P2X receptors are a family of ion channels that are activated by extracellular ATP (Khakh and North, 2006). There are seven subtypes of P2X receptor channels that are widely expressed throughout the body, including the central and peripheral nervous systems, as well as the cardiovascular, immune, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary systems (Khakh and North, 2006; Illes et al., 2021). They are thought to play a wide range of important roles, from transmitting gustatory signals, sensing bladder filling, mediating neuropathic and inflammatory pain, to regulating immune responses (Khakh and North, 2006; Surprenant and North, 2009; Schmid and Evans, 2019; Illes et al., 2021).

Structures of P2X3, P2X4, and P2X7 receptor subtypes solved using X-ray crystallography or cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), reveal that they are trimers with each subunit containing two transmembrane (TM) helices, with both N- and C-termini on the intracellular side of the membrane and a large extracellular domain that contains the ATP binding sites at the subunit interfaces (Figure 1A; Kasuya et al., 2016; Kawate et al., 2009; Hattori and Gouaux, 2012; Mansoor et al., 2016; Li et al., 2019; McCarthy et al., 2019). The TM2 helix lines the ion permeation pathway, with the activation gate positioned towards the external end of the pore (Li et al., 2008; Kawate et al., 2009; Li et al., 2010; Hattori and Gouaux, 2012). Most P2X receptors are permeable to cations like Na⁺ and Ca²⁺ (North, 2002; Egan and Khakh, 2004); however, the P2X5 receptor has been reported to have measurable Cl^- permeability (Ruppelt et al., 2001; Bo et al., 2003). Although important determinants influencing the relative permeability of Na⁺ and Ca²⁺ have been identified within the external pore of P2X receptors (Migita et al., 2001; Samways and Egan, 2007; Samways et al., 2014), the regions of the pore determining the relative permeability of cations over anions are unknown.

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

All the available structures of P2X receptors contain lateral fenestrations between the TM and extracellular domains, providing a pathway for ions to permeate through the external end of the pore (Kawate et al., 2011; Samways et al., 2011; Figure 1A). Although the initial structures of P2X4 receptor channels contained an internal pore where ions could enter or exit at the threefold axis of symmetry (Kawate et al., 2009; Hattori and Gouaux, 2012), the N- and C-termini in these structures were not resolved. More recent structures of a slowly desensitizing mutant of the P2X3 receptor channel with ATP bound (Mansoor et al., 2016) and of the P2X7 receptor channel with and without ATP bound (Mansoor et al., 2016) reveal the presence of an intracellular structural element formed by two N-terminal β-strands and a C-terminal α-helix and β-strand that physically caps the cytoplasmic end of the pore (Figure 1). Although small lateral fenestrations present in the structures containing these cytoplasmic caps have been proposed to serve as the pathway for water and ions to enter or exit the internal pore (Mansoor et al., 2016), these lateral fenestrations would be expected to be largely buried within the membrane given the dimensions of the TM domains in P2X receptor channels (Mansoor et al., 2016; McCarthy et al., 2019). However, the precise disposition of the lateral fenestrations relative to the membrane remains uncertain because these structures were solved in a detergent solution (Mansoor et al., 2016; McCarthy et al., 2019).

In the present study, we explored whether the intracellular lateral fenestrations provide a pathway for ions to enter and exit the internal pore. We identified a residue lining the lateral fenestrations that is a conserved acidic residue in the cation-selective P2X1–4 and P2X7 receptor channels but is a conserved basic residue in the anion permeable P2X5 receptor channel and could therefore play a role in determining ion selectivity. When mutated to Cys, this position is accessible to Cys-reactive reagents from both sides of the membrane, and charge-reversing mutations influence the relative permeability of cations to anions. Our results demonstrate that the lateral fenestrations provide an ion permeation pathway at the intracellular end of the pore and that they contain a critical determinant of ion selectivity.

The objective of the present study was to investigate how ions permeate through the internal pore of P2X receptor channels given the presence of the cytoplasmic caps recently identified in P2X3 and P2X7 receptor channels (Mansoor et al., 2016; McCarthy et al., 2019). Although the structures of P2X receptors solved thus far are remarkably similar within the large extracellular domain and relatively small TM domain (Kasuya et al., 2016; Kawate et al., 2009; Hattori and Gouaux, 2012; Mansoor et al., 2016; Li et al., 2019; McCarthy et al., 2019), the cytoplasmic cap has only recently been resolved in P2X3 and P2X7 structures (Mansoor et al., 2016; McCarthy et al., 2019; Figure 1; Figure 2; Figure 2—figure supplement 1). The slowly desensitizing human P2X3 receptor structural construct (hP2X3_Slow) where the cap was resolved contained three mutations (T13P, S15V, V16I) within the N-terminal region corresponding to those found in the slowly desensitizing rat P2X2 (rP2X2) receptor (Hausmann et al., 2014; Mansoor et al., 2016), enabling an ATP-bound open state to be resolved, as opposed to a desensitized state that was otherwise captured without the P2X3_Slow mutations (Mansoor et al., 2016). P2X7 receptors are slowly desensitizing and contain a cytoplasmic ballast unique to that subtype that is positioned below the cytoplasmic cap, likely helping to stabilize the cap (McCarthy et al., 2019).

