The chemical reactions that occur within a living organism are collectively referred to as its metabolism. Many metabolic reactions produce byproducts that will poison the cells if they are not dealt with: fermenting bacteria, for example, release harmful organic acids and alcohols. How the bacteria respond to these toxins has been most studied at the level of entire microbial populations, meaning the activities of individual cells are effectively “averaged” together. Yet, even two bacteria with the same genes and living in the same environment can behave in different ways. This raises the question: do bacterial populations specialize into distinct subpopulations that play distinct roles when dealing with metabolic products, or do all cells in the community act in unison?

Rosenthal et al. set out to answer this question for a community of Bacillus subtilis, a bacterium that is commonly studied in the laboratory and used for the industrial production of enzymes. The analysis focused on genes involved in fundamental metabolic processes, known as the TCA cycle, which the bacteria use to generate energy and build biomass. The experiments revealed that, even when all the cells are genetically identical, different Bacillus subtilis cells do indeed specialize into metabolic subpopulations with distinct growth rates.

Time-lapse movies of bacteria that made fluorescent markers of different colors whenever certain metabolic genes became active showed cells switching different colors on and off, indicating that they switch between metabolic subpopulations. Further biochemical studies and measures of gene activity revealed that the different subpopulations produce and release distinct metabolic products, including toxic byproducts. Notably, the release of these metabolites by one subpopulation appeared to activate other subpopulations within the community.

This example of cells specializing into unique interacting metabolic subpopulations provides insight into several fundamental issues in microbiology and beyond. It is relevant to evolutionary biologists, since the fact that fractions of the population can switch in and out of a metabolic state, instead of evolving into several inflexible specialists, may provide an evolutionary advantage in fluctuating natural environments by reducing the risk of extinction. It also has implications for industrial fermentation processes and metabolic engineering, and may help biotechnologists design more efficient ways to harness bacterial metabolism to produce useful products.

Co-utilization of carbon sources was described alongside diauxie by Jacques Monod in his PhD thesis (Monod, 1958), and is common in many organisms (Peyraud et al., 2012). In the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis, two preferred carbon sources are co-utilized: glucose and malate (Kleijn et al., 2010). When both of these carbon sources are available they are consumed simultaneously, generating growth rates that surpass those achieved with either substrate alone (Kleijn et al., 2010). Under conditions of rapid growth, co-consumption of glucose and malate leads to the accumulation of high levels of acetate (Kleijn et al., 2010). As a weak organic acid, acetate can be harmful to cells even in buffered medium (Rosenthal et al., 2008). Acetate and related short-chain fatty acids enter the cell passively in the neutral form and then dissociate intracellularly, releasing a proton and transiently acidifying the cytoplasm (Russell and Diez-Gonzalez, 1997; Roe et al., 1998). The intracellular dissociation of acetate also disrupts the cellular anion balance, with negative effects on metabolism (Roe et al., 1998; Roe et al., 2002) and transcription (Rosenthal et al., 2008). When extracellular acetate levels rise to toxic levels the growing Bacillus subtilis culture consumes the acetate and produces acetoin, a non-toxic pH-neutral overflow metabolite that can be used as a carbon source in later growth stages (Speck and Freese, 1973) (Figure 1A).

Figure 1 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

A biphasic growth strategy, in which acetate is produced to a toxic level and then reabsorbed and replaced by a non-toxic metabolite (Wolfe, 2005), is common to many bacterial species and is important both for understanding the basic biology of bacterial growth in culture, and for applications in metabolic engineering (Papagianni, 2012). However, it has generally been studied only at the population level, implicitly assuming a homogeneous progression of the entire culture from acetate producing to acetate detoxifying states. By contrast, single cell approaches suggest that bacterial populations can exhibit enormous heterogeneity in functional and gene expression states (Eldar et al., 2009; Locke et al., 2011; Süel et al., 2006; Levine et al., 2012; Davidson and Surette, 2008; Dubnau and Losick, 2006; Gefen and Balaban, 2009). This prompts the questions of whether microbial cells differentiate into metabolically distinct subpopulations, and more specifically, whether acetate production and detoxification might occur in distinct cells specializing in acetate production or detoxification, respectively.

To address these questions we constructed a library of strains with reporters for key genes involved in central carbon metabolism, acetate production, and organic acid detoxification (Figure 1A). We introduced a fluorescent protein (YFP) under the control of promoters for 13 different metabolic genes and stably incorporated them into the commonly used sacA site within the genome (Supplementary file 1), (Eldar et al., 2009; Locke et al., 2011). We chose to use fluorescent promoter reporters because they allow acquisition of dynamic measurements from individual living cells, are easy to construct and integrate into the B. subtilis genome, allow for analysis of multiple genes within the same cell, and can be used in fluorescence cell sorting for RNAseq experiments. Using quantitative single-cell fluorescence microscopy, we analyzed the distribution of expression levels of these 13 metabolic genes in individual cells at different times along the growth curve in buffered culture medium containing 22 mM glucose and 50 mM malate. To eliminate oxygen gradients, 10 mL cultures were grown in 250 mL flasks with rapid shaking (250 RPM).

