Microbiome: Finding common connections

Ecological associations among gut bacteria are largely consistent across hosts in a population of wild baboons.
  1. Ma Francesca M Santiago
  2. Aura Raulo  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Biology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  2. Department of Computing, University of Turku, Finland

Living inside the gut of most mammals, including humans, is a unique cocktail of bacteria and other microbes collectively known as the gut microbiome. How individuals end up hosting such varied populations depends not only on the microbes they acquire from their environment, but also on how these organisms ecologically interact with one another inside the gut. For example, some microbes may be excluded from a host by a competitor (negative association; Mäklin et al., 2022), while others may be promoted to grow due to the mutual benefits provided by another microbe (positive association; Seth and Taga, 2014). Which bacteria end up in the microbiome has consequences for the health of the host (Suzuki, 2017). Therefore, understanding how bacteria in the gut interact, and whether these interactions are consistent across individuals, could help researchers develop better therapeutic drugs for recovering and maintaining a healthy gut microbiome.

Negative and positive interactions are typically measured by growing closely related groups of bacteria, known as taxa, in the presence or absence of other taxa (Foster and Bell, 2012; Gould et al., 2018). However, these kinds of experiments are practically impossible to carry out for communities as diverse as the gut microbiome. To overcome this, scientists study individual microbiomes to determine which bacterial taxa frequently occur together (suggesting they promote each other’s growth), and which rarely inhabit the same host (suggesting they are likely to be competitors). However, this approach does not reveal if interactions are consistent across different hosts (i.e. universal), or are unique to bacterial communities inside each individual.

Now, in eLife, Elizabeth Archie from the University of Notre Dame and colleagues – including Kimberley Roche as first author – report how different bacterial taxa fluctuate over time in the gut of wild baboons to determine if the interactions between them are universal (Roche et al., 2023). The team (who are based at various institutes in the United States and Germany) used data from a long-term study of wild baboons living in Amboseli, Kenya which had their microbiomes sampled hundreds of times between 2000 and 2013. Using a statistical model they had developed, Roche et al. tracked how the quantity of individual taxa rose and declined over time. These traces were then compared to determine which bacterial taxa fluctuated together (positive association) and which rose and fell in opposing directions (negative association).

Next, Roche et al. examined if the associations among bacteria were comparable across individuals. The strength and direction of the correlations (i.e. whether they were positive or negative) were remarkably consistent across the 56 baboons studied, suggesting that ecological interactions in the gut microbiome are mostly universal (Figure 1). Most of these associations were relatively weak and negative, suggesting that gut bacteria usually do not help one another grow, but rather compete with each other or thrive in different states, such as hosts with specific variations in their immune or endocrine systems. This result aligns well with ecological theory which predicts that strong, positive dependencies within a community should be rare, as highly interdependent ecosystems are likely to be unstable (Coyte et al., 2015) – a phenomenon Roche et al. refer to as an ‘ecological house of cards’.

Are interactions between gut bacteria universal or individual to each host?.

The community of microbes living in the gut of mammals, such as baboons, varies between individuals. This variation depends on how bacteria from different taxa (represented by coloured circles) interact with one another: some taxa may support each other’s growth (positive association; blue line), while others may compete to prevent one another from inhabiting the same host (negative association; orange line). The strength of these connections can also vary (represented by the width of the line). Roche et al. used data from the gut microbiomes of baboons to investigate if these associations are universal, meaning taxa interact the same way across multiple hosts (top panel), or individualised, meaning taxa have different relationships with one another in different hosts (bottom panel).

It is unclear how many of these universal associations arise from direct ecological interactions between microbes, and how many arise from bacterial taxa simply preferring similar or different host environments. Roche et al. make a compelling case that both of these processes might be at play. They show that environmental similarity (e.g. diet) between hosts does not influence universality scores, supporting the idea that these associations reflect true ecological interactions. Furthermore, they show that associations with the highest universality score were positive relationships between closely related bacteria, suggesting that these interactions may be partly due to bacteria responding to a host’s internal state or environment in a similar way.

These findings suggest that while the composition of microbes in the gut can be highly individualised, the underlying ecology shaping this variation may be similar. This is good news for scientists developing therapies to modify the gut microbiome, such as probiotics, since it means that different microbiomes are likely to react predictably to interventions. Moreover, the ability to infer ecological phenomena from microbiome data has tremendous value for ecology as a whole.

The last century has seen a vast number of mathematical models for describing ecological theories, such as the theory of ecological succession (Cowles, 1899). However, testing these models in large-scale ecosystems is challenging as it usually requires data that has been collected over long periods of time, such as seeing a forest grow from its initial state to a stable climax. The findings of Roche et al. suggest that many hypotheses of ecological theory could instead be tested with data from microbiomes – which vary greatly across space, change quickly, but follow the same ecological principles as the large-scale ecological world we perceive. This new approach could bring scientists one step closer to answering many unexplored questions in ecology which, ultimately, govern our ability to survive on this planet.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ma Francesca M Santiago

    Ma Francesca M Santiago is in the Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6819-074X
  2. Aura Raulo

    Aura Raulo is in the Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, and the Department of Computing, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

    For correspondence
    aura.raulo@biology.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4860-7840

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: June 26, 2023 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2023, Santiago and Raulo

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 400
    views
  • 18
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ma Francesca M Santiago
  2. Aura Raulo
(2023)
Microbiome: Finding common connections
eLife 12:e89468.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.89468
  1. Further reading

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    Keisuke Atsumi, Yuusuke Nishida ... Shogoro Fujiki
    Research Article

    Comprehensive biodiversity data is crucial for ecosystem protection. The Biome mobile app, launched in Japan, efficiently gathers species observations from the public using species identification algorithms and gamification elements. The app has amassed >6 million observations since 2019. Nonetheless, community-sourced data may exhibit spatial and taxonomic biases. Species distribution models (SDMs) estimate species distribution while accommodating such bias. Here, we investigated the quality of Biome data and its impact on SDM performance. Species identification accuracy exceeds 95% for birds, reptiles, mammals, and amphibians, but seed plants, molluscs, and fishes scored below 90%. Our SDMs for 132 terrestrial plants and animals across Japan revealed that incorporating Biome data into traditional survey data improved accuracy. For endangered species, traditional survey data required >2000 records for accurate models (Boyce index ≥ 0.9), while blending the two data sources reduced this to around 300. The uniform coverage of urban-natural gradients by Biome data, compared to traditional data biased towards natural areas, may explain this improvement. Combining multiple data sources better estimates species distributions, aiding in protected area designation and ecosystem service assessment. Establishing a platform for accumulating community-sourced distribution data will contribute to conserving and monitoring natural ecosystems.

    1. Ecology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Chunxiao Li, Tao Deng ... Shiqi Wang
    Research Article

    The long-trunked elephantids underwent a significant evolutionary stage characterized by an exceptionally elongated mandible. The initial elongation and subsequent regression of the long mandible, along with its co-evolution with the trunk, present an intriguing issue that remains incompletely understood. Through comparative functional and eco-morphological investigations, as well as feeding preference analysis, we reconstructed the feeding behavior of major groups of longirostrine elephantiforms. In the Platybelodon clade, the rapid evolutionary changes observed in the narial region, strongly correlated with mandible and tusk characteristics, suggest a crucial evolutionary transition where feeding function shifted from the mandible to the trunk, allowing proboscideans to expand their niches to more open regions. This functional shift further resulted in elephantids relying solely on their trunks for feeding. Our research provides insights into how unique environmental pressures shape the extreme evolution of organs, particularly in large mammals that developed various peculiar adaptations during the late Cenozoic global cooling trends.