Cells regulate the import of amino acids, glucose, and other nutrients to fuel metabolism, sustain growth or maintain homeostasis. For the selective transport of amino acids across the plasma membrane (PM) and other cellular membranes, the human genome encodes more than 60 known amino acid transporters (AATs). Mutations in AATs cause severe defects of amino acid metabolism, and the deregulation of AATs is linked to a range of human pathologies, including neurodegenerative diseases, diabetes and cancer (Kandasamy et al., 2018; Smith, 1990; McCracken and Edinger, 2013; Zhang et al., 2017).

AATs belong to the family of solute carriers (SLCs) and form selective pores that change from an outward- to an inward-facing conformation and thereby transport their amino acid substrates across membranes. Hence, the addition of AATs to the PM or their selective removal by endocytosis determines quantity and quality of amino acid transport. In human cells, the molecular mechanisms leading to the selective endocytosis of AATs are largely unclear.

The mechanisms for the endocytic down-regulation of AATs are beginning to emerge in the budding yeast, S. cerevisiae. Yeast cells frequently experience acute fluctuations in amino acid availability (Broach, 2012) and can rapidly remodel their 21 PM-localized AATs to optimize the import of amino acids with regard to the quantity and quality of the nitrogen source available (Grenson et al., 1966; Grenson, 1966; André, 2018; Van Belle and André, 2001; Bianchi et al., 2019). The selective, ubiquitin-dependent endocytosis of AATs and other integral PM proteins frequently requires the HECT-type ubiquitin ligase Rsp5, the orthologue of human Nedd4 (Hein et al., 1995; Dupré et al., 2004; Belgareh-Touzé et al., 2008). To specifically recognize and ubiquitinate PM proteins, Rsp5 interacts with the α-arrestin proteins, a family of ubiquitin ligase adaptors (Nikko et al., 2008; Lin et al., 2008). The budding yeast genome encodes 14 α-arrestin proteins (arrestin-related trafficking adaptors, ARTs; Art1-10, Bul1-3 and Spo23), which function in a partially redundant manner (Becuwe et al., 2012a; MacGurn et al., 2012; Babst, 2020; O'Donnell and Schmidt, 2019; Nikko and Pelham, 2009). Six α-arrestins have been identified in humans (Alvarez, 2008). α-Arrestin proteins use PPxY (PY) motifs to interact directly with the three WW domains of Rsp5/Nedd4 (Becuwe et al., 2012a; Rauch and Martin-Serrano, 2011). How α-arrestins recognize their cargoes in general, and more specifically AATs, is only partially understood, but appears to involve their arrestin domains. These domains have large, disordered loop- and tail-like insertions that contribute to the function of ARTs (Baile et al., 2019).

The activity of α−arrestins is controlled by complex post-translational modifications (PTMs) involving (de-)ubiquitination and (de-)phosphorylation. In several cases, the binding of α−arrestins to Rsp5 results in their ubiquitination, which is required for function (Lin et al., 2008; Becuwe et al., 2012b; Hovsepian et al., 2017). In case of Art1, ubiquitination determines its localization (Lin et al., 2008). Additional ubiquitination of ARTs can target them for proteasomal degradation, which is counteracted by deubiquitinating enzymes (Ho et al., 2017). Several α−arrestins are activated by dephosphorylation events in response to nutrient availability or other cellular stresses (Becuwe et al., 2012a; O'Donnell et al., 2013; Alvaro et al., 2014; Becuwe et al., 2012b; Becuwe and Léon, 2014; Merhi and André, 2012). One example are high levels of amino acids, which activate the target of rapamycin complex 1 (TORC1). This leads to inhibition of the kinase Npr1 and thereby promotes the activity of Art1 (MacGurn et al., 2011). At the PM, Ppz phosphatases activate Art1 by dephosphorylation of its Npr1-dependent phosphorylation sites (Lee et al., 2019) and thereby stimulate ubiquitination and endocytosis of the Art1 cargoes Mup1 (methionine transporter), Can1 (arginine transporter), Tat2 (tyrosine and tryptophan transporter) and Lyp1 (lysine transporter) in response to substrate excess. Similarly, TORC1 signaling also promotes endocytosis of the general amino acid permease (Gap1) via the ARTs Bul1/2 (Merhi and André, 2012). It seems that nutrient-dependent TORC1 activation controls α−arrestin-mediated ubiquitin-dependent AAT endocytosis to adjust amino acid influx to metabolic needs.

Activated Art1 recognizes specific sorting signals in AATs. The flux of methionine through Mup1 or arginine through Can1 requires conformational changes into the inward-facing conformation, which probably dislodge a C-terminal plug that otherwise ‘seals’ the pore. At the same time, it exposes an N-terminal acidic patch that is recognized by activated Art1. Art1 interacts with this acidic patch and then orients Rsp5 to ubiquitinate nearby lysine residues (Guiney et al., 2016; Gournas et al., 2018; Busto et al., 2018; Ghaddar et al., 2014). Similar results have been obtained for the uracil transporter Fur4 (Keener and Babst, 2013). A further layer of complexity may be added by stimulus-induced phosphorylation of nutrient transporters (Marchal et al., 1998; Paiva et al., 2009), akin to the recognition of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) by β–arrestins in mammalian cells (Nikko et al., 2008; Nobles et al., 2011). Hence, a molecular basis of α−arrestin-dependent nutrient transporter endocytosis in response to excess nutrients is emerging. We refer to this process as substrate-induced endocytosis.

Yet, not only substrate transport can induce nutrient transporter endocytosis, but also nutrient limitation, acute starvation or rapamycin treatment (Crapeau et al., 2014; Hovsepian et al., 2017; Jones et al., 2012; Laidlaw et al., 2020; Lang et al., 2014; Müller et al., 2015; Schmidt et al., 1998; Yang et al., 2020). Starvation-induced endocytosis is part of a coordinated catabolic cascade. Together with proteasomal degradation and with macro- and micro-autophagy, it maintains amino acid homeostasis to allow entry into quiescence for cell survival during nutrient limitation. This catabolic cascade at the onset of starvation appears to be conserved in metazoans (Mejlvang et al., 2018; Edinger and Thompson, 2002a; Edinger and Thompson, 2002b; Vabulas and Hartl, 2005; Suraweera et al., 2012).

The molecular mechanisms of starvation-induced endocytosis are not clear. Hence, there is a significant knowledge gap in understanding how cells control nutrient transporter abundance upon amino acid and nitrogen scarcity. Here, we have characterized how amino acid abundance alters several nutrient transporters at the PM of the budding yeast S. cerevisiae. We find that TORC1 signaling and the general amino acid control (GAAC) pathway toggle Art1- or Art2-Rsp5 complex activities to induce endocytosis of the same set of four different AATs depending on amino acid availability. In these AATs, activated Art1- or Art2-Rsp5 complexes recognize distinct acidic sorting signals in the N-terminal (Art1 sorting signal) or C-terminal (Art2 sorting signal) regions to initiate Rsp5-dependent ubiquitination and subsequent endocytic down-regulation. Using such complementary α−arrestin switches in combination with distinct acidic sorting motifs in a single nutrient transporter could represent a more general mechanism to adjust transport across cellular membranes and thereby to meet metabolic demands.

We have made progress toward understanding how yeast cells selectively re-configure their repertoire of transporters at the PM in response to their nutritional status. The model in Figure 7C provides the conceptual framework for the mutually exclusive but complementary action of Art1-Rsp5 and Art2-Rsp5 ubiquitin ligase complexes for mediating the selective endocytosis of the methionine transporter Mup1 in response to changes in amino acid availability. Similar concepts may apply for the arginine transporter Can1, the lysine transporter Lyp1 and the tryptophan and tyrosine transporter Tat2. Based on our results and work from others, the endocytic down-regulation of these AATs can be described by the following set of rules: (1) Reciprocal (de-)activation of the α−arrestins Art1 and Art2. (2) Art1 or Art2 each recognize different acidic sorting signals on their client AATs that may require additional phosphorylation. (3) To do so, they employ basic patches in their extended arrestin C-domains and defined PY motifs to orient Rsp5 with high specificity toward proximal lysine residues. These rules satisfy the plasticity required for different α−arrestin and AAT interactions that drive exclusive or relatively broad substrate specificity depending on the metabolic context.

While both Art1 and Art2 lead to the degradation of AATs, they answer to distinct metabolic cues and are thus wired into distinct signaling pathways. Activation of Art1 by amino acid influx requires the coordinated interplay of TORC1 signaling to inactivate Npr1 (a kinase that negatively regulates Art1) and the action of phosphatases (Gournas et al., 2017; Lee et al., 2019; MacGurn et al., 2011; Tumolo et al., 2020). In response to amino acid limitation, TORC1 is no longer active. This will activate Npr1 to phosphorylate Art1, thereby inactivating it. At the same time, the lack of amino acids will activate the eIF2α kinase Gcn2. Gcn2 will phosphorylate eIF2α, which leads to the global down-regulation of translation, but enables specific translation of the transcription factor Gcn4 (Hinnebusch, 2005). Gcn4 then induces transcription of genes required for amino acid biosynthesis and of ART2, which causes an increase in Art2 protein levels and thus formation of Art2-Rsp5 complexes. This appears as primary means to activate Art2, since unscheduled increase in Art2 protein levels was sufficient to drive Art2-dependent nutrient transporter endocytosis already in cells growing under rich conditions. When amino acids become available again, the system can efficiently reset. TORC1 is reactivated resulting in Art1 reactivation. Conversely, Gcn4 will become instable and rapidly degraded by the ubiquitin proteasome system (Kornitzer et al., 1994; Meimoun et al., 2000; Irniger and Braus, 2003), and thus, the transcription of ART2 will cease. Interestingly, two de-ubiquitinating enzymes (Ubp2, Ubp15) de-ubiquitinate Art2 to influence its protein stability (Ho et al., 2017; Kee et al., 2006). Inhibiting their activity could provide additional control to repress Art2-dependent endocytosis in cells growing under rich conditions. Our screen identified also two de-ubiquinating enzymes, Doa4 and Ubp6 to be specifically required for starvation-induced endocytosis of Mup1. They could act directly on Art2 or Mup1 or help to maintain homeostasis of the ubiquitin pool during starvation.

