Nitrogen is an essential part of many of the cell’s building blocks, including amino acids and nucleotides, which form proteins and DNA respectively. Therefore, nitrogen has to be available to cells so that they can survive and grow. In nature, some microorganisms convert the gaseous form of nitrogen into ammonium, which then acts as the nitrogen source of most organisms, including bacteria, plants and animals. Once cells take up ammonium, it is ‘fixed’ by becoming part of an amino acid called glutamate, which has a so-called ‘amine group’ that contains a nitrogen. Glutamate then becomes the central source for passing these amines on to other molecules, distributing nitrogen throughout the cell.

This coupling between ammonium fixation and glutamate production evolved over millions of years and occurs in all organisms. However, the complete metabolic network that underlies the distribution of amines remains poorly understood despite decades of research. Furthermore, it is not clear whether ammonium can be fixed in a way that is independent of glutamate.

To answer these questions, Schulz-Mirbach et al. used genetic engineering to create a strain of the bacterium E. coli that was unable to make glutamate. These mutant cells could only grow in the presence of certain amino acids, which acted as alternative amine sources. Schulz-Mirbach et al. found that enzymes called transaminases, and one called AspC in particular, were required for the cells to be able to produce glutamate using the amine groups from other amino acids. Notably, Schulz-Mirbach et al. showed that AspC, which had previously been shown to use an amino acid called aspartate as a source of amine groups, is indispensable if the cell is to use the amine groups from other amino acids – including histidine, tyrosine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, methionine, isoleucine and leucine.

Schulz-Mirbach et al. also discovered that if they engineered the E. coli cells to produce transaminases from other species, the repertoire of molecules that the cells could use as the source of amines to generate glutamate increased. In a final set of experiments, Schulz-Mirbach et al. were able to engineer the cells to fix ammonium by producing aspartate and leucine, thus entirely bypassing the deleted routes of glutamate synthesis. These data suggest that fixing ammonium and distributing nitrogen in E. coli can be very flexible.

The results from these experiments may shed light on how cells adapt when there is not a lot of ammonium available. Moreover, this study could advance efforts at metabolic engineering, for example, to create molecules through new pathways or to boost the production of amino acids needed for industrial purposes.

Nitrogen is essential for all forms of life as it is part of 75% of the cell’s building blocks (mainly in proteins and nucleic acids) (Milo and Phillips, 2015). The conversion of atmospheric dinitrogen (N₂) to ammonia (NH₃) by diazotrophic bacteria or industrially by the Haber–Bosch process is essential to make it available for assimilation by plants and other organisms to produce nitrogenous compounds.

While carbon fixation has evolved several times, resulting in versatile naturally occurring ways of carbon fixation (Löwe and Kremling, 2021), the introduction of ammonium (NH₄⁺, protonated form of ammonia) into the building blocks of life is similar in all organisms and limited to the fixation of ammonium at the node between 2-ketoglutarate, glutamate, and glutamine (Figure 1). Here, three cooperating canonical enzymes assimilate ammonium in two distinct ways. In the first reaction, glutamate is the direct product of glutamate dehydrogenase (gdhA, GDH). In the second pathway, the combined activity of glutamine synthetase (glnA, GS) and glutamate synthase (glutamine 2-ketoglutarate aminotransferase, gltBD, GOGAT) fixes another ammonium and converts glutamate into glutamine, which then donates one amine to 2-ketoglutarate to form two glutamate molecules (Helling, 1994; Kumar and Shimizu, 2010; Figure 1). To make all essential amino acids and other aminated compounds, glutamate and glutamine then donate their amines to specific keto acids or other amino acid precursors in reversible transferase reactions. As ammonium enters metabolism solely via these two routes, all cellular nitrogen is provided by either glutamate (75%) or glutamine (25%) (Yang et al., 2018).

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

Besides the glutamate biosynthesis node, alternative entry points for ammonium theoretically exist, for example, alanine dehydrogenase or aspartate ammonia lyase, but these are not relevant for ammonium assimilation (Kim and Hollocher, 1982). Evolution has developed a system for ammonium assimilation, which is controlled by its intracellular availability. The ATP investment driving GS activity makes amination reactions favorable even at low ammonium concentrations. Additionally, most of the GS orthologs have evolved kinetic parameters optimized for lower ammonium concentrations with an apparent K_M of 0.1 mM for ammonium (Reitzer, 2014). At high ammonium concentrations, the NADPH-dependent (and thus energetically cheaper) GDH allows more efficient ammonium assimilation than GS (Reitzer, 2014). This metabolic switch might explain the prominence of glutamate-based ammonium assimilation as opposed to other ammonia entry points in nature. To generate the NADPH required for GDH, Escherichia coli mostly uses the membrane-bound proton-translocating transhydrogenase (PntAB) (Sauer et al., 2004). This enzyme exploits the proton motif force to drive proton translocation from NADH to NADP⁺ (Spaans et al., 2015), and thereby indirectly competes with ATP synthesis. Therefore, when growing under high ammonium concentrations, growth of this microorganism might benefit from ammonium assimilation via NADH-dependent dehydrogenases.