Four genes had expression levels that were at or near background and were not considered further (acoA, gntZ, pycA, sdhC). Most of the genes showed unimodal distributions (Figure 1—figure supplement 1), with relatively little skew (less than ±0.7). Two genes, sucC and alsS, encoding succinate co-A ligase and acetolactate synthase, respectively, were more heterogeneous (Figure 1B). We observed skew values greater than 1 (4.72 and 1.14, respectively) with 3.8% of P_sucC-YFP and 8.1% of P_alsS-YFP cells exhibiting high expression levels (≥2 standard deviations above the mean) at OD₆₀₀ ~0.8 (sucC) and OD₆₀₀ ~2 (alsS). In addition, for both genes, we observed cells whose expression exceeded the mean by >3 fold. While gene expression distribution can be broader immediately after gene activation than at steady-state (Shahrezaei and Swain, 2008), both sucC and alsS maintained heterogeneous expression for several hours after the onset of expression. For these reasons, we decided to focus on these two genes for further study.

To better understand when this heterogeneity emerges in batch culture, we performed a time course analysis of the fraction of sucC and alsS positive cells (cells ≥ 2 standard deviations above the mean were denoted sucC+ and alsS+, Figure 1C). We observed that the subpopulation of sucC+ cells only existed transiently, in mid- to late-exponential phase (Figure 1C), coinciding with the time and culture optical density at which acetate production was observed (when the time derivative in acetate, that is, the rate of change in acetate concentration, is positive ~150–300 min, Figure 1D). This observation suggested that sucC expression could be involved in acetate production. A parallel analysis of alsS expression revealed the opposite behavior, with alsS expression dynamics coinciding with a decrease in acetate and a concomitant increase in acetoin levels (Figure 1C,D). This behavior is generally consistent with the known role of alsS in acetoin production in response to acetate toxicity (Speck and Freese, 1973). Together, these results show that a dynamic change in acetate and acetoin levels in the culture overlaps with changes in the population fraction of sucC and alsS expressing cells.

A role for sucC in acetate production has not been studied previously. To understand the relationship between the subpopulation marked sucC+ and acetate production, we used fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) of the P_sucCYFP reporter strain to sort cells expressing YFP from a SucC promoter at the time of peak acetate levels, and performed RNAseq to compare gene expression profiles (Figure 2A, Figure 2—figure supplement 1). As expected, sucC expression was elevated 2-fold in the sucC+ sorted subpopulation (blue dot, Figure 2A). This is particularly meaningful considering the fact that the fluorescent marker used for sorting is a stable reporter, making it likely that some sorted cells may have high level of fluorescent signal even after exiting the transcriptionally active state. For most genes, we observed a broad correlation in gene expression between the two populations. However, RNAseq analysis with cuffdiff (Trapnell et al., 2010) and gene set enrichment analysis with GSEA (Subramanian et al., 2005) showed that genetic competence genes (Berka et al., 2002) were significantly enriched in the ~300 upregulated genes in the sucC+ subpopulation (red dots and inset, −2A and supplementary file 2; GSEA p<e-16). The sucC+ population also exhibited increased expression of the phosphate acetyltransferase gene, pta (green dot, Figure 2A), the enzyme that catalyzes the final step in overflow acetate production. Thus, sucC expression marks a distinct gene expression state that could be involved in acetate production.

Figure 2 with 4 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Based on the strong correlation between sucC expression and competence gene expression in the RNAseq results (Figure 2A), we next asked whether the sucC+ population represented the competent state. To analyze the relationship between sucC expression and genetic competence in single cells, we constructed four dual reporter strains, expressing CFP from the sucC promoter and YFP from one of four competence promoters: comG, comK, nucA and rapH (Berka et al., 2002; Ogura et al., 2002). Imaging revealed a clear positive correlation between sucC and the competence genes (Figure 2B, Figure 2—figure supplement 2). This positive correlation was not general to all metabolic genes, as sucC expression was anti-correlated with pckA (Figure 2C, Figure 2—figure supplement 3), a gene involved in phosphoenolpyruvate synthesis (Meyer and Stülke, 2013). We note that pta (phosphate acetyltransferase gene) and sucC were previously observed to be up-regulated in the competent state (Berka et al., 2002; Ogura et al., 2002). Together, these results suggest that individual cells can exist in at least two distinct metabolic states, one of which represents genetically competent cells and involves increased expression of sucC and pta, among other genes.