Figure 2 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

In ATP-bound open state structures of both P2X3_Slow and P2X7 receptor channels, the cytoplasmic cap would be expected to prevent ions from permeating at the threefold axis of the channel (Figure 1D and E; Figure 2—figure supplement 1). While the intracellular lateral fenestrations formed by the TM helices and the cytoplasmic cap are substantial in size, the presence of a lipid membrane would likely diminish the water-accessible surface of the fenestrations considerably (Figure 1A and B). We began by using the OPM server (Lomize et al., 2012) to predict the boundaries of the lipid membrane, which suggests that the intracellular lateral fenestrations are largely buried within the membrane (Figure 1B; membrane boundaries depicted with planes of gray dots). Many of the residues lining the edges of the lateral fenestrations are hydrophobic in P2X receptors (Figure 1B, right), consistent with this structural element residing mostly within the lipid membrane.

Accessibility of a conserved Glu in the lateral fenestrations of P2X2 receptor channels

In studying the structure of the cytoplasmic cap and intracellular lateral fenestrations in hP2X3_Slow, we noticed the presence of a Glu residue (E11; Figure 1) at the intracellular edge of the lateral fenestration that is conserved in most P2X receptor channels (Figure 1C), with the exception of both P2X5 and P2X6, which contain a Lys at this position. Although P2X6 channels do not express as homomeric channels (Lê et al., 1998) and, therefore, their permeation properties are poorly understood, homomeric P2X5 receptors can be expressed and have been reported to have a significant Cl^- permeability (Ruppelt et al., 2001; Bo et al., 2003). We, therefore, thought this position in P2X receptors might provide a foothold to begin interrogating whether the lateral fenestrations contribute to forming an ion permeation pathway and whether residues in this region influence ion selectivity.

To explore whether ions might permeate through the lateral fenestrations, we decided to investigate the accessibility of an introduced Cys residue to thiol-reactive methanethiosulfonate (MTS) compounds. The rP2X2 receptor channel has been extensively used for accessibility studies because it slowly desensitizes and, therefore, is well-suited for examining changes in accessibility between open and closed states (Jiang et al., 2001; Li et al., 2008; Li et al., 2010; Kawate et al., 2011; Heymann et al., 2013). In addition, the rP2X2–3 T construct, wherein three native Cys residues were substituted with Thr residues, is insensitive to MTS compounds unless additional Cys residues are introduced and have been extensively used for accessibility studies (Li et al., 2008; Li et al., 2010; Kawate et al., 2011; Heymann et al., 2013). We began by introducing a Cys into rP2X2–3 T at the position equivalent to E11 in hP2X3 (E17 in the rP2X2), reasoning that if this acidic residue lines the lateral fenestrations in P2X2 receptor channels, a Cys introduced at this position would be accessible to thiol-reactive compounds. The concentration-dependence for activation of the E17C mutation in rP2X2–3 T by free ATP is similar to rP2X2–3 T (Figure 3—figure supplement 1), suggesting that the mutant does not dramatically alter the gating mechanism of the receptor. We initially explored the accessibility of 2-trimethylaminoethyl methanethiosulfonate (MTSET) applied from the extracellular side of the membrane to E17C, either when channels are open in the presence of ATP (Figure 3A and C), or when they are closed in the absence of ATP (Figure 3B and D). Since MTSET has a fixed positive charge at neutral pH, it cannot cross the membrane and only reacts when a Cys is positioned within an aqueous environment within the channel protein (Holmgren et al., 1996). Consistent with previous studies (Li et al., 2008), when we applied MTSET to the external solution for cells expressing the background rP2X2–3 T construct, we observed no discernible effect of the reagent when applied in the absence or presence of ATP (Figure 3A, B, E and F). In contrast, the application of MTSET in the presence of ATP resulted in robust and irreversible inhibition of the E17C rP2X2–3 T channel (Figure 3C and E). Application of external MTSET in the absence of ATP had no discernible effect on subsequent current activation by external ATP (Figure 3D and F), suggesting that the MTS reagent can only access E17C through the ion permeation pathway from the extracellular side of the membrane when the channel is open. To confirm that MTSET accessibility to E17C requires activation by ATP, we confirmed that the application of MTSET in the presence of ATP produced robust inhibition following the application of the MTSET in the absence of ATP (Figure 3D and F). We did not attempt to reverse the inhibitory effects of MTSET using reducing agents as there are five conserved disulfide bonds in the extracellular domains of P2X receptor channels (Mansoor et al., 2016; McCarthy et al., 2019) that are important for channel trafficking or function (Clyne et al., 2002; Ennion and Evans, 2002), and in our experience reducing agents make recordings unstable. From these results, we conclude that a Cys residue introduced at E17 within the intracellular lateral fenestrations is accessible to MTSET applied from the external solution when the pore of the channel has been opened with external ATP.