Art2 is subject to extensive post-translational modification, including ubiquitination and phosphorylation. Database searches and our own proteomic experiments identified 68 phosphorylation sites and 20 ubiquitination sites in Art2 (data not shown) (Swaney et al., 2013; Albuquerque et al., 2008; Holt et al., 2009). How these modifications help to control the activity of Art2 remains a complex and open questions. Several arrestins were found to be phospho-inhibited in specific conditions (MacGurn et al., 2011; Becuwe et al., 2012b; O'Donnell et al., 2013; Hovsepian et al., 2017; Merhi and André, 2012; Llopis-Torregrosa et al., 2016), the common molecular basis of which is unknown. An exciting hypothesis would be that α-arrestin hyper-phosphorylation would add negative charges, and thereby prevent the recognition of acidic patches on transporters through electrostatic repulsion. Interestingly, our screen identified the pleitropic type 2A-related serine-threonine phosphatase Sit4 as a class one hit. Hence, Sit4 may be linked directly or indirectly to de-phosphorylation of Art2 and controlling its activity as reported recently for the Art2-dependent regulation of vitamin B1 transporters (Savocco et al., 2019).

Through the complementary activation of Art1 and Art2, cells can coordinate amino acid uptake through at least four high-affinity amino acid transporters with amino acid availability. The regulation of hexose transporters by glucose availability appears to be conceptually related, with distinct α−arrestin-Rsp5 complexes in charge of down-regulating the same transporters at various glucose concentrations with distinct mechanisms and kinetics (Hovsepian et al., 2017; Nikko and Pelham, 2009). In particular, the endocytosis of high-affinity hexose transporters during glucose starvation involves Art8, the closest paralogue of Art2, whose expression is also controlled by nutrient-regulated transcription (Hovsepian et al., 2017). Altogether, a picture emerges in which the transcriptional control of α−arrestin expression by nutrient-signaling pathways is critical to cope with nutrient depletion. This becomes part of the complex regulation of the ART-Rsp5 ubiquitin ligase network.

Our work also extends on previous findings regarding the determinants of α−arrestin/transporter interaction, indicating communalities between starvation- and substrate-induced endocytosis. Art1-Rsp5 and Art2-Rsp5 complexes both recognize specific acidic sequences on Mup1 (Figure 7C). Activated Art1-Rsp5 complexes recognize an acidic stretch in the N-terminus of Mup1 and Can1, close to the first transmembrane domain. The exposure of these N-terminal acidic patches is linked to substrate transport and conformational transitions in the transporters from the outward-open to the inward-open conformation, which in Mup1 also includes the so-called ‘C-plug’ (aa 520–543) (Busto et al., 2018; Guiney et al., 2016; Gournas et al., 2017). This conformational switch drives lateral re-localization of Mup1 and Can1 into a disperse PM compartment, where they are ubiquitinated by Art1-Rsp5 (Gournas et al., 2018; Busto et al., 2018). Art2 recognizes specifically an acidic patch in the C-terminal tail of Mup1, and thereby directs Rsp5 to ubiquitinate two juxtaposed C-terminal lysine residues. The C-plug is very close to the C-terminal acidic patch but is not part of the C-terminal Mup1 degron. We speculate that in the absence of nutrients AATs will spend more time in the outward open state with the C-Plug in place. In this state, activated Art2-Rsp5 complexes can still engage the C-terminal acidic patches. Hence, toggling Art1/Art2 activation in combination with accessibility of N- or C-terminal acidic sorting signals in AATs, in part regulated by their conformational state, must fall together to allow selective endocytosis.

An additional layer of regulation for endocytosis is provided by phosphorylation of AATs close to the acidic sorting signal. At the moment, we can only speculate about the kinase responsible for the phosphorylation of the C-terminal serine or threonine sites of Mup1. Perhaps, constitutive PM-associated kinases such as the yeast casein kinase one pair (Yck1/2) are involved, which are known to recognize rather acidic target sequences and to regulate endocytosis (Hicke et al., 1998; Paiva et al., 2009; Nikko et al., 2008; Marchal et al., 2002).

α-Arrestins lack the polar core in the arrestin domain that is used for cargo interactions in β-arrestins (Aubry et al., 2009; Polekhina et al., 2013). Instead Art1-Rsp5 and Art2-Rsp5 complexes each use a basic region in their arrestin C-domain to detect the acidic sorting signal in their client AATs. Studies on the interaction between GPCRs and β-arrestins revealed a multimodal network of flexible interactions: The N-domain of β-arrestin interacts with phosphorylated regions of the GPCR, their finger loop inserts into the transmembrane domain bundle of the GPCR and loops at the C-terminal edge of β-arrestin engage the membrane (Staus et al., 2020; Huang et al., 2020). Perhaps, a similar concept also holds true for α-arrestins. This is not unlikely given that their arrestin fold appears to be interspersed with disordered loops and very long, probably unstructured N- and/or C-terminal tails, some of which participate in cargo recognition or membrane interactions (Baile et al., 2019).

Despite the possible plasticity in substrate interactions, the selectivity of Art1-Rsp5 and Art2-Rsp5 complexes in ubiquitinating lysine residues proximal to the acidic patches of Mup1 is remarkable. Mup1 has 19 lysine residues at the cytoplasmic side: four at the N-terminal tail, six in the C-terminal tail and nine in the intracellular loops of the pore domain. Yet, Art1-Rsp5 complexes only ubiquitinate K27 and K28, whereas Art2-Rsp5 complexes only ubiquitinate K567 and K572. Even in the Hxt3-Mup1-C chimeric protein, Art2-Rsp5 complexes ubiquitinated only the lysine residues close to the acidic patch, despite six further lysine residues in the directly adjacent C-terminal tail of Hxt3. How is this possible? We speculate that these two α-arrestin-Rsp5 complexes orient the HECT domain of Rsp5 with high precision toward the lysine residues that are spatially close to the acidic patches. Once ubiquitinated, the AAT can engage the endocytic machinery to be removed from the PM.

In conclusion, Art1-Rsp5 complexes act rapidly to prevent the accumulation of excess amino acids, whereas the Art2-Rsp5 complexes help to degrade idle high-affinity amino acid transporters over longer periods of starvation to recycle their amino acid content. Starvation-induced endocytosis and the subsequent degradation of membrane proteins is required to maintain intracellular amino acid homeostasis (Müller et al., 2015; Jones et al., 2012). As such, it is well suited that Art2 activity and thus starvation-induced endocytosis of AATs is co-regulated and coordinated with de novo amino acid biosynthesis via the GAAC pathway. The down-regulation of AATs together with glucose transporters and further PM proteins could also free up domains at the PM that are populated by selective nutrient transporters (Spira et al., 2012; Grossmann et al., 2008) for transporters with broader substrate specificity such as the general amino acid permease Gap1 and the ammonium transporter Mep2, which are strongly up-regulated during starvation. Hence starvation-induced endocytosis could prepare cells – anticipatory – for non-selective nutrient acquisition, as soon as nutrients become available again. Consistent with this notion and a role of Art2 during starvation, yeast cells with mutations in ART2 show an altered adaptation to repetitive cycles of starvation (Wloch-Salamon et al., 2017). However, at the moment, it is not clear how these physiological defects are linked to the role of Art2 in starvation-induced endocytosis. Hence, despite the emergence of regulatory mechanisms, we are still far from understanding how each individual ART-Rsp5 complex controls nutrient acquisition and how this process translates into fine-tuning of metabolism, cell growth and survival. Even more unclear is how the activities of the entire ART-Rsp5 network are harmonized to achieve a coordinated cellular response to nutrient availability. Since a more global disruption of the ART-Rsp5 network causes proteotoxic stress with strong growth defects (Nikko and Pelham, 2009; Zhao et al., 2013; Hein et al., 1995), addressing these important questions will require new approaches.

Altogether, our results provide a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms that couple metabolic signaling and nutrient availability to nutrient transporter endocytosis in budding yeast. This might provide basic insights and principles for the vastly more complex regulation of the nutrient transporter repertoire in human cells under normal as well as pathophysiological conditions.

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

1. 1. Albuquerque CP
   2. Smolka MB
   3. Payne SH
   4. Bafna V
   5. Eng J
   6. Zhou H

   (2008) A multidimensional chromatography technology for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis

   Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 7:1389–1396.

   https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M700468-MCP200

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Alvarez CE

   (2008) On the origins of arrestin and rhodopsin

   BMC Evolutionary Biology 8:222.

   https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-222

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Alvaro CG
   2. O'Donnell AF
   3. Prosser DC
   4. Augustine AA
   5. Goldman A
   6. Brodsky JL
   7. Cyert MS
   8. Wendland B
   9. Thorner J

   (2014) Specific α-arrestins negatively regulate Saccharomyces cerevisiae pheromone response by down-modulating the G-protein-coupled receptor Ste2

   Molecular and Cellular Biology 34:2660–2681.

   https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00230-14

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. André B

   (2018) Tribute to Marcelle Grenson (1925–1996), A Pioneer in the Study of Amino Acid Transport in Yeast

   International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19:1207.

   https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19041207

   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Aubry L
   2. Guetta D
   3. Klein G

   (2009) The arrestin fold: variations on a theme

   Current Genomics 10:133–142.

   https://doi.org/10.2174/138920209787847014

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Babst M

   (2020) Regulation of nutrient transporters by metabolic and environmental stresses

   Current Opinion in Cell Biology 65:35–41.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2020.02.009

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Babu M
   2. Vlasblom J
   3. Pu S
   4. Guo X
   5. Graham C
   6. Bean BD
   7. Burston HE
   8. Vizeacoumar FJ
   9. Snider J
   10. Phanse S
   11. Fong V
   12. Tam YY
   13. Davey M
   14. Hnatshak O
   15. Bajaj N
   16. Chandran S
   17. Punna T
   18. Christopolous C
   19. Wong V
   20. Yu A
   21. Zhong G
   22. Li J
   23. Stagljar I
   24. Conibear E
   25. Wodak SJ
   26. Emili A
   27. Greenblatt JF

   (2012) Interaction landscape of membrane-protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

   Nature 489:585–589.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11354

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Baile MG
   2. Guiney EL
   3. Sanford EJ
   4. MacGurn JA
   5. Smolka MB
   6. Emr SD

   (2019) Activity of a ubiquitin ligase adaptor is regulated by disordered insertions in its arrestin domain

   Molecular Biology of the Cell 30:3057–3072.

   https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E19-08-0451

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Becuwe M
   2. Herrador A
   3. Haguenauer-Tsapis R
   4. Vincent O
   5. Léon S

   (2012a) Ubiquitin-Mediated regulation of endocytosis by proteins of the arrestin family

   Biochemistry Research International 2012:1–12.

   https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/242764

   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Becuwe M
    2. Vieira N
    3. Lara D
    4. Gomes-Rezende J
    5. Soares-Cunha C
    6. Casal M
    7. Haguenauer-Tsapis R
    8. Vincent O
    9. Paiva S
    10. Léon S

    (2012b) A molecular switch on an arrestin-like protein relays glucose signaling to transporter endocytosis

    The Journal of Cell Biology 196:247–259.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201109113

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Becuwe M
    2. Léon S

    (2014) Integrated control of transporter endocytosis and recycling by the arrestin-related protein Rod1 and the ubiquitin ligase Rsp5

    eLife 3:e03307.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03307

    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Belgareh-Touzé N
    2. Léon S
    3. Erpapazoglou Z
    4. Stawiecka-Mirota M
    5. Urban-Grimal D
    6. Haguenauer-Tsapis R

    (2008) Versatile role of the yeast ubiquitin ligase Rsp5p in intracellular trafficking

    Biochemical Society Transactions 36:791–796.

    https://doi.org/10.1042/BST0360791

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Bianchi F
    2. Van't Klooster JS
    3. Ruiz SJ
    4. Poolman B

    (2019)

    Regulation of amino acid transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews : MMBR 83:00024-19.

