The millimeter-scale freshwater polyp Hydra with its simple tube-like body structure (Figure 1A) and stereotypic movement patterns is a popular biological model organism for immunology (Bosch and McFall-Ngai, 2021; Bosch, 2014; Bosch, 2013; Klimovich and Bosch, 2018a; Schröder and Bosch, 2016), developmental and evolutionary biology, and neurobiology (Klimovich and Bosch, 2018a; Bosch et al., 2017). Despite Hydra’s relevance for fundamental research, one of the animal’s most salient behaviors remains a mystery since its first description in 1744 (Bayer et al., 1744): it is unclear why Hydra undergoes recurrent full-body contraction-relaxation cycles, approximately one every 10–30 min (Figure 1B), while attached to the substratum. Most, if not all, animals exhibit such spontaneous contractions of muscular organs and body walls to pump internal fluids, create mixing flows, feed, locomote, or clean surfaces (Schierwater et al., 1991; Kremien et al., 2013; Trojanowski et al., 2016; Rich, 2018; Kornder et al., 2022). Other animals perform rhythmic pulsations, which differ from spontaneous contractions by occurring in predictable intervals and usually serve similar functions. For example, rhythmic pulsation of tentacles in corals, first noted by Lamarck nearly 200 years ago, lead to increased turbulent mixing, which enhances photosynthesis via fast removal of excess oxygen and prevents refiltration of surrounding water by neighboring polyps (Kremien et al., 2013). However, Hydra’s size, morphology, and spontaneous contraction characteristics do not fit any of the known functions of rhythmic or spontaneous contractions. In particular, Hydra’s small dimensions likely prevent it from the generation of turbulent mixing (Purcell, 1977). Here, we sought to investigate the functional underpinnings of Hydra’s spontaneous contractions from a fluid mechanics perspective. We hypothesized that the spontaneous contractions might generate fluid transport patterns of relevance to Hydra’s microbial partners that colonize the so-called glycocalyx on the outer body wall (Schröder and Bosch, 2016; Fraune et al., 2015; Figure 1C). Typically, the composition and distribution of symbiotic microbial communities residing at solid–liquid interfaces, such as in the gut and lung, are regulated both by interaction with host cells and by the properties of the fluid medium (Fang et al., 2021; Franzenburg et al., 2013). Therefore, we asked whether Hydra’s microbiome might be influenced by fluid flow associated with spontaneous contractions.

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

First, we mapped the abundance and distribution of microbiota that reside on the glycocalyx (Figure 1C and D). The glycocalyx is a multilayered extracellular cuticle covering Hydra’s ectodermal epithelial cells, has mucus-like properties, and shapes the microbiome by providing food and antimicrobial peptides (Franzenburg et al., 2013). Regional differences in the glycocalyx have not been reported; however, using 16S rRNA profiling on different sections of Hydra, we found that different microbial species favor different regions along the body column, including foot- and head-dominating microbiota (Figure 1E and F). Based on these intriguing data and recent insights into how fluid flow shapes spatial distributions of bacteria (Wheeler et al., 2019), we hypothesized that the spontaneous contractions might generate fluidic microhabitats that facilitate the microbial biogeography along the body column.

Kinematics and flow physics of individual spontaneous contractions

To explore this hypothesis, we used video microscopy and analyzed the animal’s body kinematics to assess the differential impact of spontaneous contractions on the fluid microenvironment. We examined the contraction activity (Figure 2A) of multiple animals over 8 hr and recorded an average contraction frequency of 2.5 spontaneous contractions per hour (Figure 2—figure supplements 1 and 2, Figure 2—figure supplement 3 control conditions), corresponding to an average duration ($T_{\text{IC}}$) of the inter-contraction intervals of 24 min. To arrive at estimates rooted in probability theory that take into consideration the distribution of $T_{\text{IC}}$, we collected the measured $T_{\text{IC}}$ from all animals in the form of a histogram (Figure 2—figure supplement 3B, control condition). The resulting distribution of $T_{\text{IC}}$ is best fit by an exponential distribution, implying that contraction events of individual polyps follow a stochastic Poisson process. We computed the average frequency based on the exponential fit to these biological data. We found that the so-computed contraction frequency is equal to 2.9 contractions per hour, which is slightly larger than the 2.5 contractions per hour obtained by taking a direct average of the data.

Figure 2 with 6 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Each stage of the inter-contraction intervals and spontaneous contraction cycle is characterized by stereotypic kinematic patterns of Hydra’s motion trajectories and velocities (Figure 2A, bottom). During inter-contraction intervals, which on average last tens of minutes (Figure 2—figure supplement 3B), Hydra’s body column remains nearly fully extended and slowly revolves at full length around its foothold, tracing a cone-shaped volume over time (Figure 2B, Video 1). By contrast, spontaneous contraction events typically last a few seconds and are characterized by a stepwise shortening of the body column with one or more peak contraction events until the body column has shortened to 20% or less of its original length (Figure 2A–C). A peak contraction is defined as any part of the spontaneous contraction during which Hydra contracts at a rate of 25% change in body length per second or more. spontaneous contractions are frequently accompanied by axial rotation in a spiraling downward motion (Figure 2A and B, Video 1) and are typically followed by slow re-extension to inter-contraction interval length (Figure 2A) in a random direction (Figure 2—figure supplement 4). We quantified the speeds and timescales that different regions of Hydra’s body column experience during inter-contraction intervals and spontaneous contractions. During spontaneous contractions, specifically during peak contractions characterized by simultaneous linear shortening and axial rotation, the oral region accelerates to peak velocities $U_{\text{PC}}$ of 10 mm/s. This is almost two orders of magnitude faster than maximal head speeds $U_{\text{IC}}$ during inter-contraction intervals, which are on the order of 0.1 mm/s in both longitudinal and axial directions (Figure 2B and C). Further, peak contraction rarely last longer than ${\displaystyle T_{\text{PC}}=1\mathrm{s}}$ and hence operate at 1000-fold smaller timescales than inter-contraction intervals (with mean duration of ca. 24 min, i.e., 1440 s).

