Metamorphosis: The making of a maggot brain
The way neurons in the brain rewire in larvae as they turn to adult fruit flies sheds light on how complete metamorphosis was ‘invented’ over the course of evolution.
- Institute of Biology, University of Leipzig, Germany
- Department Genetics of Learning and Memory, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Germany
Want a new life? And a new body? What sounds like a Faustian bargain is business as usual for animals with a complete metamorphosis, such as butterflies, bees or fruit flies. Once hatched from an egg, these insects spend their ‘first life’ as soft-bodied crawling larvae, dedicated to feeding and growing, and their ‘second life’ as hard-shelled adult insects with genitalia and wings, dedicated to reproduction.
The evolutionary origins of such a remarkable, complete metamorphosis, and how it happens over the course of an animal’s development, has fascinated humankind for more than 2,000 years (Truman, 2019; Reynolds, 2019). Evolutionarily ancestral insects undergo no such metamorphosis (Truman and Riddiford, 2019; Belles, 2019). Juvenile grasshoppers, for example, do not have a larval phase and instead emerge as miniature adults that lack wings and working reproductive organs. They then molt multiple times before developing into a full-size, sexually mature adult (Figure 1A). More modern insects, however, do not transition from a larva to an adult in such a continuous manner: when their larval life ends, they establish a pupal case to allow the larval body to dissolve and the adult body to take shape. Complete metamorphosis thus required evolving a detour from the direct, evolutionarily ancestral trajectory to first form the larva, and then returning back to the ancestral pathway to develop the adult body (Figure 1B).
Figure 1
Evolutionary origins of metamorphosis.
(A) Complete metamorphosis – where an animal goes through a larval and pupal life stage before developing into an adult – appeared relatively late in the insect evolutionary family tree during the advent of winged insects from the Pterygota family. It is the defining feature of a group of insects known as the Holometabola, which includes butterflies and flies (shown on the right). Hemimetabolous insects, such as grasshoppers (shown on the left), on the other hand, emerge as nymphs that look like adults (except for their lack of wings and genitalia), and gradually develop into mature adults after a series of molts. (B) Top: Development in evolutionarily ancestral insects, such as grasshoppers, follows a straight trajectory (black line). From the egg hatches a miniature and sexually immature version of the adult that eventually develops via multiple growth molts (not shown). Bottom: In insects with complete metamorphosis, development involves a detour away from the ancestral trajectory (magenta) to establish a larva. Development resumes back towards the evolutionarily ancestral trajectory (green) via a pupal stage (not shown), giving rise to the adult fly. The horizontal grey arrow indicates the so-called imaginal discs – cells that are stored and arrested early during development – to be available later for establishing the adult fly.
This, however, poses a problem for the development of the brain. Ancestral insects with a direct development trajectory essentially possess a miniature adult brain as soon as they hatch. But making a larval stage requires adjusting the brain and the connections within it to this new, larval way of life. Now, in eLife, James Truman, Jacquelyn Price, Rosa Miyares, and Tzumin Lee from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute report new insights into the process of metamorphosis by studying the brains of fruit flies (Truman et al., 2023).
To find out more about how brain circuits change during metamorphosis, the researchers focused on a brain structure important for learning and memory in insects, called the mushroom body, and the interneurons located within this region. Their experiments revealed a stunning diversity of fates as these interneurons go through this turbulent process. Some cells die and are replaced, while others survive metamorphosis and become integrated into the adult mushroom body in much the same way as in the larva. Other neurons survive and remain in the mushroom body but are integrated in a completely different way, and some survive but have a completely different role in a different brain region.
One hurdle larvae face is that when development detours from the ancestral trajectory, few neurons are mature enough to assume a functional role. Indeed, the number of functional neurons in the larva is only about a tenth of the adult number. To make a larval brain that is nevertheless functionally complete, cellular redundancy is sacrificed wherever possible, i.e., specific tasks that require multiple neurons working in parallel in adults, are served by only one neuron in the larva. The problem, however, is that some neurons are functionally necessary but not yet mature, whereas others are mature but not needed.
The solutions can be spectacularly pragmatic. For example, a neuron known as MBON-g1 is stopped in its tracks towards its adult, ancestral fate and is instead recruited to the larval mushroom body, where it is involved in associative learning. When development resumes the ancestral trajectory (i.e., as the pupa morphs into an adult), tMBON-g1 retreats from the mushroom body and takes on its original mission in another, now rapidly developing brain structure for navigation, called the central complex.
As a result of the diverse fates neurons can take on during metamorphosis, the anatomical relationships between the modulatory input and output neurons of the mushroom body are profoundly altered during the pupal stage. These relationships are important for associative learning, and it therefore seems as if associative memories established during larval life would be ‘deliberately’ wiped out – or would at least get massively reconfigured – as development resumes (Aso et al., 2014a; Aso et al., 2014b, Saumweber et al., 2018).
Although the connections between the specific neurons change, important general features of the mushroom body do not. For example, learning about rewards and punishments takes place in segregated regional lobes of the mushroom body in both the larva and adult fly.
