Ferric reductase-related proteins mediate fungal heme acquisition

  1. Udita Roy
  2. Shir Yaish
  3. Ziva Weissman
  4. Mariel Pinsky
  5. Sunanda Dey
  6. Guy Horev
  7. Daniel Kornitzer  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Molecular Microbiology, B. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Israel
  2. Bioinformatics Knowledge Unit, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Israel

Abstract

Heme can serve as iron source in many environments, including the iron-poor animal host environment. The fungal pathobiont Candida albicans expresses a family of extracellular CFEM hemophores that capture heme from host proteins and transfer it across the cell wall to the cell membrane, to be endocytosed and utilized as heme or iron source. Here, we identified Frp1 and Frp2, two ferric reductase (FRE)-related proteins that lack an extracellular N-terminal substrate-binding domain, as being required for hemoglobin heme utilization and for sensitivity to toxic heme analogs. Frp1 and Frp2 redistribute to the plasma membrane in the presence of hemin, consistent with a direct role in heme trafficking. Expression of Frp1 with the CFEM hemophore Pga7 can promote heme utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as well, confirming the functional interaction between these proteins. Sequence and structure comparison reveals that the CFEM hemophores are related to the FRE substrate-binding domain that is missing in Frp1/2. We conclude that Frp1/2 and the CFEM hemophores form a functional complex that evolved from FREs to enable extracellular heme uptake.

Editor's evaluation

This work focuses on the important problem of how a human pathogenic fungus obtains iron during infection. This study uses biochemical and genetic methods to identify the missing link between heme receptors and heme utilization by cells. Specifically, they provide convincing evidence that the ferric reductase-like proteins Frp1 and Frp2 have major roles in iron acquisition from heme, thus identifying a new function for these proteins. Understanding how pathogenic fungi obtain iron and identifying differences in fungal and host iron metabolism can provide valuable leads for drug discovery.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80604.sa0

eLife digest

Hosts and disease-causing fungi are often locked into a battle over resources. The host will attempt to withhold molecules that the fungus needs to survive, while the pathogen will try to find alternative routes to obtain them. Candida albicans, for example, can go after the atoms of iron embedded in the proteins of the organism it infects. To do so it releases molecules known as hemophores, which scavenge the iron-containing heme molecule that equips oxygen-carrying proteins in the blood.

Once captured, the heme is carried across the wall that protects C. albicans from the environment and brought to the membrane of the cell. It is then taken in and trafficked inside vesicles to its destination. However, the identity of the molecular actors which help to bridge the internal and external segments of the heme journey remain unclear. Previous studies have shown that the hemophore Pga7 is involved, but this protein is attached to the outside of the cell membrane, where it cannot directly interact with the import machinery.

Roy et al. set out to discover this missing link. Examining the genomes of fungal species related to C. albicans highlighted two membrane proteins, Frp1 and Frp2, which could participate in heme uptake. Protein sequence comparison revealed that Frp1 and Frp2 were closely related to ferric reductases, a group of membrane enzymes which can chemically alter extracellular iron prior to uptake.

Deleting the genes for Frp1 and Frp2 rendered C. albicans cells incapable of taking in heme. Conversely, a fungal species which cannot normally uptake heme could efficiently internalise these complexes when artificially equipped with Frp1 and Pga7, suggesting that the two proteins work closely together. Finally, protein structure comparisons highlighted that an extracellular domain present in ferric reductases but absent in Frp1 and Frp2 is, in fact, related to Pga7 and other hemophores. This implies that the iron and heme uptake systems may share a common evolutionary origin. Overall, the work by Roy et al. reveals a new family of proteins which allow disease-causing fungi to steal iron from their hosts. This knowledge may be useful to design better anti-fungal treatments.

Introduction

Candida albicans is a commensal microorganism of the human host (Ghannoum et al., 2010; Nash et al., 2017). It is normally found on mucosal surfaces and on the skin as part of the normal microbial flora. It is also one of the most common human fungal pathogens, causing infections that range from superficial infections such as vulvovaginal candidiasis (Sobel, 2007) to life-threatening systemic infections when the immune system is weakened or when there is damage to epithelial barriers (Kullberg and Arendrup, 2015). Candida species, of which the most prevalent is C. albicans, are responsible for an estimated 750,000 cases of systemic candidiasis annually, with a mortality rate of around 40% (Bongomin et al., 2017; Pfaller et al., 2012).

Like most organisms, C. albicans requires iron for its survival. Iron can be found in several oxidation states, of which the more common are Fe2+ and Fe3+. The low solubility of ferric iron (Fe3+) makes iron acquisition challenging in oxidizing environments. Many unicellular organisms express ferric reductases (FREs) on their surface, which can contribute to iron acquisition by reducing ferric iron to its more soluble ferrous (Fe2+) ion and/or extracting it from iron chelates (Kornitzer, 2009; Kosman, 2003; Philpott, 2006). The C. albicans genome contains at least 15 genes encoding FRE-like proteins, including Fre1/Cfl1 and the major iron reductase Fre10 (Baek et al., 2008; Hammacott et al., 2000; Knight et al., 2005).

Heme, or Fe-protoporphyrin IX, is a molecule that serves as a cellular cofactor almost universally across life. As such, it is present in many natural environments, and thus, environmental heme can be utilized as an alternative iron source by many organisms, via a large repertoire of heme acquisition systems (Donegan et al., 2019). In animals, HRG-1-like heme transporters conserved from C. elegans to mammals can mediate extracellular heme import or intracellular heme transport (Rajagopal et al., 2008; Reddi and Hamza, 2016) and the human membrane protein FLVCR2 functions as a heme importer (Duffy et al., 2010).

For microorganisms, the animal host environment poses a particular challenge for iron acquisition, as the host restricts the availability of free iron by a variety of active mechanisms as part of a defense strategy called ‘nutritional immunity’ (Ganz, 2018; Weinberg, 1975). In this environment, hemoglobin heme, comprising about two-thirds of the total iron, is therefore expected to be a particularly attractive iron source, and indeed it is utilized by many bacterial pathogens via several well-studied mechanisms that involve distinct extracellular hemophore families and plasma membrane ABC transporters (Cassat and Skaar, 2013; Contreras et al., 2014; Ganz and Nemeth, 2015; Hood and Skaar, 2012; Huang and Wilks, 2017).

Fungi have also evolved different mechanisms to internalize heme, involving a membrane heme receptor in the case of Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Labbé et al., 2020; Mourer et al., 2015) and an endocytosis-based mechanism in the case of Cryptococcus neoformans (Bairwa et al., 2019; Bairwa et al., 2017; Cadieux et al., 2013). C. albicans and other Candida spp. express a distinct family of GPI-anchored and soluble extracellular hemophores containing a heme-binding CFEM domain (Roy and Kornitzer, 2019). Pga7 and Rbt5 are GPI-anchored to the cell membrane and the cell wall, respectively, while Csa2 is secreted to the medium (Kuznets et al., 2014; Nasser et al., 2016; Weissman and Kornitzer, 2004). These three CFEM proteins are all able to extract heme from hemoglobin and to transfer it among themselves, consistent with a model where heme captured from hemoglobin or other host heme-binding proteins, such as serum albumin, is transferred across the cell wall to the plasma membrane (Kuznets et al., 2014; Nasser et al., 2016; Pinsky et al., 2020). Heme binding to the CFEM domain involves a unique aspartic acid-mediated heme-iron coordination that renders the heme-binding redox-sensitive: only ferriheme (Fe3+) binds to the CFEM domain (Nasser et al., 2016).

Heme utilization in C. albicans requires, in addition to the CFEM hemophores, components of the endocytic pathway and the ESCRT system, and vacuolar function (Weissman et al., 2008), suggesting that it involves endocytosis of the heme to the vacuole. However, GPI-anchored proteins are not known to be subject to ESCRT-mediated endocytosis, suggesting the existence of (an) additional transmembrane protein(s) involved in heme internalization. Here, we describe the identification and characterization of Frp1 and Frp2, plasma membrane proteins related to FREs, that are essential for heme uptake and utilization in C. albicans.

Results

Phylogenetic profiling for identification of new heme-iron acquisition genes

Analysis of genomes from species related to C. albicans indicated that many carry CFEM proteins related to Pga7, Rbt5, and Csa2 (Nasser et al., 2016). We found that across fungal genomes of the Ascomycete clades most closely related to C. albicans, distinct relatives of Rbt5, Pga7, and Csa2 can be identified in almost every genome (Figure 1—figure supplement 1 shows a proximity tree of Rbt5-related proteins from 14 Saccharomycetales genomes). One exception is Meyerozyma (Candida) guilliermondii, which completely lacks any coding sequence related to these CFEM proteins, unlike equally distant relatives of C. albicans such as Debaryomyces hansenii (Kurtzman and Suzuki, 2010). In order to identify additional proteins involved in heme uptake, we applied phylogenetic profiling or pathway co-evolution analysis. Briefly, this method is based on the assumption that, as organisms can acquire new functions and evolve new pathways by gene duplication, acquisition and modification, organisms can similarly lose functions, and their associated genes, when they are no longer required. Genes encoding a single functional pathway are thus expected to be preserved or eliminated in a correlated fashion across genomes, according to whether the function is present or absent in a given organism (Li et al., 2014; Pellegrini et al., 1999). Sequenced fungal genomes currently number well over one thousand, including many tens of Saccharomycetales (Butler et al., 2009; Grigoriev et al., 2014). Two genes whose presence was best correlated with the presence of Rbt5-related CFEM genes were FRP1and FRP2 (see Materials and methods for details).

