Pharmacological inhibition of CLK2 activates YAP by promoting alternative splicing of AMOTL2
eLife assessment
This paper reports important findings on a potent activator of the YAP pathway, demonstrating its mechanism through alternative splicing changes. The authors provide convincing evidence to support their claims. This research is of interest to biologists studying alternative splicing or the Hippo pathway, with significant implications for medical research.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88508.3.sa0Important: Findings that have theoretical or practical implications beyond a single subfield
- Landmark
- Fundamental
- Important
- Valuable
- Useful
Convincing: Appropriate and validated methodology in line with current state-of-the-art
- Exceptional
- Compelling
- Convincing
- Solid
- Incomplete
- Inadequate
During the peer-review process the editor and reviewers write an eLife Assessment that summarises the significance of the findings reported in the article (on a scale ranging from landmark to useful) and the strength of the evidence (on a scale ranging from exceptional to inadequate). Learn more about eLife Assessments
Abstract
Yes-associated protein (YAP), the downstream effector of the evolutionarily conserved Hippo pathway, promotes cellular proliferation and coordinates certain regenerative responses in mammals. Small molecule activators of YAP may, therefore, display therapeutic utility in treating disease states involving insufficient proliferative repair. From a high-throughput chemical screen of the comprehensive drug repurposing library ReFRAME, here we report the identification of SM04690, a clinical stage inhibitor of CLK2, as a potent activator of YAP-driven transcriptional activity in cells. CLK2 inhibition promotes alternative splicing of the Hippo pathway protein AMOTL2, producing an exon-skipped gene product that can no longer associate with membrane-bound proteins, resulting in decreased phosphorylation and membrane localization of YAP. This study reveals a novel mechanism by which pharmacological perturbation of alternative splicing inactivates the Hippo pathway and promotes YAP-dependent cellular growth.
Introduction
The evolutionarily and functionally conserved Hippo signaling pathway functions as a master regulator of cellular proliferation and tissue growth in animals. Molecularly, the Hippo pathway is composed of a kinase cascade that catalyzes a series of phosphorylation events at the plasma membrane. The core pathway includes Ste20-like kinase 1 (MST1) and MST2, which phosphorylate and activate large tumor suppressor kinase 1 (LATS1) and LATS2 (Wu et al., 2003; Xu et al., 1995). LATS1/2 phosphorylation results in the phosphorylation of downstream effector Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP), leading to its cytoplasmic retention and inactivation (Huang et al., 2005). Several other proteins work together to regulate the core kinase cascade, such as Salvador homolog 1 (SAV1) and MOB kinase activator 1 A and 1B (MOB1A/B), binders of MST1/2 and LATS1/2, respectively (Udan et al., 2003; Lai et al., 2005). In addition to phosphorylation-dependent regulation of the Hippo pathway, YAP is also regulated by protein-protein interactions, such as with the angiomotin family of proteins (AMOT, AMOTL1, and AMOTL2), which directly bind to and cause the localization of YAP at tight junctions (Wang et al., 2011). Adherens junctions and tight junctions are important sites of Hippo pathway regulation that link to the core kinases of the Hippo pathway through the AMOT proteins. When the Hippo pathway is inactivated, YAP translocates to the nucleus, acting as a transcriptional co-activator of TEA domain transcription factors (TEADs), which increases the transcription of genes involved in cellular proliferation and survival.
Regulation of the Hippo pathway by cell-cell contacts, metabolic changes, and diverse extrinsic inputs results in decreased activity of YAP, which prevents organ overgrowth and abnormal cellular proliferation (Yu and Guan, 2013). On the other hand, YAP activity is also critical in healing injury by augmenting cellular proliferation and survival. While many multicellular organisms can repair wounded or damaged organs, mammalian regeneration is more limited, as many adult tissues lack the capacity to regenerate. Genetic activation of YAP, either by genetic inactivation of upstream Hippo pathway proteins or by forced overexpression of YAP, has been shown to enhance endogenous repair in wounded tissues. For example, hepatic knockdown of MST1/2 with small interfering RNA (siRNA) in the mouse after partial hepatectomy augments regeneration of the liver via YAP-dependent hepatocyte proliferation (Loforese et al., 2017). Likewise, in the skin, YAP is essential for regenerative wound repair, as siRNA-mediated knockdown of YAP markedly delays wound closure (Lee et al., 2014). Conversely, conditional hyperactivation of YAP enhances the proliferation of epidermal keratinocytes, thickening the epidermal layer of neonatal mice (Zhang et al., 2011). Lastly, in the heart, an organ previously considered to have no regenerative potential post-development, conditional SAV deletion promotes the proliferation of cardiomyocytes and reverses deficits in ejection fraction volume post-myocardial infarction (Leach et al., 2017). Collectively, these studies suggest that small molecule activators of YAP may, therefore, display therapeutic utility in treating diseases etiologically defined by an insufficient proliferative response.
We recently reported the identification of PY-60, a small molecule that activates YAP by binding to a membrane-binding scaffolding protein, annexin A2 (ANXA2), which we defined as a central component of the Hippo pathway (Shalhout et al., 2021). This study suggested to us that likely many other druggable mechanisms exist for activating YAP including those associated with previously drugged cellular proteins. Here, to explore the hypothesis that known drugs might activate YAP-driven transcriptional activity, we performed a reporter-based screen of the comprehensive drug repurposing library ReFRAME. We found that SM04690, a small molecule kinase inhibitor in clinical trials for the treatment of osteoarthritis, activates YAP with nanomolar potency in cells. Mechanistic studies revealed the relevant target kinase of SM04690 to be CDC-like Kinase 2 (CLK2), inhibition of which induces alternative splicing of Hippo signaling component AMOTL2 that can no longer localize YAP to the plasma membrane, in effect activating YAP.
