Natural selection and repeated patterns of molecular evolution following allopatric divergence

  1. Yibo Dong
  2. Shichao Chen
  3. Shifeng Cheng
  4. Wenbin Zhou
  5. Qing Ma
  6. Zhiduan Chen
  7. Cheng-Xin Fu
  8. Xin Liu  Is a corresponding author
  9. Yun-peng Zhao  Is a corresponding author
  10. Pamela S Soltis  Is a corresponding author
  11. Gane Ka-Shu Wong  Is a corresponding author
  12. Douglas E Soltis  Is a corresponding author
  13. Jenny Xiang  Is a corresponding author
  1. North Carolina State University, United States
  2. University of Florida, United States
  3. Beijing Genomics Institute, China
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
  5. Zhejiang University, China

Abstract

Although geographic isolation is a leading driver of speciation, the tempo and pattern of divergence at the genomic level remain unclear. We examine genome-wide divergence of putatively single-copy orthologous genes (POGs) in 20 allopatric species/variety pairs from diverse angiosperm clades, with 16 pairs reflecting the classic eastern Asia-eastern North America floristic disjunction. In each pair, >90% of POGs are under purifying selection, and <10% are under positive selection. A set of POGs are under strong positive selection, 14 of which are shared by 10-15 pairs, and one shared by all pairs; 15 POGs are annotated to biological processes responding to various stimuli. The relative abundance of POGs under different selective forces exhibits a repeated pattern among pairs despite an ~10-million-year difference in divergence time. Species divergence times are positively correlated with abundance of POGs under moderate purifying selection, but negatively correlated with abundance of POGs under strong purifying selection.

Data availability

Sequences of ortologous gene families and pairs of POGs sequences used for calculation of Ka and Ks have been submitted to Dryad (https://datadryad.org//). Raw transcriptome data have been submitted to NCBI SRA database with Bioproject number PRJNA508825 and Biosample number from SAMN10534244 to SAMN10534283 (Supplementary File 11).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yibo Dong

    Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Shichao Chen

    Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Shifeng Cheng

    Beijing Genomics Institute, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Wenbin Zhou

    Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Qing Ma

    Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Zhiduan Chen

    State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Cheng-Xin Fu

    Laboratory of Systematic & Evolutionary Botany and Biodiversity, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Xin Liu

    Beijing Genomics Institute, Shenzen, China
    For correspondence
    liuxin@genomics.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Yun-peng Zhao

    Laboratory of Systematic & Evolutionary Botany and Biodiversity, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    For correspondence
    ypzhao913@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Pamela S Soltis

    Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    For correspondence
    psoltis@flmnh.ufl.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Gane Ka-Shu Wong

    Beijing Genomics Institute, Shenzen, China
    For correspondence
    gane@ualberta.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Douglas E Soltis

    Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    For correspondence
    dsoltis@ufl.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Jenny Xiang

    Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States
    For correspondence
    jenny_xiang@ncsu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9016-0678

Funding

National Science Foundation (DEB-442161)

  • Yibo Dong
  • Wenbin Zhou
  • Jenny Xiang

National Science Foundation (DEB-442280)

  • Shichao Chen
  • Pamela S Soltis
  • Douglas E Soltis

National Science Foundation of China (IOS-024629)

  • Shichao Chen
  • Yun-peng Zhao

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Daniel J Kliebenstein, University of California, Davis, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: January 15, 2019
  2. Accepted: August 1, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 2, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 13, 2019 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: September 20, 2019 (version 3)
  6. Version of Record updated: January 17, 2020 (version 4)

Copyright

© 2019, Dong et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,946
    Page views
  • 481
    Downloads
  • 10
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yibo Dong
  2. Shichao Chen
  3. Shifeng Cheng
  4. Wenbin Zhou
  5. Qing Ma
  6. Zhiduan Chen
  7. Cheng-Xin Fu
  8. Xin Liu
  9. Yun-peng Zhao
  10. Pamela S Soltis
  11. Gane Ka-Shu Wong
  12. Douglas E Soltis
  13. Jenny Xiang
(2019)
Natural selection and repeated patterns of molecular evolution following allopatric divergence
eLife 8:e45199.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45199

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Naeem Yusuf Shaikh, Kartik Sunagar
    Research Article Updated

    Spider venoms are a complex concoction of enzymes, polyamines, inorganic salts, and disulfide-rich peptides (DRPs). Although DRPs are widely distributed and abundant, their bevolutionary origin has remained elusive. This knowledge gap stems from the extensive molecular divergence of DRPs and a lack of sequence and structural data from diverse lineages. By evaluating DRPs under a comprehensive phylogenetic, structural and evolutionary framework, we have not only identified 78 novel spider toxin superfamilies but also provided the first evidence for their common origin. We trace the origin of these toxin superfamilies to a primordial knot – which we name ‘Adi Shakti’, after the creator of the Universe according to Hindu mythology – 375 MYA in the common ancestor of Araneomorphae and Mygalomorphae. As the lineages under evaluation constitute nearly 60% of extant spiders, our findings provide fascinating insights into the early evolution and diversification of the spider venom arsenal. Reliance on a single molecular toxin scaffold by nearly all spiders is in complete contrast to most other venomous animals that have recruited into their venoms diverse toxins with independent origins. By comparatively evaluating the molecular evolutionary histories of araneomorph and mygalomorph spider venom toxins, we highlight their contrasting evolutionary diversification rates. Our results also suggest that venom deployment (e.g. prey capture or self-defense) influences evolutionary diversification of DRP toxin superfamilies.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Arianne M Babina, Serhiy Surkov ... Michael Knopp
    Research Article

    Increasing numbers of small proteins with diverse physiological roles are being identified and characterized in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems, but the origins and evolution of these proteins remain unclear. Recent genomic sequence analyses in several organisms suggest that new functions encoded by small open reading frames (sORFs) may emerge de novo from noncoding sequences. However, experimental data demonstrating if and how randomly generated sORFs can confer beneficial effects to cells are limited. Here we show that by up-regulating hisB expression, de novo small proteins (≤ 50 amino acids in length) selected from random sequence libraries can rescue Escherichia coli cells that lack the conditionally essential SerB enzyme. The recovered small proteins are hydrophobic and confer their rescue effect by binding to the 5' end regulatory region of the his operon mRNA, suggesting that protein binding promotes structural rearrangements of the RNA that allow increased hisB expression. This study adds RNA regulatory elements as another interacting partner for de novo proteins isolated from random sequence libraries, and provides further experimental evidence that small proteins with selective benefits can originate from the expression of nonfunctional sequences.