Video 1

Download asset

To assess the effects of Hydra’s body kinematics on its fluid environment, we computed the Reynolds number Re = $\mathrm{\ell }U/\mu$ at the tentacles near Hydra’s mouth, where the tentacle diameter is $\mathrm{\ell }=0.1$ mm, the kinematic viscosity of water at 20°C is $\mu =1.0034$ mm²/s, and the tentacle speed $U$ is in mm/s. The Re number compares the effects of fluid inertia to viscous drag forces. During inter-contraction intervals, $U=U_{IC}$ is on the order of 0.1 mm/s, and Re is on the order of 0.01. At such low Re number, fluid flow is dominated by viscous effects and distinguished by the presence of a laminar and expansive fluid boundary layer. The fluid boundary layer can be envisioned as an envelope of fluid enclosing Hydra and moving at the same velocity as Hydra’s surface. The thickness of the fluid boundary layer is defined as the distance from the surface at which the fluid speed decreases by 90% compared to Hydra’s speed, that is, the distance at which the fluid is no longer following Hydra’s surface (Vogel, 2020). During peak contraction, Hydra’s speed $U=U_{\text{PC}}$ is on the order of 10 mm/s, Re increases to the order of 1, which indicates greater inertial effects that result in thinning of the fluid boundary layer (Schlichting and Gersten, 2000).

To label the fluid boundary layer and assess the animal–fluid interactions experimentally (Nawroth and Dabiri, 2014), we added fluorescent dye adjacent to Hydra’s oral region while in the inter-contraction interval state. In one representative recording (Figure 2D, left, Video 2), the dye faithfully followed the fully extended animal’s slow revolutions during the inter-contraction interval for more than 1 min, qualitatively confirming the presence of a stably attached fluid boundary layer. Intriguingly, as the animal underwent a spontaneous contraction (with two peak contraction events), the dye separated from the animal’s surface and stayed behind as Hydra retracted, indicating shedding of the original fluid boundary layer (Figure 2D, right, Video 2). Since the animals tend to slowly re-extend into a random direction (Figure 2—figure supplement 4), their chances of re-encountering the shed fluid are small. To confirm these observations quantitatively and to measure the dynamically changing fluid boundary layer thickness, we recorded the microscale fluid motion using particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) as described previously (Nawroth et al., 2017). During inter-contraction intervals, fluid parcels at distances far from the body column followed the animal’s trajectory, reflecting an expansive fluid boundary layer of almost one full-body length in thickness (fluid boundary layer thickness = 5 mm) (Figure 2E and G, Figure 2—figure supplement 5A, Video 3). In contrast, during peak contractions, only the fluid close to Hydra’s surface accelerated with the body, whereas fluid at further distances remained unaffected (fluid boundary layer thickness = 1.5 mm) (Figure 2F and G, Figure 2—figure supplement 5B, Video 3). The thickness of the fluid boundary layer correlated inversely with body speed (Figure 2H). These measurements demonstrate shedding of the fluid boundary layer during contractions and significant reduction in the thickness of the fluid boundary layer that had developed during the inter-contraction interval. Thus, recurrent spontaneous contractions result in regular shedding of the fluid boundary layer (as illustrated by the streak of dye left behind in Figure 2D), enabling Hydra to partially escape from its previous fluid environment and thereby transiently reshape the chemical microenvironment at the epithelial surface where the microbial symbionts are localized. Importantly, the contraction events form a brief perturbation of the inter-contraction interval flow regime at the oral region, while the foot region remains motionless even during peak contractions (Figure 2B) and experiences slow flow speeds of maximal values on the order of 0.1 mm/s (Figure 2—figure supplement 5B). These flow speeds are comparable to flow speeds experienced at the head between contractions (Figure 2—figure supplement 5A). Taken together, these results suggest that Hydra’s spontaneous contractions lead to a maximal shedding of viscous boundary layers near the head’s surface, and minimal shedding near the foot’s surface. This differentiation in the fluid environment could be relevant because of our finding that Hydra’s surface is colonized by foot- and head-dominating microbiota (Figure 1D and E). Contraction-induced fluid boundary layer shedding may enhance the transport of bacteria-relevant compounds, such as metabolites, antimicrobials, and extracellular vesicles (Fischbach and Segre, 2016; Ñahui Palomino et al., 2021), between Hydra’s head and the fluid environment, compared to lower transport near the foot, hence generating biochemical microhabitats that could promote the observed microbial biogeography. This hypothesis is not readily amenable to experimental interrogation. To date, there are no universal tools for experimentally identifying individual and combinations of the many chemical compounds released or absorbed by microbes (Thorn and Greenman, 2012). We therefore probed this hypothesis indirectly. We developed a simple mathematical model of chemical transport in a fluid environment that gets regularly reset by shedding events, as discussed next.

Video 2

Download asset

Video 3

Download asset

Physics-based model predicts that contractions increase the exchange rate of chemical compounds to and from the surface

We formulated a simple physics-based mathematical model of the transport of chemical compounds to and from Hydra’s surface where the microbes reside. We exploited two key findings from our experimental data. First, between contractions, transport of chemical compounds to and from Hydra’s surface is best described by molecular diffusion rather than fluid advection. Second, peak contractions are much shorter and faster than movement during inter-contraction intervals ($T_{\text{PC}}\ll T_{\text{IC}}$ and $U_{\text{PC}}\gg U_{\text{IC}}$, see Figure 2C), and each peak contraction causes intermittent shedding of the fluid boundary layer and re-extension of Hydra’s head in a random direction. Thus, each contraction resets the fluid microenvironment and replenishes the chemical concentration around Hydra’s head, while the fluid environment at Hydra’s foot remains always at rest, akin to a permanent inter-contraction interval state.

Our dye visualization and flow quantification showed no noticeable background flows between contraction events (Figure 2D). The fact that diffusion is dominant between contractions can be formally shown by computing the Péclet number Pe = $LU/D$, which compares the relative importance of advection versus diffusion for the transport of a given compound, such as oxygen. Using the length $L$ of Hydra’s body column, the mean flow speed $U$ over 1 hr (averaging over both inter-contraction intervals and contracting periods), and the constant oxygen diffusion D at 15°C, we find that Pe is $0.005\ll 1$, implying that diffusion is dominant between contraction events, even when the flow speed $U$ is overestimated by averaging over both inter-contraction intervals and spontaneous contraction periods.

