant alleles (~600 and ~370 bp fragments in the wild-type;~600 and ~425 bp in the fur1-1 mutant; Figure 7A). In CBS7855, digestion of the 1250 bp fragment with PasI resulted in an undigested product for the fur1-2 mutant allele and in two fragments for the wild-type allele (~840 and ~410 bp in size; Figure 7A).

PCR-RFLP analysis of some of the double-drug-resistant isolates did not match the parental mutant genotypes at both CAN1 and FUR1 loci. The most likely explanation for such results is a spontaneous mutation in one gene arising on the background of the other mutation; for example, a spontaneous fur1 mutation on the CBS7855 can1-3 background would result in a double-drug-resistant strain with a restriction pattern at the CAN1 locus consistent with the can1-3 strain but exhibit a restriction pattern consistent with wild-type at the FUR1 locus. To validate this, 19 of the double-drug-resistant isolates that did not have both parental mutant alleles were Sanger-sequenced to determine what other mutation(s) on the background of the already known can1 or fur1 mutations could explain resistance to both drugs (Figure 7—figure supplement 1).

Meiotic recombination along Chr 3 in the progeny isolated from the SEC747 × SEC631 cross was determined by PCR amplification followed by Sanger sequencing to analyze whether a WT or a UV-induced mutation in genes L203_103150 (primer pairs JOHE51319/JOHE51320) and L203_103150 (primer pair JOHE50555/JOHE50556) had been inherited by the progeny.

Scanning electron microscopy

Request a detailed protocol

Scanning electron microscopy was performed at the North Carolina State University Center for Electron Microscopy, Raleigh, NC, USA. Agar blocks (~0.5 cm³) containing hyphae were excised and fixed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH = 6.8) containing 3% glutaraldehyde at 4°C for several weeks. The agar blocks were rinsed with cold 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer pH 6.8 three times and then dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol to reach 100% ethanol. The blocks were subjected to critical-point drying with liquid CO₂ (Tousimis Research Corp.) and sputter coated with 50 Å of gold/palladium using a Hummer 6.2 sputter coater (Anatech USA). The samples were viewed at 15 kV with a JSM 5900LV scanning electron microscope (JEOL) and captured with a Digital Scan Generator (JEOL) image acquisition system.

C. depauperatus confrontation assays

Request a detailed protocol

Using a toothpick, spores or hyphal cells were scraped from V8 pH 5.0 plates and struck onto MS plates in a straight line. A gap of approximately 2 mm was left between the two strains on the plate. Plates were incubated for 2 weeks in the dark at room temperature and photographed with a Zeiss Axiocam 105 color camera attached to a Zeiss Scope.A1 microscope.

Analysis of basidiospores derived from co-cultures of mfαΔ and ste3Δ mutants

Request a detailed protocol

Hyphae of mfαΔ (strain SEC831) and ste3Δ (strain SEC836) mutants were isolated from V8 pH 5.0 plates. 50 μL of each cell suspension was spotted onto MS medium either alone or together in one spot. After two weeks, spores from single basidia were microdissected onto YPD medium, and allowed to germinate. Cells from individual basidiospores were plated onto YPD and YPD + NAT, gDNA was extracted, and the MFα and STE3 genes were interrogated by PCR using the diagnostic primers listed in Supplementary file 2 for the corresponding gene or 3′ junctions of mfαΔ::NAT and ste3Δ::NAT deletion loci.

Data availability

Sequencing reads and genome assemblies of C depauperatus CBS7841 and CBS7855 were submitted to GenBank under BioProjects PRJNA200572 and PRJNA200573, respectively. All other genomic data (RNA-seq and Illumina sequence of C depauperatus CBS7841 can1 mutants) are available under BioProject PRJNA803141. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1 to 7.

The following data sets were generated

1. Broad Institute
(2016) NCBI BioProject
ID PRJNA200572. Cryptotoccus Sequencing.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov//bioproject/PRJNA200572
1. Broad Institute
(2016) NCBI BioProject
ID PRJNA200573. Cryptotoccus Sequencing.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA200573
1. Passer AR
2. Coelho MA
(2022) NCBI BioProject
ID PRJNA803141. Cryptococcus depauperatus raw sequence reads.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA803141

The following previously published data sets were used

1. Janbon G
(2012) NCBI BioProject
ID PRJNA411. Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii H99 genome.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA411/
1. Cuomo CA
(2016) NCBI BioProject
ID PRJNA200571. Cryptotoccus Sequencing.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA200571
1. Cuomo CA
(2016) NCBI BioProject
ID PRJNA191370. Cryptotoccus Sequencing.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA191370
1. Passer RA
2. Coelho MA
(2019) NCBI BioProject
ID PRJNA496466. Cryptococcus floricola strain DSM 27421 Genome sequencing and assembly.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA496466
1. Passer RA
2. Coelho MA
(2019) NCBI BioProject
ID PRJNA496468. Cryptococcus wingfieldii strain CBS7118 Genome sequencing and assembly.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA496468
1. Loftus BJ
(2005) NCBI BioProject
ID PRJNA13856. WGS sequencing of strain JEC21 (serotype D).

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA13856/
1. D'Souza CA
(2011) NCBI BioProject
ID PRJNA62089. Cryptococcus gattii WM276 RefSeq Genome.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA62089
1. Cuomo CA
(2013) NCBI BioProject
ID PRJNA352839. Kwoniella mangroviensis CBS 8507.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA352839
1. Cuomo CA
(2013) NCBI BioProject
ID PRJNA202099. Kwoniella mangroviensis CBS 10435.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA202099

References

1. Agrawal AF
2. Whitlock MC
(2012) Mutation Load: the fitness of individuals in populations where deleterious alleles are abundant
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 43:115–135.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160257
- Google Scholar
1. Akada R
2. Minomi K
3. Kai J
4. Yamashita I
5. Miyakawa T
6. Fukui S
(1989) Multiple genes coding for precursors of rhodotorucine A, a farnesyl peptide mating pheromone of the basidiomycetous yeast Rhodosporidium toruloides
Molecular and Cellular Biology 9:3491–3498.
https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.9.8.3491-3498.1989
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2009) Homothallic and heterothallic mating in the opportunistic pathogen Candida albicans
Nature 460:890–893.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08252
- Google Scholar
1. Argueso JL
2. Wanat J
3. Gemici Z
4. Alani E
(2004) Competing crossover pathways act during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Genetics 168:1805–1816.
https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.032912
- Google Scholar
1. Arras SDM
2. Chitty JL
3. Blake KL
4. Schulz BL
5. Fraser JA
(2015) A genomic safe haven for mutant complementation in Cryptococcus neoformans
PLOS ONE 10:e0122916.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122916
- Google Scholar
Book
1. Begerow D
2. Kemler M
3. Feige A
4. Yurkov A
(2017) Parasitism in Yeasts
In: Buzzini P, editors. In Yeasts in Natural Ecosystems: Ecology. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 179–210.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61575-2_7
- Google Scholar
1. Bennett RJ
2. Turgeon BG
(2016) Fungal Sex: the Ascomycota
Microbiology Spectrum 4:0005-2016.
https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0005-2016
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2012) Sex, outcrossing and mating types: unsolved questions in fungi and beyond
Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25:1020–1038.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02495.x
- Google Scholar
(2020) 5-fluorocytosine resistance is associated with hypermutation and alterations in capsule biosynthesis in Cryptococcus
Nature Communications 11:127.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13890-z
- Google Scholar
1. Bishop DK
2. Park D
3. Xu L
4. Kleckner N
(1992) DMC1: A meiosis-specific yeast homolog of E. coli recA required for recombination, synaptonemal complex formation, and cell cycle progression
Cell 69:439–456.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(92)90446-j
- Google Scholar
(2017) Evolutionary strata on young mating-type chromosomes despite the lack of sexual antagonism
PNAS 114:7067–7072.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701658114
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2018) Multiple convergent supergene evolution events in mating-type chromosomes
Nature Communications 9:2000.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04380-9
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2020) GeneMark-EP+: eukaryotic gene prediction with self-training in the space of genes and proteins
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics 2:lqaa026.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqaa026
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Bruna T
2. Hoff KJ
3. Lomsadze A
4. Stanke M
5. Borodovsky M
(2021) BRAKER2: automatic eukaryotic genome annotation with GeneMark-EP+ and AUGUSTUS supported by a protein database
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics 3:lqaa108.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqaa108
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2015) Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND
Nature Methods 12:59–60.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3176
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1995) Trans-kingdom T-DNA transfer from Agrobacterium tumefaciens to Saccharomyces cerevisiae
The EMBO Journal 14:3206–3214.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07323.x
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Buonomo SB
2. Clyne RK
3. Fuchs J
4. Loidl J
5. Uhlmann F
6. Nasmyth K
(2000) Disjunction of homologous chromosomes in meiosis I depends on proteolytic cleavage of the meiotic cohesin Rec8 by separin
Cell 103:387–398.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00131-8
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Busch JW
2. Delph LF
(2012) The relative importance of reproductive assurance and automatic selection as hypotheses for the evolution of self-fertilization
Annals of Botany 109:553–562.
https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr219
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2021) Multiple pathways to homothallism in closely related yeast lineages in the Basidiomycota
mBio 12:e03130.
https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.03130-20
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2009) trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses
Bioinformatics 25:1972–1973.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Chan PP
2. Lowe TM
(2019) tRNAscan-SE: Searching for tRNA Genes in Genomic Sequences
Methods in Molecular Biology 1962:1–14.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_1
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Coelho MA
2. Bakkeren G
3. Sun S
4. Hood ME
5. Giraud T
(2017) Fungal Sex: the Basidiomycota
Microbiology Spectrum 5:e0046-2016.
https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0046-2016
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2005) The function of the coding sequences for the putative pheromone precursors in Podospora anserina is restricted to fertilization
Eukaryotic Cell 4:407–420.
https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.4.2.407-420.2005
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Software
1. Danecek P
(2018) bcftools/misc, version 1.7
GitHub.