    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Breker M
    2. Gymrek M
    3. Moldavski O
    4. Schuldiner M

    (2014) LoQAtE--localization and quantitation ATlas of the yeast proteomE A new tool for multiparametric dissection of single-protein behavior in response to biological perturbations in yeast

    Nucleic Acids Research 42:D726–D730.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt933

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Broach JR

    (2012) Nutritional control of growth and development in yeast

    Genetics 192:73–105.

    https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.135731

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Busto JV
    2. Elting A
    3. Haase D
    4. Spira F
    5. Kuhlman J
    6. Schäfer-Herte M
    7. Wedlich-Söldner R

    (2018) Lateral plasma membrane compartmentalization links protein function and turnover

    The EMBO Journal 37:e99473.

    https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201899473

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Crapeau M
    2. Merhi A
    3. André B

    (2014) Stress conditions promote yeast Gap1 permease ubiquitylation and down-regulation via the arrestin-like bul and aly proteins

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 289:22103–22116.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.582320

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Dupré S
    2. Urban-Grimal D
    3. Haguenauer-Tsapis R

    (2004) Ubiquitin and endocytic internalization in yeast and animal cells

    Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research 1695:89–111.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2004.09.024

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Edinger AL
    2. Thompson CB

    (2002a) Akt maintains cell size and survival by increasing mTOR-dependent nutrient uptake

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 13:2276–2288.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.01-12-0584

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Edinger AL
    2. Thompson CB

    (2002b) Antigen-presenting cells control T cell proliferation by regulating amino acid availability

    PNAS 99:1107–1109.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.042707999

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Faserl K
    2. Chetwynd AJ
    3. Lynch I
    4. Thorn JA
    5. Lindner HH

    (2019) Corona isolation method matters: capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry based comparison of protein Corona compositions following On-Particle versus In-Solution or In-Gel digestion

    Nanomaterials 9:898.

    https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9060898

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Ghaddar K
    2. Merhi A
    3. Saliba E
    4. Krammer EM
    5. Prévost M
    6. André B

    (2014) Substrate-induced ubiquitylation and endocytosis of yeast amino acid permeases

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 34:4447–4463.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00699-14

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Gournas C
    2. Saliba E
    3. Krammer EM
    4. Barthelemy C
    5. Prévost M
    6. André B

    (2017) Transition of yeast Can1 transporter to the inward-facing state unveils an α-arrestin target sequence promoting its ubiquitylation and endocytosis

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 28:2819–2832.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e17-02-0104

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Gournas C
    2. Gkionis S
    3. Carquin M
    4. Twyffels L
    5. Tyteca D
    6. André B

    (2018) Conformation-dependent partitioning of yeast nutrient transporters into starvation-protective membrane domains

    PNAS 115:E3145–E3154.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719462115

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Grenson M

    (1966) Multiplicity of the amino acid permeases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. II. evidence for a specific lysine-transporting system

    Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta 127:339–346.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4165(66)90388-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Grenson M
    2. Mousset M
    3. Wiame JM
    4. Bechet J

    (1966) Multiplicity of the amino acid permeases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. evidence for a specific arginine-transporting system

    Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta 127:325–338.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4165(66)90387-4

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Grossmann G
    2. Malinsky J
    3. Stahlschmidt W
    4. Loibl M
    5. Weig-Meckl I
    6. Frommer WB
    7. Opekarová M
    8. Tanner W

    (2008) Plasma membrane microdomains regulate turnover of transport proteins in yeast

    Journal of Cell Biology 183:1075–1088.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200806035

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Guiney EL
    2. Klecker T
    3. Emr SD

    (2016) Identification of the endocytic sorting signal recognized by the Art1-Rsp5 ubiquitin ligase complex

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 27:4043–4054.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E16-08-0570

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Harris MA
    2. Clark J
    3. Ireland A
    4. Lomax J
    5. Ashburner M
    6. Foulger R
    7. Eilbeck K
    8. Lewis S
    9. Marshall B
    10. Mungall C
    11. Richter J
    12. Rubin GM
    13. Blake JA
    14. Bult C
    15. Dolan M
    16. Drabkin H
    17. Eppig JT
    18. Hill DP
    19. Ni L
    20. Ringwald M
    21. Balakrishnan R
    22. Cherry JM
    23. Christie KR
    24. Costanzo MC
    25. Dwight SS
    26. Engel S
    27. Fisk DG
    28. Hirschman JE
    29. Hong EL
    30. Nash RS
    31. Sethuraman A
    32. Theesfeld CL
    33. Botstein D
    34. Dolinski K
    35. Feierbach B
    36. Berardini T
    37. Mundodi S
    38. Rhee SY
    39. Apweiler R
    40. Barrell D
    41. Camon E
    42. Dimmer E
    43. Lee V
    44. Chisholm R
    45. Gaudet P
    46. Kibbe W
    47. Kishore R
    48. Schwarz EM
    49. Sternberg P
    50. Gwinn M
    51. Hannick L
    52. Wortman J
    53. Berriman M
    54. Wood V
    55. de la Cruz N
    56. Tonellato P
    57. Jaiswal P
    58. Seigfried T
    59. White R
    60. Gene Ontology Consortium

    (2004) The gene ontology (GO) database and informatics resource

    Nucleic Acids Research 32:D258–D261.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh036

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Hein C
    2. Springael JY
    3. Volland C
    4. Haguenauer-Tsapis R
    5. André B

    (1995) NPl1, an essential yeast gene involved in induced degradation of Gap1 and Fur4 permeases, encodes the Rsp5 ubiquitin-protein ligase

    Molecular Microbiology 18:77–87.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.mmi_18010077.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Henne WM
    2. Zhu L
    3. Balogi Z
    4. Stefan C
    5. Pleiss JA
    6. Emr SD

    (2015) Mdm1/Snx13 is a novel ER-endolysosomal interorganelle tethering protein

    Journal of Cell Biology 210:541–551.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201503088

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Hicke L
    2. Zanolari B
    3. Riezman H

    (1998) Cytoplasmic tail phosphorylation of the alpha-factor receptor is required for its ubiquitination and internalization

    Journal of Cell Biology 141:349–358.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.141.2.349

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Hinnebusch AG

    (1985) A hierarchy of trans-acting factors modulates translation of an activator of amino acid biosynthetic genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 5:2349–2360.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.5.9.2349

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Hinnebusch AG

    (2005) Translational regulation of GCN4 and the general amino acid control of yeast

    Annual Review of Microbiology 59:407–450.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.59.031805.133833

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Ho HC
    2. MacGurn JA
    3. Emr SD

    (2017) Deubiquitinating enzymes Ubp2 and Ubp15 regulate endocytosis by limiting ubiquitination and degradation of ARTs

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 28:1271–1283.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E17-01-0008

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Holt LJ
    2. Tuch BB
    3. Villén J
    4. Johnson AD
    5. Gygi SP
    6. Morgan DO

    (2009) Global analysis of Cdk1 substrate phosphorylation sites provides insights into evolution

    Science 325:1682–1686.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172867

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Hovsepian J
    2. Defenouillère Q
    3. Albanèse V
    4. Váchová L
    5. Garcia C
    6. Palková Z
    7. Léon S

    (2017) Multilevel regulation of an α-arrestin by glucose depletion controls hexose transporter endocytosis

    Journal of Cell Biology 216:1811–1831.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201610094

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Huang W
    2. Masureel M
    3. Qu Q
    4. Janetzko J
    5. Inoue A
    6. Kato HE
    7. Robertson MJ
    8. Nguyen KC
    9. Glenn JS
    10. Skiniotis G
    11. Kobilka BK

    (2020) Structure of the neurotensin receptor 1 in complex with β-arrestin 1

    Nature 579:303–308.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-1953-1

    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Huh WK
    2. Falvo JV
    3. Gerke LC
    4. Carroll AS
    5. Howson RW
    6. Weissman JS
    7. O'Shea EK

    (2003) Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast

    Nature 425:686–691.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02026

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Iesmantavicius V
    2. Weinert BT
    3. Choudhary C

    (2014) Convergence of ubiquitylation and phosphorylation signaling in rapamycin-treated yeast cells

    Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 13:1979–1992.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.O113.035683

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Irniger S
    2. Braus GH

    (2003) Controlling transcription by destruction: the regulation of yeast Gcn4p stability

    Current Genetics 44:8–18.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-003-0422-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Jones CB
    2. Ott EM
    3. Keener JM
    4. Curtiss M
    5. Sandrin V
    6. Babst M

    (2012) Regulation of membrane protein degradation by starvation-response pathways

    Traffic 13:468–482.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01314.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Kandasamy P
    2. Gyimesi G
    3. Kanai Y
    4. Hediger MA

    (2018) Amino acid transporters revisited: new views in health and disease

    Trends in Biochemical Sciences 43:752–789.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2018.05.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Kee Y
    2. Muñoz W
    3. Lyon N
    4. Huibregtse JM

    (2006) The deubiquitinating enzyme Ubp2 modulates Rsp5-dependent Lys63-linked polyubiquitin conjugates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 281:36724–36731.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M608756200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Keener JM
    2. Babst M

    (2013) Quality control and substrate-dependent downregulation of the nutrient transporter Fur4

    Traffic 14:412–427.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/tra.12039