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

We next studied modification by 2-aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate (MTSEA), which, unlike MTSET, can readily cross membranes (Holmgren et al., 1996) and, therefore, provides the means to assess the accessibility of E17C from the intracellular side of the membrane. Similar to MTSET, the external application of MTSEA was without discernible effect on rP2X2–3 T (Figure 4A, B, E, F). Also similar to MTSET, external application of MTSEA in the presence of ATP produced robust and irreversible inhibition of ATP-activated current for the E17C rP2X2–3 T channel (Figure 4C, D and E), suggesting that external MTSEA can access E17 through the ion permeation pathway. However, in contrast to MTSET, external application of MTSEA in the absence of ATP produced discernible inhibition of currents activated by subsequent application of ATP (Figure 4D and F). Inhibition produced by external application of MTSEA in the absence of ATP prevented subsequent inhibition by external application of MTSEA in the presence of ATP (Figure 4D and F), suggesting that external MTSEA can access E17C through the ion permeation pathway when the channel is open, or cross the membrane and react with E17C from the intracellular side when the channel is closed.

Figure 4

Download asset Open asset

Having observed robust current inhibition by both MTSET and MTSEA, we next measured the rates of modification of E17C by MTSET and MTSEA in the presence of ATP and compared them with those measured in previous studies where rates of modification were reported for Cys substitutions within the pore-lining TM2 helix (Li et al., 2008). The time courses for MTS modification in the presence of ATP could be reasonably well fit by a single exponential function (Figure 5A and B), from which we calculate that MTSET modified E17C with a rate of 3.7 × 10² M^–1s^–1, while the smaller MTSEA modified that position with a rate of 2.6 × 10³ M^–1s^–1 (Figure 5D). From previous MTSET modification rates obtained in the presence of ATP for multiple positions within the TM2 helix, we can appreciate that rates of modification diminish as Cys residues are introduced deeper into the pore (Figure 5D). Notably, the modification rate for externally applied MTSET at E17C is only incrementally slower than the deepest position in the transmembrane region when applying the reagent to the external solution (Figure 5D). Given that the reagents must traverse the entire TM pore to react with E17C, these relatively rapid rates of modification suggest that E17C is positioned in a high dielectric environment that is favorable for modification. Although, lipid molecules likely occupy the upper regions of the lateral fenestrations, it seems unavoidable that the most intracellular end of the lateral fenestrations, where E17 is located, resides in an aqueous environment. From these experiments examining the modification of E17C within the lateral fenestrations, we conclude that this residue lines the intracellular end of the ion permeation pathway.

Figure 5

Download asset Open asset

Influence of lateral fenestrations on cation selectivity of P2X2 receptor channels

Having uncovered evidence that E17 lines the ion permeation pathway, we next explored whether this conserved acidic residue is a determinant of the cation selectivity in P2X2 receptors. Although, P2X receptor channels are permeable to Na⁺ and to varying extents Ca²⁺ (Migita et al., 2001; Samways and Egan, 2007; Samways et al., 2014), we are unaware of attempts to measure the relative permeability of cations to anions for most subtypes, except for those that have noted a measurable anion permeability for P2X5 receptor channels (Ruppelt et al., 2001; Bo et al., 2003). We began by assessing the relative permeability of wild-type rP2X2 to cations over anions by initially measuring equilibrium reversal potentials (V_rev) using ramps and switching between symmetrical solutions containing 140 mM NaCl on both the external and internal sides and asymmetrical solutions containing 140 mM NaCl internally and 40 mM NaCl externally, using either sucrose or glucose to maintain osmolarity (Figure 6A). To minimize errors due to possible ion accumulation on the intracellular side (Li et al., 2015), we maintained the cell in symmetrical solutions and only assessed the impact of lowering external NaCl with ATP applications just long enough to measure current-voltage (I-V) relations and determine V_rev. For wild-type rP2X2 receptor channels, we measured V_rev with symmetric solutions near 0 mV and upon switching to the external containing 40 mM NaCl observed that V_rev shifted to around –32 mV (Figure 6A and G), from which we calculate a pNa⁺:pCl^- of 20:1 using the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation (see Materials and methods), indicative of a strong preference for cations over anions. Considering that rP2X2 is inwardly rectifying and thus passes outward currents less favorably than inward currents (Zhou and Hume, 1998; Fujiwara and Kubo, 2004; George et al., 2019), we also used voltage step protocols and measured the initial tail current on stepping from –60 mV to more positive voltages, enabling the measurement of relatively linear instantaneous I-V relations and an independent determination of V_rev (Figure 6B and C). As with the ramp protocol, the step protocol resulted in shifts in V_rev from nearly 0 mV to near –32 mV upon switching the external solution from 140 mM NaCl to one containing 40 mM NaCl (Figure 6B, C and G). Collectively, these results with either ramp or step protocols establish that rP2X2 exhibits a strong preference for cations over anions.

