Embryonic Development: The evolution of hearing and balance

  1. Forrest P Weghorst
  2. Karina S Cramer  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, Irvine, United States

Abstract

New genetic tools have allowed researchers to compare how the brainstem auditory and vestibular nuclei develop in embryonic chicks and mice.

Main text

The ear is an organ with two main roles – hearing and balance – and it relies on mechanically sensitive hair cells to perform both jobs. When the ear detects a sound, it sends signals to clusters of neurons called the brainstem auditory nuclei, and when it registers movement of the head, it sends signals to the brainstem vestibular nuclei. The vestibular nuclei are remarkably similar among vertebrates, from fish to humans (Fritzsch et al., 2014). However, the auditory nuclei display considerable diversity across species. For example, birds and mammals both have a pathway that uses the difference in the time of arrival of a sound at each ear to determine where the noise came from. However, this circuit works differently in these two groups of animals, suggesting that it may have emerged independently multiple times during evolution (Grothe and Pecka, 2014). How, then, did the modern auditory and vestibular nuclei arise?

One strategy to address this question is to explore the embryonic development of vertebrates. Nuclei in the brainstem arise from the embryonic hindbrain, which is remarkably similar across vertebrate species and is divided into segments called rhombomeres (Di Bonito and Studer, 2017). Fate mapping studies have been used to test whether cells in the auditory and vestibular nuclei of different vertebrate species derive from the same rhombomeres.

In this technique, embryonic tissue can be labeled with an external marker, such as a dye (for traditional fate mapping), or a fluorescent protein marker (for genetic fate mapping), in order to track the destination of the cells arising from that tissue (Stern and Fraser, 2001; Legué and Joyner, 2010). Previously, traditional fate mapping has been limited to research in birds (which have accessible embryos), while genetic fate mapping has been limited to mammals (which have accessible genomes; Cramer et al., 2000; Marín and Puelles, 1995; Kim and Dymecki, 2009).

However, both approaches have technical caveats and they identify progenitors in different ways, which hinders their direct comparison. Traditional fate mapping identifies the fate of all labeled cells within a restricted area of the embryo, which may contain a range of progenitor cell types. In contrast, genetic fate mapping marks only cells that express a certain gene (or genes), but these cells can come from a wider area within the embryo.

Now, in eLife, Marcela Lipovsek and Richard Wingate of King’s College London report how they have addressed this dilemma by using vector-based genetic fate mapping in chick embryos (Lipovsek and Wingate, 2018). The researchers focused on genes that were only active in certain regions of the embryonic hindbrain. Plasmid vectors were used to label cells with a fluorescent protein after specific genes in those cells were active. This way, the fate of cells along two anatomical axes (from head to tail, and from back to belly) could be traced. Lipovsek and Wingate studied the same genes that were previously used to construct genetic fate maps of brainstem nuclei in mice, which enabled them to draw direct comparisons between birds and mammals for the first time (Di Bonito and Studer, 2017).

Their results confirmed that vestibular nuclei have similar embryonic origins in chicks and mice. In contrast, auditory nuclei that have comparable roles in chicks and mice arise from completely different embryonic tissues. This suggests that birds and mammals used different populations of ancestral cells – often from different rhombomeres – to independently evolve circuits for calculating sound location.

Lipovsek and Wingate provide compelling evidence that the anatomical similarities between vestibular nuclei in birds and mammals are due to common developmental and evolutionary origins. And since their vestibular systems are also homologous to those of fish, it seems that the role of the vestibular organ remained relatively unaffected by our aquatic ancestors’ move to land (Fritzsch et al., 2014). Conversely, the different developmental origins of auditory nuclei in birds and mammals reflect how each clade solved the problem of hearing on land by adapting to its own ecological niche (Carr and Christensen-Dalsgaard, 2016).

References

  1. Book
    1. Fritzsch B
    2. Kopecky BJ
    3. Duncan JS
    (2014) Development of the mammalian ‘vestibular’ system: evolution of form to detect angular and gravity acceleration
    In: Romand R, Varela-Nieto I, editors. Development of Auditory and Vestibular Systems. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 339–367.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-408088-1.00012-9

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Forrest P Weghorst

    Forrest P Weghorst is in the Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, United States

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9365-1846
  2. Karina S Cramer

    Karina S Cramer is in the Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, United States

    For correspondence
    cramerk@uci.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3793-4862

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: February 8, 2019 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2019, Weghorst and Cramer

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,337
    Page views
  • 144
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Forrest P Weghorst
  2. Karina S Cramer
(2019)
Embryonic Development: The evolution of hearing and balance
eLife 8:e44567.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44567

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Noah P Mitchell et al.
    Research Article

    Organ architecture is often composed of multiple laminar tissues arranged in concentric layers. During morphogenesis, the initial geometry of visceral organs undergoes a sequence of folding, adopting a complex shape that is vital for function. Genetic signals are known to impact form, yet the dynamic and mechanical interplay of tissue layers giving rise to organs' complex shapes remains elusive. Here, we trace the dynamics and mechanical interactions of a developing visceral organ across tissue layers, from sub-cellular to organ scale in vivo. Combining deep tissue light-sheet microscopy for in toto live visualization with a novel computational framework for multilayer analysis of evolving complex shapes, we find a dynamic mechanism for organ folding using the embryonic midgut of Drosophila as a model visceral organ. Hox genes, known regulators of organ shape, control the emergence of high-frequency calcium pulses. Spatiotemporally patterned calciumpulses triggermuscle contractions via myosin light chain kinase. Muscle contractions, in turn, induce cell shape change in the adjacent tissue layer. This cell shape change collectively drives a convergent extension pattern. Through tissue incompressibility and initial organ geometry, this in-plane shape change is linked to out-of-plane organ folding. Our analysis follows tissue dynamics during organ shape change in vivo, tracing organ-scale folding to a high-frequency molecular mechanism. These findings offer a mechanical route for gene expression to induce organ shape change: genetic patterning in one layer triggers a physical process in the adjacent layer - revealing post-translational mechanisms that govern shape change.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Maja Solman et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Gain-of-function mutations in the protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 are the most frequently occurring mutations in sporadic juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) and JMML-like myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) associated with Noonan syndrome (NS). Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) are the disease propagating cells of JMML. Here, we explored transcriptomes of HSPCs with SHP2 mutations derived from JMML patients and a novel NS zebrafish model. In addition to major NS traits, CRISPR/Cas9 knock-in Shp2D61G mutant zebrafish recapitulated a JMML-like MPN phenotype, including myeloid lineage hyperproliferation, ex vivo growth of myeloid colonies, and in vivo transplantability of HSPCs. Single-cell mRNA sequencing of HSPCs from Shp2D61G zebrafish embryos and bulk sequencing of HSPCs from JMML patients revealed an overlapping inflammatory gene expression pattern. Strikingly, an anti-inflammatory agent rescued JMML-like MPN in Shp2D61G zebrafish embryos. Our results indicate that a common inflammatory response was triggered in the HSPCs from sporadic JMML patients and syndromic NS zebrafish, which potentiated MPN and may represent a future target for JMML therapies.