To reflect the different fluid microenvironments in the highly motile head and static foot, we approximated the respective head and foot surfaces by two non-interacting spheres of radii $a$ and $b$ separated by a distance $L$ (Figure 3A, box). When even a few percent of Hydra’s head or foot surface are covered by living microbes or host cells, the diffusion-limited rate of absorption or emission of a chemical compound by these cells is well approximated by a uniformly covered surface (Berg and Purcell, 1977). Assuming equivalence of the transport of emitted and absorbed chemical substances (see ‘Materials and methods’), we focus here on absorption only. This implies zero concentration of the chemical compound of interest, say oxygen, at Hydra’s surface. Starting in a compound-rich environment, a concentration boundary layer (CBL) depleted of that chemical compound forms and grows near the surface. In the absence of contractions, the concentration field reaches a steady state with zero rate of change of the compound concentration. Each spontaneous contraction event sheds the chemically depleted fluid boundary layer near the head and effectively resets the depletion zone growth process (Figure 3A). Accounting for unsteady diffusion following each spontaneous contraction, we computed the growth of the depletion boundary layer over time (stages 1–3 in Figure 3B), using as an example the diffusion coefficient $D$ of oxygen to derive a dimensional timescale $\tau =a^2/D$ (see ‘Materials and methods’). In the absence of fluid boundary layer shedding, such as near Hydra’s static foot, steady state is approached as time increases (stage 4 in Figure 3B). Near Hydra’s head, however, each spontaneous contraction resets the CBL thickness to zero (Figure 3C, top), resulting in an instantaneous and increased uptake of molecules, such as oxygen, in the head region (blue) compared to the foot (orange). Consecutive contractions increase the maximal cumulative uptake of compounds near Hydra’s head (blue) compared to the foot (orange) (Figure 3C, bottom).

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

To investigate the functional implications of experimentally observed temporal distribution of spontaneous contractions over many hours, we combined our physics-based model of chemical transport (Figure 3A) with a stochastic model of contraction events. Specifically, the temporal sequence of Hydra’s spontaneous contractions can be estimated mathematically by a Poisson distribution of mean $\lambda$, given that the distribution of inter-contraction intervals are best fitted by an exponential distribution of mean $1/\lambda$ (Figure 2—figure supplement 3B). We calculated analytically the expected mean and standard deviation of the cumulative uptake $J_{IC}$ over a single inter-contraction period $T_{\text{IC}}$ and of the cumulative uptake J over an extended period T (containing multiple $T_{\text{IC}}$) (see ‘Materials and methods’). We found that the expected mean value of $J_{\text{IC}}$, given by $⟨J_{\text{IC}}⟩=\sqrt{(a^2/\lambda D)}$, decreases with increasing contraction frequency $\lambda$, while the expected mean value of J, given by $⟨J⟩=\sqrt{(a^2\lambda /D)}$, increases with increasing $\lambda$. This is intuitive: as the contraction frequency increases, the inter-contraction time $T_{\text{IC}}$ decreases, so does the expected uptake $J_{\text{IC}}$ over a single inter-contraction period $T_{\text{IC}}$. However, the fluid environment gets reset more often, with each resetting event replenishing the chemical concentration, leading to an increase in the expected cumulative uptake $J$ over an extended period $T$ containing multiple contraction events.

Next, we numerically simulated data sets of inter-contraction intervals $T_{\text{IC}}$ (Figure 2—figure supplement 3C) drawn from exponential distributions of mean $1/\lambda$, where we let $\lambda$ range from 0 to 10 at 0.05 intervals. For each $\lambda$, we conducted 10,000 numerical experiments, each lasting for a fixed total time period $T=48$ hr. The obtained number of contraction events in each numerical experiment consisted of one realization taken from a Poisson distribution of mean $\lambda$. The total number of contraction events over all experiments was normally distributed, as expected from the law of large numbers (see ‘Materials and methods’). We computed numerically the cumulative oxygen uptake J over T = 48 hr for each realization (normalized by the cumulative uptake at steady state), and for each $\lambda$, we calculated the mean and standard deviation of the computed $J$. Plotting the mean and standard deviation of $J$ as a function of $\lambda$ (Figure 3D), we found that increasing λ increases the cumulative uptake $J$ and that the mean (solid black line) and standard deviation (thick purple segment) are in excellent agreement with analytical predictions (see ‘Materials and methods’).

Spontaneous contraction frequencies on the order of 10 contractions per hour and more have been reported in the Hydra (Murillo-Rincon et al., 2017, Yamamoto and Yuste, 2020), indicating that, in theory, increases in uptake rates are possible. In our experience, however, such high frequencies occur only transiently when Hydra has been stressed, for example, by transferring the animals into very small containers such as concave glass for imaging purposes. At later time points, the contraction frequency of animals in these conditions converge towards an spontaneous contraction rate around three contractions per hour (Figure 2—figure supplement 6), similar to what we observed in our regular setup condition using a large beaker setup (Figure 2—figure supplement 2A, control condition). This suggests that under unconstrained conditions, Hydra’s baseline contraction rate per hour is near 3, rather than 10.

We used the model to test the effect of limiting the maximal number of contractions over 48 hr to 144 contractions, which is the total number of contractions at an average spontaneous contraction frequency $\lambda =3$ contractions per hour. Effectively, this constraint means that once the maximum number of contractions is reached, no additional contractions are permitted during the remainder of the 48 hr, mimicking, for example, a finite energy budget for spontaneous contractions. Interestingly, imposing this constraint showed that maximal uptake gains are achieved at contractions frequencies consistent with the imposed constraint (Figure 3D, thick blue graph), and that increasing λ beyond three contractions per hour decreases the cumulative uptake.

When testing the effect of a constant-rate contraction activity, that is, with a constant $T_{\text{IC}}$ approximately equal to $48/\lambda$ hours, the model predicts a slightly increased uptake compared to stochastic activity, indicating that a precise rhythm would only confer a small benefit over the stochastic mechanism (Figure 3D, thin purple and blue graphs). Analogous results hold for the removal for accumulated chemicals produced by microbes at Hydra’s surface (see ‘Materials and methods’).

Our model indicates that Hydra’s spontaneous contractions facilitate a greater exchange rate – including both uptake and release – of chemical compounds in the oral region as compared to the static foot region. When spontaneous contraction frequency is reduced, the maximal exchange rate near the head is reduced as well and, in the extreme case of zero contractions, becomes almost identical to the steady state in the foot region.