Figure 6

Download asset Open asset

To explore whether E17 contributes to the cation selectivity, we mutated this residue to Lys, the residue that occupies the equivalent position in anion-permeable P2X5 receptor channels (Figure 1C). The E17K mutation did not appreciably alter the concentration-dependence for activation of the channel by ATP (Figure 6H), suggesting that the mutation does not perturb gating. However, the E17K mutation did alter the shift in V_rev produced by lowering external NaCl concentration, shifting V_rev to between –22 mV and –25 mV depending on whether we used ramp or step protocols, and whether ions were substituted with sucrose or glucose (Figure 6D–G). If we calculate the relative permeability of cations to anions, the E17K diminished pNa⁺:pCl^- to 10:1 from 20:1 measured for the wild-type receptor. Although these results establish that E17 is not the sole determinant of cation selectivity in P2X2 receptor channels, mutation of this residue detectably alters cation selectivity, consistent with this residue residing within the ion permeation pathway on the intracellular side of the membrane.

Influence of lateral fenestrations on anion permeability of P2X5 receptor channels

The P2X5 receptor channel has not been extensively studied because heterologous expression results in only small macroscopic currents in response to ATP application (Bo et al., 2003; Sun et al., 2019; Illes et al., 2021). We initially expressed P2X5 receptor channels from rat and mouse but observed that expression of the mouse clone produced the largest ATP-activated currents in our standard extracellular solution lacking divalent cations (see Materials and methods). We also observed a robust yet variable sensitization phenomenon whereby ATP-activated currents in cells expressing mP2X5 increased in amplitude over the time course of several minutes (Figure 7A and B). Although we have not yet explored the underlying mechanism, we adopted a standard sensitization protocol (Figure 7A) wherein we applied a saturating concentration of ATP (3 µM) until the ATP-activated current reached a steady-state before undertaking further experiments. Examination of the concentration-dependence for activation of mP2X5 revealed a relatively high affinity for ATP in the absence of divalent ions, roughly two orders of magnitude higher than wild-type rP2X2 (Figure 7C).

Figure 7

Download asset Open asset

We next examined the relative permeability of mP2X5 for cations and anions using the same approach we employed for rP2X2, in this case only using ramps because we observed relatively linear I-V relations for mP2X5 with little, if any, evidence of inward rectification (Figure 8A). Remarkably, decreasing the concentration of external NaCl did not shift V_rev towards negative voltages, as we observed for rP2X2, but instead produced a slight positive shift in V_rev by a few mV (Figure 8A and D). From these shifts in V_rev, we calculate that mP2X5 has a slight preference for anions over cations, with a relative permeability of pNa⁺:pCl^- of 0.8. These findings confirm earlier reports that P2X5 receptor channels have a much higher Cl^- permeability compared to other subtypes of P2X receptor channels (Ruppelt et al., 2001; Bo et al., 2003).

Figure 8

Download asset Open asset

To explore whether K17 is a determinant of the ion selectivity of mP2X5 receptor channel, we mutated this position to either Glu or Asp. Neither mutation appreciably altered the concentration-dependence for activation of mP2X5 by external ATP (Figure 7C), suggesting that as for rP2X2, mutations at this position within the lateral fenestrations do not appreciably alter gating. We then proceeded to measure shifts in V_rev upon switching external solutions from 140 mM NaCl to 40 mM NaCl, and strikingly observed that for both mutants, lowering the external NaCl concentration produced dramatic shifts of V_rev to voltages between –32 mV and –35 mV (Figure 8B–D), similar to what we observed for wild-type rP2X2 receptor channels (Figure 6A–C and G). From these shifts in V_rev, we calculate that K17E and K17D mutants are strongly cation-selective, with pNa⁺:pCl^- of around 20:1, indistinguishable from what we measured for wild-type rP2X2 receptor channels. These findings indicate that K17 is a critical determinant of the unusual anion permeability of mP2X5 receptor channels. Collectively, our results support the idea that the lateral fenestrations observed in recent structures of P2X3 and P2X7 receptor channels contribute to the intracellular end of the ion permeation pathway.