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Kornitzer D
    2. Raboy B
    3. Kulka RG
    4. Fink GR

    (1994) Regulated degradation of the transcription factor Gcn4

    The EMBO Journal 13:6021–6030.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06948.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. Preprint

    1. Laidlaw KME
    2. Bisinski DD
    3. Shashkova S
    4. Paine KM
    5. Veillon MA
    6. Leake MC
    7. MacDonald C

    (2020) A glucose starvation response governs endocytic trafficking and eisosomal retention of surface cargoes

    bioRxiv.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.05.936187

    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Lang MJ
    2. Martinez-Marquez JY
    3. Prosser DC
    4. Ganser LR
    5. Buelto D
    6. Wendland B
    7. Duncan MC

    (2014) Glucose starvation inhibits autophagy via vacuolar hydrolysis and induces plasma membrane internalization by Down-regulating recycling

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 289:16736–16747.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.525782

    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Lee S
    2. Ho HC
    3. Tumolo JM
    4. Hsu PC
    5. MacGurn JA

    (2019) Methionine triggers Ppz-mediated dephosphorylation of Art1 to promote cargo-specific endocytosis

    Journal of Cell Biology 218:977–992.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201712144

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Lin CH
    2. MacGurn JA
    3. Chu T
    4. Stefan CJ
    5. Emr SD

    (2008) Arrestin-Related Ubiquitin-Ligase adaptors regulate endocytosis and protein turnover at the cell surface

    Cell 135:714–725.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.025

    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Llopis-Torregrosa V
    2. Ferri-Blázquez A
    3. Adam-Artigues A
    4. Deffontaines E
    5. van Heusden GP
    6. Yenush L

    (2016) Regulation of the yeast Hxt6 hexose transporter by the Rod1 α-Arrestin, the Snf1 protein kinase, and the Bmh2 14-3-3 protein

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 291:14973–14985.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M116.733923

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. MacGurn JA
    2. Hsu PC
    3. Smolka MB
    4. Emr SD

    (2011) TORC1 regulates endocytosis via Npr1-mediated phosphoinhibition of a ubiquitin ligase adaptor

    Cell 147:1104–1117.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.054

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. MacGurn JA
    2. Hsu PC
    3. Emr SD

    (2012) Ubiquitin and membrane protein turnover: from cradle to grave

    Annual Review of Biochemistry 81:231–259.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060210-093619

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Marchal C
    2. Haguenauer-Tsapis R
    3. Urban-Grimal D

    (1998) A PEST-Like sequence mediates phosphorylation and efficient ubiquitination of yeast uracil permease

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 18:314–321.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.18.1.314

    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Marchal C
    2. Haguenauer-Tsapis R
    3. Urban-Grimal D

    (2000) Casein kinase I-dependent phosphorylation within a PEST sequence and ubiquitination at nearby lysines signal endocytosis of yeast uracil permease

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 275:23608–23614.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M001735200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Marchal C
    2. Dupré S
    3. Urban-Grimal D

    (2002)

    Casein kinase I controls a late step in the endocytic trafficking of yeast uracil permease

    Journal of Cell Science 115:217–226.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. McClellan AJ
    2. Xia Y
    3. Deutschbauer AM
    4. Davis RW
    5. Gerstein M
    6. Frydman J

    (2007) Diverse cellular functions of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone uncovered using systems approaches

    Cell 131:121–135.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.036

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. McCracken AN
    2. Edinger AL

    (2013) Nutrient transporters: the achilles' heel of anabolism

    Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism 24:200–208.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2013.01.002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Meimoun A
    2. Holtzman T
    3. Weissman Z
    4. McBride HJ
    5. Stillman DJ
    6. Fink GR
    7. Kornitzer D

    (2000) Degradation of the transcription factor Gcn4 requires the kinase Pho85 and the SCF(CDC4) ubiquitin-ligase complex

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 11:915–927.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.11.3.915

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Mejlvang J
    2. Olsvik H
    3. Svenning S
    4. Bruun JA
    5. Abudu YP
    6. Larsen KB
    7. Brech A
    8. Hansen TE
    9. Brenne H
    10. Hansen T
    11. Stenmark H
    12. Johansen T

    (2018) Starvation induces rapid degradation of selective autophagy receptors by endosomal microautophagy

    Journal of Cell Biology 217:3640–3655.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201711002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Merhi A
    2. André B

    (2012) Internal amino acids promote Gap1 permease ubiquitylation via TORC1/Npr1/14-3-3-dependent control of the bul arrestin-like adaptors

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 32:4510–4522.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00463-12

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Mueller PP
    2. Harashima S
    3. Hinnebusch AG

    (1987) A segment of GCN4 mRNA containing the upstream AUG codons confers translational control upon a heterologous yeast transcript

    PNAS 84:2863–2867.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.84.9.2863

    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Mueller PP
    2. Hinnebusch AG

    (1986) Multiple upstream AUG codons mediate translational control of GCN4

    Cell 45:201–207.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(86)90384-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Müller M
    2. Schmidt O
    3. Angelova M
    4. Faserl K
    5. Weys S
    6. Kremser L
    7. Pfaffenwimmer T
    8. Dalik T
    9. Kraft C
    10. Trajanoski Z
    11. Lindner H
    12. Teis D

    (2015) The coordinated action of the MVB pathway and autophagy ensures cell survival during starvation

    eLife 4:e07736.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07736

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Nikko E
    2. Sullivan JA
    3. Pelham HR

    (2008) Arrestin-like proteins mediate ubiquitination and endocytosis of the yeast metal transporter Smf1

    EMBO Reports 9:1216–1221.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2008.199

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Nikko E
    2. Pelham HR

    (2009) Arrestin-mediated endocytosis of yeast plasma membrane transporters

    Traffic 10:1856–1867.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.00990.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Nobles KN
    2. Xiao K
    3. Ahn S
    4. Shukla AK
    5. Lam CM
    6. Rajagopal S
    7. Strachan RT
    8. Huang TY
    9. Bressler EA
    10. Hara MR
    11. Shenoy SK
    12. Gygi SP
    13. Lefkowitz RJ

    (2011) Distinct phosphorylation sites on the β(2)-adrenergic receptor establish a barcode that encodes differential functions of β-arrestin

    Science Signaling 4:ra51.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2001707

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. O'Donnell AF
    2. Huang L
    3. Thorner J
    4. Cyert MS

    (2013) A calcineurin-dependent switch controls the trafficking function of α-arrestin Aly1/Art6

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 288:24063–24080.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.478511

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. O'Donnell AF
    2. Schmidt MC

    (2019) AMPK-Mediated regulation of Alpha-Arrestins and protein trafficking

    International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20:515.

    https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030515

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Paiva S
    2. Vieira N
    3. Nondier I
    4. Haguenauer-Tsapis R
    5. Casal M
    6. Urban-Grimal D

    (2009) Glucose-induced ubiquitylation and endocytosis of the yeast Jen1 transporter: role of lysine 63-linked ubiquitin chains

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 284:19228–19236.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.008318

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Polekhina G
    2. Ascher DB
    3. Kok SF
    4. Beckham S
    5. Wilce M
    6. Waltham M

    (2013) Structure of the N-terminal domain of human thioredoxin-interacting protein

    Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography 69:333–344.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444912047099

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Prosser DC
    2. Whitworth K
    3. Wendland B

    (2010) Quantitative analysis of endocytosis with cytoplasmic pHluorin chimeras

    Traffic 11:1141–1150.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01088.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Rauch S
    2. Martin-Serrano J

    (2011) Multiple interactions between the ESCRT machinery and arrestin-related proteins: implications for PPXY-dependent budding

    Journal of Virology 85:3546–3556.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02045-10

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Robinson JS
    2. Klionsky DJ
    3. Banta LM
    4. Emr SD

    (1988) Protein sorting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: isolation of mutants defective in the delivery and processing of multiple vacuolar hydrolases

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 8:4936–4948.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.8.11.4936

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Rueden CT
    2. Schindelin J
    3. Hiner MC
    4. DeZonia BE
    5. Walter AE
    6. Arena ET
    7. Eliceiri KW

    (2017) ImageJ2: imagej for the next generation of scientific image data

    BMC Bioinformatics 18:529.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Saier MH
    2. Reddy VS
    3. Tsu BV
    4. Ahmed MS
    5. Li C
    6. Moreno-Hagelsieb G

    (2016) The transporter classification database (TCDB): recent advances

    Nucleic Acids Research 44:D372–D379.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1103

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Savocco J
    2. Nootens S
    3. Afokpa W
    4. Bausart M
    5. Chen X
    6. Villers J
    7. Renard HF
    8. Prévost M
    9. Wattiez R
    10. Morsomme P

    (2019) Yeast α-arrestin Art2 is the key regulator of ubiquitylation-dependent endocytosis of plasma membrane vitamin B1 transporters

    PLOS Biology 17:e3000512.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000512

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Schindelin J
    2. Arganda-Carreras I
    3. Frise E
    4. Kaynig V
    5. Longair M
    6. Pietzsch T
    7. Preibisch S
    8. Rueden C
    9. Saalfeld S
    10. Schmid B
    11. Tinevez JY
    12. White DJ
    13. Hartenstein V
    14. Eliceiri K
    15. Tomancak P
    16. Cardona A

    (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis

    Nature Methods 9:676–682.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Schmidt A
    2. Beck T
    3. Koller A
    4. Kunz J
    5. Hall MN

    (1998) The TOR nutrient signalling pathway phosphorylates NPR1 and inhibits turnover of the tryptophan permease

    The EMBO Journal 17:6924–6931.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.23.6924

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Schmidt O
    2. Weyer Y
    3. Fink MJ
    4. Müller M
    5. Weys S
    6. Bindreither M
    7. Teis D

    (2017) Regulation of Rab5 isoforms by transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms in yeast

    FEBS Letters 591:2803–2815.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.12785

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
81. 1. Schmidt O
    2. Weyer Y
    3. Baumann V
    4. Widerin MA
    5. Eising S
    6. Angelova M
    7. Schleiffer A
    8. Kremser L
    9. Lindner H
    10. Peter M
    11. Fröhlich F
    12. Teis D

    (2019) Endosome and Golgi-associated degradation (EGAD) of membrane proteins regulates sphingolipid metabolism

    The EMBO Journal 38:e101433.

    https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2018101433

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Schuldiner O
    2. Yanover C
    3. Benvenisty N

    (1998) Computer analysis of the entire budding yeast genome for putative targets of the GCN4 transcription factor