Results
Screening of the ReFRAME library
To identify small molecule activators of YAP, we screened the Repurposing, Focused Rescue, and Accelerated Medchem (ReFRAME) small molecule library using a HEK293A cell line with a stably integrated cassette of eight copies of the TEAD-binding element upstream of luciferase (293A-TEAD-LUC). This library contains ~13,000 small molecules that have undergone substantial preclinical evaluation and clinical development are FDA-approved (Figure 1A; Janes et al., 2018). The screen was conducted using a previously validated assay in 1,536-well format at three compound concentrations (200 nM, 2 µM, and 10 µM) to maximize the potential number of mechanisms surveyed. Hit compounds were defined if they displayed increases in TEAD-LUC signal of more than five robust Z scores above the mean plate signal (Figure 1B). Identified hits could be grouped into several classes of inhibitors including known nonspecific modulators of transcription (e.g. bromodomain inhibitors, histone deacetylase inhibitors), ion channel modulators, and kinase inhibitors, among others (Figure 1C). Of these, we identified 15 kinase inhibitors that did not have any associated YAP augmenting activity and are not characterized inhibitors of MST1/2 and LATS1/2. Evaluating these 15 hits in dose response using the original screening assay with library material, we confirmed nine displayed reproducible YAP activation (Figure 1D). Of these, three were inhibitors of non-receptor tyrosine kinases including Cerdulatinib (inhibitor of SYK and JAK paralogs Coffey et al., 2014; TEAD-LUC EC50=0.31 µM), Peficitinib (a pan JAK inhibitor Nakada and Oda, 2015; TEAD-LUC EC50=2.4 µM), and KX02 (an inhibitor of SRC family kinases Tu et al., 2012; TEAD-LUC EC50=3.7 µM). Also identified as efficacious YAP activators were XL-999 (a pan RTK inhibitor, TEAD-LUC EC50=1.5 µM) and CEP-1347 (a JNK family inhibitor; TEAD-LUC EC50=2.5 µM). Two inhibitors of the AGC family of kinases were also identified, namely GSK690693 (Rhodes et al., 2008) (TEAD-LUC EC50 >20 µM) and AT13148 (Yap et al., 2012) (TEAD-LUC EC50 >20 µM). Lastly, we identified two inhibitors of CLK and DYRK family kinases including SM04690 (Deshmukh et al., 2018) (TEAD-LUC EC50=5.7 µM) and SM04646 (TEAD-LUC EC50=2.1 µM), which had been initially described as agents which inhibit canonical Wnt signaling and induce differentiation of chondrocytes. Among these, we chose to further characterize SM04690, which is in clinical trials for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee, as no association of its target kinases had previously been reported as related to Hippo pathway signaling (Deshmukh et al., 2018; Yazici et al., 2017).
SM04690 is a YAP activator
We first confirmed the YAP-stimulating activity of SM04690 in 384-well format using 293A-TEAD-LUC cells with fresh, commercially obtained material, finding that the compound dose-dependently increased TEAD-LUC reporter activity with an EC50 of 1.2 nM, a value considerably more potent than that observed in the screening assay (Figure 2A). We next confirmed that SM04690 functionally activated a YAP driven transcriptional program, as SM04690 was found to significantly increase the levels of YAP-controlled transcripts ANKRD1 and CTGF (Figure 2B). Likewise, SM04690 treatment markedly decreased phosphorylation of YAP, as SM04690 was found to decrease immunopositivity dose-dependently to anti-phospho-YAP in Western blotting experiments following 24 hr compound treatment (Figure 2C). We next knocked down YAP transcript using shRNA and found that 1 µM compound treatment failed to increase ANKRD1 and CTGF transcript levels in the absence of YAP, suggesting the compound activates a YAP-dependent transcriptional program (Figure 2D). We additionally observed by immunofluorescent imaging that YAP localized to the nucleus in MDCK cells treated with SM04690 (1 µM, 24 hr), suggesting that compound treatment promotes nuclear translocation and activation of YAP. This is in comparison to diffuse plasma membrane and cytoplasm YAP localization in DMSO-treated cells (Figure 2E and F). Lastly, since pharmacological YAP activators have been shown to promote the expansion of cells, we tested 0.2 nM SM04690 treatment in immortalized human keratinocytes (HaCaT) over 7 days and found treatment promoted clonal expansion, as seen with rhodamine B staining and increased nuclei counts (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A, B). Importantly, these proliferative effects occur at a non-cytotoxic concentration (under 0.5 nM) of SM04690 treatment (Figure 2—figure supplement 1C).
CLK2 is the relevant cellular target of SM04690
SM04690 was first described in the literature as an inhibitor of Wnt signaling capable of promoting differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells to chondrocytes (Deshmukh et al., 2018). Following work defined SM04690 as an inhibitor of several subfamilies of related CMGC family protein kinases (Deshmukh et al., 2019), including Dual Specificity Tyrosine Phosphorylation Regulated Kinase (DYRK) and CDC Like Kinase (CLK) subfamilies (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A). Specifically, SM04690 has been shown to inhibit CLK2, CLK3, DYRK1A and B, Homeodomain Interacting Protein Kinase 1 (HIPK1), and HIPK2 with over 90% inhibition at 500 nM (Deshmukh et al., 2019). As such, we hypothesized that inhibiting one of these targets was likely responsible for modulating YAP activity. Previously published transcript expression data from our lab indicated that among the targets of SM04690 only CLK2, DYRK1B, HIPK1, and HIPK2 are expressed in HEK293A cells, helping to narrow our search (Figure 3—figure supplement 1B; Shalhout et al., 2021). We then treated 293A-TEAD-LUC cells with structurally distinct small molecule inhibitors of these putative targets to see if other treatments of cells with inhibitors to the potential target might recapitulate the YAP activating effect of SM04690. We found that only inhibitors targeting CLK2 (CC671, CLK-in-T3, and T025) elicited a dose-dependent increase in YAP activity (Figure 3—figure supplement 1C). In contrast, inhibitors targeting DYRKs (Harmine, INDY, and Leucettine L41) and CLK4 (ML167, TG003) showed no activity at concentrations over multiple orders of magnitude (Figure 3—figure supplement 1D). To confirm CLK2 as the relevant target of SM04690, we knocked down CLK2 by approximately 50% using three different targeting shRNAs, all of which increased YAP-controlled transcripts ANKRD1, CTGF, and CYR61 to varying degrees (Figure 3A and B). Collectively, these data strongly suggested that CLK2 was most likely the target of SM04690 responsible for activating YAP.