The objective of the present study was to explore whether ion permeation through the internal pore of P2X receptor channels could occur through the lateral fenestrations seen in recent structures of P2X3 and P2X7 receptors. One enigmatic feature of the lateral fenestrations is that they were observed for detergent-solubilized proteins, and one might expect that they would be partially or completely buried within the lipid bilayer when the protein resides in a membrane environment, in agreement with many residues at the edges of the lateral fenestrations having hydrophobic side chains (Figure 1). However, an acidic residue Glu at the intracellular edge of the lateral fenestrations is conserved in P2X receptors thought to be cation-selective but is substituted with the basic residue Lys in P2X5 (Figure 1), the one subtype of P2X receptor reported to also be anion permeable. This correlation between side chain character and ion selectivity suggested that this residue might face the ion-conducting pathway and contribute directly to ion selectivity. For the E17C mutant in rP2X2 receptors, we found that the positively charged MTSET could readily react with this position, but only when the channel was opened by external ATP (Figure 3). In contrast, the membrane-permeant MTSEA could react with E17C either when the channel was opened by external ATP, or when applied in the closed state in the absence of ATP (Figure 4), indicating that E17C is accessible from both sides of the membrane. Although approximations of P2X receptor channels in the membrane by databases such as OPM suggest that much of the lateral fenestrations are buried in the membrane (Figure 1), the efficient reaction between MTS and E17C (Figure 5) suggests that this residue resides in an aqueous environment and is not buried in the membrane, supporting its location within the ion permeation pathway at the intracellular end of the pore. Importantly, charge-reversing mutations in rP2X2 and mP2X5 clearly alter the relative permeability of the two channels (Figure 6 and Figure 8). Although the effect of the mutation in rP2X2 is unambiguous (Figure 6), the result also suggests that other determinants contribute to cation selectivity for this subtype (Kawate et al., 2011). In stark contrast, the influence of the mutations in mP2X5 (Figure 8) suggests that K17 is a major determinant of anion permeability in that subtype. Viewed collectively, our results support the idea that ion permeation occurs through the lateral fenestrations and that these structural elements play important roles in determining the ion selectivity of P2X receptor channels.

An important question remains about whether the cytoplasmic caps seen in structures of slowly desensitizing hP2X3_Slow receptors in an ATP-bound open state (Mansoor et al., 2016) and those observed in both closed and ATP-bound open states of hP2X7 receptors (McCarthy et al., 2019) are present in other P2X receptor subtypes. Many residues at critical positions in the cytoplasmic cap are conserved in other P2X receptor subtypes (Figure 2; Figure 2—figure supplement 1), supporting the notion that the cap is a conserved feature of P2X receptor channels. Given that the structures of hP2X3_Slow where the cap is seen contain three mutations corresponding to residues present in the slowly desensitizing P2X2 receptor, it would seem likely that the cap will also be present in P2X2 receptors. Our results with MTS accessibility and ion selectivity experiments in P2X2 are consistent with the structure of P2X3_Slow containing the cytoplasmic cap (Hausmann et al., 2014; Mansoor et al., 2016), further supporting the presence of a cap in P2X2 receptors. Similarly, the critical influence of K17 in P2X5 on ion selectivity in that subtype would be consistent with the presence of cytoplasmic cap and lateral fenestrations like those present in the P2X3_Slow structure. Although earlier studies had implicated residues in the outer pore as critical determinants of Ca²⁺ permeability in P2X receptors (Migita et al., 2001; Samways and Egan, 2007; Samways et al., 2014), a recent study also implicated residues in the N-terminus of rP2X7 as determinants of Ca²⁺ permeability (Liang et al., 2019). Indeed, the E17A mutation in rP2X2 and the equivalent E14A mutation in rP2X7 both diminish fractional Ca²⁺ current (Liang et al., 2019), supporting a role of the lateral fenestrations in ion permeation and selectivity. In the future, it would be important to solve structures of other P2X receptor subtypes to ascertain whether the cytoplasmic cap and lateral fenestrations are features common to all subtypes, and to determine whether the cap is a transient structure, as proposed for P2X3 receptors (Mansoor et al., 2016) or a more stable one as proposed for P2X7 (McCarthy et al., 2019).