    Current Genetics 33:16–20.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s002940050303

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
83. 1. Shukla AK
    2. Westfield GH
    3. Xiao K
    4. Reis RI
    5. Huang LY
    6. Tripathi-Shukla P
    7. Qian J
    8. Li S
    9. Blanc A
    10. Oleskie AN
    11. Dosey AM
    12. Su M
    13. Liang CR
    14. Gu LL
    15. Shan JM
    16. Chen X
    17. Hanna R
    18. Choi M
    19. Yao XJ
    20. Klink BU
    21. Kahsai AW
    22. Sidhu SS
    23. Koide S
    24. Penczek PA
    25. Kossiakoff AA
    26. Woods VL
    27. Kobilka BK
    28. Skiniotis G
    29. Lefkowitz RJ

    (2014) Visualization of arrestin recruitment by a G-protein-coupled receptor

    Nature 512:218–222.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13430

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
84. 1. Sikorski RS
    2. Hieter P

    (1989)

     A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Genetics 122:19–27.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Smith RJ

    (1990) Glutamine metabolism and its physiologic importance

    Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 14:40S–44.

    https://doi.org/10.1177/014860719001400402

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
86. 1. Spira F
    2. Mueller NS
    3. Beck G
    4. von Olshausen P
    5. Beig J
    6. Wedlich-Söldner R

    (2012) Patchwork organization of the yeast plasma membrane into numerous coexisting domains

    Nature Cell Biology 14:640–648.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2487

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
87. 1. Staus DP
    2. Hu H
    3. Robertson MJ
    4. Kleinhenz ALW
    5. Wingler LM
    6. Capel WD
    7. Latorraca NR
    8. Lefkowitz RJ
    9. Skiniotis G

    (2020) Structure of the M2 muscarinic receptor-β-arrestin complex in a lipid nanodisc

    Nature 579:297–302.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-1954-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
88. 1. Suraweera A
    2. Münch C
    3. Hanssum A
    4. Bertolotti A

    (2012) Failure of amino acid homeostasis causes cell death following proteasome inhibition

    Molecular Cell 48:242–253.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.08.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
89. 1. Swaney DL
    2. Beltrao P
    3. Starita L
    4. Guo A
    5. Rush J
    6. Fields S
    7. Krogan NJ
    8. Villén J

    (2013) Global analysis of phosphorylation and ubiquitylation cross-talk in protein degradation

    Nature Methods 10:676–682.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2519

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
90. 1. Tumolo JM
    2. Hepowit NL
    3. Joshi SS
    4. MacGurn JA

    (2020) A Snf1-related nutrient-responsive kinase antagonizes endocytosis in yeast

    PLOS Genetics 16:e1008677.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008677

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
91. 1. Vabulas RM
    2. Hartl FU

    (2005) Protein synthesis upon acute nutrient restriction relies on proteasome function

    Science 310:1960–1963.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121925

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
92. 1. Van Belle D
    2. André B

    (2001) A genomic view of yeast membrane transporters

    Current Opinion in Cell Biology 13:389–398.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00226-X

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
93. 1. Venters BJ
    2. Wachi S
    3. Mavrich TN
    4. Andersen BE
    5. Jena P
    6. Sinnamon AJ
    7. Jain P
    8. Rolleri NS
    9. Jiang C
    10. Hemeryck-Walsh C
    11. Pugh BF

    (2011) A comprehensive genomic binding map of gene and chromatin regulatory proteins in Saccharomyces

    Molecular Cell 41:480–492.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.01.015

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
94. 1. Wloch-Salamon DM
    2. Tomala K
    3. Aggeli D
    4. Dunn B

    (2017) Adaptive roles of SSY1 and SIR3 during cycles of growth and starvation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Populations Enriched for Quiescent or Nonquiescent Cells

    G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 7:1899–1911.

    https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.117.041749

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
95. 1. Yang X
    2. Zhang W
    3. Wen X
    4. Bulinski PJ
    5. Chomchai DA
    6. Arines FM
    7. Liu Y-Y
    8. Sprenger S
    9. Teis D
    10. Klionsky DJ
    11. Li M

    (2020) TORC1 regulates vacuole membrane composition through ubiquitin- and ESCRT-dependent microautophagy

    Journal of Cell Biology 219:e201902127.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201902127

    • Google Scholar
96. 1. Zhang J
    2. Pavlova NN
    3. Thompson CB

    (2017) Cancer cell metabolism: the essential role of the nonessential amino acid, glutamine

    The EMBO Journal 36:1302–1315.

    https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201696151

    • Google Scholar
97. 1. Zhao Y
    2. Macgurn JA
    3. Liu M
    4. Emr S

    (2013) The ART-Rsp5 ubiquitin ligase network comprises a plasma membrane quality control system that protects yeast cells from proteotoxic stress

    eLife 2:e00459.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00459

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
98. 1. Zimmermann L
    2. Stephens A
    3. Nam SZ
    4. Rau D
    5. Kübler J
    6. Lozajic M
    7. Gabler F
    8. Söding J
    9. Lupas AN
    10. Alva V

    (2018) A completely reimplemented MPI bioinformatics toolkit with a new HHpred server at its core

    Journal of Molecular Biology 430:2237–2243.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.007

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Acceptance summary:

The manuscript provides a deep and mechanistic understanding of a new response strategy to starvation in yeast. Specifically, it demonstrates that Art2 has a role in selective endocytosis of several plasma membrane proteins, including amino acid transporters, during amino acid starvation. Importantly it uncovers the signals on the substrate and adaptor that are both necessary and sufficient for this process. We are excited to have it be published in eLife.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Complementary α-arrestin-ubiquitin ligase complexes control nutrient transporter endocytosis in response to amino acids" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by three peer reviewers, one of whom is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors, and the evaluation has been overseen by Suzanne Pfeffer as the Senior Editor. The reviewers have opted to remain anonymous.

The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.

We would like to draw your attention to changes in our revision policy that we have made in response to COVID-19 (https://elifesciences.org/articles/57162). Specifically, we are asking editors to accept without delay manuscripts, like yours, that they judge can stand as eLife papers without additional data, even if they feel that they would make the manuscript stronger. Thus the revisions requested below only address clarity and presentation.

Editorial summary and revision requests:

The manuscript by Ivashov et al. explores the molecular mechanisms leading to the selective endocytosis of amino acid transporters (AATs) in the baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae during starvation. It was known that AATs on the membrane need to be ubiquitinated by Rsp5 through adaptors called ARTs. While some insights into the substrate induced endocytosis (activated by enhanced substrate flux) have already emerged, it is unclear how endocytosis of AATs occurs during acute starvation. This manuscript is the first to characterize the signaling and regulatory pathway guiding endocytosis of an AAT during starvation and discovers a specific role for Art2 as well as the signals on the substrate and adaptor that are both necessary and sufficient for this process. This paper is deep and mechanistic and uncovers a new regulatory cycle in a novel path of AAT starvation-dependent endocytosis and as such would be valuable to the cell biology community. Please answer the below requests prior to acceptance:

Experimental requests:

1) Is the transcriptional regulation enough to explain the differential requirement on ARTs for substrate induced vs. starvation induced endocytosis? I.e., if Art1 is expressed under the ART2 promoter in a ∆art2 during starvation – could it rescue the endocytosis of Mup1? This is not essential for publication, but would be a nice and easy experiment to do.

2) Figures 3B, 4A – how many times were they repeated? Please quantify the changes with SDs. This is true for all western blots whose claim is for a quantitative phenotype (increase or decrease in expression or in free GFP). Specifically, in Figure 4F quantification relative to the PGK control may show a similar increase in GCN4^C…In addition, "WB analysis of total cell lysates indicated quantitative band shifts of Art1…". However, no quantification is provided. Please add quantification.

3) The authors use Mup1 (as one model substrate) and its downregulation as a criterion for adaptation to starvation. Does Art2 deletion or the mutation in Art2 (Figure 7B) cause any growth defect or problems with adaptation to starvation? This would be expected if downregulation via Art2 is a long-term adaptation response.

4) The authors suggest that Art1 and Art2 act on different patches and provide convincing data along this line. Is it possible to generate chimeric constructs of Art1 and Art2 to swap their specificity? Since this may not work given that Art2 has so many modification sites, this is not essential for resubmission.

Textual/Figure suggestions:

1) In the first Results section (subsection “Amino acid availability induces selective endocytosis of nutrient transporters”, first paragraph) when discussing the C' GFP tagging library of yeast please cite the manuscript that generated that library (PMID: 14562095) and not only in the Materials and methods.

2) The first part of the paper where C' GFP proteins were screened for expression is seems unrelated to the rest of the paper and not necessary for the future experiments. If the authors were interested specifically in AATs why did they not track all yeast AATs? It seems that some of them can be nicely visualized when tagged at their N' (such as Vba5, Thi72) or might need retagging and not to be taken from the library. Having only 7AATs to work with reduces the systematic nature of this study. Moreover, in the end they really only skim through the 4 well studied AATs (Mup1, Can, Lyp1 and Tat2) and really only focus on Mup1. Hence the Introduction is a bit misleading discussing not Mup1 but all AATs and making the first part of the paper quite unnecessary. Please reconsider writing the paper in a way that is more focused on Mup1 as a model and removing the above section.

3) Subsection “A genome-wide screen identifies regulators of starvation-induced endocytosis of AATs”, first paragraph: please change FACS to Flow Cytometry there and all places thereafter including Figure 2.

4) Subsection “A genome-wide screen identifies regulators of starvation-induced endocytosis of AATs”, second paragraph: typo.

5) Discussion, second paragraph: define UPS upon first use.

6) Figure 1A typo – should be methionine.

7) Figure 1B – "Ammonium Transporter" should be in color.

8) Figure 4B – what is n>x means – please write how many times exactly was it repeated.

9) Figure 6E has a very important piece of information, in that the authors show that the C-terminal segment of Mup1 can be transplanted to Hxt3. Please add the response of the un-modified Hxt3 in the same panel (and not in Figure 6—figure supplement 2A) to have the direct comparison.

10) The FACS-based screen of Mup1 traffic presented here is really quite nice, and provides a lot of information on proteins that regulate its endocytosis and vacuolar delivery. However, the finding that Art2 regulates stress-dependent endocytosis of a variety of transporters at the PM is neither surprising nor novel: Nikko and Pelham, 2009, published a key paper that positioned Art2 as a regulator of stress-dependent internalization of a wide variety of cargos. The stressor in was cycloheximide rather than starvation, suggesting a more general regulation of substrate-independent endocytosis. The Nikko and Pelham paper needs to be cited more prominently through this study. Its findings may not have the level of mechanistic detail presented here, but they do strongly parallel a number of key points.