Following these thoughts, we tried to assess whether alternative routes for ammonium assimilation can arise from the metabolic network of E. coli. For this purpose, we systematically investigated the flexibility of the amination network in a glutamate auxotrophic – and hence ammonium assimilation deficient – E. coli strain. This study provides fundamental knowledge on the plasticity of ammonium metabolism in E. coli and moreover addresses industrial interests by providing a versatile bacterial chassis for screening and optimization of ammonium assimilation and transamination reactions.

Our study provides a broad investigation of amino acid and ammonium metabolism in E. coli. To examine which amino acids can be used as an amine source to compensate for the absence of canonical glutamate production, we created a glutamate auxotrophic (glut-aux) strain and tested its ability to grow on different amino acids (Figure 2, supportive summary in Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Our experiments revealed that the glut-aux did not grow on all tested amino acids. Here, we note that the substrate spectrum of the underlying amination network might be larger than identified by our experiments since for some amino acids we cannot rule out that their uptake limits their intracellular availability to the network. Specifically, this might be the case for valine, threonine, and β-alanine, which did not support growth of any strain. However, for some of these, previous studies identified the mechanisms preventing utilization as an amine source. For example, use of threonine as nitrogen source would require induction of threonine dehydrogenase by the presence of leucine (Potter et al., 1977). Growth in the presence of valine was shown to be inhibited due to valine-dependent inhibition of acetohydroxy acid synthase essential to isoleucine biosynthesis (Tuite et al., 2005). In contrast, other amino acids known to be suitable nitrogen sources for the wildtype and canonical transamination products of glutamate did not rescue growth of the glut-aux strain via the reverse reaction (i.e., alanine). For this amino acid, we identified alanine degradation as the counteracting pathway. The glut-aux strain was capable of growth on most amino acids (proline, aspartate, asparagine, methionine, leucine, isoleucine, valine, glutamate, glutamine, ornithine, tyrosine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, and histidine). As absence of nitrogen from the medium only affected growth of the glut-aux on ornithine, we concluded that nitrogen response-dependent regulation was of minor relevance for amino acid metabolism. We assumed that in order for the glut-aux strain to grow, amino acids could either (i) fully replace glutamate as an amine donor, (ii) donate their amine directly to 2-ketoglutarate, (iii) be converted into an intermediate donating an amine to 2-ketoglutarate to form glutamate, or (iv) be direct glutamate precursors. Given the inability of the selection strain to synthesize glutamate, intracellular glutamate levels are expected to be lower than in a wildtype strain under saturating nitrogen availability. Therefore, some of the identified rescue mechanisms might not be the universally favored metabolic options. However, defining the mechanisms of growth restoration in the glut-aux strain might give insights into strategies of adaptation to limiting ammonium availability. To investigate which reactions allowed amine utilization from amino acids, we deleted several genes responsible for the respective amino acid degradation pathway. While proline was directly converted to glutamate (rescue mechanism IV, Figure 1), utilization of histidine, tyrosine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, methionine, isoleucine, and leucine depended on transamination mediated by AspC, one of the three main transaminases in E. coli (Gelfand and Steinberg, 1977; rescue mechanism II, Figure 1). Three aspects of this finding were surprising to us. First, deletion of AspC alone was sufficient to abolish growth of the glut-aux strain on tyrosine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, and leucine. This was unexpected since the other two main transaminases TyrB and IlvE share cross-reactivities with these amino acids and indicates that in spite of their cross-reactivity they cannot fully replace AspC in vivo. Residual tyrosine and phenylalanine aminotransferase activity in tyrB and ilvE knockout strains in previous works (Gelfand and Steinberg, 1977) led to the hypothesis that AspC was mainly exhibiting these activities, which herewith is further supported. Second, deletion of AspC abolished growth on histidine, methionine, isoleucine, and leucine for which only low or no specific activity of AspC was reported in vitro (Hayashi et al., 1993; Powell and Morrison, 1978). Under physiological conditions, the substrate range of AspC thus seems to be broader than previously anticipated. Third, the glut-aux ΔaspC strain was unable to grow with tryptophan as an amine source. Although activity of ΑspC with tryptophan was demonstrated in vitro (Hayashi et al., 1993; Powell and Morrison, 1978), transamination is not a known tryptophan degradation pathway in E. coli (Reitzer, 2014). We hence conclude that in the glut-aux strain, tryptophan is the direct substrate of AspC to form (indole-3-yl)-pyruvate and glutamate as in some bacteria (e.g., P. aeruginosa [Bortolotti et al., 2016], Clostridium sporogenes [O’Neil and DeMoss, 1968]), protozoa (Trichomonas vaginalis [Lowe and Rowe, 1985]), or mammals (Shrawder and Martinez-Carrion, 1972). Grouping amino acids by expected rescue mechanism and rescue phenotype (Figure 2—figure supplement 1) revealed that the majority of amino acids we suggest to be used via direct transamination rescued the glut-aux strain, but were not a good amine source for the wildtype (Figure 2, Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Additionally, we found AspC to be essential for the growth of the glut-aux on all amino acids not supporting WT growth (Figure 5). Therefore, we suggest promiscuous transaminase activity here rescuing growth of the glut-aux. strain to be one mechanism for adaptation to lacking glutamate availability. Hence, our study expands previous knowledge by several novel transamination routes in E. coli, which need to be considered in contexts of low amine or glutamate availability.