-
Figure 3—source data 1
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88508/elife-88508-fig3-data1-v1.xlsx
-
Figure 3—source data 2
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88508/elife-88508-fig3-data2-v1.zip
-
Figure 3—source data 3
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88508/elife-88508-fig3-data3-v1.zip
CLK2 is a protein kinase that phosphorylates serine/arginine-rich (SR) proteins of the spliceosomal complex, which play an important role in exon selection by the spliceosome (Jeong, 2017; Long and Caceres, 2009). The phosphorylation states of SR proteins dictate their subcellular localization and interactions with pre-mRNA (da Silva et al., 2015). When CLK2 is inhibited, SR proteins are not phosphorylated, leading to alternative splicing that is most often exon skipping (Salvador and Gomis, 2018). Previous work using pharmacological CLK2 inhibitors revealed that inhibiting SR phosphorylation had a marked transcriptome-wide effect on altering alternative splicing. Interestingly, the third most skipped exon of the transcriptome in response to CLK2 inhibition corresponded to exon 5 of Angiomotin-like 2 (AMOTL2), as nearly 3,000 new junction reads between non-neighboring exons were observed in this study (Araki et al., 2015; Figure 3—figure supplement 2). Exon 9 of AMOTL2 was also skipped but to a lesser extent with around 700 new junction reads. AMOTL2 is part of the AMOT family of proteins and is crucial to the tight junction localization of YAP through direct interaction with YAP’s WW domain (Wang et al., 2011). Notably, the knockdown of AMOTL2 decreases the content of tight junction-localized YAP, instead promoting YAP translocation to the nucleus (Zhao et al., 2011). Given the central role that AMOTL2 plays in regulating YAP as well as the observation that no other canonical Hippo pathway member displayed alternative splicing in response to CLK2 inhibition, we hypothesized that SM04690 most likely increased YAP activity through modulating AMOTL2 splicing.
SM04690 induces alternative splicing of AMOTL2
We first confirmed that SM04690 treatment results in alternative splicing of AMOTL2. Consistent with reported literature, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) revealed that 24 hr SM04690 treatment at 1 µM induces exon skipping for exon 5 by 629-fold and exon 9 by 80-fold when compared to untreated samples (Figure 3C, Figure 3—figure supplement 3B). The skipping of exons 5 and 9 was observed as low as 10 nM with 24 hr treatment of SM04690 (Figure 3—figure supplement 3A). Using semi-quantitative reverse transcription PCR, in which primers are designed directly flanking an exon, we could visualize the presence of each splice isoform using gel electrophoresis. Exon 5, which is 93 base pairs long, has a PCR amplicon length of 132 base pairs when primer sequences are added on both ends (39 base pairs for both) (Figure 3—figure supplement 3C). Indeed, in the untreated samples, the amplicon ran through the gel to just over 100 base pairs. However, in the sample treated with 100 nM of SM04690, there are two PCR amplicons, one which ran the same distance as the untreated sample and a second band that ran well under 100 base pairs, as only the sequences of the primers were amplified, indicating skipping of exon 5 (Figure 3—figure supplement 3D). Exon 9 is 180 base pairs long with a PCR amplicon length of 218 base pairs with the primer sequences, (Figure 3—figure supplement 3C) which we see in the untreated sample. Like exon 5, in the 100 nM SM04690 treated sample, a second PCR amplicon unique to the treated sample ran under 100 base pairs, indicating the skipping of exon 9 (Figure 3—figure supplement 3D). This experiment thus confirmed that SM04690 treatment of HEK293A cells created exon skipping of exons as indicated by shorter PCR amplicons in treated samples differing from the untreated samples by exactly the length of the missing exon. The presence of exon skipped spliceoforms at the protein level was confirmed by anti-AMOTL2 Western blot using an antibody that can detect each possible spliceoform of AMOTL2. We found that with increasing SM04690 treatment in HEK293A cells for 24 hr, there was the appearance of broad lower molecular weight bands, consistent with the buildup of multiple forms of exon skipped AMOTL2 (Figure 3D). It is important to note that both the RT-qPCR and Western blot not only indicate the increase in alternative splicing but also an increase in the total AMOTL2 present with SM04690 treatment, as the relative transcript level of total AMOTL2 in SM04690 treated cells increased 2.3-fold in the RT-qPCR analysis and the Western blot showed increase bandwidth.
