Histones: A new route to the nucleus

A newly discovered pathway suggests histone proteins H3 and H4 are imported into the nucleus as individual units rather than joined together as heterodimers as was previously thought.
  1. Hongyu Bao
  2. Hongda Huang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Key Laboratory of Molecular Design for Plant Cell Factory of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Department of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, China

The genetic material of animals, yeast and other eukaryotes is organized into a tightly wound structure known as chromatin which is stored inside the nuclei of cells. Chromatin is organized into subunits called nucleosomes that are made up of small segments of DNA wrapped around eight histone proteins: two copies of the protein H3 which each dimerize with an H4 protein, and two H2A proteins which each dimerize with another protein called H2B (Figure 1A; Luger et al., 1997). The two H3-H4 heterodimers then attach to one another to form a tetramer.

Model of the new pathway that imports histone proteins H3 and H4 into the nucleus.

(A) Three-dimensional structure of the nucleosome, a segment of DNA (grey) wrapped around eight histone proteins: two copies of H3 (green), H4 (orange), H2A (purple) and H2B (pink). H2A and H2B join together in a head to tail configuration to form a heterodimer (middle). H3 and H4 also connect in the same way, and the two heterodimers attach to one another via their helices (outlined by the box) to form a tetramer (right). Structures from PDB ID: 1AOI. (B) Pardal and Bowman have found a new pathway through which monomers of H3 and H4 are imported from the cytoplasm into the nucleus (black arrow) via the protein Imp5 (yellow circle; top left). Once inside the nucleus, H3 and H4 are transferred to a version of the NASP protein (known as sNASP) and the HAT1–RBBP7 complex, respectively, which together with other proteins help the two monomers dimerize (top middle). The H3-H4 heterodimer is then folded in the nucleus and assembled into one of three complexes which include different chaperone proteins (shown in pink; right). Previously it was thought that H3-H4 heterodimers were formed in the cytoplasm before being imported to the nucleus via a pathway mediated by Imp4 (mauve circle) and ASF1 (pink circle; bottom left). However, it is possible that this H3-H4-ASF1 complex detected in the cytoplasm may have leaked out from the nucleus, meaning the pathway discovered by Pardal and Bowman may be the dominant route H3 and H4 take in to the nucleus.

Image credit: Hongyu Bao (CC BY 4.0).

In order to divide, cells must replicate their DNA and histone proteins so that the genetic material that will be passed to their daughter cells can be assembled into chromatin. Half of the H3 and H4 histones that go in to the chromatin of each daughter cell are recycled from old tetramers and heterodimers, while the rest are newly synthesized structures. Freshly made H3 and H4 histones are also incorporated into chromatin throughout a cell’s lifetime during various DNA-related processes, like transcription.

For decades it was assumed that newly synthesized H3 and H4 histones dimerize in the cytoplasm and are then transported into the nucleus by two proteins: importin-4 (Imp4) and the histone chaperone ASF1 (Grover et al., 2018; Pardal et al., 2019; Bernardes and Chook, 2020). This nuclear import model was supported by previous experiments that found H3-H4 heterodimers in samples taken from the cytosol of cells. However, a study in 2018 suggested that preparation of these extracts may have ruptured the nuclear membrane, allowing H3-H4 heterodimers to leak out of the nucleus into the cytosol (Apta-Smith et al., 2018). This led the researchers to conclude that H3 and H4 may be transported into the nucleus as individual units or monomers. Now, in eLife, Alonso Pardal and Andrew Bowman from the University of Warwick – who are part of the research group that conducted the 2018 study – report new findings confirming this theory (Pardal and Bowman, 2022).

The nuclear import, dimerization, and incorporation of histone H3 and H4 into chromatin occur very rapidly, making it difficult to track each individual step. To overcome this issue, Pardal and Bowman designed H3 and H4 proteins which are unable to dimerize, and transiently expressed these mutant proteins in cells cultured in the laboratory. They found that both mutants were still imported into the nucleus, but were not incorporated into chromatin. This allowed Pardal and Bowman to work out which proteins the H3 and H4 monomers interact with inside cells.

Intriguingly, instead of binding to Imp4, both histones attached to Imp5, which suggests that they primarily associate with Imp5 when they are not bound to each other. Once in the nucleus, the mutants also interacted with distinct histone chaperone proteins: H3 monomers associated with a protein called NASP, while H4 monomers interacted with a protein complex called HAT1–RBBP7 (Figure 1B).

Next, Pardal and Bowman carried out further experiments to see how NASP and Imp5 cooperate when H3 is imported into the nucleus. This revealed that NASP was bound to at least twice as many wildtype H3 molecules as wildtype H4 molecules, indicating that there is a sub-pool of H3 monomers attached to NASP proteins. Additional biochemical experiments and analyses showed that NASP forms five distinct complexes with histones: two complexes that contain monomeric H3, and three that contain the H3-H4 heterodimer plus various chaperone proteins (Figure 1B). However, Imp5 was not detected in any of these NASP complexes, indicating that H3 cannot be bound to NASP and Imp5 simultaneously. This was supported by further in vitro experiments showing H3 being transferred from Imp5 to NASP.