C. albicans Frp1 and Frp2 were previously classified as FREs (Almeida et al., 2009), based on their homology to the main C. albicans FRE Fre10 (Knight and Dancis, 2006), as well as to Cfl1, another C. albicans protein that was experimentally shown to function as an FRE (Hammacott et al., 2000). However, alignment followed by phylogenetic tree building indicates that Frp1 and Frp2 cluster separately from most FRE homologs, including Fre10 and Cfl1 (Figure 1—figure supplement 2A). Notably, Frp1 and Frp2 lack an N-terminal domain present in most other FREs (Figure 1—figure supplement 2B).

Frp1 and Frp2 are 36% identical, and out of 13 Saccharomycetales listed in the Candida Gene Order Browser database (cgob3.ucd.ie; Fitzpatrick et al., 2010; Maguire et al., 2013) that have Frp homologs, 12 have an Frp1 ortholog, and 10 have an Frp2 ortholog. Interestingly, FRP1 and FRP2 are adjacent to two CFEM protein genes in the C. albicans genome, FRP1 to PGA7 and FRP2 to CSA1. In both cases, the adjacent genes are arranged head-to-head and share a promoter region. This synteny is conserved across most genomes (75% for FRP1-PGA7 and 70% for FRP2-CSA1; Figure 1—figure supplement 3).

Frp1 and Frp2 are required for heme-iron utilization

To directly examine the role of Frp1 and Frp2 in heme-iron acquisition, their genes were deleted and the hemoglobin-iron utilization phenotypes were analyzed by growth on YPD plates supplemented with 1 mM bathophenanthroline disulfonate (BPS), an iron chelator, and hemoglobin as iron source. As shown in Figure 1A, the frp1-/- strain was unable to form colonies on the plate with hemoglobin as the sole iron source. Reintegration of a wild-type FRP1 allele completely reverted the growth defect. In contrast, the frp2-/- strain showed no growth defect. We next performed this assay in medium buffered to pH 8.5. On the alkaline plates, we found that the frp1-/- strain was still unable to form colonies, whereas the frp2-/- strain showed a partial defect in heme-iron utilization, and reintegration of the FRP2 wild-type allele complemented this growth defect (Figure 1A).

Figure 1 with 4 supplements see all
FRP1 is essential for hemoglobin-iron acquisition, whereas FRP2 contributes to growth on hemoglobin at alkaline pH.

(A) Fivefold dilutions of cultures of the indicated strains were spotted on YPD or YPD pH 8.5, with the indicated supplements, and incubated for 3 days (Hb and BPS plates) or 2 days (YPD plates) at 30°C. WT = KC2, FRP1+/-=KC859, frp1-/-=KC870, frp1-/-<FRP1 >= KC1024, FRP2+/-=KC901, frp2-/-=KC912, frp2-/-<FRP2 >= KC1379. (B) The strains with indicated genotypes in the ccc2-/- background were grown in triplicates in YPD or YPD pH 8.5 media supplemented with 1 mM ferrozine and the indicated amounts of hemoglobin, and incubated at 30°C for 3 days. Each result is the average of three cultures. Standard deviations are indicated by vertical bars. WT = KC811, frp1-/-=KC1146, frp2-/-=KC1414, frp1-/- frp2-/-=KC1412, frp1-/-<FRP1 >= KC1146, frp2-/-<FRP2>=KC1411. (C) The frp1-/- and frp2-/- heme-iron utilization phenotype was compared to that of the CFEM protein mutants rbt5-/- and pga7-/-. The strains were grown in YPD or YPD pH 8.5, with 1 mM ferrozine and the indicated concentrations of hemoglobin or hemin, and grown and measured as in B. Wild type = KC68, rbt5-/-=KC139, pga7-/-=KC485, frp1-/-=KC923, frp2-/-=KC913. All strains in B and C carry a deletion of the CCC2 gene, which causes a defect in high-affinity iron import and prevents growth in the presence of ferrozine.

The heme-iron utilization was also tested in liquid medium, using a set of frp1-/-, frp2-/-, and frp1-/-frp2-/- double deletion strains introduced in a background made defective in high-affinity iron acquisition by deletion of the copper transporter CCC2 (Weissman et al., 2002), which makes the cells unable to grow in the presence of the iron chelator ferrozine. Growth of the mutants was assayed in the presence of increasing concentrations of hemoglobin. In unbuffered YPD (pH ~ 6.5), the same picture was seen as on plates, with the frp1-/- mutant unable to utilize hemoglobin-iron and the frp2-/- mutant unaffected (Figure 1B). In alkaline YPD (pH 8.5), the frp1-/- mutant failed to grow, whereas the frp2-/- mutant exhibited reduced growth, suggesting that this mutant is able to utilize hemoglobin, but at a reduced rate (Figure 1B). Reintegration of the wild-type FRP1 and FRP2 genes in the respective mutant backgrounds restored wild-type growth in unbuffered YPD, but did not completely restore growth at pH 8.5. This could be due to haploinsufficiency or to reduced expression of the reintegrated allele under these conditions.

We also compared growth of the frp1-/- and frp2-/- mutants to that of the CFEM protein mutants rbt5-/- and pga7-/-, on either hemoglobin or hemin as iron source. As shown in Figure 1C, in all media the frp1-/- mutant was as defective as the pga7-/- mutant, which is lacking the most essential CFEM protein (Kuznets et al., 2014). In YPD, both the frp1-/- and pga7-/- strains were unable to grow on hemoglobin, and the rbt5-/- mutant showed an intermediate phenotype, as noted before (Kuznets et al., 2014; Weissman and Kornitzer, 2004) whereas on hemin, growth of frp1-/- and pga7-/- was partially restored at higher concentrations, to similar extents. At pH 8.5, all mutants exhibited reduced growth on both hemoglobin and hemin, with frp1-/- and pga7-/- again showing the deepest defect (Figure 1C).

Since compared to the established FREs, Frp1 and Frp2 are relatively similar to each other, we asked whether differential expression of FRP2 was the reason that it could not replace FRP1, that is, that the frp1-/- strain is unable to utilize hemoglobin even though FRP2 is present in these cells. To answer this, we placed the FRP2 open reading frame under the control of the FRP1 promoter and transformed the resulting plasmid into the frp1-/- and frp2-/- strains. The FRP1p-FRP2 construct could complement the frp2-/- but not the frp1-/- mutant (Figure 1—figure supplement 4), indicating that differential expression is not the reason that Frp2 is inactive in hemoglobin-iron utilization in unbuffered medium. Rather, this suggests that the Frp1 and Frp2 proteins are functionally distinct.

Frp1 and Frp2 mediate heme uptake into the cytoplasm

To monitor heme uptake by the frp1 and frp2 mutants more directly, we took advantage of a recently developed cytoplasmic heme sensor system, based on a heme-quenchable GFP-cytochrome fusion. In this detection system, an mKATE2 red fluorescent domain linked to the GFP-cytochrome fusion serves as an internal fluorescence control. The ratio of GFP to mKATE2 fluorescence gives a measure of available cytoplasmic heme, with lower ratios indicating stronger GFP quenching due to higher cytochrome occupancy, that is, higher cytoplasmic heme concentrations. To expand the range of testable concentrations, a lower-affinity cytochrome domain mutant (M7A) can be used alongside the high-affinity original sensor (HS1) (Hanna et al., 2016; Weissman et al., 2021).

Wild-type, frp1-/-, frp2-/-, and frp1-/- frp2-/-double mutant cells expressing the HS1 and M7A sensors were exposed to increasing hemin concentrations in the medium for 4 hr, and sensor fluorescence was measured. To ensure expression of the heme uptake system, the cells were grown with 1 mM ferrozine, which imposes iron limitation and activates the heme-uptake genes. The medium was buffered to pH 8.5, a condition where Frp2 was shown to be required as well (Figure 1). As can be seen in Figure 2 (bottom panel), the low-affinity cytoplasmic sensor showed minimal occupancy in the absence of external hemin (fluorescence ratio of 10–12) and in the presence of hemin, only the wild-type cells showed a slight but significant increase in sensor occupancy. The wild-type HS1 sensor, in contrast, showed a fluorescence ratio of 2.5–3 in all strains in the absence of added hemin to the medium, indicating a partial occupancy which reflects the steady-state free heme concentration in the cytoplasm. In medium supplemented with 10 μM hemin, in wild-type cells sensor occupancy became nearly maximal, indicating an increase in cytoplasmic hemin concentration. The increase in occupancy was much less in the frp1-/- mutant, and lesser still in the frp2-/- and frp1-/- frp2-/- strains, even when exposed to 30 and 50 μM hemin in the medium. Thus, while cellular heme concentrations do rise with extracellular heme, the increase in intracellular heme is much reduced in the frp1-/- and frp2-/- strains, and almost inexistent in the frp1-/- frp2-/- strain. The reduced increase in sensor occupancy in the frp2-/- mutant exposed to external hemin compared to the frp1-/- mutant suggests that Frp2 is more important for heme influx into the cytoplasm than Frp1 under these conditions, in spite of Frp1 being dominant for heme utilization even at pH 8.5 (Figure 1).

The frp1-/- and frp2-/- mutants are defective in heme uptake from the cytoplasm.

The high-affinity HS1 and low-affinity M7A ratiometric heme sensors were used to monitor heme influx into the cytoplasm in the wild-type (KC2), frp1-/-(KC870), frp2-/-(KC912), and frp1-/- frp2-/- strains (KC1410) grown for 4 hr in YPD medium at pH 8.5 with 1 mM ferrozine, and with the indicated concentrations of hemin chloride. Each data point is the average of three different cultures, each measured twice. Vertical bars indicate standard deviations, and the asterisks indicate measurements that are significantly different from the 0 μM hemin reading with p≤0.0001.