We next assessed how competence might be linked to elevated acetate production. The competence system is controlled by a noise-excitable gene circuit that stochastically initiates transient episodes of differentiation in individual cells (Süel et al., 2007; Süel et al., 2006; Cağatay et al., 2009; Maamar et al., 2007; Hahn et al., 1994) To better understand the relationship between competence and acetate metabolism, we next asked whether activation of the competence system is necessary for increased sucC expression and acetate metabolism. Strains in which the competence master transcription factor comK is deleted (Supplementary File 1) exhibited greatly reduced acetate production (Figure 2D) and a loss of sucC as well as comG expression (Figure 2—figure supplement 4). In addition to the reduced level of acetate itself, expression of pta, the key step in acetate production, is greatly diminished in strains in which comK is deleted, both in our conditions (Figure 2—figure supplement 4B) and also in data from previous microarray experiments (Ogura et al., 2002; Berka et al., 2002). Although the competent state has been suggested to be involved in other functions, such as attachment, motility, antibiotic resistance, and DNA metabolism (Redfield, 1993; Hahn et al., 2015; Bakkali, 2013; Finkel and Kolter, 2001), a role in central carbon metabolism has not been reported. These results indicate that the sucC subpopulation is controlled by the competence system, linking competence both to an alternative metabolic state and to the control of acetate levels in culture.

To better understand the dynamics with which cells switch into the competent state and later into the alsS+ state, we used the ‘Mother Machine’ microfluidic device (Figure 3A), to conduct long-term analysis of individual cells over tens of cell generations under chemostatic conditions (Wang et al., 2010; Norman et al., 2013). We set up the Mother Machine as described previously (Norman et al., 2013), but cultured cells with conditioned media obtained from batch growth of B. subtilis cultures at different final optical densities. Specifically, we used media from cultures at OD₆₀₀ 0.8 and OD₆₀₀ 2.0, points during the peak of sucC+ or alsS+ expression, respectively. This approach provides the simplicity of long-term chemostatic analysis with the ability to compare cellular behavior at different culture time-points.

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Using the Mother Machine, we analyzed cell lineages for up to 4 days (approximately 60 generations) for a total of 1,400 cell generations (Figure 3B). We tabulated the number of activation events per hour occurring in the terminal (top) cell of each channel, as well as the length of time that cells remained in an activated state (dwell time). Finally, we also measured the length of cells through successive frames of the movie, to obtain the mean relative elongation rates of alsS+ and alsS- cells (Materials and Methods).

With sucC-inducing media (conditioned at OD 0.8), we observed rare episodes of sucC activation in some cells, lasting for approximately four hours each (252 ± 89 min, mean ±standard deviation for n = 31 events) (Figure 3B, left). Consistent with previous analysis of competence dynamics (Süel et al., 2006), sucC+ cells divided less frequently and grew more slowly than other cells in the same movies (elongation rates of 47.4 ± 2.7 %/hr and 67.7 ± 2.3 %/hr, respectively). Cells in the activated state could switch out of the sucC+ state and resume normal growth rates (Figure 3—figure supplement 1, Video 1). Under these conditions, we did not observe activation of alsS expression. By contrast, in the OD 2.0 conditioned media we did not observe activation of sucC expression, but did observe frequent pulses of alsS gene expression. alsS+ cells grew at a slightly reduced elongation rate (63 ± 2.6 %/hr increase compared to 74 ± 2.3 %/hr for alsS- cells, Figure 3B, right panel, Video 2). Together, these results provide rates of transitions into the sucC+ (competent) and alsS+ gene expression states, and show that these states have altered growth rates and respond to medium composition.

Video 1

Download asset

Video 2

Download asset

These results further suggested the possibility that acetate predominantly produced by sucC+ cells early in the growth could induce cell switching to the alsS+ state in later growth stages, when it accumulates to toxic levels. However, many media components could differ between the OD₆₀₀ 0.8 and OD₆₀₀ 2.0 cultures. To determine whether acetate was sufficient to affect alsS expression, we cultured reporter cells in varying levels of acetate, in unconditioned liquid medium, and quantified the fraction of alsS+ cells. We observed both a systematic increase in the distribution of alsS expression levels, and in the fraction of cells in the high expressing ‘tail’ of the distribution (Figure 3C).

The Mother Machine is ideal for analyzing cells over multiple generations in a relatively constant environment but not ideal for analyzing responses to environmental changes that happen as a consequence of growth. We therefore designed microcolony pad experiments in which acetate was added to standard microcolony medium (Eldar et al., 2009; Locke et al., 2011; Young et al., 2011) to 20 mM, the acetate concentration present in mid-exponential phase (Figure 1D) (Speck and Freese, 1973). In these experiments (Figure 4), all cells started with a low growth rate, likely owing to the initial acetate present in the growth media. As cells divided, approximately half of the population switched on high levels of alsS expression within 7 to 10 hr (Figure 4, Figure 4—figure supplement 1, Videos 3–5). As growth progressed, these alsS+ cells exhibited a reduced growth rate, similar to that of the original culture. However, a distinct subpopulation with approximately 2.5-fold lower alsS expression emerged (alsS-), becoming greater than 70% of the population. These cells exhibited a faster division rate (Figure 4B, Figure 4—figure supplement 1) and faster elongation rate (Figure 4C, Figure 4—figure supplement 2).