The simplicity of the model should not distract from the universality of the mechanism it probes: the effect of stochastic contractions on the transport of chemicals to and from a surface exhibiting spontaneous wall contractions. To make analytical progress, we assumed the surface is spherical, but, by continuity arguments, the conclusions we arrived at are qualitatively valid even for non-spherical surfaces. These conclusions can be restated concisely as follows: fast spontaneous contractions of an otherwise slowly moving surface in a stagnant fluid medium cause impromptu shedding of the fluid boundary layer and lead to improved transport of chemicals to and from the surface between contraction events. Higher contraction frequencies are beneficial, but require additional, may be prohibitive, metabolic cost. A stochastic distribution of contraction events over time, following a Poisson process, produces benefits that are nearly as good as those produced by regular contractions, but without the need for a biological machinery to maintain a precise rhythm. Limiting the total number of contractions leads to decreased performance at contraction frequencies beyond what would allow the contraction events to be Poisson distributed.

Taken together, our model suggests that changing the spontaneous contraction frequency will alter the fluid microenvironment and biochemical concentrations experienced by Hydra’s microbial community; in particular, reducing the spontaneous contraction frequency would make the microenvironment near Hydra’s head, where the greatest fluid boundary layer shedding occurs during spontaneous contractions, more similar to the foot, where minimal fluid boundary layer shedding occurs.

Reducing the spontaneous contraction frequency changes the colonizing microbiota

To directly probe the impact of spontaneous contractions on the associated microbial community, we decreased Hydra’s spontaneous contraction frequency by two established methods: (1) continuous exposure to either light or darkness (Kanaya et al., 2019, Rushforth et al., 1963) and (2) chemical interference with the ion channel inhibitors menthol and lidocaine (Klimovich et al., 2020; Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Continuous exposure to light and treatment with ion channel inhibitor lidocaine reduced the spontaneous contraction frequency slightly from an average value of 2.5 contractions per hour in control conditions to 2.3 contractions per hour in continuous light and to 2.0 contractions per hour in lidocaine treatment (Figure 2—figure supplement 2A) (note that we were unable to make the measurements in the continuous dark condition). Treatment with ion channel inhibitor menthol almost completely abolished the occurrence of contractions. The treatments reduced spontaneous contraction frequency without significantly changing the frequency of other common fast contractile behaviors, such as somersaulting (Figure 2—figure supplement 2B and C; Han et al., 2018). Consistent with earlier studies (Kanaya et al., 2019, Klimovich et al., 2020), lidocaine and constant light treatment increased the likelihood of longer TIC; the contraction events remained, however, Poisson-distributed and TIC remained exponentially distributed (Figure 2—figure supplement 3B), as assumed in our mathematical model. Computing the average contraction frequency based on the best exponential fit to biological data, we found that it to be equal to 2.5, and 2.2 contractions per hour for the lidocaine, and continuous light treatments, respectively, as opposed to 2.9 contractions per hour for the control, again confirming the reduced contraction rate in the treatment groups.

We next investigated the effects of the altered spontaneous contraction frequency on Hydra’s microbiota. A 48 hr exposure to either pharmacological agents (menthol and lidocaine) or exposure to different light regimes led to a similar and significant shift in the microbial community (Figure 4, Figure 4—figure supplement 1). The relative abundance bar plot and principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of the microbial composition showed a clustering of the different treatments in response to a disturbed contraction frequency. The extent of the shift was positively correlated with the magnitude of the decrease in contraction frequency and, consequently, was the greatest in menthol-treated animals. This shift consisted of a change in the relative abundance rather than a disappearance of bacterial taxa or bacterial load (Figure 4—figure supplement 2). The fact that both light and pharmacological manipulations resulted in similar effects provides strong evidence that the change in relative bacterial abundance is related to the altered spontaneous contraction frequencies. We further verified by using a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) assay that there were no inhibitory effects of the pharmacological substances on the bacteria (Figure 4—figure supplement 3).

Figure 4 with 5 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

We evaluated the differences between control and treatment groups for up- or downregulated bacteria using linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) (Segata et al., 2011). When spontaneous contractions were reduced, the foot-specific microbial colonizers Flavobacterium, Pseudomonas, and Acidovorax (Figure 1E and F) became more abundant (Figure 4E–G). Taken together, these data suggest that a reduced spontaneous contraction frequency alters the microbial composition and potentially expands the biogeography of foot-associated bacteria.

Our fluid and transport analysis suggests that these changes in the microbiota result from an altered biochemical microenvironment near Hydra’s head, which is shaped by the spontaneous contraction frequency. In particular, our mathematical model, which faithfully mimics the distribution of inter-contraction intervals under control and disturbed conditions (Figure 2—figure supplement 3B and C), predicts that the reduction in spontaneous contraction frequency seen in the experimental treatments (lidocaine, methanol, continuous light) decreases the cumulative uptake or release of any bacteria-relevant chemical compound near Hydra’s head (Figure 3C), such that the head’s biochemical microenvironment becomes more similar to the static foot region (Figure 3C).

However, another explanation of the observed changes in the microbiota could be that the contractions are important for the direct displacement of the microbes to other parts of the body. To investigate whether spontaneous contraction have a direct physical impact on the microbiome, we first took video recordings of a normal Hydra polyp colonized with fluorescently labeled bacteria during a full contraction cycle. We could neither observe an overall change in the colonization pattern nor the physical detachment of labeled bacteria (Figure 4—figure supplement 4, Videos 4 and 5). Thus, at short time scale (few seconds), an individual contraction cycle does not affect the biogeography of the microbiome. We also probed whether a lack of recurrent spontaneous contractions may lead to a remodeled glycocalyx, for example, by hindering its redistribution during spontaneous contractions, and thereby alter the growth conditions of bacteria. Here, we used an antibody specific for a component of Hydra’s glycocalyx (Böttger et al., 2012) and visualized the glycocalyx in animals immobilized for a prolonged (48 hr) time period (Figure 4—figure supplement 5). Since we could not detect major changes in the glycocalyx layer, we concluded that the observed changes in the microbiota are unlikely the cause of glycocalyx remodeling. These results strongly suggest that the fluid boundary layer shedding and resultant chemical exchange by Hydra’s spontaneous contractions stabilize microbial colonization and contribute to shaping the microbial biogeography along the body column (Figure 1D and E).