In addition to identifying natively present routes of amino acid metabolism, we demonstrated how amino acid metabolism can be rewired to allow utilization of new amine sources. Overexpression of alanine-2-ketoglutarate aminotransferase, together with the removal of an alanine sink, allowed usage of alanine as an amine source. By overexpressing transaminases that transfer amines from β-alanine to 2-ketoglutarate, we engineered usage of the non-proteinogenic amino acid β-alanine as amine source. Following the same logic, we expressed an aspartate-glyoxylate aminotransferase to select for its reverse activity with glycine or serine. Upon deletion of the d-amino acid dehydrogenase gene dadA as potential internal sink for glycine and serine, the engineered strain was able to use the amine from glycine to support growth. Surprisingly, we discovered that the strain did not use glycine directly, but converted it to serine, which was yet another substrate of the transaminase showing high activity for serine (k_cat of 25.87 s^–1) with oxaloacetate as amine acceptor. In principle, the newly discovered serine-oxaloacetate transaminase activity can be coupled to formate assimilation via the reductive glycine pathway (Kim et al., 2020), which fixes ammonium by reverse activity of the glycine cleavage system. This allows ammonium transfer to make aspartate and convert serine to hydroxypyruvate instead of pyruvate (generated via serine deaminase activity in the reductive glycine pathway), hence saving ATP needed to convert pyruvate into PEP, essential for anaplerosis and gluconeogenesis. The usage of alanine, β-alanine, glycine, and serine as amine donors was engineered in the glut-aux strain by transaminase overexpression and (if necessary) removal of intracellular substrate sinks. Thus, we conclude that for these amino acids, transaminase availability was the main bottleneck rather than transport or regulatory issues. In addition to this finding, these examples demonstrate the glut-aux strain as an excellent selection platform to screen for any reaction that produces amino acids which can rescue growth. This potentially allows the discovery of new amine sources.

The function of glutamate as a universal amine transfer molecule originates in its role as canonical entry point of ammonium into metabolism (Kumada et al., 1993). We were interested in finding out whether the prominence of this ammonium assimilation mechanism can be explained by a significant advantage compared to other mechanisms of ammonium assimilation. To investigate this, we replaced canonical ammonium assimilation via glutamate biosynthesis with two alternative pathways. Both fumarate amination to aspartate and MOP amination to leucine reconstituted the ability of the glut-aux strain to assimilate free ammonium. Growth dependent on ammonium assimilation via AspA was fastest when a carbon source metabolically close to fumarate was provided. We note that assimilation of ammonium via aspartate ammonia lyase is energetically different from ammonium assimilation via glutamate. While a glutamate-dependent amination network requires NADPH consumption by glutamate dehydrogenase, an aspartate ammonia lyase-dependent network requires NADH for the reduction of oxaloacetate back to fumarate; oxaloacetate being the transamination product of aspC. NADH is energetically cheaper compared to NADPH as the recovery of the latter from NADH wastes some proton motive force through the membrane-bound transhydrogenase, and hence comes with the indirect cost of ATP synthesis (Spaans et al., 2015). Although ammonium assimilation via aspartate or leucine biosynthesis led to immediate growth of the glut-aux strain in growth-optimized laboratory conditions, these do not reflect natural conditions under which glutamate-based ammonium assimilation might have evolved and become prominent. Under ammonium-limiting conditions, GDH and GS are kinetically superior with a K_M of 2 mM and 0.1 mM for ammonia, respectively (Reitzer, 2014), compared to AspA or LeuDH from B. cereus with K_M values of 20 mM and 13 mM for ammonia, respectively (Suzuki et al., 1973; Sanwal and Zink, 1961). Additionally, the availability of two different systems (GDH and GS/GOGAT), which are each optimal for different growth conditions but generate the same molecule, is unique to glutamate-based ammonium assimilation. Ammonium assimilation as metabolic link between energy, carbon, and nitrogen metabolism requires a tight multilayer regulation of GDH and GS. Thus, immediate growth via alternative ammonium assimilation routes that are independent of native transcriptional regulation, as achieved via aspartate and leucine in our study, is nontrivial. On the other hand, the laboratory cultivation conditions that allow this immediate growth do not require the metabolic flexibility and control given by the interplay and regulation of GDH and GS. It is even likely that growth of the engineered strains under nonoptimal conditions would be impaired by a lack of flexible metabolic responses to varying nitrogen and energy availability. This might explain the conservation of glutamate-coupled ammonium assimilation as opposed to alternative ammonium assimilation pathways. Furthermore, regulatory effects, for example, GS inhibition by several amino acids (e.g., tryptophan, histidine, alanine, glycine), might explain why some amino acids only supported slow growth of the glut-aux strain (Hubbard and Stadtman, 1967).