FRP1 and FRP2 are differentially required for non-iron metalloprotoporphyrin uptake and toxicity

The non-iron metalloprotoporphyrins (MPPs) are synthetic heme derivatives that have a non-iron metal atom instead of the iron at the center of the porphyrin ring structure. Many MPPs are toxic to bacteria, and this toxicity depends on the bacterial heme-import pathways (Hijazi et al., 2017; Mitra et al., 2017; Olczak et al., 2012; Stojiljkovic et al., 2001; Wakeman et al., 2014). Two MPPs, Ga3+- protoporphyrin IX (Ga-PPIX) and Mn3+-protoporphyrin IX (Mn-PPIX) were also found to be toxic to the pathogenic fungus C. neoformans, and their toxicity depended on some of the same factors required for heme uptake in that organism (Bairwa et al., 2019; Hu et al., 2015). We tested toxicity of these two MPPs as well as of Co3+-protoporphyrin IX (Co-PPIX) and Zn2+- protoporphyrin IX (Zn-PPIX) in YPD medium supplemented with 1 mM ferrozine to induce the heme-uptake pathway, and found that all of them are toxic to C. albicans. To investigate the roles of Frp1 and Frp2 in uptake of these compounds, we then tested the frp1-/-, frp2-/-, and double mutants for Ga-PPIX, Mn-PPIX, Co-PPIX, and Zn-PPIX sensitivity in regular YPD medium and in YPD medium buffered to pH 7.5 (Figure 3A). In regular YPD medium, the frp1-/- mutant showed increased resistance to all of the MPPs tested except Ga-PPIX. The frp2-/- mutant showed increased resistance to Zn-PPIX and to a lesser extent to Mn-PPIX but not to Co-PPIX or to Ga-PPIX. At pH 7.5, the frp2-/- strain but not the frp1-/- strain showed increased resistance to Ga-PPIX. The frp2-/- strain also showed increased resistance to Mn-PPIX and Zn-PPIX, and to a lesser extent, so did the frp1-/- strain (Co-PPIX was not toxic at pH 7.5). In summary, Frp1 and Frp2 were required for full toxicity of at least some of the MPPs in either unbuffered YPD medium (pH ~ 6.5) or in medium buffered to pH 7.5, with Frp1 being more important for toxicity in unbuffered medium and Frp2 for toxicity at pH 7.5.

Figure 3 with 2 supplements see all
Frp1 and Frp2 participate in the uptake of heme homologs.

(A) FRP1 and FRP2 are differentially required for sensitivity to toxic heme homologs. The indicated strains were diluted in YPD medium with different concentrations of metal-protoporphyrin IX compounds, as indicated, and grown in 96-well plates at 30°C for 2 days. The graph points indicate the averages of triplicate cultures, and the standard deviations are indicated by vertical bars. The strains used are KC590 (WT), KC966 (frp1-/-), KC1053 (frp2-/-), KC1061 (frp1-/- frp2-/-). (B) Expression of either FRP1 or FRP2 is sufficient to enable ZnMP uptake. Wild-type strain KC2 (WT), strain KC1080 that has a single FRP1 gene under the SSB1 promoter (SSB1p-FRP1) and strain KC1244 that has a single FRP2 gene under the SSB1 promoter (SSB1p-FRP2) were grown in YPD to log phase, then exposed to 1 mM ZnMP for 10 min, washed and visualized by epifluorescence microscopy. Scale bar = 5 μm.

In view of the essential role of the CFEM hemophore Pga7 in heme acquisition, and of the fact that CFEM hemophores can bind GaPPIX, MnPPIX, and to some extent CoPPIX (our unpublished data), we tested whether Pga7 is required for MPP toxicity. As shown in Figure 3—figure supplement 1, no difference could be detected in the sensitivity of pga7-/- vs. PGA7 cells, indicating that Pga7 is not involved in the uptake of these compounds.

Next, we checked if Frp1 and Frp2 can mediate uptake of Zn2+-mesoporphyrin (ZnMP). ZnMP is a fluorescent porphyrin that structurally resembles heme and that has been used to analyze heme uptake pathways in mammalian and fungal cells (Mourer et al., 2017; Worthington et al., 2001). We found that in a wild-type strain, iron starvation induces the ability of the cells to take up ZnMP, and the addition of hemin to the medium efficiently inhibits it, suggesting that ZnMP is taken up by the same pathway as heme (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). We also noted that unlike in S. pombe and mammalian cells, where the ZnMP fluorescent signal is diffusely cytoplasmic, in C. albicans, the fluorescent signal remains mainly associated with membrane-like structures.

Since in cells growing in regular iron-replete medium, ZnMP uptake is negligible, presumably due to lack of expression of the heme-uptake system genes, we could ask whether Frp1 or Frp2 alone were sufficient to mediate ZnMP uptake by ectopically expressing them under these conditions. FRP1 and FRP2 were placed under the promoter of SSB1, a gene that is strongly expressed under different growth conditions (Ofir et al., 2012), and ZnMP uptake was monitored in these cells. Both SSB1p-FRP1- and SSB1p-FRP2-harboring cells showed a strong intracellular ZnMP signal (Figure 3B). This indicates that Frp1 and Frp2 are each sufficient to mediate uptake of ZnMP.

Frp1 and Frp2 relocalize to the cell surface in the presence of heme

FREs are typically located on the plasma membrane, where they reduce extracellular iron (Lesuisse et al., 1987; Shatwell et al., 1996; Yun et al., 2001). To determine the subcellular localization of Frp1 and Frp2, we constructed an Frp1-GFP and an Frp2-GFP fusion under the control of their endogenous promoters. These fusion proteins retained heme uptake activity, as evidenced by their ability to support growth on hemoglobin (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). Both the Frp1-GFP and Frp2-GFP signals became visible after induction by iron starvation and were localized at the cell surface and at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and the GFP signals also accumulated in the vacuole (Figure 4A). Identification of the vacuole and perinuclear ER membrane was verified with CMAC, a fluorophore specific for the vacuole and Hoechst 33342, a nuclear stain, respectively (Figure 4A).

Figure 4 with 2 supplements see all
Subcellular localization of Frp1-GFP and Frp2-GFP fusion proteins.

(A) The cells (Frp1-GFP=KC914, Frp2-GFP=KC1405) were grown in iron-limited medium for 3 hr. Left panels: Localization of the Frp-GFP proteins vs. the nuclear stain Hoechst 33324. Right panels: Localization of the Frp-GFP proteins vs. the vacuole stain CMAC. Scale bars = 5 μm. (B) Location of Frp1-GFP and Frp2-GFP after induction by iron starvation, without and with added 50 μM hemin. The cells were grown to late-log phase in YPD, then shifted to the indicated media, and visualized at the indicated times by epifluorescence microscopy. Scale bar = 5 μm. (C) Kinetics of Frp1/2-GFP relocation after exposure to hemin. The cells were grown in iron-limited medium for 3 hr and then 50 µM hemin was added. The graphs describe quantitation of subcellular localization of the Frp1-GFP and Frp2-GFP signals after exposure to hemin. At least 100 cells were observed for each timepoint, and the signal intensity at each subcellular location was assigned a value from 0 to 3. The graph indicates the average intensities at each of four cellular locations. Note that ‘ER’ denotes location on the perinuclear membrane and its projections, whereas ‘plasma membrane’ could possibly also include cortical ER, which cannot be differentiated at this level of resolution. The asterisks indicate the plasma membrane values that differ statistically from t=0’ with p<0.00001 by Mann-Whitney’s U test.

Induction of Frp1-GFP and Frp2-GFP was monitored by shifting log-phase cells growing in YPD to YPD+ferrozine (Frp1-GFP) or to YPD pH 8.5+ferrozine (Frp2-GFP), without or with added hemin. Samples were removed 1, 2, and 3 hr after induction for microscopic observation and for protein analysis by Western blot. By microscopic observation, the GFP signal increased with time, and in the absence of hemin, was mostly detected in the vacuole. In the presence of hemin, the plasma membrane signal became much more prominent (Figure 4B). In addition, Frp2-GFP expression appeared higher, and more prominently vacuolar, compared to Frp1-GFP. Analysis of the proteins by Western blot also showed induction of Frp1-GFP and Frp2-GFP in iron-limited medium (Figure 4—figure supplement 2A), and showed decay of the protein upon shift back to YPD medium (Figure 4—figure supplement 2B). This analysis furthermore indicated that Frp2-GFP expression is higher than Frp1-GFP. Under all conditions, only full-length GFP fusion proteins were detectable, suggesting that the GFP signals visible on the micrographs represent full-length, potentially active protein.

In order to measure the kinetics of relocalization of Frp1-GFP and Frp2-GFP to the cell surface in the presence of hemin, cells induced as above for 3 hr were exposed to hemin, and the GFP signal localization was monitored every 10 min. A significant increase in cell surface GFP signal was detectable for both proteins after 30 min exposure to hemin (Figure 4C).

Expression of Frp1 in S. cerevisiae promotes heme uptake in the presence of Pga7

The data shown above indicate that Frp1 and Frp2 are able to mediate the uptake of metal-substituted heme analogs even in the absence of the extracellular hemophore cascade, represented by the membrane-bound hemophore Pga7 (Figure 3A, Figure 3—figure supplement 1). The CFEM hemophores are however necessary for heme uptake. To better characterize the minimal requirements for Frp1-mediated heme uptake, we attempted to reconstitute it in S. cerevisiae, an organism lacking an efficient heme uptake system, using FRP1 expressed under the strong H2B histone gene promoter. In order to assess the requirement of the extracellular hemophore cascade in Frp1-mediated heme uptake in S. cerevisiae, FRP1 was expressed either in the presence or absence of PGA7 under the adjacent H2A histone gene promoter. To monitor heme uptake, we used a hem1Δ mutant, unable to synthesize heme. The S. cerevisiae hem1Δ strain is usually maintained in the presence of the Hem1 product δ-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) in the medium, however it can also grow when supplied with a high enough hemin concentrations in the medium.