https://github.com/samtools/bcftools/tree/develop/misc
(2016) Genetic dissection of sexual reproduction in a primary homothallic basidiomycete
PLOS Genetics 12:e1006110.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006110
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2000) Characterization of the MFα pheromone of the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans
Molecular Microbiology 38:1017–1026.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02213.x
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2003) The Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease acts independently of double-Holliday junction resolution to promote a distinct subset of crossovers during meiosis in budding yeast
Genetics 164:81–94.
https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/164.1.81
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. DePristo MA
2. Banks E
3. Poplin R
4. Garimella KV
5. Maguire JR
6. Hartl C
7. Philippakis AA
8. del Angel G
9. Rivas MA
10. Hanna M
11. McKenna A
12. Fennell TJ
13. Kernytsky AM
14. Sivachenko AY
15. Cibulskis K
16. Gabriel SB
17. Altshuler D
18. Daly MJ
(2011) A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data
Nature Genetics 43:491–498.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.806
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Devier B
2. Aguileta G
3. Hood ME
4. Giraud T
(2009) Ancient trans-specific polymorphism at pheromone receptor genes in basidiomycetes
Genetics 181:209–223.
https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.108.093708
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Dobin A
2. Davis CA
3. Schlesinger F
4. Drenkow J
5. Zaleski C
6. Jha S
7. Batut P
8. Chaisson M
9. Gingeras TR
(2013) STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Bioinformatics 29:15–21.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. D’Souza CA
2. Kronstad JW
3. Taylor G
4. Warren R
5. Yuen M
6. Hu G
7. Jung WH
8. Sham A
9. Kidd SE
10. Tangen K
11. Lee N
12. Zeilmaker T
13. Sawkins J
14. McVicker G
15. Shah S
16. Gnerre S
17. Griggs A
18. Zeng Q
19. Bartlett K
20. Li W
21. Wang X
22. Heitman J
23. Stajich JE
24. Fraser JA
25. Meyer W
26. Carter D
27. Schein J
28. Krzywinski M
29. Kwon-Chung KJ
30. Varma A
31. Wang J
32. Brunham R
33. Fyfe M
34. Ouellette BFF
35. Siddiqui A
36. Marra M
37. Jones S
38. Holt R
39. Birren BW
40. Galagan JE
41. Cuomo CA
(2011) Genome variation in Cryptococcus gattii, an emerging pathogen of immunocompetent hosts
mBio 2:e00342.
https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00342-10
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Emms DM
2. Kelly S
(2019) OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics
Genome Biology 20:238.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y
- Google Scholar
1. Epinat G
2. Lenormand T
(2009) The evolution of assortative mating and selfing with in- and outbreeding depression
Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution 63:2047–2060.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00700.x
- Google Scholar
1. Farrer RA
2. Desjardins CA
3. Sakthikumar S
4. Gujja S
5. Saif S
6. Zeng Q
7. Chen Y
8. Voelz K
9. Heitman J
10. May RC
11. Fisher MC
12. Cuomo CA
(2015) Genome evolution and innovation across the four major lineages of Cryptococcus gattii
mBio 6:e00868.
https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00868-15
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Farrer RA
2. Chang M
3. Davis MJ
4. van Dorp L
5. Yang DH
6. Shea T
7. Sewell TR
8. Meyer W
9. Balloux F
10. Edwards HM
11. Chanda D
12. Kwenda G
13. Vanhove M
14. Chang YC
15. Cuomo CA
16. Fisher MC
17. Kwon-Chung KJ
(2019) A new lineage of Cryptococcus gattii (VGV) discovered in the Central Zambezian Miombo Woodlands
mBio 10:e02306.
https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02306-19
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Feretzaki M
2. Heitman J
(2013) Genetic circuits that govern bisexual and unisexual reproduction in Cryptococcus neoformans
PLOS Genetics 9:e1003688.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003688
- Google Scholar
(2009) Phylogeny and phenotypic characterization of pathogenic Cryptococcus species and closely related saprobic taxa in the Tremellales
Eukaryot Cell 8:353–361.
https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.00373-08
- Google Scholar
1. Fisher S
2. Barry A
3. Abreu J
4. Minie B
5. Nolan J
6. Delorey TM
7. Young G
8. Fennell TJ
9. Allen A
10. Ambrogio L
(2011) A scalable, fully automated process for construction of sequence-ready human exome targeted capture libraries
Genome Biology 12:R1.
https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-1-r1
- Google Scholar
1. Flynn JM
2. Hubley R
3. Goubert C
4. Rosen J
5. Clark AG
6. Feschotte C
7. Smit AF
(2020) RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families
PNAS 117:9451–9457.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921046117
- Google Scholar
(2003) Recapitulation of the sexual cycle of the primary fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii: implications for an outbreak on Vancouver Island, Canada
Eukaryot Cell 2:1036–1045.
https://doi.org/10.1128/ec.2.5.1036-1045.2003
- Google Scholar
1. Fraser JA
2. Diezmann S
3. Subaran RL
4. Allen A
5. Lengeler KB
6. Dietrich FS
7. Heitman J
(2004) Convergent evolution of chromosomal sex-determining regions in the animal and fungal kingdoms
PLOS Biology 2:e384.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020384
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Fu C
2. Sun S
3. Billmyre RB
4. Roach KC
5. Heitman J
(2015) Unisexual versus bisexual mating in Cryptococcus neoformans: consequences and biological impacts
Fungal Genetics and Biology: FG & B 78:65–75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2014.08.008
- Google Scholar
1. Fu C
2. Heitman J
(2017) PRM1 and KAR5 function in cell-cell fusion and karyogamy to drive distinct bisexual and unisexual cycles in the Cryptococcus pathogenic species complex
PLOS Genetics 13:e1007113.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007113
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Ginns J
2. Bernicchia A
(2000) Filobasidiella lutea: parasitism of Hypochnicium vellereum
Karstenia 40:49–51.
https://doi.org/10.29203/ka.2000.351
- Google Scholar
1. Ginns J
2. Malloch DW
(2003) Filobasidiella depauperata (Tremellales): haustorial branches and parasitism of Verticillium lecanii
Mycological Progress 2:137–140.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-006-0051-6
- Google Scholar
(2012) Unidirectional evolutionary transitions in fungal mating systems and the role of transposable elements
Molecular Biology and Evolution 29:3215–3226.
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss132
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Goodenough U
2. Heitman J
(2014) Origins of eukaryotic sexual reproduction
Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 6:a016154.
https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a016154
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Goodwin TJD
2. Poulter RTM
(2001) The diversity of retrotransposons in the yeast Cryptococcus neoformans
Yeast 18:865–880.
https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.733
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2021) Application of an optimized annotation pipeline to the Cryptococcus deuterogattii genome reveals dynamic primary metabolic gene clusters and genomic impact of RNAi loss
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 11:jkaa070.
https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkaa070
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2021) Cryptococcus depauperatus, a close relative of the human-pathogen C. neoformans, associated with coffee leaf rust (Hemileia vastatrix) in Cameroon
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 52:2205–2214.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-021-00592-2
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Gyawali R
2. Zhao Y
3. Lin J
4. Fan Y
5. Xu X
6. Upadhyay S
7. Lin X
(2017) Pheromone independent unisexual development in Cryptococcus neoformans
PLOS Genetics 13:e1006772.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006772
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Hagen F
2. Khayhan K
3. Theelen B
4. Kolecka A
5. Polacheck I
6. Sionov E
7. Falk R
8. Parnmen S
9. Lumbsch HT
10. Boekhout T
(2015) Recognition of seven species in the Cryptococcus gattii/Cryptococcus neoformans species complex
Fungal Genetics and Biology 78:16–48.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2015.02.009
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Hanson SJ
2. Wolfe KH
(2017) An evolutionary perspective on yeast mating-type switching
Genetics 206:9–32.
https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.117.202036
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Hauser PM
(2021) Pneumocystis mating-type locus and sexual cycle during infection
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 85:e0000921.
https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00009-21
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Heitman J
(2010) Evolution of eukaryotic microbial pathogens via covert sexual reproduction
Cell Host & Microbe 8:86–99.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2010.06.011
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Heitman J
(2015) Evolution of sexual reproduction: a view from the Fungal Kingdom supports an evolutionary epoch with sex before sexes
Fungal Biology Reviews 29:108–117.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2015.08.002
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2004) The Arabidopsis MutS homolog AtMSH4 functions at an early step in recombination: evidence for two classes of recombination in Arabidopsis
Genes & Development 18:2557–2570.
https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.317504
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Book
1. Hoekstra RF
(1987) The evolution of sexes
In: Stearns SC, editors. The Evolution of Sex and Its Consequences. Experientia Supplementum. pp. 59–91.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-6273-8_3
- Google Scholar
1. Hollingsworth NM
2. Brill SJ
(2004) The Mus81 solution to resolution: generating meiotic crossovers without Holliday junctions
Genes & Development 18:117–125.
https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1165904
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Hsueh YP
2. Shen WC
(2005) A homolog of Ste6, the a-factor transporter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is required for mating but not for monokaryotic fruiting in Cryptococcus neoformans
Eukaryotic Cell 4:147–155.
https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.4.1.147-155.2005
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Hsueh YP
2. Xue C
3. Heitman J
(2009) A constitutively active GPCR governs morphogenic transitions in Cryptococcus neoformans
The EMBO Journal 28:1220–1233.
https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.68
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2005) Sex-specific homeodomain proteins Sxi1α and Sxi2a coordinately regulate sexual development in Cryptococcus neoformans
Eukaryot Cell 4:526–535.
https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.4.3.526-535.2005
- Google Scholar
(2016) Gene function analysis in the ubiquitous human commensal and pathogen Malassezia genus
MBio 7:e01853.
https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01853-16
- Google Scholar
1. Ianiri G
2. Fang YF
3. Dahlmann TA
4. Clancey SA
5. Janbon G
6. Kuck U
7. Heitman J
(2020) Mating-type-specific ribosomal proteins control aspects of sexual reproduction in Cryptococcus neoformans
Genetics 214:635–649.
https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.119.302740
- Google Scholar
1. Janbon G
2. Ormerod KL
3. Paulet D
4. Byrnes EJ
5. Yadav V
6. Chatterjee G
7. Mullapudi N
8. Hon CC
9. Billmyre RB
10. Brunel F
11. Bahn YS
12. Chen W
13. Chen Y
14. Chow EWL
15. Coppée JY
16. Floyd-Averette A
17. Gaillardin C
18. Gerik KJ
19. Goldberg J
20. Gonzalez-Hilarion S
21. Gujja S
22. Hamlin JL
23. Hsueh YP
24. Ianiri G
25. Jones S
26. Kodira CD
27. Kozubowski L
28. Lam W
29. Marra M
30. Mesner LD
31. Mieczkowski PA
32. Moyrand F
33. Nielsen K
34. Proux C
35. Rossignol T
36. Schein JE
37. Sun S
38. Wollschlaeger C
39. Wood IA
40. Zeng Q
41. Neuvéglise C
42. Newlon CS
43. Perfect JR
44. Lodge JK
45. Idnurm A
46. Stajich JE
47. Kronstad JW
48. Sanyal K
49. Heitman J
50. Fraser JA
51. Cuomo CA
52. Dietrich FS
(2014) Analysis of the genome and transcriptome of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii reveals complex RNA expression and microevolution leading to virulence attenuation
PLOS Genetics 10:e1004261.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004261
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Jarne P
2. Charlesworth D
(1993) The evolution of the selfing rate in functionally hermaphrodite plants and animals
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24:441–466.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.002301
- Google Scholar
1. Jung KW
2. Yang DH
3. Maeng S
4. Lee KT
5. So YS
6. Hong J
7. Choi J
8. Byun HJ
9. Kim H
10. Bang S
11. Song MH
12. Lee JW
13. Kim MS
14. Kim SY
15. Ji JH
16. Park G
17. Kwon H
18. Cha S
19. Meyers GL
20. Wang LL
21. Jang J
22. Janbon G
23. Adedoyin G
24. Kim T
25. Averette AK
26. Heitman J
27. Cheong E
28. Lee YH
29. Lee YW
30. Bahn YS
(2015) Systematic functional profiling of transcription factor networks in Cryptococcus neoformans
Nature Communications 6:6757.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7757
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Junier T
2. Zdobnov EM
(2010) The Newick utilities: high-throughput phylogenetic tree processing in the UNIX shell
Bioinformatics 26:1669–1670.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq243
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Katoh K
2. Standley DM
(2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability
Molecular Biology and Evolution 30:772–780.
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2000) Caenorhabditis elegans msh-5 is required for both normal and radiation-induced meiotic crossing over but not for completion of meiosis
Genetics 156:617–630.
https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/156.2.617
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Kim H
2. Wright SJ
3. Park G
4. Ouyang S
5. Krystofova S
6. Borkovich KA
(2012) Roles for receptors, pheromones, G proteins, and mating type genes during sexual reproduction in Neurospora crassa
Genetics 190:1389–1404.
https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.136358
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Kim D
2. Paggi JM
3. Park C
4. Bennett C
5. Salzberg SL
(2019) Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype
Nature Biotechnology 37:907–915.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Koren S
2. Walenz BP
3. Berlin K
4. Miller JR
5. Bergman NH
6. Phillippy AM
(2017) Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation
Genome Research 27:722–736.
https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.215087.116
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Krassowski T
2. Kominek J
3. Shen XX
4. Opulente DA
5. Zhou X
6. Rokas A
7. Hittinger CT
8. Wolfe KH
(2019) Multiple reinventions of mating-type switching during budding yeast evolution
Current Biology 29:2555–2562.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.056
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2019) OrthoDB v10: sampling the diversity of animal, plant, fungal, protist, bacterial and viral genomes for evolutionary and functional annotations of orthologs
Nucleic Acids Research 47:D807–D811.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1053
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Software
1. Krueger K
(2019) TrimGalore, version 0.6.5
GitHub.