The possibility to modify ammonium assimilation and metabolism by metabolic engineering indicates that the underlying metabolic network is highly flexible, which is supported by highly promiscuous transaminases. However, transaminases are a limiting factor that defines the amination network, which implies the presence of different amination networks in different organisms that express different transaminases. That said, our study demonstrates how amino acid usage and even ammonium assimilation mechanisms are transferable by expressing heterologous genes. In this, we find that to allow such transferability between apparently different amination networks, the amine distribution network around the universally conserved core principle of glutamate-based amine assimilation must be highly flexible. Additionally, these engineering possibilities might have relevance for the metabolic engineering of synthetic pathways, for example, for growth-coupled selection (Orsi et al., 2021) or the production of certain amino acids or their derivatives. By engineering ammonium assimilation via non-glutamate-producing reactions, the cellular ammonium assimilation can be decoupled from glutamate biosynthesis for the production of nitrogenous compounds. Such decoupling follows the paradigm of modular design for bioengineering, which can support new endeavors for strain creation for biotechnological production processes. Here, the most obvious impact could be made on the million-ton-scale industrial amino acid production (Wendisch, 2020). Engineering new ammonium entry points as well as extending the amination network could positively affect these processes. For example, such metabolic network optimization was previously demonstrated by increased arginine production yields in Corynebacterium glutamicum upon expression of E. coli AspA and GlnA (Guo et al., 2017).

Altogether, our research addressed three distinct and complementary aspects regarding amino acid and ammonium metabolism. We provided a comprehensive overview of the options and limitations of the cellular amination network. Then, we showed its flexibility when engineering the network towards the use of new amine sources. Finally, by engineering new ammonium entry points, we increased the potential design space for engineering ammonium assimilation and dissimilation.

sequencing data has been deposited at Dryad.

1. 1. Schulz-Mirbach H
   2. Müller A
   3. Wu T
   4. Pfister P
   5. Aslan S
   6. Schada von Borzyskowski L
   7. Erb T
   8. Bar-Even A
   9. Lindner SN

   (2022) Dryad Digital Repository

   Data from: Flexibility of the cellular amination network in Escherichia coli.

   https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.mcvdnck2s

1. 1. Baba T
   2. Ara T
   3. Hasegawa M
   4. Takai Y
   5. Okumura Y
   6. Baba M
   7. Datsenko KA
   8. Tomita M
   9. Wanner BL
   10. Mori H

   (2006) Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection

   Molecular Systems Biology 2:2006–2008.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100050

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Bennett BD
   2. Kimball EH
   3. Gao M
   4. Osterhout R
   5. Van Dien SJ
   6. Rabinowitz JD

   (2009) Absolute metabolite concentrations and implied enzyme active site occupancy in Escherichia coli

   Nature Chemical Biology 5:593–599.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.186

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Bortolotti P
   2. Hennart B
   3. Thieffry C
   4. Jausions G
   5. Faure E
   6. Grandjean T
   7. Thepaut M
   8. Dessein R
   9. Allorge D
   10. Guery BP
   11. Faure K
   12. Kipnis E
   13. Toussaint B
   14. Le Gouellec A

   (2016) Tryptophan catabolism in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and potential for inter-kingdom relationship

   BMC Microbiology 16:137.

   https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0756-x

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Braatsch S
   2. Helmark S
   3. Kranz H
   4. Koebmann B
   5. Jensen PR

   (2008) Escherichia coli strains with promoter libraries constructed by Red/ET recombination pave the way for transcriptional fine-tuning

   BioTechniques 45:335–337.