As shown in Figure 5A, expression of Frp1 together with Pga7 promoted better growth of the hem1 strain on plates containing hemin. In liquid medium, expression of Frp1 together with Pga7 enabled growth of the hem1 strain at much lower hemin concentrations than in their absence, consistent with a more efficient heme uptake in these cells (Figure 5B, 2 days). Upon longer incubation, expression of Frp1 alone, but not of Pga7 alone, was found to promote some growth over background as well (Figure 5B, 3 days). This observation indicates that Frp1 by itself can promote heme uptake into the cell, albeit with lower efficiency.

Frp1 and Pga7 collaborate in heme uptake.

(A) Saccharomyces cerevisiae hem1Δ cells (KY1498) were transformed with a vector plasmid, or with plasmids HTB2p-FRP1 (KB2569), HTA2p-PGA7(KB2789) or HTB2p-FRP1 HTA2p-PGA7 (KB2566) and drop-diluted on SC-HIS plates supplemented with either 0.2 μM hemin or 50 μg/ml δ-aminolevulinic acid (ALA), as indicated. The plates were incubated for 2 days at 30°C. (B) The same strains were diluted in SC-HIS medium supplemented with the indicated amounts of hemin, and incubated at 30°C for 2 or 3 days, as indicated. For each plasmid, three independent transformant colonies were grown. The data indicate the average of the three cultures, and the error bars indicate the standard deviations. Statistically significant differences compared to vector control are indicated with one asterisk (p<0.05) or two asterisks (p<0.001) (Student’s t-test).

Homology between CFEM proteins and the FRE N-terminal domains

The structure of Csa2, a CFEM hemophore with high sequence homology to Pga7, indicated, at the time when it was solved, that it assumes a new protein fold, lacking any structural homologs in the 3D protein structure database (Nasser et al., 2016). We took advantage of the recent availability, through the Alphafold project (Jumper et al., 2021), of high-quality structure predictions of all C. albicans proteins, to search again for CFEM structural homologs. Remarkably, beyond the five related CFEM hemophore proteins, six out of the eight closest structural homologs to Csa2 were C. albicans FREs (Supplementary file 1). Alignment of the regions of homology showed that they correspond to the predicted extracellular N-termini of these FREs (Figure 6—figure supplement 1). Despite the low sequence homology between these proteins and Csa2, six of the eight canonical CFEM cysteine residues, forming three out of the four disulfide bonds in the CFEM structure, are nonetheless conserved and similarly spaced in the predicted FRE N-termini, and indeed are predicted to form disulfide bonds in the predicted structures (Figure 6—figure supplement 1). We next extended the sequence comparison to all other C. albicans FREs. Of the 12 FRE homologs that have an extended N-terminal domain (Figure 1—figure supplement 2), 10 have six cysteines with conserved CFEM alignment, whereas two have only four of the six cysteines conserved (Figure 6). An additional key residue of the CFEM domain, the heme iron-coordinating aspartic acid (Nasser et al., 2016), is conserved in four FREs and is replaced by asparagine in six others. Taken together, this analysis suggests that the substrate-binding N-terminal domain of fungal FREs assumes the CFEM fold.

Figure 6 with 2 supplements see all
Alignment by MAFFT (Katoh et al., 2005) of the N-termini of 12 FRE-like proteins.

The alignment with Csa2 was superimposed based on the structural alignment shown in Figure 6—figure supplement 1. The eight CFEM cysteines are highlighted in yellow and numbered below the sequence. The orange linkers connect between the cysteines that form disulfide bonds in the Csa2 structure. The Csa2 heme iron-coordinating Asp residue and its homologs in ferric reductases (FREs) are highlighted in green, and the corresponding Asn residues in blue.

Discussion

C. albicans can utilize external heme as both an iron source and a heme source, using an uptake system that depends on a group of related hemophores that contain a unique CFEM-type heme-binding domain (Moors et al., 1992; Nasser et al., 2016; Weissman et al., 2021). This pathway involves capture of the heme from host proteins by the CFEM hemophores, and its transfer from one hemophore to the next across the cell wall to the cell membrane (Kornitzer and Roy, 2020; Kuznets et al., 2014; Pinsky et al., 2020; Figure 7). While vacuolar function and the endocytic pathway were found to be essential for heme-iron utilization (Weissman et al., 2008), the mechanism for heme internalization into the cell was unknown. Here, we fill this gap, and identify a family of membrane proteins, previously classified as FREs based on sequence homology (Almeida et al., 2009; Baek et al., 2008), that are essential for heme uptake into the cell.

Proposed model for heme uptake in Candida albicans.

See Discussion for details.

FRP1 and FRP2 have been previously identified as genes that are highly induced under iron starvation conditions by the Hap43/Cap2-Sfu1 system, as well as under alkaline conditions by the Rim101 transcription factor (Baek et al., 2008; Bensen et al., 2004; Chen et al., 2011; Lan et al., 2004; Liang et al., 2009; Singh et al., 2011). Indeed, in some reports, FRP1 is the highest-induced gene under iron starvation conditions, together with the CFEM hemophore gene RBT5 (Lan et al., 2004). Here, we identified FRP1 and FRP2 by phylogenetic profiling as genes that co-segregate with CFEM hemophore genes across fungal genomes. The function of these genes was confirmed experimentally: we showed here that FRP1 is essential for heme uptake under all conditions tested, and that FRP2 contributes to heme uptake under alkaline conditions. Interestingly, a predicted FRE, CnFre2/CNAG_06821, was identified in the distantly related basidiomycete fungal pathogen C. neoformans, as being required for optimal growth on hemin as well (Saikia et al., 2014). However, unlike Frp1/2, CnFre2 is not required for sensitivity to toxic heme analogs (Saikia et al., 2014), and CnFre2’s N-terminal domain lacks the cysteine arrangement found in CFEM proteins and in C. albicans FRE N-terminal domains. It is thus unclear at this point whether CnFre2 and Frp1/2 share a common mechanism.

FRP1 and FRP2 are adjacent to, and share a promoter region with, the two CFEM protein genes PGA7 and CSA1, respectively. This synteny is maintained across most fungal genomes analyzed, further suggesting a common function in heme acquisition. We note however that while PGA7 was shown to be the main CFEM hemophore required for heme uptake under all conditions tested (Kuznets et al., 2014; Nasser et al., 2016), we have been unable so far to detect any phenotype in the csa1-/- deletion mutant, either alone or in combination with other CFEM gene mutants, in either regular or alkaline medium. Given the high homology of the Csa1 tandem CFEM domains to that of Rbt5 and other established hemophores, it is nonetheless likely that Csa1 does play a role in heme acquisition under conditions yet to be identified.

Regarding PGA7, beyond synteny with FRP1, the similar phenotype of the frp1-/- and the pga7-/- mutants in C. albicans and the effect of co-expression of FRP1 and PGA7 in S. cerevisiae indicated a close cooperation between these proteins in the heme uptake pathway. Furthermore, structure and sequence comparison between FREs, Frp1/2 and CFEM hemophores showed that while the Frp1/2 sequences align with the transmembrane and intracellular portions of the FREs, the CFEM hemophores sequences such as Pga7 are related to the N-terminal extracellular domain of the FREs (Figure 6—figure supplement 2). This suggests that the Frp-Pga7 complex is evolutionarily related to the main body and the N-terminal domain, respectively, of the FRE protein family. The predicted CFEM fold of the various FRE N-termini could, by analogy with the CFEM heme-binding platform (Nasser et al., 2016), form a binding site for the various types of substrates of these FREs around the conserved Asp/Asn.

The known role of FREs is to reduce ferric iron in order to extract it from chelates and siderophores (Philpott, 2006; Yun et al., 2000). The homology of Frp1/2 to FREs therefore begs the question: why would an FRE activity be required for heme uptake? A possible answer comes from the observation that the CFEM domain specifically binds Fe+3-heme (ferriheme), but not Fe+2-heme (ferroheme), thanks to its unusual Asp-mediated iron coordination (Nasser et al., 2016). This redox sensitivity of binding appears to be essential for the CFEM hemophore function, because mutant proteins carrying a substitution of the iron-coordination Asp with His can efficiently bind ferroheme as well as ferriheme, but these Asp-to-His mutants are completely inactive in vivo (Nasser et al., 2016). The homology of Frp1/2 to FREs and their role in heme acquisition therefore raise the possibility that they function as heme reductases, and that the Frp1/2 proteins reduce heme bound to the extracellular CFEM hemophores in order to release it.

If Frp1 and Frp2’s role is to release heme from Pga7 or other CFEM hemophores, what then is the protein that binds the released heme and mediates its internalization into the cell? An important clue for answering this question is the observation that Frp1 and Frp2 – but not Pga7 – mediate the uptake of metal-substituted heme analogs such as fluorescent ZnMP and the toxic metal-substituted PPIX derivatives. These metal-substituted analogs are either not at all redox-active, or much less so compared to heme, indicating that heme reduction cannot be the sole function of Frp1/2. Rather, these observations suggest that Frp1/2 function in the transport of these molecules into the cell as well. The location of Frp1/2 in the vacuole and their partial relocalization in the presence of hemin is consistent with a role of Frp1/2 as heme receptors shuttling between the plasma membrane and the vacuole (Figure 7).