Exon-skipped AMOTL2 activates YAP through a dominant mechanism
AMOTL2 interacts directly with YAP, helping to localize it to the plasma membrane. Accordingly, we next assessed if the exon-skipped gene products might interfere with the ability of AMOTL2 to bind YAP. Using FLAG-tagged transient overexpression constructs of wild-type AMOTL2 (WT), exon 5-skipped AMOTL2 (∆5), exon 9-skipped AMOTL2 (∆9), and double exon-skipped AMOTL2 (∆5∆9) (Figure 3—figure supplement 3E), we performed co-immunoprecipitation studies with HA-tagged YAP at high cell density in HEK293T cells. We found that the three AMOTL2 spliceoforms retained a similar ability to bind YAP as the WT AMOTL2 transgene (Figure 3E). As such, we next assessed if overexpression of the spliceoform transgenes themselves was sufficient to activate YAP. From experiments in HEK293A cells transiently overexpressing WT AMOLT2 or each of the three transgenes (AMOTL2 ∆5, AMOTL2 ∆9, AMOTL2 ∆5∆9), AMOTL2 ∆5∆9 uniquely displayed 1.5–2 times higher levels of YAP controlled transcripts in comparison to cell overexpressing WT AMOTL2 (Figure 3F). In contrast, no transcriptional induction was observed by expression of AMOTL2 ∆5 and only a minor induction of ANKRD1 was observed for AMOTL2 ∆9, suggesting the AMOTL2 ∆5∆9 spliceoform likely has a stronger YAP activating effect than either skipped exon alone. Given the expression of the AMOTL2 spliceoforms mimics the effects of SM04690 treatment, we sought to understand if overexpression of WT AMOTL2 might inhibit the ability of SM04690 to activate YAP. Indeed, overexpression of WT AMOTL2 was found to inhibit the upregulation of ANKRD1, CTGF, and CYR61 in response to 20 nM compound treatment (Figure 3G), indicating that inducing alternative splicing is essential to the mechanism of SM04690.
Alternative splicing of AMOTL2 promotes membrane delocalization
Consistent with previous research on the subcellular localization of AMOT family proteins (Zhao et al., 2011; Wells et al., 2006; Mana-Capelli et al., 2014), we found that AMOTL2 localizes to tight junctions at the plasma membrane of MDCK cells in conditions of high cell density (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A, B). Interestingly, we found that when MDCK cells were plated at high density and then treated with 1 µM SM04690 for 24 hr, AMOTL2 was much less efficiently localized to the plasma membrane as assessed by immunofluorescent staining followed by confocal microscopy (Figure 4A). Indeed, SM04690-treated samples displayed a greater than twofold loss of colocalization of AMOTL2 with adherens junction protein E-cadherin (Figure 4B). Instead, SM04690 treatment resulted in the noticeable formation of AMOLT2 positive puncta in the cytoplasm of cells. This effect on AMOTL2 puncta formation could be additionally recapitulated in HEK293A cells (Figure 4C, Figure 4—figure supplement 2A), as 1 µM SM04690 resulted in a 10-fold increase in puncta. Likewise, we found that overexpression of AMOTL2 ∆5, AMOTL2 ∆9, and AMOTL2 ∆5∆9 in HEK293A cells displayed dramatic increases in puncta number in comparison to WT AMOTL2 expression, with over 10-fold increases in puncta for AMOTL2 ∆5∆9 compared to WT AMOTL2 (Figure 4D, Figure 4—figure supplement 2B).
We next sought to understand if the change of AMOTL2 localization to the cytoplasm might be responsible for the mechanism of YAP activation by SM04690. AMOTL2 was originally discovered as an interactor of the membrane-associated protein Membrane Associated Guanylate Kinase, WW, and PDZ Domain Containing 1 (MAGI1), and it has also been shown to interact with tight junction-associated proteins such as Protein Associated with LIN7, MAGUK p55 Family Member (PALS1) (Patrie, 2005; Ernkvist et al., 2009). Through these interactions, AMOTL2 localizes YAP to tight junctions, where YAP is inactivated by phosphorylation. We hypothesized that AMOTL2 spliceoforms created after SM04690 treatment can likely no longer interact with these membrane-associated proteins, acting to sequester YAP away from inhibitory Hippo signaling. Indeed, co-immunofluorescent studies in MDCK cells plated at high density indicated that 1 µM SM04690 treatment for 24 hr decreases co-localization of AMOTL2 with PALS1 and MAGI1 by approximately twofold (Figure 4E and F, Figure 4—figure supplement 3A, B). While cloning of these large membrane-associated proteins proved difficult, we were able to clone the WW domain regions of MAGI1, which are responsible for its interaction with AMOTL2. From co-immunoprecipitation with the FLAG-tagged AMOTL2 spliceoforms in HEK293T cells, we found that AMOTL2 ∆9 and AMOTL2 ∆5∆9 lost their ability to interact with the WW domain regions of MAGI1 (Figure 4G). Collectively, these data suggest that alternative splicing of AMOTL2 culminates in gene products less capable of plasma membrane localization, which results in decreased YAP phosphorylation.
Discussion
In this study, we set out to identify repurposed drugs that might activate YAP, an effort we hypothesized would yield new druggable mechanisms for inactivating the Hippo pathway. From a high-throughput screen of the ReFRAME library, we have identified several kinase inhibitors that activate YAP. We specifically examined SM04690 as a novel YAP activator and have demonstrated a connection between CLK2 inhibition and YAP activity. Specifically, CLK2 inhibition induces exon skipping of exons 5 and 9 of AMOTL2, a protein integral to Hippo pathway activity. We propose a working model in which the alternative splicing of AMOTL2 impedes its ability to interact with proteins at the plasma membrane, such as PALS1 and MAGI-1 (Figure 5). The exon-skipped AMOTL2 gene product is, therefore, unable to shepherd YAP to tight junctions at the plasma membrane where it receives inhibitory phosphorylation. Consequently, unphosphorylated YAP is capable of translocating to the nucleus, where it interacts with TEADs to promote transcription of genes related to proliferation and survival. While we focused our efforts on understanding the role of SM04690, we identified several other kinase inhibitors as efficacious activators of YAP. Several of the reported targets of these identified inhibitors corresponded to related kinase families, including JAK kinases and AGC kinases. Future investigation into these and other protein kinase-based mechanisms will likely reveal several other druggable kinases that regulate Hippo pathway activity.
