The deca-GX3 proteins Yae1-Lto1 function as adaptors recruiting the ABC protein Rli1 for iron-sulfur cluster insertion

  1. Viktoria Désirée Paul
  2. Ulrich Mühlenhoff
  3. Martin Stümpfig
  4. Jan Seebacher
  5. Karl G Kugler
  6. Christian Renicke
  7. Christof Taxis
  8. Anne-Claude Gavin
  9. Antonio J Pierik
  10. Roland Lill  Is a corresponding author
  1. Philipps-Universität, Germany
  2. Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Switzerland
  3. European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Germany
  4. Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany

Abstract

Cytosolic and nuclear iron-sulfur (Fe-S) proteins are involved in many essential pathways including translation and DNA maintenance. Their maturation requires the CIA (cytosolic Fe S protein assembly) machinery. To identify new CIA proteins we employed systematic protein interaction approaches and discovered the essential proteins Yae1 and Lto1 as binding partners of the CIA targeting complex. Depletion of Yae1 or Lto1 results in defective Fe-S maturation of the ribosome-associated ABC protein Rli1, but surprisingly no other tested targets. Yae1 and Lto1 facilitate Fe-S cluster assembly on Rli1 in a chain of binding events. Lto1 uses its conserved C-terminal tryptophan for binding the CIA targeting complex, the deca-GX3 motifs in both Yae1 and Lto1 facilitate their complex formation, and Yae1 recruits Rli1. Human YAE1D1 and the cancer-related ORAOV1 can replace their yeast counterparts demonstrating evolutionary conservation. Collectively, the Yae1-Lto1 complex functions as a target-specific adaptor that recruits apo-Rli1 to the generic CIA machinery.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Viktoria Désirée Paul

    Institut für Zytobiologie und Zytopathologie, Philipps-Universität, Marburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ulrich Mühlenhoff

    Institut für Zytobiologie und Zytopathologie, Philipps-Universität, Marburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Martin Stümpfig

    Institut für Zytobiologie und Zytopathologie, Philipps-Universität, Marburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jan Seebacher

    Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Karl G Kugler

    Structural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Christian Renicke

    Fachbereich Biologie/Genetik, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Christof Taxis

    Fachbereich Biologie/Genetik, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Anne-Claude Gavin

    Structural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Antonio J Pierik

    Institut für Zytobiologie und Zytopathologie, Philipps-Universität, Marburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Roland Lill

    Institut für Zytobiologie und Zytopathologie, Philipps-Universität, Marburg, Germany
    For correspondence
    lill@staff.uni-marburg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2015, Désirée Paul et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,821
    views
  • 463
    downloads
  • 57
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Viktoria Désirée Paul
  2. Ulrich Mühlenhoff
  3. Martin Stümpfig
  4. Jan Seebacher
  5. Karl G Kugler
  6. Christian Renicke
  7. Christof Taxis
  8. Anne-Claude Gavin
  9. Antonio J Pierik
  10. Roland Lill
(2015)
The deca-GX3 proteins Yae1-Lto1 function as adaptors recruiting the ABC protein Rli1 for iron-sulfur cluster insertion
eLife 4:e08231.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08231

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08231

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Kira Breunig, Xuifen Lei ... Luiz O Penalva
    Research Article

    RNA binding proteins (RBPs) containing intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are present in diverse molecular complexes where they function as dynamic regulators. Their characteristics promote liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) and the formation of membraneless organelles such as stress granules and nucleoli. IDR-RBPs are particularly relevant in the nervous system and their dysfunction is associated with neurodegenerative diseases and brain tumor development. Serpine1 mRNA-binding protein 1 (SERBP1) is a unique member of this group, being mostly disordered and lacking canonical RNA-binding domains. We defined SERBP1’s interactome, uncovered novel roles in splicing, cell division and ribosomal biogenesis, and showed its participation in pathological stress granules and Tau aggregates in Alzheimer’s brains. SERBP1 preferentially interacts with other G-quadruplex (G4) binders, implicated in different stages of gene expression, suggesting that G4 binding is a critical component of SERBP1 function in different settings. Similarly, we identified important associations between SERBP1 and PARP1/polyADP-ribosylation (PARylation). SERBP1 interacts with PARP1 and its associated factors and influences PARylation. Moreover, protein complexes in which SERBP1 participates contain mostly PARylated proteins and PAR binders. Based on these results, we propose a feedback regulatory model in which SERBP1 influences PARP1 function and PARylation, while PARylation modulates SERBP1 functions and participation in regulatory complexes.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Parnian Arafi, Sujan Devkota ... Michael S Wolfe
    Research Article

    Missense mutations in the amyloid precursor protein (APP) and presenilin-1 (PSEN1) cause early-onset familial Alzheimer’s disease (FAD) and alter proteolytic production of secreted 38-to-43-residue amyloid β-peptides (Aβ) by the PSEN1-containing γ-secretase complex, ostensibly supporting the amyloid hypothesis of pathogenesis. However, proteolysis of APP substrate by γ-secretase is processive, involving initial endoproteolysis to produce long Aβ peptides of 48 or 49 residues followed by carboxypeptidase trimming in mostly tripeptide increments. We recently reported evidence that FAD mutations in APP and PSEN1 cause deficiencies in early steps in processive proteolysis of APP substrate C99 and that this results from stalled γ-secretase enzyme-substrate and/or enzyme-intermediate complexes. These stalled complexes triggered synaptic degeneration in a Caenorhabditis elegans model of FAD independently of Aβ production. Here, we conducted full quantitative analysis of all proteolytic events on APP substrate by γ-secretase with six additional PSEN1 FAD mutations and found that all six are deficient in multiple processing steps. However, only one of these (F386S) was deficient in certain trimming steps but not in endoproteolysis. Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy in intact cells revealed that all six PSEN1 FAD mutations lead to stalled γ-secretase enzyme-substrate/intermediate complexes. The F386S mutation, however, does so only in Aβ-rich regions of the cells, not in C99-rich regions, consistent with the deficiencies of this mutant enzyme only in trimming of Aβ intermediates. These findings provide further evidence that FAD mutations lead to stalled and stabilized γ-secretase enzyme-substrate and/or enzyme-intermediate complexes and are consistent with the stalled process rather than the products of γ-secretase proteolysis as the pathogenic trigger.