Figure 4 with 3 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Video 3

Download asset

Video 4

Download asset

Video 5

Download asset

The fast growing alsS- cells that appeared late in pad growth experiments had a large growth advantage compared to the slow growing alsS+ cells (median elongation rates of 65 %/hr and 20 %/hr, respectively). In general, growth in the chemostatic Mother Machine using conditioned media is faster than on a pad with non-conditioned media containing acetate. However, the difference between alsS- and alsS+ cells is much smaller in the microfluidic condition (74 %/hr vs 63 %/hr for alsS- and alsS+). This finding is consistent with the established role of acetoin as a molecule secreted to counter the pH and anion producing toxic effect of secreted short chain fatty acids,including acetate (Xiao and Xu, 2007; Speck and Freese, 1973). In the pad environment, transient activation of genes for the production of the pH-protective acetoin in the alsS+ cells has the potential to produce a milder growth environment which may enable other cells to grow faster (Figure 4D). By contrast, in the mother-machine experiments (Figure 3), while cells switch in and out of the alsS metabolic state, the chemostatic nature of the device minimizes their ability to impact the growth rates of their neighbors.

To test the idea that alsS+ cells can enhance the growth of alsS- cells by influencing the extracellular environment, we seeded petri plates with equal numbers of cells from either wild-type or ∆alsS B. subtilis strains. The wildtype strain produced larger colonies than the deletion strain (Figure 4—figure supplement 3). However, ΔalsS colonies plated next to wildtype colonies exhibited a distinct growth advantage compared to the same colonies plated further away from the wildtype strain (Figure 4—figure supplement 3), indicating that alsS+ cells (in the wildtype colony) alter the growth environment to benefit ΔalsS cells. This may occur through detoxification by alsS+ cells (consistent with the role of alsS in the literature). However, our data do not rule out alternative scenarios in which alsS+ cells provide this benefit through a distinct mechanism, for example by the secretion of a shared metabolite or co-factor.

The natural metabolic niches in soil occupied by B. subtilis are not well understood, and likely heterogeneous. In general, growth of soil organisms is typically highest near deposits of organic materials which serve as carbon and nitrogen sources, including deposits of rotting fruits and vegetation. In many fruits and vegetables both organic acids (including malic acid) and sugars are very high, providing a natural setting where B. subtilis has access to its two preferred carbon sources simultaneously. B subtilis is commonly enriched (almost to levels of purity) in traditional fermentation of certain foods, including fermented soy-bean foods (eg natto) that are common in Asia (Kubo et al., 2011). In these beans sugar is present, and malic acid is also present in the root system of legumes and in soybean exudate, where it plays a role in iron homeostasis as a metal chelating agent (Tiffin and Brown, 1962).

The ‘acetate switch’ refers to the accumulation and reabsorption of acetate. It is a classic hallmark of bacterial growth in aerobic conditions, common to many bacteria including B. subtilis and E. coli (Wolfe, 2005). It allows for rapid initial growth until acetate levels and associated acidity reach toxic levels, at which point acetate is reabsorbed and replaced with pH-neutral overflow metabolites such as acetoin (Wolfe, 2005; Speck and Freese, 1973). Growth strategies in which a preferred toxic overflow metabolite is produced under aerobic conditions are also used by other organisms that expel and control different fermented toxic overflow metabolites, including ethanol fermentation by yeast (Otterstedt et al., 2004) and lactic acid in lactobacillus species (Borch and Molin, 1989). Interestingly, in the fermentation of ethanol by the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, ethanol is produced in dynamic bursts in which some cells switch in and out of fermentative metabolism. These bursts can be synchronized in chemostat growth (Tu et al., 2005), but also appear in batch culture (Silverman et al., 2010). In yeast, the single cell dynamics, mechanisms, and role of these bursts have not been fully elucidated. However, the presence of metabolically specialized subpopulations of cells in both eukaryotes and bacteria suggests that segregating different fermentative or respiratory pathways into individual cells may be a general strategy. It could function to avoid metabolic incompatibilities (Brandriss and Magasanik, 1981; Ackermann, 2015; Kumar et al., 2010), controlling cellular challenges such as reducing potential (Liu et al., 2017), or to optimize enzyme and substrate scaling, in which locally high concentrations of enzymes and substrates may be needed for efficient enzymatic conversion to occur (Nikel et al., 2014; Ackermann, 2015). Better understanding of the principles that govern segregation of metabolic activities will facilitate metabolic engineering and industrial fermentation approaches. This is especially true for commonly used industrial strains which naturally produce multiple fermentation products. For example, E. coli strains simultaneously produce five different fermentation products during mixed-acid fermentation (Clark, 1989).