An intriguing question is the reason for the existence of two distinct paralogs, Frp1 and Frp2, in C. albicans as well as in many fungal genomes containing FRP homologs. Whereas C. albicans Frp1 is essential for heme uptake under all the conditions we tested, Frp2 contributed to heme-iron utilization under alkaline conditions only. With regard to the roles of Frp1 and Frp2 in sensitivity to metal-substituted heme analogs, FRP1 was the main determinant of sensitivity in unbuffered YPD medium (pH ~ 6.5), except for GaPPIX where FRP2 played the dominant role, and FRP2 also played a role in ZnPPIX and MnPPIX sensitivity. At neutral-alkaline pH, the Frp2 contribution became more important yet. While differential expression of FRP1 and FRP2 might be invoked to explain some of these results, it does not explain differential phenotypes with different metal-substituted heme analogs under the same conditions. Furthermore, expression of FRP2 under the FRP1 promoter could not complement the frp1-/- mutant phenotype for heme uptake, indicating that the two proteins do have distinct functions. Localization of the GFP fusions of Frp1 and Frp2 indicated a similar distribution between vacuole and cell surface, with however a higher apparent concentration of Frp2 in the vacuole (Figure 4B and C). One possibility, relating to the Frp proteins’ activity as reductases, is that, since liganded iron was reported to be more readily reduced at more acidic pH (Dhungana and Crumbliss, 2005), combined activity of Frp1 and Frp2 might be required to reduce Pga7-bound heme at neutral and alkaline pH. Another possibility, relating to the Frp proteins’ function as heme receptors, is that the affinity of heme for Frp1 and Frp2 differs depending on pH. Differential requirement of Frp1 and Frp2 for the toxicity of specific metal-substituted protoporphyrins could similarly reflect differential affinity of these compounds to Frp1 and Frp2. A third possibility, which takes into account that Frp2 showed a higher relative concentration in the vacuole compared to Frp1 (Figure 4), is that Frp2 specifically plays a role, distinct from that of Frp1, in subcellular distribution of heme. Distinct roles for Frp1 and Frp2 in redistribution of imported heme between the vacuole and other compartments, and differential effects of pH on this process, might explain why Frp1 is functionally more important for heme-iron utilization even at alkaline pH (Figure 1) while Frp2 is more active in promoting heme influx into the cytoplasm (Figure 2).

To conclude, we have identified two FRE-related membrane proteins, Frp1 and Frp2, as the ‘missing link’ between the extracellular CFEM hemophore cascade and the intracellular heme endocytosis pathway to the vacuole. Our data suggest that these proteins could function both as heme reductases and as heme receptors that bring the heme from the cell surface into the cell (Figure 7). The Frp1/2 -CFEM hemophore pathway thus represent a new paradigm for heme uptake and utilization.

Materials and methods

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)WTFonzi and Irwin, 1993KC2=CAF3-1ura3Δ::imm434/ura3Δ::imm434
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)ccc2-/-Weissman et al., 2002KC68KC2 ccc2Δ::hisG/ccc2Δ::hisG
Strain, strain background (Candida. albicans)rbt5-/-Weissman and Kornitzer, 2004KC139KC68 rbt5Δ/rbt5Δ
Strain, strain background (Candida. albicans)pga7-/-Kuznets et al., 2014KC485KC68 pga7Δ/pga7Δ
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)WTFonzi and Irwin, 1993KC590=CAI4ura3Δ::imm434/ura3Δ::imm434
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)pga7-/-Kuznets et al., 2014KC646KC590 pga7Δ/pga7Δ ADE2/ade2::URA3
Strain, strain background (Candida. albicans)pga7-/- PGA7 URA3Kuznets et al., 2014KC647KC590 pga7Δ/pga7Δ ADE2/ade2::PGA7 URA3
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)pga7-/- URA3This workKC811KC68 ADE2/ade2::URA3
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)FRP1+/-This workKC859KC2 FRP1/frp1Δ
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)frp1-/-This workKC870KC2 frp1Δ/frp1Δ
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)FRP1+/-This workKC901KC2 FRP2/frp2Δ
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)frp2-/-This workKC912KC2 frp2Δ/frp2Δ
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)frp2-/-This workKC913KC68 frp2Δ/frp2Δ
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)FRP1-GFPThis workKC914KC2 FRP1/FRP1-GFP URA3
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)FRP1-GFPThis workKC916KC2 frp1Δ/FRP1-GFP URA3
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)frp1-/-This workKC923KC68 frp1Δ/frp1Δ
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)frp1-/-This workKC966KC590 frp1Δ/frp1Δ
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)frp1-/- URA3This workKC1023KC870 ADE2/ade2::URA3
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)frp1-/- FRP1 URA3This workKC1024KC870 ADE2/ade2::FRP1 URA3
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)frp2-/-This workKC1053KC590 frp2Δ/frp2Δ
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)frp1-/- frp2-/-This workKC1061KC590 frp1Δ/frp1D frp2Δ/frp2Δ
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)frp1-/- FRP1p-FRP2This workKC1064KC870 ADE2/ade2::FRP1p-FRP2 URA3
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)SSB1p-FRP1This workKC1080KC870 ADE2/ade2::SSB1p-FRP1 URA3
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)frp1-/- URA3This workKC1146KC923 ADE2/ade2::URA3
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)SSB1p-FRP2This workKC1244KC912 ADE2/ade2::SSB1p-FRP2 URA3
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)FRP2-GFPThis workKC1245KC912 frp2Δ/FRP2-GFP URA3
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)frp2-/- URA3This workKC1246KC912 ADE2/ade2::URA3
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)frp2-/- FRP2 URA3This workKC1379KC912 ADE2/ade2::FRP2 URA3
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)FRP2-GFPThis workKC1405KC2 FRP2/FRP2-GFP URA3
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)frp1-/- frp2-/-This workKC1410KC2 frp1Δ/frp1D frp2Δ/frp2Δ
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)frp2-/- FRP2 URA3This workKC1411KC913 ADE2/ade2::FRP2 URA3
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)frp2-/- URA3This workKC1412KC923 frp2Δ/frp2Δ::hisG-URA3-hisG
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)frp2-/- URA3This workKC1414KC913 ADE2/ade2::URA3
Strain, strain background (Candida albicans)frp2-/- FRP1p-FRP2This workKC1447KC912 ADE2/ade2:: FRP1p-FRP2 URA3
Strain, strain background (Sandida cerevisiae)hem1This workKY1498ura3-1 can1-100 GAL+leu2-3,112 trp1-1 ade2-1 his3-11,15 hem1Δ::KanMX
AntibodyAnti-GFP (Rabbit polyclonal)AbcamCat # ab290Use at 1:5000
AntibodyAnti-rabbit IgG, HRP-conjugated (Goat polyclonal)SigmaCat # A9169Use at 1:5000
Recombinant DNA reagentFRP1 blaster plasmidsThis workKB2392
KC2393
Digest SacI-KpnI for transformation
Recombinant DNA reagentFRP2 blaster plasmidsThis workKB2395
KB2396
Digest SacI-KpnI for transformation
Recombinant DNA reagentFRP1 reintegrantThis workKB2546Contains the FRP1 region from –395 to +1877
Recombinant DNA reagentFRP2 reintegrantThis workKB2576Contains the FRP2 region from –895 to +1982
Recombinant DNA reagentFRP1-GFPThis workKB2431Contains FRP1 (+3 to+1662) fused to eGFP
Recombinant DNA reagentFRP2-GFPThis workKB2695Contains FRP2 (–969 to +1776) fused to eGFP
Recombinant DNA reagentFRP1p-FRP2This workKB2575Contains the FRP1 promoter (−395 to –1) fused to the FRP2 (+1 to +1878)
Recombinant DNA reagentSSB1p-FRP1This workKB2450Contains FRP1 (–2 to +1826) under SSB1 promoter (−400 to –1)
Recombinant DNA reagentSSB1p-FRP2This workKB2696Contains FRP2 (–3 to +1933) under SSB1 promoter (−400 to –1)
Recombinant DNA reagentPGA7 FRP1This workKB2566H2Ap-PGA7, H2Bp-FRP1 codon corrected
Recombinant DNA reagentFRP1This workKB2569H2Bp-FRP1 codon corrected
Recombinant DNA reagentPGA7This workKB2789H2Ap-PGA7
Sequence-based reagentFRP1 codon-correctedThis workB35984-1/M131416FRP1 codon-corrected in pUC57
Sequence-based reagentSacI-FRP1 5’ (–795)This workPCR primer 1503GCGAGCTCCCAGCAGCACTTCCTG
Sequence-based reagentFRP1 5’ (–1) – SpeIThis workPCR primer 1504ggactaGTTGAAAGTTAAACTTGGTTA
Sequence-based reagentHindIII-FRP1 3’ (+1662)This workPCR primer
1505
GGGAAGCTTAGGGTATATAGGATAAAT
Sequence-based reagentFRP1 3’ (+2258) - KpnIThis workPCR primer 1506gcggtACCCAAATGCATGGGTAAAC
Sequence-based reagentFRP1 test (–810)This workPCR primer 1507CACTTGCACTACCAGTTTCG
Sequence-based reagentSacI-FRP2 5’ (–730)This workPCR primer 1508GGGAGCTCGGAAAATAAGTTGTTCTTTG
Sequence-based reagentFRP2 5’ (+3) – SpeIThis workPCR primer 1509CGACTAGTCCATGGCTGATAAGTTG
Sequence-based reagentHindIII-FRP2 3’ (+1753)This workPCR primer 1510GGGAAGCTTCTATAACGAGTCGTACGA
Sequence-based reagentFRP2 3’ (+2394) – KpnIThis workPCR primer 1511CCGGTACCTGATCCTTGGATGCCA
Sequence-based reagentFRP2 test (–750)This workPCR primer 1512GTAACAAACCCGAGAACACC
Sequence-based reagentRI-FRP1This workPCR primer 1513CCGAATTCAACCATGGCTATTCCAT
Sequence-based reagentFRP1(+1740)-XhoIThis workPCR primer 1514cgctcgaGGTGTGTCCTTACGTACAG
Sequence-based reagentRI-FRP2This workPCR primer 1515gcGAATTCCATGGACGAAGAACTTCAG
Sequence-based reagentFRP2 (+1872)-XhoIThis workPCR primer 1516ggctcGAGAGTGCTGTGAGGTTATG
Sequence-based reagentBamHI-FRP1(+3)This workPCR primer 1522gcggatccgctattccatttgatcaacag
Sequence-based reagentFRP1(+1662)-XhoIThis workPCR primer 1523cgctcgagaaacgactctgtataacaatac
Sequence-based reagentSpeI-FRP1 5' (–395)This workPCR primer 1541ccACTAGTCGTAATCAGCAGCAGATAC
Sequence-based reagentFRP1 3' (+1877) - KpnIThis workPCR primer 1542ccGGTACCGCACAAGCGGGTACT
Sequence-based reagentFRP1 (+1550)-XhoIThis workPCR primer 1543GGCTCGAGTTTGTGAATGATGGCGA
Sequence-based reagentPGA7 (+1087)-HindIIIThis workPCR primer 1544GCAAGCTTGGCATACTCAATTTGATG
Sequence-based reagent5’-F1HEM1This workPCR primerCCCTCAATAATCATAACAGTACTTAGGTTTTTTTTTCAGTCGGATCCCCGGGTTAATTAA
Sequence-based reagent3’-R1HEM1This workPCR primerCCTTGTACCTCTATCTCAGCCCATGCATATATTGGTTGTTGAATTCGAGCTCGTTTAAAC
Sequence-based reagentPromoter 5’ (HTA2)This workPCR primerTATATATTAAATTTGCTCTTGTTC
Sequence-based reagentPromoter 3’ (HTB2)This workPCR primerTAGTTGTAGAGTAAGTTGTTG
Sequence-based reagentSacI-HTB2p –684This workPCR primergcgaGCTCTTGTTCTGTACTTTCC
Sequence-based reagentPGA7 5’This workPCR primerGAACAAGAGCAAATTTAATATATAATGCATTTCATATTCTACTTGA
Sequence-based reagentPga7-SacI (+697)This workPCR primerPga7-SacI (+697)
Sequence-based reagentFRP1 5’This workPCR primerCAACAACTTACTCTACAACTAATGGCTATTCCATTTGATCAA
Sequence-based reagentFRP1-SalIThis workPCR primerCcccgtcgacggtatcga
Chemical compound, drugHeminFrontier ScientificH651-9Hemin chloride
Chemical compound, drugBovine hemoglobinSigma-AldrichH2500
Chemical compound, drugFerrozineSigma-AldrichP97623-(2-Pyridyl)–5,6-diphenyl-1,2,4-triazine-4’,4”-disulfonic acid sodium salt
Chemical compound, drugBPSSigma-AldrichB1375Bathophenanthroline sulfonate
Chemical compound, drugALAMerck08339δ-Aminolevulinic acid
Chemical compound, drugGaPPIXFrontier ScientificP40167Ga3+-protoporphyrin IX chloride
Chemical compound, drugCoPPIXFrontier ScientificCo654-9Co3+-protoporphyrin IX chloride
Chemical compound, drugMnPPIXFrontier ScientificMnP562-9Mn3+-protoporphyrin IX chloride
Chemical compound, drugZnPPIXFrontier ScientificZn625-9Zn2+-protoporphyrin IX
Chemical compound, drugZnMPChem-CruzSc-396862Zn2+-mesoporphyrin
OtherAlignment summary of 40 saccharomycetales species for phylogenetic profilingThis workgithub.com/BKU-Technion/FRP