AMOTL2 serves a central role in regulating the Hippo pathway. Specifically, AMOTL2 has been shown to inhibit YAP, restraining it to the plasma membrane while concurrently stimulating the enzymatic activity of LATS1/2 (Paramasivam et al., 2011). These functions are possible due to AMOTL2’s activity as a scaffolding protein, bringing LATS1/2 in close proximity to MST1/2 at the plasma membrane (Mana-Capelli and McCollum, 2018). While most research indicates AMOTL2 plays a role in negatively regulating YAP activity, there remains some debate in the field as to whether AMOTL2, and more broadly the AMOT family of proteins, might also exert YAP stimulating activities in the cell (Lv et al., 2017). The work presented here adds to the mounting evidence that AMOTL2 acts as a negative regulator of YAP, most prominently displayed through an attenuation of transcription of YAP-controlled genes when wild-type AMOTL2 is overexpressed in the context of the YAP-activating compound SM04690 (Figure 3G). A lack of scaffolding functionality by AMOTL2 spliceoforms lacking exons 5 and/or 9 may also help to explain how this alternative splicing is able to activate YAP. It has been shown that the AMOTL2-related protein AMOT regulates Hippo pathway activity through the formation of biomolecular condensates, in contrast to traditional scaffolding proteins (Wang et al., 2022). AMOT-laden condensates have been shown to concentrate core Hippo pathway kinases, acting to potentially sequester YAP in the cytoplasm. Since there is considerable redundancy between AMOT and AMOTL2 (Mana-Capelli and McCollum, 2018; Li et al., 2012; Hirate and Sasaki, 2014; Leung and Zernicka-Goetz, 2013), it is conceivable that AMOTL2 may also regulate YAP through biomolecular condensates. The exon skipped AMOTL2 spliceoforms identified here could have impaired ability to phase separate into condensates or fail to incorporate core Hippo pathway kinases into these condensates. Future studies examining the capacity of AMOTL2 to phase separate and interact with Hippo pathway proteins could reveal exactly how the lack of tight junction localization of the AMOTL2:YAP complex leads to increased YAP activity. More generally, this study highlights the existing need to precisely define the specific roles for each AMOT family member (i.e. AMOT, AMOTL1, and AMOTL2), delineating which functions are redundant and which are unique to each family member.
Others have also shown that alternative splicing influences YAP activity. Indeed, several core Hippo pathway proteins have alternatively spliced isoforms. For example, tissue-specific alternative splicing of YAP itself can lead to eight different isoforms and has been shown to regulate its activity by altering the efficiency with which it interacts with LATS1/2 and TEADs, leading to cell-type specific effects on cellular proliferation (Gaffney et al., 2012; Iglesias-Bexiga et al., 2015; Vrbský et al., 2021). In addition, LATS1 and LATS2 exist as 7 and 2 spliceoforms in the cell, respectively, affecting their interactions with Hippo pathway scaffolding proteins Neurofibromin 2 (NF2) and MOB1 and modulating their catalytic activity (Porazinski and Ladomery, 2018; Kulaberoglu et al., 2017). While the exon skipping observed in this study is derived from pharmacological perturbation, it is possible that similar processes exist endogenously, particularly in cell types or physiological scenarios with lower CLK2 activity. For example, several breast cancer cell lines have been found to display highly variable levels of CLK2 expression (Yoshida et al., 2015). As YAP hyperactivity has been characterized as essential in several human tumor types, including breast cancer (Zanconato et al., 2016), it follows that cancer cell lines with lower CLK2 activity may display increased aggressiveness by activating YAP through the splicing-based mechanism presented here.
One final consideration raised in this study concerns the use of alternative splicing modulators in the treatment of disease. SM04690 was initially reported in the literature as an inhibitor of canonical Wnt signaling, displaying an EC50 of 19.5 nM in reporter-based assays (Deshmukh et al., 2018). Here, we have shown that SM04690 activates YAP with an EC50 of 1.2 nM in TEAD-LUC assays, suggesting that several transcriptional programs including YAP might be modulated by this compound at therapeutic doses. Indeed, while SM04690 has been used in a localized fashion to treat osteoarthritis of the knee (Yazici et al., 2020; Tambiah et al., 2021), our work suggests that the use of broad-acting modulators of alternative splicing should be met with caution, as inhibition of the CLK family of kinases induces alternative splicing in many transcripts (Araki et al., 2015), which may lead to undesired off-target effects. Nevertheless, this work has identified that CLK2 inhibitors are novel pharmacological tools to study the processes governing the regulation of the Hippo pathway and it further underscores the utility of performing unbiased screens for identifying important cellular biological mechanisms.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Request a detailed protocolReporter cells (293A-TEAD-LUC (HEK-293A-8xGTII-Luc)) were a gift from the laboratory of Xu Wu (Mass General). HEK293A cells were from Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA. MDCK and HEK293T cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). HaCaT immortalized human keratinocytes were from AddexBio. All cell lines were cultured in DMEM (Corning, Corning, NY) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco, Grand Island, NY) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco) and maintained at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
High-throughput screening
Request a detailed protocol20 nL of stock compounds solvated in DMSO were dispensed using an Echo Acoustic Liquid Handler instrument (Labcyte, San Jose, CA) before adding 750 293A-TEAD-LUC cells per well in white 1536-well plates (Corning). 24 hr later, 2 µL of ONE-glo luciferase detection reagent (Promega, Madison, WI) was dispensed per well and the luminance signal was recorded with an Envision plate reader (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA).