Video 4

Download asset

Video 5

Download asset

The epithelia and microbial symbionts of Hydra’s body walls interface with slow-moving or highly viscous fluids. They rely on diffusion for the transport of chemical compounds to and from the surface. Hydra cannot engage in more efficient transport mechanisms via fluid advection (Nawroth et al., 2017, Gilpin et al., 2017, Pepper et al., 2010) because it lacks the ciliary or muscular appendages used by other organisms in the low and intermediate Reynolds number regimes to generate unsteady flows and vortices. Soft corals, for example, operate at intermediate Reynolds numbers and use rhythmic pulsations of their tentacles to generate bulk flow that removes oxygen waste (Samson et al., 2019). Although individual corals reach diameters similar to that of fully extended Hydra (ca. 1 cm), they usually occur in dense clusters and contract rhythmically at 0.5 Hz, leading to collective fluid advection with Péclet numbers on the order of 10–1000, compared to Pe = 0.005 computed for a single Hydra with only a handful of contractions per hour, indicating that the two organisms represent different scenarios. Our study suggests that Hydra does not leverage fluid advection but instead facilitates the diffusion process through its spontaneous contractions, which cause transiently and locally higher flow rates and greatly improve the exchange of fluid near the epithelial surface by shedding the so-called fluid boundary layer. This is analogous to a recently discovered ‘sneezing’ mechanism by which marine sponges remove mucus from their surface by recurrent spontaneous contractions (Kornder et al., 2022). Combining high-throughput microbiota profiling, in vivo flow analysis, and mathematical modeling, we found that such exchange facilitates the transport of compounds, including nutrients, waste, antimicrobials, and gases, to and from surface-residing symbiotic microbiota and may take part in maintaining a specific microbiota biogeography along the Hydra’s body column (Augustin et al., 2017). Interestingly, this distinct spatial colonization pattern along the body column could not only be essential for pathogen defense (Bosch, 2013, Fraune et al., 2015) but could also be important for modulating the frequency of Hydra’s spontaneous contractions (Murillo-Rincon et al., 2017), suggesting a feedback loop that could be the focus of future studies.

Our results may also have broader applicability. Hydra’s mucous layer covering the epithelium – an inner layer with stratified organization devoid of bacteria, beneath an outer loose layer colonized by symbionts – is similar to the mammalian colon. Like Hydra, the peristaltic gut displays recurrent spontaneous contractions (Gill et al., 1986, Koch et al., 1988, Swaminathan et al., 2016) and a viscosity-dominated, low Reynolds number flow regime (Janssen et al., 2007). Disturbance of this contractile activity (e.g., intestinal dysmotility) is correlated with dysbiosis (Hadizadeh et al., 2017, Scott and Cahall, 1982, Vandeputte et al., 2016), which can lead to bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine and irritable bowel syndrome (Kostic et al., 2014, Toskes, 1993). Microfluidic models mimicking the viscous environment and laminar flow of the gut suggest that intestinal contractions mix the luminal content, which appears to modulate microbial density and composition (Cremer et al., 2016). These observations are consistent with our findings in Hydra and suggest that spontaneous contractions might both depend on microbial colonizers and also regulate host–bacteria associations.

Finally, our non-dimensional model enables the generalized prediction that body wall contractions, whether in Hydra, the gut, or other systems, cause relative improvement of transport for any compound that is produced or consumed near an epithelial surface in low Reynolds number conditions, thereby simultaneously preventing the build-up of metabolic waste and restoring depleted nutrients. Lowering the frequency of spontaneous contractions by 10–15%, as seen in our experiments, is predicted to reduce the uptake (or removal) rates of individual compounds by a similar order of magnitude. It is intriguing that such a relatively small change in spontaneous contraction rate altered the microbiome significantly and consistently across treatments. One explanation is that since fluid boundary layer shedding by contractions affects the transport of any chemical compound near the surface, decreasing the contraction rate might alter the uptake or removal of many compounds at once. As shown in a recent study on the response of microbial populations to altered soil properties, such combinatorial effects can greatly exceed, and complicate, the impact of any single factor (Rillig et al., 2019). Intuitively, and confirmed by our model, increasing the frequency of contractions results in greater transport to and from the surface. Since spontaneous contractions are energetically expensive processes, Hydra under normal conditions may get along well with a moderate rate of about three contractions per hour. Our computational model indicates that this rate still provides significant enhancement over purely diffusive transport, and our experimental data show that lower rates tend to destabilize the microbiome. Taken together, this suggests that Hydra’s rhythm of spontaneous contractions might be operating at a sweet spot of efficiency. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a stochastic distribution of a limited number of contractions over time results in a more effective transport than other strategies, such as alternating periods with a higher frequency of contractions with periods that are static. While contractions at regular time intervals would be slightly more effective still, this would require the presence and maintenance of pacemaker circuits with precisely controlled firing frequency. Though future work is needed, our results suggest that Hydra – and possibly other contractile epithelial systems – achieve near optimal efficiency without the need for a costly high-precision pacemaker system.

Inspired by Dobzhansky’s dictum that “nothing in biology makes sense but in the light of evolution” (Dobzhansky, 1964), we speculate that spontaneous contractions were critical early in the evolution of a gut system to maintain a stable microbiota. In this context, an observation in a new species of hydrothermal vent Yeti crabs, Kiwa puravida n.sp. is of interest (Thurber et al., 2011). The crabs farm symbiotic bacteria on the surface of their chelipeds (claws) and wave these chelipeds continuously in a constant rhythm. In search of an explanation, the authors stated: “We hypothesize that K. puravida n. sp. waves its chelipeds to shear off boundary layers formed by their epibionts productivity, increasing both the epibionts and, in turn, their own access to food” (Thurber et al., 2011). Pointing in the same direction, a study on multiciliated surface cells in amphibian and some fish embryos ends with the hypothesis that the fluid flow generated by these cells may contribute to managing embryo-associated microbial consortia (Kerney, 2021). In light of these interesting hypotheses, well-controlled perturbation experiments in Hydra may offer a unique model to study both the mechanisms and the in vivo role of host generated water flow in maintaining a stable microbiome.

All data presented in the main manuscript, figures and figure supplements is publicly available at NCBI Bioproject PRJNA842888. The 16S rRNA sequencing raw data are deposited at the SRA and are available under the project ID PRJNA842888.

1. 1. Giez C
   2. Klimovich A
   3. Bosch TCG

   (2022) NCBI BioProject

   ID PRJNA842888. Spontaneous body wall contractions shape and stabilize the symbiotic microbiota.