One of the unique features seen in structures of detergent-solubilized P2X receptor channels with ATP bound is that the lateral fenestrations present on both sides of the membrane, which enable ions to enter or exit the pore (Kawate et al., 2011), are continuous and present throughout the region likely spanning the lipid membrane (Figure 1A and B). As a result, the TM helices lack intersubunit interactions within the membrane and all intersubunit interactions occur within the large extracellular domain and within the cytoplasmic cap. Related membrane-embedded fenestrations have thus far not been observed in structures of other trimeric ion channels under conditions where the open state predominates, including acid-sensing ion channels (Jasti et al., 2007; Gonzales et al., 2009; Baconguis et al., 2014; Yoder et al., 2018; Yoder and Gouaux, 2020), epithelial sodium channels (Noreng et al., 2018; Noreng et al., 2020) or proton-activated chloride channels (Ruan et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2022). It will be interesting to solve structures of P2X receptor channels in a membrane environment to better understand whether membrane-embedded fenestrations are native features, whether lipids may play key structural roles in stabilizing membrane-spanning subunits or whether the fenestrations might distort the structure of the membrane to enable efficient permeation of ions through the internal end of the pore.

It will also be fascinating to explore how the ion selectivity of P2X receptor channel subtypes has been tuned to underlie distinct physiological functions in different cellular environments. Although, many important roles of cation-selective subtype of P2X receptors are emerging, the functions of the anion permeable P2X5 receptor remain largely enigmatic (Khakh and North, 2006; Surprenant and North, 2009; Schmid and Evans, 2019). P2X5 is thought to be widely expressed within neurons in the central nervous system (Guo et al., 2008) as well as in cardiac and skeletal muscle (Garcia-Guzman et al., 1996; Ryten et al., 2001), yet what roles this channel plays will require further investigation. The unique ion selectivity of P2X5 receptors, determined by one critical residue within the lateral fenestrations, suggests that it may play very different roles than other P2X receptor subtypes.

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in this paper are available in the main text and supplementary materials.

1. 1. Baconguis I
   2. Bohlen CJ
   3. Goehring A
   4. Julius D
   5. Gouaux E

   (2014) X-Ray structure of acid-sensing ion channel 1-snake toxin complex reveals open state of a Na (+) -selective channel

   Cell 156:717–729.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.011

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Bo X
   2. Jiang LH
   3. Wilson HL
   4. Kim M
   5. Burnstock G
   6. Surprenant A
   7. North RA

   (2003) Pharmacological and biophysical properties of the human P2X5 receptor

   Molecular Pharmacology 63:1407–1416.

   https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.63.6.1407

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Brake AJ
   2. Wagenbach MJ
   3. Julius D

   (1994) New structural motif for ligand-gated ion channels defined by an ionotropic ATP receptor

   Nature 371:519–523.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/371519a0

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Clyne JD
   2. Wang LF
   3. Hume RI

   (2002) Mutational analysis of the conserved cysteines of the rat P2X2 purinoceptor

   The Journal of Neuroscience 22:3873–3880.

   https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-10-03873.2002

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Egan TM
   2. Khakh BS

   (2004) Contribution of calcium ions to P2X channel responses

   The Journal of Neuroscience 24:3413–3420.

   https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5429-03.2004

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Ennion SJ
   2. Evans RJ

   (2002) Conserved cysteine residues in the extracellular loop of the human P2X (1) receptor form disulfide bonds and are involved in receptor trafficking to the cell surface

   Molecular Pharmacology 61:303–311.

   https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.61.2.303

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Fujiwara Y
   2. Kubo Y

   (2004) Density-Dependent changes of the pore properties of the P2X2 receptor channel

   The Journal of Physiology 558:31–43.

   https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2004.064568

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Garcia-Guzman M
   2. Soto F
   3. Laube B
   4. Stühmer W

   (1996) Molecular cloning and functional expression of a novel rat heart P2X purinoceptor

   FEBS Letters 388:123–127.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(96)00499-1

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. George B
   2. Swartz KJ
   3. Li M

   (2019) Hearing loss mutations alter the functional properties of human P2X2 receptor channels through distinct mechanisms

   PNAS 116:22862–22871.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912156116

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Gonzales EB
    2. Kawate T
    3. Gouaux E

    (2009) Pore architecture and ion sites in acid-sensing ion channels and P2X receptors

    Nature 460:599–604.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08218

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Guo W
    2. Xu X
    3. Gao X
    4. Burnstock G
    5. He C
    6. Xiang Z

    (2008) Expression of P2X5 receptors in the mouse CNS

    Neuroscience 156:673–692.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.07.062

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Hattori M
    2. Gouaux E

    (2012) Molecular mechanism of ATP binding and ion channel activation in P2X receptors

    Nature 485:207–212.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11010

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Hausmann R
    2. Bahrenberg G
    3. Kuhlmann D
    4. Schumacher M
    5. Braam U
    6. Bieler D
    7. Schlusche I
    8. Schmalzing G

    (2014) A hydrophobic residue in position 15 of the rP2X3 receptor slows desensitization and reveals properties beneficial for pharmacological analysis and high-throughput screening