The rapid release of toxic overflow products also has a role in the context of competition within a multi-species environment. In such environments, a quick buildup of toxic products can be advantageous to ward off competing species. In the case of human infectious disease, the buildup of byproducts such as lactic acid from normal microbiota limits infection by pathogens that are not lactic acid specialists (O'Hanlon et al., 2013). Likewise, in industrial fermenters and microbial food fermentation secreted overflow metabolites, including acetate and ethanol, limit contamination. Additionally, if a particular metabolic niche is transient, as in the case of acetate production in B. subtilis colony growth or batch culture, a strategy in which cells can switch in and out of metabolic states can be advantageous relative to an alternative scenario in which multiple strains are evolutionarily ‘locked’ into distinct specialist roles. This is especially true if the metabolic niche (e.g. acetate) is short-lived, because a ‘locked’ specialist strain would be at a disadvantage during periods of growth when acetate is absent.

In this study, we linked the presence of extracellular acetate with the activation of alsS in a subset of cells. In the case of competence and sucC, which are both controlled by the master regulator comK, quorum sensing plays a critical role in the activation of the competence program (Dubnau, 1991). Maximizing competence requires specific media conditions (Dubnau, 1982), raising the possibility that alongside quorum sensing peptides, secreted metabolic byproducts also play a role in this process.

Our results reveal that several metabolic processes may be affiliated with a given subpopulation. For instance, it is not clear at this point how sucC is related to acetate metabolism. One possible connection between sucC expression and acetate production might be that during co-consumption of glucose and malate, the TCA cycle may be overloaded with incoming material, causing accumulation of intermediates that can impact the glycolytic pathway, including acetate secretion. Another possibility is that sucC is used to regulate coenzyme-A levels at a time when a large amount of coenzyme-A is used and freed when pyruvate is converted to acetyl-coA and then acetate. Additionally, alongside the roles of the sucC and pta metabolic genes, arginine metabolism genes are also differentially regulated by competence, as seen in our results and in prior microarray experiments (Berka et al., 2002; Ogura et al., 2002), further complicating our understanding of the full physiological role of this subpopulation. Tools to systematically study metabolites in single cells would help to map the actual metabolic states of each subpopulation in a given condition and will allow us to address these questions.

Going beyond microbial systems, cell-cell heterogeneity can be advantageous as a ‘bet-hedging’ strategy both for microbial and cancer cells (Veening et al., 2008). In such cases, cell-cell heterogeneity enables the population as a whole to withstand unforeseen challenges, such as antibiotic or chemotherapeutic drugs (Sharma et al., 2010; Rotem et al., 2010), or metabolic shifts (Solopova et al., 2014). By contrast to simple bet-hedging, the emergence of alsS+ acetoin producing populations described here arises as a response to an anticipated challenge that is part of the growth progression in conditions favoring weak organic acid production. Thus, unlike in bet-hedging, metabolic state switching could provide a predictable benefit in a more deterministic dynamic environment.

Data are included in supplementary files.

1. 1. Ackermann M

   (2015) A functional perspective on phenotypic heterogeneity in microorganisms

   Nature Reviews Microbiology 13:497–508.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3491

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Afgan E
   2. Baker D
   3. van den Beek M
   4. Blankenberg D
   5. Bouvier D
   6. Čech M
   7. Chilton J
   8. Clements D
   9. Coraor N
   10. Eberhard C
   11. Grüning B
   12. Guerler A
   13. Hillman-Jackson J
   14. Von Kuster G
   15. Rasche E
   16. Soranzo N
   17. Turaga N
   18. Taylor J
   19. Nekrutenko A
   20. Goecks J

   (2016) The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2016 update

   Nucleic Acids Research 44:W3–W10.

   https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw343

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Bakkali M

   (2013) Could DNA uptake be a side effect of bacterial adhesion and twitching motility?

   Archives of Microbiology 195:279–289.

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-013-0870-1

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Berka RM
   2. Hahn J
   3. Albano M
   4. Draskovic I
   5. Persuh M
   6. Cui X
   7. Sloma A
   8. Widner W
   9. Dubnau D

   (2002) Microarray analysis of the Bacillus subtilis K-state: genome-wide expression changes dependent on ComK

   Molecular Microbiology 43:1331–1345.

   https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02833.x

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Borch E
   2. Molin G

   (1989) The aerobic growth and product formation of Lactobacillus, leuconostoc, Brochothrix, and Carnobacterium in batch cultures

   Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 30:81–88.