Miniaturized reporter assays
Request a detailed protocol2500 293A-TEAD-LUC cells were plated in 50 µL of growth medium without FBS in white 384-well plates (Corning) and allowed to proliferate for 48 hr until fully confluent. 100 nL of compound solvated in DMSO was then transferred to each well using a Bravo Automated Liquid Handling Platform (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) affixed with a pintool head (V&P Scientific, San Diego, CA). For TEAD-LUC activity assays, 30 µL of BrightGlo reagent solution (Promega, diluted 1:3 in water) was added to each well after 24 hr of compound treatment. For cytotoxicity assays, 30 µL of CellTiter-Glo reagent solution (Promega, diluted 1:6 in water) was added to each well after 24 hr and 72 hr of compound treatment. Luminance values were recorded on an Envision plate reader (Perkin Elmer).
shRNA knockdown studies
Request a detailed protocolCLK2-targeting shRNA vectors 1, 2, and 3 refer to Sigma Mission shRNA lentiviral clones TRCN0000197205, TRCN0000229970, TRCN0000355628, respectively. YAP-targeting shRNA vectors 1 and 2 refer to pLKO1-shYAP1 (Addgene, #27368) and pLKO1-shYAP2 (Addgene, #27369), respectively. The non-targeting scrambled control vector refers to SHC002 (Sigma, Burlington, MA). Lentiviruses were generated in HEK293T cells by transient expression of the vectors with pSPAX2 and pMD2.G packaging vectors (Addgene plasmids #12260 and #12259). Viral supernatants were collected after 48 hr of expression and passed through a 45 µm syringe filter before exposure to target cells.
Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR)
Request a detailed protocolAfter 48 hr of transgene expression or 24 hr of compound treatment, cells were collected by trypsinization and subsequent centrifugation at 1200 × g. RNA was isolated using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) and RNA concentrations were determined using a NanoDrop instrument. 1 µg of RNA was subjected to reverse transcription reaction with High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher). Quantitative RT-PCR reactions were measured on a Viia 7 Real-Time PCR system (Thermo Fisher) using Power SYBR Green (Thermo Fisher) and transcript-specific primers below. Reactions were normalized to GAPDH levels for each biological replicate and relative transcript abundance was calculated with the comparative Ct method.
Gene Name | Forward Primer | Reverse Primer |
---|---|---|
ANKRD1 | GTGTAGCACCAGATCCATCG | CGGTGAGACTGAACCGCTAT |
CTGF | TGGAGATTTTGGGAGTACGG | CAGGCTAGAGAAGCAGAGCC |
CYR61 | CCCGTTTTGGTAGATTCTGG | GCTGGAATGCAACTTCGG |
GAPDH | AATGAAGGGGTCATTGATGG | AAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTCAA |
AMOTL2 exon 7 | GGAATGTCGGATGAGAGTGG | GAAATCCAGCGGCTCTCTGAG |
AMOTL2 exon 5 skipped | CTGTTCGTAGCTCTAAGATCCC | GAAATCCAGCGGCTCTCTGAG |
AMOTL2 exon 5 included | GTAGGGAGAAAGAGGCTTG | GGTTTCTTCTTCCATGAAACAGGG |
AMOTL2 exon 9 skipped | GCTACAGAGCTGTAGTCAG | GTCGGTGCCATCTGTTTTCG |
AMOTL2 exon 9 included | CTGGAGACAGACAAGAACACAG | CAGAGCATTGTGCTTGGTTG |
Semi-quantitative PCR
Request a detailed protocolAfter 24 hr of compound treatment, cells were collected by trypsinization and subsequent centrifugation at 1200 × g. RNA was isolated using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen) and RNA concentrations were determined using a NanoDrop instrument. 1 µg of RNA was subjected to reverse transcription reaction with High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher). 1 µL of cDNA was subjected to PCR with exon-specific primers using Platinum Taq DNA Polymerase (Thermo Fisher). PCR reactions underwent 35 cycles of replication. PCR reactions were visualized via horizontal gel electrophoresis using a 2% agarose gel. Gels were imaged using a ChemiDoc (BioRad, Hercules, CA).
Gene Name | Forward Primer | Reverse Primer |
---|---|---|
AMOTL2 exon 5 | CTCCTGCTGCTGTTCGTAG | CTTCAACCGGGATCTTAGAG |
AMOTL2 exon 9 | CTCTGGATGTAGCTACAGAG | CTGCTCGGCTGACTACAG |
Plasmids
FLAG-tagged wild-type AMOTL2 (NM_016201) was obtained from OriGene, Rockville, MD. Codon-optimized sequences encoding truncated, FLAG-tagged transgenes of AMOTL2 and HA-tagged MAGI-1 WW domains were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA) as gBlock HiFi Gene Fragments and cloned into the pCMV6 backbone via Gibson assembly using a HiFi DNA Assembly Cloning Kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA).
Immunoblotting
Request a detailed protocolHEK293A cells were plated in a standard growth medium at 500,000 cells per well in six-well plates and allowed to grow for 48 hr. Then, cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of SM04690 for 24 hr. Cells were washed with PBS and collected by the addition of 250 µL of RIPA buffer (EMD Millipore, Burlington, MA) with scraping. Lysates were clarified by centrifugation (18,253 × g, 5 min, 4 °C) and protein concentrations were determined by absorbance on a NanoDrop instrument (Thermo Fisher). Equal amounts of lysate were mixed with 4 x loading dye (2% SDS, 200 mM Tris, 20% glycerol, and 0.01% bromophenol blue) with ß-mercaptoethanol added to a final concentration of 10%. Protein material was resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) in 12-well gels (Invitrogen (Waltham, MA), 4–12% Bis-tris BOLT gels) in 0.9 x MOPS-SDS buffer (Invitrogen). Samples were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Thermo Fisher) using a semi-dry transfer apparatus (BioRad). Membranes were blocked for 1 hr at room temperature with 5% non-fat dry milk (BioRad) in Tris-buffered saline (TBS, Corning) containing 0.1% Tween-20. Primary antibodies were incubated with shaking overnight at 4 °C in 5% milk in TBST or 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in TBST. Membranes were exposed to either fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies (Li-Cor (Lincoln, NE); 1:2000) or HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Sigma; 1:3000) in TBST with 5% milk for 30 min (Li-Cor) or 1 hr (HRP) at room temperature. Signals were recorded with either a Li-Cor fluorescence imager or exposed to HRP substrate (West Dura Substrate, Pierce (Waltham, MA)) and signals recorded using autoradiography film (Genesee Scientific, El Cajon, CA) or by imaging using a ChemiDoc instrument (BioRad).