    Neuropharmacology 79:603–615.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.01.010

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Heymann G
    2. Dai J
    3. Li M
    4. Silberberg SD
    5. Zhou HX
    6. Swartz KJ

    (2013) Inter- and intrasubunit interactions between transmembrane helices in the open state of P2X receptor channels

    PNAS 110:E4045–E4054.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1311071110

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. Conference

    1. Hille B

    (2001) Ion channels of excitable membranes

    Ciba Foundation Symposium. pp. 191–203.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470720134.ch11

    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Holmgren M
    2. Liu Y
    3. Xu Y
    4. Yellen G

    (1996) On the use of thiol-modifying agents to determine channel topology

    Neuropharmacology 35:797–804.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3908(96)00129-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Illes P
    2. Müller CE
    3. Jacobson KA
    4. Grutter T
    5. Nicke A
    6. Fountain SJ
    7. Kennedy C
    8. Schmalzing G
    9. Jarvis MF
    10. Stojilkovic SS
    11. King BF
    12. Di Virgilio F

    (2021) Update of P2X receptor properties and their pharmacology: IUPHAR review 30

    British Journal of Pharmacology 178:489–514.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.15299

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Jasti J
    2. Furukawa H
    3. Gonzales EB
    4. Gouaux E

    (2007) Structure of acid-sensing ion channel 1 at 1.9 A resolution and low pH

    Nature 449:316–323.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06163

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Jiang LH
    2. Rassendren F
    3. Spelta V
    4. Surprenant A
    5. North RA

    (2001) Amino acid residues involved in gating identified in the first membrane-spanning domain of the rat P2X (2) receptor

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 276:14902–14908.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M011327200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Kasuya G
    2. Fujiwara Y
    3. Takemoto M
    4. Dohmae N
    5. Nakada-Nakura Y
    6. Ishitani R
    7. Hattori M
    8. Nureki O

    (2016) Structural insights into divalent cation modulations of ATP-gated P2X receptor channels

    Cell Reports 14:932–944.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.087

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Kawate T
    2. Michel JC
    3. Birdsong WT
    4. Gouaux E

    (2009) Crystal structure of the ATP-gated P2X (4) ion channel in the closed state

    Nature 460:592–598.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08198

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Kawate T
    2. Robertson JL
    3. Li M
    4. Silberberg SD
    5. Swartz KJ

    (2011) Ion access pathway to the transmembrane pore in P2X receptor channels

    The Journal of General Physiology 137:579–590.

    https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201010593

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Khakh BS
    2. North RA

    (2006) P2X receptors as cell-surface ATP sensors in health and disease

    Nature 442:527–532.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04886

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Lê KT
    2. Babinski K
    3. Séguéla P

    (1998) Central P2X4 and P2X6 channel subunits coassemble into a novel heteromeric ATP receptor

    The Journal of Neuroscience 18:7152–7159.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-18-07152.1998

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Li M
    2. Chang TH
    3. Silberberg SD
    4. Swartz KJ

    (2008) Gating the pore of P2X receptor channels

    Nature Neuroscience 11:883–887.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2151

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Li M.
    2. Kawate T
    3. Silberberg SD
    4. Swartz KJ

    (2010) Pore-Opening mechanism in trimeric P2X receptor channels

    Nature Communications 1:44.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1048

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Li M
    2. Toombes GES
    3. Silberberg SD
    4. Swartz KJ

    (2015) Physical basis of apparent pore dilation of atp-activated p2x receptor channels

    Nature Neuroscience 18:1577–1583.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4120

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Li M
    2. Wang Y
    3. Banerjee R
    4. Marinelli F
    5. Silberberg S
    6. Faraldo-Gómez JD
    7. Hattori M
    8. Swartz KJ

    (2019) Molecular mechanisms of human P2X3 receptor channel activation and modulation by divalent cation bound ATP

    eLife 8:e47060.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47060

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Liang X
    2. Samways DSK
    3. Cox J
    4. Egan TM

    (2019) Ca2+ flux through splice variants of the ATP-gated ionotropic receptor P2X7 is regulated by its cytoplasmic N terminus

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 294:12521–12533.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA119.009666

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Lomize MA
    2. Pogozheva ID
    3. Joo H
    4. Mosberg HI
    5. Lomize AL

    (2012) OPM database and PPM web server: resources for positioning of proteins in membranes

    Nucleic Acids Research 40:D370–D376.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr703

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Mansoor SE
    2. Lü W
    3. Oosterheert W
    4. Shekhar M
    5. Tajkhorshid E
    6. Gouaux E

    (2016) X-Ray structures define human P2X (3) receptor gating cycle and antagonist action

    Nature 538:66–71.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19367

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. McCarthy AE
    2. Yoshioka C
    3. Mansoor SE