Finally, Pardal and Bowman investigated how H3, Imp5 and NASP interact with one another in living cells using two techniques called mito-F2H and RAPID-release (Bowman et al., 2016; Apta-Smith et al., 2018). This revealed that there were 100 times more Imp5 proteins interacting with cytoplasmic H3 than Imp4 molecules, confirming that Imp5 is the major protein importing H3 into the nucleus. Once the Imp5-bound H3 monomer enters the nucleus, a version of the NASP protein (known as sNASP) immediately sequesters H3. Although Pardal and Bowman had not fully characterized the H4 monomers bound to HAT1-RBBP7, they propose that monomeric H4 enters the nucleus and is incorporated into chromatin in a similar way.

In summary, this research identifies a new pathway for importing histone proteins: newly synthesized H3 and H4 are transported into the nucleus as monomers by the protein Imp5, and are then handed off to NASP and the HAT1–RBBP7 complex in the nucleus, respectively (Figure 1B). Together with other proteins, NASP and HAT1–RBBP7 help H3 and H4 dimerize so they can be assembled into chromatin to compact DNA.

However, it is still unclear how this newly discovered route relates to the pathway that scientists have long thought was responsible for importing H3-H4 heterodimers. Further work will help to answer this question and shed light on the metabolism of histone proteins H3 and H4.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hongyu Bao

    Hongyu Bao is in the Key Laboratory of Molecular Design for Plant Cell Factory of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Department of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6563-1626
  2. Hongda Huang

    Hongda Huang is in the Key Laboratory of Molecular Design for Plant Cell Factory of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Department of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China

    For correspondence
    huanghd@sustech.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5376-4747

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: October 13, 2022 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2022, Bao and Huang

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,528
    views
  • 160
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hongyu Bao
  2. Hongda Huang
(2022)
Histones: A new route to the nucleus
eLife 11:e83308.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83308

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Richard Sejour, Janet Leatherwood ... Bruce Futcher
    Research Article

    Previously, Tuller et al. found that the first 30–50 codons of the genes of yeast and other eukaryotes are slightly enriched for rare codons. They argued that this slowed translation, and was adaptive because it queued ribosomes to prevent collisions. Today, the translational speeds of different codons are known, and indeed rare codons are translated slowly. We re-examined this 5’ slow translation ‘ramp.’ We confirm that 5’ regions are slightly enriched for rare codons; in addition, they are depleted for downstream Start codons (which are fast), with both effects contributing to slow 5’ translation. However, we also find that the 5’ (and 3’) ends of yeast genes are poorly conserved in evolution, suggesting that they are unstable and turnover relatively rapidly. When a new 5’ end forms de novo, it is likely to include codons that would otherwise be rare. Because evolution has had a relatively short time to select against these codons, 5’ ends are typically slightly enriched for rare, slow codons. Opposite to the expectation of Tuller et al., we show by direct experiment that genes with slowly translated codons at the 5’ end are expressed relatively poorly, and that substituting faster synonymous codons improves expression. Direct experiment shows that slow codons do not prevent downstream ribosome collisions. Further informatic studies suggest that for natural genes, slow 5’ ends are correlated with poor gene expression, opposite to the expectation of Tuller et al. Thus, we conclude that slow 5’ translation is a ‘spandrel’--a non-adaptive consequence of something else, in this case, the turnover of 5’ ends in evolution, and it does not improve translation.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Boglarka Zambo, Evelina Edelweiss ... Gergo Gogl
    Research Article

    Truncation of the protein-protein interaction SH3 domain of the membrane remodeling Bridging Integrator 1 (BIN1, Amphiphysin 2) protein leads to centronuclear myopathy. Here, we assessed the impact of a set of naturally observed, previously uncharacterized BIN1 SH3 domain variants using conventional in vitro and cell-based assays monitoring the BIN1 interaction with dynamin 2 (DNM2) and identified potentially harmful ones that can be also tentatively connected to neuromuscular disorders. However, SH3 domains are typically promiscuous and it is expected that other, so far unknown partners of BIN1 exist besides DNM2, that also participate in the development of centronuclear myopathy. In order to shed light on these other relevant interaction partners and to get a holistic picture of the pathomechanism behind BIN1 SH3 domain variants, we used affinity interactomics. We identified hundreds of new BIN1 interaction partners proteome-wide, among which many appear to participate in cell division, suggesting a critical role of BIN1 in the regulation of mitosis. Finally, we show that the identified BIN1 mutations indeed cause proteome-wide affinity perturbation, signifying the importance of employing unbiased affinity interactomic approaches.