https://github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore
1. Krzywinski M
2. Schein J
3. Birol I
4. Connors J
5. Gascoyne R
6. Horsman D
7. Jones SJ
8. Marra MA
(2009) Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics
Genome Research 19:1639–1645.
https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.092759.109
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Kubátová A
(1992)
New records of micromycetes from Czechoslovakia. II. Filobasidiella depauperata (Petch) Samson, Stalpers et Weijman

Ceska Mykologie 46:126–130.
- Google Scholar
Book
(2011) Mating type in basidiomycetes: unipolar, bipolar, and tetrapolar patterns of sexuality
In: Pöggeler S, Wöstemeyer J, editors. Evolution of Fungi and Fungal-like Organisms. Springer. pp. 97–160.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19974-5_6
- Google Scholar
1. Kurtz S
2. Phillippy A
3. Delcher AL
4. Smoot M
5. Shumway M
6. Antonescu C
7. Salzberg SL
(2004) Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes
Genome Biology 5:R12.
https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12
- Google Scholar
1. Kwon-Chung KJ
(1975) A new genus, Filobasidiella, the perfect state of Cryptococcus neoformans
Mycologia 67:1197–1200.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1975.12019866
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Kwon-Chung KJ
(1976a)
A new species of Filobasidiella, the sexual state of Cryptococcus neoformans B and C serotypes

Mycologia 68:943–946.
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Kwon-Chung KJ
(1976b)
Morphogenesis of Filobasidiella neoformans, the sexual state of Cryptococcus neoformans

Mycologia 68:821–833.
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Kwon-Chung KJ
2. Chang YC
3. Bauer R
4. Swan EC
5. Taylor JW
(1995)
The characteristics that differentiate Filobasidiella depauperata from Filobasidiella neoformans

Studies in Mycology 38:67–79.
- Google Scholar
(2007) RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes
Nucleic Acids Research 35:3100–3108.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm160
- Google Scholar
1. Lee SC
2. Idnurm A
(2017) Fungal Sex: the Mucoromycota
Microbiology Spectrum 5:e0041-2017.
https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0041-2017
- Google Scholar
1. Lengeler KB
2. Fox DS
3. Fraser JA
4. Allen A
5. Forrester K
6. Dietrich FS
7. Heitman J
(2002) Mating-type locus of Cryptococcus neoformans: a step in the evolution of sex chromosomes
Eukaryotic Cell 1:704–718.
https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.1.5.704-718.2002
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Letunic I
2. Bork P
(2021) Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation
Nucleic Acids Research 49:W293–W296.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab301
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Li H
2. Durbin R
(2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
Bioinformatics 25:1754–1760.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Li H
(2018) Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences
Bioinformatics 34:3094–3100.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Software
1. Li H
(2022) Seqtk
GitHub.

https://github.com/lh3/seqtk
1. Lin X
2. Hull CM
3. Heitman J
(2005) Sexual reproduction between partners of the same mating type in Cryptococcus neoformans
Nature 434:1017–1021.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03448
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Book
1. Lin X
2. Heitman J
(2007) Mechanisms of homothallism in Fungi and transitions between heterothallism and homothallism
In: Heitman J, editors. Sex in Fungi: Molecular Determination and Evolutionary Implications. Washington D.C: ASM Press. pp. 35–57.
https://doi.org/10.1128/9781555815837.ch3
- Google Scholar
1. Lin X
(2009) Cryptococcus neoformans: morphogenesis, infection, and evolution
Infection, Genetics, and Evolution 9:401–416.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2009.01.013
- Google Scholar
1. Lin X
2. Jackson JC
3. Feretzaki M
4. Xue C
5. Heitman J
(2010) Transcription factors Mat2 and Znf2 operate cellular circuits orchestrating opposite- and same-sex mating in Cryptococcus neoformans
PLOS Genetics 6:e1000953.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000953
- Google Scholar
1. Liu XZ
2. Wang QM
3. Göker M
4. Groenewald M
5. Kachalkin AV
6. Lumbsch HT
7. Millanes AM
8. Wedin M
9. Yurkov AM
10. Boekhout T
11. Bai FY
(2015) Towards an integrated phylogenetic classification of the Tremellomycetes
Studies in Mycology 81:85–147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2015.12.001
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Liu L
2. He G-J
3. Chen L
4. Zheng J
5. Chen Y
6. Shen L
7. Tian X
8. Li E
9. Yang E
10. Liao G
11. Wang L
(2018) Genetic basis for coordination of meiosis and sexual structure maturation in Cryptococcus neoformans
eLife 7:e38683.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38683
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Loftus BJ
2. Fung E
3. Roncaglia P
4. Rowley D
5. Amedeo P
6. Bruno D
7. Vamathevan J
8. Miranda M
9. Anderson IJ
10. Fraser JA
11. Allen JE
12. Bosdet IE
13. Brent MR
14. Chiu R
15. Doering TL
16. Donlin MJ
17. D’Souza CA
18. Fox DS
19. Grinberg V
20. Fu J
21. Fukushima M
22. Haas BJ
23. Huang JC
24. Janbon G
25. Jones SJM
26. Koo HL
27. Krzywinski MI
28. Kwon-Chung JK
29. Lengeler KB
30. Maiti R
31. Marra MA
32. Marra RE
33. Mathewson CA
34. Mitchell TG
35. Pertea M
36. Riggs FR
37. Salzberg SL
38. Schein JE
39. Shvartsbeyn A
40. Shin H
41. Shumway M
42. Specht CA
43. Suh BB
44. Tenney A
45. Utterback TR
46. Wickes BL
47. Wortman JR
48. Wye NH
49. Kronstad JW
50. Lodge JK
51. Heitman J
52. Davis RW
53. Fraser CM
54. Hyman RW
(2005) The genome of the basidiomycetous yeast and human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans
Science 307:1321–1324.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103773
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Lopez-Delisle L
2. Rabbani L
3. Wolff J
4. Bhardwaj V
5. Backofen R
6. Grüning B
7. Ramírez F
8. Manke T
(2021) pyGenomeTracks: reproducible plots for multivariate genomic datasets
Bioinformatics 37:422–423.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa692
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Love MI
2. Huber W
3. Anders S
(2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Genome Biology 15:550.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2007) An expanded inventory of conserved meiotic genes provides evidence for sex in Trichomonas vaginalis
PLOS ONE 3:e2879.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002879
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1978) Filobasidiella arachnophila sp. nov
Canadian Journal of Botany 56:1823–1826.
https://doi.org/10.1139/b78-220
- Google Scholar
1. Manni M
2. Berkeley MR
3. Seppey M
4. Simão FA
5. Zdobnov EM
(2021) BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral Genomes
Molecular Biology and Evolution 38:4647–4654.
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab199
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Marra RE
2. Huang JC
3. Fung E
4. Nielsen K
5. Heitman J
6. Vilgalys R
7. Mitchell TG
(2004) A genetic linkage map of Cryptococcus neoformans variety neoformans serotype D (Filobasidiella neoformans)
Genetics 167:619–631.
https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.103.023408
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Book
1. Maynard-Smith J.
(1978)
The evolution of sex

Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Google Scholar
(2006) Pheromones and pheromone receptors are required for proper sexual development in the homothallic ascomycete Sordaria macrospora
Genetics 172:1521–1533.
https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.047381
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2002) Isolation and characterization of the Cryptococcus neoformans MATa pheromone gene
Genetics 160:935–947.
https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/160.3.935
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2008) The mating-type chromosome in the filamentous ascomycete Neurospora tetrasperma represents a model for early evolution of sex chromosomes
PLOS Genetics 4:e1000030.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000030
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Software
1. Michigan Geomicrobiology Lab
(2019) gcSkew
GitHub.

https://github.com/Geo-omics/scripts/blob/master/scripts/gcSkew
(2020a) New methods to calculate concordance factors for phylogenomic datasets
Molecular Biology and Evolution 37:2727–2733.
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa106
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2020b) IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era
Molecular Biology and Evolution 37:1530–1534.
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa015
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2000) Sex and the single lichen
Nature 404:564.
https://doi.org/10.1038/35007142
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Neaves WB
2. Baumann P
(2011) Unisexual reproduction among vertebrates
Trends in Genetics 27:81–88.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2010.12.002
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Ni M
2. Feretzaki M
3. Sun S
4. Wang X
5. Heitman J
(2011) Sex in fungi
Annual Review of Genetics 45:405–430.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132536
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Ni M
2. Feretzaki M
3. Li W
4. Floyd-Averette A
5. Mieczkowski P
6. Dietrich FS
7. Heitman J
(2013) Unisexual and heterosexual meiotic reproduction generate aneuploidy and phenotypic diversity de novo in the yeast Cryptococcus neoformans
PLOS Biology 11:e1001653.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001653
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Nielsen K
2. Cox GM
3. Wang P
4. Toffaletti DL
5. Perfect JR
6. Heitman J
(2003) Sexual cycle of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii and virulence of congenic a and α isolates
Infection and Immunity 71:4831–4841.
https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.71.9.4831-4841.2003
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Nieuwenhuis BPS
2. Immler S
(2016) The evolution of mating-type switching for reproductive assurance
BioEssays 38:1141–1149.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201600139
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2018) Repeated evolution of self-compatibility for reproductive assurance
Nature Communications 9:1639.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04054-6
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Paoletti M
2. Seymour FA
3. Alcocer MJC
4. Kaur N
5. Calvo AM
6. Archer DB
7. Dyer PS
(2007) Mating type and the genetic basis of self-fertility in the model fungus Aspergillus nidulans
Current Biology 17:1384–1389.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.012
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Passer AR
2. Coelho MA
3. Billmyre RB
4. Nowrousian M
5. Mittelbach M
6. Yurkov AM
7. Averette AF
8. Cuomo CA
9. Sun S
10. Heitman J
(2019) Genetic and genomic analyses reveal noundaries between species closely related to Cryptococcus pathogens
mBio 10:e00764.
https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00764-19
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Petch T
(1931) Notes on entomogenous fungi
Transactions of the British Mycological Society 16:55–75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(31)80006-3
- Google Scholar
(1996) A putative cyclic peptide efflux pump encoded by the TOXA gene of the plant-pathogenic fungus Cochliobolus carbonum
Microbiology 142 (Pt 6):1557–1565.
https://doi.org/10.1099/13500872-142-6-1557
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Rajasingham R
2. Smith RM
3. Park BJ
4. Jarvis JN
5. Govender NP
6. Chiller TM
7. Denning DW
8. Loyse A
9. Boulware DR
(2017) Global burden of disease of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: an updated analysis
The Lancet. Infectious Diseases 17:873–881.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30243-8
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2007) The virulence of human pathogenic fungi: notes from the South of France
Cell Host & Microbe 2:77–83.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2007.07.004
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2000) EMBOSS: the european molecular biology open software suite
Trends in Genetics 16:276–277.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02024-2
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Roach KC
2. Feretzaki M
3. Sun S
4. Heitman J
(2014) Unisexual reproduction
Advances in Genetics 85:255–305.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800271-1.00005-6
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Roberts P.
(1997)
New Heterobasidiomycetes from Great Britain

Mycotaxon 63:195–216.
- Google Scholar
(2011) Integrative genomics viewer
Nature Biotechnology 29:24–26.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1754
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2010) Morphological and genomic characterization of Filobasidiella depauperata: a homothallic sibling species of the pathogenic Cryptococcus species complex
PLOS ONE 5:e9620.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009620
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Software
1. Rosen J
(2022) Dfam TE Tools Container
GitHub.

https://github.com/Dfam-consortium/TETools
1. Roth C
2. Sun S
3. Billmyre RB
4. Heitman J
5. Magwene PM
(2018) A high-resolution map of meiotic recombination in Cryptococcus deneoformans demonstrates decreased recombination in unisexual reproduction
Genetics 209:567–578.
https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.118.300996
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1983) On the taxonomy of the entomogenous fungus Filobasidiella arachnophila
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 49:447–456.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00399323
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Schotanus K
2. Heitman J
(2020) Centromere deletion in Cryptococcus deuterogattii leads to neocentromere formation and chromosome fusions
eLife 9:e56026.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56026
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Schurko AM
2. Logsdon JM
(2008) Using a meiosis detection toolkit to investigate ancient asexual “scandals” and the evolution of sex
BioEssays 30:579–589.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.20764
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Seibel C
2. Tisch D
3. Kubicek CP
4. Schmoll M
(2012) The role of pheromone receptors for communication and mating in Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei
Fungal Genetics and Biology 49:814–824.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2012.07.004
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Seo JA
2. Han KH
3. Yu JH
(2004) The gprA and gprB genes encode putative G protein-coupled receptors required for self-fertilization in Aspergillus nidulans
Molecular Microbiology 53:1611–1623.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04232.x
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Software
1. Simpson J
2. Matei D
3. Pineda J
4. Tang P
(2019) Nanopolish, version 0.11.2
GitHub.

https://github.com/jts/nanopolish
(2003) Genetic relatedness among Filobasidiella species
Mycopathologia 156:157–162.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023309311643
- Google Scholar
1. Song MH
2. Lee JW
3. Kim MS
4. Yoon JK
5. White TC
6. Floyd A
7. Heitman J
8. Strain AK
9. Nielsen JN
10. Nielsen K
11. Bahn YS
(2012) A flucytosine-responsive Mbp1/Swi4-like protein, Mbs1, plays pleiotropic roles in antifungal drug resistance, stress response, and virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans
Eukaryotic Cell 11:53–67.
https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.05236-11
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Srb AM
(1956)
Spontaneous and chemically-induced mutations giving rise to canavanine resistance in yeast