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA842888

1. 1. Augustin R
   2. Schröder K
   3. Murillo Rincón AP
   4. Fraune S
   5. Anton-Erxleben F
   6. Herbst EM
   7. Wittlieb J
   8. Schwentner M
   9. Grötzinger J
   10. Wassenaar TM
   11. Bosch TCG

   (2017) A secreted antibacterial neuropeptide shapes the microbiome of hydra

   Nature Communications 8:698.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00625-1

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Bayer FM
   2. Lyonet P
   3. Pronk C
   4. van der Schley J
   5. Trembley A

   (1744) Mémoires pour Servir À L’Histoire d’un genre de Polypes D’Eau Douce, À Bras en forme de Cornes

   Memoire Sur Le Polypes 1:1–404.

   https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.64073

   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Berg HC
   2. Purcell EM

   (1977) Physics of Chemoreception

   Biophysical Journal 20:193–219.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(77)85544-6

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Bosch TCG

   (2013) Cnidarian-microbe interactions and the origin of innate immunity in Metazoans

   Annual Review of Microbiology 67:499–518.

   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155626

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Bosch TCG

   (2014) Rethinking the role of immunity: lessons from Hydra

   Trends in Immunology 35:495–502.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2014.07.008

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Bosch TCG
   2. Klimovich A
   3. Domazet-Lošo T
   4. Gründer S
   5. Holstein TW
   6. Jékely G
   7. Miller DJ
   8. Murillo-Rincon AP
   9. Rentzsch F
   10. Richards GS
   11. Schröder K
   12. Technau U
   13. Yuste R

   (2017) Back to the basics: Cnidarians start to fire

   Trends in Neurosciences 40:92–105.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2016.11.005

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Bosch TCG
   2. McFall-Ngai M

   (2021) Animal development in the microbial world: re-thinking the conceptual framework

   Current Topics in Developmental Biology 141:399–427.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ctdb.2020.11.007

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Böttger A
   2. Doxey AC
   3. Hess MW
   4. Pfaller K
   5. Salvenmoser W
   6. Deutzmann R
   7. Geissner A
   8. Pauly B
   9. Altstätter J
   10. Münder S
   11. Heim A
   12. Gabius H-J
   13. McConkey BJ
   14. David CN

   (2012) Horizontal gene transfer contributed to the evolution of extracellular surface structures: the freshwater Polyp Hydra is covered by a complex fibrous Cuticle containing Glycosaminoglycans and proteins of the Ppod and Swt (sweet tooth) families

   PLOS ONE 7:e52278.

   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052278

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Callahan BJ
   2. McMurdie PJ
   3. Rosen MJ
   4. Han AW
   5. Johnson AJA
   6. Holmes SP

   (2016) Dada2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina Amplicon data

   Nature Methods 13:581–583.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. Book

    1. Carslaw HS
    2. Jaeger JC

    (1959)

    Conduction of Heat in Solids

    Clarendon Press.

    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Cremer J
    2. Segota I
    3. Yang CY
    4. Arnoldini M
    5. Sauls JT
    6. Zhang Z
    7. Gutierrez E
    8. Groisman A
    9. Hwa T

    (2016) Effect of flow and Peristaltic mixing on bacterial growth in a gut-like channel

    PNAS 113:11414–11419.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601306113

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Dobzhansky T

    (1964) Biology, molecular and organismic

    American Zoologist 4:443–452.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/4.4.443

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Fang J
    2. Wang H
    3. Zhou Y
    4. Zhang H
    5. Zhou H
    6. Zhang X

    (2021) Slimy partners: the mucus barrier and gut Microbiome in ulcerative colitis

    Experimental & Molecular Medicine 53:772–787.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-021-00617-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Ferrières L
    2. Hémery G
    3. Nham T
    4. Guérout AM
    5. Mazel D
    6. Beloin C
    7. Ghigo JM

    (2010) Silent mischief: Bacteriophage mu insertions contaminate products of Escherichia coli random Mutagenesis performed using suicidal Transposon delivery Plasmids mobilized by broad-host-range Rp4 Conjugative machinery

    Journal of Bacteriology 192:6418–6427.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00621-10

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Fischbach MA
    2. Segre JA

    (2016) Signaling in host-associated microbial communities

    Cell 164:1288–1300.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.037

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Franzenburg S
    2. Walter J
    3. Künzel S
    4. Wang J
    5. Baines JF
    6. Bosch TC
    7. Fraune S

    (2013) Distinct antimicrobial peptide expression determines host species-specific bacterial associations

    PNAS 110:E3730–E3738.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304960110

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Fraune S
    2. Anton-Erxleben F
    3. Augustin R
    4. Franzenburg S
    5. Knop M
    6. Schröder K
    7. Willoweit-Ohl D
    8. Bosch TCG

    (2015) Bacteria-bacteria interactions within the Microbiota of the ancestral Metazoan Hydra contribute to fungal resistance

    The ISME Journal 9:1543–1556.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.239

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Gill RC
    2. Cote KR
    3. Bowes KL
    4. Kingma YJ

    (1986) Human Colonic smooth muscle: spontaneous contractile activity and response to stretch

    Gut 27:1006–1013.

    https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.27.9.1006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Gilpin W
    2. Prakash VN
    3. Prakash M

    (2017) Vortex arrays and Ciliary tangles underlie the feeding–swimming trade-off in Starfish larvae

    Nature Physics 13:380–386.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3981

    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Ginestet C

    (2011) Ggplot2: elegant Graphics for data analysis

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 174:245–246.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2010.00676_9.x

    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Hadizadeh F
    2. Walter S
    3. Belheouane M
    4. Bonfiglio F
    5. Heinsen FA
    6. Andreasson A
    7. Agreus L
    8. Engstrand L
    9. Baines JF
    10. Rafter J
    11. Franke A
    12. D’Amato M

    (2017) Stool frequency is associated with gut Microbiota composition

    Gut 66:559–560.

    https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311935

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Han S
    2. Taralova E
    3. Dupre C
    4. Yuste R

    (2018) Comprehensive machine learning analysis of Hydra behavior reveals a stable basal behavioral repertoire

    eLife 7:e32605.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32605

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Janssen PWM
    2. Lentle RG
    3. Asvarujanon P
    4. Chambers P
    5. Stafford KJ
    6. Hemar Y

    (2007) Characterization of flow and mixing regimes within the ileum of the Brushtail possum using residence time distribution analysis with simultaneous Spatio-temporal mapping

    The Journal of Physiology 582:1239–1248.

    https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2007.134403

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Kanaya HJ
    2. Kobayakawa Y
    3. Itoh TQ

    (2019) Hydra Vulgaris exhibits day-night variation in behavior and gene expression levels