Antigen | Supplier | Catalog # | Dilution |
---|---|---|---|
Phospho-YAP (S127) | Cell Signaling Technologies | 13008 S | 1:1000 (BSA) |
YAP (total) | Cell Signaling Technologies | 140074 S | 1:1000 (BSA) |
AMOTL2 | Sigma | HPA063027 | 1:1000 (Milk) |
HA | Cell Signaling Technologies | 3724 S | 1:1000 (BSA) |
FLAG | Sigma | F1804 | 1:1000 (Milk) |
Tubulin | Sigma | T6557 | 1:2000 (Milk) |
Immunoprecipitation studies
Request a detailed protocolPlasmids were transiently transfected to HEK293T cells for transgene expression using FuGENE (4 µL FuGENE per 1 µg of DNA) in 100 µL of Opti-MEM (Gibco) per well of a six-well plate (2 µg DNA total per well). Media was replaced 24 hr later. Following an additional 24 hr incubation, cells were washed with PBS and collected by the addition of 250 µL of RIPA buffer (EMD Millipore) or non-denaturing lysis buffer (20 mM Tris, 137 mM NaCl, and 0.5% NP-40) with scraping. For MAGI1 immunoprecipitation, lysates were tip sonicated. Insoluble material was separated by centrifugation (18,253 × g, 5 min, 4 °C) and the protein concentration in cellular lysates was determined by absorbance on a nanodrop instrument (Thermo Fisher). 1 mg of lysate in 1 mL of lysis buffer was incubated overnight at 4 °C with 20 µL of anti-FLAG M2 magnetic bead slurry (MilliporeSigma, no. M8823). After three washes with lysis buffer, immunoprecipitated material was eluted with 250 µg per mL of FLAG peptide (DYKDDDDK, Sino Biological (Beijing, China)). Eluted material from immunoprecipitations and whole-cell lysates were evaluated by immunoblotting analyses as described above.
Imaging studies
Request a detailed protocolFor AMOTL2 localization studies, MDCK cells were plated in 12-well plates with glass coverslips at either 10,000 (sparse) or 400,000 (dense) cells in a growth medium and allowed to propagate for 48 hr. For treatment studies, 350,000 cells in growth medium propagated for 48 hr cells were treated for 24 hr with 1 µM SM04690. Growth medium was removed, and cells were fixed with ice-cold methanol for 10 min at –20 °C. After washing five times with PBS, cells were blocked and permeabilized with 5% FBS and 0.1% Triton-X in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. Primary antibodies in the same blocking buffer were incubated at 1:100 overnight at 4 °C. After three washes with PBS, Secondary AlexaFluor-conjugated antibodies (Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA); 1:500 in 5% FBS, 0.1% Triton-X in PBS) with Hoechst 33342 dye were incubated for 1 hr at room temperature in the dark. The wells were washed three more times with PBS and then coverslips were removed and mounted onto glass slides using the ProLong Gold Antifade Mount (Thermo Fisher). Slides were imaged using a laser-scanning Zeiss (Oberkochen, Germany) confocal LSM 720 microscope and colocalization coefficients were calculated using Zeiss Zen software. For AMOTL2 overexpression localization studies, HEK293A cells plated in six-well plates with glass coverslips were transfected with 1 µg of AMOTL2 constructs and grown for 48 hr. Fixing, staining, and imaging proceeded with the same steps as above. Puncta were quantified using Image J (NIH, Bethesda, MD). For YAP localization studies, MDCK cells were plated in 12-well plates with glass coverslips at 250,000 cells per well and allowed to propagate for 48 hr. Cells were then treated for 24 hr with 1 µM SM04690. Growth medium was removed, and cells were fixed with ice-cold methanol for 10 min at –20 °C. After washing three times with PBS, cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 15 min at room temperature. Primary antibodies in 5% BSA in PBS were incubated at 1:100 overnight at 4 °C. After three washes with PBS, Secondary AlexaFluor-conjugated antibodies (Life Technologies; 1:500 in 5% BSA in PBS) with Hoechst 33342 dye were incubated for 1 hr at room temperature in the dark. The wells were washed three more times with PBS and then coverslips were removed and mounted onto glass slides using the ProLong Gold Antifade Mount (Thermo Fisher). Slides were imaged using a laser-scanning Zeiss confocal microscope as above.
Antigen | Supplier | Catalog # | Dilution |
---|---|---|---|
YAP (total) | Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX | SC-101199 | 1:100 |
AMOTL2 | Sigma | HPA063027 | 1:100 |
E-cadherin | Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA | 14472 | 1:100 |
PALS1 | Santa Cruz Biotechnology | SC-365411 | 1:100 |
MAGI-1 | Abnova, Taipei City, Taiwan | H00009223-M02 | 1:100 |
Human keratinocyte proliferation assays
Request a detailed protocolImmortalized human keratinocytes (HaCaT cells) were plated at 5 × 103 cells per well in 12-well plates in a reduced-serum-containing medium (DMEM containing 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 0 or 2% FBS). After 24 hr, cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of SM04690. After 7 days of growth under these conditions, cells were fixed in 4% PFA in PBS for 10 min, exposed to 2 µg per mL Hoechst 33342 for 10 min and imaged on a Nikon Eclipse Ti microscope. Nuclei were quantified by an automated ImageJ macro and reported as nuclei per imaging field.
Chemicals
SM04690 was obtained from Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX. T025 and CLK-in-T3 were from MedChemExpress, Monmouth Junction, NJ. CC671, Harmine, INDY, Leucettine L41, ML167, and TG003 were from Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI. All chemicals were dissolved in DMSO with no further purification.
Statistics
All statistical analyses were univariate two-sided t-tests. All experiments were performed at least twice.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and source data files.