Comptes Rendus Des Travaux Du Laboratoire Carlsberg. Serie Physiologique 26:363–380.
- Google Scholar
(2011) Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer
Bioinformatics 27:1009–1010.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Sun S
2. Hsueh YP
3. Heitman J
(2012) Gene conversion occurs within the mating-type locus of Cryptococcus neoformans during sexual reproduction
PLOS Genetics 8:e1002810.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002810
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2014) Unisexual reproduction drives meiotic recombination and phenotypic and karyotypic plasticity in Cryptococcus neoformans
PLOS Genetics 10:e1004849.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004849
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Sun S
2. Yadav V
3. Billmyre RB
4. Cuomo CA
5. Nowrousian M
6. Wang L
7. Souciet JL
8. Boekhout T
9. Porcel B
10. Wincker P
11. Granek JA
12. Sanyal K
13. Heitman J
(2017) Fungal genome and mating system transitions facilitated by chromosomal translocations involving intercentromeric recombination
PLOS Biology 15:e2002527.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2002527
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Sun S
2. Coelho MA
3. David-Palma M
4. Priest SJ
5. Heitman J
(2019a) The evolution of sexual reproduction and the mating-type locus: links to pathogenesis of Cryptococcus human pathogenic fungi
Annual Review of Genetics 53:417–444.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-120116-024755
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Sun S
2. Lin X
3. Coelho MA
4. Heitman J
(2019b) Mating-system evolution: all roads lead to selfing
Current Biology 29:R743–R746.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.073
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2019c) Cryptococcus neoformans mating and genetic crosses
Current Protocols in Microbiology 53:e75.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpmc.75
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Sun S
2. Fu C
3. Ianiri G
4. Heitman J
(2020) The pheromone and pheromone receptor mating-type locus is involved in controlling uniparental mitochondrial inheritance in Cryptococcus
Genetics 214:703–717.
https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.119.302824
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2012) Combining laser microdissection and RNA-seq to chart the transcriptional landscape of fungal development
BMC Genomics 13:511.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-511
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Tian X
2. He GJ
3. Hu P
4. Chen L
5. Tao C
6. Cui YL
7. Shen L
8. Ke W
9. Xu H
10. Zhao Y
11. Xu Q
12. Bai F
13. Wu B
14. Yang E
15. Lin X
16. Wang L
(2018) Cryptococcus neoformans sexual reproduction is controlled by a quorum sensing peptide
Nature Microbiology 3:698–707.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-018-0160-4
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1993) Gene transfer in Cryptococcus neoformans by use of biolistic delivery of DNA
Journal of Bacteriology 175:1405–1411.
https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.175.5.1405-1411.1993
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Tsubouchi H
2. Roeder GS
(2002) The Mnd1 protein forms a complex with Hop2 to promote homologous chromosome pairing and meiotic double-strand break repair
Molecular and Cellular Biology 22:3078–3088.
https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.9.3078-3088.2002
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2009) Spores as infectious propagules of Cryptococcus neoformans
Infection and Immunity 77:4345–4355.
https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00542-09
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2005) VariScan: Analysis of evolutionary patterns from large-scale DNA sequence polymorphism data
Bioinformatics 21:2791–2793.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti403
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Virag A
2. Griffiths AJF
(2004) A mutation in the Neurospora crassa actin gene results in multiple defects in tip growth and branching
Fungal Genetics and Biology 41:213–225.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2003.10.010
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Walker BJ
2. Abeel T
3. Shea T
4. Priest M
5. Abouelliel A
6. Sakthikumar S
7. Cuomo CA
8. Zeng Q
9. Wortman J
10. Young SK
11. Earl AM
(2014) Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement
PLOS ONE 9:e112963.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112963
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Wang P
2. Cutler J
3. King J
4. Palmer D
(2004) Mutation of the regulator of G protein signaling Crg1 increases virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans
Eukaryotic Cell 3:1028–1035.
https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.3.4.1028-1035.2004
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Book
1. Williams GC.
(1975)
Sex and evolution

Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Google Scholar
(2015) Homothallism: an umbrella term for describing diverse sexual behaviours
IMA Fungus 6:207–214.
https://doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2015.06.01.13
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2021) Doing it alone: Unisexual reproduction in filamentous ascomycete fungi
Fungal Biology Reviews 35:1–13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2020.12.003
- Google Scholar
1. Yadav V
2. Sun S
3. Billmyre RB
4. Thimmappa BC
5. Shea T
6. Lintner R
7. Bakkeren G
8. Cuomo CA
9. Heitman J
10. Sanyal K
(2018) RNAi is a critical determinant of centromere evolution in closely related fungi
PNAS 115:3108–3113.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713725115
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Yadav V
2. Sun S
3. Heitman J
(2021) Uniparental nuclear inheritance following bisexual mating in fungi
eLife 10:e66234.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66234
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Yin J
2. Zhang C
3. Mirarab S
(2019) ASTRAL-MP: scaling ASTRAL to very large datasets using randomization and parallelization
Bioinformatics 35:3961–3969.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz211
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Zakharyevich K
2. Tang S
3. Ma Y
4. Hunter N
(2012) Delineation of joint molecule resolution pathways in meiosis identifies a crossover-specific resolvase
Cell 149:334–347.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.023
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1999) Crossing over during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis requires a conserved MutS-based pathway that is partially dispensable in budding yeast
Genetics 153:1271–1283.
https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/153.3.1271
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2010) LOX: inferring Level Of eXpression from diverse methods of census sequencing
Bioinformatics 26:1918–1919.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq303
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Book
(2017)
ASTRAL-III: increased scalability and impacts of contracting low support branches

In: Meidanis J, Nakhleh L, editors. In Comparative Genomics. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 53–75.
- Google Scholar
1. Zhao Y
2. Lin J
3. Fan Y
4. Lin X
(2019) Life cycle of Cryptococcus neoformans
Annual Review of Microbiology 73:17–42.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-120210
- PubMed
- Google Scholar

Decision letter

Antonis Rokas

Reviewing Editor; Vanderbilt University, United States
Detlef Weigel

Senior Editor; Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Germany
Paul Dyer

Reviewer; University of Nottingham, United Kingdom

Our editorial process produces two outputs: i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Obligate sexual reproduction of a homothallic fungus closely related to the Cryptococcus pathogenic species complex" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 2 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Detlef Weigel as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in the review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Paul Dyer (Reviewer #1).

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions:

Both reviewers have made numerous suggestions on how to improve the clarity and accuracy of the presentation of your findings. Please consider them carefully and revise the manuscript accordingly.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

The authors are congratulated on a significant and very interesting study that has been performed at a very high standard. Indeed, the fact that the study is so comprehensive and thorough has inevitably meant that there are some required corrections, clarifications, and suggestions to improve the manuscript given the very long length, as listed below (line numbering from supplied A4 PDF).

(1) Lines 94-96 and lines 812-813. Can add the example of homothallism in lichen-forming fungi as an example of reproductive assurance in species with patchy distributions, pre-dating the other citations [Murtagh et al., (2000). Nature 404: 564. https://doi.org/10.1038/35007142].

(2) Lines 105. Close up space after C. neoformans.

(3) Lines 115, 315 Need to hyphenate 'mating-type' where used as an adjective. By contrast, remove hyphens where not an adjective e.g. line 146.

(4) Line 116. For preciseness use "Among these genes are those encoding for the mating-type specific pheromones…."

(5) Line 127. Need to remove accidental 'the' after "unique to the mating type (the) of the cell".

(6) Line 252. Refer to five 'major' inversions. However, arguably only two of these are 'major' and the others involve a relatively minor number of genes. So authors might wish to rephrase this sentence?

(7) Line 264. States that nearly zero sequence divergence seen except for 'the' (my emphasis) rDNA locus. This indicates that there was only a single rDNA locus in the genome. However, normally there are multiple rDNA loci and Figure 1A Circos plot seems to confirm this? So please clarify this statement e.g. make it clear applies to only one of several rDNA loci if this is the case.

(8) Lines 301-320. General question (perhaps beyond this paper but for thought). How does the genome sequence divergence specifically at the MAT locus compare to the general sequence divergence between the two isolates of C. depauperatus? Could give clues as to whether this region exhibits restricted cross over as seen in some other fungal systems.

(9) Line 362. Use of 'however' is redundant in this sentence as no preceding contrast. So can delete it?

(10) Lines 555-561. Gene deletion is stated to be confirmed by PCR. Was Southern blotting also used as backup? Admittedly perhaps not essential now with PCR diagnostics.

(11) Line 573. Reword to "…process in C. depauperatus can occur independently of pheromone-receptor signaling…" as more nuanced than a simple "is independent of".

(12) Lines 742-749. Must admit I am confused here. From previous logic it seems that only recombinant CAN and FUR spores containing complementary recessive alleles from the mating partners should be recovered from the selective media, and yet it is stated that double-drug resistant isolates were recovered that lacked "the expected mutant parent alleles". So what was their origin (also listed in Figure 7D where only 1.9-97.3% were recombinant leaving many that were not)? Is it possible, for example, that the spore collection method also harvested heterokaryotic basidia and hyphae that had not undergone meiosis but had the complementary parent nuclei? Please explain.

(13) Lines 915-919. Studies in Aspergillus nidulans have shown that homothallism in this species does not bypass the requirements for partner signalling, but instead requires activation of the heterothallic signalling pathway for sexual development in a single individual. Could cite this work as a nice parallel here to the findings in C. depauperatus. See Paoletti et al., (2007), Current Biology 17: 1384-1389; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.012

(14) Line 923. For clarity change to “…genes, including the MFα gene encoding the mating pheromone precursor, are found outside of…”.

(15) Line 923. Refers to lipophilic peptides, but to clarify would the MFα gene product be expected to be a hydrophilic α rather than lipophilic a-type, so argument not apply to the same extent?

(16) Line 1079. Need close bracket rather than semi-colon after the web address.

(17) Methods section. The ‘RNA extraction and RNA-seq analysis” section include catalog numbers, which are missing elsewhere. So omit for consistency?

(18) Line 1246. For clarity change to “The C. depauperatus pheromone precursor encoding gene was amplified…”.

(19) Line 1247, 1256, 1279. Recommend to insert species from which the various promotor and upstream regions were amplified for clarity. Seems was C. neoformans, but in the main text, the ACT1 promotor from C. depauperatus is mentioned? And what is the ACT1 gene, is this a housekeeping high activity one – please provide some background.

(20) Line 1321. How long were spores exposed to UV, no time period mentioned?

(21) Line 1417. Which primers were used for ‘PCR interrogation’, very little detail at this very end?