    Zoological Letters 5:10.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40851-019-0127-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Kerney R

    (2021) Developing inside a layer of germs—a potential role for Multiciliated surface cells in vertebrate embryos

    Diversity 13:527.

    https://doi.org/10.3390/d13110527

    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Klimovich AV
    2. Bosch TCG

    (2018a) Rethinking the role of the nervous system: lessons from the Hydra Holobiont

    BioEssays 40:e1800060.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201800060

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Klimovich A
    2. Rehm A
    3. Wittlieb J
    4. Herbst EM
    5. Benavente R
    6. Bosch TCG

    (2018b) Non-Senescent Hydra Tolerates severe disturbances in the nuclear Lamina

    Aging 10:951–972.

    https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.101440

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Klimovich A
    2. Wittlieb J
    3. Bosch TC

    (2019) Transgenesis in Hydra to characterize gene function and visualize cell behavior

    Nature Protocols 14:2069–2090.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-019-0173-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Klimovich A
    2. Giacomello S
    3. Björklund Å
    4. Faure L
    5. Kaucka M
    6. Giez C
    7. Murillo-Rincon AP
    8. Matt A-S
    9. Willoweit-Ohl D
    10. Crupi G
    11. de Anda J
    12. Wong GCL
    13. D’Amato M
    14. Adameyko I
    15. Bosch TCG

    (2020) Prototypical pacemaker neurons interact with the resident Microbiota

    PNAS 117:17854–17863.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920469117

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Koch TR
    2. Carney JA
    3. Go VL
    4. Szurszewski JH

    (1988) Spontaneous contractions and some electrophysiologic properties of circular muscle from normal sigmoid colon and ulcerative colitis

    Gastroenterology 95:77–84.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(88)90293-4

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Kornder NA
    2. Esser Y
    3. Stoupin D
    4. Leys SP
    5. Mueller B
    6. Vermeij MJA
    7. Huisman J
    8. de Goeij JM

    (2022) Sponges sneeze mucus to shed particulate waste from their seawater inlet pores

    Current Biology 32:3855–3861.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.07.017

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Kostic AD
    2. Xavier RJ
    3. Gevers D

    (2014) The Microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease: Current status and the future ahead

    Gastroenterology 146:1489–1499.

    https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2014.02.009

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Kremien M
    2. Shavit U
    3. Mass T
    4. Genin A

    (2013) Benefit of pulsation in soft corals

    PNAS 110:8978–8983.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301826110

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Love MI
    2. Huber W
    3. Anders S

    (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-Seq data with Deseq2

    Genome Biology 15:550.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. McMurdie PJ
    2. Holmes S

    (2013) Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of Microbiome census data

    PLOS ONE 8:e61217.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Murillo-Rincon AP
    2. Klimovich A
    3. Pemöller E
    4. Taubenheim J
    5. Mortzfeld B
    6. Augustin R
    7. Bosch TCG

    (2017) Spontaneous body contractions are modulated by the Microbiome of Hydra

    Scientific Reports 7:15937.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16191-x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Ñahui Palomino RA
    2. Vanpouille C
    3. Costantini PE
    4. Margolis L

    (2021) Microbiota–host communications: bacterial extracellular Vesicles as a common language

    PLOS Pathogens 17:e1009508.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009508

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Nawroth JC
    2. Feitl KE
    3. Colin SP
    4. Costello JH
    5. Dabiri JO

    (2010) Phenotypic plasticity in juvenile Jellyfish Medusae facilitates effective animal–fluid interaction

    Biology Letters 6:389–393.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0068

    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Nawroth JC
    2. Lee H
    3. Feinberg AW
    4. Ripplinger CM
    5. McCain ML
    6. Grosberg A
    7. Dabiri JO
    8. Parker KK

    (2012) A tissue-engineered Jellyfish with Biomimetic propulsion

    Nature Biotechnology 30:792–797.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2269

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Nawroth JC
    2. Dabiri JO

    (2014) Induced drift by a self-propelled swimmer at intermediate Reynolds numbers

    Physics of Fluids 26:091108.

    https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4893537

    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Nawroth JC
    2. Guo H
    3. Koch E
    4. Heath-Heckman EAC
    5. Hermanson JC
    6. Ruby EG
    7. Dabiri JO
    8. Kanso E
    9. McFall-Ngai M

    (2017) Motile cilia create fluid-mechanical Microhabitats for the active recruitment of the host Microbiome

    PNAS 114:9510–9516.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706926114

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. Software

    1. Oksanen J
    2. Blanchet FG
    3. Kindt R
    4. Legendre P
    5. McGlinn D
    6. Minchin PR
    7. O’Hara RB
    8. Simpson GL
    9. Solymos P
    10. Stevens MHH
    11. Szoecs E
    12. Wagner H

    (2013) Vegan, version 0ddfa4e

    Github.

    https://github.com/vegandevs/vegan
43. 1. Pepper RE
    2. Roper M
    3. Ryu S
    4. Matsudaira P
    5. Stone HA

    (2010) Nearby boundaries create eddies near microscopic filter feeders

    Journal of the Royal Society, Interface 7:851–862.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2009.0419

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Purcell EM

    (1977) Life at low Reynolds number

    American Journal of Physics 45:3–11.

    https://doi.org/10.1119/1.10903

    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Rausch P
    2. Basic M
    3. Batra A
    4. Bischoff SC
    5. Blaut M
    6. Clavel T
    7. Gläsner J
    8. Gopalakrishnan S
    9. Grassl GA
    10. Günther C
    11. Haller D
    12. Hirose M
    13. Ibrahim S
    14. Loh G
    15. Mattner J
    16. Nagel S
    17. Pabst O
    18. Schmidt F
    19. Siegmund B
    20. Strowig T
    21. Volynets V
    22. Wirtz S
    23. Zeissig S
    24. Zeissig Y
    25. Bleich A
    26. Baines JF

    (2016) Analysis of factors contributing to variation in the C57Bl/6J fecal Microbiota across German animal facilities

    International Journal of Medical Microbiology 306:343–355.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2016.03.004

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Rich A

    (2018) Improved imaging of Zebrafish motility

    Neurogastroenterology and Motility 30:e13435.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13435

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Rillig MC
    2. Ryo M
    3. Lehmann A
    4. Aguilar-Trigueros CA
    5. Buchert S
    6. Wulf A
    7. Iwasaki A
    8. Roy J
    9. Yang G

    (2019) The role of multiple global change factors in driving soil functions and microbial Biodiversity

    Science 366:886–890.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay2832

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. Book

    1. Ross SM

    (2014)

    Introduction to Probability Models

    Academic press.