Media and chemicals

Request a detailed protocol

Cells were grown in YPD medium (1% yeast extract, 2% bacto-peptone, 2% glucose, tryptophan 150 mg/l) or in Synthetic Complete (SC) medium lacking specific amino acids, as indicated. SC medium contains, per liter, Yeast Nitrogen Base (USBiological) 1.7 g, (NH4)2SO4 5 g, the 20 amino acids, adenine and uridine, 0.1 g each except leucine, 0.2 g, glucose 20 g, and 0.2 mM inositol. YPD pH 7.5 or pH 8.5 were made by adding 0.1 M Tris-Cl from a 1 M stock of appropriate pH. Media were supplemented with the iron chelators ferrozine or BPS (Sigma) at 1 mM, hemin as indicated from a 2 mM stock in 50 mM NaOH, or bovine hemoglobin from a 0.5 mM stock in phosphate-buffered saline (Dulbecco’s PBS; Biological Industries, Israel). ALA (Merck) was added to 50 μg/ml in the medium to maintain the hem1 cells. Hemin, Ga3+-protoporphyrin IX, Co3+-protoporphyrin IX, Mn3+-protoporphyrin IX, Zn2+-protoporphyrin IX, and ZnMP were obtained from Frontier Scientific, and bovine hemoglobin from Sigma (H2500). ZnMP was added from a 6 mM stock made fresh in 10% ethanolamine, and Ga3+-protoporphyrin IX, Co3+-protoporphyrin IX, Mn3+-protoporphyrin IX, Zn2+-protoporphyrin IX were added from a 50 mM stock made fresh in DMSO.

Strains and plasmids

Request a detailed protocol

Candida albicans strains used are listed in Table 1. The FRP1 and FRP2 ‘blaster’ deletion plasmids, KB2392, -3 and KB2395, -6 were built by introducing 500 nt adjacent to the 5’ and 3’ ends of each gene into plasmids KB985 and KB986 (Atir-Lande et al., 2005). They were used to build strains KC859, KC870, KC901, KC912, KC913, KC923, KC966, KC1053, KC1061, KC1410, KC1412. KB2546 contains the FRP1 region (from –395 to +1877) cloned SpeI-KpnI into BES116 (Feng et al., 1999). It was used to make the FRP1 reintegrant strain KC1024. KB2576 contains the FRP2 region (from –895 to +1982) cloned SpeI-ApaI into BES116. It was used to make the FRP2 reintegrant strains KC1379, 1411. Vector BES116 was used to make strains KC811, 1023, 1146, 1246, 1414. KB2431 contains FRP1 (+3 to +1662, BamHI-XhoI) and KB2695 contains FRP2 (–969 to +1776, SpeI-XhoI) fused to the eGFP sequence of KB2430 (Bar-Yosef et al., 2018). They were used to construct KC914+KC916 and KC1245+KC1405, respectively. KC2575 contains the FRP1 promoter (−395 to –1) cloned in BES116 and then fused to the FRP2 open reading frame and 3’ region (+1 to +1878). It was used to make KC1064, KC1447. KB2450 and KB2696, containing FRP1 (–2 to +1826) and FRP2 (–3 to +1933), respectively, cloned SpeI-KpnI in KB2448, were used to make KC1080 and KC1244, respectively. KB2448 is BES116 with the SSB1 promoter region (−400 to –1) cloned NotI-SpeI. S. cerevisiae strain KY1498 is ura3-1 can1-100 GAL+leu2-3,112 trp1-1 ade2-1 his3-11,15 hem1Δ::KanMX. It was constructed by transforming strain W303-1A (Wallis et al., 1989) with a KanMX marker amplified from pFA6-kanMX6 (Longtine et al., 1998) using primers with 40 bp homology at each end to HEM1 adjacent sequences. To express FRP1 and PGA7 in S. cerevisiae, we first ordered a synthetic version of the FRP1 coding sequence (Hy-labs, Rehovot, Israel) with all ambiguous CTG codons changed to other leucine codons. We then amplified this gene, PGA7, and the promoter region located between the 5’ ends of the adjacent S. cerevisiae histone genes HTA2 and HTB2. Fusion PCR was used to fuse the three fragments, which were then cloned SacI-SalI in the vector p413GAL1 (Mumberg et al., 1994) (removing the GAL1 promoter) to generate KB2566. The HTA2-HTB2 promoter fragment was also fused to FRP1 alone and cloned likewise to generate KB2569. To generate KB2789, FRP1 was removed from KB2566 by digestion with EcoRV-NcoI, filling in and re-ligation.

Table 1
List of Candida albicans strains.
NameGenotypeOrigin
 KC2=CAF3-1ura3Δ::imm434/ura3Δ::imm434Fonzi and Irwin, 1993
 KC68KC2 ccc2Δ::hisG/ccc2Δ::hisGWeissman et al., 2002
 KC139KC68 rbt5Δ/rbt5ΔWeissman and Kornitzer, 2004
 KC485KC68 pga7Δ/pga7ΔKuznets et al., 2014
 KC590=CAI4ura3Δ::imm434/ura3Δ::imm434Fonzi and Irwin, 1993
 KC646KC590 pga7Δ/pga7Δ ADE2/ade2::URA3Kuznets et al., 2014
 KC647KC590 pga7Δ/pga7Δ ADE2/ade2::PGA7 URA3Kuznets et al., 2014
 KC811KC68 ADE2/ade2::URA3This work
 KC859KC2 FRP1/frp1ΔThis work
 KC870KC2 frp1Δ/frp1ΔThis work
 KC901KC2 FRP2/frp2ΔThis work
 KC912KC2 frp2Δ/frp2ΔThis work
 KC913KC68 frp2Δ/frp2ΔThis work
 KC914KC2 FRP1/FRP1-GFP URA3This work
 KC916KC2 frp1Δ/FRP1-GFP URA3This work
 KC923KC68 frp1Δ/frp1ΔThis work
 KC966KC590 frp1Δ/frp1ΔThis work
 KC1023KC870 ADE2/ade2::URA3This work
 KC1024KC870 ADE2/ade2::FRP1 URA3This work
 KC1053KC590 frp2Δ/frp2ΔThis work
 KC1061KC590 frp1Δ/frp1Δ frp2Δ/frp2ΔThis work
 KC1064KC870 ADE2/ade2::FRP1p-FRP2 URA3This work
 KC1080KC870 ADE2/ade2::SSB1p-FRP1 URA3This work
 KC1146KC923 ADE2/ade2::URA3This work
 KC1244KC912 ADE2/ade2::SSB1p-FRP2 URA3This work
 KC1245KC912 frp2Δ/FRP2-GFP URA3This work
 KC1246KC912 ADE2/ade2::URA3This work
 KC1379KC912 ADE2/ade2::FRP2 URA3This work
 KC1405KC2 FRP2/FRP2-GFP URA3This work
 KC1410KC2 frp1Δ/frp1Δ frp2Δ/frp2ΔThis work
 KC1411KC913 ADE2/ade2::FRP2 URA3This work
 KC1412KC923 frp2Δ/frp2Δ::hisG-URA3-hisGThis work
 KC1414KC913 ADE2/ade2::URA3This work
 KC1447KC912 ADE2/ade2:: FRP1p-FRP2 URA3This work