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

L970: After finishing reading the manuscript, I realized that I don’t have a clear picture of what the authors envisage the life cycle of C. depauperatus to be, and what precisely they mean by the terms “obligate sexual reproduction” (title) or “constitutive sexual reproduction” (L819). As stated on L66, most fungi have a balance of sexual cycles and asexual (mitotic) cycles of cell division. I agree that the evidence in this manuscript says that sexual cycles are occurring at a high frequency in C. depauperatus, and previous work has indicated that there are no yeast-form cells. But are the authors proposing that mitotic cell divisions do not occur at all in this species [or only during the formation of chains of spores]? It’s not clear to me whether or not this is their proposal, or indeed whether there is any data pertinent to this point. When a haploid basidiospore is released from a basidium, is its only option to mate rather than to divide vegetatively? Perhaps some of these issues have been discussed in Kwon-Chung’s papers from the 1970s, but it would be good to repeat them here for a new generation of readers.

L362-365: It took me a while to realize that Ste3a is the receptor for α-pheromone and that its name derives from the fact that it is present only in MATa strains (of C. neoformans). This fact is explained later (L494-497) but it would be clearer if L362 stated that these are a pheromone and its receptor, rather than that they are “alleles of opposite mating types”.

L451: I'm not familiar with LOX analysis, but the text seems to imply that a P-value of 1 is statistically significant in this method which is counterintuitive. Some more explanation of what LOX is, and how it differs from DEseq2, would be helpful.

L556-560: The two sentences on these lines seem to contradict each other. The first seems to say that you obtained only 5 deletion mutant strains. The second seems to say that you obtained 41 deletion mutant strains.

L561-613: (1) In Figure 5B, are the orange bars simply 100% minus the blue bars? Or is there a third small group of basidia that were unclassifiable? If there is no third category, I don’t think that side-by-side bars are a clear way to present the result. A single stacked bar would be better, or simply omit the orange bars.

(2) Figure 5B includes results for a mfαΔ ste3Δ double mutant, but it doesn’t seem to be mentioned in the text.

L186: “the hypothesis was put forth…”. This statement needs to cite a reference, probably early Kwon-Chung papers.

L634: Delete “because”.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79114.sa1

Author response

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

The authors are congratulated on a significant and very interesting study that has been performed at a very high standard. Indeed, the fact that the study is so comprehensive and thorough has inevitably meant that there are some required corrections, clarifications, and suggestions to improve the manuscript given the very long length, as listed below (line numbering from supplied A4 PDF).

We thank the reviewer for the positive and constructive remarks. We have introduced several modifications to the manuscript in response to the reviewer’s concerns and suggestions.

(1) Lines 94-96 and lines 812-813. Can add the example of homothallism in lichen-forming fungi as an example of reproductive assurance in species with patchy distributions, pre-dating the other citations [Murtagh et al., (2000). Nature 404: 564. https://doi.org/10.1038/35007142].

We thank the reviewer for this suggestion and have included this appropriate reference in the revised manuscript.

(2) Lines 105. Close up space after C. neoformans.

Revised as suggested.

(3) Lines 115, 315 Need to hyphenate 'mating-type' where used as an adjective. By contrast, remove hyphens where not an adjective e.g. line 146.

We followed the reviewer recommendation and revised all of the occurrences as suggested.

(4) Line 116. For preciseness use "Among these genes are those encoding for the mating-type specific pheromones…."

Revised as suggested.

(5) Line 127. Need to remove accidental 'the' after "unique to the mating type (the) of the cell".

Thank you for pointing this out. We have removed the extra word as suggested.

(6) Line 252. Refer to five 'major' inversions. However, arguably only two of these are 'major' and the others involve a relatively minor number of genes. So authors might wish to rephrase this sentence?

We understand the reviewer’s viewpoint here and have rephrased as follows on lines 231-236: “…the chromosome structure seems to be overall conserved between the two C. depauperatus isolates, except for five inversions (two large and three small, of which four are coupled with duplicated sequences at the borders), and the predicted centromeric regions that differ considerably in length between some of the homologous chromosomes (figure 1—figure supplement 3).”

(7) Line 264. States that nearly zero sequence divergence seen except for 'the' (my emphasis) rDNA locus. This indicates that there was only a single rDNA locus in the genome. However, normally there are multiple rDNA loci and Figure 1A Circos plot seems to confirm this? So please clarify this statement e.g. make it clear applies to only one of several rDNA loci if this is the case.

We appreciate the reviewer’s comment. However, we found that in both C. depauperatus strains the rDNA repeats are located at a single locus on Chr. 1 as a tandem array. This has been observed in other species, including the budding yeast S. cerevisiae and e.g., in C. neoformans. The assembled region in each of the C. depauperatus strains contains six complete copies of the rDNA, which, nonetheless, should be a collapsed representation of the full-size array. An interesting aspect, however, is that the rDNA array in C. depauperatus is only composed of 28S-5.8S-18S genes. The 5S rRNA genes are not part of the tandemly repeated rDNA array. Instead, they are dispersed throughout the genome, as observed in fungi such as Neurospora crassa (Metzenberg et al., 1985), Aspergillus nidulans (Bartnik and Borsuk 1983) and Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Mao et al., 1982). Interestingly, within the Cryptococcus genus, there seem to be two major rDNA array configurations as shown in Author response image 1: (i) one, where each rDNA unit also comprises a copy of the 5S rRNA gene positioned in the intergenic spacer (e.g., as in C. gattii, C. neoformans, C. deneoformans); and another (ii) where the 5S rRNA genes are localized separately (as in C. depauperatus, C. amylolentus, etc.)

Author response image 1

Download asset Open asset

Interestingly, these observed differences in the rDNA cluster between C. neoformans and C. depauperatus have been previously reported by Kwon-Chung et al., (Kwon-Chung et al., 1997). We concede that the circos plot might not illustrate all of this information, but it shows that the 5S genes (marked in darker blue) are found scattered in the genome, while the 18-28S rDNA array (lighter blue) is found only on Chr. 1. As we think these details and differences are not essential for the current manuscript, we would prefer to present and discuss these and other comparative genomic analyses in a manuscript currently being prepared that will focus on the structural genomic features across the diversity of the Cryptococcus genus. Nevertheless, to clarify the point raised by the reviewer, we revised the circos plot key on Figure 1 by adding the 5.8S gene to the rDNA array [now reads: “18S-5.8S-28S (rDNA array)”] and modified the text between lines 241-245 so that it now reads as follows:“A sliding window analysis detected a relatively uniform pattern of sequence divergence across the genome and no evidence of introgression between the two isolates as shown by the absence of genomic tracts with nearly zero sequence divergence (except for the rDNA array, composed of 18S-5.8S-28S, which is found as a single unit on Chr 1)…”

(8) Lines 301-320. General question (perhaps beyond this paper but for thought). How does the genome sequence divergence specifically at the MAT locus compare to the general sequence divergence between the two isolates of C. depauperatus? Could give clues as to whether this region exhibits restricted cross over as seen in some other fungal systems.

We thank the reviewer for this important question. It is usually the case that the divergence within the MAT locus is higher between opposite mating types of the same species compared to other genomic regions, and this is usually a signature of suppression of recombination. Within basidiomycetes, there are now multiple documented examples in which recombination suppression evolved repeatedly, linking the two mating-type loci (P/R and HD), followed by subsequent extension of the region beyond the mating type genes. One such example is the Cryptococcus pathogenic clade (such as in C. neoformans and C. gattii) discussed in this manuscript, in which the MAT locus is highly rearranged between opposite mating types and suppressed for recombination via crossing-over [although recombination via gene conversion can still occur (Sun et al., 2012)], resulting in a higher divergence at MAT compared to other genomic regions.

In C. depauperatus, we considered that it would be less likely to see an elevated divergence at the proposed MAT locus given homothallism, and the fact that in C. depauperatus, the haploid nuclei that fuse prior to meiosis are completely identical in intra-strain crosses and this region is also structurally similar between the two strains. Thus, recombination with crossing-over is likely to occur within the MAT locus region of C. depauperatus, similar to that observed during α-α unisexual reproduction in C. deneoformans (Sun et al., 2014). We also mention that the proposed MAT locus in C. depauperatus underwent substantial remodeling via genome reshuffling and gene loss compared to both C. amylolentus and C. neoformans MAT loci, which itself likely indicates that in C. depauperatus there is minimal or no selection maintaining this region as a cluster of tightly linked loci, in contrast to that observed in heterothallic species with defined mating types.

Despite this reasoning, we followed the reviewer suggestion, and measured the divergence between the two C. depauperatus strains for the proposed MAT locus region using the approach previously described in the Material and Methods. We found that the average divergence for the MAT-containing chromosome (Chr 4) is ~1.6% (shown in Figure 1—figure supplement 4), while the divergence falls to ~1.3% within the MAT region (k, with Jukes-Cantor correction). Comparable values were also obtained when using Dnadiff, which is a wrapper for the NUCmer alignment program from MUMmer, that quantifies the differences between two sequences. Therefore, we think this level of divergence within MAT is unlikely to be associated with any form of suppression for recombination.

(9) Line 362. Use of 'however' is redundant in this sentence as no preceding contrast. So can delete it?

Thank you for pointing this out. We revised as recommended and expanded to accommodate a suggestion from reviewer #2 (lines 309-313):

“Sequence alignments and phylogenetic analyses further showed that the predicted product of the MF gene is highly similar to other α/A1 pheromones (Figure 2B), whereas Ste3 clusters together with α/A2 alleles from other Cryptococcus species (Figure 2C), indicating they might constitute a compatible pheromone-receptor pair.”

(10) Lines 555-561. Gene deletion is stated to be confirmed by PCR. Was Southern blotting also used as backup? Admittedly perhaps not essential now with PCR diagnostics.