11) The authors state that "low levels of methionine in the growth medium did not efficiently trigger its endocytosis." Supplementary Figure 1B complicates this interpretation, as there is clearly less Mup1 overall in 0.02 ug/ml Met compared to the no Met control. This decrease suggests that the protein indeed is being internalized, albeit at a slower rate. Flux from PM to vacuole could be slow enough that GFP fluorescence does not accumulate in the vacuole. Such a phenomenon was observed for Ptr2-GFP in Apel et al. (Mol Biol Cell 28: 2434-48). Please discuss this further in the manuscript.

12) Subsection “A genome-wide screen identifies regulators of starvation-induced endocytosis of AATs”, second paragraph: identify pep4∆ as the sole "class 4" mutant, where Mup1-pHluorin accumulates in the vacuole, but remains fluorescent. This is unexpected, since Prosser et al., 2010, showed that Ste3-pHluorin is efficiently transported to the vacuole in pep4∆prb1∆ prc1∆ cells, where fluorescence is still fully quenched. How might this discrepancy be explained?

13) The first paragraph of the subsection “Up-regulation of Art2 by the GAAC pathway drives starvation-induced endocytosis of Mup1” suggests that the observed bandshift is due to Npr1-dependent phosphorylation. This is an over-interpretation, since no direct evidence of Npr1 involvement is shown. Moreover, since Art1 is both phosphorylated and ubiquitinated, the band shift may not be due to phosphorylation at all. This should be more carefully interpreted, or more thoroughly investigated.

14) The first paragraph of the subsection “Up-regulation of Art2 by the GAAC pathway drives starvation-induced endocytosis of Mup1” states that levels of Art2-HTF were "comparably" low under rich conditions. What is this compared to? The blot in Figure 4A shows an increase in Art2 levels upon starvation, but levels of Art1 appear to decrease. Please clarify.

15) Subsection “Art2 directs Rsp5-dependent ubiquitination of C-terminal lysine residues in Mup1”, second paragraph: regarding the arrestin fold-localized PY motif, the authors state that it is required for starvation-induced endocytosis. This is an overstatement, since Figure 5E clearly shows Mup1 internalization when this PY motif is mutated, even though the amount of protein internalized is reduced. Please rephrase.

16) The first paragraph of the subsection “Up-regulation of Art2 by the GAAC pathway drives starvation-induced endocytosis of Mup1” states that Art1/2 regulate AAT endocytosis in a mutually exclusive manner, but this is not true for Tat2 based on Nikko and Pelham, 2008, where either is sufficient for Trp-induced internalization. Please discuss this.

17) Subsection “The C-terminal acidic sorting signal of Mup1 is sufficient for Art2-dependent starvation-induced endocytosis”, end of first paragraph: the callout for Supplementary Figure 6B should be for Figure 6—figure supplement 2D.

Experimental requests:

1) Is the transcriptional regulation enough to explain the differential requirement on ARTs for substrate induced vs. starvation induced endocytosis? I.e., if Art1 is expressed under the ART2 promoter in a ∆art2 during starvation – could it rescue the endocytosis of Mup1? This is not essential for publication, but would be a nice and easy experiment to do.

Thank you for this suggestion. We have replaced the ART1 promoter region with the ART2 promoter region. The ART2 promoter region also induced the expression of Art1 during starvation (Figure 4—figure supplement 2A). Yet, the upregulation of Art1 protein levels driven by the ART2 promoter failed to restore starvation-induced endocytosis of Mup1-GFP in art2∆ cells (Figure 4—figure supplement 2B), whereas the same construct was sufficient for substrate-induced endocytosis of Mup1-GFP in art1∆ cells (Figure 4—figure supplement 2B).

These results are in agreement with our model of the switch from Art1-dependent to Art2-dependent amino acid transporter endocytosis during starvation. The results further show that the simple upregulation of Art1 with the ART2 promoter is not sufficient to initiate Mup1 endocytosis in response to starvation. Rather, the combination of Art1 and Art2 protein levels, the specific properties of Art1 and Art2 (e.g. their post-translational regulation, basic patches, etc…) as well as the exposure of the N- and C-terminal acidic patches on Mup1 define the substrate selectivity of endocytosis in response to nutrient availability.

2) Figures 3B, 4A – how many times were they repeated? Please quantify the changes with SDs. This is true for all western blots whose claim is for a quantitative phenotype (increase or decrease in expression or in free GFP). Specifically, in Figure 4F quantification relative to the PGK control may show a similar increase in GCN4^C…In addition, "WB analysis of total cell lysates indicated quantitative band shifts of Art1…". However, no quantification is provided. Please add quantification.

We now provide quantification for the blots in Figure 3B (in Figure 3—figure supplement 1A), Figure 4 (in Figure 4—figure supplement 1B, C, F, G) and in Figure 6—figure supplement 2 (in Figure 6—figure supplement 2C, E). The results of the WB quantifications (including SD) confirm our original results. For the quantification, all blots have been repeated at least 3 times.

We agree with reviewers that the WB in Figure 4F was not ideally loaded to allow quantification. Therefore, we have repeated the experiment. The new result (Figure 4F), quantified in Figure 4—figure supplement 1G, confirms that constitutive Gcn4 translation (in GCN4^C mutants) upregulates Art2 already under rich growth conditions and that there is no further upregulation of Art2 in GCN4^C mutants during starvation.

3) The authors use Mup1 (as one model substrate) and its downregulation as a criterion for adaptation to starvation. Does Art2 deletion or the mutation in Art2 (Figure 7B) cause any growth defect or problems with adaptation to starvation? This would be expected if downregulation via Art2 is a long-term adaptation response.

Unicellular organisms must efficiently and robustly adjust cell growth and survival to nutrient availability. We have shown earlier that starvation-induced endocytosis and the selective lysosomal membrane protein degradation through the MVB pathway co-operates with autophagy to ensure cell survival during starvation (Müller et al., 2015).

In our current paper, we have built on this observation and have identified how selectivity of endocytosis is achieved to degrade a defined subset of plasma membrane (PM) proteins during starvation. The genome of S. cerevisiae encodes 14 different ART proteins that collectively function in the selective degradation of membrane proteins in response to different growth and stress conditions. We demonstrate that Art2 is required to selectively target 5 different substrates (four amino acid transporters and Ina1) for starvation-induced endocytosis and degradation, out of at least 15 different membrane proteins. Other membrane proteins most likely will depend on other ARTs and will still be degraded in art2∆ mutants, e.g. we demonstrate that starvation-induced endocytosis of Hxt3 requires Art4.

Hence, strong effects on starvation survival (similar to ESCRT mutants that block the lysosomal degradation of all membrane proteins – see Müller et al., 2015) could be expected by simultaneous deletion of multiple ART proteins or of the ubiquitin ligase Rsp5. However, RSP5 is an essential gene, and mutants in which multiple ART genes are deleted display severe growth defects with loss of plasma membrane integrity due to proteotoxic stress (Nikko and Pelham, 2009; Zhao et al., 2013). The contribution of individual α-arrestins to survival might be relatively minor.

With this in mind, we have very carefully examined the growth and survival properties of art2∆ mutants and compared them to isogenic WT cells, as well as to autophagy mutants (atg8∆) and atg8∆ art2∆ double mutants. Indeed, the effects of art2∆ mutants on cell growth are moderate. Under rich growth conditions and in logarithmic growth phase, Art2 mutants grew slightly faster when compared to WT cells (Author response image 1A), whereas the cell diameter was similar (Author response image 1B).

Author response image 1

Download asset Open asset

When these cells were exposed to amino acid and nitrogen starvation for up to 21 days, art2∆ mutants entered cell cycle arrest similar to WT cells (we scored the budding index after 24 hours and it was similar, data not shown) and displayed no significant differences in terms of cell diameter, survival (spot assays) or PM integrity / viability (measured by propidium iodide permeability) (Author response image 1B-D). Yet, when art2∆ cells were refed with fresh medium, after starving for 15 days or 21 days, they resumed growth slightly slower compared to WT cells (Author response image 1E). As control we used autophagy mutants (atg8∆) that displayed defects in cell survival during starvation (Author response image 1C, D) and failed to resume growth after starvation. We did not observe synthetic survival deficits of art2∆ cells with autophagy mutants (atg8∆) during prolonged starvation (Author response image 1C, D).

In conclusion, ART2-deficient cells appear to display mild deficits in adjusting cell growth both under rich conditions and while resuming growth after starvation. A precise mechanistic understanding of how Art2 in concert with all other branches of the ART-Rsp5 ubiquitin ligase network contributes specifically to cell physiology under different growth conditions would require additional experiments (e.g. strain / nutrient competition experiments, metabolomics). We believe that these complex physiological experiments would go beyond the scope of the current study, which focuses on the mechanism for selective starvation-induced endocytosis. Therefore, at the moment we think it would be premature to include these new experiments in the paper.

Consistent with the results presented here, another recent study (Wloch-Salamon DM et al., G3 (Genes, Genomes, Genetics), 2017, PMID: 28450371) found that over many repeated growth-starvation cycles (equivalent to 300 generations) mutations in Art2 (Ecm21) and Rsp5 affected survival in limiting nutrients. These findings also point to a physiological function of Art2 during starvation. However, it is not clear how these physiological defects are linked to the role of Art2 in starvation induced endocytosis and we now discuss this and cite the study by Wloch-Salamon et al., 2017.

4) The authors suggest that Art1 and Art2 act on different patches and provide convincing data along this line. Is it possible to generate chimeric constructs of Art1 and Art2 to swap their specificity? Since this may not work given that Art2 has so many modification sites, this is not essential for resubmission.

This would be indeed a great experiment. At the moment, however, this experiment has little chance of success, due to the above mentioned massive post-translational modifications of both proteins and the seemingly inverse activation / inactivation of Art1 and Art2.

Moreover, recent work from the Emr lab suggests that the activity of the α-arrestins is regulated by disordered loops in their arrestin domains (Baile et al., 2019). The disordered loop insertion in Art2 appears to be more extensive compared to Art1 (see schematic in Author response image 2). In Art2, a clear signature for an arrestin-N domain cannot be detected and the arrestin-C domain is extended to more than twice the length of the arrestin-C pfam model (Baile et al., 2019). In addition, these disordered loops are in the different positions in the arrestin N- and C- domains of Art1 and Art2, respectively, and therefore render precise domain swap experiments almost impossible without additional structural information.