Growth assays

Request a detailed protocol

For hemoglobin utilization, overnight cultures grown in YPD were diluted in the morning into a series of twofold dilutions of hemoglobin in YPD+ferrozine or BPS. Cells were inoculated in flat-bottomed 96-well plates at OD600=0.00001, 150 µl per well. Plates were incubated at 30°C on an orbital shaker at 60 rpm and growth was measured by optical density (OD600) after 2 and 3 days with an ELISA reader. Cells were resuspended with a multi-pipettor before each reading. Each culture was done in triplicate. For MPP sensitivity, cells were inoculated in flat-bottomed 96-well plates in YPD+1 mM ferrozine at OD600=0.0001, 150 µl per well. Plates were incubated at 30°C on an orbital shaker at 60 rpm and growth was measured by optical density (OD600) after 2 days with an ELISA reader. All experiments shown were performed more than once with similar results. The heme-iron utilization phenotypes were tested in different background strains (CCC2+/+, ccc2-/-) with similar results.

Heme sensor-binding assays

Request a detailed protocol

The protocol was as described (Weissman et al., 2021). Briefly, each strain to be tested was transformed with the sensor plasmids KB2636 (WT HS1), KB2669 (M7A), as well as a vector plasmid. Overnight cultures were diluted to OD 600 = 0.2 and grown for 4 hr in the indicated hemin concentrations. For fluorescence measurements, cells were pelleted, washed once with PBS, resuspended to OD 600 = 5, and 0.2 ml were placed in duplicate in a black 96-well flat-bottom plates (Nunc Fluorotrac). Fluorescence was measured with a Tecan infinite 200 Pro reader, with eGFP: ex. 480 nm (9 nm bandwidth), em. 520 nm (20 nm bandwidth), and mKATE2 ex. 588 nm (9 nm bandwidth), em. 620 nm (20 nm bandwidth). Each strain was represented by three independent cultures, and each culture was measured twice (technical duplicate), the vector-only culture reading was substracted from all other readings, and the ratio of eGFP to mKATE2 was calculated. The experiment shown was preceded by four experiments with different strain combinations and media, all showing reduced heme intake in the frp1-/- and frp2-/- mutants compared to the wild-type. Statistical analysis: To test the effect of genotype and hemin concentration on the ratio, we used two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference test, which controls for multiple comparisons. For each clone we report the results of pairwise comparisons between each hemin concentration and no hemin. The analysis was performed using R.

Microscopy

Request a detailed protocol

Cells were imaged with a Zeiss Axioskop Imager epifluorescence microscope equipped with DIC optics, using a ×100 objective. For visualizing Frp1-GFP and Frp2-GFP, the GFP filter set was used with an exposure time of 6 s. Cells were inoculated a day before in YPD medium to reach late-log phase (OD600 = 5–8) in the morning before induction. For quantitation of subcellular localization, at least 100 cells were scored for each datapoint and each cell was given a score between 0 and 3 for each location. The scoring was done blind, on pictures taken by a different operator and given an arbitrary coding. The experiment shown was performed after a preliminary experiment with fewer timepoints that yielded similar results.

ZnMP uptake: Cells were grown overnight under iron starvation (YPD+1 mM ferrozine). The next morning cells were diluted 1:50 in 5 ml of the same medium and grown for 3–4 hr. One μM ZnMP was added. Samples were taken after 10 min and spun down for 10 s at maximum speed. The supernatant was removed, and the pellet was once washed with 1 ml of ice-cold 2% BSA in PBS, then resuspended in 30 µl ice- cold 2% BSA in PBS. For visualizing ZnMP by epifluorescence microscopy, the rhodamine filter was used with an exposure time of 10 s.

CMAC vacuolar stain: CMAC was added to a logarithmically growing culture to 5 μM final from a 10 mM stock solution in DMSO and the cells were incubated a further 30 min at 30°C prior to microscopy visualization. For visualizing CMAC by epifluorescence microscopy, the DAPI filter was used with an exposure time of 700 ms.

Hoechst 33342 nuclear stain: Hoechst 33342 was added to a logarithmically growing culture to 10 μg/ml from a 1 mg/ml stock in water and the cells were incubated a further 30 min at 30°C prior to microscopy visualization. For visualizing Hoechst 33342 by epifluorescence microscopy, the DAPI filter was used with an exposure time of 1 s.

Protein analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Protein extracts were obtained by resuspending three OD600 of cells in 120 μM of protein loading buffer, mixing the suspension with glass beads and shaking the suspension in a bead-beater (Next Advance Bullet Blender 24) for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatants were heated to 37°C for 5 min and loaded on Bio-Rad 4–20% pre-cast mini-gels. After Western transfer, the membranes were reacted with a rabbit anti-GFP polyclonal antibody (Abcam ab290) and with an anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Sigma A9169). Luminescence signals were visualized with a Vilber Fusion FX Spectra imager.

Phylogenetic profiling

Request a detailed protocol

Building the profiles: we performed a BLAST search (tblastn) with all C. albicans proteins as query and 40 Saccharomycotina genomes (reflecting 40 species) downloaded from the Joint Genome Institute site (https://mycocosm.jgi.doe.gov/mycocosm/home) and the Candida Genome Database site (http://www.candidagenome.org/) in May 2015. An alignment summary of each C. albicans protein with each of the 40 other species can be downloaded from https://github.com/BKU-Technion/FRP; BKU-Technion, 2022. For each protein we recorded the best score in each genome. We first looked at the profiles of Pga7/Rbt5/Csa2 and found that they are detectable in nine species out of this set of 40, including the more distant Blastobotrys (Arxula) adeninivorans and Trichomonascus petasosporus but excluding the more closely related Candida guilliermondii. We next looked at patterns of conservation of homologous proteins that mirror those of the CFEM proteins, that is, that are present in all nine species containing CFEM proteins and absent from all other genomes. Only Frp1/2 fulfilled this condition, that is, presence in the nine species containing Pga7/Rbt5/Csa2 homologs and absence in the other species, including C. guilliermondii.

Materials availability statement

Request a detailed protocol

All strains and all plasmids are available upon request with no restrictions.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. A sequence alignment summary file used for phylogenetic profiling analysis is available on Github at https://github.com/BKU-Technion/FRP, (copy archived at swh:1:rev:5de8de2829b273b0ec4b5741b15061fd27c27231).

References

    1. Ganz T
    (2018) Iron and infection
    International Journal of Hematology 107:7–15.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-017-2366-2
    1. Kornitzer D
    2. Roy U
    (2020) Pathways of heme utilization in fungi
    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. Molecular Cell Research 1867:118817.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2020.118817

Decision letter

  1. Arturo Casadevall
    Senior and Reviewing Editor; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States
  2. Valeria C Culotta
    Reviewer; Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States

Our editorial process produces two outputs: (i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; (ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Ferric reductase-related proteins mediate fungal heme acquisition" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 2 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Arturo Casadevall as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in the review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Valeria C Culotta (Reviewer #1).

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions:

1) Please address the issues raised by Reviewers 1 and 2.

2) Reviewer 2 raised the question of the direct transfer of heme from Pga7 to Frp1. We all agree that this would be very important issue if it could be addressed. However, we recognize that it would require a considerable amount of new work and we are not requiring it. That said, anything you could do to address this point would strengthen the manuscript.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

Suggestions for improvement:

1) There appears to be a discrepancy in results with Figure 1 and Figure 2. In Figure 1, Frp1 is clearly dominant for utilization of heme as an Fe source at both pH. In Figure 2, Frp2 is dominant for heme uptake by the sensor, although studies were only conducted at neutral pH. These apparent discrepancies are not a simple matter of pH because, in Fig, 1, Frp1 is still dominant at neutral pH. Could there be two functions, ie., heme utilization where Frp1 is dominant and secondly, heme uptake where Frp2 is dominant? This should be discussed.

2) Statistics are needed for the graphs of Figure 4B and Figure 5B. In Figure 4B, 100 cells were counted. Was that from one experimental trial, explaining why no error bars?

3) Figure 1C – the data with pga7 is impossible to see. Is there a way to change the icon size so that pga7 is visible together with frp1?

4) In the sentence: The reduced increase in sensor occupancy in the frp2-/- mutant exposed to external hemin compared to the frp1-/- mutant is consistent with the growth data obtained at pH 8.5 (Figure 2), Shouldn't this be Figure 1 since Figure 1 is the growth data?