   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00256001

   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Brandriss MC
   2. Magasanik B

   (1981)

   Subcellular compartmentation in control of converging pathways for proline and arginine metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

   Journal of Bacteriology 145:1359–1364.

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Buescher JM
   2. Liebermeister W
   3. Jules M
   4. Uhr M
   5. Muntel J
   6. Botella E
   7. Hessling B
   8. Kleijn RJ
   9. Le Chat L
   10. Lecointe F
   11. Mäder U
   12. Nicolas P
   13. Piersma S
   14. Rügheimer F
   15. Becher D
   16. Bessieres P
   17. Bidnenko E
   18. Denham EL
   19. Dervyn E
   20. Devine KM
   21. Doherty G
   22. Drulhe S
   23. Felicori L
   24. Fogg MJ
   25. Goelzer A
   26. Hansen A
   27. Harwood CR
   28. Hecker M
   29. Hubner S
   30. Hultschig C
   31. Jarmer H
   32. Klipp E
   33. Leduc A
   34. Lewis P
   35. Molina F
   36. Noirot P
   37. Peres S
   38. Pigeonneau N
   39. Pohl S
   40. Rasmussen S
   41. Rinn B
   42. Schaffer M
   43. Schnidder J
   44. Schwikowski B
   45. Van Dijl JM
   46. Veiga P
   47. Walsh S
   48. Wilkinson AJ
   49. Stelling J
   50. Aymerich S
   51. Sauer U

   (2012) Global network reorganization during dynamic adaptations of Bacillus subtilis metabolism

   Science 335:1099–1103.

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206871

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Cağatay T
   2. Turcotte M
   3. Elowitz MB
   4. Garcia-Ojalvo J
   5. Süel GM

   (2009) Architecture-dependent noise discriminates functionally analogous differentiation circuits

   Cell 139:512–522.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.046

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Clark DP

   (1989) The fermentation pathways of Escherichia coli

   FEMS Microbiology Letters 63:223–234.

   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1989.tb03398.x

   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Davidson CJ
    2. Surette MG

    (2008) Individuality in bacteria

    Annual Review of Genetics 42:253–268.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091601

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Dubnau D
    2. Losick R

    (2006) Bistability in bacteria

    Molecular Microbiology 61:564–572.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05249.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Dubnau D

    (1982)

    Genetic transformation in Bacillus subtilis

    Bacillus Subtilis pp. 147–178.

    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Dubnau D

    (1991) The regulation of genetic competence in Bacillus subtilis

    Molecular Microbiology 5:11–18.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb01820.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Eldar A
    2. Chary VK
    3. Xenopoulos P
    4. Fontes ME
    5. Losón OC
    6. Dworkin J
    7. Piggot PJ
    8. Elowitz MB

    (2009) Partial penetrance facilitates developmental evolution in bacteria

    Nature 460:510–514.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08150

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Finkel SE
    2. Kolter R

    (2001) DNA as a nutrient: novel role for bacterial competence gene homologs

    Journal of Bacteriology 183:6288–6293.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.21.6288-6293.2001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Gefen O
    2. Balaban NQ

    (2009) The importance of being persistent: heterogeneity of bacterial populations under antibiotic stress

    FEMS Microbiology Reviews 33:704–717.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00156.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Gibson DG
    2. Young L
    3. Chuang RY
    4. Venter JC
    5. Hutchison CA
    6. Smith HO

    (2009) Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases

    Nature Methods 6:343–345.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1318

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Hahn J
    2. Kong L
    3. Dubnau D

    (1994) The regulation of competence transcription factor synthesis constitutes a critical control point in the regulation of competence in Bacillus subtilis

    Journal of Bacteriology 176:5753–5761.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.176.18.5753-5761.1994

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Hahn J
    2. Tanner AW
    3. Carabetta VJ
    4. Cristea IM
    5. Dubnau D

    (2015) ComGA-RelA interaction and persistence in the Bacillus subtilis K-state

    Molecular Microbiology 97:454–471.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13040

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Kleijn RJ
    2. Buescher JM
    3. Le Chat L
    4. Jules M
    5. Aymerich S
    6. Sauer U

    (2010) Metabolic fluxes during strong carbon catabolite repression by malate in Bacillus subtilis

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 285:1587–1596.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.061747

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Kubo Y
    2. Rooney AP
    3. Tsukakoshi Y
    4. Nakagawa R
    5. Hasegawa H
    6. Kimura K

    (2011) Phylogenetic analysis of Bacillus subtilis strains applicable to natto (fermented soybean) production

    Applied and Environmental Microbiology 77:6463–6469.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00448-11

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Kumar K
    2. Mella-Herrera RA
    3. Golden JW