We admittedly did not confirm gene deletions by Southern blotting. All deletions were instead carefully inspected by in-gene, spanning, and junction (5’ and 3’ flanking) PCRs, which we think provide equivalent validation. To make it more transparent, all the gels are now provided as source information associated with the corresponding figures. Specifically, Figure 4–source data 1, related to ectopic expression of C. depauperatus MFa gene in C. neoformans WT, ste3 and ste6 deletion mutants; and Figure 5—figure supplement 1–source data 1, related with the construction of mfa, ste3 and dmc1 deletion mutants in C. depauperatus.

(11) Line 573. Reword to "…process in C. depauperatus can occur independently of pheromone-receptor signaling…" as more nuanced than a simple "is independent of".

Agreed and revised as suggested.

(12) Lines 742-749. Must admit I am confused here. From previous logic it seems that only recombinant CAN and FUR spores containing complementary recessive alleles from the mating partners should be recovered from the selective media, and yet it is stated that double-drug resistant isolates were recovered that lacked "the expected mutant parent alleles". So what was their origin (also listed in Figure 7D where only 1.9-97.3% were recombinant leaving many that were not)? Is it possible, for example, that the spore collection method also harvested heterokaryotic basidia and hyphae that had not undergone meiosis but had the complementary parent nuclei? Please explain.

We were also initially intrigued by the fact that we were recovering double-drug resistant progeny that did not have either one or the other can1 or fur1 parental mutant alleles. However, upon inspection of some of these isolates by PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing (results given in Figure 7—figure supplement 1) we uncovered that some of the double-drug resistant progeny had gained de novo spontaneous mutations in CAN1 or FUR1 loci that were different from those of the parental isolates. This information was previously stated (now in lines 576-582) as follows:

“When PCR-RFLP analysis did not match the parental genotypes at both loci, the isolate was not scored as a progeny despite being double-drug resistant. Rather than cell fusion and meiosis generating the double can1 fur1 mutant resistant to both canavanine and 5-FC, Sanger sequencing revealed that in such cases a spontaneous mutation had arisen on the background of the already known can1 or fur1 parental mutations (Figure 7—figure supplement 1). Therefore, only resistant isolates that contained the parental can1 and fur1 mutant alleles upon validation by PCR-RFLP were scored as a recombinant progeny.”

We further elaborate in the Material and Methods section (lines 1188-1197) about the origin of these non-recombinant, double-drug resistant, isolates and the approach used to score only the recombinant ones.

We also think the possibility of having harvested heterokaryotic basidia or hyphae that had not undergone meiosis instead of meiotic products is very unlikely, particularly because as we note in lines 564-567:

“these mutations both confer recessive drug resistance; thus, in crosses of can1 and fur1 mutants, this allows haploid meiotic F1 progeny to be selected by virtue of resistance to both drugs, whereas any diploid fusion products (can1/CAN1 FUR1/fur1) would be sensitive to both drugs as a result of complementation.”

(13) Lines 915-919. Studies in Aspergillus nidulans have shown that homothallism in this species does not bypass the requirements for partner signalling, but instead requires activation of the heterothallic signalling pathway for sexual development in a single individual. Could cite this work as a nice parallel here to the findings in C. depauperatus. See Paoletti et al., (2007), Current Biology 17: 1384-1389; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.012

We thank the reviewer for this excellent suggestion. It is indeed a nice parallel to the findings in C. depauperatus and, thus, we expanded this section to include this interesting study (lines 730-734).

(14) Line 923. For clarity change to "…genes, including the MFα gene encoding the mating pheromone precursor, are found outside of…".

Clarified as suggested.

(15) Line 923. Refers to lipophilic peptides, but to clarify would the MFα gene product be expected to be a hydrophilic α rather than lipophilic a-type, so argument not apply to the same extent?

We appreciate the reviewer’s feedback. However, while in ascomycetes, the pheromones for the two mating types are asymmetric with respect to size and hydrophobicity (the α-factor is an unmodified peptide, and the a-factor is farnesylated and carboxymethylated at a C-terminal CAAX box, making it very hydrophobic), this asymmetry is not observed in basidiomycetes. Instead, all basidiomycetes, irrespective of their mating type, express lipid-modified, a-factor-like, pheromones, and “chemo-sensing” specificity is mediated by allelic variants of the a-factor/Ste3 genes (designated, in its simplest configuration in opposite mating types, as MFα/STE3α and MFa/STE3a). Therefore, as both mating types produce poorly diffusible pheromones, duplication of these genes in some basidiomycetes may have been selected for to promote more efficient foraging for mating partners. In contrast, the presence of a single MFα gene in C. depauperatus suggests that selection may have acted to reduce the energetic burden of additional gene copies without an obvious benefit, since the pheromone (MFα) and receptor (STE3a) expressed in the same cell are intercompatible.

(16) Line 1079. Need close bracket rather than semi-colon after the web address.

Altered as suggested.

(17) Methods section. The 'RNA extraction and RNA-seq analysis" section include catalog numbers, which are missing elsewhere. So omit for consistency?

We have removed the catalog numbers from the main text following the reviewer recommendation.

(18) Line 1246. For clarity change to "The C. depauperatus pheromone precursor encoding gene was amplified…".

Revised as suggested.

(19) Line 1247, 1256, 1279. Recommend to insert species from which the various promotor and upstream regions were amplified for clarity. Seems was C. neoformans, but in the main text, the ACT1 promotor from C. depauperatus is mentioned? And what is the ACT1 gene, is this a housekeeping high activity one – please provide some background.

Thank you for this suggestion and we agree this was not completely clear. We have revised the corresponding sections in the Material and Methods and provided a few additional details to make it more transparent. The ACT1 gene encodes for actin, and the promoter of this gene if efficient in regulating constitutive gene expression. The C. neoformans H99 ACT1 promoter and terminator were employed for heterologous expression of the C. depauperatus pheromone gene. Plasmids for ectopic integration and gene deletion in C. depauperatus harbored a NAT resistant gene under control of the C. depauperatus ACT1 promotor and the terminator of the phosphoribosyl anthranilate isomerase (TRP1) gene.

(20) Line 1321. How long were spores exposed to UV, no time period mentioned?

We thank the reviewer for raising this issue. The reason why we don’t mention a time period is because we used the “Energy Mode” selection on the Stratalinker. In this mode, we are specifying the overall amount of UV energy that is delivered to the cells rather than a specific length of exposure. However, after careful revision of the procedure employed, we noted there was a typo in the UV energy values reported originally. Instead of 100, 200 and 300 µJ/cm², it should state 10,000, 20,000, and 30,000 µJ/cm². This typo was due to labeling of the samples sent for sequencing in the abbreviated form that appears in the Stratalinker display (i.e., the numbers on the display represent µJ/cm² × 100; e.g., setting to 100 means 100 x 100 = 10,000 µJ/cm²), which was then transposed into the manuscript. We apologize for this oversight, and have corrected the values in line 1132.

(21) Line 1417. Which primers were used for 'PCR interrogation', very little detail at this very end?

We appreciate this was not described with sufficient detail. We have now rephased lines 1227-1230 to: “Cells from individual basidiospores were plated onto YPD and YPD+NAT, gDNA was extracted, and the MFα and STE3 genes were interrogated by PCR using the diagnostic primers listed in Supplementary File 2 for the corresponding gene or 3’ junctions of mfαΔ::NAT and ste3Δ::NAT deletion loci”.

We also altered a few details in the Supplementary File 2 to provide a better description of each of the primers used in this study.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

L970: After finishing reading the manuscript, I realized that I don't have a clear picture of what the authors envisage the life cycle of C. depauperatus to be, and what precisely they mean by the terms "obligate sexual reproduction" (title) or "constitutive sexual reproduction" (L819). As stated on L66, most fungi have a balance of sexual cycles and asexual (mitotic) cycles of cell division. I agree that the evidence in this manuscript says that sexual cycles are occurring at a high frequency in C. depauperatus, and previous work has indicated that there are no yeast-form cells. But are the authors proposing that mitotic cell divisions do not occur at all in this species [or only during the formation of chains of spores]? It's not clear to me whether or not this is their proposal, or indeed whether there is any data pertinent to this point. When a haploid basidiospore is released from a basidium, is its only option to mate rather than to divide vegetatively? Perhaps some of these issues have been discussed in Kwon-Chung's papers from the 1970s, but it would be good to repeat them here for a new generation of readers.

We appreciate the reviewer’s concern about the use of the terms “obligate sexual reproduction” and/or “constitutive sexual reproduction”. Unlike other Cryptococcus species, C. depauperatus does not have an asexual yeast stage, and grows exclusively as hyphae. When a spore germinates (approx. after 48h), it produces monokaryotic hyphae extending from the two poles of the germinating spore and the nuclei in these hyphae divide by mitosis. Hyphae maturation and basidia formation occurs soon after (~144-196 h) followed by meiosis and repeated rounds of mitosis to produce long chains of spores. Therefore, C. depauperatus, seems to be permanently undergoing sexual reproduction. In other words, only the sexual developmental program seems to be active at any given time during the life cycle. While this may not be exactly the same as obligate sexual reproduction in animals, it does mean that every spore that is produced results from meiotic event and there are no asexual structures/propagules (e.g., conidia). Among other fungi, the homothallic ascomycete Sordaria macrospora has also been considered obligately sexual (Teichert et al., 2014), and most basidiomycete mushroom-forming species of the Agaricomycotina subphylum are considered to be so as well.

To clarify this, we rephrased a statement in lines 186-189 such that now read as:

“Considering the striking resemblance of its growth with the sexual life cycle of other Cryptococcus species, the hypothesis was put forth that C. depauperatus is homothallic and only the sexual developmental program is active at any given time during the life cycle of this species (Malloch et al., 1978; Kwon-Chung et al., 1995; Rodriguez-Carres et al., 2010).”