    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Rushforth NB
    2. Burnett AL
    3. Maynard R

    (1963) Behavior in Hydra: contraction responses of Hydra Pirardi to mechanical and light stimuli

    Science 139:760–761.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.139.3556.760

    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Samson JE
    2. Miller LA
    3. Ray D
    4. Holzman R
    5. Shavit U
    6. Khatri S

    (2019) A novel mechanism of mixing by pulsing corals

    The Journal of Experimental Biology 222:jeb192518.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.192518

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Schierwater B
    2. Murtha M
    3. Dick M
    4. Ruddle FH
    5. Buss LW

    (1991) Homeoboxes in Cnidarians

    The Journal of Experimental Zoology 260:413–416.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402600316

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Schindelin J
    2. Arganda-Carreras I
    3. Frise E
    4. Kaynig V
    5. Longair M
    6. Pietzsch T
    7. Preibisch S
    8. Rueden C
    9. Saalfeld S
    10. Schmid B
    11. Tinevez J-Y
    12. White DJ
    13. Hartenstein V
    14. Eliceiri K
    15. Tomancak P
    16. Cardona A

    (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis

    Nature Methods 9:676–682.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. Book

    1. Schlichting H
    2. Gersten K

    (2000) Boundary-Layer Theory

    Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85829-1

    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Schröder K
    2. Bosch TCG

    (2016) The origin of Mucosal immunity: lessons from the Holobiont Hydra

    MBio 7:e01184-16.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01184-16

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Scott LD
    2. Cahall DL

    (1982) Influence of the Interdigestive Myoelectric complex on Enteric Flora in the rat

    Gastroenterology 82:737–745.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(82)90320-1

    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Segata N
    2. Izard J
    3. Waldron L
    4. Gevers D
    5. Miropolsky L
    6. Garrett WS
    7. Huttenhower C

    (2011) Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation

    Genome Biology 12:R60.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Swaminathan M
    2. Hill-Yardin E
    3. Ellis M
    4. Zygorodimos M
    5. Johnston LA
    6. Gwynne RM
    7. Bornstein JC

    (2016) Video imaging and Spatiotemporal maps to analyze gastrointestinal motility in mice

    Journal of Visualized Experiments 1:53828.

    https://doi.org/10.3791/53828

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Thielicke W
    2. Stamhuis EJ

    (2014) Pivlab–towards user-friendly, affordable and accurate Digital particle image Velocimetry in Matlab

    Journal of Open Research Software 2:jors.bl.

    https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.bl

    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Thorn RMS
    2. Greenman J

    (2012) Microbial volatile compounds in health and disease conditions

    Journal of Breath Research 6:024001.

    https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7155/6/2/024001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Thurber AR
    2. Jones WJ
    3. Schnabel K

    (2011) Dancing for food in the deep sea: bacterial farming by a new species of Yeti crab

    PLOS ONE 6:e26243.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026243

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Tinevez J-Y
    2. Perry N
    3. Schindelin J
    4. Hoopes GM
    5. Reynolds GD
    6. Laplantine E
    7. Bednarek SY
    8. Shorte SL
    9. Eliceiri KW

    (2017) Trackmate: an open and extensible platform for single-particle tracking

    Methods 115:80–90.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.016

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Toskes PP

    (1993)

    Bacterial overgrowth of the gastrointestinal tract

    Advances in Internal Medicine 38:387–407.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Trojanowski NF
    2. Raizen DM
    3. Fang-Yen C

    (2016) Pharyngeal pumping in Caenorhabditis elegans depends on tonic and Phasic signaling from the nervous system

    Scientific Reports 6:22940.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22940

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Vandeputte D
    2. Falony G
    3. Vieira-Silva S
    4. Tito RY
    5. Joossens M
    6. Raes J

    (2016) Stool consistency is strongly associated with gut Microbiota richness and composition, Enterotypes and bacterial growth rates

    Gut 65:57–62.

    https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309618

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. Book

    1. Vogel S

    (2020) Life in Moving Fluids: The Physical Biology of Flow-Revised And

    Princeton University Press.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvzsmfc6

    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Wein T
    2. Dagan T
    3. Fraune S
    4. Bosch TC
    5. Reusch TB
    6. Hülter NF

    (2018) Carrying capacity and Colonization Dynamics of Curvibacter in the Hydra host habitat

    Frontiers in Microbiology 9:443.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00443

    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Wheeler JD
    2. Secchi E
    3. Rusconi R
    4. Stocker R

    (2019) Not just going with the flow: the effects of fluid flow on bacteria and Plankton

    Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 35:213–237.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100818-125119

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Wiles TJ
    2. Wall ES
    3. Schlomann BH
    4. Hay EA
    5. Parthasarathy R
    6. Guillemin K

    (2018) Modernized tools for streamlined genetic manipulation and comparative study of wild and diverse Proteobacterial lineages

    MBio 9:e01877-18.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01877-18

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Wittlieb J
    2. Khalturin K
    3. Lohmann JU
    4. Anton-Erxleben F
    5. Bosch TC

    (2006) Transgenic Hydra allow in vivo tracking of individual stem cells during Morphogenesis

    PNAS 103:6208–6211.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510163103

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Yamamoto W
    2. Yuste R

    (2020) Whole-body imaging of neural and muscle activity during behavior in Hydra Vulgaris: effect of Osmolarity on contraction bursts

    ENeuro 7:ENEURO.0539-19.2020.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0539-19.2020

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Janna C Nawroth

   1. Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
   2. Helmholtz Pioneer Campus and Institute of Biological and Medical Imaging (IBMI), Helmholtz Munich (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany
   3. Chair of Biological Imaging at the Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research (TranslaTUM), School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Contributed equally with

   Christoph Giez

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1898-3968

2. Christoph Giez

   Zoological Institute, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany

   Contribution

   Data curation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Contributed equally with

   Janna C Nawroth

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8101-6498

3. Alexander Klimovich

   Zoological Institute, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1764-0613

4. Eva Kanso

   Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   For correspondence

   kanso@usc.edu

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0336-585X

5. Thomas CG Bosch

   Zoological Institute, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing

   For correspondence

   tbosch@zoologie.uni-kiel.de

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9488-5545

• 621

  views

• 105

  downloads

• 2

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.