    (2010) Cyanobacterial heterocysts

    Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 2:a000315.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a000315

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Leadbetter JR
    2. Schmidt TM
    3. Graber JR
    4. Breznak JA

    (1999) Acetogenesis from H2 plus CO2 by spirochetes from termite guts

    Science 283:686–689.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5402.686

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Levine JH
    2. Fontes ME
    3. Dworkin J
    4. Elowitz MB

    (2012) Pulsed feedback defers cellular differentiation

    PLoS Biology 10:e1001252.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001252

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Liu J
    2. Martinez-Corral R
    3. Prindle A
    4. Lee DD
    5. Larkin J
    6. Gabalda-Sagarra M
    7. Garcia-Ojalvo J
    8. Süel GM

    (2017) Coupling between distant biofilms and emergence of nutrient time-sharing

    Science 356:638–642.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah4204

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Locke JC
    2. Young JW
    3. Fontes M
    4. Hernández Jiménez MJ
    5. Elowitz MB

    (2011) Stochastic pulse regulation in bacterial stress response

    Science 334:366–369.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1208144

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Maamar H
    2. Raj A
    3. Dubnau D

    (2007) Noise in gene expression determines cell fate in Bacillus subtilis

    Science 317:526–529.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1140818

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Meyer FM
    2. Stülke J

    (2013) Malate metabolism in Bacillus subtilis: distinct roles for three classes of malate-oxidizing enzymes

    FEMS Microbiology Letters 339:17–22.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968.12041

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Monod J

    (1958)

    Recherches sur la croissance des cultures bactériennes

    Recherches sur la croissance des cultures bactériennes.

    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Nikel PI
    2. Silva-Rocha R
    3. Benedetti I
    4. de Lorenzo V

    (2014) The private life of environmental bacteria: pollutant biodegradation at the single cell level

    Environmental Microbiology 16:628–642.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12360

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Norman TM
    2. Lord ND
    3. Paulsson J
    4. Losick R

    (2013) Memory and modularity in cell-fate decision making

    Nature 503:481–486.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12804

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. O'Hanlon DE
    2. Moench TR
    3. Cone RA

    (2013) Vaginal pH and microbicidal lactic acid when lactobacilli dominate the microbiota

    PLoS One 8:e80074.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080074

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Ogura M
    2. Yamaguchi H
    3. Kobayashi K
    4. Ogasawara N
    5. Fujita Y
    6. Tanaka T

    (2002) Whole-genome analysis of genes regulated by the Bacillus subtilis competence transcription factor ComK

    Journal of Bacteriology 184:2344–2351.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.184.9.2344-2351.2002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Otterstedt K
    2. Larsson C
    3. Bill RM
    4. Ståhlberg A
    5. Boles E
    6. Hohmann S
    7. Gustafsson L

    (2004) Switching the mode of metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    EMBO Reports 5:532–537.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400132

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Papagianni M

    (2012) Recent advances in engineering the central carbon metabolism of industrially important bacteria

    Microbial Cell Factories 11:50.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-11-50

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Peyraud R
    2. Kiefer P
    3. Christen P
    4. Portais JC
    5. Vorholt JA

    (2012) Co-consumption of methanol and succinate by Methylobacterium extorquens AM1

    PLoS One 7:e48271.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048271

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Redfield RJ

    (1993) Genes for breakfast: the have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too of bacterial transformation

    Journal of Heredity 84:400–404.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111361

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Roe AJ
    2. McLaggan D
    3. Davidson I
    4. O'Byrne C
    5. Booth IR

    (1998)

    Perturbation of anion balance during inhibition of growth of Escherichia coli by weak acids

    Journal of Bacteriology 180:767–772.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Roe AJ
    2. O'Byrne C
    3. McLaggan D
    4. Booth IR

    (2002) Inhibition of Escherichia coli growth by acetic acid: a problem with methionine biosynthesis and homocysteine toxicity

    Microbiology 148:2215–2222.

    https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-148-7-2215

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Rosenthal AZ
    2. Kim Y
    3. Gralla JD

    (2008) Regulation of transcription by acetate in Escherichia coli: in vivo and in vitro comparisons

    Molecular Microbiology 68:907–917.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06186.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. Software

    1. Rosenthal AZ

    (2018) Schnitzcells_2018, version a05fa69

    GitHub.

    https://github.com/adamemnon123/Schnitzcells_2018
42. 1. Rotem E
    2. Loinger A
    3. Ronin I
    4. Levin-Reisman I
    5. Gabay C
    6. Shoresh N
    7. Biham O
    8. Balaban NQ

    (2010) Regulation of phenotypic variability by a threshold-based mechanism underlies bacterial persistence

    PNAS 107:12541–12546.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004333107

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Russell JB
    2. Diez-Gonzalez F