We also replaced the term “constitutive” or ”constitutively” by terms such as “continuously” (e.g., lines 639, 795) when referring to the C. depauperatus sexual cycle.

L362-365: It took me a while to realize that Ste3a is the receptor for α-pheromone and that its name derives from the fact that it is present only in MATa strains (of C. neoformans). This fact is explained later (L494-497) but it would be clearer if L362 stated that these are a pheromone and its receptor, rather than that they are "alleles of opposite mating types".

We have updated the revised manuscript as recommended such that this section now reads as (lines 309-313):

“Sequence alignments and phylogenetic analyses further showed that the predicted product of the MF gene is highly similar to other α/A1 pheromones (Figure 2B), whereas Ste3 clusters together with a/A2 alleles from other Cryptococcus species (Figure 2C), indicating they might be a compatible pheromone-receptor pair”.

We hope this change provides enough clarification at this point in the manuscript. Later, we provide further experimental evidence confirming this initial result obtained from sequence/phylogenetic analyses.

L451: I'm not familiar with LOX analysis, but the text seems to imply that a P-value of 1 is statistically significant in this method which is counterintuitive. Some more explanation of what LOX is, and how it differs from DEseq2, would be helpful.

We appreciate the reviewer’s concern and have provided a few additional details in the Material and Methods section (lines 1042-1046). LOX (Levels Of eXpression) reports (among other statistics) Bayesian p-values for differential expression (essentially, likelihoods that a gene is differentially expressed), in contrast to methods like DESeq, which report p-values that indicate statistical significance (essentially, likelihoods that a gene is not differentially expressed). Therefore, with LOX, a larger p-value is better (maximum would be 1, and we have found LOX to be relatively "optimistic" in its assessment, so anything below 1 should be taken as most likely not differentially expressed in the dataset). The reason why we used LOX in addition to DESeq2 is because LOX uses a different type of underlying statistics that is not sensitive to the percentage of differentially expressed genes (in contrast to DESeq2, which might give unreliable results if too many genes are differentially expressed, because it works with the underlying assumption that the majority of genes are not differentially expressed). Therefore, if both methods (LOX and DESeq2) indicate that a gene is differentially expressed, one can be sure that this is not biased by some specific underlying statistical method.

L556-560: The two sentences on these lines seem to contradict each other. The first seems to say that you obtained only 5 deletion mutant strains. The second seems to say that you obtained 41 deletion mutant strains.

We thank the reviewer for this observation and agree that the two sentences as stated could be misleading. Therefore, we decided to remove second sentence (line 472-474) which described to the average proportion of analyzed transformants obtained from a given transformation experiment that had a correct gene deletion.

L561-613: (1) In Figure 5B, are the orange bars simply 100% minus the blue bars? Or is there a third small group of basidia that were unclassifiable? If there is no third category, I don't think that side-by-side bars are a clear way to present the result. A single stacked bar would be better, or simply omit the orange bars.

The reviewer is correct! These represent percentage of basidia with and without spore chains. As suggested, we changed the graph on Figure 5B to a stacked bar plot to better illustrate the data. For consistency we similarly changed the layout of the graph on Figure 6B. The corresponding figure legends were revised where needed to accommodate these changes. Also, for simplicity of presentation, we removed the individual counts (represented as white dots in the previous version of the two graphs), but all the numerical raw data is given as source data (Figure 5–source data 1 and Figure 6–source data 1).

(2) Figure 5B includes results for a mfαΔ ste3Δ double mutant, but it doesn't seem to be mentioned in the text.

Thanks for raising this point. The mfαΔ ste3Δ double mutant is mentioned the legend of Figure 5 and was isolated from progeny of mfαΔ x ste3Δ co-cultures. We concur that this should also appear in the text and have introduced a new sentence in lines 487-489 that states:

“A mfαΔ ste3Δ double mutant isolated from progeny of mfαΔ x ste3Δ co-cultures (see next section) displayed similar defects as the single mutants (Figure 5B).”

L186: "the hypothesis was put forth…". This statement needs to cite a reference, probably early Kwon-Chung papers.

We cited a previous paper from the lab and two other references (Malloch et al., 1978; Kwon-Chung et al., 1995; Rodriguez-Carres et al., 2010) that we think are the most suitable to support the revised statement in lines 186-189.

L634: Delete "because".

Thank you for pointing this out. We have removed the extra word as suggested.

References

Bartnik E, Borsuk P. 1983. Transcription of the rRNA gene cluster in Aspergillus nidulans. Curr Genet 7: 113-115.

Guterres DC, Ndacnou MK, Saavedra-Tobar LM, Salcedo-Sarmiento S, Colman AA, Evans HC, Barreto RW. 2021. Cryptococcus depauperatus, a close relative of the human-pathogen C. neoformans, associated with coffee leaf rust (Hemileia vastatrix) in Cameroon. Braz J Microbiol 52: 2205-2214.

Kwon-Chung KJ, Chang YC, Bauer R, Swan EC, Taylor JW. 1995. The characteristics that differentiate Filobasidiella depauperata from Filobasidiella neoformans. Stud Mycol 38: 67-79.

Kwon-Chung KJ, Chang YC, Penoyer L. 1997. Species of the genus Filobasidiella differ in the organization of their 5S rRNA genes. Mycologia 89: 244-249.

Malloch D, Kane J, Lahai DG. 1978. Filobasidiella arachnophila sp. nov. Can J Bot 56: 1823-1826.

Mao J, Appel B, Schaack J, Sharp S, Yamada H, Söll D. 1982. The 5S RNA genes of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nucleic Acids Res 10: 487-500.

Metzenberg RL, Stevens JN, Selker EU, Morzycka-Wroblewska E. 1985. Identification and chromosomal distribution of 5S rRNA genes in Neurospora crassa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82: 2067-2071.

Rodriguez-Carres M, Findley K, Sun S, Dietrich FS, Heitman J. 2010. Morphological and genomic characterization of Filobasidiella depauperata: a homothallic sibling species of the pathogenic Cryptococcus species complex. PLoS One 5: e9620.

Savelkoul E, Toll C, Benassi N, Logsdon JM. 2019. Multiple separate cases of pseudogenized meiosis genes Msh4 and Msh5 in Eurotiomycete fungi: associations with Zip3 sequence evolution and homothallism, but not Pch2 losses. bioRxiv doi:10.1101/750497: 750497.

Sun S, Billmyre RB, Mieczkowski PA, Heitman J. 2014. Unisexual reproduction drives meiotic recombination and phenotypic and karyotypic plasticity in Cryptococcus neoformans. PLoS Genet 10: e1004849.

Sun S, Hsueh YP, Heitman J. 2012. Gene conversion occurs within the mating-type locus of Cryptococcus neoformans during sexual reproduction. PLoS Genet 8: e1002810.

Teichert I, Nowrousian M, Poggeler S, Kuck U. 2014. The filamentous fungus Sordaria macrospora as a genetic model to study fruiting body development. Adv Genet 87: 199-244.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79114.sa2

Article and author information

Author details

Andrew Ryan Passer

Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States

Contribution
Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing - preliminary draft as a thesis chapter, Writing – review and editing

Contributed equally with
Shelly Applen Clancey

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Shelly Applen Clancey

Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States

Contribution
Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing, Incorporating revisions from co-authors, Writing the final draft

Contributed equally with
Andrew Ryan Passer

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Terrance Shea

Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States

Contribution
Formal analysis, Validation

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Márcia David-Palma

Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States

Contribution
Investigation, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Anna Floyd Averette

Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States

Contribution
Technical support, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Teun Boekhout
1. Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands
2. Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Contribution
Resources, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Betina M Porcel

Génomique Métabolique, CNRS, University Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France

Contribution
Resources, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Minou Nowrousian

Lehrstuhl für Molekulare und Zelluläre Botanik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany

Contribution
Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Visualization, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0075-6695
Christina A Cuomo

Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States

Contribution
Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5778-960X
Sheng Sun

Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States

Contribution
Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2895-1153
Joseph Heitman

Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States

Contribution
Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

For correspondence
heitm001@duke.edu

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6369-5995
Marco A Coelho

Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States

Contribution
Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing, Incorporating revisions from co-authors, Writing the final draft

For correspondence
marco.dias.coelho@duke.edu

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5716-0561

Funding

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI50113-17)

Joseph Heitman

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI39115-24)

Joseph Heitman

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI33654-04)

Joseph Heitman

National Institutes of Health (U54HG003067)

Christina A Cuomo

German Research Foundation (NO407/7-2)

Minou Nowrousian

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank Vikas Yadav for critical reading of the manuscript, Fred Dietrich for computational resources, Valerie Lapham of the Center for Electron Microscopy at North Carolina State University for assistance with SEM, and the Broad Institute Genomics Platform for generating Illumina sequences. We are indebted to Rytas Vilgalys for inspiring us to study the unusual homothallic life cycle of Cryptococcus depauperatus. This study was supported by NIH/NIAID R01 Award AI50113-17 and NIH/NIAID R01 Award AI39115-24 awarded to JH, R01 grant AI33654-04 awarded to JH, David Tobin, and Paul Magwene, and NIH/NHGRI grant U54HG003067 to the Broad Institute. MN acknowledges support from German Research Foundation, DFG grant NO407/7-2. JH is also Co-Director and Fellow of the CIFAR program Fungal Kingdom: Threats & Opportunities.

Senior Editor

Detlef Weigel, Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Germany

Reviewing Editor

Antonis Rokas, Vanderbilt University, United States

Reviewer

Paul Dyer, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom

Publication history

Preprint posted: March 30, 2022 (view preprint)
Received: March 31, 2022
Accepted: June 15, 2022
Accepted Manuscript published: June 17, 2022 (version 1)
Version of Record published: July 19, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.