Intraflagellar transport: Trainspotting in a cilium
Cilia are antenna-like structures that protrude from many cells and perform a variety of roles: some help cells to move while others are involved in signaling. Faulty or disrupted cilia can lead to diseases known as ciliopathies that can affect multiple organs and cause symptoms ranging from blindness, kidney cysts and neurological problems to infertility and skeletal malformations (Reiter and Leroux, 2017).
Cilia are complex structures that contain over 600 proteins, all of which have to be transported to the cilium when it is being assembled. Moreover, all the proteins and receptors involved in signaling have to be shuttled into and out of the cilia as needed: this is done by an elaborate piece of molecular machinery called the intraflagellar transport system, or IFT for short (Lechtreck, 2015).
This system was first discovered in the single-celled green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, whose cilia share many similarities with those found in mammals (Kozminski et al., 1993). In Chlamydomonas the components of the IFT system form complexes known as IFT trains, which carry cargo proteins along dedicated microtubule tracks (that run along the length of cilia) in different directions (Figure 1). Kinesin motor proteins move the IFT trains from the base of the cilia to the tip, while dynein motors move the IFT trains back to the base (Lechtreck, 2015).
The tip of a cilium is a busy place and once the IFT trains have reached the tip and unloaded their cargo, they undergo major remodeling before returning to the base with their new cargo. However, until now existing microscopy techniques have not been able to reveal what happens during this remodeling. Now, in eLife, Ahmet Yildiz at the University of California Berkeley and colleagues – including Alexander Chien and Sheng Min Shih as joint first authors – report new insights into the behavior of IFT trains and motor proteins (Chien et al., 2017).
Chien et al. used a method called PhotoGate microscopy to image the tips of cilia in Chlamydomonas and to track individual IFT trains (Belyy et al., 2017). With this technique, most of the IFT complexes labeled with a fluorescent marker were ‘photobleached’ by moving a laser from the tip of the cilium to the base, leaving only a few selected complexes fluorescent. This way, the entire journey of individual trains to the tip of the cilium and back to the base could be tracked. Chien et al. found that the IFT trains stop at the ciliary tip for about three seconds, during which they undergo extensive remodeling. The trains split apart and mix with other ones to form new trains – a process that takes just over a second – and then wait for two seconds before departing. For every fluorescent train arriving at the tip, about 2.4 new fluorescent ones return to the base.
Next, Chien et al. tracked the movement of kinesin-II and dynein-1b and found that although these two motor proteins arrive together at the tip of the cilium, they depart independently of each other. While dynein-1b participates in the formation of new trains, kinesin-II rests at the tip for about two seconds and is not part of the new trains. Rather, kinesin-II seems to rely on passive diffusion rather than active transport to return to the base of the cilium, which means that it takes 10 times longer to return than dynein-1b.
In most eukaryotic cells, the length of cilia is tightly regulated, and if they are amputated, cilia grow back to the same length as before (Ishikawa and Marshall, 2017). But how do cells know how long a given cilium is? The results of Chien et al. suggest that the availability of kinesin-II at the base provides this information: when a cilium is short, it takes a relatively short time for kinesin-II to diffuse back to the base; however, as the length of the cilium increases, it takes longer for kinesin-II to diffuse back, and its availability to power new IFT trains is reduced, as is the growth rate of the cilium.
This study is one step toward a better understanding of the workings of IFT trains and how cilia regulate their length. However, in some species, such as worms and mammals, kinesins rely on the IFT trains rather than diffusion to return to the base, so it remains unclear how cilia length is maintained in these organisms (Mijalkovic et al., 2017; Prevo et al., 2015; Williams et al., 2014). Previous research suggests that several kinases affect the length of cilia, but it is not yet known if these kinases control kinesin motor levels at the base of cilia, or work in a different manner to maintain cilia length (Ishikawa and Marshall, 2017). Mutations affecting dynein have been found in several severe ciliopathies and could also affect the cilium length, which highlights how important length control is for cilia to work properly (McInerney-Leo et al., 2013).
References
-
PhotoGate microscopy to track single molecules in crowded environmentsNature Communications 8:13978.https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13978
-
Intraflagellar transport and ciliary dynamicsCold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 9:a021998.https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a021998
-
IFT-cargo interactions and protein transport in ciliaTrends in Biochemical Sciences 40:765–778.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2015.09.003
-
Short-rib polydactyly and Jeune syndromes are caused by mutations in WDR60The American Journal of Human Genetics 93:515–523.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.06.022
-
Genes and molecular pathways underpinning ciliopathiesNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 18:533–547.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2017.60
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2017, Kumar et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,589
- views
-
- 201
- downloads
-
- 3
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Computational and Systems Biology
- Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
Viral adhesion to host cells is a critical step in infection for many viruses, including monkeypox virus (MPXV). In MPXV, the H3 protein mediates viral adhesion through its interaction with heparan sulfate (HS), yet the structural details of this interaction have remained elusive. Using AI-based structural prediction tools and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we identified a novel, positively charged α-helical domain in H3 that is essential for HS binding. This conserved domain, found across orthopoxviruses, was experimentally validated and shown to be critical for viral adhesion, making it an ideal target for antiviral drug development. Targeting this domain, we designed a protein inhibitor, which disrupted the H3-HS interaction, inhibited viral infection in vitro and viral replication in vivo, offering a promising antiviral candidate. Our findings reveal a novel therapeutic target of MPXV, demonstrating the potential of combination of AI-driven methods and MD simulations to accelerate antiviral drug discovery.
-
- Chromosomes and Gene Expression
- Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
Type II nuclear receptors (T2NRs) require heterodimerization with a common partner, the retinoid X receptor (RXR), to bind cognate DNA recognition sites in chromatin. Based on previous biochemical and overexpression studies, binding of T2NRs to chromatin is proposed to be regulated by competition for a limiting pool of the core RXR subunit. However, this mechanism has not yet been tested for endogenous proteins in live cells. Using single-molecule tracking (SMT) and proximity-assisted photoactivation (PAPA), we monitored interactions between endogenously tagged RXR and retinoic acid receptor (RAR) in live cells. Unexpectedly, we find that higher expression of RAR, but not RXR, increases heterodimerization and chromatin binding in U2OS cells. This surprising finding indicates the limiting factor is not RXR but likely its cadre of obligate dimer binding partners. SMT and PAPA thus provide a direct way to probe which components are functionally limiting within a complex TF interaction network providing new insights into mechanisms of gene regulation in vivo with implications for drug development targeting nuclear receptors.