    (1997) The effects of fermentation acids on bacterial growth

    Advances in Microbial Physiology pp. 205–234.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2911(08)60017-X

    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Shahrezaei V
    2. Swain PS

    (2008) Analytical distributions for stochastic gene expression

    PNAS 105:17256–17261.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803850105

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Sharma SV
    2. Lee DY
    3. Li B
    4. Quinlan MP
    5. Takahashi F
    6. Maheswaran S
    7. Azizian N
    8. Zou L
    9. Fischbach MA
    10. Wong KK
    11. Brandstetter K
    12. Wittner B
    13. Ramaswamy S
    14. Classon M
    15. Settleman J
    16. Settleman J

    (2010) A chromatin-mediated reversible drug-tolerant state in cancer cell subpopulations

    Cell 141:69–80.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.027

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Silverman SJ
    2. Petti AA
    3. Slavov N
    4. Parsons L
    5. Briehof R
    6. Thiberge SY
    7. Zenklusen D
    8. Gandhi SJ
    9. Larson DR
    10. Singer RH
    11. Botstein D

    (2010) Metabolic cycling in single yeast cells from unsynchronized steady-state populations limited on glucose or phosphate

    PNAS 107:6946–6951.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002422107

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Solopova A
    2. van Gestel J
    3. Weissing FJ
    4. Bachmann H
    5. Teusink B
    6. Kok J
    7. Kuipers OP

    (2014) Bet-hedging during bacterial diauxic shift

    PNAS 111:7427–7432.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320063111

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Speck EL
    2. Freese E

    (1973) Control of metabolite secretion in Bacillus subtilis

    Journal of General Microbiology 78:261–275.

    https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-78-2-261

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Subramanian A
    2. Tamayo P
    3. Mootha VK
    4. Mukherjee S
    5. Ebert BL
    6. Gillette MA
    7. Paulovich A
    8. Pomeroy SL
    9. Golub TR
    10. Lander ES
    11. Mesirov JP

    (2005) Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles

    PNAS 102:15545–15550.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506580102

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Süel GM
    2. Garcia-Ojalvo J
    3. Liberman LM
    4. Elowitz MB

    (2006) An excitable gene regulatory circuit induces transient cellular differentiation

    Nature 440:545–550.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04588

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Süel GM
    2. Kulkarni RP
    3. Dworkin J
    4. Garcia-Ojalvo J
    5. Elowitz MB

    (2007) Tunability and noise dependence in differentiation dynamics

    Science 315:1716–1719.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137455

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Tiffin LO
    2. Brown JC

    (1962) Iron chelates in soybean exudate

    Science 135:311–313.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.135.3500.311

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Trapnell C
    2. Williams BA
    3. Pertea G
    4. Mortazavi A
    5. Kwan G
    6. van Baren MJ
    7. Salzberg SL
    8. Wold BJ
    9. Pachter L

    (2010) Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation

    Nature Biotechnology 28:511–515.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1621

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Tu BP
    2. Kudlicki A
    3. Rowicka M
    4. McKnight SL

    (2005) Logic of the yeast metabolic cycle: temporal compartmentalization of cellular processes

    Science 310:1152–1158.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1120499

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Veening JW
    2. Smits WK
    3. Kuipers OP

    (2008) Bistability, epigenetics, and bet-hedging in bacteria

    Annual Review of Microbiology 62:193–210.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.163002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Wang P
    2. Robert L
    3. Pelletier J
    4. Dang WL
    5. Taddei F
    6. Wright A
    7. Jun S

    (2010) Robust growth of Escherichia coli

    Current Biology 20:1099–1103.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.045

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Wolfe AJ

    (2005) The acetate switch

    Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 69:12–50.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.69.1.12-50.2005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Xiao Z
    2. Xu P

    (2007) Acetoin metabolism in bacteria

    Critical Reviews in Microbiology 33:127–140.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/10408410701364604

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Young JW
    2. Locke JC
    3. Altinok A
    4. Rosenfeld N
    5. Bacarian T
    6. Swain PS
    7. Mjolsness E
    8. Elowitz MB

    (2011) Measuring single-cell gene expression dynamics in bacteria using fluorescence time-lapse microscopy

    Nature Protocols 7:80–88.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2011.432

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Adam Z Rosenthal

   1. Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
   2. Department of Applied Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6936-3665

2. Yutao Qi

   1. Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
   2. Department of Applied Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Sahand Hormoz

   1. Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
   2. Department of Applied Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Jin Park

   1. Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
   2. Department of Applied Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States

   Contribution

   Methodology

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Sophia Hsin-Jung Li

   Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8972-6921

6. Michael B Elowitz

   1. Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
   2. Department of Applied Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
   3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Pasadena, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing

   For correspondence

   melowitz@caltech.edu

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1221-0967

• 10,913

  views

• 1,304

  downloads

• 85

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.