   https://doi.org/10.2144/000112907

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Bren A
   2. Park JO
   3. Towbin BD
   4. Dekel E
   5. Rabinowitz JD
   6. Alon U

   (2016) Glucose becomes one of the worst carbon sources for E.coli on poor nitrogen sources due to suboptimal levels of cAMP

   Scientific Reports 6:24834.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24834

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Claassens NJ
   2. Satanowski A
   3. Bysani VR
   4. Dronsella B
   5. Orsi E
   6. Rainaldi V
   7. Yilmaz S
   8. Wenk S
   9. Lindner SN

   (2022) Engineering the reductive glycine pathway: a promising synthetic metabolism approach for c1-assimilation

   Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology 180:299–350.

   https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2021_181

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Datsenko KA
   2. Wanner BL

   (2000) One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products

   PNAS 97:6640–6645.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.120163297

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Deatherage DE
   2. Barrick JE

   (2014) Identification of mutations in laboratory-evolved microbes from next-generation sequencing data using breseq

   Methods in Molecular Biology 1151:165–188.

   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0554-6_12

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Dolzan M
   2. Johansson K
   3. Roig-Zamboni V
   4. Campanacci V
   5. Tegoni M
   6. Schneider G
   7. Cambillau C

   (2004) Crystal structure and reactivity of YbdL from Escherichia coli identify a methionine aminotransferase function

   FEBS Letters 571:141–146.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2004.06.075

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Dougherty TJ
    2. Thanassi JA
    3. Pucci MJ

    (1993) The Escherichia coli mutant requiring D-glutamic acid is the result of mutations in two distinct genetic loci

    Journal of Bacteriology 175:111–116.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.175.1.111-116.1993

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Frank L
    2. Ranhand B

    (1964) Proline metabolism in Escherichia coli: 3-the proline catabolic pathway

    Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 107:325–331.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(64)90338-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Franklin FC
    2. Venables WA

    (1976) Biochemical, genetic, and regulatory studies of alanine catabolism in Escherichia coli K12

    Molecular & General Genetics 149:229–237.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00332894

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Gelfand DH
    2. Steinberg RA

    (1977) Escherichia coli mutants deficient in the aspartate and aromatic amino acid aminotransferases

    Journal of Bacteriology 130:429–440.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.130.1.429-440.1977

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Giavalisco P
    2. Li Y
    3. Matthes A
    4. Eckhardt A
    5. Hubberten HM
    6. Hesse H
    7. Segu S
    8. Hummel J
    9. Köhl K
    10. Willmitzer L

    (2011) Elemental formula annotation of polar and lipophilic metabolites using (13) C, (15) N and (34) S isotope labelling, in combination with high-resolution mass spectrometry

    The Plant Journal 68:364–376.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04682.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Grote A
    2. Hiller K
    3. Scheer M
    4. Münch R
    5. Nörtemann B
    6. Hempel DC
    7. Jahn D

    (2005) JCat: a novel tool to adapt codon usage of a target gene to its potential expression host

    Nucleic Acids Research 33:W526–W531.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki376

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Guo J
    2. Man Z
    3. Rao Z
    4. Xu M
    5. Yang T
    6. Zhang X
    7. Xu Z

    (2017) Improvement of the ammonia assimilation for enhancing L-arginine production of Corynebacterium crenatum

    Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology 44:443–451.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-017-1900-9

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Hama H
    2. Sumita Y
    3. Kakutani Y
    4. Tsuda M
    5. Tsuchiya T

    (1990) Target of serine inhibition in Escherichia coli

    Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 168:1211–1216.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-291x(90)91157-n

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Hayashi H
    2. Inoue K
    3. Nagata T
    4. Kuramitsu S
    5. Kagamiyama H

    (1993) Escherichia coli aromatic amino acid aminotransferase: characterization and comparison with aspartate aminotransferase

    Biochemistry 32:12229–12239.

    https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00096a036

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Helling RB

    (1994) Why does Escherichia coli have two primary pathways for synthesis of glutamate?

    Journal of Bacteriology 176:4664–4668.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.176.15.4664-4668.1994

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Hubbard JS
    2. Stadtman ER

    (1967) Regulation of glutamine synthetase. II. Patterns of feedback inhibition in microorganisms

    Journal of Bacteriology 93:1045–1055.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.93.3.1045-1055.1967

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Inoue K
    2. Kuramitsu S
    3. Aki K
    4. Watanabe Y
    5. Takagi T
    6. Nishigai M
    7. Ikai A
    8. Kagamiyama H

    (1988) Branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase of Escherichia coli: overproduction and properties

    Journal of Biochemistry 104:777–784.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a122549

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Jensen SI
    2. Lennen RM
    3. Herrgård MJ
    4. Nielsen AT