Author response image 2

Download asset Open asset

Textual/Figure suggestions:

1) In the first Results section (subsection “Amino acid availability induces selective endocytosis of nutrient transporters”, first paragraph) when discussing the C' GFP tagging library of yeast please cite the manuscript that generated that library (PMID: 14562095) and not only in the Materials and methods.

Thank you for pointing this out. We have now included the corresponding reference in the Results section of the manuscript.

2) The first part of the paper where C' GFP proteins were screened for expression is seems unrelated to the rest of the paper and not necessary for the future experiments. If the authors were interested specifically in AATs why did they not track all yeast AATs? It seems that some of them can be nicely visualized when tagged at their N' (such as Vba5, Thi72) or might need retagging and not to be taken from the library. Having only 7AATs to work with reduces the systematic nature of this study. Moreover, in the end they really only skim through the 4 well studied AATs (Mup1, Can, Lyp1 and Tat2) and really only focus on Mup1. Hence the Introduction is a bit misleading discussing not Mup1 but all AATs and making the first part of the paper quite unnecessary. Please reconsider writing the paper in a way that is more focused on Mup1 as a model and removing the above section.

We agree with the reviewers that the analysis presented in Figure 1 is neither systematic nor comprehensive and we have toned down the results and adapted the text of Figure 1 accordingly.

Yet, we think that the results of Figure 1 are important (i) because they demonstrate in an unprecedented way the scale and the selectivity of starvation-induced endocytosis towards certain cargoes and (ii) they are important to delineate the specificity of Art2 for a subset of cargoes including Ina1 (new result Figure 3—figure supplement 1C), and four different amino acid transporters (AAT), but not for all membrane proteins that undergo starvation-induced endocytosis (e.g. the glucose transporters) (Figure 3—figure supplement 1D). Therefore, we prefer to keep the data of Figure 1 in the paper.

We have now also identified a further membrane protein (Ina1), which undergoes Art2-dependent starvation-induced endocytosis (Supplementary file 1; Figure 3—figure supplement 1C). Ina1 is a protein of unknown function with three predicted transmembrane domains and a cytoplasmic C-terminus and not related to AATs, suggesting that the action of Art2 during starvation is not limited to AATs. The Ina1 sequence also features a putative acidic patch (included in Figure 6D) in its C-terminus, and its starvation-induced endocytosis is impaired in the basic patch mutant Art2 K664D,R665D,R666D,K667D (Figure 7—figure supplement 1B).

In Figure 1, we have screened a library containing 149 putative PM proteins that were C-terminally GFP-tagged at their native chromosomal locus. According to a recent and comprehensive review by Bert Poolman and colleagues (Bianchi et al., 2019), the S. cerevisiae S288C genome encodes 21 AATs that have been reported to localize to the plasma membrane (we have corrected the number accordingly in the Introduction). Our library contained 16 of these 21 AATs, and thus covers 76% of all AATs that are reported to localize to the PM and lacks five (Agp3, Alp1, Hip1, Put4, and Vba5) (see modified Supplementary file 1).

Of the 16 AATs represented in our library, we detect under rich growth conditions (YNB medium, genetic background BY4741) eight different AATs (Mup1, Can1, Tat2, Lyp1, Dip5, Gnp1, Bap2 and Tat1; see modified Supplementary file 1) at the PM. In the original version of the manuscript we have miscounted seven AATs. We apologize for this mistake and have corrected the numbers accordingly. A ninth AAT, Gap1-GFP, was upregulated during starvation. We did not detect GFP signals for Agp1, Agp2, Yct1, Bap3, Mup3 or Mmp1 in our rich and starvation media. The signal for Sam3-GFP was detected but mislocalized to the ER.

Perhaps it should not come as a surprise that we do not detect all AATs under rich growth conditions. This is exemplified by Gap1 which is only expressed during starvation, or by Put4, which is repressed by ammonium as nitrogen source (Jauniaux, et al.,1987, Eur. J. Biochem.). Earlier studies addressed systematically the localization of N- and C-terminally GFP-tagged proteins expressed from their native promoters to generate the localization and quantitation atlas of the yeast proteome (in the Loqate database) (Breker et al., 2013, J. Cell Biol.; Breker et al., 2013, NAR). Even these studies could not report the localization of all putative AATs at the PM. Agp1, Agp2, Agp3, Alp1, Bap3, Mmp1, Put4, Sam3, Mup3, Ydt1, Vba5 (i.e. 11 AATs out of 21) were either not detected or were localized to punctate structures or the nuclear ER.

To the best of our knowledge N- or C-terminally tagged versions of Vba5 were over-expressed to detect PM localization (Shimazu et al., 2012, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.). The thiamine (vitamin B1) transporters Thi7, Nrt1 (Thi71) and Thi72 have been proposed to be Art2-dependent cargoes during substrate excess (Savocco et al., 2019). In this publication, Nrt1 and Thi72 were only detected at the PM when they were expressed under the THI7 promoter, and remained functional for thiamine transport upon N- or C-terminal tagging.

Therefore, we tested the role of Art2 in Thi7-eGFP, Nrt1-eGFP and Thi72-eGFP endocytosis during starvation. In agreement with our initial screen, Thi7-eGFP was not detected at the PM in the majority of cells, presumably because its expression is repressed by thiamine included in our growth medium (Hohmann and Meacock, 1998, BBA).

Nrt1-eGFP and Thi72-eGFP (both expressed from the THI7 promoter) localized to the plasma membrane (and vacuole) in growing cells. Both proteins underwent efficient, Art2-dependent starvation-induced endocytosis, suggesting that the extent of Art2-dependent membrane protein turnover during starvation may also vary with the growth conditions. Yet, since these proteins were not expressed from their native promoters, we prefer not to include these data into the paper and only present them here for the reviewers’ convenience (Author response image 3).

Author response image 3

Download asset Open asset

3) Subsection “A genome-wide screen identifies regulators of starvation-induced endocytosis of AATs”, first paragraph: please change FACS to Flow Cytometry there and all places thereafter including Figure 2.

Done – thank you.

4) Subsection “A genome-wide screen identifies regulators of starvation-induced endocytosis of AATs”, second paragraph: typo.

Unfortunately, we could not spot a typo in the subsection “A genome-wide screen identifies regulators of starvation-induced endocytosis of AATs”. In general, we have tried our best to avoid and correct typos.

5) Discussion, second paragraph: define UPS upon first use.

Done – thank you.

6) Figure 1A typo – should be methionine.

Done – thank you.

7) Figure 1B – "Ammonium Transporter" should be in color.

We now colored it purple.

8) Figure 4B – what is n>x means – please write how many times exactly was it repeated.

Thank you for pointing this out. In Figure 4B we have now indicated the exact numbers of repetitions.

9) Figure 6E has a very important piece of information, in that the authors show that the C-terminal segment of Mup1 can be transplanted to Hxt3. Please add the response of the un-modified Hxt3 in the same panel (and not in as Figure 6—figure supplement 2A) to have the direct comparison.

Thank you for this suggestion. We have modified Figure 6 accordingly for direct comparison.

10) The FACS-based screen of Mup1 traffic presented here is really quite nice, and provides a lot of information on proteins that regulate its endocytosis and vacuolar delivery. However, the finding that Art2 regulates stress-dependent endocytosis of a variety of transporters at the PM is neither surprising nor novel: Nikko and Pelham, 2009, published a key paper that positioned Art2 as a regulator of stress-dependent internalization of a wide variety of cargos. The stressor in was cycloheximide rather than starvation, suggesting a more general regulation of substrate-independent endocytosis. The Nikko and Pelham paper needs to be cited more prominently through this study. Its findings may not have the level of mechanistic detail presented here, but they do strongly parallel a number of key points.

Thank you, for finding the results of our screen interesting. We hope that it will represent a new and valuable resource to study how cells changes during nutrient limitation.

We also agree that the Nikko and Pelham, 2009 paper, was important and we are now citing the paper prominently on six different occasions throughout the paper. Yet, we are equally convinced that our findings on the non-redundant role and the regulation of Art2 for starvation-induced endocytosis of Mup1, Can1, Lyp1 and Tat2 could not have been predicted based on the Nikko and Pelham paper. This is based on the following arguments:

1) It is difficult (if not impossible) to compare on a mechanistic and physiological level cellular stress that is induced by cycloheximide (CHX) treatment to amino acid starvation. CHX is a translation inhibitor and therefore indirectly boosts the levels of intracellular amino acids (Beugnet, A., Biochem. J. 2003, Urban J., Mol. Cell 2007). This results in TORC1 hyperactivation (Binda M., et al. Mol. Cell 2009) and in acute growth arrest. In contrast amino acid starvation results in a depletion of free intracellular amino acid pools and in TORC1 inactivation. However, cells starving for amino acid still complete their cell cycle and slowly and ‘orderly’ enter in a G1/G0 cell cycle arrest to survive for several weeks.

2) In the Nikko paper Art2 typically has a redundant function with other α-arrestins. Expression of Art1, Art2, Art8 and Bsd2 in the 9-arrestin deletion strain partially restored CHX-induced endocytosis of the uracil transporter Fur4 (Figure 4B; Nikko and Pelham, 2009). Expression of Art2, Art8 and Bsd2 partially restored CHX-induced endocytosis of Tat2 in the 9-arrestin deletion strain (Figure 6C Nikko and Pelham, 2009).

3) The Nikko paper did not address the role of Art2 for Mup1, Lyp1 and Can1 endocytosis, which is the main focus of our work. In our hands, endocytosis of these AATs in response to CHX treatment was not (Mup1, Can1) or only partially (Lyp1) dependent on Art2. Endocytosis of Mup1 in response to CHX was limited (after 6 h + CHX, a large pool of Mup1-GFP still localized to the PM with a fraction detected inside the vacuole) and this was dependent on the presence of Art1 (see Author response image 4). Based on these results, it seems that Art2 has a minor (and potentially redundant) role for the CHX-induced endocytosis of Mup1, Can1 and Lyp1. This is in stark contrast to our results which show a rather stringent Art1 / Art2 – switch for AAT endocytosis in response to amino acid excess (Art1) or amino acid starvation (Art2).

We prefer not to include these results using CHX as a stressor, since they do not add significant new information on the regulation of nutrient transporter endocytosis in response to nutrient availability.

