Pupillometry: Consciousness reflected in the eyes

People with higher autistic traits display stronger fluctuations in pupil size when presented with an optical illusion.
  • Download
  • Cite
  • CommentOpen annotations (there are currently 0 annotations on this page).
  1. Woon Ju Park  Is a corresponding author
  2. Kimberly B Schauder  Is a corresponding author
  3. Duje Tadin  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Rochester, United States
  2. University of Rochester School of Medicine, United States

Most of the tasks that our brain orchestrates in our body are performed outside of our conscious awareness. In addition to breathing, maintaining our balance and keeping our heart beating, these tasks include increasing or decreasing the size of our pupils as our environment becomes darker or lighter. This allows us to see in both darkened rooms and on bright sunny days. Although the area of a pupil can change by as much as a factor of ten (Winn et al., 1994), we are not aware of the small movements in the ocular muscles that open and close our pupils.

Recent studies have painted a complex and fascinating picture of what drives these changes in pupil size. Despite representing the lowest level of visual function, these pupil dynamics can reflect sophisticated processes that are closely linked to our everyday experience (including attention, decision making, and even aesthetic experiences; Binda and Murray, 2015; Hartmann and Fischer, 2014). Therefore, measurements of the pupils, also known as pupillometry, may be used as an indicator for cognitive and perceptual states. This method is also objective and non-invasive, and can, therefore be applied in a wide range of clinical contexts. For example, it enables us to communicate with patients suffering from ‘locked-in’ syndrome – a condition characterized by the paralysis of every muscle except the eye (Stoll et al., 2013).

Now, in eLife, Marco Turi, David Burr and Paola Binda – who are based at research institutes in Pisa, Florence and Sydney – report that fluctuations in pupil size may provide insight into clinical disorders (Turi et al., 2018). The researchers used a well-known optical cylinder illusion that consists of two overlapping sets of black and white dots moving in opposite directions on a 2D plane (Figure 1A). Due to the different speeds of the dots, anyone looking at the dots usually sees a rotating 3D cylinder (Andersen and Bradley, 1998; Video 1 in Turi et al., 2018). However, since the resulting illusion makes it difficult to detect which color is at the front (and, thus, the direction of rotation), our visual system selects one interpretation at any given time. As a result, the perceived rotation switches direction every few seconds (Figure 1B). Such approaches, where the physical stimulus remains constant but our subjective perception changes, have been widely used to study the mechanisms underlying visual awareness (Kim and Blake, 2005).

Changes in pupil size depend on subjective visual perception.

(A) Turi et al. used a visual stimulus in which two sets of dots (white and black) moved in opposite directions (thin arrows). (B) To an observer this stimulus appears as a 3D cylinder that rotates …

To track any subjective change in perception, the participants reported how they experienced the rotation of the cylinder, while the researchers measured the pupil size. Although the overall intensity of light (the primary factor influencing pupil size) remained constant, the size of the pupils changed: the pupils became larger when the black dots seemed to be in the front, but became smaller, when the white dots appeared to be in front (Figure 1C).

In some participants, the size of the pupils changed substantially between the black and white phases, while in others the changes were only minimal. Turi et al. revealed that these differences strongly correlated with the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) scores of the participants (Baron-Cohen et al., 2001). The higher the number of autistic traits reported by an individual in the AQ questionnaire, the stronger the changes in pupil size became. This effect accounted for about half of the variance in AQ scores, which is considerably higher than the sizes of the effects reported for other sensory measures (e.g., Ujiie et al., 2015).

Turi et al. argue that the changes in pupil size reflect how individuals process visual information differently. Some people tend to focus on small, defined areas such as the surface at the front, while others concentrate on the entire cylinder. Consequently, people with a more detailed focus should have more fluctuations in pupil size, because their focus alternates between black and white dots. This observation is tightly linked with the long-standing hypothesis that individuals with autism spectrum disorders tend to focus more on the detail rather than the bigger picture (Happé and Frith, 2006).

The findings of Turi et al. provide compelling evidence that the size of a pupil reflects subjective differences in a way that is highly correlated to the reported autistic traits of the participants. The study provides numerous possibilities to investigate higher-level cognitive processes. This can be particularly valuable when studying individuals who may find it difficult to engage in complex behavioral tasks, such as individuals with minimal language skills or deficits in other cognitive abilities. Pupillometry is clearly a powerful tool for characterizing the individual differences in processing visual information and, potentially, for advancing our understanding of autism spectrum disorders.

References

    1. Winn B
    2. Whitaker D
    3. Elliott DB
    4. Phillips NJ
    (1994)
    Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects
    Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 35:1132–1137.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Woon Ju Park

    Woon Ju Park is in the Center for Visual Science and the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, United States.

    For correspondence
    woonju.park@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1473-4876
  2. Kimberly B Schauder

    Kimberly B Schauder is in the Center for Visual Science and the Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, University of Rochester, Rochester, United States.

    For correspondence
    kimberly.schauder@rochester.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6832-1044
  3. Duje Tadin

    Duje Tadin is in the Center for Visual Science and the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, United States, and the Departments of Ophthalmology and Neuroscience, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, United States.

    For correspondence
    dtadin@ur.rochester.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1571-5589

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published:

Copyright

© 2018, Park et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Download links

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Moritz Schloetter, Georg U Maret, Christoph J Kleineidam
    Research Article

    Neurons generate and propagate electrical pulses called action potentials which annihilate on arrival at the axon terminal. We measure the extracellular electric field generated by propagating and annihilating action potentials and find that on annihilation, action potentials expel a local discharge. The discharge at the axon terminal generates an inhomogeneous electric field that immediately influences target neurons and thus provokes ephaptic coupling. Our measurements are quantitatively verified by a powerful analytical model which reveals excitation and inhibition in target neurons, depending on position and morphology of the source-target arrangement. Our model is in full agreement with experimental findings on ephaptic coupling at the well-studied Basket cell-Purkinje cell synapse. It is able to predict ephaptic coupling for any other synaptic geometry as illustrated by a few examples.

    1. Neuroscience
    Ulrike Pech, Jasper Janssens ... Patrik Verstreken
    Research Article

    The classical diagnosis of Parkinsonism is based on motor symptoms that are the consequence of nigrostriatal pathway dysfunction and reduced dopaminergic output. However, a decade prior to the emergence of motor issues, patients frequently experience non-motor symptoms, such as a reduced sense of smell (hyposmia). The cellular and molecular bases for these early defects remain enigmatic. To explore this, we developed a new collection of five fruit fly models of familial Parkinsonism and conducted single-cell RNA sequencing on young brains of these models. Interestingly, cholinergic projection neurons are the most vulnerable cells, and genes associated with presynaptic function are the most deregulated. Additional single nucleus sequencing of three specific brain regions of Parkinson’s disease patients confirms these findings. Indeed, the disturbances lead to early synaptic dysfunction, notably affecting cholinergic olfactory projection neurons crucial for olfactory function in flies. Correcting these defects specifically in olfactory cholinergic interneurons in flies or inducing cholinergic signaling in Parkinson mutant human induced dopaminergic neurons in vitro using nicotine, both rescue age-dependent dopaminergic neuron decline. Hence, our research uncovers that one of the earliest indicators of disease in five different models of familial Parkinsonism is synaptic dysfunction in higher-order cholinergic projection neurons and this contributes to the development of hyposmia. Furthermore, the shared pathways of synaptic failure in these cholinergic neurons ultimately contribute to dopaminergic dysfunction later in life.