    (2015) Seven gene deletions in seven days: Fast generation of Escherichia coli strains tolerant to acetate and osmotic stress

    Scientific Reports 5:17874.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17874

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Ju J
    2. Misono H
    3. Ohnishi K

    (2005) Directed evolution of bacterial alanine racemases with higher expression level

    Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 100:246–254.

    https://doi.org/10.1263/jbb.100.246

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Kang L
    2. Shaw AC
    3. Xu D
    4. Xia W
    5. Zhang J
    6. Deng J
    7. Wöldike HF
    8. Liu Y
    9. Su J

    (2011) Upregulation of MetC is essential for D-alanine-independent growth of an alr/dadX-deficient Escherichia coli strain

    Journal of Bacteriology 193:1098–1106.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01027-10

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Keseler IM
    2. Gama-Castro S
    3. Mackie A
    4. Billington R
    5. Bonavides-Martínez C
    6. Caspi R
    7. Kothari A
    8. Krummenacker M
    9. Midford PE
    10. Muñiz-Rascado L
    11. Ong WK
    12. Paley S
    13. Santos-Zavaleta A
    14. Subhraveti P
    15. Tierrafría VH
    16. Wolfe AJ
    17. Collado-Vides J
    18. Paulsen IT
    19. Karp PD

    (2021) The ecocyc database in 2021

    Frontiers in Microbiology 12:711077.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.711077

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Kim CH
    2. Hollocher TC

    (1982) 13N isotope studies on the pathway of ammonia assimilation in Bacillus megaterium and Escherichia coli

    Journal of Bacteriology 151:358–366.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.151.1.358-366.1982

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Kim SH
    2. Schneider BL
    3. Reitzer L

    (2010) Genetics and regulation of the major enzymes of alanine synthesis in Escherichia coli

    Journal of Bacteriology 192:5304–5311.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00738-10

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Kim S
    2. Lindner SN
    3. Aslan S
    4. Yishai O
    5. Wenk S
    6. Schann K
    7. Bar-Even A

    (2020) Growth of E. coli on formate and methanol via the reductive glycine pathway

    Nature Chemical Biology 16:538–545.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-020-0473-5

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Kitagawa M
    2. Ara T
    3. Arifuzzaman M
    4. Ioka-Nakamichi T
    5. Inamoto E
    6. Toyonaga H
    7. Mori H

    (2005) Complete set of ORF clones of Escherichia coli ASKA library (A complete set of E. coli K-12 ORF archive): unique resources for biological research

    DNA Research 12:291–299.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsi012

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Kumada Y
    2. Benson DR
    3. Hillemann D
    4. Hosted TJ
    5. Rochefort DA
    6. Thompson CJ
    7. Wohlleben W
    8. Tateno Y

    (1993) Evolution of the glutamine synthetase gene, one of the oldest existing and functioning genes

    PNAS 90:3009–3013.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.7.3009

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Kumar R
    2. Shimizu K

    (2010) Metabolic regulation of Escherichia coli and its gdhA, glnL, gltB, D mutants under different carbon and nitrogen limitations in the continuous culture

    Microbial Cell Factories 9:8.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-9-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Lal PB
    2. Schneider BL
    3. Vu K
    4. Reitzer L

    (2014) The redundant aminotransferases in lysine and arginine synthesis and the extent of aminotransferase redundancy in Escherichia coli

    Molecular Microbiology 94:843–856.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12801

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Li H
    2. Zhu D
    3. Hyatt BA
    4. Malik FM
    5. Biehl ER
    6. Hua L

    (2009) Cloning, protein sequence clarification, and substrate specificity of a leucine dehydrogenase from Bacillus sphaericus ATCC4525

    Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 158:343–351.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8304-2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Lowe PN
    2. Rowe AF

    (1985) Aspartate: 2-oxoglutarate aminotransferase from trichomonas vaginalis: Identity of aspartate aminotransferase and aromatic amino acid aminotransferase

    The Biochemical Journal 232:689–695.

    https://doi.org/10.1042/bj2320689

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Löwe H
    2. Kremling A

    (2021) In-depth computational analysis of natural and artificial carbon fixation pathways

    BioDesign Research 2021:1–23.

    https://doi.org/10.34133/2021/9898316

    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Lu J
    2. Zhang Y
    3. Sun D
    4. Jiang W
    5. Wang S
    6. Fang B

    (2016) The development of leucine dehydrogenase and formate dehydrogenase bifunctional enzyme cascade improves the biosynthsis of l-tert-leucine

    Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 180:1180–1195.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-016-2160-2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Mavrides C

    (1987) Transamination of aromatic amino acids in Escherichia coli

    Methods in Enzymology 142:253–267.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/s0076-6879(87)42035-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Miller TE
    2. Beneyton T
    3. Schwander T
    4. Diehl C
    5. Girault M
    6. McLean R
    7. Chotel T
    8. Claus P
    9. Cortina NS
    10. Baret J-C
    11. Erb TJ

    (2020) Light-powered CO₂ fixation in a chloroplast mimic with natural and synthetic parts

    Science 368:649–654.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz6802

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. Book

    1. Milo R
    2. Phillips R

    (2015)

    Cell Biology by the Numbers

    Garland Science.