Recent studies have further shown that a gene called chinmo – together with two other genes – organizes the developmental rollercoaster that allows to make a larva, which then transitions, via the pupal stage, to an adult fly (Truman and Riddiford, 2022; Williams and Kafatos, 1971). Together, these studies provide valuable insight into the evolutionary making of two lives out of one. However, exactly how this gene trio ensures that the neurons in the brain are properly remodeled remains to be determined (Meltzer and Schuldiner, 2020).
It would also be interesting to see if it is possible to pinpoint the specific mutations in these genes that eventually led to the evolution of complete metamorphosis, and how these genetic mechanisms compare to other animals going through a similar transition, such as some amphibians. Would this uncover similar principles for animals cycling through sessile and mobile stages, such as cnidarians, or through different hosts, such as parasites? Clearly, studies investigating how developmental processes change over the course of evolution (like the paper by Truman et al.) have a bright future.
References
-
The innovation of the final moult and the origin of insect metamorphosisPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 374:20180415.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0415
-
With a little help from my friends: how intercellular communication shapes neuronal remodelingCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology 63:23–30.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2020.01.018
-
Cooking up the perfect insect: Aristotle’s transformational idea about the complete metamorphosis of insectsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 374:20190074.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0074
-
The evolution of insect metamorphosisCurrent Biology 29:R1252–R1268.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.10.009
-
The evolution of insect metamorphosis: a developmental and endocrine viewPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 374:20190070.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0070
-
BookTheoretical aspects of the action of juvenile hormoneIn: Menn JJ, Beroza M, editors. Insect Juvenile Hormones. Academic Press. pp. 151–162.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-490950-2.50007-3
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2023, Thum and Gerber
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,854
- views
-
- 116
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Metamorphosis: The making of a maggot brain
eLife 12:e86696.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86696
Further reading
-
- Chromosomes and Gene Expression
- Developmental Biology
Differentiation of female germline stem cells into a mature oocyte includes the expression of RNAs and proteins that drive early embryonic development in Drosophila. We have little insight into what activates the expression of these maternal factors. One candidate is the zinc-finger protein OVO. OVO is required for female germline viability and has been shown to positively regulate its own expression, as well as a downstream target, ovarian tumor, by binding to the transcriptional start site (TSS). To find additional OVO targets in the female germline and further elucidate OVO’s role in oocyte development, we performed ChIP-seq to determine genome-wide OVO occupancy, as well as RNA-seq comparing hypomorphic and wild type rescue ovo alleles. OVO preferentially binds in close proximity to target TSSs genome-wide, is associated with open chromatin, transcriptionally active histone marks, and OVO-dependent expression. Motif enrichment analysis on OVO ChIP peaks identified a 5’-TAACNGT-3’ OVO DNA binding motif spatially enriched near TSSs. However, the OVO DNA binding motif does not exhibit precise motif spacing relative to the TSS characteristic of RNA polymerase II complex binding core promoter elements. Integrated genomics analysis showed that 525 genes that are bound and increase in expression downstream of OVO are known to be essential maternally expressed genes. These include genes involved in anterior/posterior/germ plasm specification (bcd, exu, swa, osk, nos, aub, pgc, gcl), egg activation (png, plu, gnu, wisp, C(3)g, mtrm), translational regulation (cup, orb, bru1, me31B), and vitelline membrane formation (fs(1)N, fs(1)M3, clos). This suggests that OVO is a master transcriptional regulator of oocyte development and is responsible for the expression of structural components of the egg as well as maternally provided RNAs that are required for early embryonic development.
-
- Developmental Biology
Over the past several decades, a trend toward delayed childbirth has led to increases in parental age at the time of conception. Sperm epigenome undergoes age-dependent changes increasing risks of adverse conditions in offspring conceived by fathers of advanced age. The mechanism(s) linking paternal age with epigenetic changes in sperm remain unknown. The sperm epigenome is shaped in a compartment protected by the blood-testes barrier (BTB) known to deteriorate with age. Permeability of the BTB is regulated by the balance of two mTOR complexes in Sertoli cells where mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) promotes the opening of the BTB and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) promotes its integrity. We hypothesized that this balance is also responsible for age-dependent changes in the sperm epigenome. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed reproductive outcomes, including sperm DNA methylation in transgenic mice with Sertoli cell-specific suppression of mTORC1 (Rptor KO) or mTORC2 (Rictor KO). mTORC2 suppression accelerated aging of the sperm DNA methylome and resulted in a reproductive phenotype concordant with older age, including decreased testes weight and sperm counts, and increased percent of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa and mitochondrial DNA copy number. Suppression of mTORC1 resulted in the shift of DNA methylome in sperm opposite to the shift associated with physiological aging – sperm DNA methylome rejuvenation and mild changes in sperm parameters. These results demonstrate for the first time that the balance of mTOR complexes in Sertoli cells regulates the rate of sperm epigenetic aging. Thus, mTOR pathway in Sertoli cells may be used as a novel target of therapeutic interventions to rejuvenate the sperm epigenome in advanced-age fathers.