    (2019) Full-Length P2X7 structures reveal how palmitoylation prevents channel desensitization

    Cell 179:659–670.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.017

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Migita K
    2. Haines WR
    3. Voigt MM
    4. Egan TM

    (2001) Polar residues of the second transmembrane domain influence cation permeability of the ATP-gated P2X (2) receptor

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 276:30934–30941.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M103366200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Noreng S
    2. Bharadwaj A
    3. Posert R
    4. Yoshioka C
    5. Baconguis I

    (2018) Structure of the human epithelial sodium channel by cryo-electron microscopy

    eLife 7:e39340.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39340

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Noreng S
    2. Posert R
    3. Bharadwaj A
    4. Houser A
    5. Baconguis I

    (2020) Molecular principles of assembly, activation, and inhibition in epithelial sodium channel

    eLife 9:e59038.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59038

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. North RA

    (2002) Molecular physiology of P2X receptors

    Physiological Reviews 82:1013–1067.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00015.2002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Ruan Z
    2. Osei-Owusu J
    3. Du J
    4. Qiu Z
    5. Lü W

    (2020) Structures and pH-sensing mechanism of the proton-activated chloride channel

    Nature 588:350–354.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2875-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Ruppelt A
    2. Ma W
    3. Borchardt K
    4. Silberberg SD
    5. Soto F

    (2001) Genomic structure, developmental distribution and functional properties of the chicken P2X (5) receptor

    Journal of Neurochemistry 77:1256–1265.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00348.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Ryten M
    2. Hoebertz A
    3. Burnstock G

    (2001) Sequential expression of three receptor subtypes for extracellular ATP in developing rat skeletal muscle

    Developmental Dynamics 221:331–341.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.1147

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Samways DSK
    2. Egan TM

    (2007) Acidic amino acids impart enhanced Ca2+ permeability and flux in two members of the ATP-gated P2X receptor family

    The Journal of General Physiology 129:245–256.

    https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200609677

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Samways DSK
    2. Khakh BS
    3. Dutertre S
    4. Egan TM

    (2011) Preferential use of unobstructed lateral portals as the access route to the pore of human ATP-gated ion channels (P2X receptors)

    PNAS 108:13800–13805.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1017550108

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Samways DSK
    2. Li Z
    3. Egan TM

    (2014) Principles and properties of ion flow in P2X receptors

    Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 8:6.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2014.00006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Schmid R
    2. Evans RJ

    (2019) Atp-Gated P2X receptor channels: molecular insights into functional roles

    Annual Review of Physiology 81:43–62.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-020518-114259

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Sun LF
    2. Liu Y
    3. Wang J
    4. Huang LD
    5. Yang Y
    6. Cheng XY
    7. Fan YZ
    8. Zhu MX
    9. Liang H
    10. Tian Y
    11. Wang HS
    12. Guo CR
    13. Yu Y

    (2019) Altered allostery of the left flipper domain underlies the weak ATP response of rat P2X5 receptors

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 294:19589–19603.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA119.009959

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Surprenant A
    2. North RA

    (2009) Signaling at purinergic P2X receptors

    Annual Review of Physiology 71:333–359.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.70.113006.100630

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Wang C
    2. Polovitskaya MM
    3. Delgado BD
    4. Jentsch TJ
    5. Long SB

    (2022) Gating choreography and mechanism of the human proton-activated chloride channel ASOR

    Science Advances 8:eabm3942.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abm3942

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Yoder N
    2. Yoshioka C
    3. Gouaux E

    (2018) Gating mechanisms of acid-sensing ion channels

    Nature 555:397–401.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25782

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Yoder N
    2. Gouaux E

    (2020) The his-gly motif of acid-sensing ion channels resides in a reentrant “ loop ” implicated in gating and ion selectivity

    eLife 9:e56527.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56527

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Zhou Z
    2. Hume RI

    (1998) Two mechanisms for inward rectification of current flow through the purinoceptor P2X2 class of ATP-gated channels

    The Journal of Physiology 507 (Pt 2):353–364.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.353bt.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Stephanie W Tam

   Molecular Physiology and Biophysics Section, Porter Neuroscience Research Center, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5395-9408

2. Kate Huffer

   1. Molecular Physiology and Biophysics Section, Porter Neuroscience Research Center, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
   2. Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5003-3140

3. Mufeng Li

   Molecular Physiology and Biophysics Section, Porter Neuroscience Research Center, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Validation, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Kenton J Swartz

   Molecular Physiology and Biophysics Section, Porter Neuroscience Research Center, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration

   For correspondence

   swartzk@ninds.nih.gov

   Competing interests

   Senior editor, eLife

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3419-0765

• 974

  views

• 140

  downloads

• 8

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.