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Moxley MA
    2. Sanyal N
    3. Krishnan N
    4. Tanner JJ
    5. Becker DF

    (2014) Evidence for hysteretic substrate channeling in the proline dehydrogenase and Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase coupled reaction of proline utilization A (PutA)

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 289:3639–3651.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.523704

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. Book

    1. Neidhardt FC
    2. Curtiss IR
    3. Ingraham JL
    4. Lin ECC
    5. Low JKB
    6. Magasanik B
    7. Reznikoff WS
    8. Riley M
    9. Schaechter M
    10. Umbarger HE

    (1996)

    Escherichia Coli and Salmonella, Cellular and Molecular Biology

    ASM Press.

    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Newman EB
    2. Batist G
    3. Fraser J
    4. Isenberg S
    5. Weyman P
    6. Kapoor V

    (1976) The use of glycine as nitrogen source by Escherichia coli K12

    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 421:97–105.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4165(76)90173-2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. O’Neil SR
    2. DeMoss RD

    (1968) Tryptophan transaminase from clostridium sporogenes

    Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 127:361–369.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(68)90237-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Orsi E
    2. Claassens NJ
    3. Nikel PI
    4. Lindner SN

    (2021) Growth-coupled selection of synthetic modules to accelerate cell factory development

    Nature Communications 12:5295.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25665-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Peña-Soler E
    2. Fernandez FJ
    3. López-Estepa M
    4. Garces F
    5. Richardson AJ
    6. Quintana JF
    7. Rudd KE
    8. Coll M
    9. Vega MC

    (2014) Structural analysis and mutant growth properties reveal distinctive enzymatic and cellular roles for the three major L-alanine transaminases of Escherichia coli

    PLOS ONE 9:e102139.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102139

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Potter R
    2. Kapoor V
    3. Newman EB

    (1977) Role of threonine dehydrogenase in Escherichia coli threonine degradation

    Journal of Bacteriology 132:385–391.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.132.2.385-391.1977

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Powell JT
    2. Morrison JF

    (1978) The purification and properties of the aspartate aminotransferase and aromatic-amino-acid aminotransferase from Escherichia coli

    European Journal of Biochemistry 87:391–400.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1978.tb12388.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Prieto-Santos MI
    2. Martín-Checa J
    3. Balaña-Fouce R
    4. Garrido-Pertierra A

    (1986) A pathway for putrescine catabolism in Escherichia coli

    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 880:242–244.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4165(86)90085-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Reitzer L

    (2003) Nitrogen assimilation and global regulation in Escherichia coli

    Annual Review of Microbiology 57:155–176.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090820

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. Book

    1. Reitzer L

    (2014)

    Amino Acid Synthesis

    Elsevier.

    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Sanwal BD
    2. Zink MW

    (1961) L-Leucine dehydrogenase of Bacillus cereus

    Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 94:430–435.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(61)90070-4

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Sauer U
    2. Canonaco F
    3. Heri S
    4. Perrenoud A
    5. Fischer E

    (2004) The soluble and membrane-bound transhydrogenases UdhA and PntAB have divergent functions in NADPH metabolism of Escherichia coli

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 279:6613–6619.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M311657200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Schada von Borzyskowski L
    2. Severi F
    3. Krüger K
    4. Hermann L
    5. Gilardet A
    6. Sippel F
    7. Pommerenke B
    8. Claus P
    9. Cortina NS
    10. Glatter T
    11. Zauner S
    12. Zarzycki J
    13. Fuchs BM
    14. Bremer E
    15. Maier UG
    16. Amann RI
    17. Erb TJ

    (2019) Marine Proteobacteria metabolize glycolate via the β-hydroxyaspartate cycle

    Nature 575:500–504.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1748-4

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Schneider BL
    2. Reitzer L

    (2012) Pathway and enzyme redundancy in putrescine catabolism in Escherichia coli

    Journal of Bacteriology 194:4080–4088.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.05063-11

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Schneider BL
    2. Hernandez VJ
    3. Reitzer L

    (2013) Putrescine catabolism is a metabolic response to several stresses in Escherichia coli

    Molecular Microbiology 88:537–550.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12207

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Shrawder E
    2. Martinez-Carrion M

    (1972) Evidence of phenylalanine transaminase activity in the isoenzymes of aspartate transaminase