Author response image 4

Download asset Open asset

11) The authors state that "low levels of methionine in the growth medium did not efficiently trigger its endocytosis." Supplementary Figure 1B complicates this interpretation, as there is clearly less Mup1 overall in 0.02 ug/ml Met compared to the no Met control. This decrease suggests that the protein indeed is being internalized, albeit at a slower rate. Flux from PM to vacuole could be slow enough that GFP fluorescence does not accumulate in the vacuole. Such a phenomenon was observed for Ptr2-GFP in Apel et al. (Mol Biol Cell 28: 2434-48). Please discuss this further in the manuscript.

Thank you for pointing this out. In our original microscopy picture the overall Mup1-GFP fluorescence appeared rather low, with the Mup1-GFP signal mainly detected at the PM. This may have caused the impression that Mup1-GFP may be slowly turned over.

Therefore, we have carefully re-analyzed the data and performed new experiments. We found that in medium containing 0.02 µg/ml methionine Mup1 endocytosis was not yet triggered, at least on a detectable level. The protein levels of Mup1-GFP were analyzed by Western blot analysis from cells grown in medium without methionine or with different methionine concentrations. Without methionine or with low levels of methionine (0.02 µg/ml) the protein levels of full length Mup1-GFP were similar (new Figure 1—figure supplement 2B), whereas only clipped GFP was detected in response 2 µg/ml methionine or starvation (new Figure 1—figure supplement 2B). Our original microscopy picture did not very well represent the data. The overall Mup1-GFP appeared to be low, but localized almost exclusively to the PM. Hence it is likely that its fluorescence intensity of was not well adjusted. We apologize for the mistake and we have exchanged the image in Supplementary Figure 1B (now called Figure 1—figure supplement 2A) for a representative image that also reflects the results of the new western-blot analysis (new Figure 1—figure supplement 2B).

12) Subsection “A genome-wide screen identifies regulators of starvation-induced endocytosis of AATs”, second paragraph: identify pep4∆ as the sole "class 4" mutant, where Mup1-pHluorin accumulates in the vacuole, but remains fluorescent. This is unexpected, since Prosser et al., 2010, showed that Ste3-pHluorin is efficiently transported to the vacuole in pep4∆ prb1∆ prc1∆ cells, where fluorescence is still fully quenched. How might this discrepancy be explained?

The fluorescence of Mup1-pHlorin is partially quenched inside the vacuoles of pep4∆ single or pep4∆ prb1∆ prc1∆ triple mutants in response to starvation (see Author response image 5, this is not a major focus of our work).

One simple explanation for the difference of Mup1 to Ste3 might be the difference in their abundance. Mup1 is among the most highly expressed PM proteins in medium lacking methionine (Busto et al., 2018, PNAS, Figure 1), and it is probably vastly more abundant compared to Ste3. Hence, ‘unquenched’ Mup1-pHluorin fluorescence could be easily detected. Moreover, during starvation vacuolar enzymes are additionally engaged in the degradation of autophagic cargoes. Therefore, the breakdown of intraluminal vesicles that are delivered via the MVB pathway may become more challenging in pep4∆ mutants during starvation. Similarly, we also observed earlier that the autophagy protein pHluorin-Atg8 was not efficiently quenched inside the vacuole in the majority of pep4∆ prb1∆ prc1∆ cells during nitrogen starvation (Müller et al., 2015, Figure 3E, F).

Author response image 5

Download asset Open asset

13) The first paragraph of the subsection “Up-regulation of Art2 by the GAAC pathway drives starvation-induced endocytosis of Mup1” suggests that the observed bandshift is due to Npr1-dependent phosphorylation. This is an over-interpretation, since no direct evidence of Npr1 involvement is shown. Moreover, since Art1 is both phosphorylated and ubiquitinated, the band shift may not be due to phosphorylation at all. This should be more carefully interpreted, or more thoroughly investigated.

We thank the reviewers for pointing this out. This comment actually prevented us from making a mistake. For quantification we have now repeated this experiment three times. When repeating the experiment, we could no longer detect the band-shifts for Art1 and therefore we have replaced Figure 4A with the new experiments including quantification in Figure 4—figure supplement 1B. We now rephrased this section, as recommended, and omitted all statements regarding band-shift of Art1 from the Results section.

‘WB analysis of total cell lysates indicated that 6xHis-TEV-3xFlag-tagged Art1 protein levels were unchanged in response to starvation (Figure 4A, lanes 2,3), whereas the protein levels of the functional 170kD protein Art2-HTF (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A) were up-regulated in response to starvation (Figure 4A, lanes 5,6; Figure 4—figure supplement 1B).’

14) The first paragraph of the subsection “Up-regulation of Art2 by the GAAC pathway drives starvation-induced endocytosis of Mup1” states that levels of Art2-HTF were "comparably" low under rich conditions. What is this compared to? The blot in Figure 4A shows an increase in Art2 levels upon starvation, but levels of Art1 appear to decrease. Please clarify.

We have re-phrased the corresponding sentence as follows:

‘WB analysis of total cell lysates indicated that 6xHis-TEV-3xFlag-tagged Art1 protein levels were unchanged in response to starvation (Figure 4A, lanes 2,3), whereas the protein levels of the functional 170kD protein Art2-HTF (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A) were up-regulated in response to starvation (Figure 4A, lanes 5,6; Figure 4—figure supplement 1B).’

15) Subsection “Art2 directs Rsp5-dependent ubiquitination of C-terminal lysine residues in Mup1”, second paragraph: regarding the arrestin fold-localized PY motif, the authors state that it is required for starvation-induced endocytosis. This is an overstatement, since Figure 5E clearly shows Mup1 internalization when this PY motif is mutated, even though the amount of protein internalized is reduced. Please rephrase.

We have rephrased this section as follows:

‘Art2 has four putative PY motifs (Figure 5C). Mutations in the PY motif that resides within the predicted arrestin fold of Art2 (P748,P749,Y750) reduced starvation induced endocytosis of Mup1-GFP (Figure 5E). The Art2^{P748A,P749A,Y750A} mutant was expressed at similar levels than the WT protein (Figure 5—figure supplement 1B). We suggest that interaction between WW3 in Rsp5 and the PY motif (748-750) of Art2 was required for the efficient starvation-induced endocytosis' of Mup1.’

16) The first paragraph of the subsection “Up-regulation of Art2 by the GAAC pathway drives starvation-induced endocytosis of Mup1” states that Art1/2 regulate AAT endocytosis in a mutually exclusive manner, but this is not true for Tat2 based on Nikko and Pelham, 2008, where either is sufficient for Trp-induced internalization. Please discuss this.

We mention this in the text:

‘Substrate-induced endocytosis of Mup1, Can1 and Lyp1 required Art1, whereas in case of Tat2 substrate-induced endocytosis was less stringent and could be mediated either by Art1 or Art2 (Nikko and Pelham, 2009).’

We additionally specify:

‘Our experiments so far demonstrated that Art1 and Art2 mediate the endocytic down-regulation of Mup1, Can1 and Lyp1 in response to changes in amino acid availability in a mutually exclusive manner.’

In addition, we indicate that Tat2 differs from Mup1, Can1 and Lyp1:

‘In addition, the Art2 basic patch mutant also impaired, at least partially, starvation-induced endocytosis of Can1, Lyp1 and Ina1, while the endocytosis of Tat2 was independent of the basic patch (Figure 7B, Figure 7—figure supplement 1B, C).

Overall, it seemed that Art2 employed a positively charged region in its arrestin fold to recognize C-terminal acidic patches in at least three different AATs (Mup1, Can1, Lyp1) and thus mediate their endocytosis in starvation conditions.’

17) Subsection “The C-terminal acidic sorting signal of Mup1 is sufficient for Art2-dependent starvation-induced endocytosis”, end of first paragraph: the callout for Supplementary Figure 6B should be for Figure 6—Figure supplement 2D .

Thank you. We have corrected this mistake.

Additional note: We would like to point the reviewers’ attention to the fact that we have replaced two images of exponentially growing cells expressing Mup1-GFP (Figure 4E, left panel; Figure 1—figure supplement 2A, left panel). We noted that we had mixed them up accidentally with similar images during the figure composition. Both panels were now exchanged for the correct pictures that correspond to these experiments. Of course, these changes do not affect any of our conclusions. We apologize for this mistake.

Author details

1. Vasyl Ivashov

   Institute for Cell Biology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

   Contribution

   Resources, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft

   Contributed equally with

   Johannes Zimmer

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

2. Johannes Zimmer

   Institute for Cell Biology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

   Contribution

   Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft

   Contributed equally with

   Vasyl Ivashov

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Sinead Schwabl

   Institute for Cell Biology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

   Contribution

   Resources, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Jennifer Kahlhofer

   Institute for Cell Biology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

   Contribution

   Resources, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Sabine Weys

   Institute for Cell Biology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

   Contribution

   Resources, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

6. Ronald Gstir

   ADSI – Austrian Drug Screening Institute GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria

   Contribution

   Investigation, Methodology, Writing - review and editing, establishing and maintenance of the flow cytomerty screening platform

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

7. Thomas Jakschitz

   ADSI – Austrian Drug Screening Institute GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria

   Contribution

   Investigation, Methodology, establishing and maintenance of the flow cytomerty screening platform

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

8. Leopold Kremser

   Division of Clinical Biochemistry, ProteinMicroAnalysis Facility, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

9. Günther K Bonn

   ADSI – Austrian Drug Screening Institute GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria

   Contribution

   Investigation, Methodology, establishing and maintenance of the flow cytomerty screening platform

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

10. Herbert Lindner

    Division of Clinical Biochemistry, ProteinMicroAnalysis Facility, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

    Contribution

    Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared

11. Lukas A Huber

    1. Institute for Cell Biology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    2. ADSI – Austrian Drug Screening Institute GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria

    Contribution

    Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft, establishing and maintenance of the flow cytomerty screening platform

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared

12. Sebastien Leon

    Université de Paris, CNRS, Institut Jacques Monod, Paris, France

    Contribution

    Resources, Formal analysis, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared

    "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2536-8595

13. Oliver Schmidt

    Institute for Cell Biology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

    Contribution

    Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing

    For correspondence

    oliver.schmidt@i-med.ac.at

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared

    "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7921-4663

14. David Teis

    Institute for Cell Biology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

    Contribution

    Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared

    "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8181-0253

• 2,122

  Page views

• 340

  Downloads

• 17

  Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.