5) The vacuolar signal of the GFP proteins looks luminal. If the authors think this is degraded Frp1 and Frp2, they should mention this.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

The manuscript is very clearly written and the experiments are presented in a very deliberate sequence that makes for a very clear set of studies. The only question I would like to see addressed is whether there is a direct transfer of heme from Pga7 to Frp1. The authors suggest that reduction of the bound heme could affect its release and that implies that the reductase has direct interaction with the heme bound on Pga7. Perhaps proximity labeling or proximity ligation approaches could be used to answer this question. An argument could be made that these studies are complete without this question being mechanistically addressed.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80604.sa1

Author response

Essential revisions:

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

Suggestions for improvement:

1) There appears to be a discrepancy in results with Figure 1 and Figure 2. In Figure 1, Frp1 is clearly dominant for utilization of heme as an Fe source at both pH. In Figure 2, Frp2 is dominant for heme uptake by the sensor, although studies were only conducted at neutral pH. These apparent discrepancies are not a simple matter of pH because, in Fig, 1, Frp1 is still dominant at neutral pH. Could there be two functions, ie., heme utilization where Frp1 is dominant and secondly, heme uptake where Frp2 is dominant? This should be discussed.

Thank you for pointing this out. Indeed, Frp2 appears to be more dominant in the sensor assay (heme uptake) but is less dominant in the growth assays (heme utilization). We have rewritten the description of the experiment (lines 208-210 in the revision), and added a possible explanation for the discrepancy in the Discussion (lines 440-445).

2) Statistics are needed for the graphs of Figure 4B and Figure 5B. In Figure 4B, 100 cells were counted. Was that from one experimental trial, explaining why no error bars?

Regarding Figure 4B, preliminary experiments had consistently show cell surface relocalization of the Frp proteins in the presence of hemin or hemoglobin. In the experiment shown, this relocalization was quantitated, and a parallel experiment, identical to the one we showed except that the cells were exposed to hemin rather than to hemoglobin, showed very similar kinetics of cell surface relocalization of the signal and concomitant decrease in ER signal. However, in the course of testing the nature of the vacuolar Frp1/2-GFP signals as prompted by comment #5, we found that, while the shift of the GFP signal to the cell surface was robustly reproducible, the decrease in ER signal was not. This might be due to a different induction regime: rather than using cultures that had already been grown overnight under iron limitation, as we had in previous experiments, in the new experiments we shifted log-phase cells growing in YPD to iron-limited medium, in order to monitor induction from a low expression baseline. In any case, increase in cell surface signal is not always accompanied by decrease in the ER signal. We have thus modified the text accordingly. New panels B and C of Figure 4 show induction of Frp1 and Frp2-GFP without and with hemin, and kinetics of appearance of the signal on the cell surface, respectively. (The new experiments uniformly use hemin rather than hemoglobin, since previous experiments indicated that both compounds induce similar changes in Frp1 and Frp2 subcellular distribution).

Regarding statistics, for the graphs in Figure 4C and Figure 5B, we have now added asterisks indicating statistically significant differences from time 0’ and from vector control, respectively.

3) Figure 1C – the data with pga7 is impossible to see. Is there a way to change the icon size so that pga7 is visible together with frp1?

Thanks – we have made the pga7 icon bigger so that it is now visible in all graphs.

4) In the sentence: The reduced increase in sensor occupancy in the frp2-/- mutant exposed to external hemin compared to the frp1-/- mutant is consistent with the growth data obtained at pH 8.5 (Figure 2), Shouldn't this be Figure 1 since Figure 1 is the growth data?

Indeed. Fixed, thanks.

5) The vacuolar signal of the GFP proteins looks luminal. If the authors think this is degraded Frp1 and Frp2, they should mention this.

Thanks for bringing this up. We had indeed assumed that the luminal signal represented remnants of the Frp1-GFP and Frp2-GFP proteins, the GFP moiety being notoriously slower to degrade in the vacuole. However, this comment prompted us to test this notion directly by Western blotting. As can be seen in new Figure 4 —figure supplement 2, only the full-length fusion proteins are detectable by Western. This is true whether in the presence of hemin, where more of the signal is on the cell surface, or in its absence, where the vacuolar signal is more prominent, or whether upon shifting the induced cells to iron satiety, which causes degradation of the fusion proteins. This suggests that there is no accumulation of GFP degradation fragments in the cell, and that all the visible GFP signal represents full-length, potentially active protein.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

The manuscript is very clearly written and the experiments are presented in a very deliberate sequence that makes for a very clear set of studies. The only question I would like to see addressed is whether there is a direct transfer of heme from Pga7 to Frp1. The authors suggest that reduction of the bound heme could affect its release and that implies that the reductase has direct interaction with the heme bound on Pga7. Perhaps proximity labeling or proximity ligation approaches could be used to answer this question. An argument could be made that these studies are complete without this question being mechanistically addressed.

Thank you. We couldn’t agree more regarding the importance of the questions raised by the reviewer. These questions form a main section of our current research program. Regarding interaction between Frp1 and Pga7 – which could be transient –, we have already attempted co-i.p. of the proteins with or without crosslinking – so far without success. Proximity labeling is something we hadn’t considered, we will now. Regarding direct heme transfer from the CFEM hemophores to Frp1/2, demonstrating such a transfer is technically much more challenging than showing heme transfer between the CFEM hemophores, because Frp1/2 are not soluble proteins, and because they already contain two catalytic hemes in their transmembrane domain. Therefore, we are currently focusing on identifying the heme receptor site on Frp1, and, with collaborators, on demonstrating the predicted heme reductase activity of Frp1/2.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80604.sa2

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Udita Roy

    Department of Molecular Microbiology, B. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
    Contribution
    Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  2. Shir Yaish

    Department of Molecular Microbiology, B. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
    Contribution
    Investigation, Visualization, Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  3. Ziva Weissman

    Department of Molecular Microbiology, B. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
    Contribution
    Supervision, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  4. Mariel Pinsky

    Department of Molecular Microbiology, B. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
    Contribution
    Investigation, Visualization
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  5. Sunanda Dey

    Department of Molecular Microbiology, B. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  6. Guy Horev

    Bioinformatics Knowledge Unit, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
    Contribution
    Software, Formal analysis
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  7. Daniel Kornitzer

    Department of Molecular Microbiology, B. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing
    For correspondence
    danielk@technion.ac.il
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5062-2735

Funding

Israel Science Foundation (587/19)

  • Daniel Kornitzer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank J Becker (U of Tennessee) for strain KC590, and Sara Selig for critical reading of the manuscript. This study was supported by ISF grant 587/19 to DK.

Senior and Reviewing Editor

  1. Arturo Casadevall, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States

Reviewer

  1. Valeria C Culotta, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States

Publication history

  1. Preprint posted: May 25, 2022 (view preprint)
  2. Received: May 26, 2022
  3. Accepted: October 5, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: October 6, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: November 4, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Roy et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 798
    Page views
  • 150
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Udita Roy
  2. Shir Yaish
  3. Ziva Weissman
  4. Mariel Pinsky
  5. Sunanda Dey
  6. Guy Horev
  7. Daniel Kornitzer
(2022)
Ferric reductase-related proteins mediate fungal heme acquisition
eLife 11:e80604.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80604

Further reading

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Lucy Chou-Zheng, Asma Hatoum-Aslan
    Research Advance

    CRISPR-Cas systems are a family of adaptive immune systems that use small CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) nucleases to protect prokaryotes from invading plasmids and viruses (i.e. phages). Type III systems launch a multi-layered immune response that relies upon both Cas and non-Cas cellular nucleases, and although the functions of Cas components have been well described, the identities and roles of non-Cas participants remain poorly understood. Previously, we showed that the Type III-A CRISPR-Cas system in Staphylococcus epidermidis employs two degradosome-associated nucleases, PNPase and RNase J2, to promote crRNA maturation and eliminate invading nucleic acids (Chou-Zheng and Hatoum-Aslan, 2019). Here, we identify RNase R as a third 'housekeeping' nuclease critical for immunity. We show that RNase R works in concert with PNPase to complete crRNA maturation, and identify specific interactions with Csm5, a member of the Type III effector complex, which facilitate nuclease recruitment/stimulation. Further, we demonstrate that RNase R and PNPase are required to maintain robust anti-plasmid immunity, particularly when targeted transcripts are sparse. Altogether, our findings expand the known repertoire of accessory nucleases required for Type III immunity and highlight the remarkable capacity of these systems to interface with diverse cellular pathways to ensure successful defense.

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Cecile Berne, Sebastien Zappa, Yves V Brun
    Research Article

    In their natural environment, most bacteria preferentially live as complex surface-attached multicellular colonies called biofilms. Biofilms begin with a few cells adhering to a surface, where they multiply to form a mature colony. When conditions deteriorate, cells can leave the biofilm. This dispersion is thought to be an important process that modifies the overall biofilm architecture and that promotes colonization of new environments. In Caulobacter crescentus biofilms, extracellular DNA (eDNA) is released upon cell death and prevents newborn cells from joining the established biofilm. Thus, eDNA promotes the dispersal of newborn cells and the subsequent colonization of new environments. These observations suggest that eDNA is a cue for sensing detrimental environmental conditions in the biofilm. Here we show that the toxin-antitoxin system (TAS) ParDE4 stimulates cell death in areas of a biofilm with decreased O2 availability. In conditions where O2 availability is low, eDNA concentration is correlated with cell death. Cell dispersal away from biofilms is decreased when parDE4 is deleted, probably due to the lower local eDNA concentration. Expression of parDE4 is positively regulated by O2 and the expression of this operon is decreased in biofilms where O2 availability is low. Thus, a programmed cell death mechanism using an O2-regulated TAS stimulates dispersal away from areas of a biofilm with decreased O2 availability and favors colonization of a new, more hospitable environment.