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 247:2486–2492.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)45454-9

    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Spaans SK
    2. Weusthuis RA
    3. van der Oost J
    4. Kengen SWM

    (2015) NADPH-generating systems in bacteria and archaea

    Frontiers in Microbiology 6:742.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00742

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Suzuki S
    2. Yamaguchi J
    3. Tokushige M

    (1973) Studies on aspartase. I. Purification and molecular properties of aspartase from Escherichia coli

    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta- Enzymology 321:369–381.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2744(73)90092-2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Thomason LC
    2. Costantino N
    3. Court DL

    (2007) E. coli genome manipulation by P1 transduction

    Current Protocols in Molecular Biology Chapter 1:1–17.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142727.mb0117s79

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Tuite NL
    2. Fraser KR
    3. O’byrne CP

    (2005) Homocysteine toxicity in Escherichia coli is caused by a perturbation of branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis

    Journal of Bacteriology 187:4362–4371.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.13.4362-4371.2005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Vidra A
    2. Németh Á

    (2018) Bio-based 3-hydroxypropionic acid: a review

    Periodica Polytechnica Chemical Engineering 62:156–166.

    https://doi.org/10.3311/PPch.10861

    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Walsh CT

    (1989)

    Enzymes in the D-alanine branch of bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan assembly

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 264:2393–2396.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Wendisch VF

    (2020) Metabolic engineering advances and prospects for amino acid production

    Metabolic Engineering 58:17–34.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2019.03.008

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Wenk S
    2. Yishai O
    3. Lindner SN
    4. Bar-Even A

    (2018) An engineering approach for rewiring microbial metabolism

    Methods in Enzymology 608:329–367.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mie.2018.04.026

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Wild J
    2. Klopotowski T

    (1981) D-Amino acid dehydrogenase of Escherichia coli K12: positive selection of mutants defective in enzyme activity and localization of the structural gene

    Molecular & General Genetics 181:373–378.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00425614

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Wild J
    2. Hennig J
    3. Lobocka M
    4. Walczak W
    5. Kłopotowski T

    (1985) Identification of the dadX gene coding for the predominant isozyme of alanine racemase in Escherichia coli K12

    Molecular & General Genetics 198:315–322.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383013

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Yang Z
    2. Han Y
    3. Ma Y
    4. Chen Q
    5. Zhan Y
    6. Lu W
    7. Cai L
    8. Hou M
    9. Chen S
    10. Yan Y
    11. Lin M

    (2018) Global investigation of an engineered nitrogen-fixing Escherichia coli strain reveals regulatory coupling between host and heterologous nitrogen-fixation genes

    Scientific Reports 8:10928.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29204-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. You L
    2. Page L
    3. Feng X
    4. Berla B
    5. Pakrasi HB
    6. Tang YJ

    (2012) Metabolic pathway confirmation and discovery through (13)C-labeling of proteinogenic amino acids

    Journal of Visualized Experiments 26:e3583.

    https://doi.org/10.3791/3583

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Zelcbuch L
    2. Antonovsky N
    3. Bar-Even A
    4. Levin-Karp A
    5. Barenholz U
    6. Dayagi M
    7. Liebermeister W
    8. Flamholz A
    9. Noor E
    10. Amram S
    11. Brandis A
    12. Bareia T
    13. Yofe I
    14. Jubran H
    15. Milo R

    (2013) Spanning high-dimensional expression space using ribosome-binding site combinatorics

    Nucleic Acids Research 41:e98.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt151

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Zimmer DP
    2. Soupene E
    3. Lee HL
    4. Wendisch VF
    5. Khodursky AB
    6. Peter BJ
    7. Bender RA
    8. Kustu S

    (2000) Nitrogen regulatory protein C-controlled genes of Escherichia coli: scavenging as a defense against nitrogen limitation

    PNAS 97:14674–14679.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.26.14674

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Helena Schulz-Mirbach

   Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany

   Contribution

   Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5376-9185

2. Alexandra Müller

   Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany

   Contribution

   Investigation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Tong Wu

   Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany

   Contribution

   Investigation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Pascal Pfister

   Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany

   Contribution

   Investigation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Selçuk Aslan

   Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany

   Contribution

   Supervision

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

6. Lennart Schada von Borzyskowski

   1. Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany
   2. Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

7. Tobias J Erb

   1. Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany
   2. Center for Synthetic Microbiology (SYNMIKRO), Marburg, Germany

   Contribution

   Supervision, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

8. Arren Bar-Even

   Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1039-4328

9. Steffen N Lindner

   1. Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany
   2. Department of Biochemistry, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   For correspondence

   Lindner@mpimp-golm.mpg.de

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3226-3043

• 1,893

  views

• 504

  downloads

• 12

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.