References
-
The novel kinase inhibitor PRT062070 (Cerdulatinib) demonstrates efficacy in models of autoimmunity and B-cell cancerThe Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 351:538–548.https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.114.218164
-
Splicing regulators and their roles in cancer biology and therapyBioMed Research International 2015:150514.https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/150514
-
SR proteins: binders, regulators, and connectors of RNAMolecules and Cells 40:1–9.https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2017.2319
-
YAP and TAZ regulate skin wound healingThe Journal of Investigative Dermatology 134:518–525.https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2013.339
-
The Amotl2 gene inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signaling and regulates embryonic development in zebrafishThe Journal of Biological Chemistry 287:13005–13015.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.347419
-
The SR protein family of splicing factors: master regulators of gene expressionThe Biochemical Journal 417:15–27.https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20081501
-
Angiomotin Family members: oncogenes or tumor suppressors?International Journal of Biological Sciences 13:772–781.https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.19603
-
Angiomotins link F-actin architecture to Hippo pathway signalingMolecular Biology of the Cell 25:1676–1685.https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E13-11-0701
-
Angiomotins stimulate LATS kinase autophosphorylation and act as scaffolds that promote Hippo signalingThe Journal of Biological Chemistry 293:18230–18241.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA118.004187
-
Identification and characterization of metabolites of ASP015K, a novel oral Janus kinase inhibitor, in rats, chimeric mice with humanized liver, and humansXenobiotica; the Fate of Foreign Compounds in Biological Systems 45:757–765.https://doi.org/10.3109/00498254.2015.1019594
-
Angiomotin family proteins are novel activators of the LATS2 kinase tumor suppressorMolecular Biology of the Cell 22:3725–3733.https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-04-0300
-
CLK2 blockade modulates alternative splicing compromising MYC-driven breast tumorsEMBO Molecular Medicine 10:e9213.https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201809213
-
YAP-dependent proliferation by a small molecule targeting annexin A2Nature Chemical Biology 17:767–775.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-021-00755-0
-
Hippo promotes proliferation arrest and apoptosis in the Salvador/Warts pathwayNature Cell Biology 5:914–920.https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1050
-
Angiomotin-like proteins associate with and negatively regulate YAP1The Journal of Biological Chemistry 286:4364–4370.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C110.205401
-
AT13148 is a novel, oral multi-AGC kinase inhibitor with potent pharmacodynamic and antitumor activityClinical Cancer Research 18:3912–3923.https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3313
-
CLK2 is an oncogenic kinase and splicing regulator in breast cancerCancer Research 75:1516–1526.https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2443
-
The Hippo pathway: regulators and regulationsGenes & Development 27:355–371.https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.210773.112
-
Angiomotin is a novel Hippo pathway component that inhibits YAP oncoproteinGenes & Development 25:51–63.https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.2000111
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (EDUC4-12811)
- Maya L Bulos
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM146865)
- Michael J Bollong
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the NIH (GM146865 to MJB). MLB was supported by a CIRM training fellowship (EDUC4-12811).
Version history
- Preprint posted:
- Sent for peer review:
- Reviewed Preprint version 1:
- Reviewed Preprint version 2:
- Version of Record published:
Cite all versions
You can cite all versions using the DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88508. This DOI represents all versions, and will always resolve to the latest one.
Copyright
© 2023, Bulos et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 974
- views
-
- 121
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
Identifying target proteins for bioactive molecules is essential for understanding their mechanisms, developing improved derivatives, and minimizing off-target effects. Despite advances in target identification (target-ID) technologies, significant challenges remain, impeding drug development. Most target-ID methods use cell lysates, but maintaining an intact cellular context is vital for capturing specific drug–protein interactions, such as those with transient protein complexes and membrane-associated proteins. To address these limitations, we developed POST-IT (Pup-On-target for Small molecule Target Identification Technology), a non-diffusive proximity tagging system for live cells, orthogonal to the eukaryotic system. POST-IT utilizes an engineered fusion of proteasomal accessory factor A and HaloTag to transfer Pup to proximal proteins upon directly binding to the small molecule. After significant optimization to eliminate self-pupylation and polypupylation, minimize depupylation, and optimize chemical linkers, POST-IT successfully identified known targets and discovered a new binder, SEPHS2, for dasatinib, and VPS37C as a new target for hydroxychloroquine, enhancing our understanding these drugs’ mechanisms of action. Furthermore, we demonstrated the application of POST-IT in live zebrafish embryos, highlighting its potential for broad biological research and drug development.
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
The Parkinson’s disease (PD)-linked protein Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2 (LRRK2) consists of seven domains, including a kinase and a Roc G domain. Despite the availability of several high-resolution structures, the dynamic regulation of its unique intramolecular domain stack is nevertheless still not well understood. By in-depth biochemical analysis, assessing the Michaelis–Menten kinetics of the Roc G domain, we have confirmed that LRRK2 has, similar to other Roco protein family members, a KM value of LRRK2 that lies within the range of the physiological GTP concentrations within the cell. Furthermore, the R1441G PD variant located within a mutational hotspot in the Roc domain showed an increased catalytic efficiency. In contrast, the most common PD variant G2019S, located in the kinase domain, showed an increased KM and reduced catalytic efficiency, suggesting a negative feedback mechanism from the kinase domain to the G domain. Autophosphorylation of the G1+2 residue (T1343) in the Roc P-loop motif is critical for this phosphoregulation of both the KM and the kcat values of the Roc-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis, most likely by changing the monomer–dimer equilibrium. The LRRK2 T1343A variant has a similar increased kinase activity in cells compared to G2019S and the double mutant T1343A/G2019S has no further increased activity, suggesting that T1343 is crucial for the negative feedback in the LRRK2 signaling cascade. Together, our data reveal a novel intramolecular feedback regulation of the LRRK2 Roc G domain by a LRRK2 kinase-dependent mechanism. Interestingly, PD mutants differently change the kinetics of the GTPase cycle, which might in part explain the difference in penetrance of these mutations in PD patients.